DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS Pipeline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS Pipeline Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS pipeline PL 153 Gjøa Vega Gas export Power from shore Oil export November 2006 PL 153 Gjøa Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS pipeline November 2006 Standard Information Sheet Project name: Gjøa to FLAGS Gas Export Pipeline DTI Project reference: D/3325/2006 Type of project: Field Development Undertaker Name: Statoil ASA Address: Statoil ASA N-4035 Stavanger Norway Licensees/Owners: RWE Dea Norge AS 8% A/S Norske Shell 12% Statoil ASA 20% Petoro AS 30% Gaz de France Norge AS 30% Short description: Statoil are proposing to install a new 28” (ID) gas export pipeline between the Gjøa SEMI and FLAGS, as part of the Gjøa project. The new export pipeline will be connected to a new Gjøa semi-submersible platform via two 12” risers. The pipeline will be connected to FLAGS at the Tampen Link connection, via a new Hot Tap Tee-piece. All connections at Gjøa and at FLAGS will be stabilised using gravel and rock and will be fitted with protective structures. Dates Anticipated commencement May 2007 of works: Date and reference number Not applicable of any earlier Statement related to this project: Significant environmental Physical Presence of Vessels impacts identified: Anchoring of vessels during pipeline Installation Pipeline installation Physical presence of the pipeline and subsea structures Emissions from anodes Accidental spills of diesel Statement Prepared By: Statoil ASA BMT Cordah Limited, Aberdeen i PL 153 Gjøa Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS pipeline November 2006 This page has been intentionally left blank ii PL 153 Gjøa Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS pipeline November 2006 Abbreviations Al Aluminium ALARP As Low As Reasonably Practicable BOD Biological Oxygen Demand BSI British Standards Institute CEFAS Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science CH4 Methane CPR Continuous Plankton Recorder CO Carbon monoxide CO2 Carbon dioxide cSAC Candidate Special Area of Conservation dB decibels DP Dynamically Positioned DEFRA Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DETR Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions dSAC Draft Special Area of Conservation DSV Dive Support Vessel DTI Department of Trade and Industry DWT Dead weight tonnage EAC Environmental Action Concentrations EC European Community EEC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EQS Environmental Quality Standards ERA Environmental Risk Assessment ES Environmental Statement EU European Union EWD European Wildlife Division FDP Field Development Plan FLAGS Far North Liquids and Gas System FRS Fisheries Research Services GPS Global Positioning System HAB Harmful Algal Blooms HTT Hot Tap Tee-piece Hz hertz ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Seas ISO International Standard Organisation JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee km kilometre m metres MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships MCA Maritime Coastguard Agency MDAC Methane-Derived Authigenic Carbonate MoD Ministry of Defence MPE Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (Norwegian) m/s Metres per Second NAO North Atlantic Oscillation NFFO National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisations nm Nautical mile NOx Nitrogen oxides N2O Nitrogen dioxide NSTF North Sea Task Force OD Overall Diameter iii PL 153 Gjøa Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS pipeline November 2006 OSIS Oil Spill Information System OSPAR Oslo and Paris Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic OVI Offshore Vulnerability index PDO Plan for Development and Operation of a petroleum deposit PIO Plan for installation and operation of facilities for transport and utilisation of petroleum PL Production licence PLEM Pipeline End Manifold ppm Parts per million PWA Pipeline Work Authorisation RIA regional impact assessment ROV Remotely Operated Vehicle RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds SAC Special Area of Conservation SAST Seabirds at Sea Team SCANS Small Cetacean Abundance in the North Sea (survey) SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SEERAD Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department SEPA Scottish Environmental Protection Agency SFF Scottish Fishermen’s Federation SFLL Statfjord Late Life SMRU Sea Mammal Research Unit SMSS super martensitic stainless steel SNH Scottish Natural Heritage SOPEP Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plans SoS Secretary of State for Trade and Industry UKCS United Kingdom Continental Shelf UKDMAP United Kingdom Digital Map UKOOA United Kingdom Offshore Operators Association VOC Volatile Organic Compounds WWF World Wildlife Fund Zn Zinc iv PL 153 Gjøa Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS pipeline November 2006 Contents Standard Information Sheet.........................................................................................................................i Abbreviations...............................................................................................................................................iii Contents....................................................................................................................................................... v 1 Non-Technical Summary...............................................................................................................1-1 1.1 The Project ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 The Existing Environment ..................