DOCSLIB.ORG

Recreational Fishing Plan March 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recreational Fishing Plan March 2020 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge Recreational Fishing Plan March 2020 Photo Credit: Tom Meredith Appendix A. Compatibility Determination Appendix B. Environmental Assessment Appendix C. Intra-Service Section 7 Evaluation Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge Recreational Fishing Plan March 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge PO Box 240 Errol, NH 03579 Submitted By: Project Leader ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Concurrence: Refuge Supervisor ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Approved: Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System ______________________________________________ ____________ Signature Date Umbagog NWR Recreational Fishing Plan Recreational Fishing Plan Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 II. Statement Of Objectives .......................................................................................................... 4 III. Description Of Fishing Program ........................................................................................... 5 A. Where would the use be conducted? ................................................................................... 5 B. Species to be Opened to Fishing ......................................................................................... 6 C. Consultation and Coordination with the State .................................................................... 6 D. Fishing Permit Requirements .............................................................................................. 6 E. Law Enforcement ................................................................................................................ 6 F. Funding and Staff Requirements ........................................................................................ 7 IV. Conduct Of The Fishing Program ........................................................................................ 7 A. Angler Information ............................................................................................................. 7 B. Refuge-Specific Fishing Regulations ................................................................................. 7 C. Relevant State Regulations ................................................................................................. 8 D. Other Refuge Rules and Regulations Related to Fishing.................................................... 8 V. Public Engagement ................................................................................................................... 9 A. Outreach for Announcing and Publicizing the Recreational Fishing Plan ......................... 9 B. Anticipated Public Reaction to the Recreational Fishing Plan ......................................... 10 C. How Anglers Will Be Informed of Relevant Rules and Regulations ............................... 10 VI. Compatibility Determination ............................................................................................... 10 List of Tables Table 1. Fishable Species at Umbagog NWR……….……………………………………………6 Table 2. Estimated Costs of the Fishing Program………………………………………………...7 List of Figures Figure 1. Recreational Fishing Areas (1) ………………………………………………………..11 Figure 2. Recreational Fishing Areas (2)………………………………………………………...12 Appendices Appendix A. Compatibility Determination……………………………………………………A-1 Appendix B. Environmental Assessment……………………………………………………...B-1 Appendix C. Intra-Service Section 7 Evaluation ……………………………………...………C-1 1 Umbagog NWR Recreational Fishing Plan I. Introduction National wildlife refuges are guided by the mission and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System), the purposes of an individual refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, Service) policy, and laws and international treaties. Relevant guidance includes the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (NWRSAA), as amended by the Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, the Refuge Recreation Act of 1962, and selected portions of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Fish and Wildlife Service Manual. The mission of the Refuge System, as outlined by the NWRSAA, as amended by the Refuge System Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), is to: “...administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.” The Act requires that refuges restore and maintain the integrity, diversity, and environmental health necessary to achieve this mission and the purposes established for each refuge. The NWRSAA mandates the Secretary of the Interior in administering the Refuge System to (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(4): ● Provide for the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plants, and their habitats within the Refuge System; ● Ensure that the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System are maintained for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans; ● Ensure that the mission of the Refuge System described at 16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(2) and the purposes of each refuge are carried out; ● Ensure effective coordination, interaction, and cooperation with owners of land adjoining refuges and the fish and wildlife agency of the States in which the units of the Refuge System are located; ● Assist in the maintenance of adequate water quantity and water quality