DOCSLIB.ORG

PART ONE Empire and Overshoot 11 PART TWO Global Problems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PART ONE Empire and Overshoot 11 PART TWO Global Problems CONTENTS The Mad Farmer, Flying the Flag of Rough Branch, Secedes from the Union Wendell Berry iii Introduction Ron Miller 1 PART ONE Empire and Overshoot 11 Voices for Independence Ian Baldwin 13 The Collapse of the American Empire Kirkpatrick Sale 16 Liberals and Conservatives: Relics of the Past Thomas Naylor 20 Our Land, Our Destiny: Vermont Independence Convention Keynote Address James Howard Kunstler 22 PART TWO Global Problems, Local Solutions 27 ECONOMICS 29 The Real Economy Robert Costanza 31 Economics of Scale vs. the Scale of Economics: The New Movement for Responsible Living Kirkpatrick Sale 42 Local Living Economies: Toward Basic Principles of a Bioregional Economy Judy Wicks 47 MONEY 00 Money and Liberty Adrian Kuzminski 49 Sovereignty and the Money Problem: A New Beginning Charles Eisenstein 54 Local Currency: A Revolution That Sounds Like a WhisperAmy Kirschner 59 The Buck Slows Here: Slow Me the Money, Vermont Woody Tasch 63 ENERGY 67 Powering Vermont’s Future by Embracing the Peak-Oil ChallengeCarl Etnier and Annie Dunn Watson 69 The Way of All Empires: The United States on the Eve of Peak OilIan Baldwin 74 The Great Hydropower Heist: How Corporations Colonized Our Watershed Commons Dr. Richard Foley and Hervey Scudder 80 Energy Crisis, Energy Opportunities Gaelan Brown 88 FOOD 95 What Will You Eat if Vermont Secedes? Amy Shollenberger 97 The Food Less Traveled Enid Wonnacott 102 Putting the CSA Model to the Test Robin McDermott 107 The Case for Local Wheat and Bread in Vermont Erik Andrus 110 A Portrait of Food Sovereignty Ron Miller 115 INFORMATION 119 (Un)Covering the Empire Rob Williams 121 Project Censored: News Media Checking in at the ICU Taylor Silvestri 123 Beyond Facebook: Building an Electronic Front Porch (An Interview with Michael Wood-Lewis) Rob Williams 128 Decentralizing Educational Authority Ron Miller 132 COMMUNITY 139 The National Healthcare “Debate”: Greed, a Fear of Death, and a Vermont Alternative? Thomas Naylor 141 From Common Wealth to Common Property Peter Barnes 146 Vermont’s Common Assets: From Banana Republic to Sovereign Commonwealth Gary Flomenhoft 149 RESILIENCE 153 The Great Re-Skilling: Inventing a Twenty-First-Century Vermont Rob Williams 155 Designing Our Future in a Changing World (An Interview with Ben Falk) Rob Williams 157 When the Ecofads Fade, Ditch the Carbon-Footprint Calculator and Pick up a Shovel Ben Falk 164 Be Here Now, and in a Thousand Years: Toward a Tree-Crop Culture Ben Falk 167 PART THREE Decentralism and the Vermont Tradition 175 Left and Right: An Introduction to DecentralismJohn McClaughry 177 The Decentralist Movement: A Third Way Kirkpatrick Sale 184 Distributism: Beyond Capitalism and Socialism Kirkpatrick Sale 188 The First Populist Republic Adrian Kuzminski 191 The First Vermont “Republic”: What’s in a Name? James Hogue 197 Vermont’s Genetic Code: Toward a Decentralist Manifesto Frank Bryan 200 The Cultivation of Our Own Tradition Rowan Jacobsen 203 PART FOUR Sovereignty and Secession 207 The Violence of the Centralized State Donald W. Livingston 210 War and the Second Vermont Republic Ben Scotch 216 Origins of the New England Secession Tradition Donald W. Livingston 219 Beyond Our Independence Daze: Secession, Common Sense, and the “Spirit of 1777” Rob Williams 223 The Second Vermont Republic: Frequently Asked Questions Thomas Naylor 227 The Fall of Empire: A Time for Renewal Ben Hewitt 231 Afterword Ron Miller 233 Postscript: V for Vermont: A Concluding Call to Action Juliet Buck and Rob Williams 239 Appendix: The Middlebury Declaration 241 Contributor Biographies 245 Resources for Further Reading 252 Index 256 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interview with Kirkpatrick Sale Arthur Versluis
    Interview with Kirkpatrick Sale Arthur Versluis Journal for the Study of Radicalism, Volume 2, Number 2, 2009, pp. 133-145 (Article) Published by Michigan State University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jsr.0.0001 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/254912 [ This content has been declared free to read by the pubisher during the COVID-19 pandemic. ] Interview with Kirkpatrick Sale ■ Arthur Versluis, Michigan State University irkpatrick Sale’s writing career began in the early 1970s, his first major book being SDS, the first extensive history of that seminal Kpolitical movement. Over the ensuing decades, he has continued to publish influential books, especially on bioregionalism and ecological issues, but