An Attractive Blue Diopside from Sissone Valley, Western Alps, Italy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Age and Origin of Silicocarbonate Pegmatites of the Adirondack Region
minerals Article Age and Origin of Silicocarbonate Pegmatites of the Adirondack Region Jeffrey Chiarenzelli 1,*, Marian Lupulescu 2, George Robinson 1, David Bailey 3 and Jared Singer 4 1 Department of Geology, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY 13617, USA 2 New York State Museum, Research and Collections, Albany, NY 12230, USA 3 Geosciences Department, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 13323, USA 4 Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Rensselaer, NY 12180, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-315-229-5202 Received: 24 July 2019; Accepted: 19 August 2019; Published: 23 August 2019 Abstract: Silicocarbonate pegmatites from the southern Grenville Province have provided exceptionally large crystal specimens for more than a century. Their mineral parageneses include euhedral calc–silicate minerals such as amphibole, clinopyroxene, and scapolite within a calcite matrix. Crystals can reach a meter or more in long dimension. Minor and locally abundant phases reflect local bedrock compositions and include albite, apatite, perthitic microcline, phlogopite, zircon, tourmaline, titanite, danburite, uraninite, sulfides, and many other minerals. Across the Adirondack Region, individual exposures are of limited aerial extent (<10,000 m2), crosscut metasedimentary rocks, especially calc–silicate gneisses and marbles, are undeformed and are spatially and temporally associated with granitic pegmatites. Zircon U–Pb results include both Shawinigan (circa 1165 Ma) and Ottawan (circa 1050 Ma) intrusion ages, separated by the Carthage-Colton shear zone. Those of Shawinigan age (Lowlands) correspond with the timing of voluminous A-type granitic magmatism, whereas Ottawan ages (Highlands) are temporally related to orogenic collapse, voluminous leucogranite and granitic pegmatite intrusion, iron and garnet ore development, and pervasive localized hydrothermal alteration. -
The Wittelsbach-Graff and Hope Diamonds: Not Cut from the Same Rough
THE WITTELSBACH-GRAFF AND HOPE DIAMONDS: NOT CUT FROM THE SAME ROUGH Eloïse Gaillou, Wuyi Wang, Jeffrey E. Post, John M. King, James E. Butler, Alan T. Collins, and Thomas M. Moses Two historic blue diamonds, the Hope and the Wittelsbach-Graff, appeared together for the first time at the Smithsonian Institution in 2010. Both diamonds were apparently purchased in India in the 17th century and later belonged to European royalty. In addition to the parallels in their histo- ries, their comparable color and bright, long-lasting orange-red phosphorescence have led to speculation that these two diamonds might have come from the same piece of rough. Although the diamonds are similar spectroscopically, their dislocation patterns observed with the DiamondView differ in scale and texture, and they do not show the same internal strain features. The results indicate that the two diamonds did not originate from the same crystal, though they likely experienced similar geologic histories. he earliest records of the famous Hope and Adornment (Toison d’Or de la Parure de Couleur) in Wittelsbach-Graff diamonds (figure 1) show 1749, but was stolen in 1792 during the French T them in the possession of prominent Revolution. Twenty years later, a 45.52 ct blue dia- European royal families in the mid-17th century. mond appeared for sale in London and eventually They were undoubtedly mined in India, the world’s became part of the collection of Henry Philip Hope. only commercial source of diamonds at that time. Recent computer modeling studies have established The original ancestor of the Hope diamond was that the Hope diamond was cut from the French an approximately 115 ct stone (the Tavernier Blue) Blue, presumably to disguise its identity after the that Jean-Baptiste Tavernier sold to Louis XIV of theft (Attaway, 2005; Farges et al., 2009; Sucher et France in 1668. -
Yellowish Green Diopside and Tremolite from Merelani, Tanzania
