DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation Report Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Knutsford

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultation Report Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Knutsford Consultation Report Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Knutsford Town Council October 2018 Project name and Number: 16-024_Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Document Name and Revision: Consultation Report_001 Prepared by: TR/JP/BP Reviewed By: BP/JP Date of Issue: October 2018 Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Initial Residents Survey ............................................................................................................................... 5 3. Informal Consultation ............................................................................................................................... 10 4. Emerging Policies Consultation ............................................................................................................... 11 5. Regulation 14 Consultation ...................................................................................................................... 16 6. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 19 Appendix 1 – Initial Survey Age Gap Analysis ................................................................................................ 20 Appendix 2 – Initial Survey Gap Analysis (Location) ..................................................................................... 22 Appendix 3 – Informal Consultation Table ..................................................................................................... 24 Appendix 4 – Quantitative Data from Initial Survey ....................................................................................... 30 Appendix 5 – EPD Feedback: Three outstanding Issues ............................................................................... 32 Appendix 6 – Emerging Policies Document Age Analysis ............................................................................. 36 Appendix 7 – Emerging Policies Document Gap Analysis (Location) .......................................................... 38 Appendix 8 - Quantitative Regulation 14 Data ................................................................................................ 40 3 Consultation Report 1. Introduction and were formed mid-late 2015. The working groups would ultimately go on to facilitate the consultation events, 1.1. The following document forms the along with their consultants, Urban Consultation Report and seeks to Imprint. provide an overview of the consultation and engagement of stakeholders in Summary of Consultation preparation of the Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan. Informal Meetings undertaken by the individual working groups: 2015 - 2018 1.2. The document collates work sourced List available in Appendix 4 from a range of different types of events and methods for collecting the views of local residents, landowners and agents, businesses, statutory bodies, local groups to name a few. 1.3. Using such a range of methods aims to Initial Residents Survey – August 2016 ensure that all those that want to input into the project have the opportunity to, Gap Analysis available in Appendix 1 and 2 (age and location) and the plan seeks to represent all stakeholders. 1.4. Key findings from each form of consultation are recorded and summarised in order to draw out the key themes and concerns raised by Emerging Policies Document (EPD) – stakeholders. The comments will be November 2017 grouped and ranked according to the Emerging Policies document and other frequency that they are raised. consultation documents are available in the Core Documents library. 1.5. Part I explores and collates the consultation responses which refer to The Quantitative Data and Gap Analysis are general issues that the Neighbourhood available in Appendix 4, 6 and 7 (age and Plan should seek to address and location) naturally centres around core themes such as transport, recreation, and housing. The Neighbourhood Plan Working Groups: Regulation 14 Consultation – May and July 2018 1.6. The Town Council decided that several Working Groups offered the best means Quantitative and Qualitative data are both available in the Core Documents library. to produce a plan. The groups were made up from a number of resident A summary of the quantitative data is available volunteers and several town councillors in Appendix 6. 