DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1805.06543V1 [Nucl-Th] 16 May 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1805.06543V1 [Nucl-Th] 16 May 2018 Temperature Dependence of the Neutron Lifespan Cheng Tao Yanga, Jeremiah Birrellb, Johann Rafelskia aDepartment of Physics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA bDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA (Dated: May 18, 2018) Current precision big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) studies motivate us to revisit the neutron lifespan in the plasma medium of the early universe. The mechanism we explore is the Fermi-blocking of decay electrons and neutrinos by plasma. As result, neutrons live longer and we find a significant 6.4% modification of neutron abundance in the BBN era arising from in plasma modification of the neutron lifetime. This effect can influence the final abundances of the light elements in BBN. I. INTRODUCTION and the neutron-proton mass difference (in medium). f The values considered are in the range Xn = 0:15 ∼ 0:17 Element production during BBN is influenced by sev- [1]. A dynamical approach to neutron freezeout is nec- essary to fully understand Xf , we hope to return to this eral parameters, e.g. baryon to photon ratio ηb, num- n challenge in the near future. ber of neutrino species Nν , and neutron to proton ratio, as controlled by both the dynamics of neutron freeze- Following freeze-out the neutron is subject to natural decay and normally the neutron lifetime in vacuum τ 0 out at temperature Tf ≈ 0:8MeV and neutron lifetime. n Since about 200 seconds pass between neutron freeze- is used c.f. Eq. (2) to calculate the neutron abundance out and BBN at T ≈ 0:07MeV, the neutron lifetime resulting in the `desired' value Xn(TBBN ) ≈ 0:13 when is one of the important parameter controlling BBN el- BBN starts. To improve precision a dynamically evolving ement yields [1]. However, the neutron decay in cosmic neutron yield needs to be studied and for this purpose we plasma medium has seemingly never been considered be- explore here the neutron decay which occurs in medium, fore. Therefore, here we study the Fermi suppression ef- not vacuum. This leads to neutron lifespan dependence fects which lengthen the neutron lifetime in the early uni- on temperature of the cosmic medium as the decay occurs verse. The medium dependence of particle decay was rec- for a particle emerged in plasma of electron/positron, ognized by Kuznetsova et al [2], we will use their method neutrino/antineutrino, (and protons). to study the plasma effects on neutron decay in the cos- Two physical effects of the medium influence the neu- mic medium. tron lifetime in the early universe noticeably: After freeze-out, the neutron abundance is subject to • Fermi suppression factors from the medium: Dur- natural decay ing the temperature range Tf > T > TBBN , elec- trons and neutrinos in the background plasma can n −! p + e + νe ; (1) reduce the neutron decay rate by Fermi suppression where the current experimental neutron lifetime quoted to the neutron decay rate. Furthermore, the neu- 0 by the Particle Data Group [3] is τn = 880:2±1:0 sec. The trino background can still provide the suppression latest measurement for neutron lifetime by using magne- after electron/positron pair annihilation becomes togravitational trap is 877:7±0:7 sec [4]. In the standard nearly complete. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, the neutron abundance when nucleosynthesis begins is given by [1] • Photon reheating: When T me the elec- tron/positron annihilation occurs, the entropy from t − t e± is fed into photons, leading to photon reheating. X (T ) = Xf exp − BBN f ≈ 0:13 ; (2) n BBN n τ 0 The already decoupled (frozen-out) neutrinos re- n main undisturbed. Therefore, after annihilation we arXiv:1805.06543v1 [nucl-th] 16 May 2018 f The normalizing neutron freeze-out yield Xn have two different temperatures in cosmic plasma: neutrino temperature Tν and the photon and pro- f f f f nn nn=np ton temperature T respectively. Xn ≡ f f = f f : (3) nn + np 1 + nn=np These two effect will be included in the following explo- f f ration of the neutron lifetime in the early