DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Erie Lake Sturgeon Working Group (LELSWG) Notes – November 14Th, 2018 Tifft Nature Preserve 1200 Fuhrmann Blvd, Buffalo, NY 14203

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Erie Lake Sturgeon Working Group (LELSWG) Notes – November 14Th, 2018 Tifft Nature Preserve 1200 Fuhrmann Blvd, Buffalo, NY 14203 Lake Erie Lake Sturgeon Working Group (LELSWG) Notes – November 14th, 2018 Tifft Nature Preserve 1200 Fuhrmann Blvd, Buffalo, NY 14203 Participants at Tifft: James Boase, Andrew Briggs, Justin Chiotti, Chris Driscoll, Dimitry Gorsky, Nicholas Markley, John Sweka, and Chris Vandergoot Participants Video/Conference: Rich Drouin, Jason Fischer, Jessica Collier Introductions and Opening Remarks: Introductions USFWS R3 (SCDRS and Lake Erie): Justin Chiotti presented information regarding ongoing assessments conducted by the Alpena FWCO. Mark‐recapture assessments continue to be conducted in the Detroit River and southern Lake Huron in cooperation with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Michigan DNR, and Purdy Fisheries. In addition to refine population estimates and demographic information, the mark‐recapture estimates serve as a way to monitor the southern Lake Huron population where gametes are being collected for stocking into Lakes Erie and Huron. The Fort Wayne Reef, a 4 acre spawning reef constructed in the Detroit River, was finished in the spring of 2018. Juvenile lake sturgeon assessments continue to take place near the mouth of the Detroit River and in Maumee Bay. Setlines are used to target juvenile lake sturgeon (1/0 hook size) rather than gill nets. Based on catch information it looks like age‐2 and older sturgeon should be vulnerable to this gear. Acoustic transmitters were implanted into 13 juvenile sturgeon near the mouth of the Detroit River to monitor movement and survival of these fish. Alpena FWCO staff also participated in tracking fall fingerling lake sturgeon that received acoustic transmitters to monitor movement and survival of fish stocked into the Maumee River. In October of 2018, 2,949 fall fingerling lake sturgeon were released into the Maumee River. USGS (Lake Erie): Chris Vandergoot gave an update on the fall fingerling acoustic telemetry project in the Maumee River. Fall fingerlings from the Toledo Zoo streamside rearing facility and Genoa NFH received acoustic transmitters (Vemco: V7) to compare survival and movement between the two rearing strategies. Staff from the USGS and USFWS conducted weekly mobile tracking surveys in the Maumee River. Mobile surveys will begin commence in early spring, the battery life for the tags is expected to be near 1 year. OMNRF Lake Erie: Rich Drouin gave an update on behalf of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Rich mentioned that there was an election and there have been some restrictions placed on travel. He mentioned that there was interest from hatchery staff to start a sturgeon project and as a result they have hired a lake sturgeon rearing expert. As of right now, they are building knowledge have started looking at some of the tributaries for a reintroduction particularly the Grand River and Thames River. In the Grand River, lake sturgeon have been detected on receivers near the river mouth. Four different individuals detected, all of those tagged fish have been from the Buffalo Harbor area. One fish detected every year for the last four years. OMNR staff may be assisting with broodstock collections in Port Huron/Sarnia during the spring of 2019, to gain a better understanding of the project. USGS (SCDRS and Lake Erie): Jason Fischer is gave an update lake sturgeon habitat restoration in the St. Clair – Detroit River System. The Fort Wayne Reef was completed in of 2018 and is 4 acres in size. That was the 7th project in the SCDRS for sturgeon and other lithophilic spawning fish. Annually, the USGS evaluates the efficacy of restoration sites via egg collections, larval fish, and physical habitat assessments. Lake sturgeon eggs have primarily collected at reef sites, even though egg mats have been placed at many other locations throughout the system. In 2018, lake sturgeon spawning was limited to the Hart’s Light Reef and Maslinka’s Reef in the St. Clair River. In the Detroit River lake sturgeon eggs were only collected at the Fighting Island Reef. Physical assessments have been conducted over time to quantify changes in the reefs. Reef area has decreased over time and sediment composition is changing. In‐filling is occurring across reefs, however the rate and type of sediment composition is variable. Portions of all reefs remain exposed. Jason mentioned that some hypotheses of sediment sources could be due