4 Consultation Report 2. Initial Residents Survey 2.7. Publicity was provided on the Town Council website, the local press and on posters around the town, promoted by The Survey the Town Mayor and the Chairman of the Neighbourhood Plan Committee. The 2.1. In summer 2016, a resident’s survey broad results are presented below, designed by the Town Council was sent however, full details are available as part out to homes in Knutsford. of spreadsheets submitted as part of the 2.2. The survey contained questions on the core documents with the Neighbourhood quality of Knutsford and the current way Plan. of life so that the Neighbourhood Plan 2.8. The key findings of the questionnaire are group could gain a better understanding set out below, by theme / topic. of the key issues which the Neighbourhood Plan could address. Community Places 2.3. The survey received a varied response 2.9. Most respondents have determined that with some questions receiving a higher the existing community places in number of responses than others. Knutsford are ‘good’ with regards to Notable responses were identified by the availability, quality, and location of higher number of respondents (which facilities. However, many commented on equate to approximately 250). the poor condition of the Leisure Centre and the lack of parking and variety the The Questionnaire Document services offer. 2.4. The survey questionnaire was divided in 2.10. There is a strong consensus that a new to 9 themes: Community Places, function hall is required in the town and Education, Employment, Environment the community agree that Knutsford is and Open Space, Getting Around, Health, missing a centrally located health centre Heritage, Housing, and Town Centre. and facilities for the youth. 2.5. The survey questionnaire was developed Education by the Neighbourhood Plan Committee, with inputs from a number of working 2.11. The survey revealed that the current groups. Each section was specifically primary school, adult education and targeted towards key issues or questions special education needs were viewed as on a particular theme. The sections were having significantly inadequate provision grouped together in an A5 booklet that and will not be able to support additional was distributed. A copy is contained with growth. the core documents submitted with this plan. 2.12. Reponses highlighted that close to/in the middle of any new housing development 2.6. A copy of the questionnaire issued to all would be the ideal location for a new households was available online for primary school. completion using a survey monkey. Nearly 750 completed questionnaires 5 Consultation Report 2.13. 63% of residents revealed that they will 2.19. 28 respondents highlighted that the not support any housing development on Leisure Centre required further school playing fields and 49% support investment and improvements and a the retention of these spaces for better-quality swimming pool is needed. community purposes. Getting Around Employment 2.20. It was highlighted in the survey that the 2.14. Several residents highlighted that the existing narrow and poor-quality questions in this section were leading pavements were a significant issue in and were not sure what the approach Knutsford. Alongside on-street car behind them was. parking on the busier streets meant that those with wheelchairs and prams found 2.15. However, 48% of respondents to the it difficult to navigate the town. This is survey highlighted that improvements to exacerbated by the poor quality public the public transport network and access transport network and the lack of will support employment opportunities in provision of parking facilities. the town. 61% would only support employment development in the town 2.21. The survey revealed that many where they contribute to the character of respondents believe that all development Knutsford. in Knutsford should contribute to improvement in the efficiency and safety 2.16. It was also identified that the community of the transport network (67%), should will not support the development of any aim to reduce congestion (67%) and shops in residential areas (110 improve and develop both pedestrian responses) and large retail/ super stores and cycle networks (61% and 48%). in both residential and edge of town areas (45 responses). Health Environment, Open Spaces, Leisure, and Sport 2.22. 74% of the total respondents to the initial survey revealed that the current 2.17. It was revealed that the Health, the Moor, provision of healthcare facilities was Tatton Park, the surrounding sufficient to accommodate the increase countryside, and the quality parks are in growth. 64% of respondents stated aspects of Knutsford that are most that better accessibility to these facilities important to the community. via walking and cycling and the public transport network need to be a priority. 2.18. Respondents also highlighted that the ‘bad’ elements of the town were the 2.23. 54% consider existing air and noise Manchester Airport flight path and the pollution (likely from Manchester Airport subsequent air pollution,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 4 Detailed Proposals for Each Ward – Organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP)
