DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 28 Revolutions and National States in the Atlantic World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 28 Revolutions and National States in the Atlantic World Chapter 28 Revolutions and National States in the Atlantic World THE CHAPTER IN PERSPECTIVE Revolutions shook the Atlantic world in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, bringing unprecedented political and social changes. The American Revolution brought independence from Great Britain and the creation of a new republic. Shortly thereafter a revolution broke out that radically transformed French society and shook Europe to its core. Central and South America, including the Caribbean, would undergo similar transformations. These revolutions spread Enlightenment ideals and promoted the consolidation of national states. OVERVIEW Popular Sovereignty and Political Upheaval Obviously, much of the intellectual foundation for this revolutionary age relates back directly to Enlightenment thinkers. Enlightenment ideals such as popular sovereignty, individual freedom, political and legal equality, and the social contract formed the core of the philosophy of these revolutionary thinkers. The American Revolution proved a natural, although at the time surprising, expression of these concepts. The overwhelming victory in the Seven Years’ War pushed the British ahead in the race for world hegemony, but it also increased tension with their North American colonies. Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence mirrored the influence of Enlightenment thinkers such as Locke as well as the growing colonial dissatisfaction with the nature of their constitutional relationship to England. The colonial victory in the resulting war—due to a combination of American grit, British indecisiveness, and French aid—stood as an example for other thinkers dreaming of a new world. The French were inspired by the American example but also pushed to carry out change on a much more profound and radical level. The French Revolution attempted to transform every aspect of the ancien régime. As expressed in the ideals of The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, the National Assembly strove to ensure popular sovereignty, the equality of all individuals, and the sanctity of individual rights. Eventually, as is so often the case in revolutions, the French Revolution took a more radical turn that left many of its original and more moderate proponents mystified. The Convention declared France a republic, established the levée en masse, and eventually executed Louis XVI. Maximilien Robespierre’s establishment of the “cult of reason” would be the most radical phase of the revolution. The Directory marked a turn back toward a more moderate, if politically indecisive, direction. Napoleon Bonaparte’s usurpation of power brought the revolution almost full circle. A complicated figure, Napoleon stands somewhere between reformer and dictator. At the height of his power Napoleon controlled most of continental Europe. The disastrous Russian campaign of 1812 turned the tide on his glorious career, and he would eventually die in exile on St. Helena in 1821. The Influence of Revolution The inspiration for revolutionary change was not a European or North American monopoly. The uprising in Saint-Domingue would prove to be the only successful slave revolt in world history. What is more, the efforts of Boukman and especially Louverture in creating an independent Haiti brought about a level of social change even greater than that accomplished by their American or French counterparts. The other Latin American revolutionaries were concerned mainly with political independence and not as committed to social upheaval. Mainly, the creoles hoped to displace the peninsulares while maintaining their own privileged place in society. Leaders such as Augustín de Iturbide, Simón Bolívar, José de San Martín, and Bernardo O’Higgins carved off most of Latin America from European control. No revolution met the expectations of its early leaders, however. After failing to put together a powerful Latin American federation, Simón Bolívar complained that “those who have served the revolution have plowed the sea.” The revolutionary fervor also spawned new political philosophies. The English philosopher Edmund Burke, although a supporter of the colonial position in the American Revolution, decried the extremism of the French Revolution and became the chief early spokesman for conservatism. Liberalism grew from the writings of John Stuart Mill and others. A call for the end to the slave trade and even slavery itself attracted many followers during this period. In 1807 William Wilberforce pushed a bill through Parliament that ended the British slave trade. The British abolished slavery in 1833. Other countries followed suit on both measures. Political freedom and social equality for ex-slaves would be much more difficult to attain. Writers such as Mary Astell and Mary Wollstonecraft, through her A Vindication of the Rights of Women, championed the cause of women’s rights. Elizabeth Cady Stanton organized the Seneca Falls conference in 1848 and demanded rights equivalent to those of men. Once again though the goal of equality would prove elusive. The Consolidation of National States in Europe Despite all the revolutionary changes of these years, the development of