early in the twenty-first century, he became active in the North American secessionist movement. He founded the Middlebury Institute, devoted to the ethos of decentralization, and organized secessionist conferences that brought together all the major and disparate secessionist groups in the United States, perhaps the most vigorous of which is the movement for the Second Vermont Republic. Over the course of the interview, we discussed the range of Sale’s many books, and how his more abstract points in them about bioregionalism and ecological issues become practically expressed by way of the secessionist movement that he now champions. We sat together in his booklined study, behind us dense woods visible through the window, and began by reflecting on the New Left in relation to his more recent and more radical work. AV: I’m sitting in the study with Kirkpatrick Sale. I wanted to start by just asking you about SDS [Students for a Democratic Society] and your 1973 book SDS.
    [Show full text]
  • How Safe Is Our Food?
    VOLUME TWELVE NUMBER 2 Lobbying Reform — Keeping it Legal by Cheryl Baisden When you want something really special for your birthday, it may take more than just a simple request to convince your parents to buy it. You probably start out dropping hints about how great it is, and then casually mention how your friends have it, and how good you’ll be if you get it. If that doesn’t work, maybe you become a little more helpful around the house, or try winning your mom over by complimenting her new haircut. You probably never realized it, but there’s a word for all of the effort you’re putting in — it’s called lobbying. And while you may be lobbying to get that special gift, the practice is most often used in government as a way to influence lawmakers. WINTER2008 “In government, a lobbyist is someone who tries to influence the decisions of elected officials,” explained Todd Sidor, an attorney From ‘Farm to Fork’: and lobbyist for the New Jersey State Bar Association. “Usually they are experts in certain fields, or former government officials with connections HowHow SafeSafe isis OurOur Food?Food? in certain fields, and their job is to by Barbara Sheenhan account for about 20 percent of our (CSREES); and the Department of educate legislators about why a food supply. Health and Human Services (DHHS), certain piece of legislation should or Except for the occasional recall, The remaining 80 percent of which encompasses the Centers for should not be passed. In a way, they Americans basically operate on the our food supply is regulated by Disease Control and Prevention are kind of like salesmen because assumption that our food supply is the Food and Drug Administration (CDC) and the National Institute of their job is to try to sell a certain idea safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Meeting
    VermontNumber 21 |Winter 2008 CommonsVisit us online at www.vtcommons.org VOICES OF INDEPENDENCE Reviving Town Meeting “A Gem — literate, thought- Town Meeting: A Space Vermont’s Energy Future: provoking, radical.” for Communal Liberty 10 Reasons for Hope Orion magazine By Frank Bryan By Greg Strong Vermont Commons is a print and online forum for am unsure of the exact date but the fall of 1957 ith all of the hoopla swirling around the exploring the idea of Vermont independence—politi- Iwill do. Forces in Montpelier were (and had Wtopic of the state’s energy affairs (can you cal, economic, social, and spiritual. We are unaffili- been for some time) making war on the small say: “$100 dollars per barrel,” “expiring power ated with any other organization or media, and inter- schools of Vermont. I was a sophomore at New- contracts,” “commercial wind energy,” “energy ested in all points of view. We welcome your letters, bury High School which, on a good year, gradu- efficiency funding,” “nuclear energy safety,” “food thoughts, and participation. ated about a dozen students. I was to graduate in versus biofuels,” and “carbon footprint”?), we 1959, a very good year indeed. My class had seven thought we’d jump into 2008 by focusing on IN THIS ISSUE students. what’s going right on the Vermont energy front. I was 15 in the fall of ‘57 and, like most of the Our rationale? Just maybe, a focus on the posi- 1 Town Meeting: A Space for Communal students, was opposed to the “consolidation” of tive will inform our next steps toward a more Liberty, by Frank Bryan Newbury High with schools from another town.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twenty-First Century Rediscovery of Nullification and Secession in American Political Rhetoric: Frivolousness Incarnate Or Serious Arguments to Be Wrestled With?
