VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Brenna Adams I CA B EA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Brenna Adams I CA B EA VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF LITHUANIAN STUDIES Brenna Adams “I CAN’T BREATHE”: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF THE 2020 BLACK LIVES MATTER PROTESTS IN AMERICAN MEDIA Master of Arts Thesis Joint study programme “Sociolinguistics and Multilingualism”, state code in Lithuania 6281NX001 Study area of Linguistics Supervisor Prof. Dr. Jūratė Ruzaitė ________ _________ (signature) (date) Approved by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Rūta Eidukevičienė ________ _________ (signature) (date) Kaunas, 2021 Table of Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….1 1.1. Aim and Scope………………………………………………………………….3 1.2. Materials and Methods………………………………………………………….6 1.2.1. Corpus Compilation……………………………………………………..7 1.2.2. Data Processing: A Combined Approach to Corpus-Assisted CDA……8 2. Literature Review………………………………………….……………………….13 2.1. Anti-Black Racism in the United States………………………………………..14 2.2. The Black Lives Matter Movement……………………………………………16 2.3. Raciolinguistics and the Language of Protest…………………………………17 3. A Discussion of Racist Discursive Practices in Mainstream Media……………….20 3.1. Discursive Practices Concerning the Protesters and Protests………………….21 3.1.1. Discursive Practices Concerning the Protesters………………………..21 3.1.2. Discursive Practices Concerning the Protests………………………….26 3.2. Discursive Practices Concerning the Police…………………………………...29 3.2.1. Metonymy of Police Vehicles………………………………………….30 3.2.2. Passive Voice Construction…………………………………………….31 3.2.3. Police Brutality as a Collocation……………………………………….34 3.3. Discursive Practices Concerning George Floyd……………………………….39 3.3.1. Topical Focus on Floyd………………………………………………...39 3.3.2. Narrative Construction of Floyd’s Murder as the Spark……………….43 3.3.3. Deployment of Public Memory through Other Black Victims………...45 4. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………48 5. References………………………………………………………………………….51 6. Appendix A. Additional Examples of Excerpts from the Corpus……………………i i List of Tables Table 1. List of sources in corpus and sub-corpora by political bias……………………7 Table 2. Terms used to label protesters ……………………………………...………...22 Table 3. Usage of the phrase “black lives matter”………………………………………27 Table 4. Raw frequencies and percentages of “Black Lives Matter” in context……….28 Table 5. Usage of the phrase “police brutality”………………………………………...35 Table 6. Raw frequencies and percentages of “police brutality” in context……………35 ii List of Abbreviations AP: Associated Press BLM: Black Lives Matter CNN: Cable News Network CDA: Critical discourse analysis DHA: Discourse Historical Approach FN: Fox News G: The Guardian HP: HuffPost NPR: National Public Radio NYP: New York Post NYT: The New York Times POC: People/person of color R: Reuters WSJ: The Wall Street Journal WT: The Washington Times iii 1. Introduction May 25, 2020 began as an average Monday (as average any day could be during the COVID-19 pandemic), but it will be remembered by many as the day that George Floyd was murdered in Minneapolis by police. A video taken by bystanders quickly went viral, and the world watched George Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, struggle to breathe under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer for several minutes until he became unresponsive and died. This video reveals Floyd’s now-famous last words as he begs the officer to get off his neck: “I can’t breathe.” Floyd was officially pronounced dead later that evening at the Hennepin County Medical Center, but paramedics specified that he was unresponsive since they arrived on scene raising questions about the time of his death (Sawyer, 2020). His dying words rang out in the ears of many Americans as a plea for an end to systemic anti-Black racism that plagues police forces across the United States. George Floyd was neither the first nor the last Black American to be murdered by a police officer in 2020. Prior to Floyd’s killing, Breonna Taylor was shot dead by police in her home in March in the middle of the night, as the officers were serving a “no-knock warrant” that allowed them to go without identifying themselves before forcing entry to her home (Browne et al., 2020). Ahmaud Arbery was also shot and killed while out on a jog in February, though this time by a retired police officer and his son, who claimed that Arbery appeared suspicious (Fausset, 2021). Mapping Police Violence, a research collaborative that compiles information about police violence and killings in the US, found that at least 233 Black people were killed by police in 2020 (Sinyangwe et al., 2021). Their data consistently illustrates that Black people (especially Black men) are disproportionately killed by police: in 2020, Black victims made up 28% of police killings despite comprising only 13% of the overall population (Sinyangwe et al., 2021). 