    Appendix 4 Detailed proposals for each Ward – organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP) Proposed Wards within the Knutsford Local Area Partnership Knutsford Local Area Partnership (LAP) is situated towards the north-west of Cheshire East, and borders Wilmslow to the north-east, Macclesfield to the south-east and Congleton to the south. The M6 and M56 motorways pass through this LAP. Hourly train services link Knutsford, Plumley and Mobberley to Chester and Manchester, while in the east of this LAP hourly trains link Chelford with Crewe and Manchester. The town of Knutsford was the model for Elizabeth Gaskell's novel Cranford and scenes from the George C. Scott film Patton were filmed in the centre of Knutsford, in front of the old Town Hall. Barclays Bank employs thousands of people in IT and staff support functions at Radbroke Hall, just outside the town of Knutsford. Knutsford is home to numerous sporting teams such as Knutsford Hockey Club, Knutsford Cricket Club, Knutsford Rugby Club and Knutsford Football Club. Attractions include Tatton Park, home of the RHS Flower show, the stately homes Arley Hall, Tabley House and Peover Hall, and the Cuckooland Museum of cuckoo clocks. In detail, the proposals are: Knutsford is a historic, self-contained urban community with established extents and comprises the former County Ward of Knutsford, containing 7 polling districts. The Parish of Knutsford also mirrors the boundary of this proposal. Knutsford Town is surrounded by Green Belt which covers 58% of this proposed division. The proposed ward has excellent communications by road, motorway and rail and is bounded to the north by Tatton Park and to the east by Birkin Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / NORTH WEST Contents
    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / NORTH WEST Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK 6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 2008 20 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 Contents Key to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / NORTH WEST HERITAGE AT RISK IN THE NORTH WEST Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / NORTH WEST We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
    [Show full text]
  • Legend DRAFT
    Rs FP11 40m The scaling of this drawing cannot be assured Half Plantation Chestnut Track Mb FP69 Little Mere 50m Issues 55m Slip 64m 50m Kell House Revision Date Drn Ckd 35m Farm 38m FB Brookside Me FP4 51m 59m W Farm - - - - Path Golf Course 51m 35m N Track Mb FP71 40m 50m Walk Mill W Path 40m Covert Issues M Home 60m E Tatton Dale Barnshaw R Farm Mb FP69 45m E Mereside Farm Farm S Mb FP68 65m D Rostherne Drive Track Fish Pond I D A O 30m E R Coverts Y 40m 66m E P L Legend E R 57m H P LC S 55m Belt O Track M P A E Clay A Shading Two Wood R 45m opper D 43m Track House Pond S Gates 44m Dairy Wood W T Site Boundary R New Mills 55m Harrison's Cattle Marlowe ley E Issues Croft Pens E 57m Parkside T 56m 35m Brook Drain Iss Iss Farm 39m Saddleback Pp Ho 35m PW 52m Plantations Sls 58m Saddleback Mill 59m P Meml I N Pool WOOD LANE Plantations E 67m 57m Track FB Issues T Existing Woodlands, Copses and Tree Belts ^ 57m Mill Pool Wood R E Path E 58m Ice Pp Ho S Jetty 65m 65m Stable Majority Pond Track Cottage 57m 55m Talisker Lady Mary's Walk Track 61m Clump Issues 42m Pp 50m Track Jetty Mere Ho FBs 49m Track 50m Cottage 55m LC A50 Egerton Issues Drain Jetty Egerton 46m A556 The Springs 41m FB The Mere Dairy Clump 40m Ancient Woodland # Mere S Jetty Clump M Wood Raleigh Wood Four Lane A Drains Mere Golf Fourlane-ends L 55m 49m L Ends L MERE CP and A N E Country Club 60m Tatton Park 58m Sugar Brook El Sub Knutsford Drive Mere Hall 50m 62m 66m Track Sta War Lodge Chestnut Owen House Meml 40m Clump TATTON CP Swan A50 Farm Clump 45m 60m 60m 41m Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Head of Holly Grove, Tabley, Cheshire, Wa16 0Hr
    Application No: 11/3828M Location: HEAD OF HOLLY GROVE, TABLEY, CHESHIRE, WA16 0HR Proposal: Development of 8 Dwellings Applicant: PEAKS & PLAINS HOUSING TRUST Expiry Date: 13-Dec-2011 Date Report Prepared: 20 December 2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION : Approve subject to conditions and the prior completion of a S106 legal agreement MAIN ISSUES • Whether the principle of affordable housing in this location is acceptable • Whether the need for affordable housing has been proven • Whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt and if so, whether there are any very special circumstances • The design and appearance of the proposal and its impact on the character, appearance and openness of the area • The impact of the proposal on the amenity of nearby residents • Whether access and parking arrangements are suitable • The impact of the proposal on existing trees and landscaping • The impact of the proposal on protected species REASON FOR REPORT The application has been called in to the Northern Planning Committee by the local Ward Member, Councillor Steve Wilkinson. Councillor Wilkinson cites the “concerns expressed by residents over highway safety issues, including insufficient visitor parking within the development given that a parking problem already exists within the existing Holly Grove, access to sewerage septic tank by United Utilities wagon adjacent to the proposed development.” DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND CONTEXT The application site comprises an open area of land at the head of Holly Grove. The site comprises three domestic garage structures and three caravans appeared to be stored there. United Utilities require access through the site to their sewerage disposal facility at the northern end of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Charges 2020-2021