    The Twenty-First Century Rediscovery of Nullification and Secession in American Political Rhetoric: Frivolousness Incarnate or Serious Arguments to Be Wrestled With? Sanford Levinson* I. ZOMBIE (OR DINOSAUR) CONSTITUTIONALISM? THE REVIVAL OF NULLIFICATION AND SECESSION I begin with some news regarding contemporary American politics. On July 5, 2013, Governor Jay Nixon of Missouri vetoed a bill1 widely described as an attempt to “nullify” federal gun-control laws.2 According to one reporter: The Missouri legislation called for misdemeanor charges punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine against federal agents. It would have applied broadly to any attempt to enforce federal gun laws and regulations—past, present, or future—that “infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms.”3 A Republican legislator from a St. Louis suburb aptly described the legislation as “probably the most far-reaching attempt by a state to protect a citizen’s Second Amendment * Initially prepared for delivery as the Wylie H. Davis Distinguished Lecture, University of Arkansas School of Law, Friday, September 27, 2013. I am extremely grateful to Professor Mark Killenbeck for inviting me to deliver this lecture and for organizing the stimulating Symposium for which it serves as a “keynote.” The participation of the distinguished scholarly quartet of Mark Brandon, Jack Rakove, James Read, and Christopher Wellman was wonderfully complemented by the insights of long-time observers and participants in Arkansas politics—Bob Ballinger, Max Brantley, and Morril Harriman. As always, I am grateful to my friends Jack Balkin and Mark Graber for their close readings and many suggestions, as is true of my now sadly former U.T.
    [Show full text]
  • In Service to the Deities
    Government Be Gone! A Review of No More Mushrooms: Thoughts about Life without Government by Chellis Glendinning No More Mushrooms: Thoughts about Life without Government Kirkpatrick Sale Automedia, 99p., April 2021 You have tried legitimate royalty, manufactured royalty, parliamentary royalty, republics unitary and centralized, and the only thing from which you suffer, the despotism, the dictature of the State, you have scrupulously respected and carefully preserved. --Arthur Arnould, The Rebel, 1896 Upon entering a shop filled with household goods, I was greeted by the elderly proprietor. She took one look at me, and without any visual evidence to guide her thinking regarding my political persuasions, she launched into a lengthy and well- informed rant about how the bygone fourteen-year administration had failed the citizenry of Bolivia and how the current government of the same party was nothing more than a mirror of its predecessor. As she raged on, I felt echoes of my own loss of trust in Lyndon Johnson´s government when, in 1967, nightstick-wielding policemen turned viciously violent at L.A.´s Century Plaza march against the Vietnam War. These days I have noticed a similar cynicism about government festering in every country of the world; no matter what political party or ideology, it seems to be as 1 rampant as the Covid-19 virus. But it also remains pre-political. In other words, naysayers usually attach the problem to a particular administration or leader, a stance that gives them the idea that resolution is merely to elect a different collection of officials. Now into this snowballing of suspicion and scorn enters… Kirkpatrick Sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Engagement and Peace Corps Recruitment Efforts in the State of Vermont Kelly Dolan University of Vermont
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2016 Civic Engagement and Peace Corps Recruitment Efforts in the State of Vermont Kelly Dolan University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Dolan, Kelly, "Civic Engagement and Peace Corps Recruitment Efforts in the State of Vermont" (2016). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 658. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/658 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND PEACE CORPS RECRUITMENT EFFORTS IN THE STATE OF VERMONT A Thesis Presented By Kelly Dolan to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Specializing in Community Development and Applied Economics October, 2016 Defense Date: August 23, 2016 Thesis Examination Committee: Richard Watts, Ph.D., Advisor David Conner, Ph.D. Edward McMahon, Ph.D. Barri Tinkler, Ph. D., Chairperson Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT The United States Peace Corps’ recruitment offices actively seek a qualified volunteer base from its applicant pool for positions in over 60 countries. The state of Vermont, and colleges and universities within the state, have provided the agency with an unprecedented number of volunteers accounting for their consistently high ranking for the number of volunteers currently serving overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourteenth Amendment and the Unconstitutionality of Secession
