Characterization of Mice with Altered Dopamine Transporter and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 Levels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characterization of Mice with Altered Dopamine Transporter and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 Levels Characterization of Mice with Altered Dopamine Transporter and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 Levels by Shababa Tanzeel Masoud A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto © Copyright by Shababa Tanzeel Masoud 2017 Characterization of Mice with Altered Dopamine Transporter and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 Levels Shababa Tanzeel Masoud Doctor of Philosophy Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter that regulates motor coordination and dysfunction of the dopamine system gives rise to Parkinson’s disease. Nigrostriatal dopamine neurons are vulnerable to various genetic and environmental insults, suggesting that these cells are inherently at-risk. A cell-specific risk factor for these neurons is the neurotransmitter, dopamine itself. If intracellular dopamine is not appropriately sequestered into vesicles, it can accumulate in the cytosol. Cytosolic dopamine is highly reactive and can trigger oxidative stress, leading to cellular toxicity. Cytosolic dopamine levels are modulated by the plasma membrane dopamine transporter (DAT) that takes up dopamine from the extracellular space, and the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) that stores dopamine into vesicles. In this thesis, we altered DAT and VMAT2 levels to investigate the detrimental consequences of potentially amplifying cytosolic dopamine in transgenic mice. Project 1 focused on selective over-expression of DAT in dopaminergic cells of transgenic mice (DAT-tg). DAT-tg mice displayed phenotypes of dopaminergic damage: increased dopamine-specific oxidative stress, L-DOPA-reversible fine motor deficits and enhanced sensitivity to toxicant insult, suggesting that increasing DAT- mediated dopamine uptake is detrimental for dopamine cells. As an extension of Project 1, ii Project 2 focused on mice that simultaneously over-express DAT and under-express VMAT2 (DAT-tg/VMAT2-kd mice). These animals were hypothesized to demonstrate exacerbated dopaminergic toxicity due to buildup of cytosolic dopamine caused by increased uptake and decreased packaging. While DAT-tg/VMAT2-kd mice displayed detrimental phenotypes (poor survival, decreased body weight, reduced dopamine tissue content and release) and compensatory changes (increased dopamine receptors and metabolism), they did not show dopamine cell loss. This is due to unexpected loss of phenotypes in DAT-tg mice from a new colony that no longer displayed dopaminergic neurodegeneration. Thus, instead of Parkinsonian behavior, DAT-tg/VMAT2-kd mice showed novel phenotypes such as hyperactivity and improved fine-motor and cognitive skills compared to other genotypes. DAT-tg/VMAT2-kd mice were also highly sensitive to amphetamine-induced locomotion. Hence, in the absence of neurodegeneration, altered DAT and VMAT2 levels produced unique behavioral changes in DAT-tg/VMAT2-kd mice, shedding light on the complex function of the dopamine system. Collectively, these studies demonstrate how perturbations in dopamine compartmentalization can impact dopamine homeostasis and behavior. iii Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Ali Salahpour, for his immense guidance and mentorship during my Ph.D. As one of his first students, I have had the privilege of learning from him directly and seeing the lab grow over the years. His enthusiasm for science, positive outlook, understanding nature and approachability make him a truly unique supervisor. To my committee members, Drs. Peter G. Wells, José Nobrega, W. M. Burnham and David S. Riddick: you have been my guiding light throughout this Ph.D. You have challenged, supported and encouraged me. I am eternally grateful for having the best Ph.D. supervisory committee I could ever hope for. A special thank you to Dr. David S. Riddick for playing the dual role of my co-supervisor and thesis reader. You have always had the time to check up on me, provide constructive criticism and guide me in the right direction. Also, a special thank you to Dr. W. M Burnham – I started my scientific journey in your lab as a 4th year project student and since then, I have shared a great working relationship with you as the TA for PCL475. Thank you for your kindness and for always having my best interest in mind. To Dr. Amy Ramsey, thank you for offering your expertise and advice throughout my Ph.D. To our collaborators: Drs. Gary W. Miller, Jason Richardson, Jonathan Brotchie and Andrei Starostin – I truly appreciate your invaluable technical help with my projects. I would like to gratefully acknowledge Dr. Salah El Mestikawy for being my external examiner. A special mention for Lien Nguyen, my undergraduate project student, for her useful contribution to these experiments. I