Office of Sponsored Programs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Office of Sponsored Programs Office of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs Policy ID: 0017 Date: 06/10/2020 Status: Approved Procedure Type: Public Issuing Office: Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) Responsible Executive: Provost Purpose: The following guideline outlines the allowable costs for grants, industry sponsored agreements, and subawards at Liberty University. The guideline assures compliance with The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance): 2 CFR Part 200. Guideline Statement: Regardless of funding agency, Liberty University determines cost allowability for sponsored programs based on the following questions: • Are costs allocable, allowable, consistent, and reasonable in like circumstances? • Allowed by the OMB Uniform Guidance? • It serves the grant purpose (instruction, research, public service/outreach)? • Allowed by the University’s policy? Key Cost Principals for Federal Awards: Adherence to these principals is necessary for all federal awards. This guidance is based on the interpretation of federal regulations. For any costs charged directly to a federal (or federal flow- through) award the expense must be: • Allowable under both the provisions of federal guidance and the terms of a specific award. Costs must conform to any limitations or exclusions stated in the sponsored agreement. • Allocable such that the expense can be associated to an award with a high degree of accuracy. The cost is incurred for the benefit of only one project, or the item can be easily assigned to multiple benefiting projects. A specific project may only be charged that portion of the cost that represents the direct benefit to that project. 1 • Reasonable so the cost reflects what a “prudent person” would pay in a similar circumstance and is generally recognized as necessary for the performance of the project. • Consistently so similar costs are treated as direct or Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs when incurred in like circumstances. Costs generally direct charged to a sponsored project should not be included as F&A costs on other projects when incurred for the same purposes. • Facilities & Administrative Costs (F&A): Costs that are incurred for common or joint objectives and, therefore, cannot be identified readily and specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional activity, or any other institutional activity. F&A costs are synonymous with the term “indirect costs.” An expense is a “direct cost” if that expense can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project or other activity with a high degree of accuracy. Indirect costs are costs that benefit many activities (e.g., building operations and maintenance, information technology (IT) expenses, security or administrative personnel such as grant managers, etc.). F&A costs are recovered through the federally negotiated rate. Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct expenses or as an F&A cost. Identification with the sponsored work, (i.e., the scope of work) rather than the nature of the goods and services involved, is the determining factor in distinguishing direct from F&A costs of sponsored agreements. Key Cost Principals for Non-Federal Awards: Proper stewardship of non-federal awards, including those from non-US governmental sponsors, requires adherence to these key principles: • Allowable under Liberty University policies and procedures, and complies with the terms and conditions of the award. • Directly benefits the purpose of the award such that the expense can be associated with, and is in support of, the project or program. • Reasonable so the expense reflects what a “prudent person” would pay in a similar circumstance Expenses on non-federal awards require the careful review of terms and conditions and any other supporting documentation (e.g., approved budget, sponsor guidance) in order to determine appropriateness of charges. Any questionable expenses, if not specifically captured in the approved budget, should be reviewed 2 by the OSP prior to expending funds. Specific sponsor approval may also be required—and should be documented. Procedures and Guidelines for Monitoring Sponsored Awards: Regular monitoring by OSP and Finance of sponsored awards helps to: • Confirm the availability of funds to complete the project; • Ensure costs are consistent with the project schedule; • Discover any errors in the budget, encumbrances or actual expenditures that need to be corrected; • Avoid over-spending; and • Verify cost transfers/labor redistributions have been completed in a timely manner To minimize risk of non-compliance, principal investigators are encouraged to review their budgets on a monthly basis. Unallowable Costs: Typically unallowable costs on federal awards include: • Advertising for general promotion of the University, including printed materials, promotional items, memorabilia, gifts, and souvenirs • Advertising for recruitment purposes that includes color or is excessive in size • Alcoholic beverages • Alumni or fund-raising activities • Antiques • Bad debt write-offs • Donations or Contributions • Commencement expenses • Cost Overruns • Costs on Industry, Foreign Government, or Other Non- Government Grants/Contracts • Decorative objects for private offices • Entertainment • Fine/original art • Fines and penalties • First-class/business-class air travel differentials • Flowers • Gifts, prizes, and awards • Goods or services for personal use • Lobbying • Memberships in airline travel clubs 3 • Memberships in civic, social, community organizations, or country clubs • Faculty and exempt staff salary in excess of base rates paid by the institution (as defined by the OSP IBS policy) • Selling or marketing products or services of the University • Social events Allowable Costs: A cost is allowable when allowed by OMB Uniform Guidance, it serves the sponsored program purpose (instruction, research, service) federal regulations, and is allowed by Liberty University. Such costs are: • Salaries and fringe benefits of faculty, technicians, research assistants, and other personnel directly engaged in performing sponsored program’s scope of work • Supplies and materials necessary for performing sponsored program’s scope of work • Other costs such as travel, subcontracts, specialty equipment repairs and maintenance, and other directly related costs necessary for performing sponsored program’s specific scope of work • Capital equipment that is approved by the sponsor • Service/maintenance agreements on capital equipment approved by the sponsor Review Cycle: Every two years or as needed. The Provost will approve all OSP policies. 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Wilmerhale's Matthew Martens on Religious Liberty, More Hours and 'Drowning in Email' During COVID-19
    APRIL 23, 2020 WilmerHale’s Matthew Martens on Religious Liberty, More Hours and 'Drowning in Email' During COVID-19 The former SEC litigator discusses Judge Justin Walker’s ruling for a Kentucky church’s Easter services and what happens when your dog interrupts your Zoom client call. BY JACQUELINE THOMSEN Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and The WilmerHale team also Dorr partner Matthew Martens is no helped file acomplaint against stranger to quick turnarounds for Greenville, Mississippi, Mayor Err- religious liberty cases: He once got ick Simmons over an apparent ban a call at 9 p.m. asking for his help on drive-in services there. First Lib- filing a brief by 10 a.m. the next day erty Institute later said in a state- on behalf of a Jewish Chabad orga- ment that officials clarified those nization ahead of Yom Kippur and services are allowed. managed to meet the deadline. Martens spoke from his home in That experience in religious lib- Vienna, Virginia, where he’s stay- erty litigation came to Marten’s ing with his family, about his expe- advantage in recent weeks as he, rience. This has been edited for joined by WilmerHale senior asso- length and clarity. ciate Kevin Gallager and associates Q: You’ve now worked on a cou- Hyun-Soo Lim and Andrew Miller, ple of cases with the First Liberty worked with the First Liberty Insti- Institute, challenging local restric- Matthew Martens of WilmerHale. tute and others to challenge restric- tions on religious services. How did tions to church services during the you get involved in these cases and I’ve worked with First Liberty COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Media Corporation Owns Interests in a Broad Range of Media, Communications and Entertainment Businesses
    2021 PROXY STATEMENT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT YEARS OF LIBERTY 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS STOCK PERFORMANCE INVESTMENT SUMMARY PROXY STATEMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION CORPORATE DATA ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this Annual Report constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding business, product and marketing plans, strategies and initiatives; future financial performance; demand for live events; new service offerings; renewal of licenses and authorizations; revenue growth and subscriber trends at Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (Sirius XM Holdings); our ownership interest in Sirius XM Holdings; the recoverability of goodwill and other long- lived assets; the performance of our equity affiliates; projected sources and uses of cash; the payment of dividends by Sirius XM Holdings; the impacts of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); the anticipated non-material impact of certain contingent liabilities related to legal and tax proceedings; and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In particular, statements in our “Letter to Shareholders” and under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contain forward looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Security and Liberty in Germany