to high water levels (20 year high), or possibly other episodic events, and ice jams that erode shorelines. He mentioned that the SCDRS is a sediment starved system, able to transport much more sediment than what is available to them. The USGS is working with a group of Great Lakes biologists and a graduate student at Purdue University to evaluate methods of methods of water propulsion and flushing to displace fine sediments and dressinid mussels. The goal of this research is to develop cost effective maintenance methods to be applied to natural and artificial reefs throughout the Great Lakes, including those constructed in the SCDRS. NYSDEC (Lake Erie and Upper Niagara R.): Chris Driscoll provided information about NYSDEC work. Gill netting began in 2012 and has continued each year with the assistance from the USFWS Northeast Fishery Center and Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office. Around 240 lake sturgeon have been captured, which equates to about 30 per year. The best year was around 50 lake sturgeon. Fish are captured with gill nets and usually two nets are set with 8‐14” mesh. Many of the fish that have been aged as a result of this work are young. Common tagging procedures are employed. In the past fish received an acoustic tag to evaluate movement and stationary receivers can be found throughout Buffalo Harbor and in the upper Niagara River. Chris mentioned that a lake sturgeon recovery plan has been developed for New York waters. A self‐ sustaining population is defined as 750 fish per management unit with evidence of natural recruitment in least 3 years of a 5‐year period within the last 20 calendar years in a Management Unit. USFWS R5 (Lake Erie and Upper Niagara R.): John Sweka gave an update regarding Region 5’s activities in Lake Erie and Upper Niagara River. Lake sturgeon sampling efforts began in 2014 along with NYSDEC. Currently, there are 64 lake sturgeon at large with acoustic tags that were tagged in Buffalo Harbor. There is a total of 63 receivers in Buffalo Harbor and 7 receivers in the Upper Niagara River. VPS estimates have been generated for the fish that have been tagged. Sturgeon eggs were collected at Bird Island Reef in the spring of 2017 (Neuenhoff et al. 2017; citation below). Year after year, the fish are showing the same behavioral patterns. One of the next steps is to investigate movement patterns and habitat use using Brownie analysis. Large scale movements will also be investigated. Many of the fish that have been collected in Buffalo Harbor were from 1994 – 2004 year classes. Very few fish have been captured outside of these years. Some possible hypothesis of the lack of other age classes include enforcement of the Clean Water Act or full closure of the sturgeon fishery, both occurring in the 1970’s. Future plans include analysis and write up of telemetry data and revise/publish population estimate manuscript. In the future the Northeast Fishery Center will be spending less field effort in this area. Field data collections will concentrate on continuing population estimation and refining catchability parameters. They will also be working on acoustically tagging more females. Neuenhoff , R.D, Withers J.L., Davis L.A., Markley N.D., Dowell S., Bartron M.L., Gorsky D., Sweka, J.A. 2018. Discovery of an undocumented Lake Sturgeon spawning site in the headwaters of the Niagara River. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 9(1):xx–xx; e1944‐687X. doi: 10.3996/102017‐JFWM‐ 087. MDNR (St Clair Det. R System (SCDRS) and Lake Erie): Andrew Briggs provided an update for the Michigan DNR. The Michigan DNR began tagging lake sturgeon in the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair in 1996. Since that time 3,338 lake sturgeon have been tagged including 822 recaptures (522 unique recaptures). In 2018, 124 lake sturgeon were captured on 88 setlines sets. Thirty of these fish were recaptures for a 25% recapture rate. Twenty‐nine lake sturgeon were captured in bottom trawls in Lake St. Clair with two recaptures for a 7% recapture rate. Andrew presented information on tag retention for monel and floy loop tags. Based on this work monel tags had 88% tag retention while floy loop tags only had 63%. PIT tag retention was 99%. Floy loop tag loss as higher for smaller fish. In recent years, juvenile lake sturgeon (< 100 cm) cpue has been increasing based on setline catch data. Andrew mentioned that age‐5 lake sturgeon are fully recruited to the smaller sized (2/0) hooks on the setline and the number of age‐5 lake sturgeon also seems to be increasing based on setline catches. The 2017 age‐5 cpue was the highest on record. Andrew also presented information on the St. Clair River recreational fishery. On