am also grateful for my sources of funding from Parkinson Society of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the University of Toronto. Wendy Horsfall, you are the backbone of our lab – I cannot thank you enough for sharing your knowledge and being so patient with us. Marija Milenkovic and Dr. Laura Vecchio, thank you for helping me every day and being my voice of reason. To all members of the Salahpour and Ramsey labs, I am grateful to have shared this journey with you. Finally, I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to my family. To my parents, Chowdhury A. Masud and Shabina M. Masud - you never doubted me even for a moment. You stood by me as pillars of strength throughout all my struggles and I will forever remain grateful. To Nafees, you supported me in every way imaginable. Thank you for being my teammate. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................v List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................x List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xiii List of Appendices ....................................................................................................................... xiv List of Publications ........................................................................................................................xv List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... xvi Chapter 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Statement of Research Problem ...........................................................................................1 1.2 Literature Review.................................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Dopamine function in the brain ................................................................................2 1.2.1.1 Nigrostriatal pathway and movement ........................................................3 1.2.1.2 Other dopaminergic pathways ...................................................................8 1.2.2 Dopamine homeostasis .............................................................................................9 1.2.2.1 Synthesis ....................................................................................................9 1.2.2.2 Release .....................................................................................................11 1.2.2.3 Degradation .............................................................................................12 1.2.3 Dopamine transport ................................................................................................14 1.2.3.1 Plasma membrane transport ....................................................................14 1.2.3.2 Vesicular membrane transport .................................................................15 1.2.4 Dopamine compartmentalization and its effects ....................................................17 1.2.4.1 Extracellular dopamine ............................................................................17 1.2.4.1.1 Dopamine Receptors............................................................... 17 v 1.2.4.2 Intracellular dopamine .............................................................................20 1.2.4.2.1 Cytosolic dopamine ................................................................ 20 Reactivity .................................................................. 21 Toxicity .................................................................... 24 1.2.5 Classical drugs that interact with the dopamine system .........................................28 1.2.5.1 Enzyme ligands .......................................................................................29 1.2.5.2 DAT ligands ............................................................................................30 1.2.5.3 VMAT2 ligands .......................................................................................33 1.2.5.4 Dopamine receptor ligands ......................................................................35
Recommended publications
  • Experimental Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’S Disease: a Review of the Evidence
    Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Experimental Dopamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of the Evidence This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Journal of Experimental Pharmacology Thomas Müller Abstract: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most chronic neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Deficit of monoamines, particularly dopamine, causes an individually varying Department of Neurology, St. Joseph Hospital Berlin-Weissensee, Berlin, compilation of motor and non-motor features. Constraint of presynaptic uptake extends 13088, Germany monoamine stay in the synaptic cleft. This review discusses possible benefits of dopamine reuptake inhibition for the treatment of PD. Translation of this pharmacologic principle into positive clinical study results failed to