DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Canadian Nuclear Laboratories: Nuclear S&T and Innovation R. Speranzini •Canadian Industry •CANDU & Priorities/Interests 2015 July 7 •Program, Facilities & Budgets •Collaborations UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -1- Organization of Canada’s Nuclear Industry PROVINCIAL PARLIAMENT OF CANADA GOVERNMENTS NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA ELECTRICAL UTILITIES Hon. Greg Rickford Ontario Power Generation, Minister Hydro-Québec, NB Power, ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LTD CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY PRIVATE INDUSTRY Peter Currie, Chair COMMISSION Bruce Power, SNC Board of Directors Michael Binder, President Candu Energy, OCI, etc Canadian Nuclear Laboratories CNL Robert Walker, President Supply Chain UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ 2 AECL History • Birthplace of Canada’s nuclear industry • First sustained nuclear criticality outside USA • AECL established as a Crown Corporation in 1952 • Co-60 for 1st cancer treatment in Canada, & commercial isotopes (e.g. Mo-99) • Developed CANDU power reactor technology • Research reactors and materials R&D (NRU, NRX, ZED-2) UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -3- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Canadian Nuclear Industry • ~$6 billion per year industry • 60,000 workers across Canada, 200 company supply chain • CANDU® reactors operated safely for 50 years • 60% of Ontario electricity and 17% of Canadian electricity • World leader in peaceful use of nuclear technology UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -4- 31 CANDU Reactors in Operation Around the World and 16 in India based on CANDU Design Romania Cernavoda 2 units Ontario, Canada Darlington 4 units Republic of Korea Pickering 6 units Wolsong 4 units Bruce 8 units China Qinshan 2 units New Brunswick, Canada India Point Lepreau 1 unit 2 CANDU units + 16 HWR units Argentina Pakistan Embalse 1 unit KANUPP 1 unit Point Lepreau, Canada Pickering, Canada Qinshan, China AECL Restructuring Government of Canada AECL Canadian Nuclear CANDU Reactor Laboratories (CNL) Division Phase 2 Phase 1 restructuring restructuring (underway) (Completed 2011 Oct) UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -6- CNL’s Canadian Footprint NPD LaPrade Chalk River Laboratories Manitoba Quebec Gentilly 1 Ontario Glace Bay New Whiteshell Brunswick Laboratories Port Hope / Granby Douglas Point The Chalk River Laboratories is the single largest science and technology laboratory in Canada. • ~ 9,000 acres in size , ~200 acres lab complex • 17 nuclear facilities, 70 major buildings • 3,400 employees (~600 PhDs and Masters) • 1,700 engineering, scientific, and technical staff UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -8- Missions A broad mandate, serving both government and private sector Decommissioning Science and Science and & Waste Technology for Technology for Management Government Industry UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -9- CNL’s Science & Technology Priorities • Understand and address public perceptions of radiation • Enable CANDU as a key contributor to Canada’s energy portfolio • Understand, prevent and mitigate risks associated with nuclear operations • Advance knowledge base for informed standards and regulation • Enhance national and global nuclear security • Secure options for future energy needs and sustainability via nuclear technology • Develop and demonstrate minimal impact on the environment UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -10- CANDU Evolution Gen IV Continuous Development Towards CANDU SCWR the Future NRCan & AECL-CNL Innovation \ lead R&D Enhanced AFCR CANDU 6 Products, Understanding Services & IP \ CANDU Energy lead Knowledge Knowledge CANDU 6 Continually enhance both the design and applications based on Products, Services & IP the CANDU concept Years AECL - OFFICIAL USE ONLY / À USAGE EXCLUSIF - EACL 11 Advanced Fuel Cycle Flexibility and Reactor Synergies AECL - OFFICIAL USE ONLY / À USAGE EXCLUSIF - EACL 12 Priorities and Areas of Interest •CANDU Life Extension • Bruce Units 1 & 2 returned in 2012 after life extension projects • Point Lepreau Refurbishment complete in 2012 • Wolsong 1 Retube complete in 2011 •Next generation of CANDU reactors • AFCR • Advanced Fuel and Fuel Cycles • Applications beyond electricity production; e.g. district heating, process heating, etc •SMRs • 2-10 MWe or vSMRs (<1 MWe) for off-grid remote communities • Up to 300 MWe for replacement of fossil plants •Fast Reactors • Discussion in Canada in context of waste management AECL - OFFICIAL USE ONLY / À USAGE EXCLUSIF - EACL 13 CNL Centres of Excellence Unique capabililities; strategic advantage AECL’s 10 Centres of Excellence (CoE) represent a unique blend of people, tools and technologies, which provide an innovative and strategic nuclear science & technology capability. Through these we create new business opportunities, drive global competitive advantage and generate commercial and public policy benefits. 