average 6.2 fish per year are harvested and a total of 248 fish have been recaptured by anglers in the system. There is anecdotal evidence of increased fishing pressure. Since the recreational fishery began, 60 harvestable sized fish have been captured (42 – 50” in length), with nine of these being harvested (15%). Staff from the Lake St. Clair Fish Research Station also just published an article titled “Mark‐Recapture Validation of Pectoral Fin Ray Estimation for Lake Sturgeon” in the North American Journal of Fisheries Management (https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10228) Setting Goals for Restoration Using a Strategic Conservation Strategy Framework: Dimitry Gorsky and John Sweka presented information about the Strategic Habitat Conservation Model approach and how that could be used to drive lake sturgeon restoration efforts in the Lake Erie basin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 1 03089500 Mill Creek Near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale C
    Table 2-1. Basin characteristics determined for selected streamgages in Ohio and adjacent States. [Characteristics listed in this table are described in detail in the text portion of appendix 2; column headings used in this table are shown in parentheses adjacent to the bolded long variable names] Station number Station name DASS Latc Longc SL10-85 LFPath SVI Agric Imperv OpenWater W 03089500 Mill Creek near Berlin Center, Ohio 19.13 40.9638 80.9476 10.86 9.13 0.6880 58.17 0.77 0.41 2.10 03092000 Kale Creek near Pricetown, Ohio 21.68 41.0908 81.0409 14.09 12.88 0.8076 40.46 1.08 0.48 2.31 03092090 West Branch Mahoning River near Ravenna, Ohio 21.81 41.2084 81.1983 20.23 11.19 0.5068 38.65 2.35 1.01 2.51 03102950 Pymatuning Creek at Kinsman, Ohio 96.62 41.4985 80.6401 5.46 21.10 0.6267 52.26 0.82 1.18 5.60 03109500 Little Beaver Creek near East Liverpool, Ohio 495.57 40.8103 80.6732 7.89 55.27 0.4812 38.05 1.98 0.79 1.41 03110000 Yellow Creek near Hammondsville, Ohio 147.22 40.5091 80.8855 9.37 33.62 0.5439 19.84 0.34 0.33 0.36 03111500 Short Creek near Dillonvale, Ohio 122.95 40.2454 80.8859 15.25 27.26 0.3795 30.19 1.08 0.93 1.16 03111548 Wheeling Creek below Blaine, Ohio 97.60 40.1274 80.9477 13.43 27.46 0.3280 40.92 0.97 0.56 0.64 03114000 Captina Creek at Armstrongs Mills, Ohio 133.69 39.9307 81.0696 13.56 26.99 0.6797 32.76 0.54 0.64 0.66 03115400 Little Muskingum River at Bloomfield, Ohio 209.94 39.6699 81.1370 5.50 44.84 0.7516 10.00 0.25 0.12 0.12 03115500 Little Muskingum River at Fay, Ohio 258.25 39.6406 81.1531 4.32 60.10 0.7834
    [Show full text]
  • Maumee River Area of Concern 2004 Stream & Septic Monitoring Study FINAL REPORT
    Maumee River Area of Concern 2004 Stream & Septic Monitoring Study FINAL REPORT October 2004 Prepared For: Prepared By: TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT 1.2 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OF STUDY 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF WATERSHED 1.4 REGULATIONS AND IMPACTS 1.5 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 2.0 REVIEW OF EXISTING WATER QUALITY INFORMATION 3.0 STREAM AND SEPTIC MONITORING PLAN SUMMARY 3.1 SAMPLING RATIONALE 3.2 TASK DESCRIPTIONS 4.0 STREAM AND SEPTIC MONITORING RESULTS 4.1 STREAM MONITORING 4.2 SEPTIC MONITORING 4.3 PUBLIC EDUCATION 4.4 GEOGRAPHIC SUMMARY OF DATA 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS 5.1 STREAM MONITORING 5.2 SEPTIC MONITORING 5.3 PUBLIC EDUCATION 5.4 FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS 6.0 REFERENCES LIST OF TABLES 4.1 Stream Sampling Summary Table (Appendix E) 4.2 Stream Sampling Site Priorities Based on Results of Surface Water and Sediment Fecal Coliform Concentrations (in text) 4.3 Wood County Septic System Testing 2004 (Appendix E) 4.4 Lucas County Septic System Testing 2004 (Appendix E) Maumee River AOC RAP i 10/27/2004 2004 Stream & Septic Monitoring Study Final Report APPENDICES APPENDIX A STREAM SAMPLING DATA APPENDIX B SEPTIC SYSTEM TEST DATA APPENDIX C PUBLIC EDUCATION MATERIALS APPENDIX D RELATED NEWS ARTICLES & PROJECTS APPENDIX E MAPS & BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPENDIX F GIS DATA APPENDIX G WORK PLAN Maumee River AOC RAP ii 10/27/2004 2004 Stream & Septic Monitoring Study Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This 2004 Stream & Septic Monitoring Study Final Report (S&SS Report) serves as the final submittal as outlined in Contract DACW49-04-R-0010: Maumee River Area of Concern (AOC) Remedial Action Plan (RAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN I. ON AN INCREASE IN THE NAIAD FAUNA OF SAGINAW BAY, MICHIGAN 11. THE NAIAD SPECIES OF THE GREAT LAI(ES BY CALVINGOODRICH AND HENRYVANDER SCHALIE 