2020 was not unusual in terms of the number of Black people killed by police, as the numbers have remained consistent for at least a decade (Sinyangwe et al., 2021). What was remarkable was the response to the murder of George Floyd: massive protests against police brutality, headed by the Black Lives Matter (BLM, see List of Abbreviations) movement, raged across the US for months. The topic of police brutality and its disproportionate effect on People of Color (POC) remains relevant as racial tensions continue to mount in the US. Assessing media portrayal of the protests spurred by George Floyd’s murder can reveal the influence that 1 event-framing has over public opinion as it relates to the political bias of a news source (Hart, 2018; Hoewe and Peacock, 2020; Lane et al., 2020; Leopold and Bell, 2017). Understanding the media’s engagement in or combatting of (anti-Black) racism can illuminate some of the reasons why protests like these, and thus the issues being contested repeatedly by protesters, prevail and to what extent they are validated by the media. Because the media can be considered a “fourth power” (in addition to the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government), its influence on perception of events is essential in understanding the power dynamics between those in power and marginalized groups. The media both shapes and is shaped by our collective ideologies, so evaluating the ideologies constructed and reproduced in the media helps illuminate the ways in which this affects public opinion, while also revealing the ideologies held by those in power (Hoewe and Peacock, 2020; van Dijk, 2006b). Such knowledge grants the ability to question why ideologies that are oppressive to minority groups, continue to be upheld. The two problems addressed in this thesis are: (1) media plays a large role in influencing public understanding of events they portray, and (2) media portrayal of pro- Black movements often engages in anti-Black racism, or fails to engage in anti-racist strategies. These problems perpetuate systemic racism in the US because the media fails to question racist ideologies, instead presenting them as fact and disguising exclusionary tactics employed to maintain racial marginalization (van Dijk, 2006b). Undermining the protest calls for racial equity perpetuates these systems of oppression (Alim and Smitherman, 2020; Flores and Rosa, 2015). The research gap I propose to fill is that the protests of the summer of 2020 are too new to have been fully researched yet. Further, the emerging subfield of raciolinguistics (the intersections of race and language) provides interesting opportunities for re-conceptualizing how racist strategies are used in the media. This gap provides the opportunity to examine entrenched methods of oppression and understand the power dynamics of mainstream media and marginalized peoples. With these foundations in mind, the following research questions are investigated in this thesis: 1. Are conservative news sources (Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, New York Post, The Washington Times) more likely to use anti-Black and/or pro-White racist discursive practices that undermine the validity of the protests or the BLM movement than neutral (NPR, Reuters, Associated Press) or liberal (The New York Times, CNN, 2 The Guardian, HuffPost) news sources? If so, what ideologies are reproduced in conservative media that are not in neutral or liberal media? 2. How does the ascription of agency in violent actions reveal underlying assumptions and presuppositions made about the group portrayed as the agent of the action vs. the object of the action? 3. Which qualities are associated with the BLM movement and Black community in the US, and how are such qualities evaluated by mainstream media against the backdrop of Whiteness a priori? These questions focus on unearthing some of the ways in which anti-Black racism is upheld in mainstream media. They consider the context of the BLM protests in combination with generalized racism in media representations of pro-Black movements. The following sections introduce the aim and scope of this thesis, followed by the materials compiled and analytical methods employed. Section 2 provides a literature review that introduces the theoretical concepts employed in analysis as well. This section is divided into three discussions: (1) a brief discussion of anti-Black racism in the US, (2) an outlining of the BLM movement’s structure and goals, and (3) the raciolinguistic outlook and how it relates to the language of protest. The third section provides in-depth analysis of the discursive practices of the media and is broken down into three sub- categories: (1) the protesters and protests, (2) the police, and (3) George Floyd. Each sub- category focuses on one primary group involved in the protest and the trends exhibited in conjunction with each group are identified and discussed at length. Finally, this thesis concludes in section 4, followed by a listing of references and an appendix containing additional examples from other sources not listed with the main findings. 1.1. Aim and Scope The aim of this thesis is to uncover elements of anti-Black racism in the discursive practices of the media, particularly as correlated to political biases in reporting on the first wave of BLM protests (roughly defined as those protests which occurred May 26 – June 7, 2020) that took place across the United States in response to George Floyd’s murder.