1. Nuclear and Radioactive Material 6. Advanced Nuclear Fuels and Fuel Cycles Management 7. Systems Engineering 2. Irradiation and Post-Irradiation Services 3. Nuclear Safety 8. Advanced Computing, Modelling and Simulation 4. Radiation Biology, Radioecology and Dosimetry 9. Hydrogen and Hydrogen Isotopes Management 5. Materials and Chemistry in Nuclear Applications 10. Environmental Remediation and Nuclear Waste Management UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -14- Unique Radioactive Materials S&T Fuel/Actinides Thermalhydraulics Surface Science Hot Cells NRU Reactor Biological Research ZED-2 Reactor UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -15- More than 50 unique S&T Facilities Analytical Chemistry Laboratories Impact Fretting-Wear Facility Biofouling and Biocorrosion Facilities Large Scale Containment Facility Biological Research Facility Large-Scale Vented Combustion Test Facility CAN-DECON Test Loops #2 and #3 Laser Dimensioning Chemical and Corrosion Autoclave and Loop Test Laser Welding Facility Co-60 Gamma Irradiation Facility Mechanical Testing Laboratories Containment Chemistry Laboratory Metallographic Services Laboratory Core Disassembly Facility Model Development Laboratory Deformation Technology Calandria Tube Burst Test and Molten Fuel Moderator Interaction Facility Creep Rupture Testing Laboratory Nuclear Reactor Universal (NRU) Delayed Hydride Cracking Facility Nuclear Instrumentation Development Laboratory Digital Radiography and Computer Tomography RD-14M Experimental Facility Environmental Technologies Branch Recycle Fuel Fabrication Laboratories Fission Products Behaviour Laboratory Single-Specimen Uniaxial-Stress Thermal Creep Fluid Sealing Technology Metrology Facility Small Scale Burst Test Facility Fuel Development Branch Strainer Test Facilities Gammacell 220 Cobalt-60 Irradiator Facility Surface Science Laboratories GEANT4 Dynamic Simulation Facility Thermalhydraulics Laboratory Health Physics Neutron Generator Transmission Electron Microscopy Laboratory High Bay and Laboratories Tritium Facility High Pressure Water Test Loop Facilities Van de Graaff Accelerator Facility High Temperature and Pressure Test Loop Facilities X-Ray Diffraction Laboratory High Temperature Fuel Channel Laboratory ZED-2 Research Reactor UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -16- Building the future Enabling current and future success – investment in CRL infrastructure Fuel Packaging & Hydrogen Isotopes Multipurpose Storage Facility Technology Facility Science Facility – Building 350 UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ -17- Federal Nuclear S&T Budget Year Budget (in million CAN $) 2010-2011 307 2011-2012 134 2012-2013 105 2013-2014 107 2014-2015 108 2015-2016 109 Collaborations with Canadian Universities 27 Universities across Canada University of New Brunswick University of British Columbia Mount Allison University St. Francis Xavier University Simon Fraser University Carleton University St. Mary’s University University of Alberta Trent University McGill University University of Calgary University of Ottawa Université de Sherbrooke Laurentian University Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal University of Manitoba Queens University University of Saskatchewan Trent University University of Waterloo University of Ontario Institute of Technology Royal Military College University of Toronto McMaster University University of Guelph University of Western Ontario Ryerson 19 19 International Cooperation •Multilateral •NEA •IAEA – including INPRO •Gen IV •IFNEC •Bilateral – Government •US INERI •Euratom •Bilateral – Laboratory, Institutes & Universities •China •Argentina •Romania •India •etc 20 20 Summary & Other Considerations •S&T for Government •complete with AECL restructuring •S&T for Industry on a Commercial basis •Commercial S&T for nuclear industry on-going •Nuclear innovation partnerships •Non-nuclear industry services •Exploring an Industry Driven Innovation Agenda •Understand the potential value to Canada of a cost-shared R&D initiative •Research Reactor •NRU scheduled to shut down •Collaborations Support the Technology Base .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAFETY RE-ASSESSMENT of AECL TEST and RESEARCH REACTORS D. J. WINFIELD Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories ATOMIC ENERGY of CANADA
