DOCSLIB.ORG

Tactics in the Franco.Prussian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

32 TACTICSIN THEFRANCO.PRUSSIAN WAR FROMOPENING SHOTS TO TIIE BATTTEOF SEDAN By Mikelohnson "shell" INTRODUCTION 3. French wasonlyeffectiveat certainpre-set ranges. 4. TheFrench Mitrailleuse was not aslethal as expected due to Although an in€reasingnumber of books are coming forward thes€arcity of mentrained to operateand service the weapon regarding the €ampaignsand battles of the Franco-Prussian and its very narrow coneof fire. War, and thereare now someexcellent sets of rulescoverins this fascinaringconflicr. whose duthors clearly have an insighi Iwould alsolike to makeafew pointson the diagramswhich into thisperiod,I find that neithersource of informationseems youwill find in thesearticlesl to dealconcisely with tacticsused and formarionsadopted by 1nThe diagmmsmainly depict infantry formations. I havenor "clutteredthem bothsides. up" withcavalryandtoo many artillery units In my opinion this is why the period, althoughenjoying asthe roleofthese latter arms is best explained in the textas popularitya few yearsago fuelled by the releaseof some a supplementto the diagrams. astoundingranges of figuresnotably in 15and 25mm (and now 2. The essentialinfantry fighting unit on borh sideswas the in 10mn),has never really broken intothe NineteenthCentury "big battalion.In realitymany more battalions would participare Period's league"which is dominatedby Napoleonicsand in the eflgagementthan the diagramswould suggest, but as ACW. All the other ingredientsare there spectacular wargamingis all aboutrecreating history in miniatwe- in uniforms,battles with momentsof dramaand pivotal tension, organisationalas well as visualscale - by deployingyour andweaponsofdauntinglethality. Without an understandingof 15mmor 25mmbattalions as depicred in th€ diagramsyou "feel" tacticsand formationsthose lovinglypainted armies are all will €apturethe of thesedesperate battl€s in the dressedupwithnowhere togo, andleft tolanguishonthe shelf "ForSale" Imperialphase of thewar. Ifyou fightin 6or 2mm(ye gods!) or edgeever nearer to the columnofthis masazine. youcan pour in morebattalions, but stillfollow the batralion ln theseanicles I hopeto changeall rhatl leveltactics. Suffice it to say that researchedrules will reflect the You will seethat in the text and in the diagams,I referto developmentsin weapontechnology in thisperiod, the salient "Prussia" "Prussians". onesofwhich can be summarisedas follows: and Thisis becausethewaris DoDularlv knownlrn thi\ countD at leasr)as the Franco-Prus:ran War. In l The FrenchChassepot rifle in the mainoutranged those of fact, as a quick perusalof any Order oI Battle will show,a theirGerman counterpa(s. considemblenumber of troopsfrom Prussia'sGerman Allies 2. The German Krupps artillery outrangedand was more (forexanple "shell" Bavaria)fought alongside rhe Prussians and their effectivethan Frenchartillery, mainlydue ro the organisationchiefly followed by the Prussianpattem. So, for rounds being fitted with percussionfuses, leading to Prussia.read "Prussia andher cermanAlies". explosionon impactat allranges. Enoughof the preliminaries,to battle . PART1: FRENCH TACTICAL DOCTRINE "furia 1. INFANTRYTACTICS circumstancesof battledid not warant a francese"sryle ot attack.rhen orher radics would be implemenleda\ ihe Until 1869French infantry tactics had been steeped in the vatue Commanderthought f'r. ideally(o crearethe circumsrances of offensiveaction, relying heavilyon French6lan and the where such an attack would meet with success.In shorr, inesistiblemomenrum of the bayonetcharge - tacticswhich dynamism venatility. "fuia ' and came to be known as francese (French Fury). These And then camethe 1869Drillbook. In 1867(in the lishr of werethe tacticswhich had beenadopted in the Crimeaand Pru\sia\crulhing deteat ot Ausrnain a mere6 seek\rh; year morerecently in Austriaand Italy. Refarring to DiagrarnA1, an before) Committeeswere establishedby NapoleonIII to attack " would commencewith a probe by a thin screenof re-evaluatethe tacticsof futia francese". mey h^d ro examine skirnishers(typically Chasseurs a Pi€d if theywere available, if just howsuccessful such tactics would be when pitted aAainst a not Zouavesor Tirailleu^ Algeriens- the dreadedTurcos) modern(and recenrlyvicrorioust army equippad *irh breech- designedto draw fire on themselvesand protectrhe massed loadingartillery and brcechloading rifles. The reportsofthese tbrmationsmoving up behindthem. These skirmishenwere to c-ommitteeswere not unanimousin their recommendations. thin out the enemyranks, and wefe certainlynot to be€ome Although the t^ctics of futia tancese" still enjoyed nuch boggeddown.in long rangefiring. Forwardmotion was all. suppon(especially in the rank and file and junior NCO'Sof Behind them the battalionswould be