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Significant Risks and Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Conclusions........................................................................................................................................................... 1-6 2 Introduction....................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 The Gjøa Field and the Background to the Gjøa to FLAGS Gas Export Pipeline ............................................... 2-1 2.2 Plans for Development and Transport from the Gjøa Field and Treaties between the United Kingdom and Norway .................................................................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 The Purpose of the Environmental Impact Assessment ...................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Legislative EIA Requirements............................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4.1 International Legislation 2-2 2.4.2 Norwegian Legislation 2-3 2.4.3 UK Legislation 2-3 2.5 The Relationship between UK and Norwegian Legislation and formal Requirements for EIA/ES Documentation ...................................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.5.1 Environmental Impact Assessment Programme 2-3 2.5.2 Regional and Strategic Impact Assessments 2-4 2.5.3 Contents and Structure of the EIA Documents 2-6 2.6 The Impact Assessment Process for the British and Norwegian Authorities....................................................... 2-6 2.7 Necessary Approvals/Applications, Consents and Information Requirements in Addition to PIO/PWA............. 2-7 3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME.................................................3-1 3.1 Consultation Process ............................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Concerns and Issues ............................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.3 Scope of the Environmental Assessment............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.4 Methodology – Environmental Assessment ......................................................................................................... 3-2 3.5 Background Documents........................................................................................................................................ 3-4 v PL 153 Gjøa Environmental Statement for the Gjøa to FLAGS pipeline November 2006 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Gjøa gas export solutions ..................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Gas Production at Gjøa 4-2 4.2 Gjøa to FLAGS gas export pipeline ...................................................................................................................... 4-2 4.3 Description for the selected Gjøa to FLAGS gas export pipeline......................................................................... 4-3 4.3.1 Site Survey 4-3 4.3.2 Crossings 4-4 4.3.3 Pipeline Installation 4-5 4.3.4 Corrosion Protection 4-6 4.3.5 Structures, Tie-Ins and Connection Operations 4-7 4.3.6 Leak testing and Dewatering operations 4-9 4.3.7 Emissions during pipeline installation 4-10 4.4 Operational Phase ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statfjord: Norway's Drive to Maximise Recovery Rates from Her Mature Fields
    Statfjord: Norway’s drive to maximise recovery rates from her mature fields In the oil and gas industry today, 70 per cent of the world's oil reserves are located in mature fields – assets where production has reached its peak and has started to decline. As things stand that accounts for in excess of 63 million barrels-worth of oil production per day. Nowhere are the challenges presented by mature fields more acutely felt than on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS), where the majority of the 69 fields in production today are classified as mature. In 2001, production on the NCS reached a peak of 3.4 million barrels per day. As of January 2013, Norwegian assets were producing only 1.4 million barrels of oil per day – roughly a 5 per cent year-on-year decrease over a 12 year period. Oil hunger Norway is reliant on and addicted to oil. The marginal tax rate on net profits within the petroleum sector is 78 per cent and in 2012, 30 per cent of total State revenue was derived from the hydrocarbon industry. In Q2 2013, crude oil and natural gas accounted for 41 per cent of all Norwegian exports and 35 per cent of the growth in Norway’s economy could be directly attributed to oil activity. The country’s oil fund is the world’s largest at NOK 4.52 trillion ($750 billion) and is set to grow by a further 50 per cent by 2020. The oil and gas industry dwarfs every other sector in the national economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Carbon Pricing: Case Studies from Company Experience
    TECHNICAL NOTE 9 | JANUARY 2015 Preparing for Carbon Pricing Case Studies from Company Experience: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Acknowledgments and Methodology This Technical Note was prepared for the PMR Secretariat by Janet Peace, Tim Juliani, Anthony Mansell, and Jason Ye (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions—C2ES), with input and supervision from Pierre Guigon and Sarah Moyer (PMR Secretariat). The note comprises case studies with three companies: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). All three have operated in jurisdictions where carbon emissions are regulated. This note captures their experiences and lessons learned preparing for and operating under policies that price carbon emissions. The following information sources were used during the research for these case studies: 1. Interviews conducted between February and October 2014 with current and former employees who had first-hand knowledge of these companies’ activities related to preparing for and operating under carbon pricing regulation. 