    309 IAEA-SM-310/ 94 SAFETY RE-ASSESSMENT OF AECL TEST AND RESEARCH REACTORS D. J. WINFIELD Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories ATOMIC ENERGY OF CANADA LIMITED 310 IAEA-SM-310/94 SAFETY RE-ASSESSMENT OF AECL TEST AND RESEARCH REACTORS ABSTRACT Atomic Energy of Canada Limited currently has four operating engineering test/research reactors of various sizes and ages; a new isotope-production reactor MAPLE-X10, under construction at Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories (CRNL), and a heating demonstration/test reactor, SDR, undergoing high-power commissioning at Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment (WNRE). The company is also performing design studies of small reactors for hot water and electricity production. The older reactors are ZED-2, PTR, NRX and NRU; these range in age from 42 years (NRX) to 29 years (ZED-2). Since 1984, limited-scope safety re-assessments have been underway on three of these reactors (ZED-2, NRX and NRU). ZED-2 and PTR are operated by the Reactor Physics Branch, all other reactors are operated by the respective site Reactor Operations Branches. For the older reactors the original safety reports produced were entirely deterministic in nature and based on the design-basis accident concept. The limited scope safety re-assessments for these older reactors, carried out over the past 5 years, have comprised both quantitative probabilistic safety-assessment techniques, such as event tree and fault tree analysis, and/or qualitative techniques, such as failure mode and effect analysis. The technique used for an individual assessment was dependent upon the specific scope required. This paper discusses the types of analyses carried out, specific insights/recommendations resulting from the analysis and indicates the plan for future analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Heu Repatriation Project
    HEU REPATRIATION PROJECT RATIONALE In April 2010, the governments of Canada and the United States (U.S.) committed to work cooperatively to repatriate spent highly- enriched uranium (HEU) fuel currently stored at the Chalk River Laboratories in Ontario to the U.S. as part of the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, a broad international effort to consolidate HEU inventories in fewer locations around the world. This initiative PROJECT BACKGROUND promotes non-proliferation This HEU is the result of two decades of nuclear fuel use at the by removing existing weapons Chalk River Laboratories for Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) grade material from Canada research reactors, the National Research Experimental (NRX) and and transferring it to the National Research Universal (NRU), and for the production of U.S., which has the capability medical isotopes in the NRU, which has benefitted generations of to reprocess it for peaceful Canadians. Returning this material to the U.S. in its existing solid purposes. In March 2012, and liquid forms ensures that this material is stored safely in a Prime Minister Harper secure highly guarded location, or is reprocessed into other forms announced that Canada and that can be used for peaceful purposes. the U.S. were expanding their efforts to return additional Alternative approaches have been carefully considered and inventories of HEU materials, repatriation provides the safest, most secure, and fastest solution including those in liquid form. for the permanent disposition of these materials, thereby eliminating a liability for future generations of Canadians. For more information on this project contact: Email: [email protected] Canadian Nuclear Laboratories 1-866-886-2325 or visit: www.cnl.ca persons who have a legitimate need to PROJECT GOAL know, such as police or emergency response To repatriate highly-enriched uranium forces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Sector at a Crossroads: Fostering Innovation and Energy Security for Canada and the World
    THE NUCLEAR SECTOR AT A CROSSROADS: FOSTERING INNOVATION AND ENERGY SECURITY FOR CANADA AND THE WORLD Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources James Maloney Chair JUNE 2017 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Tering Distributions Using MCNP Simulations of Critical Measurements and Simplified Calculation Benchmarks K.S