date. Past clinical trial designs did not consider a mandatory, concomitant stable inhibition of glial monoamine turnover, i.e. with mono­ amine oxidase B inhibitors. These studies focused on improvement of motor behavior and levodopa associated motor complications, which are fluctuations of motor and non-motor behavior. Future clinical investigations in early, levodopa- and dopamine agonist naïve patients shall also aim on alleviation of non-motor symptoms, like fatigue, apathy or cognitive slowing. Oral levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor application is inevitably necessary with advance of PD. Monoamine reuptake (MRT) inhibition improves the efficacy of levodopa, the blood brain barrier crossing metabolic precursor of dopamine. The pulsatile brain delivery pattern of orally administered levodopa containing formulations results in synaptic dopamine variability. Ups and downs of dopamine counteract the physiologic principle of continuous neurotransmission, particularly in nigrostriatal, respectively meso­ corticolimbic pathways, both of which regulate motor respectively non-motor behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Addictions and the Brain
    9/18/2012 Addictions and the Brain TAAP Conference September 14, 2012 Acknowledgements • La Hacienda Treatment Center • American Society of Addiction Medicine • National Institute of Drug Abuse © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 1 9/18/2012 Definition • A primary, progressive biochemical, psychosocial, genetically transmitted chronic disease of relapse who’s hallmarks are denial, loss of control and unmanageability. DSM IV Criteria for dependency: At least 3 of the 7 below 1. Withdrawal 2. Tolerance 3. The substance is taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended. 4. There is a persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control substance use. 5. A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance, use the substance, or recover from its effects. 6. Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of the substance use. 7. The substance use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance. © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 2 9/18/2012 Dispute between behavior and disease Present understanding of the Hypothalamus location of the disease hypothesis. © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 3 9/18/2012 © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 4 9/18/2012 © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 5 9/18/2012 Dispute regarding behavior versus disease © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 6 9/18/2012 © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Upregulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Α And
    Upregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and the lipid metabolism pathway promotes carcinogenesis of ampullary cancer Chih-Yang Wang, Ying-Jui Chao, Yi-Ling Chen, Tzu-Wen Wang, Nam Nhut Phan, Hui-Ping Hsu, Yan-Shen Shan, Ming-Derg Lai 1 Supplementary Table 1. Demographics and clinical outcomes of five patients with ampullary cancer Time of Tumor Time to Age Differentia survival/ Sex Staging size Morphology Recurrence recurrence Condition (years) tion expired (cm) (months) (months) T2N0, 51 F 211 Polypoid Unknown No -- Survived 193 stage Ib T2N0, 2.41.5 58 F Mixed Good Yes 14 Expired 17 stage Ib 0.6 T3N0, 4.53.5 68 M Polypoid Good No -- Survived 162 stage IIA 1.2 T3N0, 66 M 110.8 Ulcerative Good Yes 64 Expired 227 stage IIA T3N0, 60 M 21.81 Mixed Moderate Yes 5.6 Expired 16.7 stage IIA 2 Supplementary Table 2. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of an ampullary cancer microarray using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). This table contains only pathways with p values that ranged 0.0001~0.05. KEGG Pathway p value Genes Pentose and 1.50E-04 UGT1A6, CRYL1, UGT1A8, AKR1B1, UGT2B11, UGT2A3, glucuronate UGT2B10, UGT2B7, XYLB interconversions Drug metabolism 1.63E-04 CYP3A4, XDH, UGT1A6, CYP3A5, CES2, CYP3A7, UGT1A8, NAT2, UGT2B11, DPYD, UGT2A3, UGT2B10, UGT2B7 Maturity-onset 2.43E-04 HNF1A, HNF4A, SLC2A2, PKLR, NEUROD1, HNF4G, diabetes of the PDX1, NR5A2, NKX2-2 young Starch and sucrose 6.03E-04 GBA3, UGT1A6, G6PC, UGT1A8, ENPP3, MGAM, SI, metabolism
    [Show full text]
  • Poisons and Narcotic Drugs (Amendment) Ordinance 1988
    AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY Poisons and Narcotic Drugs (Amendment) Ordinance 1988 No. 96 of 1988 I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Ordinance under the Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910. Dated 15 December 1988 N. M. STEPHEN Governor-General By His Excellency’s Command, CLYDE HOLDING Minister of State for the Arts and Territories An Ordinance to amend the Poisons and Narcotic Drugs Ordinance 1978 Short title 1. This Ordinance may be cited as the Poisons and Narcotic Drugs (Amendment) Ordinance 1988.1 Commencement 2. This Ordinance commences on such date as is fixed by the Minister by notice in the Gazette. Principal Ordinance 3. In this Ordinance, “Principal Ordinance” means the Poisons and Narcotic Drugs Ordinance 1978.2 (Ord. 79/88)—Cat. No. Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au 2 Poisons and Narcotic Drugs (Amendment) No. 96, 1988 Substances to which Division applies 4. Section 27B of the Principal Ordinance is amended by adding at the end the following paragraphs: “; (f) follicle stimulating hormone; (g) luteinising hormone; (h) thalidomide.”. Grant of authorisation 5. Section 27E of the Principal Ordinance is amended— (a) by omitting from paragraph (1) (a) “or cyclofenil” and substituting “, cyclofenil, follicle stimulating hormone or luteinising hormone”; (b) by omitting from paragraph (1) (b) “and”; and (c) by adding at the end of subsection (1) the following word and paragraph: “; and (d) in the case of an application that relates to thalidomide— the applicant is a specialist physician with no less than 5 years’ experience in the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum.”.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf; Chi 2015 DPP Air in Cars.Pdf; Dodson 2014 DPP Dust CA.Pdf; Kasper-Sonnenberg 2014 Phth Metabolites.Pdf; EU Cosmetics Regs 2009.Pdf
    Bouge, Cathy (ECY) From: Nancy Uding <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 10:24 AM To: Steward, Kara (ECY) Cc: Erika Schreder Subject: Comments re. 2016 CSPA Rule Update - DPP Attachments: DPP 131-18-0 exposure.pdf; Chi 2015 DPP air in cars.pdf; Dodson 2014 DPP dust CA.pdf; Kasper-Sonnenberg 2014 phth metabolites.pdf; EU Cosmetics Regs 2009.pdf Please accept these comments from Toxic-Free Future concerning the exposure potential of DPP for consideration during the 2016 CSPA Rule update. Regards, Nancy Uding -- Nancy Uding Grants & Research Specialist Toxic-Free Future 206-632-1545 ext.123 http://toxicfreefuture.org 1 JES-00888; No of Pages 9 JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES XX (2016) XXX– XXX Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/jes Determination of 15 phthalate esters in air by gas-phase and particle-phase simultaneous sampling Chenchen Chi1, Meng Xia1, Chen Zhou1, Xueqing Wang1,2, Mili Weng1,3, Xueyou Shen1,4,⁎ 1. College of Environmental & Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China 2. Zhejiang National Radiation Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310011, China 3. School of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 310058, China 4. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Hangzhou 310058, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Based on previous research, the sampling and analysis methods for phthalate esters (PAEs) Received 24 December 2015 were improved by increasing the sampling flow of indoor air from 1 to 4 L/min, shortening the Revised 14 January 2016 sampling duration from 8 to 2 hr.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.7.2011 SEC(2011)
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.7.2011 SEC(2011) 912 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER on the assessment of the functioning of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA on the information exchange, risk assessment and control of new psychoactive substances Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION on the assessment of the functioning of Council Decision 2005/387/JHA on the information exchange, risk assessment and control of new psychoactive substances {COM(2011) 430 final} EN EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................3 2. Methodology.................................................................................................................4 3. Key findings from the 2002 evaluation of the Joint Action on synthetic drugs ...........5 4. Overview of notifications, types of substances and trends at EU level 2005-2010......7 5. Other EU legislation relevant for the regulation of new psychoactive substances.....12 6. Functioning of the Council Decision on new psychoactive substances .....................16 7. Findings of the survey among Member States............................................................17 7.1. Assessment of the Council Decision ..........................................................................17 7.2. Stages in the functioning of the Council Decision .....................................................18 7.3. National responses to new psychoactive substances ..................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Compositions and Methods for Selective Delivery of Oligonucleotide Molecules to Specific Neuron Types