1. NINE species of Naiades were found by Dr. H. B. Baker to inhabit Saginaw Bay in the vicinity of Sand Point, Huron County, Michigan, when he made his study of the molluscan fauna of the region in 1908. The survey was a very thorough one and several weelis mere devoted to the work. Twenty-three years later, a much more perfunctory survey was made by the writers of this paper in the same locality, their visits to Sand Point being more in the nature of holidays than for collecting purposes. Yet their findings amounted to thirteen species in contrast to Baker's nine. Moreover, they are enabled to report that five of the nine species of the Baker list proved to be more abundant in 1931 than they were in 1908. Such an increase in ~nollnsca appears to be unusual in American species. The writers are unable to find in the litera- ture of the subject any inention of anything quite like it. In- stances have occurred where an introduced species, Bytlzinia tentaculata (Linnaeus), for example, has developed such a fecundity as to be a pest (F. C. Balier, 1902 ; Sterlqi, 1910). A circnmboreal land snail, Vallonia ~~z~l~lzella(Miiller) , is kno~\~nto have developed exceedingly large colonies that prob- ably were larger than those wliich existed before the trans- plantation of European agriculture on this continent (G.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohiocontrolled Hunting
    CONTROLLED HUNTING OHIO OPPORTUNITIES 2020-2021 Application period JULY 1, 2020 to JULY 31, 2020 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE wildohio.gov OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE The Division of Wildlife’s mission is to conserve and improve fish and wildlife resources and their habitats for sustainable use and appreciation by all. VISIT US ON THE WEB WILDOHIO.GOV FOR GENERAL INFORMATION 1-800-WILDLIFE (1-800-945-3543) TO REPORT WILDLIFE VIOLATIONS 1-800-POACHER (1-800-762-2437) DIVISION OF WILDLIFE **AVAILABLE 24 HOURS** DISTRICT OFFICES OHIO GAME CHECK OHIOGAMECHECK.COM WILDLIFE DISTRICT ONE 1500 Dublin Road 1-877-TAG-IT-OH Columbus, OH 43215 (1-877-824-4864) (614) 644‑3925 WILDLIFE DISTRICT TWO HIP CERTIFICATION 952 Lima Avenue 1-877-HIP-OHIO Findlay, OH 45840 (1-877-447-6446) (419) 424‑5000 WILDLIFE DISTRICT THREE FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA 912 Portage Lakes Drive Akron, OH 44319 Like us on Facebook (330) 644‑2293 facebook.com/ohiodivisionofwildlife Follow us on Twitter WILDLIFE DISTRICT FOUR twitter.com/OhioDivWildlife 360 E. State Street Athens, OH 45701 (740) 589‑9930 WILDLIFE DISTRICT FIVE 1076 Old Springfield Pike Xenia, OH 45385 (937) 372‑9261 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY The Ohio Division of Wildlife offers equal opportunity regardless GOVERNOR, STATE OF OHIO of race, color, national origin, age, disability or sex (in education programs). If you believe you have been discriminated against in MIKE DeWINE any program, activity or facility, you should contact: The U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Diversity & Civil Rights Programs-External Programs, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT 4040 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge 2020 Hunt Brochure (874
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fix Unit Hunting Regulations Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge 5437 W. Jefferson Ave Big Game: Wild turkey and archery Trenton, MI 48183 only white-tailed deer. Closed to Detroit River Phone: 734/365 0219 fi rearm deer hunting. People with hearing impairments may reach Detroit Upland/Small Game: Ring-necked River International Wildlife Refuge through the International pheasant; gray, fox, and red squirrel; Federal Relay System at 1-800/877 8339 cottontail rabbit; raccoon; gray and Wildlife Refuge red fox; and coyote. www.fws.gov/refuge/detroit_river e v Migratory Birds: Goose, duck, A n o s Hunting Map r e f f e merganser, coot, gallinule, woodcock, J st U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service e sora, rail, and Wilson’s snipe. W 1 800/344 WILD & Regulations Hunter Access www.fws.gov From I-75, take Exit 21 (Swan Creek Rd.) east to North Dixie Hwy. Turn right (south) and take North Dixie Hwy. to Post Rd. Turn left (east) and Hunters’ Note: Boundaries posted in the field supersede all boundaries shown on this map. d take Post Rd. about 1 mile to Leroux a o Rd. Turn right (southwest) and take R e k i Leroux Rd. to Langton Rd. Turn left p n r u (southeast) and take Langton Rd. to T . S Toll Rd./Fisher St. Turn left (northeast) . and follow to Fix Unit. Hunter parking U area is on left. y a w h Plum Creek Bay Unit Hunting Regulations g i H e i x Big Game: CLOSED. i D h t Upland/Small Game: CLOSED.
