The Formation of the Milky Way Halo and Its Dwarf Satellites, a NLTE-1D Abundance Analysis. I. Homogeneous Set of Atmospheric Parameters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Formation of the Milky Way Halo and Its Dwarf Satellites, a NLTE-1D Abundance Analysis. I. Homogeneous Set of Atmospheric Parameters Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. dsph_parameters_final c ESO 2021 July 2, 2021 The formation of the Milky Way halo and its dwarf satellites, a NLTE-1D abundance analysis. I. Homogeneous set of atmospheric parameters L. Mashonkina1, 2, P. Jablonka3, 4, Yu. Pakhomov2, T. Sitnova2, and P. North3 1 Universitäts-Sternwarte München, Scheinerstr. 1, D-81679 München, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, RU-119017 Moscow, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 3 Laboratoire d’ Astrophysique, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Observatoire de Sauverny, CH-1290 Versoix, Switzerland 4 GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, F-92125 Meudon Cedex, France Received / Accepted ABSTRACT We present a homogeneous set of accurate atmospheric parameters for a complete sample of very and extremely metal-poor stars in the dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs) Sculptor, Ursa Minor, Sextans, Fornax, Boötes I, Ursa Major II, and Leo IV. We also deliver a Milky Way (MW) comparison sample of giant stars covering the 4 < [Fe/H] < 1.7 metallicity range. We show that, in the [Fe/H] % 3.7 regime, the non-local thermodynamic− equilibrium− (NLTE) calculations with non-spectroscopic − effective temperature (Teff) and surface gravity (log g) based on the photometric methods and known distance provide consistent abundances of the Fe i and Fe ii lines. This justifies the Fe i/Fe ii ionisation equilibrium method to determine log g for the MW halo giants with unknown distance. The atmospheric parameters of the dSphs and MW stars were checked with independent methods. In the [Fe/H] > 3.5 regime, the − Ti i/Ti ii ionisation equilibrium is fulfilled in the NLTE calculations. In the logg - Teff plane, all the stars sit on the giant branch of the evolutionary tracks corresponding to [Fe/H] = 2 to 4, in line with their metallicities. For some of the most metal-poor stars of our sample, we hardly achieve consistent NLTE abundances− − from the two ionisation stages for both iron and titanium. We suggest that this is a consequence of the uncertainty in the Teff-colour relation at those metallicities. The results of these work provide the base for a detailed abundance analysis presented in a companion paper. Key words. Stars: abundances – Stars: atmospheres – Stars: fundamental parameters – Local Group – galaxies: dwarf 1. Introduction [Fe/H]1 < 2) stars in the Draco, Sextans, and Ursa Mi- nor dSphs (Shetroneet− al. 2001) much of the observational How do the first stages of star formation proceed in galaxies? efforts were invested to obtain detailed chemical abundances Do galaxies follow a universal path, independant of their final of stars in the Milky Way satellites. The largest samples of masses? What is the level of homogeneity of the interstellar the VMP and extremely metal-poor (EMP, [Fe/H] < 3) medium from which stars form? How does it evolve? What is stars, which were observed with a spectral resolving power− the stellar initial mass function of the first stars? of R > 20 000, are available in the literature for the classi- These questions can essentially only be addressed in depth cal dSphs in Sculptor (Tafelmeyer et al. 2010, Kirby & Cohen in the Local Group. Only there can we analyse individual stars 2012, Jablonka et al. 2015, Simon et al. 2015) and Ursa Minor in sufficient detail to guide our understanding of the physics of (Sadakane et al. 2004, Cohen & Huang 2010, Kirby & Cohen arXiv:1704.07656v2 [astro-ph.SR] 2 May 2017 star formation, supernovae feeback, and the early build-up of 2012, Uraletal. 2015). As for the UFDs, the most studied galaxies. The comparison between ultra-faint, classical dwarf cases are Boötes I (Feltzinget al. 2009, Norrisetal. 2010, spheroidal galaxies (UFDs, dSphs), and the Milky Way pop- Gilmore et al. 2013, Ishigakiet al. 2014, Frebel et al. 2016), ulation offers a fantastic opportunity to probe different galaxy Segue 1 (Frebel et al. 2014), Coma Berenices and Ursa Major II masses, star formation histories, levels of chemical enrichement. (Frebel et al. 2010). However, the total number of new stars in Both nucleosynthetic processes and galaxy formation models each individual paper nowhere exceeds 7. Therefore, it is com- largely benefit from the diversity of the populations sampled that mon to combine these samples altogether. However, they were way. gathered with different spectroscopic setups and analysed in dif- We are, however, facing two limitations: ferent ways, with different methods of the determination of at- a) Heterogeneity in the samples. Since the first high- mospheric parameters, different model atmospheres, radiation resolution spectroscopic study of the very metal-poor (VMP, 1 In the classical notation, where [X/H] = log(N /N ) X H star − Send offprint