advancingdeployed, France'slmperial amy, as well as among those in high wherethe gound permitted,altemately in Iineand in column. command)there was a movementtowards adopting a more Whenthe columnswere within charging distance (see Diagram defensiveposture. It has to be saidthat rhe resultof all the A2) the skirmishline would part like a curtain,allowint the reports,counter-reports and obseNationswas inconclusive. lt column,lo chargeforqard. supporredb) rhevo eysof rheir wasnot until 1869that a new infantryDrillbook appeared. It comradesin line who would rhen advanceeeneraltv to waslhe worst of all worlds,neither reinstating the racticsof "furia consohdarethe gainedground. The columns.tayonets 6iea tancese", nor comprehensively adopting the new andsometimes in echelon,would sweep all beforethem. The defensivetactics.In hindsight, j ust when France needed a clear tactr€was not universallysuccessfut, but wasideally suited to statementof tacticaldoctrine, there wasconfusion. The damase thefrench lemperament wdsdone, and Francewenr ro war qirh her confidencein rie Another hallmarkof Frenchtactical doctdne prior to the bayonetcharge severely shaken. oulbrealo[ lhe Franco-Pru!:idnWar wd, fiexibitiry.It rhe The operingengagement of the War - the Frenchatrack at "A ": Flg, t Fu.laFrance8e ffi KEEPWARGAMING t Dirscuonol FrsnchAltack ffi PaulandTeresaBailey Fffie TheKe€p I ffiE& LeMarchant Barracks, London Road, tt "*'1:i'#l':i;!"d.1!l3A'Ju' ttatall, ffiffi W.3h.ll b€.r th.lollowing 3|jos in rlr. ndrftnlE: - Leionary,kmourh E nourh Coll€re,GiDry lan. 10th/1ilhS€Dlomb.r C.lou6,n@dins l3r2ndocrohsrF&f,tfr!ii'0.*n,0,*.o, Asomblv Rom. -l-l-l- stMnh frober Shmlsh, Chipp€nhan 16rhOclob€r SElwG, cwd.l P3l.€, London w..c n& edino HasM ol.d'c rcr4.trorrnh tuiim'i Mfthbd, ^llfir; 8d.ll e Plo@ n@ d-h*. nddardod E*ilroim ou' 'rno€dsrodifiidhiGin obt iFins Hrcuon.otafl endtthMwrwnorviciou'.hoDo' u*odma'lotd.'sdiotOur "A2": dixri ao ano.qdrh€ mocqtmDBhonli6 'n rh. bu.ih* Fq tulld@ilt $ndtn Flg, FurlaFranc6e s-A"E.or2Fc5@rho!bdr.dd'4ddins,ilFosiblayout'aorhffi u.'*.*,n"*, ^,'r'##Hoi ?5mm6na6&8arPanha H.rch3 & F@ FiouG t Rund*.y Mi.iaM6 - r[ nouE 6ns6 Dixon!Minirto6-All 15mm&25FFEns6.MLR-!.rd.d E^gd t t Tdton,D*6- sldod Enq6. N.fu t'h.tc|(nt Mll.hborshid6; Aitf! nd.ll; tujimi f, Hee!.wr' Vrdc Wr DalmeiL'i6: w!r F.atuB Filmt€lq I T cdrdG.ntRul- TurnReaEhsytuh{Dftidnouohlel.l Enshihc6mpd€rw.tlahe. s;r.af,ub waElm6 R.*rch GouD: Trbl@o G!m6: Nsbury 3ul.r: i (}6D';M.ndramq Elia;V.^su.td&Gnp6i0ns.riE: Fa'ft r; olua$lededrid6lromm.nydh.rDubli$e6. Tdln & Mod.lalndhF K&MT@: Hddclcinlj M!inlvMilibrylcinl, rn.Drum(6i^): "ilna HrddorD6ionl@'dl:D6ts'Modalcll5mm tpol@nicardb{ildinss) Saarbrucken - saw the French using the favoured fiatcese" tacti6, but ftankly as the French attacked in such overwhelming numbers, almost any tactical formation *ould still haveresulted in a Frenchvictory. However, the subsequent en, where time allowed the French infanfy adopted the batdes of those fateful days of August 1870and the Battle of defensive tactics (notably at Spicheren and Froeschwiler), Sedanat the beginning of Sept€mberbore witnessto the fact though when hard-pressedthey simply had to cope with the tlat the defensive tactics had become prcmineot in French Fig. "Bl " r French "Defemlve" military thinldng, and had become"the official line". So let us tak€ a €loser look at these defensivetactics. They En€myAilack stressedtbe desirability of solid defensive positions giving a good field of fire for the French Chassepot rifles. Such "positio6 magnifiques" t}?ic.aly comprised ridges, hills and prominent spuis, upon the top and facing slopesof which the French infantry would be lessdensely d€ploy€d than before, \Z lying prone in line fomation. Where time allowed, shelter ..laaaa5ri. trenches(mercly "scrape$') and other rudimentary earthworks were prepar€d. Vilages and walled farms were swiftly trans- e formed into loopholed bastionsto form strongholdsin the line of defence. Woods and vineyardstoo would be defended.As can be seenfrom Diagram 81, behind this solid line and on the revers€slope the r€serveswould be formed up in clos€column. How€ver, in front of this seeminglyimpregnable line would be Key: swarmsof skirnishers (again, Chasseursa Pied, Zouaves and nnirety 'Jful,afdncrs€" fiifiEiffi* Turco6,but in grcater numbersthan the tactics) "82": "Delenslve" using cover wherever possible and picking off enemy gunners Fig. French and infantry The whole idea was that the enemywould break itself by attempting to storm such a position, and would then (seeDiagam 82) be ddven off by a counter-attackcomprised of open oder formations screenedby skirmishersor, i{ the enemy werc sufficiently d€moralised, by deep columns (as Diagram 82 shows).To the detriment of the Frcnch, in practice suchcount€r-attacks
Recommended publications
  • Musket Demonstration