universe as a where nn and np are freeze-out neutron and proton den- sities, respectively. The thermal equilibrium yield ratio function of T . We show how these effects alter the neu- is tron lifespan and obtain the modification of the neutron yield at the time of BBN. Yet another effect was consid- nf ered by Kuznetsova et al [2] which is due to time dilation n = exp (−Q=T ) ;Q = m − m ; (4) f f n p originating in particle thermal motion. In our case for np neutrons with T=m < 10−3 this effect is negligible. Be- assuming a instantanous freeze-out, depends on temper- low we will explicitly assume that the neutron decay is ature Tf at which neutrons decouple from the heat bath, studied in the neutron rest frame. 2 In section II we discuss the general form of the neutron In the following calculation, we assume the condition decay rate in a heat bath, including the Fermi suppres- Tk µν¯; mν , i.e. we consider the massless neutrino sion factors from the medium. In section III we derive in plasma. Substituting the distributions into the decay the relation between neutrino temperature and photon rate formula and using the neutron rest frame, the decay temperature in early universe. In section IV we com- rate can be written as pute the modified neutron abundance due to effects of 2 5 2 the medium and compare with the standard (vacuum) 1 GF Q Vud 2 0 = 3 (1 + 3gA) (1 + RC) (11) result. The implications of these results will be discussed τn 2π in section V. Z 1 ξ(1 − ξ)2 pξ2 − (m =Q)2 × dξ e ; me=Q exp (−Qξ=T ) + 1 exp (−Q(1 − ξ)=Tν ) + 1 II. DECAY RATE IN MEDIUM where Q was defined in Eq. (4) and we integrate using dimensionless variable ξ = Ee=Q. From Eq.(11), the The invariant matrix element for the neutron decay decay rate in vacuum can be written as Eq. (1) for non-relativistic neutron and proton is given 2 5 2 by 1 GF meVud 2 0 0 = 3 (1 + 3gA) (1 + RC) f ; (12) 2 2 2 2 τn 2π hjMj i ≈ 16 GF Vud mnmp(1 + 3gA)(1 + RC)Eν¯Ee; (5) where the phase space factor f 0 is given by where the Fermi constant is GF = 1:1663787 × 10−5 GeV−2, V = 0:97420 is an element of the ud Q 5 Z 1 Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix [5{7], and f 0 ≡ dξ ξ(1 − ξ)2pξ2 − (m =Q)2 m e gA = 1:2755 is the axial current constant for the nucle- e me=Q ons [5, 8]. We also consider the total effect of all radiative = 1:6360: (13) corrections relative to muon decay that have not been absorbed into Fermi constant GF . The most precise cal- The phase space factor is also modified by the Coulomb culation of this correction [6, 8] gives (1+RC) = 1:03886. correction between electron and proton, proton recoil, In the early universe the neutron decay rate in medium, nucleon size correction etc. This has been studied by at finite temperature can be written as [2] Wilkinson [10], and the phase space factor is given by [5, 7, 10] Z 3 3 3 1 1 d pν¯ d pp d pe 0 = 3 3 3 τn 2mn (2π) 2Eν¯ (2π) 2Ep (2π) 2Ee f = 1:6887: (14) 4 4 2 (2π) δ (pn − pp − pe − pν¯) hjMj i These effect amount to adding the factor F to our calcu- 1 − fp(pp) 1 − fe(pe) 1 − fν¯(pν¯) ; (6) lation where we consider this expression in the rest rest frame f F = 0 = 1:0322; (15) of neutron, i.e. pn = (mn; 0). The phase-space factors f (1 − fi) are Fermi suppression factors in the medium. The Fermi-Dirac distributions for electron and non- then the neutron lifespan can be written as relativistic proton are given by τ 0 τ Vacuum = n = 879:481 sec; (16) 1 n F fe = ; (7) eEe=T + 1 2 which compare well to the experiment result 877:7 ± −Ep=T −mp=T −p =2mpT fp = e = e e p : (8) 0:7 sec [4]. In the case of plasma medium, we do not ex- pect that these effect (Coulomb correction between elec- For neutrinos, after neutrino/antineutrino kinetic freeze- tron and proton, proton recoil, nucleon size correction out they become free streaming particles. If we assume etc) are modified in the cosmic plasma. Thus we adapt that kinetic freeze out occurs at some time t and temper- k the factor into our calculation and the neutron decay rate ature T , then for t > t the free streaming distribution k k in the cosmic plasma is given by function can be written as [9] 2 5 2 1 1 GF Q Vud 2 f = ; (9) = (1 + 3gA) (1 + RC) F (17) ν¯ q 2 2 2 Medium 3 E −mν mν µν¯ τn 2π exp T 2 + T 2 + T + 1 ν k k Z 1 ξ(1 − ξ)2 pξ2 − (m =Q)2 × dξ e : for antineutrinos and we define the effective neutrino me=Q exp (−Qξ=T ) + 1 exp (−Q(1 − ξ)=Tν ) + 1 temperature Tν as From Eq.(17) we see that the neuron decay rate in the a(tk) Tν ≡ Tk: (10) early universe depends on both the photon temperature a(t) T and the neutrino effective temperature Tν . 3 III. PHOTON REHEATING ± After neutrino free-out and when me T , the e be- comes non-relativistic and annihilate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles
    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
    [Show full text]
  • Qcd in Heavy Quark Production and Decay
    QCD IN HEAVY QUARK PRODUCTION AND DECAY Jim Wiss* University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 ABSTRACT I discuss how QCD is used to understand the physics of heavy quark production and decay dynamics. My discussion of production dynam- ics primarily concentrates on charm photoproduction data which is compared to perturbative QCD calculations which incorporate frag- mentation effects. We begin our discussion of heavy quark decay by reviewing data on charm and beauty lifetimes. Present data on fully leptonic and semileptonic charm decay is then reviewed. Mea- surements of the hadronic weak current form factors are compared to the nonperturbative QCD-based predictions of Lattice Gauge The- ories. We next discuss polarization phenomena present in charmed baryon decay. Heavy Quark Effective Theory predicts that the daugh- ter baryon will recoil from the charmed parent with nearly 100% left- handed polarization, which is in excellent agreement with present data. We conclude by discussing nonleptonic charm decay which are tradi- tionally analyzed in a factorization framework applicable to two-body and quasi-two-body nonleptonic decays. This discussion emphasizes the important role of final state interactions in influencing both the observed decay width of various two-body final states as well as mod- ifying the interference between Interfering resonance channels which contribute to specific multibody decays. "Supported by DOE Contract DE-FG0201ER40677. © 1996 by Jim Wiss. -251- 1 Introduction the direction of fixed-target experiments. Perhaps they serve as a sort of swan song since the future of fixed-target charm experiments in the United States is A vast amount of important data on heavy quark production and decay exists for very short.
    [Show full text]
  • Mean Lifetime Part 3: Cosmic Muons
    MEAN LIFETIME PART 3: MINERVA TEACHER NOTES DESCRIPTION Physics students often have experience with the concept of half-life from lessons on nuclear decay. Teachers may introduce the concept using M&M candies as the decaying object. Therefore, when students begin their study of decaying fundamental particles, their understanding of half-life may be at the novice level. The introduction of mean lifetime as used by particle physicists can cause confusion over the difference between half-life and mean lifetime. Students using this activity will develop an understanding of the difference between half-life and mean lifetime and the reason particle physicists prefer mean lifetime. Mean Lifetime Part 3: MINERvA builds on the Mean Lifetime Part 1: Dice which uses dice as a model for decaying particles, and Mean Lifetime Part 2: Cosmic Muons which uses muon data collected with a QuarkNet cosmic ray muon detector (detector); however, these activities are not required prerequisites. In this activity, students access authentic muon data collected by the Fermilab MINERvA detector in order to determine the half-life and mean lifetime of these fundamental particles. This activity is based on the Particle Decay activity from Neutrinos in the Classroom (http://neutrino-classroom.org/particle_decay.html). STANDARDS ADDRESSED Next Generation Science Standards Science and Engineering Practices 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking Crosscutting Concepts 1. Patterns 2. Cause and Effect: Mechanism and Explanation 3. Scale, Proportion, and Quantity 4. Systems and System Models 7. Stability and Change Common Core Literacy Standards Reading 9-12.7 Translate quantitative or technical information .