Recommended publications
  • “Mis-Education,” and Language Arts Teaching in the 21St Century Geneva Smitherman Michigan State University
    Language Arts Journal of Michigan Volume 32 Article 3 Issue 2 Race, Language, & Privilege 5-2017 Raciolinguistics, “Mis-Education,” and Language Arts Teaching in the 21st Century Geneva Smitherman Michigan State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/lajm Recommended Citation Smitherman, Geneva (2017) "Raciolinguistics, “Mis-Education,” and Language Arts Teaching in the 21st Century," Language Arts Journal of Michigan: Vol. 32: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.2164 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Language Arts Journal of Michigan by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Critical Pedagogy Raciolinguistics, “Mis-Education,” and Language Arts Teaching in the 21st Century GENEVA SMITHERMAN “English Teacher, Why You Be Doing the Thangs member in what was then the Department of “AfroAmeri- You Don’t Do?” can” Studies ) was that EJ was “nervous” about publishing my strong rebuke of English teachers. Now I didn’t have any & then it was hip–it was hip empirical data to support that vibe from Harvard yard, but it to walk, talk & act a certain did take two years for my article to be published.2 neighborhoodway, In that piece, I merely challenged (okay, I assailed) we wore 24 hr sunglasses & called our those elementary and secondary language arts teachers who woman baby, our woman, dismiss student essays if they don’t reflect the grammar and syntax of the Language of Wider Communication (LWC; we wished her something else, aka, “Dominant English,” “Standardized English,” “Ameri- & she became that wish.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociolinguistic Labor, Linguistic Climate, and Race(Ism) on Campus: Black College Students’ Experiences with Language at Predominantly White Institutions
    Received: 9 December 2019 | Revised: 4 August 2020 | Accepted: 5 August 2020 DOI: 10.1111/josl.12438 ARTICLE Sociolinguistic labor, linguistic climate, and race(ism) on campus: Black college students’ experiences with language at predominantly white institutions Nicole R. Holliday1 | Lauren Squires2 1The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Abstract 2The Ohio State University, Columbus, This project explores the sociolinguistic experiences of OH, USA black American students in predominantly/historically white higher education settings. Through interviews with Correspondence Nicole R. Holliday, The University of 30 black undergraduates at two different types of institu- Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. tions, we show how language is a salient factor in racializa- Email: [email protected] tion and racism on American college campuses. Both sets of students discussed stereotype threat (being at risk of nega- tive stereotyping based on their language), as well as bi- furcated sociolinguistic identities (an outcome of managing their linguistic resources to avoid negative stereotyping). We also find that the nuances of students’ racialized experi- ences with language differ depending on other elements of campus climate: at the small private college, more students described tensions between black students, and stringent ex- pectations for hyper-‘academic’ language. Student accounts reveal the sociolinguistic labor they perform in navigating campus environments rife with linguistic racism, showing that campus climate includes linguistic climate, undergirded by raciolinguistic ideologies. 1 | INTRODUCTION The current study shows, through the personal accounts of black undergraduate students, some of the functions of language in racialization and racism in American higher education settings. Black Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2020;00:1–20.
    [Show full text]
  • Applicant V. DERAY MCKESSON; BLACK LIVES MATTER; BLACK LIVES MATTER NETWORK, INCORPORATED Defendants - Respondents
    STATE OF LOUISIANA 2021-CQ-00929 LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT OFFICER JOHN DOE, Police Officer Plaintiff - Applicant v. DERAY MCKESSON; BLACK LIVES MATTER; BLACK LIVES MATTER NETWORK, INCORPORATED Defendants - Respondents OFFICER JOHN DOE Plaintiff - Applicant Versus DeRAY McKESSON; BLACK LIVES MATTER; BLACK LIVES MATTER NETWORK, INCORPORATED Defendants - Respondents On Certified Question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 17-30864 Circuit Judges Jolly, Elrod, and Willett Appeal From the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:16-CV-742 Honorable Judge Brian A. Jackson, Presiding OFFICER JOHN DOE ORIGINAL BRIEF ON APPLICATION FOR REVIEW BY CERTIFIED QUESTION Respectfully submitted: ATTORNEY FOR THE APPLICANT OFFICER JOHN DOE Donna U. Grodner (20840) GRODNER LAW FIRM 2223 Quail Run, B-1 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 (225) 769-1919 FAX 769-1997 [email protected] CIVIL PROCEEDING TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.. ii CERTIFIED QUESTIONS. 