YELLOWISH GREEN DIOPSIDE AND TREMOLITE FROM MERELANI, TANZANIA Eric A. Fritz, Brendan M. Laurs, Robert T. Downs, and Gelu Costin tion (typical of diopside, which is a pyroxene) shown by other crystals in the parcels. Four similar-appearing yellowish green samples Mr. Ulatowski loaned one example of both types of from Block D at Merelani, Tanzania, were identified crystals to GIA for examination (figure 1), and we also as diopside and tremolite. The gems are identical in color, but their standard gemological properties are typical for calcic pyroxene and amphibole. The identification of the diopside was made with Raman Figure 1. These yellowish green crystals were recov- spectroscopy, while single-crystal X-ray diffraction ered from Block D at Merelani in the latter part of and electron-microprobe analyses were used to 2005. A blocky morphology is shown by the diopside confirm the amphibole species as tremolite. crystal (1.6 cm tall; left and bottom), whereas the Absorption spectroscopy (in the visible–mid-infrared tremolite crystal has a flattened, diamond-shaped range) revealed that the two gem materials are col- cross-section. Photos by Robert Weldon. ored by V3+, Cr3+, or both. t the 2006 Tucson gem shows, Steve Ulatowski A showed one of the authors (BML) some yellowish green crystals that he purchased as diopside while on buy- ing trips to Tanzania in August and November 2005. The material was reportedly produced during this time period from Block D at Merelani, in the same area that yielded some large tsavorite gem rough (see Laurs, 2006). Mr. Ula- towski obtained 1,200 grams of the green crystals, mostly as broken pieces ranging from 0.1 to 50 g (typically 1–5 g). -
X-Ray Structure Refinements of Tremolite at 140 and 295 K: Crystal Chemistry and Petrologic Implications
American Mineralogist, Volume 81, pages 1117-1125,1996 X-ray structure refinements of tremolite at 140 and 295 K: Crystal chemistry and petrologic implications HEXIONG YANG1.. ANDBERNARD W. EVANS2 'Department of Geological Sciences. Campus Box 250, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0250, U.S.A. 2Department of Geological Sciences, Box 351310, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1310, U.S.A. ABSTRACT A near-end-member natural tremolite, N!lo.o,Ca1.97M~.9sFeo.Q3Alo.oISis.oo022(OH)2'was studied by single-crystal X-ray diffraction at 140 and 295 K to seek a possible crystal- chemical explanation for the typically low CaI~ M ratios, relative to the ideal ratio of 2/5, observed in both natural and synthetic tremolite samples. Difference-Fourier maps re- vealed the presence of a residual electron density close to the M4 site along the diad axis toward the octahedral strip. Structure refinements indicated that the M4 and M4' sites are occupied by Ca + Na and M(Fe + Mg), respectively. In comparison with the configuration of the M2 coordination polyhedron in diopside, the degree of distortion and the volume of the M4 coordination polyhedron in tremolite are relatively large and the M4 cation is slightly underbonded. These two factors contribute to an energetic drive toward M-en- riched tremolite. The average unit-cell volume of 906.6(2) A3 determined at 295 K for nearly pure tremolite in this study suggests an end-member reference-state volume for tremolite of907 A3. This indicates that cell volumes of synthetic tremolite of 904.2(4) A3 reflect 8-10% cummingtonite solid solution, as previous authors have claimed. -
Geology and Mineral Deposits of Jumbo Basin Southeastern Alaska
Geology and Mineral Deposits of Jumbo Basin Southeastern Alaska GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 251 Geology and Mineral Deposits of Jumbo Basin Southeastern Alaska By GEORGE C. KENNEDY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 251 A discussion of the contact metamorphism, geomagnetic surveys, magnetite deposits, and iron ore reserves of part of Prince of Whales Island. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1953 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract. __________________________________________ 1 Contact metamorphism—Continued Introduction ______________________________________ 1 Metamorphism in the vicinity of the Magnetite Cliff Previous work. _ _ _______________________________ 1 bodies—Continued Present work- ________ 1 Metamorphism of the schists.________________ 20 Acknowledgments. ______________ _______________ 2 Metamorphism of the dike rocks._____________ 20 Geography__ _______________________________________ 2 Metamorphism in the vicinity of the upper magnetite Location and accessibility________________________ 2 bodies_ _______________________---_----_-_____ 21 Topography. ____________________________!______ 3 Exomorphism of the marble__________________ 21 Climate, water supply, and vegetation. ____________ 4 Endomorphism of the intrusive rocks__________ 22 History and production______________________________ 4 Metamorphism -
Winter 1998 Gems & Gemology