requests to: L. Mashonkina; e-mail: [email protected] log(NX/NH)Sun. Article number, page 1 of 20 A&A proofs: manuscript no. dsph_parameters_final transfer and line formation codes, and line atomic data. This can and the ultra-faint dwarfs Boötes I, Ursa Major II (UMa II), and lead easily to inaccurate conclusions. Leo IV (Table1). This sample covers the 4 [Fe/H] < 1.5 b) Heterogeneity arises also, when applying the LTE as- metallicity range. It is assembled from the− following≤ papers:− sumption for determination of the chemical abundances of the stellar samples with various effective temperatures, surface grav- – Sculptor: Jablonka et al. (2015), Kirby & Cohen (2012), ities, and metallicities. Individual stars in the dSphs that are ac- Simon et al. (2015), and Tafelmeyer et al. (2010), cessible to high-resolution spectroscopy are all giants, and line – Ursa Minor: Cohen&Huang (2010), Kirby&Cohen formation, in particular in the metal-poor atmospheres, is sub- (2012), and Ural et al. (2015), ject to the departures from LTE because of low electron number – Fornax and Sextans: Tafelmeyer et al. (2010), density and low ultra-violet (UV) opacity. For each galaxy, the Milky Way or its satellites, the sampled range of metallicity can – Boötes I: Gilmore et al. (2013), Norris et al. (2010), and be large (Tolstoy et al. 2009). Similarly, the position of the stars Frebel et al. (2016, Boo-980), along the red giant branch (i.e., their effective temperatures and – UMa II: Frebel et al. (2010), surface gravities) can vary between samples. – Leo IV-S1: Simon et al. (2010). In the literature, determinations of atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances based on the non-local thermodynamic The comparison sample in the Milky Way halo was selected equilibrium (NLTE) line formation were reported for Milky Way from the literature based on the following criteria. stars spanning a large interval of metallicities (Hansen et al. 2013, Ruchti et al. 2013, Bensby et al. 2014, Sitnova et al. 2015, 1. The MW and dSph stellar samples should have similar tem- Zhao et al. 2016), however, none has yet treated both the Milky peratures, luminosities, and metallicity range: cool giants Way and the dSph stellar samples. with T ff 5250 K and [Fe/H] < 2. In this context, our project aims at providing a homogeneous e ≤ − 2. High spectral resolution (R > 30 000) observational material set of atmospheric parameters and elemental abundances for the should be accessible VMP and EMP stars in aset of dSphsas well as for a Milky Way halo comparison sample. By employing high-resolution spectral 3. Photometry in the V, I, J, K bands was available to derive observations and treating the NLTE line formation, our desire photometric Teff. is to push the accuracy of the abundance analysis to the point where the trends of the stellar abundance ratios with metallicity Binaries, variables, carbon-enhancedstars, and Ca-poor stars can be robustly discussed. were ignored. In the following, we present the determination of accurate at- As a result, the MW comparison sample includes 12 stars mospheric parameters: effective temperatures, Teff, surface grav- from Cohen et al. (2013, hereafter, CCT13), two stars from ities, log g, iron abundances (metallicity, [Fe/H]), and micro- Mashonkina et al. (2010, 2014), and nine stars from Burris et al. turbulence velocities, ξt. We rely on the photometric methods, (2000). For the latter subsample we used spectra from the VLT2 when deriving the effective temperatures. The surface gravities / UVES2 and CFHT/ESPaDOnS3 archives. are based on the known distance for the dSph stars and estab- The characteristics of the stellar spectra, which were used in lishing the NLTE ionisation equilibrium between Fe i and Fe ii this analysis, are summarized in Table1. Details on the observa- for the Milky Way stars. The metallicities and microturbulence tions and the data reduction can be found in the original papers. velocities were determined from the NLTE calculations for Fe i- We based our study on the published equivalent widths (Wobss) ii. A companion paper focuses on the NLTE abundances of a and line profile fitting, where the observed spectra are available, large set of chemical elements, spanning from Na to Ba, and the as indicated in Table1. analysis of the galaxy abundance trends. The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 describes the stellar sample and the observational material. Effective tempera- 3. Effective temperatures tures are determined in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, we demonstrate that the Fe i/Fe ii ionisation equilibrium method is working in NLTE This study is based on photometric effective temperatures. We down to extremely low metallicities and we derive spectroscopic could adopt the published data for about half of our sample, surface gravities for the Milky Way (MW) giant sample. The namely: stellar atmosphere parameters are checked with the Ti i/Ti ii ion- isation equilibrium and a set of theoretical evolutionary tracks in – stars in the Sculptor, Fornax, and Sextans dSphs, for Sect. 5. Comparison with the literature is conducted in Sect.
