Exorcism-Seekers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EXORCISM-SEEKERS: CLINICAL AND PERSONALITY CORRELATES by M. WESLEY BUCH B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1976 M.A., The University of British Columbia, 1988 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Interdisciplinary Studies We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA May 1994 © M. WESLEY BUCH __________________________ In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives, It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. (Signature) Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date 3c2 DE-6 (2188) Abstract This study was a case control field investigation of a special population. The psychodiagnostic and personality correlates of 40 Christian Charismatic exorcism-seekers were compared to the correlates of 40 matched c2ntrols and 48 randomly selected controls. The study was guided by a central research question: how do exorcism-seekers differ from similar individuals who do not seek exorcism? Two theoretiäal approaches to demonic possession and exorcism anticipated different answers. A mental illness approach anticipated the report of certain forms of clinical distress among exorcism-seekers. A social role approach anticipated the report of certain personality traits that would facilitate the effective enactment of the demoniac role. Results supported the mental illness approach to demonic possession inasmuch as numerous between-group diagnostic differences achieved statistical significance, especially mood disturbance. The exorcism-seeker’s group produced a modal dependent-avoidant personality disorder profile, although schizoid features best distinguished between exorcism-seekers and control subjects. However, half of the sample did not report significant psychological distress. A cognitive-behavioral model of demonic possession of relevance to both distressed and non-distressed exorcism-seekers was therefore proposed. Treatment implications included a discussion of special treatment problems and collaboration between members of the clergy and the health care professions. 11 Table of Contents Page Abstract ii List of Tables vii List of Figures xi Acknowledgments xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 The Central Research Question 2 The Need for the Study 3 Definition of Key Terms 3 Summary of Method 4 An Interdisciplinary Research Context 4 Appropriateness of Research Topic for Scientific Study 5 Organization of Chapters 6 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 8 The Charismatic Movement, Exorcism and Demonic Possession 8 Psychological Factors Regarding Charismatic Christians 26 Psychological Approaches to Demonic Possession and Exorcism 37 111 Discussion of the Present State of Knowledge 86 Objectives 88 Hypotheses 89 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 94 Research Design 94 Subjects 94 Instrumentation 97 Procedures 122 Validity Issues 123 Statistical Plan 125 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS 127 Sample 128 Multivariate Analysis of Questionnaire Variables 142 Univariate F-Test Results of Basic Personality Descriptors 151 Univariate F-Test Results of Psychosocial Vulnerability Factors 152 Univariate F-Test Results of Psychopathology Indicators 165 Univariate F-Test Results of Social Role Variables 188 Univariate F-Test Results of Religious Factors 189 Statistical Results of Exorcism Readiness Factors 194 Discriminant Analysis 196 iv CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION .209 Sample Information 209 Questionnaire Information 211 Direction of Causality: An Interpretive Conundrum 229 A Convergent Exorcism-Seeker Profile 230 CHAPTER 6 IMPLICATIONS 232 Implications for Theory Building 232 Treatment Implications Regarding Exorcism-Seeker Distress 236 Treatment Implications Regarding Religious Beliefs 242 Treatment Implications for Pastoral Care 246 Limitations of Study 252 Future Directions 253 Epilogue 257 Bibliography 259 Appendix A A Case Report of Co-existing Demonic Possession and Psychopathology 289 Appendix B Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for DSM-III-R Possession/Trance Disorder 291 Appendix C The Diagnostic Criteria for Transient Dissociative Disturbance 292 Appendix D Diagnostic Criteria for Possession Disorder 293 V TA JiBUUoflsnO dfl-MoJjo%!