    Balancing Security and Liberty in Germany Russell A. Miller* INTRODUCTION Scholarly discourse over America’s national security policy frequently invites comparison with Germany’s policy.1 Interest in Germany’s national security jurisprudence arises because, like the United States, Germany is a constitutional democracy. Yet, in contrast to the United States, modern Germany’s historical encounters with violent authoritarian, anti-democratic, and terrorist movements have endowed it with a wealth of constitutional experience in balancing security and liberty. The first of these historical encounters – with National Socialism – provided the legacy against which Germany’s post-World War II constitutional order is fundamentally defined.2 The second encounter – with leftist domestic radicalism in the 1970s and 1980s – required the maturing German democracy to react to domestic terrorism.3 The third encounter – the security threat posed in the * Associate Professor of Law, Washington & Lee University School of Law ([email protected]); co-Editor-in-Chief, German Law Journal (http://www.germanlaw journal.com). This essay draws on material prepared for a forthcoming publication. See DONALD P. KOMMERS & RUSSELL A. MILLER, THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (3rd ed., forthcoming 2011). It also draws on a previously published piece. See Russell A. Miller, Comparative Law and Germany’s Militant Democracy, in US NATIONAL SECURITY, INTELLIGENCE AND DEMOCRACY 229 (Russell A. Miller ed., 2008). The essay was written during my term as a Senior Fulbright Scholar at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law in Heidelberg, Germany. 1. See, e.g., Jacqueline E. Ross, The Place of Covert Surveillance in Democratic Societies: A Comparative Study of the United States and Germany, 55 AM.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Redevelopment Area Plans
    February 2015 Community Redevelopment Area Plans Northbank Downtown CRA & Southside CRA Downtown Jacksonville Community Redevelopment Plan July 30, 2014 Acknowledgements This Community Redevelopment Plan has been prepared under the direction of the City of Jacksonville Downtown Investment Authority serving in their capacity as the Community Redevelopment Agency established by City of Jacksonville Ordinance 2012-364-E. The planning effort was accomplished through considerable assistance and cooperation of the Authority’s Chief Executive Officer, the Governing Board of the Downtown Investment Authority and its Redevelopment Plan Committee, along with Downtown Vision, Inc. the City’s Office of Economic Development and the Planning and Development Department. The Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes. In addition to those listed below, we are grateful to the hundreds of citizens who contributed their time, energy, and passion toward this update of Downtown Jacksonville’s community redevelopment plans. Mayor of Jacksonville Jacksonville City Council Alvin Brown Clay Yarborough, President Gregory Anderson, Vice-President Downtown Investment Authority William Bishop, AIA, District 2 Oliver Barakat, Chair Richard Clark, District 3 Jack Meeks, Vice-Chair Donald Redman, District 4 Craig Gibbs, Secretary Lori Boyer, District 5 Antonio Allegretti Matthew Schellenberg, District 6 Jim Bailey, Jr. Dr. Johnny Gaffney, District 7 Melody Bishop, AIA Denise Lee, District
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Human Consciousness
    Running head: AI IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS 1 Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Human Consciousness Hannah DeFries A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2019 AI IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Kyung K. Bae, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Jung-Uk Lim, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Mark Harris, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ James H. Nutter, D.A. Honors Director ______________________________ Date AI IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS 3 Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) can be defined as the ability of a machine to learn and make decisions based on acquired information. AI’s development has incited rampant public speculation regarding the singularity theory: a futuristic phase in which intelligent machines are capable of creating increasingly intelligent systems. Its implications, combined with the close relationship between humanity and their machines, make achieving understanding both natural and artificial intelligence imperative. Researchers are continuing to discover natural processes responsible for essential human skills like decision-making, understanding language, and performing multiple processes simultaneously. Artificial intelligence
    [Show full text]
  • Fringe Season 1 Transcripts
    PROLOGUE Flight 627 - A Contagious Event (Glatterflug Airlines Flight 627 is enroute from Hamburg, Germany to Boston, Massachusetts) ANNOUNCEMENT: ... ist eingeschaltet. Befestigen sie bitte ihre Sicherheitsgürtel. ANNOUNCEMENT: The Captain has turned on the fasten seat-belts sign. Please make sure your seatbelts are securely fastened. GERMAN WOMAN: Ich möchte sehen wie der Film weitergeht. (I would like to see the film continue) MAN FROM DENVER: I don't speak German. I'm from Denver. GERMAN WOMAN: Dies ist mein erster Flug. (this is my first flight) MAN FROM DENVER: I'm from Denver. ANNOUNCEMENT: Wir durchfliegen jetzt starke Turbulenzen. Nehmen sie bitte ihre Plätze ein. (we are flying through strong turbulence. please return to your seats) INDIAN MAN: Hey, friend. It's just an electrical storm. MORGAN STEIG: I understand. INDIAN MAN: Here. Gum? MORGAN STEIG: No, thank you. FLIGHT ATTENDANT: Mein Herr, sie müssen sich hinsetzen! (sir, you must sit down) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Beruhigen sie sich! (calm down!) Entschuldigen sie bitte! Gehen sie zu ihrem Sitz zurück! [please, go back to your seat!] FLIGHT ATTENDANT: (on phone) Kapitän! Wir haben eine Notsituation! (Captain, we have a difficult situation!) PILOT: ... gibt eine Not-... (... if necessary...) Sprechen sie mit mir! (talk to me) Was zum Teufel passiert! (what the hell is going on?) Beruhigen ... (...calm down...) Warum antworten sie mir nicht! (why don't you answer me?) Reden sie mit mir! (talk to me) ACT I Turnpike Motel - A Romantic Interlude OLIVIA: Oh my god! JOHN: What? OLIVIA: This bed is loud. JOHN: You think? OLIVIA: We can't keep doing this.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberty Champion, Volume 21, Issue 5)
