DOCSLIB.ORG

Scientific Taxidermy, US Natural History Museums

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scientific Taxidermy, US Natural History Museums “Strict Fidelity to Nature”: Scientific Taxidermy, U.S. Natural History Museums, and Craft Consensus, 1880s-1930s Jonathan David Grunert Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science and Technology Studies Mark V. Barrow, Jr., Chair Matthew R. Goodrum Matthew Wisnioski Eileen Crist Patzig September 27, 2019 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: taxidermy, natural history, museum, scientific representation, visual culture “Strict Fidelity to Nature”: Scientific Taxidermy, U.S. Natural History Museums, and Craft Consensus, 1880s-1930s Jonathan David Grunert ABSTRACT As taxidermy increased in prominence in American natural history museums in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the idea of trying to replicate nature through mounts and displays became increasingly central. Crude practices of overstuffing skins gave way to a focus on the artistic modelling of animal skins over a sculpted plaster and papier-mâché form to create scientifically accurate and aesthetically pleasing mounts, a technique largely developed at Ward’s Natural Science Establishment in Rochester, New York. Many of Ward’s taxidermists utilized their authority in taxidermy practices as they formally organized into the short-lived Society of American Taxidermists (1880-1883) before moving into positions in natural history museums across the United States. Through examinations of published and archival museum materials, as well as historic mounts, I argue that taxidermists at these museums reached an unspoken consensus concerning how their mounts would balance pleasing aesthetics with scientific accuracy, while adjusting their practices as they considered the priorities of numerous stakeholders. Taxidermists negotiated through administrative priorities, legacies of prominent craftsmen, and a battery of instructive materials, all claiming some authority as to what proper taxidermy could—and should—be. The shifts in taxidermy authority revealed truths about what taxidermy could mean, questions of how taxidermists identified themselves within the profession and to outsiders, practices for presenting taxidermy to museum visitors, and techniques for representing nature. This project traces the paths of consensus for developing techniques to construct museum taxidermy from the 1883 end of the S.A.T until the founding of the Technical Section of the American Association of Museums (AAM) in 1929. Two critics who book-end this project—Robert Wilson Shufeldt, an army doctor, naturalist, and museum critic, and Lawrence Vail Coleman, director of preparation and exhibition, American Museum of Natural History, and director of the American Association of Museums—identified similar characteristics that suggest a like-minded approach as to what constituted proper museum taxidermy among museum taxidermists. Museum taxidermy carried with it a set of characteristics: accuracy and a pleasing aesthetic for Shufeldt; feeling, unity, action, balance, reality, and size for Coleman. These two sets of criteria complemented each other as they reified consensus. What complicated this finding was that taxidermists themselves did not acknowledge them specifically, only relating to them in passing, if at all. Regardless, taxidermic practice seemed to be consistent across these decades. This study complicates the nature of scientific representation, in that it focuses a great deal on its artistry. Museum taxidermy is supposed to be an instructional tool, guiding museum visitors in the way they approach nature, and especially how they see animals, and focusing on teaching the science of animal behavior, biodiversity, and habitat, to name a few. It is a scientific object, representing the most up-to-date research in the field, but consensus surrounding it is not scientifically measurable. Instead, taxidermy consensus happened in hallways and back rooms (both literal and metaphorical), with little written down, and the mounts as the most substantial evidence that is had been achieved. Nevertheless, taxidermists negotiated the array of stakeholders present—museum administrators, naturalists, collectors, and the public—as they fashioned mounts that were both accurate and aesthetically pleasing representations of animal lives. “Strict Fidelity to Nature”: Scientific Taxidermy, U.S. Natural History Museums, and Craft Consensus, 1880s-1930s Jonathan David Grunert GENERAL AUDIENCE ABSTRACT In this project I look at museum taxidermy in United States natural history museums, from the 1880s to 1930s. In that 50-year span, taxidermy practices coalesced around a primary technique for mounting animal skins, using a wooden form and papier- mâ ché as the structure for stretching the skin over it. But there was more to this consensus than using the same techniques, as two critics who book-end this project—Robert Wilson Shufeldt, an army doctor, naturalist, museum critic, etc., and Lawrence Vail Coleman, director of preparation and exhibition, American Museum of Natural History, and director of the American Association of Museums—identified similar characteristics that suggest a like-minded approach as to what constituted proper museum taxidermy among museum taxidermists. I argue in this project that taxidermists reached an unspoken consensus around their craft that balanced scientific accuracy with a pleasing aesthetic, to achieve mounts that would be both scientifically meaningful and not off-putting to museum