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Higgs Boson Decay Into B-Quarks with the ATLAS Experiment - Run 2 Charles Delporte
    Study of the Higgs boson decay into b-quarks with the ATLAS experiment - run 2 Charles Delporte To cite this version: Charles Delporte. Study of the Higgs boson decay into b-quarks with the ATLAS experiment - run 2. High Energy Physics - Experiment [hep-ex]. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2018. English. NNT : 2018SACLS404. tel-02459260 HAL Id: tel-02459260 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02459260 Submitted on 29 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Study of the Higgs boson decay into b-quarks with the ATLAS experiment run 2 These` de doctorat de l’Universite´ Paris-Saclay prepar´ ee´ a` Universite´ Paris-Sud Ecole doctorale n◦576 Particules, Hadrons, Energie,´ Noyau, Instrumentation, Imagerie, NNT : 2018SACLS404 Cosmos et Simulation (PHENIICS) Specialit´ e´ de doctorat : Physique des particules These` present´ ee´ et soutenue a` Orsay, le 19 Octobre 2018, par CHARLES DELPORTE Composition du Jury : Achille STOCCHI Universite´ Paris Saclay (LAL) President´ Giovanni MARCHIORI Sorbonne Universite´ (LPNHE) Rapporteur Paolo MERIDIANI Universite´ de Rome (INFN), CERN Rapporteur Matteo CACCIARI Universite´ Paris Diderot (LPTHE) Examinateur Fred´ eric´ DELIOT Universite´ Paris Saclay (CEA) Examinateur Jean-Baptiste DE VIVIE Universite´ Paris Saclay (LAL) Directeur de these` Daniel FOURNIER Universite´ Paris Saclay (LAL) Invite´ ` ese de doctorat Th iii Synthèse Le Modèle Standard fournit un modèle élégant à la description des particules élémentaires, leurs propriétés et leurs interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Production and Decay Properties of Bs Mesons Decaying Into J/Psi Phi with the CMS Detector at the LHC
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2012 Measurement of Production and Decay Properties of Bs Mesons Decaying into J/Psi Phi with the CMS Detector at the LHC Giordano Cerizza University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory Commons Recommended Citation Cerizza, Giordano, "Measurement of Production and Decay Properties of Bs Mesons Decaying into J/Psi Phi with the CMS Detector at the LHC. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1279 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Giordano Cerizza entitled "Measurement of Production and Decay Properties of Bs Mesons Decaying into J/Psi Phi with the CMS Detector at the LHC." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Physics. Stefan M. Spanier, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Marianne Breinig, George Siopsis, Robert Hinde Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Measurements of Production and Decay Properties of Bs Mesons Decaying into J/Psi Phi with the CMS Detector at the LHC A Thesis Presented for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Giordano Cerizza May 2012 c by Giordano Cerizza, 2012 All Rights Reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Boosted Higgs Bosons Decaying Into B-Quark
    Eur. Phys. J. C (2019) 79:836 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7335-x Regular Article - Experimental Physics Identification of boosted Higgs bosons decaying into b-quark pairs with the ATLAS detector at 13 TeV ATLAS Collaboration CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Received: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 23 September 2019 © CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS collaboration 2019 Abstract This paper describes a study of techniques for and angular distribution of the jet constituents consistent with identifying Higgs bosons at high transverse momenta decay- a two-body decay and containing two b-hadrons. The tech- ing into bottom-quark pairs, H → bb¯, for proton–proton niques described in this paper to identify Higgs bosons decay- collision data collected by the ATLAS detector√ at the Large ing into bottom-quark pairs have been used successfully in Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy s = 13 TeV. several analyses [8–10] of 13 TeV proton–proton collision These decays are reconstructed from calorimeter jets found data recorded by ATLAS. with the anti-kt R = 1.0 jet algorithm. To tag Higgs bosons, In order to identify, or tag, boosted Higgs bosons it is a combination of requirements is used: b-tagging of R = 0.2 paramount to understand the details of b-hadron identifica- track-jets matched to the large-R calorimeter jet, and require- tion and the internal structure of jets, or jet substructure, in ments on the jet mass and other jet substructure variables. The such an environment [11]. The approach to tagging√ presented Higgs boson tagging efficiency and corresponding multijet in this paper is built on studies from LHC runs at s = 7 and and hadronic top-quark background rejections are evaluated 8 TeV, including extensive studies of jet reconstruction and using Monte Carlo simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Decay Rates and Cross Section
    Decay rates and Cross section Ashfaq Ahmad National Centre for Physics Outlines Introduction Basics variables used in Exp. HEP Analysis Decay rates and Cross section calculations Summary 11/17/2014 Ashfaq Ahmad 2 Standard Model With these particles we can explain the entire matter, from atoms to galaxies In fact all visible stable matter is made of the first family, So Simple! Many Nobel prizes have been awarded (both theory/Exp. side) 11/17/2014 Ashfaq Ahmad 3 Standard Model Why Higgs Particle, the only missing piece until July 2012? In Standard Model particles are massless =>To explain the non-zero mass of W and Z bosons and fermions masses are generated by the so called Higgs mechanism: Quarks and leptons acquire masses by interacting with the scalar Higgs field (amount coupling strength) 11/17/2014 Ashfaq Ahmad 4 Fundamental Fermions 1st generation 2nd generation 3rd generation Dynamics of fermions described by Dirac Equation 11/17/2014 Ashfaq Ahmad 5 Experiment and Theory It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong. Richard P. Feynman A theory is something nobody believes except the person who made it, An experiment is something everybody believes except the person who made it. Albert Einstein 11/17/2014 Ashfaq Ahmad 6 Some Basics Mandelstam Variables In a two body scattering process of the form 1 + 2→ 3 + 4, there are 4 four-vectors involved, namely pi (i =1,2,3,4) = (Ei, pi) Three Lorentz Invariant variables namely s, t and u are defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Kinematics of Particle Interactions Introduction
