Scrub Oak Shrubland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scrub Oak Shrubland Classification of the Natural Communities of Massachusetts Terrestrial Communities Descriptions Scrub Oak Shrubland Community Code: CT2B1F1000 State Rank: S2 Concept: A shrubland dominated by scrub oak, with essentially no pitch pine (stems are very scattered if present), although within Pitch Pine - Scrub Oak Communities. Environmental Setting: Scrub Oak Shrublands are dense shrublands, dominated by shrub oaks forming almost impenetrable thickets ranging from 2-3 feet (about 1m) to greater than 6 feet (2m) in height. They occur on sandplains, usually in depressions where localized frosts keep out competing trees, and on ridge tops. Disturbances in both environments maintain mosaics in space and time of grassland and heathland openings, shrublands, Pitch Pine - Scrub Oak Communities, and oak/pine forest. Scrub Oak Shrublands are dry with few nutrients available, since neither sand nor shallow soils on bedrock hold water or nutrients. Besides frosts that damage competing tree species, fires that eliminate or significantly reduce trees establish and maintain Scrub Oak Shrublands. Because the component shrub species both foster and are adapted to fire, Scrub Oak Shrublands are considered to be fire-dependent communities; scrub oak and heath species resprout readily after fires. It is likely that in the past this community burned under a variety of conditions, including during droughts and possibly during the growing season as well as the dormant season, so that structural and compositional variation may have been greater than what we see today. In addition, scrub oak communities seldom occur on land that has been plowed; even a hundred years after agricultural abandonment, many vegetatively reproducing plants are missing from the vegetation on previously plowed lands. Vegetation Description: Scrub Oak Shrublands are dominated by shrub oaks, scrub oak (also called bear oak) (Quercus ilicifolia) and dwarf chinquapin oak (Quercus prinoides), that together Classification of the Natural Communities of Massachusetts Terrestrial Communities Descriptions have at least 40% cover. Sparse (<10% cover) tree species may include pitch pine (Pinus rigida), red or black oak (Quercus rubra or velutina), gray birch (Betula populifolia), and quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). Other characteristic plants include black huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata), lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium), early sweet blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum), black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa), sheep laurel (Kalmia angustifolia), and sweet fern (Comptonia peregrina), along with Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), poverty grass (Danthonia spicata), cow wheat (Melampyrum lineare), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi), and areas of lichens (Cladina and Cladonia spp.). Differentiating Occurrences: Scrub Oak Shrublands occur within Pitch Pine - Scrub Oak Communities, particularly in frost bottoms and frost pockets, and on ridge tops near Ridgetop Pitch Pine - Scrub Oak Communities. May be in a matrix with Sandplain Heathlands. Scrub Oak Shrublands are dominated by dense shrub oaks and lack pitch pine, on sand and on bedrock. Pitch Pine - Scrub Oak Communities have up to about 25% cover by pitch pine trees, are on sand or gravel, tend to be large, and have most of the same species. Ridgetop Pitch Pine - Scrub Oak Communities have scattered stunted pitch pine and dense scrub oak, and usually have little bare rock. They are on bedrock ridgetops. Ridgetop Heathlands lack abundant scrub oak and pitch pine, have large areas dominated by fairly continuous cover (>50%) of low shrubs, usually lowbush blueberry, and have little exposed bedrock. Rocky summit/rock outcrop communities are dominated by bare or lichen-covered rock. Identifying community types on rock outcrops is complicated by mixing of types in mosaics and overlap of constituent species. Very small occurrences of any community types should be considered to be parts of the prevailing community. Associated Fauna: Scrub Oak Shrublands provide similar shrub habitat to the Pitch Pine - Scrub Oak Community often surrounding a shrubland. Species in Scrub Oak Shrublands include rare, as well as more common, moths and butterflies that are dependent on oaks and members of the blueberry family. Scrub Oak Shrublands in southeastern Massachusetts are being increasingly managed for New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis), which benefits other species that use the protection dense shrubs offer for nesting and resting, including Prairie Warbler (Dendroica discolor), which is declining throughout its range due to habitat loss. Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), which nest in dense tangled vegetation, are very common in some scrub oak areas. Large mammals tend to avoid the dense shrub thickets. Public Access: Middlesex Fells, Medford; Myles Standish State Forest, Plymouth; Lovell's Lane Conservation Area, Mashpee; Manuel F. Correllus State Forest, West Tisbury. Threats: Development and fragmentation of the entire systems. Management Needs: Experiments are needed to ascertain the fire dependence/sensitivity of the community and its dependent species. Classification of the Natural Communities of Massachusetts Terrestrial Communities Descriptions USNVC/NatureServe: Nature Serve Systems: CES202.600 Central Appalachian Pine-Oak Rocky Woodland and CES203.269 Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain Pitch Pine Barrens. Quercus ilicifolia Shrubland Alliance -- Quercus ilicifolia-Quercus prinoides Shrubland [CEGL006111] and Quercus ilicifolia - Prunus pumila Shrubland [CEGL006121]. .