    Musket Demonstration

    Program Bulletin- Musket Firing Program Overview This program focuses on the weapons carried by British soldiers at Michilimackinac, and how they were employed in daily garrison routines. It includes a demonstration of the manual exercise and firings necessary to operate the musket and provide accurate, concentrated firepower. The Musket The musket carried by interpreters is a reproduction of the New Pattern of Short Land Musket for Line Infantry, otherwise known as the Short Land Pattern Musket. It was introduced for British infantry service in 1769, and represents another variant in a series of flintlock muskets used by the British beginning in the 1720s. The weapon has a .75 caliber barrel, meaning that it is three quarters of an inch in diameter. The barrel is smooth-bored, meaning that the interior is smooth. It lacks the rifled grooves of most modern weapons, which impart a spin on the projectile as it travels down the barrel. The musket relies upon a flintlock mechanism to fire. The lock contains two primary exterior parts: the cock, which includes a piece of flint screwed into a set of jaws, and the hammer, which is a smooth piece of steel mounted on a hinge. To load the musket, a small quantity of gunpowder is poured onto a pan or tray just below the hammer, which swings down to lock the powder in place. When the trigger is pulled, the cock flies forward, forcing the flint to strike the steel of the hammer, which is swung open. The sparks generated by the flint and steel should fall on the gunpowder in the pan, which will burn through a touchhole bored in the side of the barrel and ignite the rest of the powder inside to propel the musket ball out of the barrel.
  • The Fusilier Origins in Tower Hamlets the Tower Was the Seat of Royal