Recommended publications
  • Chemistry and Kinematics of Stars in Local Group Galaxies
    Chemistry and kinematics of stars in Local Group galaxies Giuseppina Battaglia ESO Garching In collaboration with DART (E.Tolstoy, M.Irwin, A.Helmi, V.Hill, B.Letarte, P.Jablonka, K.Venn, M.Shetrone, N.Arimoto, F.Primas, A.Kaufer, T. Szeifert, P. François,T.Abel) Dwarf spheroidal galaxies Small (half-light radius= 0.1-1kpc), devoid of gas, pressure supported SSccuulplpttoorr FFoorrnnaaxx Typical dSph Unusual dSph • Distance: 79 kpc • Distance: 138 kpc • Faint (Lv~ 10^6 Lsun) • Most luminous (Lv~10^7 Lsun) and and metal poor metal rich of MW satellites SFHs from Grebel, Gallagher & Harbeck 2007 (see also Monkiewicz et al. 1999, Stetson et al. 1998, Buonanno et al.1999, Saviane et al. 2000) Time [Gyr] Time [Gyr] Motivation • Galaxy formation on the smallest scales – Evolution and distribution of stellar populations – Chemical enrichment histories – All dSphs contain > 10 Gyr old stars => early universe • Most dark-matter dominated galaxies – Measure dark-matter distribution – Constrain the nature of dark-matter (warm, cold...) • Galaxy formation: building blocks of large galaxies? TThhee LLooccaall GGrroouupp Grebel et al. 2000 Large Dwarf ellipticals (dE); Dwarf irregulars dSphs/dIrrs spirals dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) (dIrr) dI rr Large majority DDAARRTT LLaarrggee PPrrooggrraamm aatt EESSOO • 4 dSphs in the MW halo: Sextans, Sculptor, Fornax, Carina (HR only) • Extended ESO/WFI imaging (CMD) probable members • VLT/FLAMES Low Resolution (LR) X probable non members spectra of 100s Red Giant Branch (RGB) stars in CaII triplet (CaT) region
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide: Orion
    Legends of the Night Sky Orion Educator’s Guide Grades K - 8 Written By: Dr. Phil Wymer, Ph.D. & Art Klinger Legends of the Night Sky: Orion Educator’s Guide Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………....3 Constellations; General Overview……………………………………..4 Orion…………………………………………………………………………..22 Scorpius……………………………………………………………………….36 Canis Major…………………………………………………………………..45 Canis Minor…………………………………………………………………..52 Lesson Plans………………………………………………………………….56 Coloring Book…………………………………………………………………….….57 Hand Angles……………………………………………………………………….…64 Constellation Research..…………………………………………………….……71 When and Where to View Orion…………………………………….……..…77 Angles For Locating Orion..…………………………………………...……….78 Overhead Projector Punch Out of Orion……………………………………82 Where on Earth is: Thrace, Lemnos, and Crete?.............................83 Appendix………………………………………………………………………86 Copyright©2003, Audio Visual Imagineering, Inc. 2 Legends of the Night Sky: Orion Educator’s Guide Introduction It is our belief that “Legends of the Night sky: Orion” is the best multi-grade (K – 8), multi-disciplinary education package on the market today. It consists of a humorous 24-minute show and educator’s package. The Orion Educator’s Guide is designed for Planetarians, Teachers, and parents. The information is researched, organized, and laid out so that the educator need not spend hours coming up with lesson plans or labs. This has already been accomplished by certified educators. The guide is written to alleviate the fear of space and the night sky (that many elementary and middle school teachers have) when it comes to that section of the science lesson plan. It is an excellent tool that allows the parents to be a part of the learning experience. The guide is devised in such a way that there are plenty of visuals to assist the educator and student in finding the Winter constellations.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Star-Forming Dwarf Galaxies in the Antlia Cluster?