Recommended publications
  • Oak Diversity and Ecology on the Island of Martha's Vineyard
    Oak Diversity and Ecology on the Island of Martha’s Vineyard Timothy M. Boland, Executive Director, The Polly Hill Arboretum, West Tisbury, MA 02575 USA Martha’s Vineyard is many things: a place of magical beauty, a historical landscape, an environmental habitat, a summer vacation spot, a year-round home. The island has witnessed wide-scale deforestation several times since its settlement by Europeans in 1602; yet, remarkably, existing habitats rich in biodiversity speak to the resiliency of nature. In fact, despite repeated disturbances, both anthropogenic and natural (hurricanes and fire), the island supports the rarest ecosystem (sand plain) found in Massachusetts (Barbour, H., Simmons, T, Swain, P, and Woolsey, H. 1998). In particular, the scrub oak (Quercus ilicifolia Wangenh.) dominates frost bottoms and outwash plains sustaining globally rare lepidopteron species, and formerly supported the existence of an extinct ground-dwelling bird, a lesson for future generations on the importance of habitat preservation. European Settlement and Early Land Transformation In 1602 the British merchant sailor Bartholomew Gosnold arrived in North America having made the six-week boat journey from Falmouth, England. Landing on the nearby mainland the crew found abundant codfish and Gosnold named the land Cape Cod. Further exploration of the chain of nearby islands immediately southwest of Cape Cod included a brief stopover on Cuttyhunk Island, also named by Gosnold. The principle mission was to map and explore the region and it included a dedicated effort to procure the roots of sassafras (Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Nees) which were believed at the time to be medicinally valuable (Banks, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Name Common Name NATURAL ASSOCIATIONS of TREES and SHRUBS for the PIEDMONT a List
    www.rainscapes.org NATURAL ASSOCIATIONS OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR THE PIEDMONT A list of plants which are naturally found growing with each other and which adapted to the similar growing conditions to each other Scientific Name Common Name Acer buergeranum Trident maple Acer saccarum Sugar maple Acer rubrum Red Maple Betula nigra River birch Trees Cornus florida Flowering dogwood Fagus grandifolia American beech Maple Woods Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-tree, yellow poplar Liquidamber styraciflua Sweetgum Magnolia grandiflora Southern magnolia Amelanchier arborea Juneberry, Shadbush, Servicetree Hamamelis virginiana Autumn Witchhazel Shrubs Ilex opaca American holly Ilex vomitoria*** Yaupon Holly Viburnum acerifolium Maple leaf viburnum Aesulus parvilflora Bottlebrush buckeye Aesulus pavia Red buckeye Carya ovata Shadbark hickory Cornus florida Flowering dogwood Halesia carolina Crolina silverbell Ilex cassine Cassina, Dahoon Ilex opaca American Holly Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip-tree, yellow poplar Trees Ostrya virginiana Ironwood Prunus serotina Wild black cherry Quercus alba While oak Quercus coccinea Scarlet oak Oak Woods Quercus falcata Spanish red oak Quercus palustris Pin oak Quercus rubra Red oak Quercus velutina Black oak Sassafras albidum Sassafras Azalea nudiflorum Pinxterbloom azalea Azalea canescens Piedmont azalea Ilex verticillata Winterberry Kalmia latifolia Mountain laurel Shrubs Rhododenron calendulaceum Flame azalea Rhus copallina Staghorn sumac Rhus typhina Shining sumac Vaccinium pensylvanicum Low-bush blueberry Magnolia
    [Show full text]
  • Oaks (Quercus Spp.): a Brief History