to fulfill the mission of the Refuge System and the purposes of each refuge; ● Recognize compatible wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public uses of the Refuge System through which the American public can develop an appreciation for fish and wildlife; ● Ensure that opportunities are provided within the Refuge System for compatible wildlife-dependent recreational uses; and 2 Umbagog NWR Recreational Fishing Plan ● Monitor the status and trends of fish, wildlife, and plants in each refuge. Secretarial Order 3347 – “Conservation Stewardship and Outdoor Recreation,” signed March 2, 2017, and Secretarial Order 3356 – “Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories,” signed September 15, 2017, includes direction to Department of the Interior agencies to “…enhance recreational fishing, specifically regarding efforts to enhance and expand recreational fishing access.” CFR, Title 50, Subchapter C, further details additional procedures related to fishing on a national wildlife refuge. The Refuge Recreation Act requires that funds be available for the development, operation, and maintenance of fishing programs. It is anticipated that inclusion of a fishing program will have a negligible impact on refuge financial resources. Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge (NWR, refuge) was established in 1992 under the authority of the Emergency Wetlands Resources Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 3901 (b)), as part of a comprehensive cooperative protection and management effort to conserve wildlife, wildlife habitat, wetlands, and timber resources along the northern portion of the Maine-New Hampshire border. Partners in this conservation effort included the States of New Hampshire and Maine, conservation organizations, land trusts, and local landowners. The Umbagog area was listed by both the States of Maine and New Hampshire as a priority protection site under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan. This plan is designed to halt the decline of waterfowl populations, and involves Federal and State agencies working alongside waterfowl conservation groups and others to protect and restore waterfowl habitat. The Umbagog wetland complex has also been listed as a priority wetland for New England by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lands within the refuge acquisition boundary represent a patchwork mosaic of Federal, State, conservation organization, and private ownership, together with conservation easements held on privately owned lands. The objective of the refuge’s land acquisition program has been to complement the conservation efforts of these conservation partners. The Environmental Assessment (USFWS, 1991) establishing the refuge emphasized the importance of a cooperative partnership to achieve the larger goals of protecting wildlife habitat and preserving existing land uses. This included timber management and traditional public uses, such as fishing. These objectives received considerable support from State agencies, local conservation organizations, landowners, and the public during the initial planning process that established the refuge. Under the Wetlands Resources Act, the purpose of this refuge is “...the conservation of the wetlands of the Nation in order to maintain the public benefits they provide and to help fulfill international obligations contained in various migratory bird treaties and conventions...” Additional refuge lands purchased under the authority of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 715d) were acquired “for use as an inviolate sanctuary, or for any other management purpose, for migratory birds.” It has been determined that a recreational fishing program, conducted in accordance with State and refuge-specific regulations, will not interfere with the purposes for which the refuge was 3 Umbagog
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Mattamuskeet Frequently Asked Questions
    1 Lake Mattamuskeet Frequently Asked Questions Since so many of these questions refer to monitoring activities in the Lake and Pamlico Sound, you may want to reference the following pages: o Summary of Lake Monitoring activities: http://nc.water.usgs.gov/projects/mattamuskeet/ o Summary of Bell Island Pier activities: http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=f52ab347d5e84ccc921b 75c34fea42d5&extent=-77.5214,34.7208,-75.2252,36.3212 1. How deep is the lake? Lake depth varies from a few inches to five feet, with an average depth ranging from two to three feet depending on the season. Water levels are deepest in late fall, winter, early spring and during years with above average rainfall due to evaporation and precipitation. The deepest portions are located in the northwest portion of the lake. (see bathymetric map below). You can access the current water levels by visiting the USGS website (East and West) for Lake Mattamuskeet. Updated 10/12/16 2 2. Why is the lake so high/low? Lake levels fluctuate on a daily, seasonal and yearly basis. Water levels are primarily determined by climatic conditions. Generally, seasonal lake levels follow a pattern of being lower in the summer due to high evaporation rates and higher in fall, winter and spring due to lower evaporation rates and greater precipitation. Lake levels will increase by a few inches after a heavy rain. During wet years with lots of precipitation, water levels will rise; during drought years, water levels will fall. You can access current water levels by visiting the USGS website for Lake Mattamuskeet (East and West).