nationalism may have cast the longest shadow. The first nationalist thinkers were proponents of what might be called cultural nationalism, which was a call for people to appreciate the unique cultural and intellectual achievements of a national community. Johann Gottfried von Herder’s discussion of Volksgeist was a classic example of this form of nationalism. These thinkers stressed examples of cultural accomplishment as a means of creating a sense of community, but they did not argue for superiority. Political nationalists pushed for loyalty and solidarity for their national group and argued for political independence and state-building. Examples of this type of nationalism would be Giuseppe Mazzini and his Young Italy movement, and Theodore Herzl and the rise of Zionism. The specter of rapid national independence was a frightening one for many European leaders. Prince Klemens von Metternich, presiding over the Congress of Vienna, attempted to suppress national consciousness and re-create the sense of balance that he equated with the ancien régime. The efforts of Cavour and Garibaldi brought the independence and unification of Italy. Otto von Bismarck, stressing the political reality of change through “blood and iron” rather than debate, unified Germany and permanently changed the European landscape. AP World History Name: ____________________________ Chapter 28 Study Questions Popular Sovereignty and Political Upheaval IDENTIFICATION: PEOPLE What is the contribution of each of the following individuals to world history? Identification should include answers to the questions who, what, where, when, how, and why is this person important? 1. Olympe de Gouges 2. John Lock 3. George Washington 4. Louis XVI 5. Marie Antoinette 6. Maximilien Robespierre 7. Napoleon Bonaparte IDENTIFICATION: TERMSICONCEPTS State in your own words what each of the following terms means and why it is significant to a study of world history. (Terms with an asterisk are defined in the glossary) 1. Declaration of Independence* 2. Ancien regime 3. National Assembly 4. Jacobins 5. Directory 6. Civil Code STUDY QUESTIONS 1. In what specific ways did the ideals of the Enlightenment challenge long-held assumptions about government and social order? 2. What specific issues and concerns led the British colonies of North America to revolt against their sovereign? What was the outcome of that rebellion? 3. In what specific ways did the ideals of the Enlightenment challenge long-held assumptions about government and social order? 4. What specific issues and concerns led the British colonies of North America to revolt against their sovereign? What was the outcome of that rebellion? 5. What were the principal causes of the French Revolution of 1789? Were these concerns addressed by the revolution? 6. How was French society restructured during the most radical phase of the Revolution (1793–94)? Were these permanent changes, or short-lived ones? 7. Conventional wisdom holds that Napoleon ended the revolution when he proclaimed himself emperor in 1804. In what ways did he continue the ideals of the revolution? In what ways did he reverse the revolution? AP World History Name: ____________________________ Chapter 28 Study Questions The Influence of the Revolution IDENTIFICATION: PEOPLE 1. Toussaint L'Ouverture 2. Simon Bolivar 3. Edmund Burke 4. John Stuart Mill IDENTIFICATION: TERMSICONCEPTS 1. Peninsulares 2. Conservatism 3. Liberalism STUDY QUESTIONS 1. What events led to the slave revolt of Saint-Domingue (Haiti)? Why was this rebellion successful when so many other slave revolts failed? 2. Describe the basic social structure of Latin American society in 1800. What factors led to the revolutions that followed? 3. What kind of states emerged in Mexico, Gran Colombia, and Brazil after the revolutions? 4. What factors led the western powers to abolish the slave trade and then slavery in the nineteenth century? 5. What was the impact of the ideals of the Enlightenment and the events of the revolutionary era on the status of women? Give some specific examples. AP World History Name: ____________________________ Chapter 29 Study Questions The Consolidation of National States in Europe IDENTIFICATION: PEOPLE 1. Klemens von Metternich 2. Otto von Bismarck IDENTIFICATION: TERMSICONCEPTS 1. Zionism 2. Congress of Vienna* .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H
    Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I New Direction MMXX CONTENTS Hannes H. Gissurarson is Professor of Politics at the University of Iceland and Director of Research at RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for Innovation and Economic Growth. The author of several books in Icelandic, English and Swedish, he has been on the governing boards of the Central Bank of Iceland and the Mont Pelerin Society and a Visiting Scholar at Stanford, UCLA, LUISS, George Mason and other universities. He holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and a B.A. and an M.A. in History and Philosophy from the University of Iceland. Introduction 7 Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) 13 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 35 John Locke (1632–1704) 57 David Hume (1711–1776) 83 Adam Smith (1723–1790) 103 Edmund Burke (1729–1797) 129 Founded by Margaret Thatcher in 2009 as the intellectual Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) 163 hub of European Conservatism, New Direction has established academic networks across Europe and research Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) 185 partnerships throughout the world. Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850) 215 Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) 243 Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) 281 New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. Registered Office: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium President: Tomasz Poręba MEP Executive Director: Witold de Chevilly Lord Acton (1834–1902) 313 The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Social Protection in Latin America and the Caribbean: Selected Texts 2006-2019