WINTER 1998 VOLUME 34 NO. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 243 LETTERS FEATURE ARTICLES 246 Characterizing Natural-Color Type IIb Blue Diamonds John M. King, Thomas M. Moses, James E. Shigley, Christopher M. Welbourn, Simon C. Lawson, and Martin Cooper pg. 247 270 Fingerprinting of Two Diamonds Cut from the Same Rough Ichiro Sunagawa, Toshikazu Yasuda, and Hideaki Fukushima NOTES AND NEW TECHNIQUES 281 Barite Inclusions in Fluorite John I. Koivula and Shane Elen pg. 271 REGULAR FEATURES 284 Gem Trade Lab Notes 290 Gem News 303 Book Reviews 306 Gemological Abstracts 314 1998 Index pg. 281 pg. 298 ABOUT THE COVER: Blue diamonds are among the rarest and most highly valued of gemstones. The lead article in this issue examines the history, sources, and gemological characteristics of these diamonds, as well as their distinctive color appearance. Rela- tionships between their color, clarity, and other properties were derived from hundreds of samples—including such famous blue diamonds as the Hope and the Blue Heart (or Unzue Blue)—that were studied at the GIA Gem Trade Laboratory over the past several years. The diamonds shown here range from 0.69 to 2.03 ct. Photo © Harold & Erica Van Pelt––Photographers, Los Angeles, California. Color separations for Gems & Gemology are by Pacific Color, Carlsbad, California. Printing is by Fry Communications, Inc., Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. © 1998 Gemological Institute of America All rights reserved. ISSN 0016-626X GIA “Cut” Report Flawed? The long-awaited GIA report on the ray-tracing analysis of round brilliant diamonds appeared in the Fall 1998 Gems & Gemology (“Modeling the Appearance of the Round Brilliant Cut Diamond: An Analysis of Brilliance,” by T. -
Tungsten Minerals and Deposits
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 652 4"^ TUNGSTEN MINERALS AND DEPOSITS BY FRANK L. HESS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. , 7 Inquiries concerning tungsten......................................... 7 Survey publications on tungsten........................................ 7 Scope of this report.................................................... 9 Technical terms...................................................... 9 Tungsten................................................................. H Characteristics and properties........................................... n Uses................................................................. 15 Forms in which tungsten is found...................................... 18 Tungsten minerals........................................................ 19 Chemical and physical features......................................... 19 The wolframites...................................................... 21 Composition...................................................... 21 Ferberite......................................................... 22 Physical features.............................................. 22 Minerals of similar appearance................................. -
The Effect of Grinding on Tremolite Asbestos and Anthophyllite Asbestos
minerals Article The Effect of Grinding on Tremolite Asbestos and Anthophyllite Asbestos Andrea Bloise 1,* ID , Robert Kusiorowski 2 ID and Alessandro F. Gualtieri 3 1 Department of Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Calabria, via Pietro Bucci, I-87036 Rende, CS, Italy 2 Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Refractory Materials Division in Gliwice, ul. Toszecka 99, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, I-41125 Modena, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0984-493588 Received: 4 June 2018; Accepted: 25 June 2018; Published: 28 June 2018 Abstract: The six commercial asbestos minerals (chrysotile, fibrous actinolite, crocidolite, amosite, fibrous tremolite, and fibrous anthophyllite) are classified by the IARC as carcinogenic to humans. There are currently several lines of research dealing with the inertisation of asbestos minerals among which the dry grinding process has received considerable interest. The effects of dry grinding on tremolite asbestos and anthophyllite asbestos in eccentric vibration mills have not yet been investigated. Along the research line of the mechanical treatment of asbestos, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dry grinding in eccentric vibration mills on the structure, temperature stability, and fibre dimensions of tremolite asbestos from Val d’Ala, (Italy) and UICC standard anthophyllite asbestos from Paakkila mine (Finland) by varying the grinding time (30 s, 5 min, and 10 min). After grinding for 30 s to 10 min, tremolite asbestos and anthophyllite asbestos showed a decrease in dehydroxylation and breakdown temperatures due to the increase in lattice strain and the decrease in crystallinity. -
Vermiculite Is Not Asbestos