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Interim Summary Report Series No. 08-04: Rapid River Fishery Management
    FISHERY INTERIM SUMMARY REPORT SERIES NO. 08-04 RAPID RIVER FISHERY MANAGEMENT By David P. Boucher Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Division of Fisheries and Hatcheries Augusta, Maine December 2008 Job F-014 Interim Summary Report No. 4 (2007) Rapid River Fishery Management SUMMARY The Rapid River, located in Township C and Upton in Oxford County, has long been noted for its outstanding brook trout population. Brook trout in the Rapid River are sustained entirely by natural reproduction and support a popular, heavily utilized sport fishery of regional and statewide significance. Landlocked salmon are also present and provide an important ancillary fishery. During the 1980's, smallmouth bass were illegally introduced into Umbagog Lake, where they became well established and have since migrated to the Rapid River. A clerk creel survey was conducted in 2007 to monitor angler use, catch, and harvest subsequent to changes in fishing regulations and flow regimes, and to monitor the impacts of smallmouth bass. Creel survey data suggested that a decline in brook trout production documented earlier (from 2002 to 2004) was at least partially arrested, and that the vigorous expansion of smallmouth bass numbers slowed or declined by 2007. It's likely that increasingly restrictive fishing regulations, beginning in 2004, were partially responsible for the positive trend. Three consecutive years of unfavorable flows for bass spawning (2005- 2007), and the wet, cool conditions that prevailed during those years, were also important factors. By manipulating flows from Middle Dam, we'll maintain a high level of stress to smallmouth bass during their spawning, incubation, and early recruitment periods, and therefore maintain or improve conditions for trout survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Susquhanna River Fishing Brochure
    Fishing the Susquehanna River The Susquehanna Trophy-sized muskellunge (stocked by Pennsylvania) and hybrid tiger muskellunge The Susquehanna River flows through (stocked by New York until 2007) are Chenango, Broome, and Tioga counties for commonly caught in the river between nearly 86 miles, through both rural and urban Binghamton and Waverly. Local hot spots environments. Anglers can find a variety of fish include the Chenango River mouth, Murphy’s throughout the river. Island, Grippen Park, Hiawatha Island, the The Susquehanna River once supported large Smallmouth bass and walleye are the two Owego Creek mouth, and Baileys Eddy (near numbers of migratory fish, like the American gamefish most often pursued by anglers in Barton) shad. These stocks have been severely impacted Fishing the the Susquehanna River, but the river also Many anglers find that the most enjoyable by human activities, especially dam building. Susquehanna River supports thriving populations of northern pike, and productive way to fish the Susquehanna is The Susquehanna River Anadromous Fish Res- muskellunge, tiger muskellunge, channel catfish, by floating in a canoe or small boat. Using this rock bass, crappie, yellow perch, bullheads, and method, anglers drift cautiously towards their toration Cooperative (SRFARC) is an organiza- sunfish. preferred fishing spot, while casting ahead tion comprised of fishery agencies from three of the boat using the lures or bait mentioned basin states, the Susquehanna River Commission Tips and Hot Spots above. In many of the deep pool areas of the (SRBC), and the federal government working Susquehanna, trolling with deep running lures together to restore self-sustaining anadromous Fishing at the head or tail ends of pools is the is also effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangeley Lake Fish Management
    RANGELEY LAKE FISH MANAGEMENT Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Fisheries Research Bulletin No. 10 Rangeley Village with City Cove shown to the left. RANGELEY LAKE FISHERY MANAGEMENT By Raymond A. Dt'Sandre Regional Fishery Biologist, Region D Charles F. Ritzi Environmental Coordinator and William L. Woodward Assistant Regional Fishery Biologist, Region D Maynard F. Marsh, Commissioner 1977 Published Under Appropriation 4550 TABLE OF CONTENTS RANGELEY LAKE FISHERY MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF RANGELEY LAKE ................................................ 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SALMON POPULATION Introduction........................................................................................ 6 Growth and Longevity..................................................................... 6 Natural Reproduction....................................................................... 7 Dodge Pond Stream ................................................................ 7 Long Pond Stream (Greenvale Stream ).............................. 8 Rangeley Lake O u tle t............................................................ 11 Evaluation of Salmon Stocking ..................................................... 12 Stocking history and study methods......................................12 Representation of hatchery salmon in the lake population . 14 Stocking assessment and conclusions ................................ 14 a) Effects of
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Habitat