    (19) TZZ ¥Z_T (11) EP 2 380 595 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 26.10.2011 Bulletin 2011/43 A61K 47/48 (2006.01) C12N 15/11 (2006.01) A61P 25/00 (2006.01) A61K 49/00 (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 10382087.4 A61K 51/00 (22) Date of filing: 19.04.2010 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Alvarado Urbina, Gabriel AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Nepean Ontario K2G 4Z1 (CA) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL • Bortolozzi Biassoni, Analia Alejandra PT RO SE SI SK SM TR E-08036, Barcelona (ES) Designated Extension States: • Artigas Perez, Francesc AL BA ME RS E-08036, Barcelona (ES) • Vila Bover, Miquel (71) Applicant: Nlife Therapeutics S.L. 15006 La Coruna (ES) E-08035, Barcelona (ES) (72) Inventors: (74) Representative: ABG Patentes, S.L. • Montefeltro, Andrés Pablo Avenida de Burgos 16D E-08014, Barcelon (ES) Edificio Euromor 28036 Madrid (ES) (54) Compositions and methods for selective delivery of oligonucleotide molecules to specific neuron types (57) The invention provides a conjugate comprising nucleuc acid toi cell of interests and thus, for the treat- (i) a nucleic acid which is complementary to a target nu- ment of diseases which require a down-regulation of the cleic acid sequence and which expression prevents or protein encoded by the target nucleic acid as well as for reduces expression of the target nucleic acid and (ii) a the delivery of contrast agents to the cells for diagnostic selectivity agent which is capable of binding with high purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Knockdown of TASK3 Potassium Channel in Monoamine
    Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript Fullana et al - TASK3.docx 1 Research Article – Molecular Neurobiology 2 3 Selective Knockdown of TASK3 Potassium Channel in Monoamine 4 Neurons: A New Therapeutic Approach for Depression 5 M Neus Fullana1,2,3*, Albert Ferrés-Coy1,2,3*, Jorge E Ortega3,4, Esther Ruiz-Bronchal1,2,3, Verónica 6 Paz1,2,3, J Javier Meana3,4, Francesc Artigas1,2,3 and Analia Bortolozzi1,2,3 7 8 1Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain 9 2Department of Neurochemistry and Neuropharmacology, IIBB-CSIC (Consejo Superior de 10 Investigaciones Científicas), Barcelona, Spain. 11 3Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), ISCIII, Madrid, Spain. 12 4Department of Pharmacology, University of Basque Country UPV/EHU and BioCruces Health 13 Research Institute, Bizkaia, Spain 14 15 NF* and AF-C* contributed equally to this work. 16 For correspondence: Analia Bortolozzi, Department of Neurochemistry and Neuropharmacology 17 (IIBB-CSIC), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Rosello 161, 18 Barcelona 08036, Spain. Tel: +34 93638313 Fax: +34 933638301 E-mail: 19 [email protected] 20 21 22 23 Running title: Intranasal delivery of conjugated TASK3-siRNA 24 25 26 1 Abstract 2 Current pharmacological treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) are severely compromised 3 by both slow action and limited efficacy. RNAi strategies have been used to evoke antidepressant-like 4 effects faster than classical drugs. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA), we herein show that TASK3 5 potassium channel knockdown in monoamine neurons induces antidepressant-like responses in mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Parkinson’s Disease Volume 2015, Article ID 609428, 71 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/609428 Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease Philippe Huot,1,2,3 Susan H. Fox,1,2 and Jonathan M. Brotchie1 1 Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8 2Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399BathurstStreet,Toronto,ON,CanadaM5T2S8 3Department of Pharmacology and Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, UniversitedeMontr´ eal´ and Centre Hospitalier de l’UniversitedeMontr´ eal,´ Montreal,´ QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan M. Brotchie; [email protected] Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 26 December 2014 Academic Editor: Maral M. Mouradian Copyright © 2015 Philippe Huot et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The motor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are secondary to a dopamine deficiency in the striatum. However, the degenerative process in PD is not limited to the dopaminergic system and also affects serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons. Because they can increase monoamine levels throughout the brain, monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MAUIs) represent potential therapeutic agents in PD. However, they are seldom used in clinical practice other than as antidepressants and wake-promoting agents. This review article summarises all of the available literature on use of 50 MAUIs in PD. The compounds are divided according to their relative potency for each of the monoamine transporters.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Patients with Substance Use Disorders Second Edition
    PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Substance Use Disorders Second Edition WORK GROUP ON SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS Herbert D. Kleber, M.D., Chair Roger D. Weiss, M.D., Vice-Chair Raymond F. Anton Jr., M.D. To n y P. G e o r ge , M .D . Shelly F. Greenfield, M.D., M.P.H. Thomas R. Kosten, M.D. Charles P. O’Brien, M.D., Ph.D. Bruce J. Rounsaville, M.D. Eric C. Strain, M.D. Douglas M. Ziedonis, M.D. Grace Hennessy, M.D. (Consultant) Hilary Smith Connery, M.D., Ph.D. (Consultant) This practice guideline was approved in December 2005 and published in August 2006. A guideline watch, summarizing significant developments in the scientific literature since publication of this guideline, may be available in the Psychiatric Practice section of the APA web site at www.psych.org. 1 Copyright 2010, American Psychiatric Association. APA makes this practice guideline freely available to promote its dissemination and use; however, copyright protections are enforced in full. No part of this guideline may be reproduced except as permitted under Sections 107 and 108 of U.S. Copyright Act. For permission for reuse, visit APPI Permissions & Licensing Center at http://www.appi.org/CustomerService/Pages/Permissions.aspx. AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION STEERING COMMITTEE ON PRACTICE GUIDELINES John S. McIntyre, M.D., Chair Sara C. Charles, M.D., Vice-Chair Daniel J. Anzia, M.D. Ian A. Cook, M.D. Molly T. Finnerty, M.D. Bradley R. Johnson, M.D. James E. Nininger, M.D. Paul Summergrad, M.D. Sherwyn M.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Data Sheet
    Inhibitors Product Data Sheet Vanoxerine dihydrochloride • Agonists Cat. No.: HY-13217 CAS No.: 67469-78-7 Molecular Formula: C₂₈H₃₄Cl₂F₂N₂O • Molecular Weight: 523.49 Screening Libraries Target: Dopamine Transporter Pathway: Neuronal Signaling Storage: Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month SOLVENT & SOLUBILITY In Vitro DMSO : 9.4 mg/mL (17.96 mM; Need ultrasonic and warming) Mass Solvent 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg Concentration Preparing 1 mM 1.9103 mL 9.5513 mL 19.1026 mL Stock Solutions 5 mM 0.3821 mL 1.9103 mL 3.8205 mL 10 mM 0.1910 mL 0.9551 mL 1.9103 mL Please refer to the solubility information to select the appropriate solvent. In Vivo 1. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 40% PEG300 >> 5% Tween-80 >> 45% saline Solubility: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (3.97 mM); Clear solution 2. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in saline) Solubility: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (3.97 mM); Clear solution 3. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 90% corn oil Solubility: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (3.97 mM); Clear solution BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY Description Vanoxerine dihydrochloride (GBR-12909 dihydrochloride) is a competitive, potent, and highly selective dopamine reuptake inhibitor (Ki=1 nM). Vanoxerine dihydrochloride (GBR-12909 dihydrochloride) binds to the target site on the dopamine transporter (DAT)[1]. IC₅₀ & Target Ki: 1 nM (dopamine reuptake)[1] In Vitro Vanoxerine dihydrochloride (GBR-12909 dihydrochloride) inhibits the uptake of dopamlne (DA), with an IC50 in the low Page 1 of 2 www.MedChemExpress.com nanomolar range, and is several-fold less potent as inhibitors of the uptake of noradrenaline and 5-HT[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors
    NEURONAL NICOTINIC RECEPTORS Dr Christopher G V Sharples and preparations lend themselves to physiological and pharmacological investigations, and there followed a Professor Susan Wonnacott period of intense study of the properties of nAChR- mediating transmission at these sites. nAChRs at the Department of Biology and Biochemistry, muscle endplate and in sympathetic ganglia could be University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK distinguished by their respective preferences for C10 and C6 polymethylene bistrimethylammonium Susan Wonnacott is Professor of compounds, notably decamethonium and Neuroscience and Christopher Sharples is a hexamethonium,5 providing the first hint of diversity post-doctoral research officer within the among nAChRs. Department of Biology and Biochemistry at Biochemical approaches to elucidate the structure the University of Bath. Their research and function of the nAChR protein in the 1970’s were focuses on understanding the molecular and facilitated by the abundance of nicotinic synapses cellular events underlying the effects of akin to the muscle endplate, in electric organs of the acute and chronic nicotinic receptor electric ray,Torpedo , and eel, Electrophorus . High stimulation. This is with the goal of affinity snakea -toxins, principallyaa -bungarotoxin ( - Bgt), enabled the nAChR protein to be purified, and elucidating the structure, function and subsequently resolved into 4 different subunits regulation of neuronal nicotinic receptors. designateda ,bg , and d .6 An additional subunit, e , was subsequently identified in adult muscle. In the early 1980’s, these subunits were cloned and sequenced, The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) arguably and the era of the molecular analysis of the nAChR has the longest history of experimental study of any commenced.
    [Show full text]