    Select pages of ECLAC Universal Social Protection in Latin America and the Caribbean Selected texts 2006-2019 Simone Cecchini (compiler) Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps SELECT PAGES OF ECLAC Select Pages of ECLAC is an innovative editorial collection from the Commission, in keeping with the new ways of disseminating and reading publications in the digital era. The titles included in this electronic collection are compilations of texts on the latest topics that make up the Organization’s main areas of work. The full versions of the original articles can be accessed through the links in the publication and in the final section “Documents included in this compilation”. Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Deputy Executive Secretary Raúl García-Buchaca Deputy Executive Secretary for Management and Programme Analysis Ricardo Pérez Chief, Publications and Web Services Division The selected texts in this volume are taken from institutional documents of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, ECLAC (annual reports and meeting and session documents) and books or documents produced by the following authors and editors: Laís Abramo, Alberto Arenas, Carla Bronzo, Simone Cecchini, Nuria Cunill-Grau, Fernando Filgueira, Carlos Maldonado, Rodrigo Martínez, Beatriz Morales, Fabián Repetto, Nieves Rico, Claudia Robles, Cecilia Rossel, Ana Sojo, Andras Uthoff and Mario Velásquez.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism in Europe
    Nationalism Do Now Explain your pride in your country? What would you do for your nation? Why? Learning Targets and Intentions of the Lesson 1. KNOW how Nationalism and Liberalism dominated the political landscape of the 19th Century. 2. UNDERSTAND and explain the contrasts between Realism and Romanticism. 3. Complete a guided reading and short response assignment on the significance of Nationalism (SKILLS). What is Liberalism? A political philosophy founded on the ideas of liberty and equality. Nineteenth-century liberalism was more than an economic and political theory: it was a way of viewing the world. Foundations of Liberalism are in Enlightenment ideas, English liberties, the principles of the Declaration of the Rights of Man Nationalism A nation – people joined together by the bonds of: common language, common customs, culture, and history, administered by the same government. Political and ethnic boundaries should coincide. What is Nationalism? Culture – History - shared way a common of life past Nationality – shared Language- shared ethnic Nationalism communication ancestry Religion- Territory shared by – land belongs to most group Positives –overthrow absolute rule, democratic governments Negatives – Forced assimilation of minority, extreme nationalism leads to dictatorship How did “nationalism” affect Europe in the 19th-century? Following the defeat of Napoleon, the Congress of Vienna met to create a peace settlement in Europe Battle of Waterloo The Congress’s purpose was to establish a balance of power in Europe and return monarchs to power. Prince Klemens von Metternich Congress of Vienna (1814 – 1815) But, the French Revolution had inspired the rise of nationalistic movements in many European countries. Nationalism is the loyalty of a people to their values, traditions, geography…their Country Nationalistic Movements: The unification of Germany was led by Otto von Bismarck.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right
    Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Political Science | Volume 71 Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US With kind support of Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No- Derivatives 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non-commer- cial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative of the original work and for com- mercial use, further permission is required and can be obtained by contacting [email protected] Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs, figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further permission may be required from the rights holder. The obligation to research and clear permission lies solely with the party re-using the material. © 2019 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld Cover layout: Kordula Röckenhaus, Bielefeld Typeset by Alexander Masch, Bielefeld Printed by Majuskel Medienproduktion GmbH, Wetzlar Print-ISBN 978-3-8376-4670-2 PDF-ISBN 978-3-8394-4670-6 https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446706 Contents Introduction | 7 Stephen Albrecht, Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston ANALYZING Understanding the Alt-Right.