    Publication WSFNR-20-25A April 2020 Oaks (Quercus spp.): A Brief History Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care / University Hill Fellow University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources Quercus (oak) is the largest tree genus in temperate and sub-tropical areas of the Northern Hemisphere with an extensive distribution. (Denk et.al. 2010) Oaks are the most dominant trees of North America both in species number and biomass. (Hipp et.al. 2018) The three North America oak groups (white, red / black, and golden-cup) represent roughly 60% (~255) of the ~435 species within the Quercus genus worldwide. (Hipp et.al. 2018; McVay et.al. 2017a) Oak group development over time helped determine current species, and can suggest relationships which foster hybridization. The red / black and white oaks developed during a warm phase in global climate at high latitudes in what today is the boreal forest zone. From this northern location, both oak groups spread together southward across the continent splitting into a large eastern United States pathway, and much smaller western and far western paths. Both species groups spread into the eastern United States, then southward, and continued into Mexico and Central America as far as Columbia. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Today, Mexico is considered the world center of oak diversity. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Figure 1 shows genus, sub-genus and sections of Quercus (oak). History of Oak Species Groups Oaks developed under much different climates and environments than today. By examining how oaks developed and diversified into small, closely related groups, the native set of Georgia oak species can be better appreciated and understood in how they are related, share gene sets, or hybridize.
    [Show full text]
  • Explain Kotar Classification
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Implementation of a Long-term Vegetation Monitoring Program at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GLKN/NRTR—2010/405 ON THE COVER Clockwise from top left: recording the groundlayer in 1m2 quadrat; measuring tree DBH; beech bark disease. Photographs by: GLKN vegetation monitoring field crew Implementation of a Long-term Vegetation Monitoring Program at Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GLKN/NRTR—2010/405 Suzanne Sanders and Jessica Grochowski National Park Service Great Lakes Inventory & Monitoring Network 2800 Lake Shore Dr. East Ashland, WI 54806 FortNovember Collins, 2010 Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE ERICACEAE (Heath Family) A family of about 107 genera and 3400 species, primarily shrubs, small trees, and subshrubs, nearly cosmopolitan. The Ericaceae is very important in our area, with a great diversity of genera and species, many of them rather narrowly endemic. Our area is one of the north temperate centers of diversity for the Ericaceae. Along with Quercus and Pinus, various members of this family are dominant in much of our landscape. References: Kron et al. (2002); Wood (1961); Judd & Kron (1993); Kron & Chase (1993); Luteyn et al. (1996)=L; Dorr & Barrie (1993); Cullings & Hileman (1997). Main Key, for use with flowering or fruiting material 1 Plant an herb, subshrub, or sprawling shrub, not clonal by underground rhizomes (except Gaultheria procumbens and Epigaea repens), rarely more than 3 dm tall; plants mycotrophic or hemi-mycotrophic (except Epigaea, Gaultheria, and Arctostaphylos). 2 Plants without chlorophyll (fully mycotrophic); stems fleshy; leaves represented by bract-like scales, white or variously colored, but not green; pollen grains single; [subfamily Monotropoideae; section Monotropeae]. 3 Petals united; fruit nodding, a berry; flower and fruit several per stem . Monotropsis 3 Petals separate; fruit erect, a capsule; flower and fruit 1-several per stem. 4 Flowers few to many, racemose; stem pubescent, at least in the inflorescence; plant yellow, orange, or red when fresh, aging or drying dark brown ...............................................Hypopitys 4 Flower solitary; stem glabrous; plant white (rarely pink) when fresh, aging or drying black . Monotropa 2 Plants with chlorophyll (hemi-mycotrophic or autotrophic); stems woody; leaves present and well-developed, green; pollen grains in tetrads (single in Orthilia).