    A&A 563, A118 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322615 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Searching for star-forming dwarf galaxies in the Antlia cluster? O. Vaduvescu1,C.Kehrig2, L. P. Bassino3,4,5, A. V. Smith Castelli3,4,5, and J. P. Calderón3,4,5 1 Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apto. 321, 38700 Santa Cruz de la Palma, Canary Islands, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Apto. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain 3 Grupo de Investigación CGGE, Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina 4 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), C1033AAJ Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina 5 Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata (CCT-La Plata, CONICET-UNLP), Paseo del Bosque, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina Received 5 September 2013 / Accepted 31 January 2014 ABSTRACT Context. The formation and evolution of dwarf galaxies in clusters need to be understood, and this requires large aperture telescopes. Aims. In this sense, we selected the Antlia cluster to continue our previous work in the Virgo, Fornax, and Hydra clusters and in the Local Volume (LV). Because of the scarce available literature data, we selected a small sample of five blue compact dwarf (BCD) candidates in Antlia for observation. Methods. Using the Gemini South and GMOS camera, we acquired the Hα imaging needed to detect star-forming regions in this sample. With the long-slit spectroscopic data of the brightest seven knots detected in three BCD candidates, we derived their basic chemical properties.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is an Ultra-Faint Galaxy?
    What is an ultra-faint Galaxy? UCSB KITP Feb 16 2012 Beth Willman (Haverford College) ~ 1/10 Milky Way luminosity Large Magellanic Cloud, MV = -18 image credit: Yuri Beletsky (ESO) and APOD NGC 205, MV = -16.4 ~ 1/40 Milky Way luminosity image credit: www.noao.edu Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/300 Milky Way luminosity MV = -14.2 Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/2700 Milky Way luminosity MV = -11.9 Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/14,000 Milky Way luminosity MV = -10.1 ~ 1/40,000 Milky Way luminosity ~ 1/1,000,000 Milky Way luminosity Ursa Major 1 Finding Invisible Galaxies bright faint blue red Willman et al 2002, Walsh, Willman & Jerjen 2009; see also e.g. Koposov et al 2008, Belokurov et al. Finding Invisible Galaxies Red, bright, cool bright Blue, hot, bright V-band apparent brightness V-band faint Red, faint, cool blue red From ARAA, V26, 1988 Willman et al 2002, Walsh, Willman & Jerjen 2009; see also e.g. Koposov et al 2008, Belokurov et al. Finding Invisible Galaxies Ursa Major I dwarf 1/1,000,000 MW luminosity Willman et al 2005 ~ 1/1,000,000 Milky Way luminosity Ursa Major 1 CMD of Ursa Major I Okamoto et al 2008 Distribution of the Milky Wayʼs dwarfs -14 Milky Way dwarfs 107 -12 -10 classical dwarfs V -8 5 10 Sun M L -6 ultra-faint dwarfs Canes Venatici II -4 Leo V Pisces II Willman I 1000 -2 Segue I 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
    [Show full text]
  • Oriontelescopes.Com Oct
    THE EVENING SKY FOR OCTOBER, 2014 NORTH Early October — 10 p.m. Mid October — 9 p.m. URSA MAJOR Late October — 8 p.m. Pointers Big Dipper M51 ζ M81 Winter Hexagon2281 M82 κ M101 LYNX BOÖTES URSA μ M37 AURIGA MINOR M I L K Y W A Y DRACO CAMELOPARDALIS M36 Polaris Little Dipper M38 Capella α CORONA 16,17 BOREALIS ε M1 6543 ν M13 SERPENS CAPUT Double M92 Cluster CEPHEUS Keystone M103 ρ 457 Algol β PERSEUS η M52 Aldebaran μ E M34 δ Vega C 7789 ε Double-Double L γ Hyades I M45 CASSIOPEIA ζ HERCULES P Pleiades M39 Deneb LYRA T TRIANGULUM ORION I M31 α C 7243 M57 752 M110 CYGNUS EAST 7000 M29 χ M32 61 M56 (P a M33 6871 th β o ANDROMEDA Albireo f ARIES OPHIUCHUS WEST S LACERTA Summer Triangle u n TAURUS & VULPECULA I.4665 p γ M27 la n 6633 et s) SAGITTA E 70 Q Great Square DELPHINUS U γ A T γ PISCES of Pegasus O ϑ M14 R PEGASUS M15 Altair Uranus α γ ζ SERPENS EQUULEUS CAUDA Mira ο TX AQUILA M I L KM11 Y W A Y SCUTUM M26 ζ M2 M16 ERIDANUS M17 Neptune M18 AQUARIUS α M24 M25 CETUS M28 M22 7293 FORNAX 253 M30 SAGITTARIUS CAPRICORNUS Teapot Fomalhaut M55 SCULPTOR PISCIS AUSTRINUS 0 55 MICROSCOPIUM 0 20 Star magnitudes N IO R TI Moon IL PHOENIX W Phases GRUS –1 012345 FIRST Oct. 1 SOUTH Double star FULL How To Use This Chart Variable star Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Comparison of the Dark Matter Profiles