    COUNCIL TAX CHARGES 2020-2021 Name A B C D E F G H Parish Total Parish Total Parish Total Parish Total Parish Total Parish Total Parish Total Parish Total Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Charge Adult Social Care 87.25 101.79 116.33 130.87 159.95 189.03 218.12 261.74 CHESHIRE EAST BOROUGH COUNCIL 915.41 1,067.97 1,220.54 1,373.11 1,678.25 1,983.38 2,288.52 2,746.22 CHESHIRE FIRE AUTHORITY 52.86 61.67 70.48 79.29 96.91 114.53 132.15 158.58 POLICE & CRIME COMMISSIONER 140.29 163.68 187.06 210.44 257.20 303.97 350.73 420.88 1,195.81 1,395.11 1,594.41 1,793.71 2,192.31 2,590.91 2,989.52 3,587.42 ACTON PARISH COUNCIL 9.75 1,205.56 11.37 1,406.48 13.00 1,607.41 14.62 1,808.33 17.87 2,210.18 21.12 2,612.03 24.37 3,013.89 29.24 3,616.66 ADLINGTON PARISH COUNCIL 16.69 1,212.50 19.47 1,414.58 22.25 1,616.66 25.03 1,818.74 30.59 2,222.90 36.15 2,627.06 41.72 3,031.24 50.06 3,637.48 AGDEN PARISH MEETING 6.95 1,202.76 8.10 1,403.21 9.26 1,603.67 10.42 1,804.13 12.74 2,205.05 15.05 2,605.96 17.37 3,006.89 20.84 3,608.26 ALDERLEY EDGE PARISH COUNCIL 45.69 1,241.50 53.30 1,448.41 60.92 1,655.33 68.53 1,862.24 83.76 2,276.07 98.99 2,689.90 114.22 3,103.74 137.06 3,724.48 ALPRAHAM PARISH COUNCIL 18.20 1,214.01 21.23 1,416.34 24.27 1,618.68 27.30 1,821.01 33.37 2,225.68 39.43 2,630.34 45.50 3,035.02 54.60 3,642.02 ALSAGER TOWN COUNCIL 56.53 1,252.34 65.95 1,461.06 75.37 1,669.78 84.79 1,878.50 103.63 2,295.94 122.47 2,713.38 141.32 3,130.84 169.58 3,757.00 ARCLID PARISH COUNCIL 11.35
    [Show full text]
  • Knutsford Design Guide Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan
    Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Knutsford Design Guide Knutsford Neighbourhood Plan Acknowledgements Considerable assistance in the preparation of this Design Guide was received from Knutsford’s Town Clerk and its Town and Borough Councillors, Cheshire East’s Neighbourhood Plan Team and its Conservation Officers, as well as residents, landowners and their planning consultants in the Plan’s various Working Groups. Urban Imprint, Knutsford’s Neighbourhood Plan consultants, also advised on content and designed the final document. Knutsford Design Guide Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 5. Access and Circulation 8-11 8. Commercial and Office Developments 20-21 Knutsford as a Special Place Permeability of Developments - Accessibility Overall Objectives The Purpse of the Knutsford Design Guide Street Hierarchy Development of Allocated Employment Sites The Use of the Knutsford Design Guide Building a Sense of Community Landscaping of Allocated Employment Sites Parking and Servicing Building Design on Allocated Employment Sites 2. Objectives in Relation to Development 2-3 Travel, Transport and Broadband Design Guide Principles Safety and Security Overall Objectives Cheshire East Local Plan Allocated Sites 6. High Quality Design 12-15 9. Retail Development 22-23 Large-scale Sites (100 or more dwellings) Vernacular Design and Local Architectural Styles Retail Buildings in New Developments Small-scale Sites Character Assessment Shop-front Design in Conservation Areas Employment/Commercial Developments Contemporary and Distinctive Design General Potential Future Development Sites Eco-design Fascias Conservation Areas Self-build, Custom-build, Conversions and Extensions Signage Design Samples Windows Pollution Doorways 3. Landscape and Biodiversity 4-5 Utilities Blinds Protection and Enhancement Designing in Biodiversity and Sustainability 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire Directories
    A itG. THE POST OFFICE DIEECTORY CHESHIRE. WITH MAP ENGRAVED EXPRESSLY FOR THE WORK EDITED BYg^JE.«jyy.LY, M.A., F.S.S. A. J. KENNEDY " <'^? \ ^V28 BROWN STR2!:ET/'cs>,^ PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY KELLY AND CO., 61, GREAT QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS, W.C. BRANCH OFFICES: BIBHIKOHAH : BROAD STHSKT COIuniB. I SI^SFFIBLD: OBNTRAL CHAMBBRS HIGH STRSBT. VAKCHEBTBK : 38, BnOWK STKBBT. MDCCCLXXVIII. ' { ? FIFTEEN SHILLINGS. INDEX TO THE POST OFFICE CHESHIEE DIRECTOEY. PAOK FACE rton 11 BlckOTton .17 Carrington 97 Cuddlngton, see Weaver- ctoo, »e< Wearorbaui.,.. 376 Blokley, see Malpae 244 CaHtle Norlhwloh, see ham 375 Acton Orange, see Dares- Bldnton-cum-Ford 38 Northwioh 275 Curzon Park, see Cliester.. 106 • SJW* 187 Birehee, see Gt. Budworth 89 Caiifrhall,«fe Backford.. 30 Daoebridgu St. PauPs, see AOIInglon ...^ 12 Birkenhead 3l>IChadklrk, sec llomiley .. 296 Northwlch 275 AdfWood,MeCheadle .... 100 Birtlea, see ITeatbury 288 Cheadlo 97 Darcsbury 166 a2(l«n,<eeBolUagtan(jiear Blackden, see tioostrey- Cheadle Bulkcley, see Daruhall, see Over 281 .^«inch*m) 79 cum-Barnshaw 191 Chcadle 08 Davenham 168 AMOtt, see Malpas 244 Blacon-cum-Crabwall 77 Cbeadio Kealh.see Cheadle 90 Davenport.seeAstbury.. 26 AOTM. sw Tuehlngham .. 370 Blakenhall, seeWybunbury 392 CheadtcHulmcseeChcadle 98 Deane Kow, see Wilmelow 383 AiettttWW,»e« Moreton .. 2t$ Bollln Fee, seeWllmslow.. SftJ Choadlo Moseley, see Dolamere 170 ^^*>y'• .• 13 Bollinffton nr. Altrlncham. 79 Cheadle , 98 DUIey 171 AlSen^y mwejsee Alderley 13 Bollingtoa nr. Prestbury .. 77 CheoklcT - cum -•VVrlnehlU, Dleley Stanley 171 Aldertef-^lfether 13 Booth Lane Head, see see DoddlDgton 172 Dodcott, see Burley Dam.. 94 AMerler--OTer 13 Klworth 185 Chelford 100 Doddington 172 Aldersey.setfCoddington.