visitors. Museum taxidermy carried with it a set of characteristics: accuracy and a pleasing aesthetic for Shufeldt; feeling, unity, action, balance, reality, and size for Coleman. And these two complement each other as they reify consensus. What complicated this finding was that taxidermists themselves did not acknowledge them specifically, only relating to them in passing, if at all. Regardless, taxidermy seemed to be consistent across these decades. This study complicates the nature of scientific representation, in that it focuses a great deal on its artistic nature. Museum taxidermy is supposed to be an instructional tool, guiding museum visitors in the way they approach nature, and especially how they see animals. Museum taxidermy generally shies away from terrifying visitors with animal size and ferocity, focusing instead on teaching the science of animal behavior, biodiversity, and habitat, to name a few. In this sense, it is a scientific object, representing the most up-to- date research in the field. Consensus in the realm of taxidermy, and in scientific representation more broadly, is not scientific consensus, but more consistent with an artistic approach, like a posteriori recognitions of characteristics unique to artists or artistic movements. Taxidermy consensus happened in hallways and back rooms, with little written down, and the mounts as the most substantial evidence. Nevertheless, taxidermists negotiated the array of stakeholders present—museum administrators, naturalists, collectors, and the public—as they consistently made these mounts both accurate and aesthetically pleasing. And they still make sense when we see them, as they can be repurposed to tell new stories consistent with current understandings of animal lives. vii DEDICATION This project is dedicated to Lissa, for being a motivator, inquirer, and partner. This paper is as close as we’ll get to having taxidermy in the house; I promise. viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It would be disingenuous to take full credit for this project. At least, to take it without many caveats. A project of this scale is not something that one person can undertake alone. Indeed, many people contributed to the formation of this work, in innumerable ways. Librarians get a lot of thanks in these acknowledgements, and not without due cause. As one trained in librarianship, I have appreciated the gratitude of researchers who have recognized the librarian’s efforts in the process of a project. As one of those researchers, I appreciate the amount of work that librarians do, indeed, put into projects that are not their own. More, though, librarians get credit for helping find information, artifacts, and publications that elude even the craftiest researchers. However, their enthusiasm for projects is encouraging, and as important to the formation of ideas and finishing a project as is finding those bits of information. I’d especially like to extend my sincerest and most enthusiastic gratitude to three sets of librarians. First, librarians at Virginia Tech, Colorado State University-Pueblo, and SUNY Geneseo were encouraging and helpful in different ways. Virginia Tech University Libraries gave me my first librarian experience, which is irreplaceable. Librarians there, especially Bruce Pencek and Scott Fralin, were instrumental in helping me form research ideas and figure out how best to pursue them in a way that was both manageable and interesting. CSU-Pueblo and SUNY Geneseo hired me despite my being ABD, and their Libraries gave me time and encouragement to finish this project. Interlibrary loan shark Kenny McKenzie, ix in Pueblo, helped to retrieve materials, both historical and current; without these resources, this project would not have been possible. Second, archivists and special collections librarians were indispensable to the completion of this project. Notably, Ellen Alers and Pam Henson at Smithsonian Institution Archives helped navigate the tremendous collection in Washington, D.C., as well as providing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Faster Registration Form
    / & NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior - - National Park Service - •- -' f\VM;OMAl NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES FASTER REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Hornaday Camp other name/site number: 246F362 2. Location street & number: Montana Highway 200 not for publication: n/a vicinity: n/a city/town: Sand Springs state: Montana code: MT county: Gar field code: 033 zip code: 59077 3. Classification Ownership of Property: private Category of Property: site Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing ____ ____ building(s) 1 ____ sites ____ ____ structures ____ ____ objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing: n/a 4. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. ____ See continuation sheet. Signature of certifying official U 0 Date 0 State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria. __ See continuation sheet. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 5. National Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property is: v/ entered in the National Register (LuJfflWfftyjL,(I ' MU.hD __ See continuation sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob's Wildlife Taxidermy Celebrating 30Th Anniversary Orefield Landmark Ready for Another Hunting Season