    A&A 558, A35 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321606 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics Model comparison of the dark matter profiles of Fornax, Sculptor, Carina and Sextans Maarten A. Breddels and Amina Helmi Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2013 / Accepted 16 August 2013 ABSTRACT Aims. We compare dark matter profile models of four dwarf spheroidal galaxies satellites of the Milky Way using Bayesian evidence. Methods. We use orbit based dynamical models to fit the 2nd and 4th moments of the line of sight velocity distributions of the Fornax, Sculptor, Carina and Sextans dwarf spheroidal galaxies. We compare NFW, Einasto and several cored profiles for their dark halos and present the probability distribution functions of the model parameters. Results. For each galaxy separately we compare the evidence for the various dark matter profiles, and find that it is not possible to distinguish between these specific parametric dark matter density profiles using the current data. Nonetheless, from the combined 2 β/2 evidence, we find that is unlikely that all galaxies are embedded in the same type of cored profiles of the form ρDM ∝ 1/(1 + r ) , where β = 3, 4. For each galaxy, we also obtain an almost model independent, and therefore accurate, constraint on the logarithmic slope of the dark matter density distribution at a radius ∼r−3, i.e. where the logarithmic slope of the stellar density profile is −3. Conclusions. For each galaxy, we find that all best fit models essentially have the same mass distribution over a large range in radius (from just below r−3 to the last measured data point).
    [Show full text]
  • 2391 (Created: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 5:00:39 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview
    JWST Proposal 2391 (Created: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 5:00:39 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview 2391 - The resolved properties of PAHs at low metallicity Cycle: 1, Proposal Category: GO INVESTIGATORS Name Institution E-Mail Dr. Julia Christine Roman-Duval (PI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Bruce T. Draine (CoI) Princeton University [email protected] Dr. Karl D. Gordon (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Aleksandra Hamanowicz (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Christopher Clark (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Martha L. Boyer (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Karin Marie Sandstrom (CoI) University of California - San Diego [email protected] Dr. Jeremy Chastenet (CoI) (ESA Member) Ghent University [email protected] OBSERVATIONS Folder Observation Label Observing Template Science Target MIRI IC1613 2 MIRI Imaging (1) IC-1613 6 NIRCam Imaging (1) IC-1613 SEXTANS-A 5 MIRI Imaging (2) SEXTANS-A 9 MIRI Imaging (2) SEXTANS-A 8 MIRI Imaging (2) SEXTANS-A 7 NIRCam Imaging (2) SEXTANS-A ABSTRACT The NIR-MIR SED of galaxies is dominated by spectral features from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules fluorescing in regions illuminated by FUV photons. In low metallicity systems (Z < 0.2 Zo), previous studies with Spitzer have revealed a substantial deficiency in the 1 JWST Proposal 2391 (Created: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 5:00:39 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview emission and abundance of PAHs, the origin of which remains unexplained due to the lack of deep, resolved, multi-band photometry or spectroscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Properties of Galaxies in the Virgo and Fornax Clusters: What We've