    [Show full text]
  • Gaylussacia Vaccinium
    Contents Table des matières The Canadian Botanical The first Recipient of the 2005 Undergraduate Botanical Association Bulletin Presentation Regional Award / Première remise d’un prix régional pour la meilleure communication étudiante de premier cycle page 13 Bulletin de l’Association Editor’s Message / Message du rédacteur page 14 botanique du Canada May/ Mai 200 5 • Volume 38 No. / No 2 The first Recipient of the 2005 Undergraduate Botanical PhD Opportunities page 14 Presentation Regional Award Jessie Carviel, student at McMaster University, received this CBA award for the best student paper presented at the 2005 Biology Day in Sudbury, ON, Canada. Paper / Article Miss Carviel is representing the Ontario Region for this contest. The Undergraduate Botanical Presentation Award was created in 2003 by the CBA to encourage undergraduate students to pursue graduate research in botany and to enhance the visibility of the Association. The program offers annually one award of $200.00 for one of the undergraduate conferences/meetings in Biology for each of the five (5) regions of Canada: Atlantic region, Qué bec, Ontario, Prairies and Territories, and British Columbia. Première remise d’un prix ré gional pour la meilleure Poorly Known Economic communicationé tudiante de premier cycle Plants of Canada - 45. Eastern huckleberries Jessie Carviel, étudiante à l’université McMaster, a reçu ce prix de l’ABC pour (Gaylussacia spp.) une présentation faite lors de la Journée de biologie 2005 qui s’est déroulée à and western huckleberries Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. (Vaccinium spp.). E. Small and P.M. Catling Le prix de la meilleure communication étudiante de premier cycle a été créé en pages 15-23 2003 par l’ABC pour inciter les étudiant(e)s à poursuivre leurs études en botanique et pour améliorer la visibilité de l'Association.
    [Show full text]
  • THAISZIA the Role of Biodiversity Conservation in Education At
    Thaiszia - J. Bot., Košice, 25, Suppl. 1: 35-44, 2015 http://www.bz.upjs.sk/thaiszia THAISZIAT H A I S Z I A JOURNAL OF BOTANY The role of biodiversity conservation in education at Warsaw University Botanic Garden 1 1 IZABELLA KIRPLUK & WOJCIECH PODSTOLSKI 1Botanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland, +48 22 5530515 [email protected], [email protected] Kirpluk I. & Podstolski W. (2015): The role of biodiversity conservation in education at Warsaw University Botanic Garden. – Thaiszia – J. Bot. 25 (Suppl. 1): 35-44. – ISSN 1210-0420. Abstract: The Botanic Garden of Warsaw University, established in 1818, is one of the oldest botanic gardens in Poland. It is located in the centre of Warsaw within its historic district. Initially it covered an area of 22 ha, but in 1834 the garden area was reduced by 2/3, and has remained unchanged since then. Today, the cultivated area covers 5.16 ha. The plant collection of 5000 taxa forms the foundation for a diverse range of educational activities. The collection of threatened and protected Polish plant species plays an especially important role. The Botanic Garden is a scientific and didactic unit. Its educational activities are aimed not only at university students, biology teachers, and school and preschool children, but also at a very wide public. Within the garden there are designed and well marked educational paths dedicated to various topics. Clear descriptions of the paths can be found in the garden guide, both in Polish and English. Specially designed educational games for children, Green Peter and Green Domino, serve a supplementary role.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Gene Flow in the Genus Quercus L
