Southeastern Theological Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SOUTHEASTERN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW VOL. 8, NO. 1, SPRING 2017 Introduction The Curse of Cain Reconsidered: Benjamin L. Merkle 1 A Study of the Translation of min ha’adamah in Genesis 4:11a “Out of Egypt I Called My Son”: Todd Borger 41 Intertextuality and Metalepsis in Matthew 2:15 Rescuing Adam: Three Approaches Charles L. Quarles 3 to Affi rming a Historical Adam Kenneth D. Keathley 55 Sell Your Possessions: Luke 12:33 and the Greco-Roman Utopian Ideal Book Reviews 77 Murray Vasser 21 SOUTHEASTERN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW CONTENTS Michael Kruger, ed. A Biblical-Theological Introduction to the New Testament: The Gospel Realized .......................................................................... 89 ARTICLES Levi Baker Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Benjamin L. Merkle J. K. Elliott. A Bibliography of Greek New Testament Manuscripts ................. 91 Charles L. Quarles “Out of Egypt I Called My Son”: Intertextuality and Metalepsis in Matthew 2:15 ................................................................................................. 3 George H. van Kooten and Peter Barthel (eds). The Star of Bethlehem Charles L. Quarles and the Magi: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from Experts on the Ancient Near East, the Greco-Roman World, and Modern Astronomy ..................................... 93 Sell Your Possessions: Luke 12:33 and the Greco-Roman Ari Heinze Utopian Ideal ................................................................................................... 21 Murray Vasser John B. Cobb, Jr. Jesus’ Abba: The God Who Has Not Failed ...................... 95 Marc A. Pugliese The Curse of Cain Reconsidered: A Study of the Translation of min ha’adamah in Genesis 4:11a ..................................................................... 41 Keith T. Marriner. Following the Lamb: The Theme of Discipleship in the Todd Borger Book of Revelation ............................................................................................... 97 Michael L. Bryant Rescuing Adam: Three Approaches to Affirming a Historical Adam ... 55 Kenneth D. Keathley Andrew Christopher Smith. Fundamentalism, Fundraising, and the Transformation of the Southern Baptist Convention, 1919–1925 ........................ 99 Book Reviews .................................................................................................. 77 Nathan A. Finn Drew Hart. Trouble I’ve Seen: Changing the Way the Church Views BOOK REVIEWS Racism .............................................................................................................. 101 Brian Wintle, ed. South Asia Bible Commentary: A One-Volume Eric M. Washington Commentary on the Whole Bible .......................................................................... 77 Jonathan Leeman. Don’t Fire Your Church Members: The Case for George Robinson Congregationalism .............................................................................................. 104 Miles V. Van Pelt, ed. A Biblical-Theological Introduction to the Old Eric J. Thomas Testament: The Gospel Promised ......................................................................... 79 Megan Hill. Praying Together: The Priority and Privilege of Prayer in Our Benjamin S. Davis Homes, Communities, and Churches .................................................................. 106 T. Desmond Alexander. Exodus ................................................................... 81 Allen Jackson Mark F. Rooker Francis Landy, Leigh M. Trevaskis, and Bryan D. Bibb (eds.). Text, Time, and Temple: Literary, Historical and Ritual Studies in Leviticus ..... 83 G. Geoffrey Harper Matthew Newkirk. Just Deceivers. An Exploration of the Motif of Deception in the Books of Samuel ........................................................................ 85 H. H. Hardy II Nazek Khalid Matty. Sennacherib’s Campaign against Judah and Jerusalem in 701 B.C.: A Historical Reconstruction ............................................ 