    The Fusilier Origins in Tower Hamlets the Tower Was the Seat of Royal

    The Fusilier Origins in Tower Hamlets The Tower was the seat of Royal power, in addition to being the Sovereign’s oldest palace, it was the holding prison for competitors and threats, and the custodian of the Sovereign’s monopoly of armed force until the consolidation of the Royal Arsenal at Woolwich in 1805. As such, the Tower Hamlets’ traditional provision of its citizens as a loyal garrison to the Tower was strategically significant, as its possession and protection influenced national history. Possession of the Tower conserved a foothold in the capital, even for a sovereign who had lost control of the City or Westminster. As such, the loyalty of the Constable and his garrison throughout the medieval, Tudor and Stuart eras was critical to a sovereign’s (and from 1642 to 1660, Parliament’s) power-base. The ancient Ossulstone Hundred of the County of Middlesex was that bordering the City to the north and east. With the expansion of the City in the later Medieval period, Ossulstone was divided into four divisions; the Tower Division, also known as Tower Hamlets. The Tower Hamlets were the military jurisdiction of the Constable of the Tower, separate from the lieutenancy powers of the remainder of Middlesex. Accordingly, the Tower Hamlets were sometimes referred to as a county-within-a-county. The Constable, with the ex- officio appointment of Lord Lieutenant of Tower Hamlets, held the right to call upon citizens of the Tower Hamlets to fulfil garrison guard duty at the Tower. Early references of the unique responsibility of the Tower Hamlets during the reign of Bloody Mary show that in 1554 the Privy Council ordered Sir Richard Southwell and Sir Arthur Darcye to muster the men of the Tower Hamlets "whiche owe their service to the Towre, and to give commaundement that they may be in aredynes for the defence of the same”1.
  • Prussian Line Infantry 1866 a Painting Guide

    Prussian Line Infantry 1866 a Painting Guide

    Prussian Line Infantry 1866 A Painting Guide ORGANISATION , T ACTICS & WEAPONRY These notes are intended to act as a guide when painting a range of 25 mm Prussian Line Infantry. The Prussian Line Infantry performed extremely well during the campaign, surprising contemporary commentators with their élan and skill. The intensive peacetime training all recruits received, with an emphasis on shooting practice and advanced tactical manoeuvres had a beneficial effect on their battlefield performance. The army was recruited by universal conscription, which caused the rank and file to possess above average levels of literacy and initiative. The infantry regiment consisted of three battalions, although on the battlefields of 1866 the half-battalion was frequently the unit of manoeuvre. Each battalion consisted of 18 officers, two surgeons, one paymaster, one quartermaster and 1002 NCOs and privates. The standard battlefield formation, the half-battalion, manoeuvring in two 10 deep company columns. Strong screens of skirmishes were pushed out ahead of the main body of the unit. During 1866 the company columns were often used to feed troops into the skirmish line. The formation was notable for its flexibility and rapidity across the battlefield, although it could become entangled with neighbouring formations. The men were armed with the famous Dreyse breech-loading ‘needle gun’. This had a devastating rapidity of fire -five aimed or eight unaimed rounds per minute. Its drawback was a low muzzle velocity, which caused it to have a relatively short range of about 500 yards. It was lethal at between 135 and 250 yards. At distances beyond 450 yards men could be hit several times and be unfortunate to sustain more than a bruise.
  • SUPPLEMENT to the LONDON GAZETTE, I MARCH, 1945