    Review article Reproduction and gene flow in the genus Quercus L A Ducousso H Michaud R Lumaret 1 INRA, BP 45, 33611 Gazinet-Cestas; 2 CEFE/CNRS, BP 5051, 34033 Montpellier Cedex, France Summary &mdash; In this paper we review the characteristics of the floral biology, life cycle and breeding system in the genus Quercus. The species of this genus are self-incompatible and have very long life spans. The focus of our review is on the effects of gene flow on the structuration of genetic varia- tion in these species. We have examined the influence of gene flow in 2 ways: 1) by measuring the physical dispersal of pollen, seed and vegetative organs; and 2) by using nuclear and cytoplasmic markers to estimate genetic parameters (Fis, Nm). These approaches have shown that nuclear (iso- zyme markers) as well as cytoplasmic (chloroplastic DNA) gene flow is usually high, so that very low interspecific differentiation occurs. However, intraspecific differentiation is higher for the cytoplasmic DNA than for the nuclear isozyme markers. floral biology / life cycle / breeding system / gene flow / oak Résumé &mdash; Système de reproduction et flux de gènes chez les espèces du genre Quercus. Les caractéristiques de la biologie florale, du cycle de vie et du système de reproduction ont été analysées pour les espèces du genre Quercus. Ces espèces sont auto-incompatibles et à très lon- gue durée de vie. Les effets des flux de gènes sur la structuration de la variabilité génétique ont aussi été étudiés de 2 manières. D’une part, grâce aux mesures de la dispersion du pollen, des graines et des organes végétatifs, et, d’autre part, en utilisant des paramètres génétiques (Fis, Nm) obtenus à partir des marqueurs nucléaires et cytoplasmiques.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Fire Frequency on the Reproductive Success of Buzz-Pollinated Blueberry (Vaccinium Pallidum) and Huckleberry (Gaylussacia Baccata) Kaitlyn E
    The effects of fire frequency on the reproductive success of buzz-pollinated blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum) and huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata) Kaitlyn E. Irwin (University of Scranton, Scranton PA 18510), Claire O’Kane (Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14850), Timothy Green (Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton NY 11973), and Nicole Miller-Struttmann (Webster University, St. Louis, MO 63119) Abstract Fire suppression has dramatically modified wildlands in the United States. Following forest fires, the release of nutrients triggers flowering, seed germination, and the creation of bee nesting habitats. Since fire suppression prevents this regeneration from occurring, pollination services may be diminished as well. The focus of our project is to determine the effects of fire on the reproductive success of two buzz- pollinated plant species, blueberry (Vaccinium pallidum) and huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata). Our prediction is that fire will increase the reproductive success of these plant species through enhanced bee abundance and diversity. To test this, we quantified flower production bee activity along a fire gradient at Brookhaven National Lab. We examined pollination success (the number and diversity of pollen grains on stigmas) and fruiting success. Our results indicate that flower production, bee activity, and plant reproductive success were influenced by fire frequency. However, our results did not support our hypothesis, and instead showed that fire has a significantly negative effect on huckleberry and blueberry reproductive success. Introduction Results • Fire suppression turns pine habitats into • Bee density was directly correlated with flower abundance (F1,1 = 161.28, P = 0.050; Fig. 2A) and indirectly closed-canopy forests dominated by oaks and correlated with fire frequency (F1,1 = 18.59, P = 0.15; Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Ozone Sensitive Plant Species on NPS and U.S. FWS Lands
    Ozone Sensitive Plant Species on National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands: Results of a June 24-25, 2003 Workshop Baltimore, Maryland National Park Service Air Resources Division U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Air Quality Branch November 2003 Ozone Sensitive Plant Species on National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands: Results of a June 24-25, 2003 Workshop Baltimore, Maryland Prepared by: Ellen Porter, Air Resources Division, National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Air Resources Division, Denver, Colorado U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Air Quality Branch, Denver, Colorado November 2003 NPS D1522 Natural Resource Report NPS/NRARD/NRR-2003/01 Acknowledgements: Drs. Art