{ H xjpudd 86 aireuUOnSnO 3UB..IATjOQ qL 0 xjpuddy 96 STJ3JDq3 uosssso uomcj xipuddy t’6 Jp.IOsJQ St3 ATSSSSOd JOJ BUT13 DflSOUTcJ xjpuddy List of Tables Table Page Table 1. Signs of Demonic Behavioral Displays 20 Table 2. Item #24 and #490 Endorsement of MMPI & MMPI-2 24 Table 3. Review of Demonic Possession Diagnostic Studies 58 Table 4. Categories of Possession Syndrome (Yap, 1960) 64 Table 5. List of Primary Hypotheses 90 Table 6. List of Dependent Measures 98 Table 7. Table of Theoretical Constructs Underlying MCMI-II Personality Disorder Scales 108 Table 8. Table of MCMI-II Scales 109 Table 9. Table of Response Set Group Means and Significance of Independent t Tests 124 Table 10. Contingency Table of Demographic Variables with Chi Square Significance 130 Table 11. Table of Exorcism-Seeker Occupations According to the Hollingshead Occupational Scale 135 vii Table 12. Table of Medical Information, Substance Abuse and Childhood Abuse 140 Table 13. Table of Past or Present Psychological Diagnosis 141 Table 14. Maximum and Median Correlations Between Demographic and Questionnaire Variables 143 Table 15. Table of Control Group and Exorcism-Seeker Skewness (Skew), Kurtosis (Kurt), Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness of Fit Values (K-S z) and Bartlett-Box Significance 145 Table 16. Table of Questionnaire Group Means and Results of MANOVA 153 Table 17. Table of Openness to Experience (NEO-PI) Group Means and Significance of Independent t Tests 157 Table 18. Table of Life-Event Stress and Social Support Group Means and Significance of Independent t Tests 160 Table 19. Intercorrelational Matrix of Dysphoria, Neuroticism, Life Event Stress, Self-Efficacy, Social Isolation and Social Support Variables 163 Table 20. ANOVA Table for Psychosocial Vulnerability Multiple Regression 164 viii Table 21. Table of Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised (MAACL-R) Subscale Group Means and Significance of Independent tTests 166 Table 22. Table of Critical Item Scales Group Means and Significance of Independent t Tests 170 Table 23. Table of Leyton Obsessional Inventory (Modified) Group Means and Significance of Independent t Tests 171 Table 24. Comparison of QED Exorcism-Seeker and Other Clinical Group Univariate Statistics 173 Table 25. Factor Loadings on MCMI-II Personality Scales 175 Table 26. Table of MCMI-II Personality Factor Means and Significance of Univariate F Tests 177 Table 27. Table of Frequency and Proportion of Highest MCMI-II Scale Elevations among Exorcism-Seekers 180 Table 28. Table of Basic Personality Scale (Scales 1-8B) High-Point Configural Combinations among Exorcism-Seekers 184 Table 29. Number and Proportion of Exorcism-Seeker Scores Within and Above the Average Range of Control Group Scores 187 Table 30. Intercorrelational Matrix of Diabolical Experiences, Neuroticism, Dysphoria and Somatoform Variables 190 ix Table 31. ANOVA Table for Multiple Regression of Diabolical Experiences 192 Table 32. Intercorrelational Matrix of Religious Orientation Scale (ROS) and Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised (MAACL-R) Dysphoria Scales 193 Table 33. Table of Attitudes Toward Exorcism and Exorcism Credibility Means and Significance of Independent t Tests 195 Table 34. Wilks’ Lambda and Univariate F Results of Questionnaire Variables for Exorcism-seekers and Matched Control Subjects.... 199 Table 35. Summary of Steps in Discriminant Analysis 203 Table 36. Canonical Discriminant Functions 205 Table 37. Discriminant Function Coefficients 207 Table 38. Classification Summary 208 Table 39. Support for Primary Hypotheses 212 x List of Figures Figure Page Figure 1. Detail from “Procession of the Possessed of Molenbeek” (Veith, 1965) xiii Figure 2. NEO-Five Factor Inventory T-Score Mean Profile of Male and Female Exorcism-Seeker and Control Groups 158 Figure 3. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Mean Profile 161 Figure 4. Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised Mean T-Score Profile of Male and Female Exorcism-Seeker and Control Groups 168 Figure 5. MCMI-II Median Base Rate Profile of Exorcism-Seekers, Patients Diagnosed With Dependent Personality Disorder, and the MCMI-II Normative Psychiatric Sample 179 xi Acknowledgments I wish to thank my interdisciplinary committee for their guidance and helpful suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript: Dr. John Friesen (Supervisor), Dr. Stanley Coren (Methodologist), Dr. Charles Anderson, Dr. Ehor Boyanowsky and Dr. Jonathan Fleming. I also wish to acknowledge the helpfulness of Dr. Ernest Runions who served on the committee before his death. I am indebted to my parents, Rev. Mark and Hilda Buch, my sister, Ingrid Buch-Wagler, my Irish family, Robert, Martha and Lynn Gibson, my friends, Anne, Barbie, Cam, Jamie, Mike, Patty, Paul, and Ruth, and my work friends in the Back Evaluation and Education Program and Psychology Department of the Worker’s Compensation Board for all their encouragement and support. In