    The Properties of Galaxies in the Virgo and Fornax Clusters: What We’ve Learned Patrick Côté (HIA) HST Observations (11/07) Virgo Fornax solar system star clusters galaxies/AGN other stars ISM/nebulae galaxy clusters 30 March - 3 April, 2009, “Galaxy Evolution and Environment”, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Talk Outline • The Virgo and Fornax Clusters in Context • Properties at a Glance stellar nuclei globular AGNs/SBHs & SBHs cluster systems Virgo luminosity red sequence & functions galaxy scaling Fornax relations diffuse light cluster & the ICM structure & UCDS, cEs morphology • A Look Ahead: The Next Generation Virgo Cluster Survey • Summary and Conclusions Virgo and Fornax at a Glance Virgo Fornax Richness Class 1 0 Ω ≈ 100 deg2 ≈ 10 deg2 Distance 16.5 ± 0.1 ± 1.1 Mpc 20.0 ± 0.3 ± 1.4 Mpc σ(vr) ≈ 750 km/s (A), 400 km/s (B) 374 ± 26 km/s R200 1.55 ± 0.06 Mpc (5.4 ± 0.2 deg) ≈ 0.67 Mpc (1.9 deg): Rs 0.56 ± 0.18 Mpc (1.9 ± 0.6 deg) ≈ 50 kpc (0.14 deg): c 2.8 ± 0.7 13.4: 14 13 M200 (4.2 ± 0.5)×10 M⦿ ~ 1.3×10 M⦿ Mgas/Mtot 8-14% (A), ≈ 0.5% (B) ~ 8% Mgal/Mtot 3-4% (A), ≈ 4% (B) ~ 6% ‹kT›x 2.58 ± 0.03 keV 1.20 ± 0.04 keV ‹Fe›x 0.34 ± 0.02 solar 0.23 ± 0.03 solar Virgo and Fornax at a Glance Virgo Fornax Richness Class 1 0 Ω ≈ 100 deg2 ≈ 10 deg2 Distance 16.5 ± 0.1 ± 1.1 Mpc 20.0 ± 0.3 ± 1.4 Mpc σ(vr) ≈ 750 km/s (A), 400 km/s (B) 374 ± 26 km/s R200 1.55 ± 0.06 Mpc (5.4 ± 0.2 deg) ≈ 0.67 Mpc (1.9 deg): Rs 0.56 ± 0.18 Mpc (1.9 ± 0.6 deg) ≈ 50 kpc (0.14 deg): c 2.8 ± 0.7 13.4: 14 13 M200 (4.2 ± 0.5)×10 M⦿ ~ 1.3×10 M⦿ Mgas/Mtot 8-14% (A), ≈ 0.5% (B) ~ 8% Mgal/Mtot 3-4% (A), ≈ 4% (B) ~ 6% ‹kT›x 2.58 ± 0.03 keV 1.20 ± 0.04 keV ‹Fe›x 0.34 ± 0.02 solar 0.23 ± 0.03 solar Cluster Morphology: Virgo • Smith and Shapley (1930s), Reaves (1950s-1980s), de Vaucouleurs et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dwarf Spheroidal Kinematics with Large Radial Velocity Samples Matthew G
    Near-Field Cosmology with Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies Proceedings IAU Colloquium No. 198, 2005 c 2005 International Astronomical Union H. Jerjen and B. Binggeli, eds. doi:10.1017/S1743921305003583 Dwarf spheroidal kinematics with large radial velocity samples Matthew G. Walker† Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA email: [email protected] Abstract. I present a large sample of precise (±2 km/s) stellar radial velocities obtained to serve as kinematic tracers in Milky Way dwarf spheroidal (dSph) satellite galaxies. This includes velocities for ∼750 member stars spanning several core radii in the Sculptor dSph, and ∼400 member stars extending out to the nominal tidal radius of the Fornax dSph. The resulting radial velocity dispersion profiles are flat, with no evidence for a sharp decrease in the velocity dispersion at large galactocentric radius in either Sculptor of Fornax. Application of a non- parametric method for estimating the radial mass distributions gives results consistent with mass determinations from classical analyses, with lower limits of [M/L]V ∼7 for Fornax and [M/L]V ∼4 for Sculptor. Keywords. dwarf spheroidal galaxies, dark matter, non-parametric MMFS: A Powerful New Instrument The Michigan MIKE Fiber System (MMFS) is a multi-object echelle spectrograph operational at the twin Magellan 6.5m telescopes of Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. The system consists of two sets of 128 fibers, each accepting light into a 1.4 arcsec aperture and feeding the MIKE spectrograph’s two channels (split by a dichroic at 5000A).˚ Both channels of MIKE deliver spectra having R∼20000 at high efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Variable Star Population in the Sextans Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy
    TheThe variablevariable starstar populationpopulation inin thethe SextansSextans dwarfdwarf spheroidalspheroidal galaxygalaxy Kathy Vivas Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory La Serena, Chile In collaboration with Javier Alonso-García (U. of Antofagasta, Chile) Mario Mateo (U. of Michigan, USA) Alistair Walker (CTIO, Chile) David Nidever (NOAO, USA) DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 1 The Role of Variable Stars ● Tracers of different stellar populations ● Standard candles → Distance Scale Variable stars in the Carina dwarf spheroidal galaxy (Vivas & Mateo 2013) DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 2 Properties of the Satellites of the Milky Way Drlica-Wagner et al., 2015 The new discoveries are likely to be ultra-faint dwarf galaxies. Gallart et al. 2015 Classical dwarfs display a variety of SFRs DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 3 CMDs of Satellite Dwarfs Brown et al 2014 On the other hand, ultra-faint dwarfs seem Monelli et al 2003 to be consistent with only and old Galaxies like Carina show obvious population signs of multiple bursts of star formation DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 4 Leo T: a UFD with extended star formation Clementini et al (2012) DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 5 Helium-Burning Pulsating Stars 3.0 Anomalous Cepheids 2.0 0.7 RR Lyrae Stars Variable stars and theoretical isochrones in Leo I (Fiorentino et al 2012) DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 6 Dwarf Cepheid Stars (collective name for δ Scuti or SX Phe) Intermediate age population TO Old Population TO Coppola et al 2015, Vivas & Mateo 2013 DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 7 Dwarf Cepheids as distance indicators Need to study more systems! Cohen et al (2012) P-L relationship (independent of metallicity) → standard candles DECam Community Science Workshop 2018 8 Dwarf Cepheids in other galaxies 85 dwarf cepheids in Fornax A few thousand in (Poretti et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Night Sky This Month
    The Night Sky (April 2020) BST (Universal Time plus one hour) is used this month. Northern Horizon Eastern Western Horizon Horizon 23:00 BST at beginning of the month 22:00 BST in middle of month 21:00 BST at end of month Southern Horizon The General Weather Pattern Surprisingly rainfall is not particularly high in April, but of course heavy rain showers do occur, often with hail and thunder. Expect it to be cloudy. Temperatures usually rise steadily, but clear evenings can still be cold with very cold mornings. Wear multiple layers of clothes, with a warm hat, socks and shoes to maintain body heat. As always, an energy snack and a flask containing a warm non-alcoholic drink might well be welcome at some time. Should you be interested in obtaining a detailed weather forecast for observing in the Usk area, log on to https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/seeing/usk_united-kingdom_2635052 other locations are available. Earth (E) As the Earth moves from the vernal equinox in March, the days are still opening out rapidly. The Moon no longer raises high in the mid-night sky as it does in the winter, but relocates at lower latitudes for the summer. The Sun, of course, does the converse. Artificial Satellites or Probes Should you be interested in observing the International Space Station or other space craft, carefully log on to http://www.heavens-above.com to acquire up-to-date information for your observing site. Sun Conditions apply as to the use of this matter. © D J Thomas 2020 (N Busby 2019) The Sun is becoming better placed for observing as it climbs to more northerly latitudes, and, it is worth reminding members that sunlight contains radiation across the spectrum that is harmful to our eyes and that the projection method should be used.
    [Show full text]