    [Show full text]
  • Bismarck After Fifty Years
    BISMARCK AFTER FIFTY YEARS By ERICH EYCK Price One Shilling G8 HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 1948 GENERAL SERIES: G 8 BISMARCK AFTER FIFTY YEARS BY ERICH EYGK Price One Shilling Members may obtain extra copies at Id, each (post free) from the Hon. Secretary of the Association, 21, Bedford Square, London, W.C.I PUBLISHED FOR THE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION BY GEORGE PHILIP & SON, LTD., LONDON, E.C.4. 1948 THIS notable essay by Dr. Erich Eyck, the most distinguished Bismarckian scholar of our day, was written on the invitation of BISMARCK the Historical Association to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of Bismarck's death. Dr. Eyck, a German Liberal of the school AFTER FIFTY YEARS of Ludwig Bamberger, found his way to England in the early years of the Nazi government, and his massive three-volume Life of Bismarck, published in Switzerland between 1941 and 1944, ' THAT world history has to be re-written from time to time, was written mainly in this country. It will no doubt remain the about that there remains no doubt in our day. This necessity standard biography of Bismarck for many years to come, but, as exists, not because much about what has passed has been dis- publishing difficulties make the early appearance of an English covered since, but because new points of view arise, because the translation unlikely, this short reassessment of Bismarck's career contemporary of an advanced age is led into a position from which and summary of Dr. Eyck's conclusions is particularly welcome. the past can be surveyed and assessed anew.' Thus wrote Goethe one and a half centuries ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Developments in Europe During the 19Th Century
    Political Developments in Europe During the 19th Century TOPICS COVERED: -The Congress of Vienna -European nationalism -Changes to the Ottoman, Austrian, and Russian empires -The Unification of Italy -The Unification of Germany The Congress of Vienna (1814-1815) • After Napoleon’s defeat at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815, European heads of government were looking to establish long-lasting peace and stability on the continent. • The goal was collective security and stability for all of Europe. • A series of meetings known as the Congress of Vienna were called to set up policies to achieve this goal. This went on for 8 months. The Congress of Vienna (1814-1815) • Most of the decisions were made among representatives of the five “great powers”- Russia, Prussia, Austria, Great Britain, and France. • By far the most influential representative was the foreign minister of Austria, Klemens von Metternich. • Metternich distrusted the democratic ideals of the French Revolution and had 3 primary goals: 1. Prevent future French aggression by surrounding France with strong countries. 2. Restore a balance of power so that no country would be a threat to others. 3. Restore Europe’s traditional royal families to the thrones they held before Napoleon’s conquests. The Congress of Vienna (1814-1815) Results of the Congress of Vienna: • France’s neighboring countries were strengthened (ex: 39 German states were loosely joined to create the German Confederation; the former Austrian Netherlands and Dutch Netherlands were united to form the Kingdom of the Netherlands) • Ruling families of France, Spain, and several states in Italy and Central Europe regained their thrones (it was believed this would stabilize relations among European nations) The Congress of Vienna (1814-1815) Although France had been the aggressor under Napoleon, it was not severely punished at the Congress of Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 29 Revolutions and National States in the Atlantic World
    Chapter 29 Revolutions and National States in the Atlantic World THE CHAPTER IN PERSPECTIVE Revolutions shook the Atlantic world in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, bringing unprecedented political and social changes. The American Revolution brought independence from Great Britain and the creation of a new republic. Shortly thereafter a revolution broke out that radically transformed French society and shook Europe to its core. Central and South America, including the Caribbean, would undergo similar transformations. These revolutions spread Enlightenment ideals and promoted the consolidation of national states. OVERVIEW Popular Sovereignty and Political Upheaval Obviously, much of the intellectual foundation for this revolutionary age relates back directly to Enlightenment thinkers. Enlightenment ideals such as popular sovereignty, individual freedom, political and legal equality, and the social contract formed the core of the philosophy of these revolutionary thinkers. The American Revolution proved a natural, although at the time surprising, expression of these concepts. The overwhelming victory in the Seven Years’ War pushed the British ahead in the race for world hegemony, but it also increased tension with their North American colonies. Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence mirrored the influence of Enlightenment thinkers such as Locke as well as the growing colonial dissatisfaction with the nature of their constitutional relationship to England. The colonial victory in the resulting war—due to a combination of American grit, British indecisiveness, and French aid—stood as an example for other thinkers dreaming of a new world. The French were inspired by the American example but also pushed to carry out change on a much more profound and radical level.