    le kin rel.tex Relativistic Kinematics of Particle Interactions byW von Schlipp e, March2002 1. Notation; 4-vectors, covariant and contravariant comp onents, metric tensor, invariants. 2. Lorentz transformation; frequently used reference frames: Lab frame, centre-of-mass frame; Minkowski metric, rapidity. 3. Two-b o dy decays. 4. Three-b o dy decays. 5. Particle collisions. 6. Elastic collisions. 7. Inelastic collisions: quasi-elastic collisions, particle creation. 8. Deep inelastic scattering. 9. Phase space integrals. Intro duction These notes are intended to provide a summary of the essentials of relativistic kinematics of particle reactions. A basic familiarity with the sp ecial theory of relativity is assumed. Most derivations are omitted: it is assumed that the interested reader will b e able to verify the results, which usually requires no more than elementary algebra. Only the phase space calculations are done in some detail since we recognise that they are frequently a bit of a struggle. For a deep er study of this sub ject the reader should consult the monograph on particle kinematics byByckling and Ka jantie. Section 1 sets the scene with an intro duction of the notation used here. Although other notations and conventions are used elsewhere, I present only one version which I b elieveto b e the one most frequently encountered in the literature on particle physics, notably in such widely used textb o oks as Relativistic Quantum Mechanics by Bjorken and Drell and in the b o oks listed in the bibliography. This is followed in section 2 by a brief discussion of the Lorentz transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Test of Lepton Universality in Beauty-Quark Decays
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-EP-2021-042 LHCb-PAPER-2021-004 23 March 2021 Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays LHCb collaboration† Abstract The Standard Model of particle physics currently provides our best description of fundamental particles and their interactions. The theory predicts that the different charged leptons, the electron, muon and tau, have identical electroweak interaction strengths. Previous measurements have shown a wide range of particle decays are consistent with this principle of lepton universality. This article presents evidence for the breaking of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, with a significance of 3.1 standard deviations, based on proton-proton collision data collected with the LHCb detector at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. The measurements are of processes in which a beauty meson transforms into a strange meson with the emission of either an electron and a positron, or a muon and an antimuon. If confirmed by future measurements, this violation of lepton universality would imply physics beyond the Standard Model, such as a new fundamental interaction between quarks arXiv:2103.11769v1 [hep-ex] 22 Mar 2021 and leptons. Submitted to Nature Physics © 2021 CERN for the benefit of the LHCb collaboration. CC BY 4.0 licence. †Authors are listed at the end of this paper. ii The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics provides precise predictions for the properties and interactions of fundamental particles, which have been confirmed by numerous experiments since the inception of the model in the 1960's. However, it is clear that the model is incomplete. The SM is unable to explain cosmological observations of the dominance of matter over antimatter, the apparent dark-matter content of the Universe, or explain the patterns seen in the interaction strengths of the particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Feynman Diagrams Particle and Nuclear Physics
    5. Feynman Diagrams Particle and Nuclear Physics Dr. Tina Potter Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 1 In this section... Introduction to Feynman diagrams. Anatomy of Feynman diagrams. Allowed vertices. General rules Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 2 Feynman Diagrams The results of calculations based on a single process in Time-Ordered Perturbation Theory (sometimes called old-fashioned, OFPT) depend on the reference frame. Richard Feynman 1965 Nobel Prize The sum of all time orderings is frame independent and provides the basis for our relativistic theory of Quantum Mechanics. A Feynman diagram represents the sum of all time orderings + = −−!time −−!time −−!time Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 3 Feynman Diagrams Each Feynman diagram represents a term in the perturbation theory expansion of the matrix element for an interaction. Normally, a full matrix element contains an infinite number of Feynman diagrams. Total amplitude Mfi = M1 + M2 + M3 + ::: 2 Total rateΓ fi = 2πjM1 + M2 + M3 + :::j ρ(E) Fermi's Golden Rule But each vertex gives a factor of g, so if g is small (i.e. the perturbation is small) only need the first few. (Lowest order = fewest vertices possible) 2 4 g g g 6 p e2 1 Example: QED g = e = 4πα ∼ 0:30, α = 4π ∼ 137 Dr. Tina Potter 5. Feynman Diagrams 4 Feynman Diagrams Perturbation Theory Calculating Matrix Elements from Perturbation Theory from first principles is cumbersome { so we dont usually use it. Need to do time-ordered sums of (on mass shell) particles whose production and decay does not conserve energy and momentum. Feynman Diagrams Represent the maths of Perturbation Theory with Feynman Diagrams in a very simple way (to arbitrary order, if couplings are small enough).