    Scholars Crossing 2003 -- 2004 Liberty University School Newspaper Fall 10-21-2003 10-21-03 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 21, Issue 5) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_03_04 Recommended Citation "10-21-03 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 21, Issue 5)" (2003). 2003 -- 2004. 5. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_03_04/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School Newspaper at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 -- 2004 by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bandaging Best Baptist paper Searching for America's in the land Starlight Liberty Champion wins "Best Overall" Soldiers at student journalism conference . Student's play premieres SEE PAGE 10 SEE PAGE 5 SEE PAGE 4 The Liberty SERVING LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOR TWENTY YEARS VOL. 21, NO. 5 ion LU graduate to speak OCTOBER 21, 2003 at 1MB fall conference I Have a Dream tour comes to LU By Ricky Haitiison NEWS REPORTER In a time when ministry in the Middle East seems about as dry as that region's climate, one missionary from the area reports that God is bringing about amazing victories in this Mus­ lim-saturated land. LU graduate Tommy Weir will be sharing some of these optimistic testimonies in next Monday's convocation, Oct. 27, as a part of this year's fall missions conference. "I will be speaking about...the need for aggressive evangelism if we are to have a har­ vest. It is an exciting time to serve in this part of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema and the Unconscious: Filmic Representations of Dreams
    Cinema and the Unconscious: Filmic Representations of Dreams Branson Stowell Films Studies Departmental Honors Thesis University of Colorado at Boulder April 7th, 2015 Thesis Advisor Melinda Barlow | Film Studies Committee Members Melinda Barlow | Film Studies Giulia Bernardini | Humanities Jennifer Peterson | Film Studies Page !1 of !54 Table of Contents I. Abstract 3 II. Introduction 5 III. Mulholland Dr 13 IV. Inception 26 V. Conclusion 43 VI. Bibliography 53 Page !2 of !54 I. Abstract “Dreams are the touchstones of our characters.” - Henry David Thoreau, A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers The ubiquitous nature of dreams works to connect all humankind through its powerful presence in both our waking and sleeping life. I became curious about the unconscious after I recorded a series of dreams that I experienced last summer. After looking at this phenomena from the outside, I became invested in the narrative aspect of dreams and the personal nature the dreamer has with each dream. It then occurred to me how significant dreams are in our daily life. We experience thousands of dreams throughout our lifetime - varying constructions of our unconscious reassembled night after night. One of the remarkable things about dreams is that only the individual gets to experience them directly. There have been many cultural attempts to capture the dream experience. From the paintings of Salvador Dali to the poetry of Edgar Allan Poe, dreams have been a popular catalyst for artistic creation. When film came into existence, it too tried to capture that special, esoteric quality which was seemingly exclusive to the world of the dream.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberty Champion, Volume 5, Issue 21)
    Scholars Crossing 1987 -- 1988 Liberty University School Newspaper 3-30-1988 03-30-1988 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 5, Issue 21) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_87_88 Recommended Citation "03-30-1988 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 5, Issue 21)" (1988). 1987 -- 1988. 23. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_87_88/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School Newspaper at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1987 -- 1988 by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TheLibertyChampion Vol.5 No.21 Liberty University, Lynchburg, Va. Wednesday, March 30, 1988 INDEX Page 2 Newsbriefs Pro/Con Page 3 Newsbriefs Man on the Street Contras Page 4-5 Regis fashion Page 6 CBA trip Page 7 Not Really Relevant Page 8-9 SGA Special Page 11 Warren Stewart Page 12 LU Soldiers Activities Page 13 Single Purpose Circle K Page 14 Baseball report Page 15 Lacrosse Lady Flames Track Ivan's column Page 16 Sid Bream Annetta Paraham Gerald Swann JAMES DEAN? Professor Del Rey Loven, otherwise known as Delvis, performed for Search '88 Saturday night in the Multi-Purpose Center. Photo by Don Hayden. Pag* 2 March 30,1988 Liberty Champion Political Issues News Contras: should the U.S. send aid? Briefs: From UPI Newswire cently said the people there are plead­ A: "Our organization will not take a By Steve Sitzai Pro- ing for our help to free them from position on possibilities for potential It took some tense moments Sandinista communism.