    International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology 2007 DOI: Assessment of evaluated (n,d) energy-angle elastic scat- tering distributions using MCNP simulations of critical measurements and simplified calculation benchmarks K.S. Kozier Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada, K0J 1J0 Abstract. Different evaluated (n,d) energy-angle elastic scattering distributions produce k-effective differences in MCNP5 simulations of critical experiments involving heavy water (D2O) of sufficient magnitude to suggest a need for new (n,d) scattering measurements and/or distributions derived from modern theoretical nuclear models, especially at neutron energies below a few MeV. The present work focuses on the small reactivity change of <1 mk that is observed in the MCNP5 D2O coolant-void-reactivity calculation bias for simulations of two pairs of critical experiments performed in the ZED-2 reactor at the Chalk River Laboratories when different nuclear data libraries are used for deuterium. The deuterium data libraries tested include ENDF/B-VII.0, ENDF/B-VI.4, JENDL-3.3 and a new evaluation, labelled Bonn-B, which is based on recent theoretical nuclear-model calculations. Comparison calculations were also performed for a simplified, two-region, spherical model having an inner, 250-cm radius, homogeneous sphere of UO2, without and with deuterium, and an outer 20-cm-thick deuterium reflector. 1 Introduction The present work focuses on the sensitivity of the ZED-2 MCNP5 CVR calculation bias to
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear in Canada NUCLEAR ENERGY a KEY PART of CANADA’S CLEAN and LOW-CARBON ENERGY MIX Uranium Mining & Milling
    Nuclear in Canada NUCLEAR ENERGY A KEY PART OF CANADA’S CLEAN AND LOW-CARBON ENERGY MIX Uranium Mining & Milling . Nuclear electricity in Canada displaces over 50 million tonnes of GHG emissions annually. Electricity from Canadian uranium offsets more than 300 million tonnes of GHG emissions worldwide. Uranium Processing – Re ning, Conversion, and Fuel Fabrication Yellowcake is re ned at Blind River, Ontario, PELLETS to produce uranium trioxide. At Port Hope, Ontario, Nuclear Power Generation and Nuclear Science & uranium trioxide is At plants in southern Technology TUBES converted. URANIUM DIOXIDE Ontario, fuel pellets are UO2 is used to fuel CANDU loaded into tubes and U O UO URANIUM Waste Management & Long-term Management 3 8 3 nuclear reactors. assembled into fuel YUKON TRIOXIDE UO2 Port Radium YELLOWCAKE REFINING URANIUM bundles for FUEL BUNDLE Shutdown or Decommissioned Sites TRIOXIDE UF is exported for 6 CANDU reactors. UO enrichment and use Rayrock NUNAVUT 3 CONVERSION UF Inactive or Decommissioned Uranium Mines and 6 in foreign light water NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Tailings Sites URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE reactors. 25 cents 400 kg of COAL Beaverlodge, 2.6 barrels of OIL Gunnar, Lorado NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR McClean Lake = 3 Cluff Lake FUEL PELLET Rabbit Lake of the world’s 350 m of GAS BRITISH COLUMBIA Cigar Lake 20% McArthur River production of uranium is NVERSION Key Lake QUEBEC CO mined and milled in northern FU EL ALBERTA SASKATCHEWAN MANITOBA F Saskatchewan. AB G R University of IN IC ONTARIO P.E.I. IN A Saskatchewan The uranium mining F T E IO 19 CANDU reactors at Saskatchewan industry is the largest R N TRIUMF NEW BRUNSWICK Research Council NOVA SCOTIA private employer of Gentilly-1 & -2 Whiteshell Point Lepreau 4 nuclear power generating stations Rophton NPD Laboratories Indigenous people in CANDU REACTOR Chalk River Laboratories Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • The AECL Chalk River Laboratories (CRL) Was Established in 1944 In
    WM’05 Conference, February 27 – March 3, 2005, Tucson, AZ STORED LIQUID WASTE REMEDIATION PROGRAM, PHASE 1, AT CHALK RIVER LABORATORIES R.P. Denault, P. Heeney, E. Plaice, K. Schruder, Waste Remediation & Enhancement Projects Division D. Wilder, Site Engineering & Project Management Division W. Graham, Components & Systems Division AECL, Chalk River Laboratories, MS #E4 Chalk River, ON, Canada K0J 1J0 [email protected] ABSTRACT Liquid intermediate- and high-level radioactive wastes presently stored in 21 tanks at the Chalk River Laboratories are being retrieved, conditioned and consolidated into a new storage system. The Liquid Waste Transfer and Storage project is responsible for designing, constructing and commissioning the storage system, specifying and