    [Show full text]
  • The Peak District N Orihern Counties Annual Report for 1964
    ra L ~ELSON Si., The Peak District and · N orihern Counties · FOOTPATHS PRESERVATION SOCIETY ----------- 1894-1964 ----··-- ---- . -· Annual Report for 1964 THE PEAK DISTRICT AND NORTHERN COUNTIES FOOTPATHS PRESERVATION SOCIETY-1964 Founded in 1894 President : F. S. H. HEAD, Ph.D., D.Sc. Vice-Presidents : The Rt. Hon. LORD CHORLEY, M.A:~ J.P. P. DALEY F. HOWARD A. J. MOON, B.A. (Cantab.) A. SMlrrH H. E. WILD COUNCIL Elected Members : Dr. F. S. H. Head (Chairman) E. E. Ambler (Vice-Chairman) Dr. A. J. Ba.tJeman H. Gilliat A. Milner Dr, W. F. Beech J. - H. Holness Miss B. Rowland D. T. Berwick H. Kring E. E. Stubbs J. W. Dutterworth L. G. Meadowcroft W . Whalley K. E. Bracewell Miss N. Melior Mrs. Wi!lson Footpaths Inspectors : N. Redford (Chief) G. R. Estill J. Pa.rso-ns J. Cookson A, E. Nash P. J. Thornton H. Dickinson Delegates from Affiliated Clubs and Societies: D. P. Bailey G. Femley J. Ogden J. G. Baker R. S. Frew C. Peacock F . Barlow C. Hargreaves W. B. Howie MTs. M. Barratt J. Harrison J. Pye Miss G. Berm Miss A. Hollows H. Sandler P. Bramwell E. F. Hawkridge P. Smith R. A. BrickeU J. B. J ohnston H. Thistlethwai.te S. Burgess D. Kefford J. Taylor Mrs. E. A. Evison T. H.· LancaOO.ire Mrs. J. E. Wan.t A. D. Baton F. R. Mason Miss J. Ward-Oldham H. Cook Mrs. a. Matthews J. Willison D. Glendinni.ng GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE Dr. F. S. H. Head(Chairman) G. S. Cooper (Convenor) E.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly List of Planning Consultations 24.06.2021
    CONSERVATION CASES PROCESSED BY THE GARDENS TRUST 24.06.2021 This is a list of all the conservation consultations that The Gardens Trust has logged as receiving over the past week, consisting mainly, but not entirely, of planning applications. When assessing this list to see which cases CGTs may wish to engage with, it should be remembered that the GT will only be looking at a very small minority. SITE COUNTY SENT BY REFERENCE GT REF DATE GR PROPOSAL RESPONSE RECEIVED AD BY E ENGLAND Battlesden Park Bedfordshire Central CB/21/02605/VOC E21/0525 24/06/2021 II PLANNING APPLICATION Variation of 14/07/2021 Bedfordshire http://www.centralbedfo Conditions 2 and 22 of planning DC rdshire.gov.uk/planning- permission CB/16/01389/FULL register Installation of a single wind turbine with a maximum tip height of 143.5m (hub height 100m; rotor diameter of 87.0m), substation, hardstanding area, access track, underground cabling and associated infrastructure. The variation is to increase the rotor diameter of the wind turbine from 87.0m to 115.0m. This will also marginally increase the maximum turbine tip height from 143.5m to 147.0m. Land off A5 Checkley Wood Farm Watling Street Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9LG. MISCELLANEOUS Moggerhanger Park Bedfordshire Central CB/21/02832/FULL E21/0534 24/06/2021 II PLANNING APPLICATION (Re- 15/07/2021 Bedfordshire http://www.centralbedfo submission of planning permission DC rdshire.gov.uk/planning- CB/20/04680/FULL) To change size and register shape of horse exercise/ménage area from 20 by 40 metres to 30 by 40 metres and rotated 90 degrees from current approved position for private noncommercial use.