    [Show full text]
  • Statue of Liberty National Monument and Ellis Island New Jersey and New York July 2018 Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Statue of Liberty National Monument and Ellis Island New Jersey and New York July 2018 Foundation Document NEW JERSEY HUDSON JERSEY CITY RIVER NEW YORK Ferry tickets MANHATTAN N Railroad Terminal ew J e r Liberty State Park s e Ferry tickets y Battery f Castle Clinton e Park Ellis r National r Island y Monument Statue of Liberty National y EAST RIVER rr Monument e f rk o Y ew Governors Island Liberty N National Monument Island North 0 0.5 Kilometer BROOKLYN 0 0.5 Mile ELLIS ISLAND IMMIGRATION MUSEUM Interior shown at right Ferry Building American Immigrant Museum Wall of Honor Entrance Ellis Island Fort Gibson 0 75 meters 0 250 feet Buildings shown in gray are closed to the public. Statue of Liberty National Monument and Ellis Island Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Statue of Liberty National Monument 3 Ellis Island 5 Park Purpose 6 Park Significance 7 Fundamental Resources and Values 8 Other Important Resources and Values 10 Interpretive Themes 10 Part 2: Dynamic Components 11 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 11 Special Mandates 11 Administrative Commitments 11 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 12 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 13 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values 28 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs 31 Planning and Data Needs 31 Part 3: Contributors 33 Statue of Liberty National Monument and
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Five Primary Negative Thoughts: a Twenty-One Day Plan for Men
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OVERCOMING THE FIVE PRIMARY NEGATIVE THOUGHTS: A TWENTY- ONE DAY MIND RENEWAL PLAN FOR MEN A Thesis Project Submitted to Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF MINISTRY By Paul R. Chipman Lynchburg, Virginia December 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Paul R. Chipman All Rights Reserved LIBERTY UNIVERSITY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY THESIS PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET ______________________________ GRADE _____________________________ Dr. Charles N. Davidson Director, Doctor of Ministry Program Associate Professor of Chaplaincy ____________________________ Dr. David W. Hirschman Acting Dean Assistant Professor of Religion ABSTRACT OVERCOMING THE FIVE PRIMARY NEGATIVE THOUGHTS: A TWENTY-ONE DAY PLAN FOR MEN Paul R. Chipman Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 2014 Mentor: Dr. Charles N. Davidson The Bible commands Christians to be transformed by renewing their minds with the Word of God. This project proposes a biblical mind transformation plan targeting men specifically, as well as the broader body of Christ. The plan equips Christians with the skills to learn how to identify, control, and eliminate the five primary negative thoughts. Once identified, these unhealthy thoughts will be replaced with a plethora of healthy self empowering thoughts resulting in a renewed Christ centered mindset. The research for this plan will be based on the Holy Scriptures, neuroscience (brain research), and cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Pre and post-assessment surveys will be given to all participants to measure the effectiveness of this project in changing their thought lives. Men who wish to be delivered and set free mentally from harassing thoughts such as, regrets of the past, fear of the future, unhealthy comparisons, self- condemning thoughts, and temptations of lustful thoughts of all kinds, this research project is their deliverance.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Graduate Writing (Full Text).Pdf
    Introduction to Graduate Writing Liberty University Graduate Writing Center Dr. Emily Heady, Director Copyright © 2007 Liberty University Graduate Writing Center All rights reserved. Acknowledgements This workbook is a collaborative effort, and gratitude is due to all LU faculty, Graduate Writing Center employees, and students who contributed to this effort. Specifically, Dr. John Thomas, Dr. Steve Deckard, and Dr. Fred Smith offered insights and concrete advice on graduate-level writing. In addition, Diana Haddad and Allison Scoles contributed their technical and artistic expertise throughout the writing process. Thanks are due as well to Dr. Fred Milacci, Dr. Barbara Boothe, Dr. Patti Hinkley, Dr. Boyd Rist, and all members of Liberty’s QEP Steering Committee, who were involved in this project from its earliest stages. Table of Contents Chapter I. What is Graduate Writing? . 1 Unit I. Grammar 911. 4 Chapter II. People, Places, Things, and Words that Go with Them . 5 Chapter III. Verbs and Words that Go with Them . 21 Chapter IV. Other Little Words . 29 Chapter V. Writing Good Sentences: Grammar in Context . 31 Unit II. Punctuation 911 . 46 Chapter VI. Punctuation . 47 Unit III. Research Paper 911 . 58 Chapter VII. Thinking like a Writer . 59 Chapter VIII. Writing in Your Discipline. 77 Chapter IX. The Research Paper . 84 Chapter I. What is Graduate Writing? What Is This Book About? “Graduate-level writing” is a deceptively simple term because the demands placed on students by the various disciplines, formats, and genres in which they write differ widely. For example, a student in the Counseling Department must learn to use APA documentation, while students in English use MLA, and Seminary students use Turabian.
    [Show full text]