1 1. Whether Louisiana law recognizes a duty, under the facts alleged I the complaint, or otherwise, not to negligently precipitate the crime of a third party? 2. Assuming McKesson could otherwise be held liable for a breach of duty owed to Officer Doe, whether Louisiana’s Professional Rescuer’s Doctrine bars recovery under the facts alleged in the complaint? . 1 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION. 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE. 1 A. NATURE OF THE CASE. 1 B. PROCEDURAL HISTORY. 12 1. ACTION OF THE TRIAL COURT. 12 2. ACTION OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 12 3. ACTION OF THE SUPREME COURT. 13 4. ACTION OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. 13 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Do Negative Stereotypes Come From? the Case of Indian English in the USA Ethan Kutlu & Caroline Wiltshire*
    2020. Proc Ling Soc Amer 5(1). 74–82. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4669. Where do negative stereotypes come from? The case of Indian English in the USA Ethan Kutlu & Caroline Wiltshire* Abstract. Language attitudes inform social stereotyping, which in turn affects linguistic judgments (Fiske, Cuddy & Glick 2007). Nonstandard varieties are particularly subject to negative stereotypes, being evaluated as “less friendly” and “hard to understand” (Giles & Watson 2013). In this study, we investigate attitudes towards Indian English, a variety of English spoken by one of the largest immigrant populations in the USA (approximately 2.4 million), to understand the roots of linguistic stereotyping towards this variety of English. We compared attitudes of American English speakers towards Indian English and British English. Our results show that while American English speakers do not explicitly indicate any communication problem with Indian English, they disfavor Indian English compared to British English. This disfavoring of Indian English aligns with Raciolinguistic theories, suggesting that post-colonialism, especially Whiteness, is a factor in language prestige and how different varieties are perceived. Keywords. raciolinguistics; World Englishes; Indian English; British English; lan- guage prestige; attitudes 1. Introduction. Indian English, an outer circle English variety, is spoken by over 125 million people (Government of India, 2011). Speakers of Indian English are exposed to this variety ei- ther from birth as simultaneous bilinguals or from early childhood as sequential bilinguals. Despite its widespread use, Indian English is perceived negatively by many monolingual speak- ers of English (Lindemann 2005). This necessitates more research to identify the forces creating negative stereotyping towards Indian English.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEN FREELON CHARLTON D. MCILWAIN MEREDITH D. CLARK About the Authors: Deen Freelon Is an Assistant Professor of Communication at American University
    BEYOND THE HASHTAGS DEEN FREELON CHARLTON D. MCILWAIN MEREDITH D. CLARK About the authors: Deen Freelon is an assistant professor of communication at American University. Charlton D. McIlwain is an associate professor of media, culture and communi- cation and Associate Dean for Faculty Development and Diversity at New York University. Meredith D. Clark is an assistant professor of digital and print news at the University of North Texas. Please send any questions or comments about this report to Deen Freelon at [email protected]. About the Center For Media & Social Impact: The Center for Media & Social Impact at American University’s School of Communication, based in Washington, D.C., is an innovation lab and research center that creates, studies, and showcases media for social impact. Fo- cusing on independent, documentary, entertainment and public media, the Center bridges boundaries between scholars, producers and communication practitioners across media production, media impact, public policy, and audience engagement. The Center produces resources for the field and academic research; convenes conferences and events; and works collaboratively to understand and design media that matters. www.cmsimpact.org Internal photos: Philip Montgomery Graphic design and layout: openbox9 The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from the Spencer Foundation, without which this project would not have been possible. We also thank Ryan Blocher, Frank Franco, Cate Jackson, and Sedale McCall for transcribing participant interviews; David Proper and Kate Sheppard for copyediting; and Mitra Arthur, Caty Borum Chattoo, Brigid Maher, and Vincent Terlizzi for assisting with the report’s web presence and PR. The views expressed in this report are the authors’ alone and are not necessarily shared by the Spencer Foundation or the Center for Media and Social Impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Arbitration