procuring retrieval and transfer equipment and developing operating, maintenance and training procedures and materials. The project has characterized the existing wastes and completed an inspection of the present storage tanks and vaults. The conceptual design has progressed to include a criticality safety assessment, a safeguards analysis, selection of retrieval and transfer technologies and conceptual design of the new storage system. The transfer and collection of wastes from these 21 tanks will be a step forward in the goal of achieving a long-term management solution for the wastes. This paper provides an overview of the development of the conceptual design, including the new storage system, the retrieval system and the transfer systems, the laboratory program that supports the blending sequence and waste conditioning and the tank and vault inspection. INTRODUCTION Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) is a Federal Crown Corporation charged with leading the development of peaceful applications of nuclear technology in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • NPR81: South Korea's Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel
    JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON Viewpoint South Korea’s Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel Reprocessing JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON1 Dr. Jungmin Kang was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Center for Energy and Environmental Studies (CEES), Princeton University in 1999-2000. He is the author of forthcoming articles in Science & Global Security and Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. Dr. H.A. Feiveson is a Senior Research Scientist at CEES and a Co- director of Princeton’s research Program on Nuclear Policy Alternatives. He is the Editor of Science and Global Security, editor and co-author of The Nuclear Turning Point: A Blueprint for Deep Cuts and De-alerting of Nuclear Weapons (Brookings Institution, 1999), and co-author of Ending the Threat of Nuclear Attack (Stanford University Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1997). rom the beginning of its nuclear power program could reduce dependence on imported uranium. During in the 1970s, the Republic of Korea (South Ko- the 1990s, the South Korean government remained con- Frea) has been intermittently interested in the cerned about energy security but also began to see re- reprocessing of nuclear-power spent fuel. Such repro- processing as a way to address South Korea’s spent fuel cessing would typically separate the spent fuel into three disposal problem. Throughout this entire period, the constituent components: the unfissioned uranium re- United States consistently and effectively opposed all maining in the spent fuel, the plutonium produced dur- reprocessing initiatives on nonproliferation grounds. We ing reactor operation, and the highly radioactive fission review South Korea’s evolving interest in spent fuel re- products and transuranics other than plutonium.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Generation Option
    Maritime Link Appendix 6.01 Page 1 of 24 THE NUCLEAR GENERATION OPTION Prepared for Emera Inc. November 28, 2012 Maritime Link Appendix 6.01 Page 2 of 24 The Nuclear Generation Option 1.0 Introduction The objective of this report is to provide a general overview of the nuclear generation option by providing an overview of the technology, a summary of the experience in Canada with nuclear generation, and generalized or indicative estimates of the costs of constructing and operating nuclear power plants. The information contained in the report is drawn from publicly available sources and while Barra Strategies Incorporated has attempted to verify the quality of the information contained in the report, it may contain inaccuracies. In 2009, nuclear generation produced 15% of the electricity produced in Canada in 2009 and accounted for over 16.5% of the global production. Electricity Production by Fuel Source in TWh (2009) Fuel Source Canada World Coal and Peat 91.6 8,119 Oil 8.3 1,027 Gas 37.5 4,301 Biofuels 6.5 217 Waste 0.2 2,697 Hydro 364.0 3,329 Nuclear 90.4 2,697 Geothermal 0 67 Solar PV 0.1 20 Solar Thermal 0.0 1 Wind 4.5 273 Tide <0.1 <1 Other 10 TOTAL 603.2 20,132 Source: International Energy Agency 2.0 Nuclear Generation Technologies 2.1 Current Reactors There are a wide range of nuclear reactor technologies currently in service around the world. In all the designs, the heat produced by the continuous fission of atoms in the fuel is used to produce steam.