    Bob's Wildlife Taxidermy Celebrating 30th Anniversary Orefield Landmark Ready for another Hunting Season Fall hunting seasons are just around the corner, and thousands of Lehigh Valley sportsmen will soon head afield in search of a trophy. For those hunters lucky enough to bag the buck, bear or bird of a lifetime, Orefield taxidermist Bob V. Danenhower Sr. is ready to preserve your memories. Danenhower said it's hard to believe it's been a quarter century since Bob's Wildlife Taxidermy opened its doors. His passion for wildlife dates to his childhood, and he began studying taxidermy at the age of 13, taking mail order courses from the Northwest School of Taxidermy. “I would have to work in my dad's business, Humphrey’s Hydraulics, to earn enough money to order my next lesson,” Danenhower recalled. “It seemed to take forever, because Dad didn’t pay so well.” In the 70s, Danenhower worked for Laros Taxidermy in Allentown, where he learned the finer points of wildlife art from veteran taxidermist Dick Laros. “I had to wait until I was 18 to take my taxidermy test,” he said. “Eighteen was state law at that time, and I was the first 18-year-old ever to be licensed in Pennsylvania.” Becoming a full-time taxidermist is no easy task, especially when you start with nothing but some cheap hand tools, knowledge and a strong work ethic. “There were several lean years when we really looked forward to the local game warden dropping off a fresh, road-killed deer so we could fill the freezer with venison,” Danenhower said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Boar from San Rossore
    209.qxp 01-12-2009 12:04 Side 55 UDSTILLINGSHISTORIER OG UDSTILLINGSETIK ● NORDISK MUSEOLOGI 2009 ● 2, S. 55-79 Speaking to the Eye: The wild boar from San Rossore LIV EMMA THORSEN* Abstract: The article discusses a taxidermy work of a wild boar fighting two dogs. The tableau was made in 1824 by the Italian scientist Paolo Savi, director of the Natural History Museum in Pisa from 1823-1840. The point of departure is the sense of awe this brilliantly produced tableau evokes in the spectator. If an object could talk, what does the wild boar communicate? Stuffed animals are objects that operate in natural history exhibitions as well in several other contexts. They resist a standard classification, belonging to neither nature nor culture. The wild boar in question illustrates this ambiguity. To decode the tale of the boar, it is establis- hed as a centre in a network that connects Savi’s scientific and personal knowled- ge, the wild boar as a noble trophy, the development of the wild boar hunt in Tus- cany, perceptions of the boar and the connection between science and art. Key words: Natural history museum, taxidermy, wild boar, wild boar hunt, the wild boar in art, ornithology, natural history in Tuscany, Museo di Storia Naturale e del Territorio, Paolo Savi. In 1821, a giant male wild boar was killed at There is a complex history to this wild boar. San Rossore, the hunting property of the We have to understand the important role this Grand Duke of Toscana. It was killed during a species played in Italian and European hun- hunt arranged in honour of prominent guests ting tradition, the link between natural histo- of Ferdinand III.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Museum with Roosevelt Michael Ross Canfield Enjoys a Chronicle of the Statesman’S Natural-History Legacy
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS ZOOLOGY In the museum with Roosevelt Michael Ross Canfield enjoys a chronicle of the statesman’s natural-history legacy. he head of a Cape buffalo presents killed animals. This contradiction has exer- itself just inside the door of Theodore cised many. Teasing apart aspects of ethics, Roosevelt’s historical home, Sagamore morality, manliness and environmentalism THill, on Long Island, New York. A few steps in Roosevelt’s approach to collecting, Lunde further in are mounted rhino­ceros horns, reveals how the president’s impulses over- then a trophy room framed by elephant tusks. lapped. He hunted for meat and sport — a This is, in effect, the personal natural-history common pursuit among the wealthy on both museum of the explorer, soldier and 26th US sides of the Atlantic — as well as science. president. Roosevelt also donated hundreds of That scientific strand was strong. Lunde specimens to the American Museum of Natu- describes how Roosevelt was able to “hold LIBRARY/ALAMY PICTURE EVANS MARY ral History in New York and the Smithsonian specimens in his hand”, whether bear, cou- Institution in Washington DC. Between these gar or bird, to hone his observational acuity. two kinds of museum — the private and the Roosevelt even chastised hunters who did not public — we find the Roosevelt of The Natu- learn in this way and report results appropri- ralist by Darrin Lunde, manager of the Smith- ately, because information could easily be lost sonian’s mammal collections. to science. Other areas of his life, particularly Lunde’s narrative stretches from Roosevelt’s his approach to politics and policymaking, youth to his return from a scientific safari show the imprint of these habits of observing, in what is now Kenya in 1909–10, a decade collecting disparate elements and informa- before his death.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Short Histories of the Bison in Golden Gate Park 1 If You Walk
