Santa Clara Journal of International Law Volume 14 | Issue 2 Article 9 5-23-2016 Shaky Ground: How Wavering Approaches to Prostitution Law Have Undermined International Efforts to End It Tamarah Provost Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Tamarah Provost, Comment, Shaky Ground: How Wavering Approaches to Prostitution Law Have Undermined International Efforts to End It, 14 Santa Clara J. Int'l L. 615 (2016). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/scujil/vol14/iss2/9 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Shaky Ground: How Wavering Approaches to Prostitution Law Have Undermined International Efforts to End It Shaky Ground: How Wavering Approaches to Prostitution Law Have Undermined International Efforts to End It Tamarah Prevost 615 14 SANTA CLARA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 615 (2016) I. Introduction The central question for prostitution reform was identified by human rights activist Shelagh Day as, “what will help women, particularly poor, racialized women, escape the violence of prostitution?”1 Starting with this population seems logical within a goal of protecting human rights of all women, which is prioritized under various international covenants. If one starts with protecting the women that are at the highest risk of violence, presumably all women will benefit from this increased safety.