    Biological valuation of Atlantic salmon habitat within the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment Biological assessment of specific areas currently occupied by the species; and determination of whether critical habitat in specific areas outside the currently occupied range is deemed essential to the conservation of the species NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Regional Office 1 Blackburn Drive Gloucester, MA. 01930 2009 Foreword: Atlantic salmon life history........................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1: Methods and Procedures for Biological Valuation of Atlantic Salmon Habitat in the Gulf of Maine Distinct Population Segment (GOM DPS).......................................................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Identifying the Geographical Area Occupied by the Species and Specific Areas within the Geographical Area ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species essential to the conservation of the species .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Identify those “Physical
    [Show full text]
  • Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge
    Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region August 2008 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN MERRITT ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Brevard and Volusia Counties, Florida U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 3 U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 4 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 4 Legal Policy Context ..................................................................................................................... 5 National Conservation Plans and Initiatives .................................................................................6 Relationship to State Partners .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lohnwodhom's on July 16Th
    July2003 "Golden Oldies'n eventat Rutland lohnWodhom's on July 16th. Accordingto statistics FishingReport the averageage ofreser- few bank anglersfishing the the bankhowever- Trevor voir trout fishermanap- dam.The strongwind off Ashby caughthis PB rain- pearsto be fifty years. the wall blew away someof bow weighing 8lb 2oz from So they shouldhave a the hotter surfacewater al- the bank in Carot Creek. lowing cooleawater to very good trfir out! De- 200Jwillgo The fis[ which was in June cometo the surface.This mint condition,gave tails iom the lodgeon downin historyas I phenomenonis known as a Trevor a fight to remembet. 01780686441 I thesecond hottest i/ Junein recorded thermoclinetilt. Interestingly,it showedal- weath€rhistory. But it was This occunedin Gra{llam mostno sign ofErgasilus. quite overcastat timesand in July 1976when almost It was takenon an olive RWtr'FJuniors with Iightwinds made for the entirestock ofthe lake bu.zer fiom the steepside - excellentfishing from the includingthe coarse fish ofthe bay. Evening Thurs- appsred bank but evenbetter fiom in thebowl oflhe For rnanys\perienced an- dam glen day July 31"t the boats.It wasalso in a strongnorth- this hasbeen one their This eventhas had to be thund€ry.It hasbeen said easterlywind. bestseasons at thelake. DaveDoherty rnade good The fish havemade postponedto a datein beforebut you n'.:sl put 'better much useof this fact year. late August and the for- your rod down as soonas lbr his nov- conditionfiis ices mat modified. You will thereis any hint ofthunder. out on th€ WatorAid This was almostcertainly day with his prot6geslosing prolonged be rctified of this as Carbonrorls are ideal if dueto the fuh and gettingplenty ratherexpensive lighting of buzzerhatch.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Ice-Out Dates for 29 Lakes in New England, 1807–2008
    Historical Ice-Out Dates for 29 Lakes in New England, 1807–2008 Open-File Report 2010–1214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photograph shows ice-out on Jordan Bay, Sebago Lake, Maine, Spring 1985. Historical Ice-Out Dates for 29 Lakes in New England, 1807–2008 By Glenn A. Hodgkins Open-File Report 2010–1214 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Hodgkins, G.A., 2010, Historical ice-out dates for 29 lakes in New England, 1807–2008: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1214, 32 p., at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1214/. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cordell Bank CONDITION National Marine Sanctuary REPORT 2009
    Cordell Bank CONDITION National Marine Sanctuary REPORT 2009 June 2009 U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Jane Lubchenco, Ph.D. Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere National Ocean Service John H. Dunnigan, Assistant Administrator Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Daniel J. Basta, Director National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries SSMC4, N/ORM62 1305 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Cover credits: 301-713-3125 http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov Map: Bathymetric grids provided by: National Marine Sanctuary Program. Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary Feb. 2003. 70 meter bathymetric data. Original data sets from NOAA’s 1 Bear Valley Road Office of Coast Survey, and Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute. Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 http://www.ccma.nos.noaa.gov/products/biogeography/canms_cd/htm/data.htm 415-663-0314 http://cordellbank.noaa.gov Photos: Humpback whale tail: Jennifer Stock; Black-footed albatross: Cor- Report Preparers: nelia Oedekoven, SWFSC, NOAA; North Pacific giant octopus: Kip Evans; Krill: Benjamin Saenz; Dungeness crab: Richard Starr; rosy Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary: rockfish: Jodi Pirtle; Pacific white-sided dolphins: Holly Fearnbach, Dr. Lisa Etherington, Daniel Howard SWFSC, NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries: Suggested Citation: Kathy Broughton, Dr. Stephen R. Gittings Office of National Marine Sanctuaries 2009. Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary Condition Report 2009. U.S. Department of Com- Copy Editor: Celeste Leroux merce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Silver Spring, MD. 58 pp. Layout: Matt McIntosh Table of Contents About this Report ........................................................................................ 2 Summary and Findings ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid River Fishery Management (PDF)