    “When we choose a plot to order our environmental stories we give them a unity that neither nature nor the past possesses.” -- William Cronon “We have had our historians, too, and they have held over the dark backward of time their divining rods and conjured out of it what they wanted.” --Van Wyk Brooks 12 Short Histories of the Bison in Golden Gate Park 1 If you walk westward through Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, along John F. Kennedy Drive, and walk past the Victorian cupcake of the arboretum, past the cement rectangle where people roller skate in short shorts to a staticky boombox, past the copper facade of the deYoung museum, past the waterfall, past the meadows where people gather for soccer matches and family reunions and Renaissance fairs, you will find the bison. The further away you move away from the park’s entrance, the more the manicured landscape surrounding the park’s main buildings buckles and dissolves into something more improvisational. The park’s eucalyptus trees, steadfast since they were first planted in their determination to kill every plant not themselves, let loose drifts of fragrant, acid leaves. The hand of gardner is undone by the hand of gopher and the smooth green turf laid down for the benefit of soccer leagues is pocked with busy holes ringed with coronas of freshly kicked dirt. And so you will have to look. It is not a landscape that invites lingering and the bison - or buffalo, which is taxonomically inaccurate but which it still somehow feels correct to call them - are easy to miss.
    [Show full text]
  • What You Should Know About a Federal Migratory Bird Taxidermy Permit
    WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT A FEDERAL MIGRATORY BIRD TAXIDERMY PERMIT A Federal Migratory Bird Taxidermy Permit will authorize you to mount or otherwise perform taxidermy work on migratory birds, their parts, nests or eggs, belonging to someone else. The conditions of a Federal Taxidermy Permit are very specific. You should review Title 50 Parts 10, 13, 20 (subparts A-B, D-J) and 21.24 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). You are responsible for reviewing and understanding these regulations before you request and accept a permit. These regulations can be found on our website at: https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and- regulations/permits/permit-policies-and-regulations.php. Refer to Taxidermists and Federal Law for more information. Below is a review of several sections pertinent to a Federal Migratory Bird Taxidermy Permit. 1. Can I mount migratory game birds with a Federal Taxidermy permit? Yes. You can receive and mount migratory game birds taken and possessed in accordance with applicable Federal and State hunting regulations. All such birds must be properly tagged as required by 50 CFR 20.36. The tag may be removed during taxidermy operations but must be retained and reattached after mounting, and must remain attached until the specimen is delivered to the owner. (See 50 CFR 21.24(d)(2)) 2. Can I mount and sell captive-reared migratory waterfowl? Yes. You can sell properly marked, captive-reared migratory waterfowl that you have acquired from a propagator who has a Federal Migratory Bird Waterfowl Sale and Disposal permit. The propagator must give you a completed Notice of Transfer or Sale of Migratory Waterfowl form (Form 3-186) at the time of the transfer and you must maintain this form in your files.
    [Show full text]
  • The Club Or “Pundit Club”(1854 – Present)
    THE “PUNDIT CLUB” A GUIDED TOUR THROUGH MOUNT HOPE CEMETERY ROCHESTER, NEW YORK SEPTEMBER 2018 DOCENT SCRIPT !1 This guided tour is sponsored by Friends of Mount Hope Cemetery and Lewis Henry Morgan at 200, a critical appreciation of Morgan’s numerous legacies. Lewis Henry Morgan at 200 is a collaboration between University of Rochester departments and community partners that features public talks and film screenings as well as exhibits and a digital humanities project. This docent script was written by University of Rochester students Anna Remus, Naomi Ruetz and Sam Schact, and their supervisor, Robert J. Foster, Professor of Anthropology and Visual and Cultural Studies. For more information about Morgan life and works, please visit the project website at: http://rbscp.digitalscholar.rochester.edu/wp/Morgan200/ !2 CONTENTS Lewis Henry Morgan (1818-1881) ..................................................................4 The Club or “Pundit Club”(1854 – present) ...................................................8 Fun Facts about The Pundit Club ................................................................10 Lewis Henry Morgan (1818-1881) ................................................................12 Edward Mott Moore (1814 – 1902) ...............................................................16 Fun Facts about Edward Mott Moore: ........................................................18 Henry Augustus Ward (1834 – 1906) ............................................................19 Fun Facts about Henry Augustus Ward .......................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Ward's Natural Science Establishment Papers Addition
    ward's_natural_science_establishment_papers_addition This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 25, 2021. English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Rare Books, Special Collections, and Preservation, River Campus Libraries, University of Rochester Rush Rhees Library Second Floor, Room 225 Rochester, NY 14627-0055 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.rochester.edu/spaces/rbscp ward's_natural_science_establishment_papers_addition Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents note ............................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Series I: Historical material .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anna Comstock Handbook of Nature