    [Show full text]
  • Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002 March 25, 2002 prepared by Division of Surface Water Division of Surface Water, 122 South Front St., PO Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 Introduction Federal Water Quality Standard (WQS) program regulations require that States adopt and use an antidegradation policy. The policy has two distinct purposes. First, an antidegradation policy must provide a systematic and reasoned decision making process to evaluate the need to lower water quality. Regulated activities should not lower water quality unless the need to do so is demonstrated based on technical, social and economic criteria. The second purpose of an antidegradation policy is to ensure that the State’s highest quality streams, rivers and lakes are preserved. This document deals with the latter aspect of the antidegradation policy. Section 6111.12(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code specifically requires that the Ohio EPA establish provisions “ensuring that waters of exceptional recreational and ecological value are maintained as high quality resources for future generations.” Table 1 explains the proposed classification system to accomplish this directive. The shaded categories denote the special higher resource quality categories. The proposed rule contains 157 stream segments classified as either State Resource Waters (SRW) or Superior High Quality Waters (SHQW). The approximate mileage in each classification is shown in Table 1. The total mileage in both classifications represents less than four percent of Ohio’s streams. Refer to “Methods and Documentation Used to Propose State Resource Water and Superior High Quality Water Classifications for Ohio’s Water Quality Standards” (Ohio EPA, 2002) for further information about the process used to develop the list of streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Devoted to the Study and Appreciation of Ohio's Birdlife • Vol. 43, No. 3, Spring 2020
    Devoted to the Study and Appreciation of Ohio’s Birdlife • Vol. 43, No. 3, Spring 2020 An exciting find for Gautam Apte, this fledgling Eastern Screech-Owl posed at Shaker Lakes,Cuyahoga , on 08 May. On the cover: The first state record Hooded Oriole was the highlight of spring migration for Bruce Miller, who masterfully photographed it at a private residence in Columbus on 02 April. Vol. 43 No. 3 Devoted to the Study and Appreciation of Ohio’s Birdlife EDITOR OHIO BIRD RECORDS Craig Caldwell COMMITTEE 1270 W. Melrose Dr. Westlake, OH 44145 Jay G. Lehman 440-356-0494 Secretary [email protected] 7064 Shawnee Run Rd. Cincinnati, OH 45243 [email protected] PHOTO EDITOR Jamie Cunningham PAST PUBLISHERS [email protected] John Herman (1978–1980) Edwin C. Pierce (1980–2008) LAYOUT Roger Lau PAST EDITORS [email protected] John Herman (1978–1980) Edwin C. Pierce (1980–1991) Thomas Kemp (1987–1991) CONSULTANTS Robert Harlan (1991–1996) Ron Canterbury Victor W. Fazio III (1996–1997) Tim Colborn Bill Whan (1997–2008) Bob Dudley Andy Jones (2008–2010) Stefan Gleissberg Jill M. Russell (2010–2012) Rob Harlan Andy Jones Kent Miller Brian Wulker And the 27 eBird county reviewers ISSN 1534-1666 The Ohio Cardinal, Spring 2020 COMMENTS ON THE SEASON By Craig Caldwell al, with some places getting as little as 75% of their usual rainfall, most of the southern half got This issue reaches you with the hope that you between 125 and 200% of the norm with Cin- and your loved ones are healthy and that the cinnati’s 15 inches being triple the usual amount.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuyahoga River RAP State of the River Report