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals June 2015 The ourF teenth Amendment and the Unconstitutionality of Secession Daniel A. Farber Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Fourteenth Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Farber, Daniel A. (2012) "The ourF teenth Amendment and the Unconstitutionality of Secession," Akron Law Review: Vol. 45 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol45/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Farber: The Fourteenth Amendment 12- FARBER_MACRO.DOCM 6/13/2012 3:42 PM THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECESSION Daniel A. Farber∗ I. Introduction ...................................................................... 479 II. Antebellum Conceptions of Citizenship and the Nature of the Union ...................................................................... 484 A. Secession and the Nature of the Union ...................... 485 B. Federalism
    [Show full text]
  • Naylor, Thomas. Secession: How Vermont and All the Other States Can Save Themselves from the Empire
    Theory in Action, Vol. 3, No.2, April 2010 (© 2010) DOI:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.10019 Naylor, Thomas. Secession: How Vermont and All the Other States Can Save Themselves from the Empire. Port Townsend, WA: Feral House, 2008. Pp. 114. $12.00 (paper). ISBN 978-1-932595307 Reviewer: Dianne Dentice1 [Article copies available for a fee from The Transformative Studies Insti- tute. E-mail address: [email protected] Website: http://www.transformativestudies.org ©2010 by The Transformative Stu- dies Institute. All rights reserved.] Is secession a viable political alternative for states such as Vermont, Ha- waii, and Texas? Can secession restore a balanced budget, peace, and environmental justice for states willing to reject the existing system of government? These are just a few of the questions that Thomas Naylor raises in his manifesto of support for an independent Vermont. As the war in Afghanistan rages on and mega-corporations such as Wal-Mart devastate small family-owned businesses across the nation, proponents of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness may reinvent themselves as modern day Ethan Allen(s) under the tutelage of radical intellectual ac- tivists such as Thomas Naylor and Kirkpatrick Sale.2 The first section of the book eulogizes the First Vermont Republic and introduces the reader to the idea of dissolution of the United States be- ginning with secession of the nation’s smallest state – Vermont. Naylor follows with a brief outline of the eight most compelling reasons for se- cession from the American Empire. He concludes with a call for Ver- mont to reclaim its soul as an independent republic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Direction of Ecological Insurrections: Political Ecology Comes to Daggers with Fukuoka
    The direction of ecological insurrections: political ecology comes to daggers with Fukuoka Alexander Dunlap1 University of Oslo, Norway Abstract This article proposes a political ecology of resistance. This is done by putting forward insurrectionary political ecology as a lens of research and struggle, through the confluence of the complementary "political" practice of insurrectionary anarchism and the "ecological" method of "no-till natural farming." While seemingly different, the article argues that these practices are compatible, animating a political ecology of resistance around anti- authoritarian political and ecological lifeways. This direction, or compass, of insurrectionary political ecology is discussed in relation to other autonomous tendencies, as it complements and strengthens existing critical schools of thought heavily influenced by political ecology, such as (decolonial) degrowth, environmental justice and post-development. Insurrectionary political ecology deepens connections with scholarly rebels in political and ecological struggles outside—and rejecting—the university system. The article includes discussions of research ethics, various conceptions of "activism", autonomous tendencies and existing differences between the concepts of "revolution" and "insurrection", in order to debate notions of "counter-hegemony" and "duel- power." The overall purpose here is to offer a theoretical ethos for a political ecology of resistance that invigorates political praxis to subvert the ongoing socio-ecological catastrophes. Keywords: Resistance; insurrectionary political ecology; post-development; decolonization; degrowth; insurrectionary ecology; environmental justice Résumé Cet article propose une écologie politique de la résistance. Cela se fait en proposant «l'écologie politique insurrectionnelle» comme un prisme de recherche et de lutte, à travers la confluence de la pratique politique de l'anarchisme insurrectionnel et de la méthode «écologique» de «l'agriculture naturelle sans labour».