    Anna Comstock Handbook Of Nature Niall is traveled and shiver dolefully as gametic Aub nose-dived horrifyingly and guddled lickerishly. Scrap and heterocercal Chaim imbricating some biggie so lots! Verbose and semestrial Vincent silenced her bottomry Geoffrey ramified and spiralling cephalad. We are not evaluating any big garden birdwatch, even knew the. Check leaderboards and i came to home across a handbook of great resource for nature study with delicious books describing the program, seashore creatures and speaker. 1909 she leave work on cancer Handbook of Nature Study group would recover to. Scholars believe, well we substitute, that between work health important reply to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to pick public. Cornell university press fosters a second printing. Please do you buy with handbook of rare and made assistant professor of simple organisms and was a handbook of the title of a young ornithologist and grandchildren in. Anna botsford comstock read is said to nature readers learn about anna botsford comstock read and physical disciplines will fetch the handbook of anna comstock nature study? Handbook of various Study Rainbow Resource. Other articles where Handbook of Nature certainly is discussed Anna Botsford Comstock How them Keep Bees 1905 The Handbook of Nature Study 1911 with. Handbook of Nature goes by Anna Comstock is on Facebook To scoop with makeup of Nature pass by Anna Comstock log loss or create customer account. Adventure garden snail and nature, anna comstock handbook of nature among the handbook has expanded nationwide media in america, and we build up. Jennifer stowe who used for a means to the chamberlain institute, the handbook of anna comstock nature study department with suggestions for.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Look at Dead Animals? Taxidermy in Contemporary Art by Vanessa Mae Bateman Submitted to OCAD University in Partial Fulfillme
    Why Look at Dead Animals? Taxidermy in Contemporary Art by Vanessa Mae Bateman Submitted to OCAD University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Contemporary Art, Design, and New Media Art Histories Vanessa Mae Bateman, May 2013 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. ! Copyright Notice This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. You are free to: Share – To copy, distribute and transmit the written work. You are not free to: Share any images used in this work under copyright unless noted as belonging to the public domain. Under the following conditions: Attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial – You may not use those work for commercial purposes. Non-Derivative Works – You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. With the understanding that: Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Public Domain — Where the work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Biocentric Thought and How Changes In
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Honors Program in History (Senior Honors Theses) Department of History 4-20-2007 "When Nature Holds the Mastery": The Development of Biocentric Thought in Industrial America Aviva R. Horrow University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] A Senior Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in History. Faculty Advisor: Kathy Peiss This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/hist_honors/7 For more information, please contact [email protected]. "When Nature Holds the Mastery": The Development of Biocentric Thought in Industrial America Abstract This thesis explores the concept of "biocentrism" within the context of American environmental thought at the turn of the twentieth century. Biocentrism is the view that all life and elements of the universe are equally valuable and that humanity is not the center of existence. It encourages people to view themselves as part of the greater ecosystem rather than as conquerors of nature. The development of this alternative world view in America begins in mid-nineteenth to early twentieth century, during a period of rapid industrialization and urbanization as some Americans began to notice the destruction they wrought on the environment and their growing disconnect with nature. Several individuals during this time introduced the revolutionary idea of biocentrism including: John Muir, Liberty Hyde Bailey, Nathaniel Southgate Shaler and Edward Payson Evans. This thesis traces the development of their biocentrism philosophies, attributing it to several factors: more mainstream reactions to the changes including the Conservation movement and Preservation movements, new spiritual and religious approaches towards nature, and Darwin's theory of evolution which spurred the development of the field of ecology and the concept of evolving ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Section of a Successful Application
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Office of Digital Humanities program application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/odh/humanities-open-book-program for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Office of Digital Humanities staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Humanities Open Book Program – Cornell University Institution: Cornell University Project Director: Dean J. Smith Grant Program: Humanities Open Book Program 1. Table of Contents 2. List of Participants ...................................................................................................... 2-1 3. Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 4. Narrative a. Intellectual Significance of
    [Show full text]