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 74 Issue 4 May 2021 Article 4 5-2021 Police Arbitration Stephen Rushin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Rushin, Police Arbitration, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review 1023 (2021) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol74/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Police Arbitration Stephen Rushin* Before punishing an officer for professional misconduct, police departments often provide the officer with an opportunity to file an appeal. In many police departments, this appeals process culminates in a hearing before an arbitrator. While numerous media reports have suggested that arbitrators regularly overturn or reduce discipline, little legal research has comprehensively examined the outcomes of police disciplinary appeals across the United States. In order to better understand the use of arbitration in police disciplinary appeals and build on prior research, this Article draws on a dataset of 624 arbitration awards issued between 2006 and 2020 from a diverse range of law enforcement agencies. It finds that arbitrators on appeal reduced or overturned police officer discipline in 52% of these cases. In 46% of cases involving termination, arbitrators ordered police departments to rehire previously terminated officers. On average, arbitrators reduced the length of officer suspensions by approximately 49%. Arbitrators gave several common justifications for reductions in officer discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Matter of Black Lives a New Kind of Movement Found Its Moment
    The Matter of Black Lives A new kind of movement found its moment. What will its future be? By Jelani Cobb, THE NEW YORKER, March 14, 2016 On February 18th, as part of the official recognition of Black History Month, President Obama met with a group of African-American leaders at the White House to discuss civil-rights issues. The guests—who included Representative John Lewis, of Georgia; Sherrilyn Ifill, the director- counsel of the N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense and Educational Fund; and Wade Henderson, who heads the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights—were intent on pressing the President to act decisively on criminal-justice issues during his last year in office. Their urgency, though, was tempered by a degree of sentimentality, verging on nostalgia. As Ifill later told me, “We were very much aware that this was the last Black History Month of this Presidency.” But the meeting was also billed as the “first of its kind,” in that it would bring together different generations of activists. To that end, the White House had invited DeRay Mckesson, Brittany Packnett, and Aislinn Pulley, all of whom are prominent figures in Black Lives Matter, which had come into existence—amid the flash points of the George Zimmerman trial; Michael Brown’s death, in Ferguson, Missouri; and the massacre at the Emanuel A.M.E. Church, in Charleston, South Carolina—during Obama’s second term. Black Lives Matter has been described as “not your grandfather’s civil-rights movement,” to distinguish its tactics and its philosophy from those of nineteen-sixties-style activism.
    [Show full text]
  • Deray Mckesson, Johnetta Elzie and Co. Launch Campaign Zero to End Police Brutality
    DeRay Mckesson, Johnetta Elzie and Co. Launch Campaign Zero To End Police Brutality The "data-informed" platform was launched at the end of last week by prominent black activists, presenting a 10-point platform for eliminating police brutality. Sameer Rao Aug 24, 2015 12:14PM EDT Colorlines Screenshot of Campaign Zero's platform graphic, taken August 24, 2015. Colorlines Screenshot Share This! DeRay Mckesson and Johnetta Elzie teamed up with activist/Ferguson Commission appointee Brittany Packnett and data scientist Samuel Sinyangwe to launch Campaign Zero at the end of last week, offering a formalized and accessible new tool in the fight against police brutality. Campaign Zero acts as a data-driven platform for the broader struggle against police violence and offers policy points for how to ultimately reform the problematic structures that have resulted in law enforcement violence for so long. The ten points, as outlined in the graphic attached to Mckesson's Twitter post (and which can be seen here) are as follows: 1) End Broken Windows Policing 2) Community Oversight 3) Limit Use of Force 4) Independently Investigate & Prosecute 5) Community Representation 6) Body Cams/Film the Police 7) Training 8) End For-Profit Policing 9) Demilitarization 10) Fair Police Union Contracts Campaign Zero also offers a tracking tool for the 2016 presidential election, outlining where various candidates from both parties stand on the ten policy points, among other graphic tools outlining the statistical impact and story of contemporary police violence. Visit Campaign Zero's website to see more. .