    [Show full text]
  • From Citizens to Consumers: the Countercultural Roots of Green Consumerism
    From Citizens to Consumers: The Countercultural Roots of Green Consumerism A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Philip A. Wight August 2013 ©2013 Philip A. Wight. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled From Citizens to Consumers: The Countercultural Roots of Green Consumerism by PHILIP A. WIGHT has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Kevin Mattson Connor Study Professor of Contemporary History Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT WIGHT, PHILIP A., M.A. August 2013, History From Citizens to Consumers: The Countercultural Roots of Green Consumerism Director of thesis: Kevin Mattson When did American environmentalism shift from a focus on collective political action to an obsession with personal lifestyles? This thesis investigates three distinct bodies of environmental thought spanning the 1950s and the mid-1970s to answer this question. The three eco-political philosophies studied here are liberal, eco-socialist, and countercultural environmentalism. The heart of this thesis is the debate among key environmental thinkers—John Kenneth Galbraith, Stewart Brand, and Barry Commoner—concerning the role of individual consumers and the importance of public policy. This debate can be viewed as supply-side (producers) versus demand-side (consumers) environmentalism. This thesis argues America’s modern paradigm of libertarian, demand-side environmentalism and green consumerism stems from specific values, ideas, lifestyles, and worldviews representative of American counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s. In championing individual consumer choice, contemporary environmentalism has largely rejected liberal and eco-socialist prescriptions of collective political action and social democratic governance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Vermont Republic Thomas Naylor
    The Second Vermont Republic Frequently Asked Questions Thomas Naylor Issue no. 1 • April 2005 What is the Second Vermont Republic? The Second Vermont Republic (SVR) is a peaceful, democratic, grassroots, libertarian populist movement opposed to the tyranny of the U.S. Government, corporate America, and globalization and committed to the return of Vermont to its rightful status as an independent republic, as it was between 1777 and 1791. What is the primary objective of the movement? Independence. To extricate Vermont peacefully, legally, and democratically from the United States as soon as possible and create an independent nation-state based on the Swiss model. Does that mean secession? Yes. Why does Vermont want to secede? First, the United States suffers from imperial overstretch and has become unsustainable politically, economically, agriculturally, socially, culturally, and environmentally. Second, Vermont finds it increasingly difficult to protect itself from the debilitating effects of big business, big agriculture, big markets, and big government, who want all of us to be the same—just like they are. Third, the U.S. Government has lost its moral authority because it is owned, operated, and controlled by corporate America. Fourth, American foreign policy, which is based on the doctrine of full-spectrum dominance, is immoral, illegal, unconstitutional, and in violation of the United Nations charter. Fifth, as long as Vermont remains in the Union, its citizens face curtailed civil liberties, the risk of terrorist attack, and the risk of military conscription of its youth. But isn’t secession unconstitutional? No. “Whenever any form of government becomes destructive, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government,” said Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence.
    [Show full text]
  • SDS's Failure to Realign the Largest Political Coalition in the 20Th Century
    NEW DEAL TO NEW MAJORITY: SDS’S FAILURE TO REALIGN THE LARGEST POLITICAL COALITION IN THE 20TH CENTURY Michael T. Hale A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2015 Committee: Clayton Rosati, Advisor Francisco Cabanillas Graduate Faculty Representative Ellen Berry Oliver Boyd-Barret Bill Mullen ii ABSTRACT Clayton Rosati, Advisor Many historical accounts of the failure of the New Left and the ascendency of the New Right blame either the former’s militancy and violence for its lack of success—particularly after 1968—or the latter’s natural majority among essentially conservative American voters. Additionally, most scholarship on the 1960s fails to see the New Right as a social movement. In the struggles over how we understand the 1960s, this narrative, and the memoirs of New Leftists which continue that framework, miss a much more important intellectual and cultural legacy that helps explain the movement’s internal weakness. Rather than blame “evil militants” or a fixed conservative climate that encircled the New Left with both sanctioned and unsanctioned violence and brutality––like the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) counter intelligence program COINTELPRO that provide the conditions for a unstoppable tidal wave “with the election of Richard M. Nixon in 1968 and reached its crescendo in the Moral Majority, the New Right, the Reagan administration, and neo-conservatism” (Breines “Whose New Left” 528)––the key to this legacy and its afterlives, I will argue, is the implicit (and explicit) essentialism bound to narratives of the “unwinnability” of especially the white working class.
    [Show full text]