    [Show full text]
  • CHESHIRE. [ KELLY's
    4 CHESHIRE. [ KELLY's Leftwich Over Little N eston Raby Little Budworth Rudheath Little Sutton Saughall Massey Little Leigh Spruston Lower Bedington Storeton Lostock Gralam Stanthorne Moreton Thingwell Marbury \V~>aver, or Weever Ness Thornton Hough Mars ton Weaverham-cum-Mitton Netherpool Thurstru1ton Marton Wharton Overpool Upton, or Overchurch Middlewich Whatcroft Pens by West Kirby Moulton Wimboldslev• Poulton-cum-Spittle Whithy Nether Peover Wine ham Prenton Willasten Newton Winnington Paddington Woodchurch Northwich Witton-cum-Twambrooks Oakmere The following is a list of the hundreds, with the places contained in each:- Runcorn Union. Hundred of Ilroxton (Higher division).-Aldersey, Ald­ .Acton Grange Kingswood ford, Barton, IJickerton, Broxton, Bulkeley, Burwardsley, .Alvanley Manley .Antrobus Moore Caldecott, Carden, Cholmondeley, Chow'ley, Churton-by­ Appleton, or Hull & Appleton Newton-by-Daresbury Alford, Churton-by-Farndon, Clutton, Coddington, Crewe, Aston-by-Sutton Newton-by-Frodsham Egerton, Farndon, Grafton, Handley, Harthill, Horton-by­ Aston Grange N orley Malpas, Kingsmarsh, Stretton and Tilston. Bartington N orton Hundred of Broxton (Lower division).-Ilache, Buerton, Clifton, or Rocksavage Preston on the Hill Caughall or Coughalll, Christleton, Churton Heath or Crowley Runcorn Bruera, Cotton Abbotts, Cotton Edmunds, Doddleston, Daresbury Seven Oaks Eaton, Eccleston, Edgerley, Foulk Stapleford, Goulbourn Dutton Stockham Bellow, Goldbourn David, Great Boughton, Hatton, Hoole, Frodsham Stretton Huntington, Huxley, Lea
    [Show full text]
  • Pickmere to Agden and Hulseheath
    High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | MA03 MA03: Pickmere to Agden and Hulseheath High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H6 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report MA03: Pickmere to Agden and Hulseheath H6 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • (CGR) 2019: Electorate Forecasts Technical Report
    Cheshire East CGR electorate forecasts technical report V9 (7th August 2019) Cheshire East Council Community Governance Review (CGR) 2019: electorate forecasts technical report 1. Introduction As part of Cheshire East Council’s Community Governance Review (CGR), it is necessary to produce forecasts of the Borough’s future electorate for parishes and other small administrative areas. The main rationale for producing these forecasts is to assess how the size and geographical distribution of electors is likely to change in the coming years, so that electors can be fairly distributed between councillors. For example, housing developments can result in some small areas seeing much faster population and electorate growth than others – and hence the electors in these areas will be increasingly under-represented unless there is a change in electoral boundaries or the number of assigned councillors. Similarly, councillors representing areas of high population and electorate growth may become increasingly over-burdened unless boundaries or councillors numbers are revised. CGR and electorate guidance produced by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE)1 set out the requirements for these forecasts. In addition, Cheshire West & Chester Council recently (in 2017) carried out an electoral review of its council wards, which included electorate forecasts. Cheshire West & Chester produced a report on its methodology2, which the LGBCE reviewed and considered fit for purpose. Cheshire East Council has now produced its initial CGR forecasts, which take account of the LGBCE guidance and are based on Cheshire West & Chester’s approach.3 This technical report sets out Cheshire East’s methodology and the main results. The forecasts, and this report, were prepared by the Council’s Strategic Planning Team.
    [Show full text]