87 G. Geoffrey Harper STR 8.1 (Spring 2017): 1–2 2 SOUTHEASTERN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW possessions” should be understood as a command to relinquish all super- fluous possessions and embrace equality. In the third essay, “The Curse of Cain Reconsidered,” Todd Borger, Introduction associate professor of Old Testament and Hebrew at Southeastern Bap- tist Theological Seminary, takes on the traditional interpretation of Cain’s Benjamin L. Merkle curse which is typically rendered “You are cursed from the ground.” Dr. STR Editor Borger demonstrates that the context and grammar of the passage favor the translation “You are cursed more than the ground.” He then considers the implications of this interpretation. This volume of STR brings several changes to the journal. First, we The final essay in this issue, “Rescuing Adam: Three Approaches to have redesigned the front cover to be more in line with what would be Affirming a Historical Adam,” is by Kenneth D. Keathley, senior profes- expected from something associated with Southeastern Baptist Theolog- sor of Theology and director of the L. Russ Bush Center for Faith and ical Seminary. Second, we have moved the issues from Summer and Win- Culture at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. Dr. Keathley pro- ter to Spring and Fall. Because we are a seminary (and college), it makes vides an extremely helpful survey of three positions (concordist, semi- sense to produce issues consistent with our annual semester cycle. Issues concordist, and non-concordist) related to the historicity of Adam and will typically be posted on our website March 21 (Spring issue) and Sep- demonstrates why this is an important issue for evangelicals. tember 21 (Fall issue). Third, we have redesigned and relaunched our web- site (www.southeasternreview.com). All individual essays and entire vol- umes can now be downloaded for free. Consequently, we are no longer printing hard copies of the journal. Please subscribe to the journal on our website if you wish to receive an email reminder when a new issue is posted. The Spring issue of STR is typically un-themed. In this issue we have two New Testament essays, one Old Testament essay, and one essay that is cross-disciplinary. In the first essay, Charles L. Quarles, professor of New Testament and Biblical Theology at Southeastern Baptist Theologi- cal Seminary, addresses the citation of Hos 11:1 in Matt 2:15. He argues that Matthew correctly interprets the Hosea passage (“Out of Egypt I called my son”) as a reference to Israel’s exodus out of Egypt led by Mo- ses which then anticipated a future, eschatological exodus led by the Mes- siah. The second essay is by Murray Vasser, a PhD student at Asbury The- ological Seminary. Vasser’s essay, “Sell Your Possessions: Luke 12:33 and the Greco-Roman Utopian Ideal,” won first place in the 2016 SEBTS In- tersect Project PhD Symposium Competition sponsored by the Kern Family Foundation. The Symposium featured paper presentations from ten PhD students from around the world on issues related to the inter- section of faith, work, and economics. In his essay, Vasser seeks to answer the tension between Jesus’ command to “sell your possessions” and the fact that many Christians in the early church retained significant posses- sions. By using the insights of redaction criticism and the work of Abra- ham J. Malherbe, Vasser concludes that Jesus’ command to “sell your STR 8.1 (Spring 2017): 3–19 4 SOUTHEASTERN THEOLOGICAL REVIEW The recapitulation of Israel view sees Matthew’s use of Hos 11:1 as prompted by the notion of the Messiah’s corporate identification with “Out of Egypt I Called My Son”: Israel that results in him reliving major events in Israel’s history. 4 Thus Matthew applied Hos 11:1 to the Messiah on the basis of an “Israel typol- Intertextuality and Metalepsis in Matthew 2:15 ogy.” 5 The Messianic prophecy view (championed by Barnabas Lindars) suggests Charles L. Quarles that Matthew identified the Messiah as the “son” of Hos 11:1 under the Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary influence of a messianic interpretation of Num 24:7–9 suggested by the LXX. 6 Lindars suggested that Matthew interpreted Hos 11:1 against the Matthew rightly interpreted Hos 11:1 as a reference to the historic exodus that antici- background of the similar statement in Balaam’s oracle and concluded pated an eschatological exodus led by the Messiah. Matthew was attentive to the fact that Hosea referred to the Messiah. Matthean scholars David Hill and that Hosea repeatedly used the image of the Egyptian bondage to portray Israel’s As- Dale Allison and Old Testament scholar John Sailhamer have adopted, to syrian exile and thus utilized the image of the exodus to portray Israel’s restoration one degree or another, the view suggested by Lindars. 7 (Hos 2:14–15; 8:13; 9:6; 11:5). Like his Jewish contemporaries, Matthew recog- nized that the Messiah would fulfill the prophecy regarding the coming of a prophet like Moses (Deut 18:15–19) and thus would lead God’s people on the promised new ex- 79. According to Sailhamer, Erasmus claimed that Julian the Apostate was the odus from this continuing exile. Matthew quoted Hos 11:1 because he saw Jesus’ return first to challenge the legitimacy of Matthew’s interpretation of Hos 11:1 (“Hosea from Egypt as signaling the beginning of this new exodus. 11:1 and Matthew 2:15,” WTJ 63 [2001]: 87). Erasmus was apparently referring to a fragment