    [Show full text]
  • National Neutron Strategy-Draft
    DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION A National Strategy for Materials Research with Neutron Beams: Discussion on a “National Neutron Strategy” This consultation draft was updated in February 2021, following the outcomes of the Canadian Neutron Initiative Roundtable: Towards a National Neutron Strategy, organized in partnership with CIFAR on December 15–16, 2020. 1 DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION This Canadian Neutron Initiative (CNI) discussion paper and associated Roundtable Meeting are produced in partnership with CIFAR. We also thank the following sponsors: 2 DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Contents 1 Executive summary and overview of the national neutron strategy ................................................... 5 2 Consultation on the strategy ................................................................................................................ 9 3 The present: A strong foundation for continued excellence .............................................................. 10 3.1 The Canadian neutron beam user community ........................................................................... 10 3.2 McMaster University ................................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Other neutron beam capabilities and interests .......................................................................... 15 4 Forging foreign partnerships ............................................................................................................... 17 4.1 Global renewal of advanced neutron sources ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chalk River Laboratories
    Canada’s Nuclear Sacrifice Area Considerations related to the relicensing of the Chalk River Laboratories a brief submitted to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission by the Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County prepared by Gordon Edwards Ph.D. September 6, 2011 Considerations related to the relicensing of the Chalk River Laboratories Table of Contents List of Recommendations 3 Introduction 5 The Licence Application 6 Plan of the Present Submission 9 Importance of the NRU Reactor 10 The Reason for the 2007 Shutdown 11 The NRX Accident 12 The Nuclear Safety Culture 14 The Authority and Independence of the CNSC 15 The MAPLE Reactors 17 The NRU Reactor Vessel Leak of 2009 18 A Caveat on the Continued Operation of NRU 20 Mitigating Radioactive Releases at CRL 22 Case 1: The Rod Bay Leak (onsite) Case 2: Tritium Effluents into the Ottawa River (offsite) Reporting Radioactive Emissions from CRL 26 The Hazards of Isotope Production 28 Deterioration of the FISST 30 Eliminating Weapons Grade Uranium 32 Repatriation of Irradiated HEU to the USA 33 Map and Inventory of Radioactive Wastes at CRL 35 The Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program 36 Appendix: Towards a Healthy Regulatory Culture 39 2 Considerations related to the relicensing of the Chalk River Laboratories List of Recommendations: 1. That the CRL licence application be split into several: one for the NRU reactor (and perhaps the Z-2 reactor as well), one for the isotope production operation (including FISST and HEU), one for the radioactive waste storage tanks and dumps (including the remediation work affecting degraded irradiated fuel elements, underground plumes and radioactive sediments in the Ottawa River), and one for the multitude of buildings, radioisotope laboratories, defunct facilities and other activities at CRL.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Radioactive Waste in Canada 2016 Inventory of Radioactive Waste in Canada 2016 Ix X 1.0 INVENTORY of RADIOACTIVE WASTE in CANADA OVERVIEW
    Inventory of RADIOACTIVE WASTE in CANADA 2016 Inventory of RADIOACTIVE WASTE in CANADA 2016 Photograph contributors: Cameco Corp.: page ix OPG: page 34 Orano Canada: page x Cameco Corp.: page 47 BWX Technologies, Inc.: page 2 Cameco Corp.: page 48 OPG: page 14 OPG: page 50 OPG: page 23 Cameco Corp.: page 53 OPG: page 24 Cameco Corp.: page 54 BWX Technologies, Inc.: page 33 Cameco Corp.: page 62 For information regarding reproduction rights, contact Natural Resources Canada at [email protected]. Aussi disponible en français sous le titre : Inventaire des déchets radioactifs au Canada 2016. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2018 Cat. No. M134-48/2016E-PDF (Online) ISBN 978-0-660-26339-7 CONTENTS 1.0 INVENTORY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN CANADA OVERVIEW ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 1�1 Radioactive waste definitions and categories �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 1�1�1 Processes that generate radioactive waste in canada ����������������������������� 3 1�1�2 Disused radioactive sealed sources ����������������������������������������� 6 1�2 Responsibility for radioactive waste �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6 1�2�1 Regulation of radioactive
    [Show full text]
  • Tritium Releases and Dose Consequences in Canada in 2006 Part of the Tritium Studies Project
    Canada’s Nuclear Regulator Tritium Releases and Dose Consequences in Canada in 2006 Part of the Tritium Studies Project INFO-0793 December 2009 TRITIUM RELEASES AND DOSE CONSEQUENCES IN CANADA IN 2006 Tritium Releases and Dose Consequences in Canada in 2006 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada 2009 Catalogue number CC172-52/2009E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-13930-2 Published by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Catalogue number: INFO-0793 Extracts from this document may be reproduced for individual use without permission provided the source is fully acknowledged. However, reproduction in whole or in part for purposes of resale or redistribution requires prior written permission from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Également publié en français sous le titre de : Rejets de tritium et conséquences sur les doses au Canada en 2006 Document availability This document can be viewed on the CNSC Web site at nuclearsafety.gc.ca. To order a printed copy of the document in English or French, please contact: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 280 Slater Street P.O. Box 1046, Station B Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5S9 CANADA Tel.: 613-995-5894 or 1-800-668-5284 (in Canada only) Facsimile: 613-995-5086 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: nuclearsafety.gc.ca Cover images (from left to right) 1. Tritium occurs as a byproduct of the operation of nuclear and research reactors. Pictured is a stack at Bruce A nuclear generating station. 2. Tritium is used in the production of self-luminescent lights, like Exit signs. 3. Environmental monitoring is a requirement of a CNSC licence.
    [Show full text]