    [Show full text]
  • FACEBOOK for DEAD PEOPLE and OTHER ESSAYS by Rachel Spurrier Submitted In
    FACEBOOK FOR DEAD PEOPLE AND OTHER ESSAYS By Rachel Spurrier Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors in the Dearptment of English Texas Christian University Fort Worth, Texas December 10, 2012 ii FACEBOOK FOR DEAD PEOPLE AND OTHER ESSAYS Project Approved: Alex Lemon, M.F.A. Department of English (Supervising Professor) Daniel Williams, Ph.D. Department of English Mark Dennis, Ph.D. Department of Religion iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................1 IT’S NOT YOUR FAULT, MARIE ANTOINETTE...………………...……………….............................3 FACEBOOK FOR DEAD PEOPLE.........................................................................................................49 I’D LIKE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT JESUS......................................................................................71 ACADIAN, CADIEN, CAJUN.................................................................................................................116 BIBLOGRAPHY FOR IT’S NOT YOUR FAULT, MARIE ANTOINETTE...............................137 BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR FACEBOOK FOR DEAD PEOPLE..........................................................138 BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR I’D LIKE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT JESUS.......................................139 BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR ACADIAN, CADIEN, CAJUN.....................................................................141 ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................................143
    [Show full text]
  • Unifications Balance of Germany Italy
    LEGACY OF NAPOLEON BONAPARTE . UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT TO UNIFY EUROPE UNDER FRENCH DOMINATION . AWAKENED FEELINGS OF NATIONALISM AND NATIONAL PRIDE . NAPOLEONIC CODE (SINGLE LAW CODE FOR ALL OF FRANCE/EUROPE) CONGRESS OF REVOLUTIONS . ANGER OVER THE NEW VIENNA CONGRESS OF VIENNA (MEETING TO . ESPECIALLY IN: o ITALY CLEAN UP AFTER o GERMANY NAPOLEON) . UNSUCCESSFUL 1848 UNIFICATIONS BALANCE OF GERMANY ITALY . OTTO von BISMARCK led . COUNT CAVOUR UNIFIES PRUSSIA in UNIFICATION THE NORTH . REALPOLITIK . GARIBALDI UNIFIES THE o JUSTIFIES ALL MEANS TO SOUTH HOLD POWER . PAPAL STATES ARE THE . CULMINATES IN THE LAST TO JOIN POWER FRANCO-PRUSSIAN WAR RETURN OF NEW MAP MEANWHILE IN GREAT BRITAIN… VS Conservative Liberal TO LEADS NATIONALISM EXPANDED POLITICAL RIGHTS ENDED SLAVERY INTRODUCTION TO NAPOLEON th Using pp. 204-212, find out more about the 19 century’s most influential leader. November 9, 1799 Describe how Napoleon got involved in the Military (p.204). __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Why would Napoleon have_______________ earned an award in October of 1795? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Themelios-44-3.Pdf
    An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 44 Issue 3 December 2019 EDITORIAL: But That’s Just Your Interpretation! 425 by D. A. Carson STRANGE TIMES: Remembering a Principal’s Principles 433 by Daniel Strange Cultural Marxism: Imaginary Conspiracy or 436 Revolutionary Reality? by Robert S. Smith Adam and Sin as the Bane of Evolution? A Review of 466 Finding Ourselves After Darwin by Hans Madueme Do Formal Equivalent Translations Reflect a Higher 477 View of Plenary, Verbal Inspiration? by William D. Mounce Power for Prayer through the Psalms: Cassiodorus’s 487 Interpretation of the Honey of Souls by Matthew Swale The Oxford Movement and Evangelicalism: Initial 503 Encounters by Kenneth J. Stewart Athens without a Statue to the Unknown God 517 by Kyle Beshears Inerrancy Is Not a Strong or Classical Foundationalism 530 by Mark Boone The God Who Reveals: A Response to J. L. 548 Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument by Daniel Wiley Book Reviews 560 DESCRIPTION Themelios is an international, evangelical, peer-reviewed theological journal that expounds and defends the historic Christian faith. Its primary audience is theological students and pastors, though scholars read it as well. Themelios began in 1975 and was operated by RTSF/UCCF in the UK, and it became a digital journal operated by The Gospel Coalition in 2008. The editorial team draws participants from across the globe as editors, essayists, and reviewers. Themelios is published three times a year online at The Gospel Coalition website in PDF and HTML, and may be purchased in digital format with Logos Bible Software and in print with Wipf and Stock.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET 15 - PAGE 1 of 29
    GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET 15 - PAGE 1 of 29 THIS IS GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET NUMBER FIFTEEN THE TOPIC OF STUDY IN THIS PACKET IS: • NATIONALISM - This topic is divided into twelve parts. This packet covers all twelve: 1) Nationalism – An Explanation 2) Nationalism and the French Revolution 3) Nationalism and the Latin American Independence Movements 4) Nationalism and the Unification of Germany and Italy 5) Nationalism and World War I 6) Nationalism and World War II 7) Nationalism and the Middle East 8) Nationalism and India – Gandhi 9) Nationalism and Africa 10) Nationalism and Britain’s Hesitancy to Participate in the European Union (EU) 11) Comparing Leaders of Nationalist Movements 12) Comparing Events Caused by Nationalism GLOBAL REGENTS REVIEW PACKET 15 - PAGE 2 of 29 NATIONALISM (divided into 12 parts) PART 1: NATIONALISM – AN EXPLANATION • NATIONALISM is a feeling of pride in and devotion to oneʼs country. It is a feeling that develops among people who may share a common language, history, set of traditions, or goal. Nationalism also causes people to join together to choose their own form of government, without outside interference. INDEPENDENCE, SOVEREIGNTY, AUTONOMY, SELF-DETERMINATION, and SELF-RULE The Global Regents Exam often uses the terms INDEPENDENCE, SOVEREIGNTY, AUTONOMY, SELF-DETERMINATION, and SELF-RULE. All of these terms refer to the right of the people of a certain nation to decide how they want to be governed without outside interference from any other country. When the term SELF-DETERMINATION is used, it is almost always used in the context of WOODROW WILSONʼS 14 POINTS that provided the foundation for the PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE held at conclusion of World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Von Bismarck “Germany's Iron Chancellor”
    Otto von Bismarck “Germany's Iron Chancellor” Otto von Bismarck was born on April 1, 1815 in the Germanic state of Schonhausen. He is considered to be the 'founder' of modern Germany. After studying law, Bismarck entered Prussian service and became a judicial administrator and eventually a Prussian ambassador to Russia and later France. By 1862 he returned to Berlin to become Prussia's Chancellor (Prime Minister). Despite strong steps toward economic unity, in 1862 Prussia remained the strongest state of a politically fragmented Germany. There were dozens of small German kingdoms. Bismarck was determined to unite all of them into a single nation state under the leadership of the Prussian King, Kaiser Wilhelm I. Bismarck understood it would not be easy to draw the German states into a unified whole under Prussian leadership. He crafted a strategy similar to Machiavelli's "let the end justify the means." Realpolitik, as it came to known, meant an unyielding drive to achieve national goals at any cost. There would be no room for weak-minded liberals who cared too much for principles. Bismarck viewed democracy as a government for the weak. In his famous "blood and iron" speech delivered to his Prussian parliament he stated, "Germany does not look to Prussia's liberalism, but to her power …. The great questions of the day are not to be decided by speeches and majority resolutions – but by blood and iron!" Upon being warned that he might face British opposition he stated, "What is England to me? The importance of a state is measured by the number of soldiers it can put into the field of battle … It is the destiny of the weak to be devoured by the strong." In a series of wars instigated by Bismarck between 1864 and 1870, Bismarck's realpolitik strategy paid off.
    [Show full text]