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Heritage Language Learners' Critical Language
    languages Article Understanding Heritage Language Learners’ Critical Language Awareness (CLA) in Mixed Language Programs Laura Gasca Jiménez * and Sergio Adrada-Rafael Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Fairfield University, Fairfield, CT 06824, USA; sadradarafael@fairfield.edu * Correspondence: lgascajimenez1@fairfield.edu Abstract: Despite the prevalence of mixed language programs across the United States, their impact on the unique socio-affective needs of heritage language (HL) students has not been researched sufficiently. Therefore, the present study examines HL learners’ critical language awareness (CLA) in a mixed Spanish undergraduate program at a small private university in the eastern United States. Sixteen HL learners enrolled in different Spanish upper-level courses participated in the study. Respondents completed an existing questionnaire to measure CLA, which includes 19 Likert-type items addressing different areas, such as language variation, language ideologies, bilingualism, and language maintenance. Overall, the results show that learners in the mixed language program under study have “somewhat high” and “high” levels of CLA. The increased levels of CLA in learners who had completed three courses or more in the program, coupled with their strong motivation, suggests that this program contributes positively toward HL students’ CLA. However, respondents’ answers also reveal standard language ideologies, as well as the personal avoidance of code-switching. Based on these findings, two areas that could benefit from a wider representation in the curriculum of mixed language programs are discussed: language ideologies and plurilingual language practices. Keywords: critical language awareness; language attitudes; mixed language program; standard Citation: Gasca Jiménez, Laura, language ideology; code-switching; language variation; plurilingualism and Sergio Adrada-Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Black Lives Matter
    Reconfiguring Community: An Analysis of Black Lives Matter Amy Webb M.A. in English, Culture, and the Media University of Malta A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Arts of the University of Malta in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in English, Culture, and the Media June 2017 UNIVERSITY OF MALTA FACULTY/INSTITUTE/CENTRE/SCHOOL__________________________ DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY FOR MASTER’S STUDENTS Student’s I.D. /Code ___________________563093(M) __________ Student’s Name & Surname _________________________________________________Amy Webb Course _________________________________________________________________M.A. in English,Culture and the Media Title of Dissertation _______________________________________________________________________Reconfiguring Community: An Analysis of Black Lives Matter ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ I hereby declare that I am the legitimate author of this Dissertation and that it is my original work. No portion of this work has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or institution of higher education. I hold the University of Malta harmless against any third party claims with regard to copyright violation, breach of confidentiality, defamation and any other third party right infringement. As a Master’s student, as per Regulation 58 of the General Regulations for University Postgraduate
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of the Sociology of Language
    IJSL 2020; 265: 1–7 Editorial Jennifer B. Delfino* and Maureen Kosse Racialization and the national body: (Re)defining selves and others in changing contexts of liberal democratic governance https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2100 Abstract: This introduction argues that understanding the co-construction of race, language, and nation is essential to understanding liberal democratic governance in today’s world. Using the theories and methods of raciolinguistics, we argue that voicing and resemiotization are important discursive processes that people use to reconstitute selves and Others in relation to liberal democratic ideas about na- tional belonging. Specifically, we examine how racialized redefinitions of “the body” are central to how right and left-leaning groups alike (re)define nationhood, albeit for different ends. We foreground an intersectional, international approach to understanding the role of language in constructing race and vice versa as well as the role of social media in how differently positioned groups seek empowerment. Keywords: racialization, language, nationalism, voicing, semiotics, embodiment 1 Introduction This special issue examines how race is constituted in the voicing practices of social actors who seek to control or redefine ideas about difference and belonging. Using the theories and methods of “raciolinguistics” (Alim 2016), we argue that voicing, defined as the discursive recruitment of recognizable social types (Bakhtin 1981; Reyes 2016), is central to how people reconstitute selves and others in rela- tion to liberal democratic ideas about national belonging. We draw attention to places that are experiencing an increasing polarization between socially right and *Corresponding author: Jennifer B. Delfino, Borough of Manhattan Community College (CUNY), New York, USA, E-mail: jdelfi[email protected] Maureen Kosse: University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA, E-mail: [email protected] 2 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Memo
    Research Memo: Police Unions and the Obstacles They Pose Community Resource Hub for Safety and Accountability Kelcey Duggan – Senior Research Associate [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….1 Key Recommendations……………………………………………………………………3 Context…………………………………………………………………………………….5 Obstacles to Accountability………………………………...……………………………11 Obstacles to Police Reform………………………………………………………………15 Challenging & Limiting Police Union Power……………………………………………19 Austin Justice Coalition & Police Union Power…………………………………………20 Recommendations………………………………………………………………………..24 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….27 References………………………………………………………………………………..28 Executive Summary This memo provides brief background information on the history of police unions in the United States and their role in relation to the policing profession. The memo also highlights the obstacles that police unions and their contracts create for accountability, reform efforts, and campaigns that challenge police union power in order to overcome those obstacles. Finally, this memo provides specific recommendations for research, organizing, and policy developments when challenging police union power. The goal of this memo is to illuminate the power of police unions and the protections afforded by their contracts; in 14 states these protections are supported—in addition to or in the absence of union contracts—by legislation called the Law Enforcement Officers Bills of Rights (LEOBR) or the Police Officers Bills of Rights (POBR). Often there is confusion, upset, frustration, and anger about the inability of community members and elected officials to hold police officers accountable for misconduct and the inability to create lasting reform within police departments— 1 difficulties often due to the police unions’ power derived from their contracts and/or from the LEOBR/POBR. This memo gathers examples of how police union power plays out across the United States and highlights model practices for effectively challenging police union power.
    [Show full text]