    CUYAHOGA RIVER REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN STATE OF THE RIVER REPORT & PROCEEDINGSPROCEEDINGS OFOF THETHE OCTOCTOBEROBER 25,25, 20012001 SYMPOSIUMSYMPOSIUM JANUARY 2002 Sponsored by: The Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Prepared by Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan 1299 Superior Ave, Cleveland Ohio 44114 (216) 241-2414 FAX (216) 621-3024 This report was funded by grants from the George Gund Foundation, the Cleveland Foundation, the GAR Foundation, the Ohio EPEPAA andand thethe USUS ForestForest ServiceService DivisionDivision ofof StateState andand PrivatePrivate ForestryForestry NortheasternNortheastern Area,Area, andand technicaltechnical supportsupport from the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency. Additional reproduction of this report was funded with support from the US Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office CUYAHOGA RIVER REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN STATE OF THE RIVER REPORT AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE OCTOBER 25, 2001 SYMPOSIUM JANUARY 2002 Prepared by Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan 1299 Superior Ave, Cleveland Ohio 44114 (216) 241-2414 FAX (216) 621-3024 This report was funded by grants from the George Gund Foundation, the Cleveland Foundation, the GAR Foundation, the Ohio EPA and the US Forest Service Division of State and Private Forestry Northeastern Area, and technical support from the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Acknowledgements Preparation of this document
    [Show full text]
  • Active Ohio Wetland Mitigation Banks 1/27/09
    Active Ohio Mitigation Banks For the most up to date information visit: https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits_apex/f?p=107:2 LONG ARMY BANK NAME, SERVICE AREA TERM LOCATION CORPS SPONSOR MANAGER DISTRICT Big Darby-Hellbranch Upper Scioto River Columbus Prairie Twp., SW of Huntington -Stream + Wetlands (05060001) Metro Parks Columbus, Foundation Lower Scioto River Franklin County, Tributaries (05060002- Hellbranch Run 01/02/03/04) (0506001-22-01) Cherry Valley Grand River (04110004) Mt. Pleasant New Lyme Twp., S of Buffalo -Wetland Preservation, Ashtabula-Chagrin River Rod & Gun Sentinel, Ashtabula Ltd. (04110003) Club, County, Conneaut Creek Grand River Peters Creek-Mill Creek (04120101) Partners, Inc. (04110004-04-02) Grand River Lowlands Ashtabula-Chagrin River Mt. Pleasant Orwell Twp., W of Buffalo -Wetland Preservation, (04110003) Rod & Gun Orwell, Ltd. Grand River (04110004) Club, Ashtabula County, Cuyahoga River Grand River Mill Creek-Grand River (04110002) Partners, Inc. (0410004-03-03) Granger Black-Rocky River ODNR Granger Twp., Buffalo -Stream + Wetlands (04110001-01, 04110001- Division of Medina county, Foundation 02, 04110001-06) Wildlife North Branch West Cuyahoga River Branch Rocky River (04110002) within (04110001-01-02) Cuyahoga, Summit, Medina Counties Great Miami Upper Great Miami River Five Rivers Perry Twp., SW of Huntington (Trotwood) (05080001-14/18/19/20) Metro Parks Trotwood, Mitigation Bank Lower Great Miami River Montgomery County, -Five Rivers MetroParks (05080002-01/02/03/04/07) Headwaters Bear Creek (05080002-04-01)
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    THE POWER OF OUR NETWORK ANNUAL 2018 REPORT 2018 BY THE NUMBERS CELEBRATING 30 YEARS AND THE VIBRANT FUTURE OF OUR NETWORK 4,146 500 River Network was founded thirty years ago to strengthen local efforts to protect rivers. Over three INDIVIDUALS HOURS OF SUPPORT educated through decades our focus has remained remarkably consistent: We connect people to save rivers. That provided in simple tagline belies a tremendous amount of action to protect and restore waters across the country, particularly at the local level. Today this network is over 6,000 strong. 88 38 As backbone to this network, we educate and empower champions to effectively engage their EVENTS (River Rally, communities, influence decision makers, assert their opinion on policy change, and translate DIRECT strategies from our national network into local solutions for healthy rivers and clean water. Every webinars, and workshops) CONSULTATIONS day, thousands of these local champions are working across the U.S. Take a moment to meet our network and learn their stories. River Network began by helping river and watershed organizations expand protections for $80,000 13,385 pristine rivers. Since then our ambitions, leadership, and programs have evolved to align with our SCHOLARSHIPS granted to understanding of what rivers need to remain healthy, the challenges of a changing climate, and VOLUNTEERS attended significant shifts in the social, political, and economic context of water. While remaining committed to bolstering local groups and grassroots efforts, we now build Nicole Silk 141 24 coalitions across sectors—uniting NGOs, tribal nations, government agencies, and businesses RIVER RALLY PARTICIPANTS RIVER NETWORK to achieve bigger impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometric Factors in the Formation of Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands C