Chappelka, Howie Neufeld, Donald Davis, Robert Kohut and Pat Temple provided scientific expertise at the Baltimore Workshop. Dr. Gretchen Smith, Jim Renfro, Dr. David Peterson, Ed Jepsen, Dr. John Skelly, and Dr. William Manning provided additional scientific expertise and peer review. The author wishes to thank Tonnie Maniero, Tamara Blett, and Kristi Morris for helpful editing comments. This report is available at: www2.nature.nps.gov/ard/pubs/index.htm Cover photos by Dr. Donald Davis Contents Summary..................................................................................................1 Background ..............................................................................................1 Workshop Goals and Results .....................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant List Trees.XLS
    Lower Makefield Township Native Plant List* TREES LIGHT MOISTURE TYPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STREET SUN PART SHADE DRY MOIST WET TREE SHADE EVERGREEN Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic White Cedar x x x x IIex opaca American Holly x x x x Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar x x x Picea glauca White Spruce x x x Picea pungens Blue Spruce x x x Pinus echinata Shortleaf Pine x x x Pinus resinosa Red Pine x x x Pinus rigida Pitch Pine x x Pinus strobus White Pine x x x Pinus virginiana Virginia Pine x x x Thuja occidentalis Eastern Arborvitae x x x x Tsuga canadensis Eastern Hemlock xx x DECIDUOUS Acer rubrum Red Maple x x x x x x Acer saccharinum Silver Maple x x x x Acer saccharum Sugar Maple x x x x Asimina triloba Paw-Paw x x Betula lenta Sweet Birch x x x x Betula nigra River Birch x x x x Betula populifolia Gray Birch x x x x x Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam x x x (C. tomentosa) Carya alba Mockernut Hickory x x x x Carya cordiformis Bitternut Hickory x x x Carya glabra Pignut Hickory x x x x x Carya ovata Shagbark Hickory x x Castanea pumila Allegheny Chinkapin xx x Celtis occidentalis Hackberry x x x x x x Crataegus crus-galli Cockspur Hawthorn x x x x Crataegus viridis Green Hawthorn x x x x Diospyros virginiana Common Persimmon x x x x Fagus grandifolia American Beech x x x x PAGE 1 Exhibit 1 TREES (cont'd) LIGHT MOISTURE TYPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STREET SUN PART SHADE DRY MOIST WET TREE SHADE DECIDUOUS (cont'd) Fraxinus americana White Ash x x x x Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash x x x x x Gleditsia triacanthos v.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit L1 – List of Native Overstory Trees in Frederick County *Aste
    List of Native Overstory Trees In Middletown, MD Source: Exhibit L1 – List of Native Overstory Trees in Frederick County *Asterisks indicate additions to List made because of naturalization or other reasons, assessed by Frederick County Planning Department Conifers - Scientific Name Common Name(s) (and Broad-leafed Evergreens) Juniperus virginiana (Eastern) Red Cedar Pinus echinata Shortleaf Pine Pinus punguns Table Mountain Pine Pinus rigida Pitch Pine Pinus strobus White Pine Pinus virginiana Virginia Pine *Taxodium distichum *Bald Cypress Tsuga canadensis Eastern Hemlock Hardwoods – Scientific Name Common Name(s) Acer negundo Box-Elder Acer nigrum Black Maple Acer rubrum Red Maple Acer saccharinum Silver Maple (Invasive Native – not recommended) Acer saccharum Sugar Maple Alnus rugosa, (serrulata) Smooth Alder (Hazel Alder) Betula lenta Black Birch (Sweet Birch) Betula nigra River Birch (Black Birch) Carpinus caroliniana Blue Beech (American Hornbeam, Musclewood, Ironwood) Carya cordiformis Bitternut Hickory Carya glabra Pignut Hickory Carya ovata Shagbark Hickory Carya pallida Sand Hickory Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory Castanea dentata (American) Chestnut Castanea pumila Eastern or Allegheny Chinkapin Celtis occidentalis Hackberry Fagus grandifolia (American) Beech Fraxinus species–There is a temporary, albeit indefinite ban on Ash trees in Frederick County. Juglans cinerea Butternut Juglans nigra Black Walnut *Liquidambar styraciflua *Sweet Gum Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree (Tulip Poplar) Magnolia acuminata Cucumber Tree
    [Show full text]