    SUPPLEMENT to the LONDON GAZETTE, I MARCH, 1945

    Il82 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, i MARCH, 1945 No..' 6100031 (Lance-Sergeant Eric Francis Aubrey No. 6977405 Private Thomas Dawson, The King's Upperton, The Green Howards (Alexandra, Own Scottish Borderers (Kells, Co. Meath). Princess of Wales's Own Yorkshire Regiment) No. 14244985 Private (acting Corporal) Mathew (High Wycombe). Lawrence Morgan, The Cameromans (Scottish No. 14655457 Lance-Corporal John Wilks, The Green Rifles). Howards (Alexandra, Princess of Wales's Own No. 5182405 Corporal (acting Sergeant) Albert Victor Yorkshire Regiment) (Scunthorpe). Walker, The Gloucestershire Regiment (Water- No. 58189820 Private Harold Gmntham Birch, The moore, Glos). Green Howards (Alexandra, Princess of Wales's No. 5258245 Sergeant John Isaac Gue'st, The Own Yorkshire Regiment). Worcestershire Regiment (Worcester). No. 144274180 Private James Alfred Reddington, No. 4982401 Sergeant William Francis Jennings, The The Green Howards (Alexandra, 'Princess of Worcestershire Regiment (London, £.14). Wales's Own Yorkshire Regiment) (Deal). No. 5257827 Lance-Corporal Alfred Henry Palmer, No. 5388512 Private Frederick James Riddle, The The Worcestershire Regiment (Redditch). Green Howards (Alexandra, Princess of Wales's No. 5257681 Private George Bromwich, The ' Own "Yorkshire Regiment) (ChaMont-St.-Giles). Worcestershire Regiment (Rugby). No. 3772811 Sergeant George Bannerman, The Royal No. 5436899 Private Reginald Lugg, The Worcester- Scots Fusiliers (Nottingham). shire Regiment (Reading). No. 3125986 Sergeant Albert Shires, The Royal No. 14419045 Private Arthur Edwin Stacey, The Scots Fusiliers (iHartlepool). Worcestershire Regiment (Shaftesbury). No. 3775276 Corporal (acting Sergeant) William No. 3380*595 Warrant Officer Class I Ernest William Beagan, The Royal Scots Fusiliers (Liverpool 4). Churchill, The East Lancashire Regiment No. 3134048 Corporal (acting Sergeant) William John (tAlnwick).
  • Failure in 1813: the Decline of French Light Infantry and Its Effect on Napoleon’S German Campaign

    Failure in 1813: the Decline of French Light Infantry and Its Effect on Napoleon’S German Campaign

    United States Military Academy USMA Digital Commons Cadet Senior Theses in History Department of History Spring 4-14-2018 Failure in 1813: The eclineD of French Light Infantry and its effect on Napoleon's German Campaign Gustave Doll United States Military Academy, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usmalibrary.org/history_cadet_etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Doll, Gustave, "Failure in 1813: The eD cline of French Light Infantry and its effect on Napoleon's German Campaign" (2018). Cadet Senior Theses in History. 1. https://digitalcommons.usmalibrary.org/history_cadet_etd/1 This Bachelor's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at USMA Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cadet Senior Theses in History by an authorized administrator of USMA Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United States Military Academy USMA Digital Commons Cadet Senior Theses in History Department of History Spring 4-14-2018 Failure in 1813: The eclineD of French Light Infantry and its effect on Napoleon's German Campaign Gustave Doll Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usmalibrary.org/history_cadet_etd UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY FAILURE IN 1813: THE DECLINE OF FRENCH LIGHT INFANTRY AND ITS EFFECT ON NAPOLEON’S GERMAN CAMPAIGN HI499: SENIOR THESIS SECTION S26 CPT VILLANUEVA BY CADET GUSTAVE A DOLL, ’18 CO F3 WEST POINT, NEW YORK 19 APRIL 2018 ___ MY DOCUMENTATION IDENTIFIES ALL SOURCES USED AND ASSISTANCE RECEIVED IN COMPLETING THIS ASSIGNMENT. ___ NO SOURCES WERE USED OR ASSISTANCE RECEIVED IN COMPLETING THIS ASSIGNMENT.
  • 1Jock Haswell, the British Army: a Concise History (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975), 9- 10