    P1: GIM TJ1095-03 TJ-AEM.cls May 27, 2004 9:29 Morphometric factors in the formation of Great Lakes coastal wetlands C. E. Herdendorf Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA; E-mail: [email protected] The Great Lakes basins were carved from ancient river valleys by continental ice sheets that receded from the region less than 10,000 years ago. Not only did the glaciers create the basins now holding the lakes, but they are responsible for many of the shallow depressions in the coastal margin that have since developed as coastal wetlands of various types. For the past four thousand years, coastal processes in the lakes have further modified the shore topography to form embayments, coastal lagoons, estuaries, deltas, and solution basins where thousands of hectares of wetlands have become established. This paper will explore the origin of the various morphometric forms which these wetlands have taken and their characteristic hydrologic processes. Keywords: estuaries, geomorphology, karst, lacustrine, palustrine, physiography Physiography of the Great Lakes gin of the waning ice sheet retreated northward into the newly carved lake basins, some of which were dammed The five adjoining Laurentian Great Lakes— by glacial end moraines. The early ice-margin lakes ex- Superior, Michigan, Huron, Erie, and Ontario—extend panded as the glacial ice masses shrank. However, as 1,370 km from westernmost point to easternmost point new and lower outlets were uncovered to the north, the and 1,130 km from north to south (Figure 1). With lakes drained to ever lowering levels except during peri- a total surface area of 244,160 km2, this is the largest ods of minor readvances of the ice front (Hough, 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Wetland Restoration Considerations in the Maumee River and Bay
    UNIQUE WETLAND RESTORATION CONSIDERATIONS IN THE MAUMEE RIVER AND BAY Phil Hicks, P.E., Hull & Associates, Inc. Cassie Lovall, ERT Contractor, NOAA Restoration Center Ohio Stormwater Conference Kalahari Resort & Conference Center, Sandusky, Ohio May 12, 2017 Sandusky LOWER MAUMEE RIVER AND BAY CONDITIONS Hosts largest fish spawning migrations of any Great Lakes tributary Lower Maumee River and Maumee Bay has filled and hardened shoreline . Floodplain wetland habitat is almost non-existent . Essential for healthy fish communities and wildlife Maumee River Beneficial Use Impairments (BUIs) include BUI 3: Degradation of Fish and Wildlife Populations and BUI 14: Loss of Fish and Wildlife Habitat This area absolutely needs more wetlands . Fish nursery habitat is a special need CITY OF TOLEDO’S PENN 7 FORMER CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY RESTORATION PENN 7 RESTORATION OPPORTUNITY Former confined disposal facility . Filled in 1972 – 1973 with approximately one million cubic yards of dredged material from the Toledo shipping channel . Berm surrounds perimeter . Heights range from 3 -12 feet . Creates a hydrologic barrier between the land and river . Interior area with hydric soils supports some wetland vegetation, but wetlands are isolated from the river, dry completely for at least a portion of the year, and have little value as wildlife habitat . Owned by City of Toledo NOAA GREAT LAKES RESTORATION INITIATIVE GRANT City of Toledo sought and received a $175,000 NOAA GLRI grant in 2015 . Site characterization activities and feasibility study to determine the restoration potential of creating emergent coastal/floodplain wetland habitat at Penn 7 . City of Toledo hired the Hull Project Team (MBI, Stock Drilling, Garcia Surveyors, Pace Aalytical) to complete activities.
    [Show full text]