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the B+ to J/Psi Lambda-Bar P Decay in Proton-Proton Collisions At
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-EP-2019-128 2019/12/23 CMS-BPH-18-005 + Study of the B ! J/yLpp decay in proton-proton collisions at s = 8 TeV The CMS Collaboration∗ Abstract + A studyp of the B ! J/yLp decay using proton-proton collision data collected at s = 8 TeV by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an in- tegrated luminosity of 19.6 fb−1, is presented. The ratio of branching fractions ∗ B(B+ ! J/yLp)/B(B+ ! J/yK (892)+) is measured to be (1.054 ± 0.057 (stat) ± 0.035 (syst) ± 0.011(B))%, where the last uncertainty reflects the uncertainties in the ∗ world-average branching fractions of L and K (892)+ decays to reconstructed final states. The invariant mass distributions of the J/yL, J/yp, and Lp systems produced in the B+ ! J/yLp decay are investigated and found to be inconsistent with the pure phase space hypothesis. The analysis is extended by using a model-independent an- gular amplitude analysis, which shows that the observed invariant mass distributions are consistent with the contributions from excited kaons decaying to the Lp system. ”Published in the Journal of High Energy Physics as doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)100.” arXiv:1907.05461v2 [hep-ex] 19 Dec 2019 c 2019 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration. CC-BY-4.0 license ∗See Appendix A for the list of collaboration members 1 1 Introduction The B+ ! J/yLp decay is the first observed example of a B meson decay into baryons and a charmonium state (the charge-conjugate states are implied throughout the paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Metastable Pions in Dense Media
    Metastable pions in dense media Marcelo Loewe1;2;3, Alfredo Raya4, Cristi´anVillavicencio5 1Instituto de F´ısica, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile 2Centre for Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, and Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa 3Centro Cient´ıfico Tecnol´ogico de Valpara´ıso { CCTVAL, Universidad T´ecnica Federico Santa Mar´ıa, Casilla 110-V, Valpara´ıso, Chile 4Instituto de F´ısica y Matem´aticas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicol´asde Hidalgo, Edificio C-3, Ciudad Universitaria, C.P. 58040, Morelia, Michoac´an,Mexico 5Departamento de Ciencias B´asicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del B´ıo-B´ıo, Casilla 447, Chill´an,Chile. We study the leptonic decay of charged pions in a compact star environment. Considering leptons as a degenerated Fermi system, pions are tightly constrained to decay into these particles because their Fermi levels are occupied. Thus, pion decay is only possible through thermal fluctuations. Under these circumstances, pion lifetime is larger and hence can be considered to reach a metastable state. We explore restrictions under which such a metastability is possible. We also study conditions under which pions and leptons already in chemical equilibrium can reach simultaneously the thermal equilibrium, and obtain the neutrino emissivity from metastable pions. Scenarios that favor this metastable state are protoneutron stars. I. INTRODUCTION tron stars, where temperature reaches values higher than 1 MeV (∼ 1010 K). Improvements on the study of pions in The study of pions in a condensed state has widely hot and dense media in heavy ion collision experiments at moderate energies have been conducted, showing an im- been explored in different contexts and frameworks [1{ − + 17].
    [Show full text]