    1Jock Haswell, the British Army: a Concise History (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975), 9- 10

    CHAPTER 3 THE SOLDIERS: THE BRITISH FORCES The British forces that fought against the Jacobite forces during the rebellions were essentially two different and diametrically opposed armies. Although armed and initially trained the same, the two forces were very different. The first force to fight in the rebellions was the militia, and the second was made up of the Regulars in the British Standing Army. The former was trained yet untested and out of practice; while the latter was brimming with experienced veterans from continental warfare. This chapter will begin with a brief history of the standing army in Britain which will explain the existence of the militia; then it will explore the weapons and tactics of the British forces which fought against the Highland Charge. The British land forces had their beginnings in the eleventh century A.D. when the Normans brought the feudal system to England. Under this system, the Anglo-Saxon fyrd developed. The fyrd was a local military force composed of all free landowners between the ages of sixteen and sixty who served approximately two months per year and who could be called upon for defense at a moments notice. King Alfred, who reigned in southern England from 871 to 899, divided the country into military districts and required landowners who owned a specified amount of land to arm themselves.1 This was the beginning of the English militia, which was relied upon for the defense of the home front for the next eight centuries. The militia units were called upon during the threat of invasions, internal insurrections, and for service in Ireland.2 For the large-scale wars during the Middle Ages however, armies were raised for the campaigns or the duration of 1Jock Haswell, The British Army: A Concise History (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975), 9- 10.
  • 282 Index Index Index

    282 Index Index Index

    282 Index Index Index Aéronautique militaire 199-200 Cavalry Corps 57, 70, 91, 93-102, 119-120, Abwehr 166 133, 138, 149, 162, 174, 183, 187, 191, 193, 203, Action Nationale 37 208, 220-221, 225-226, 236, 240, 242-244, Activists 26, 28, 30, 35 247, 260, 269 Albert Canal 5, 58, 83, 92, 117, 139, 150, 184, coverage and service time 103-110 193-197, 208, 211, 215-217, 219, 226, 240, deployment controversies 19-22 242-243, 252, 259, 265, 267, 270-271 and Depression 67-69 Albert I, King of the Belgians 1, 8, 20-24, 28- divisions 22-24, 55-58, 60, 63, 66, 78-79, 82- 29, 33, 38, 52-54, 62, 71, 75, 80-83, 141-142, 83, 85, 90-92, 94, 96, 99-100, 102-103, 106, 172, 180, 208, 213, 229, 256-257, 265 108, 117, 129-130, 132, 134, 138-142, 144, 146, Allied First Army Group 1, 241, 244-245 149, 151, 156, 158, 160-161, 163-164, 174, 187, Allied (Great) Powers 12, 35, 36, 41, 109, 190-191, 193-194, 202-203, 205, 208, 217, 112-114 220-222, 226-227, 229-230, 236, 239-241, Allies 1-2, 5, 10, 24-25, 33, 35-36, 60, 70, 84, 243, 246-248, 251-253, 256, 258-260, 269- 87, 96, 110, 112, 116, 135-136, 141, 150, 165, 270 180-182, 185, 188-190, 192, 194, 196, 198, 201, 1st Cavalry Division 100, 236 208, 210, 213-217, 220, 225, 228-230, 232- 2nd Cavalry Division 100, 236 233, 235, 238-239, 242-249, 252, 254-255, 2nd Infantry Division 66,158, 202 259, 262-263, 265, 267, 271-272 3rd Infantry Division 161, 205 Anschluss 190 4th Infantry Division 161, 226, 229, 243, anti-Semitism 166 252 Antwerp (see also PFA) 3, 15-16, 19-23, 25, 30, 5th Infantry Dvision 160, 222 32, 35,
  • The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers

    The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers

    The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers (5th, 6th, 7th, 20th) The Regimental Handbook Customs and Practices of The Regiment 8th Edition 2019 REGIMENTAL HANDBOOK CONTENTS Foreword 8 Preface to the Eighth Edition 9 CHAPTER 1 Historical Background 10 CHAPTER 2 Titles 14 Para 2.1 The Title of the Regiment 2.2 The Short Title of the Regiment 2.3-2.4 The Battalion Titles 2.5 The Company Titles 2.6 Regimental Regular Bands 2.7-2.8 The Reserves Band Titles 2.9 HQ The Queen’s Division Annex A Formation of the Regiment CHAPTER 3 The Structure of the Regiment 18 Para 3.1 The Colonel-in-Chief 3.2 The Colonel of the Regiment 3.3 The Area Colonels 3.4 The Honorary Colonels 3.5 The Regimental Council 3.6 The Regimental Council Meeting 3.7 The Regimental Sub Committees 3.8-3.9 Control and Management 3.10 Honorary Appointments 3.11 Responsibilities of Regimental Headquarters 3.12 Responsibilities of Area Headquarters North and South 3.13 Precedence of Areas CHAPTER 4 The Colours 22 Para 4.1- 4.2 Background 4.3 The Queen’s Colour 4.4 The Regimental Colour 4.5 The Presentation of Colours 4.6 The Wilhelmstahl or Drummers’ Colour Annex A Description of the Colours Appendix 1 The ‘Drummer’s or Wilhelmstahl Colour’ Historical Note Annex B Details of the Presentation of Colours 3 REGIMENTAL HANDBOOK CHAPTER 5 Battle Honours 28 Para 5.1 Background 5.2 Regimental Battle Honours 5.3 Battle Honours Borne on the Colours of the Regiment 5.4 Battle Honours Borne on Regimental Accoutrements Annex A A Brief History B Battle Honours Borne on the
  • National Identity and the British Common Soldier Steven Schwamenfeld

    National Identity and the British Common Soldier Steven Schwamenfeld

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 "The Foundation of British Strength": National Identity and the British Common Soldier Steven Schwamenfeld Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ARTS AND SCIENCES “The Foundation of British Strength:” National Identity and the British Common Soldier By Steven Schwamenfeld A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Steven Schwamenfeld defended on Dec. 5, 2006. ___________________ Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Dissertation _____________ Patrick O’Sullivan Outside Committee Member _________________ Michael Cresswell Committee Member ________________ Edward Wynot Committee Member Approved: ___________________ Neil Jumonville, Chair History Department The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables iv Abstract v Introduction 1 I. “Thou likes the Smell of Poother” 13 II. “Our Poor Fellows” 42 III. “Hardened to my Lot” 63 IV. “…to Conciliate the Inhabitants” 92 V. Redcoats and Hessians 112 VI. The Jewel in the Crown of Thorns 135 VII. Soldiers, Settlers, Slaves and Savages 156 VIII. Conclusion 185 Appendix 193 Bibliography 199 Biographical Sketch 209 iii LIST OF
  • The 7Th Royal Fusiliers in the Crimean War with the Medal Roll 1854

    The 7Th Royal Fusiliers in the Crimean War with the Medal Roll 1854

    THE 7th ROYAL FUSILIERS IN THE CRIMEAN WAR With THE MEDAL ROLL (As far as could be confirmed) 1854 – 1856 Compiled By J P Kelleher 2013 1854: Nearly forty years had passed since the Royal Fusiliers saw active service, when Russia, seeking in her ambition to overwhelm Turkey, was arrested in her aggression by the united action of England and France. The two Powers declared war against the Czar on the 27th.March 1854, and the British force was sent to south-eastern Europe, under command of Lord Raglan- who as Lord Fitzroy Somerset had earned distinction under Wellington. The Royal Fusiliers, were amongst the first regiments ordered to be brought up to war strength. They were quartered at Manchester, and the North of England was their recruiting ground. During the early spring, the Regiment was raised to full establishment, and drilled into one of the smartest, and most solid battalions in the service. On Tuesday, the 4th.April 1854, the Royal Fusiliers: Headquarters and 8 companies; consisting of 3 Field officers, 8 Captains, 14 Lieutenants, 5 Staff, 46 Sergeants, 15 Drummers, 850 Rank and File, and 25 women – under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Walter Lacy Yea, entrained at Manchester for Southampton, where they embarked the same evening on board the transport „Orinoco‟. After touching at Gibralter and Malta, the transport disembarked her troops at Scutari, on the 22nd. Here the regiment was brigaded with the 23rd and 33rd. Foot, under Brigadier General Richard Airey. Airey‟s Brigade, with the 19th, 77th, 88th. and 2nd Rifle Brigade, formed the Light Division, commanded by Lord George Brown.
  • Military Speak