    FISHERY INTERIM SUMMARY REPORT SERIES NO. 11-03 RAPID RIVER FISHERY MANAGEMENT By David P. Boucher Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Division of Fisheries and Hatcheries Augusta, Maine December 2011 Job F-014 Interim Summary Report No. 5 (2008-2010) Rapid River Fishery Management SUMMARY The Rapid River, located in Township C and Upton in Oxford County, has long been noted for its outstanding brook trout population. Brook trout in the Rapid River are sustained entirely by natural reproduction and support a popular, heavily utilized sport fishery of regional and statewide significance. Landlocked salmon are present also and they provide an important ancillary fishery. During the 1980’s, smallmouth bass were illegally introduced into Umbagog Lake, where they became well established and have since migrated to the Rapid River. Intensive creel surveys have been conducted periodically since 1994 to monitor this important fishery. The most recent creel surveys, including in 2010, were intended to monitor angler use, catch, and harvest subsequent to changes in fishing regulations and flow regimes, and to assess the impacts of smallmouth bass on the river’s brook trout and salmon fisheries. Creel survey data suggested that a decline in brook trout production documented earlier (from 2002 to 2004) was at least partially arrested, and that the vigorous expansion of smallmouth bass numbers slowed or declined. We attributed this to improved protection of brook trout provided by more restrictive fishing regulations, beginning in 2004; to wet, cool environmental conditions that prevailed during several years from 2005 to 2010; and to unfavorable river flows for bass spawning and early recruitment during the same period.
    [Show full text]
  • Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations
    Illustrations by Duane Raver/USFWS Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ke2it2to2the2nkke2it2to2the2nk TennesseeTennessee bankbank fishingfishing opportunitiesopportunities Inside this guide Go fish!.......................................................................................1 Additional fishing opportunities and information..........6 Take it to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities was Licenses and regulations........................................................1 Additional contact agencies and facilities.....................6 produced by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Tennes- Bank fishing tips........................................................................2 Water release schedules..........................................................6 see Technological University’s Center for the Management, Utilization Black bass..................................................................................2 Fishing-related Web sites.................................................... ....6 and Protection of Water Resources under project 7304. Development Sunfish (bream).........................................................................2 How to read the access tables.................................................7 of this guide was financed in part by funds from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Crappie..................................................................3 Access table key........................................................................7 (Public Law 91-503) as documented
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Dinner & Auction
    ANNUAL DINNER & AUCTION Wednesday 14th November 2018 Fishmongers’ Hall, London Bridge THE GREAT SALMON & TROUT CONSERVATION AUCTION 2018 14th November Auctioneer: Neil Freeman, Esq. www.salmon-trout.org Registered Charity No. 1123285 Charity registered in Scotland SC041584 Message from our Chairman, William Hicks Q.C. Welcome to the 2018 Salmon & Trout to provide a detailed picture of the Conservation Annual Fundraising health of rivers. This will provide both Dinner. a basis for lobbying for recognition of We work to protect and improve the the true state of these rivers and the overall environment of rivers for wild need for policy improvements; and fish, focussing particularly on water an indication of particular problems quality and quantity; and to protect and the likely causes, to provide a wild migratory fish. We have had a basis for action. The survey work has busy year. I give two examples: now been completed for 12 rivers and reports are being produced for each The Scottish Parliamentary one. The task now is to extend this Committee Inquiries into salmon survey work to more rivers using a farming, which we were instrumental mixture of professionals and trained in securing and to which we gave volunteers, and to use the results to detailed evidence, should be close support our programme of persuasion to completion by the time you read and action. this. We have already had the report of the Environment Committee We do not receive any government which was strongly critical of the funding and so the successes of way in which salmon farming is the last year, and our continuing currently operated in Scotland.
    [Show full text]