VERMICULITE IS NOT ASBESTOS There are no real causes for concern about health risks from vermiculite: a review of the mineralogy of vermiculite and its fundamental differences to asbestos explains why. John Addison Addison-Lynch, Edingburgh February 1994 SUMMARY • Vermiculite is a sheet silicate mineral that is found as flaky crystals; it is not a fibrous mineral like asbestos. Fibres of vermiculite can be formed by breakage of the flakes or by curling of the edges of the flakes. Such mineral fibres do not constitute asbestos, and fibrous shape does not, by itself, mean that they will behave like asbestos. • Vermiculite dusts, including these fibrous fragment forms, have demonstrated very few if any health effects, other than those that could be expected from any low toxicity silicate. Unlike asbestos, vermiculite has shown very few ill-effects in experimental testing with animals. Chemical testing suggests that it may not stay long enough in the lung to do serious damage. • All vermiculite ores contain a range of other minerals that were formed along with the vermiculite in the rock. Vermiculite ores from some sources were even found to contain asbestos minerals but asbestos is not intrinsic to vermiculite and only a few ore bodies have been found to contain more than tiny trace amounts. Nevertheless serious public concern was generated because of the known occurrences of asbestos in vermiculite deposits such as those in Montana that were closed some years ago • Asbestos is the name given to a number of naturally occurring fibrous silicate minerals that have been exploited for their useful properties such as thermal insulation, chemical and thermal stability, and high tensile strength. -
The J Oumal Of
The Joumal of Gemmological Association and Gem Testing Laboratory of Great Britain 27 Greville Street, London EC1N 8TN Tel: 020 7404 3334 Fax: 020 7404 8843 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.gem-a.info President: Professor A.T. Collins Vice-Presidents: N. W. Deeks, A.E. Farn, R.A. Howie, D.G. Kent, R.K. Mitchell Honorary Fellows: Chen Zhonghui, R.A. Howie, K. Nassau Honorary Life Members: H. Bank, D.J. Callaghan, E.A. Jobbins, H. Tillander Council of Management: T.J. Davidson, R.R. Harding, I. Mercer, J. Monnickendam, M.J. O'Donoghue, E. Stern, I. Thomson, V.P. Watson Members' Council: A.J. Allnutt, S. Burgoyne, P. Dwyer-Hickey, S.A. Everitt, J. Greatwood, B. Jackson, L. Music, J.B. Nelson, P.G. Read, P.J. Wates, C.H. Winter Branch Chairmen: Midlands - G.M. Green, North West - D. M. Brady, Scottish - B. Jackson, South East - C.H. Winter, South West - R.M. Slater Examiners: A.J. Allnutt, M.Sc, Ph.D., FGA, L. Bartlett, B.Sc, M.Phil., FGA, DGA, S. Coelho, B.Sc, FGA, DGA, Prof. A.T. Collins, B.Sc, Ph.D, A.G. Good, FGA, DGA, J. Greatwood, FGA, G.M. Green, FGA, DGA, G.M. Howe, FGA, DGA, S. Hue Williams MA, FGA, DGA, B. Jackson, FGA, DGA, G.H. Jones, B.Sc, Ph.D., FGA, Li Li Ping, FGA, DGA, M.A. Medniuk, FGA, DGA, M. Newton, B.Sc, D.PWL, C.J.E. Oldershaw, B.Sc. (Hans), FGA, DGA, H.L. Plumb, B.Sc, FGA, DGA, R.D. -
Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee, -
Diopside Camgsi2o6 C 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic
Diopside CaMgSi2O6 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2=m: As prismatic crystals with nearly square cross sections, to 50 cm; granular, columnar, lamellar massive. Twinning: Simple or multiple twins on 100 or 010 , common. f g f g Physical Properties: Cleavage: Distinct on 110 , (110) (110) 87±; partings on 100 and probably 010 . Fracture: Uneven to conchofidal.g Tenaci^ty: Britt»le. Hardness = 5f.5{6.g5 D(meas.) = 3.f22{3g.38 D(calc.) = 3.278 Optical Properties: Transparent to opaque. Color: Colorless, white, yellow, pale to dark green, black; colorless in thin section. Streak: White, gray, gray-green. Luster: Vitreous or dull. Optical Class: Biaxial (+). Orientation: Y = b; Z c = 38± on (010); X a = 22±. ^ ¡ ^ ¡ Dispersion: r > v; weak to moderate. ® = 1.664 ¯ = 1.672 ° = 1.694 2V(meas.) = 59± Cell Data: Space Group: C2=c: a = 9.746 b = 8.899 c = 5.251 ¯ = 105:63± Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Schwartzenstein, Austria. (ICDD 11-654). 2.991 (100), 2.528 (40), 2.893 (30), 2.518 (30), 3.23 (25), 2.952 (25), 1.625 (25) Chemistry: (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) SiO2 54.66 54.09 FeO 0.07 1.47 K2O 0.15 + TiO2 0.28 MnO 0.02 0.09 H2O 0.22 0.22 Al2O3 0.07 1.57 MgO 18.78 16.96 H2O¡ 0.08 Fe2O3 0.68 0.74 CaO 25.85 21.10 rem: 0.49 Cr2O3 2.03 Na2O 1.37 Total 100.35 100.64 3+ (1) Juva, Finland; corresponds to Ca1:00(Mg1:01Fe0:02)§=1:03Si1:98O6: (2) Dutoitspan mine, 2+ Kimberley, Cape Province, South Africa; corresponds to (Ca0:82Na0:05Fe0:04Mg0:04K0:01)§=0:96 3+ (Mg0:88Cr0:06Al0:03Fe0:02Ti0:01)§=1:00(Si1:96Al0:04)§=2:00O6: Polymorphism & Series: Forms two series, with hedenbergite, and with johannsenite.