    Military Speak

    Military Speak A glossary for Soldiers and Chiefs Soldiers have a language of their own. Some of these words and phrases are technical descriptions of aspects of the military life. Others are slang or metaphors that have found their way into everyday speech. You might be using military terms without even realising it! As you explore the displays in the Soldiers and Chiefs exhibition, you might find some unfamiliar terms. This information booklet provides definitions for a number of military words, grouped into these categories: • Kinds of Soldiers • Army Ranks • Army Weapons 1 Kinds of Soldiers This set of military terms for different kinds of soldiers will help you to become familiar with the terminology used in the exhibitions. Some of these terms are no longer used in today’s armies. Civilian a non-military person: a soldier’s life starts as a civilian Soldier a soldier serves in an army, wearing a uniform and carrying a weapon Infantry soldiers who are trained to fight on foot Civilianin the past, included such types as fusilier, grenadier and rifleman Cavalry soldiers who were trained to fight on horseback the common types of cavalry were hussar, lancer and dragoon Artilleryman a soldier with specialized training to operate artillery (cannons) a term used since the 16th century Rifleman an infantry soldier trained to use an accurate weapon (a rifle) and to operate in small groups to harass the enemy a term used since the 18th century Hussar Specialist Soldiers of the 18th and 19th Centuries Hussar (pronounced ‘who’s-are’) an elaborately
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 16 December, 1943 5473

    Supplement to the London Gazette, 16 December, 1943 5473

    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 16 DECEMBER, 1943 5473 Major (temporary Lieutenant-Colonel) John Arundel Lieutenant (temporary Captain) George Power Carne Theobalds (17689), The Oxfordshire and Bucking- (ABRO 57), Army in Burma Reserve of Officers hamshire Light Infantry (Fleet, Hants). (attd. The Burma Rifles). Major (temporary Lieutenant-Colonel) Gordon Robert Lieutenant (temporary Captain) John Coleridge Marshall (135685), Royal Army Medical Corps Fraser {AERO 74), Army in Burma Reserve of (Chester). Officers (attd. The Burma Rifles). a Brigadier (temporary) Arthur Verney Hammond, Lieutenant (temporary Captain) William Douglas Indian Army. Griffiths (ABRO 83), Army in Burma Reserve of Colonel (local) Francis William Haswell, Indian Army Officers (attd. The Burma Rifles). (attd. Btirma Frontier Force). Lieutenant (temporary Captain) Patrick Reginald Captain John Stephen Lanchester O'Neill, i5th Maddox (ABRO 458), Army in Burma Reserve of Punjab Regiment, Indian Army. Officers. Major (temporary Lieutenant-Colonel) Lyndon Grier Lieutenant (temporary Captain) Oliver Montague Wheeler (182.A), A Punjab Regiment, Indian Army Beauchamp Milton (ABRO 131), Army in Burma (attd. The Burma Rifles) (since killed in action) Reserve of Officers (attd. Burma Army Service (to be dated 3rd April, 1943). Corps). Lieutenant (acting Captain) Peter Robert Sandham The Military Cross. Bankes (ABRO 367), Army in Burma Reserve of Officers (attd. Western Chin Levies). Captain (temporary Major) Alfred McEwen Window Lieutenant David Thomas James, Army in Burma (16289), Royal Regiment of Artillery (London, Reserve of Officers (attd. Chin Hills Levies). S.E.iS). Lieutenant Saw Chit Kyin (ABRO 595), Army in Captain Arthur Ivor Stewart-Liberty (68665), Royal Burma Reserve of Officers (attd. The Burma Regiment of Artillery.