2. Publicly available resources, including corporate sustainability reports, annual reports, and Carbon Disclosure Project responses. 3. Internal company review of the draft case studies. 4. C2ES’s history of engagement with corporations on carbon pricing policies. Early insights from this research were presented at a business-government dialogue co-hosted by the PMR, the International Finance Corporation, and the Business-PMR of the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) in Cologne, Germany, in May 2014. Feedback from that event has also been incorporated into the final version. We would like to acknowledge experts at Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)—among whom Laurel Green, David Hone, Sue Lacey and Neil Marshman—for their collaboration and for sharing insights during the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Eddy-Driven Recirculation of Atlantic Water in Fram Strait
    PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER Eddy-driven recirculation of Atlantic Water in Fram Strait 10.1002/2016GL068323 Tore Hattermann1,2, Pål Erik Isachsen3,4, Wilken-Jon von Appen2, Jon Albretsen5, and Arild Sundfjord6 Key Points: 1Akvaplan-niva AS, High North Research Centre, Tromsø, Norway, 2Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and • fl Seasonally varying eddy-mean ow 3 4 interaction controls recirculation of Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway, Institute of Geosciences, 5 6 Atlantic Water in Fram Strait University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, Institute for Marine Research, Bergen, Norway, Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway • The bulk recirculation occurs in a cyclonic gyre around the Molloy Hole at 80 degrees north Abstract Eddy-resolving regional ocean model results in conjunction with synthetic float trajectories and • A colder westward current south of observations provide new insights into the recirculation of the Atlantic Water (AW) in Fram Strait that 79 degrees north relates to the Greenland Sea Gyre, not removing significantly impacts the redistribution of oceanic heat between the Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean. The Atlantic Water from the slope current simulations confirm the existence of a cyclonic gyre around the Molloy Hole near 80°N, suggesting that most of the AW within the West Spitsbergen Current recirculates there, while colder AW recirculates in a Supporting Information: westward mean flow south of 79°N that primarily relates to the eastern rim of the Greenland Sea Gyre. The • Supporting Information S1 fraction of waters recirculating in the northern branch roughly doubles during winter, coinciding with a • Movie S1 seasonal increase of eddy activity along the Yermak Plateau slope that also facilitates subduction of AW Correspondence to: beneath the ice edge in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Mongstad Mongstad
    North Sea Sweden Project Profile Norway Mongstad Mongstad The Mongstad facilities in western Norway have been in operation since the mid-1970’s and today encompass a refinery, a crude oil terminal, a technical development center and a wet gas processing factory. Throughout decades of expansion and modernization, ABB has kept pace with Mongstad’s dynamic process control and electrification requirements by providing advanced, flexible solutions designed to meet both current and future needs. A key link in the Norwegian oil supply chain OilUpstream & andGas Midstream Comprising Norway’s largest oil refinery, a high-traffic shipping port and storage facilities for around one-third of the crude oil produced by the Norwegian state, Mongstad is vital to the Norwegian oil industry. Keeping the oil flowing in and out of Mongstad in a safe, efficient and environmental manner takes state-of-the-art technology, including electric power and process Facts about Mongstad: automation systems from ABB. ABB is the leading supplier of integrated The oil refinery is the largest of its kind electrotechnical solutions to the oil and gas industry, and has provided in Norway with an annual capacity of innovative solutions to the Mongstad facilities for over 30 years. 10 million tons of crude. It is owned by By consistently providing reliable, high performance process control capabilities Mongstad Refining (79% StatoilHydro to Mongstad, the scope of ABB automation technology has steadily increased. and 21% Shell). Today, ABB automation technology at Mongstad encompasses: The crude oil terminal provides inter- 2,700 I/O boards with over 25,000 I/O´s 4 INFINET rings mediate storage of more than 1/3 of 150 redundant controllers distributed 13 HMI servers, 33 dual-VDU consoles over 17 equipment outstations all crude oil produced on the Norwegian 500 process graphics continental shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary File For: Blix A.S. 2016. on Roald Amundsen's Scientific Achievements. Polar Research 35. Correspondence: AAB Bu
    Supplementary file for: Blix A.S. 2016. On Roald Amundsen’s scientific achievements. Polar Research 35. Correspondence: AAB Building, Institute of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Selected publications from the Gjøa expedition not cited in the text Geelmuyden H. 1932. Astronomy. The scientific results of the Norwegian Arctic expedition in the Gjøa 1903-1906. Geofysiske Publikasjoner 6(2), 23-27. Graarud A. 1932. Meteorology. The scientific results of the Norwegian Arctic expedition in the Gjøa 1903-1906. Geofysiske Publikasjoner 6(3), 31-131. Graarud A. & Russeltvedt N. 1926. Die Erdmagnetischen Beobachtungen der Gjöa-Expedition 1903- 1906. (Geomagnetic observations of the Gjøa expedition, 1903-06.) The scientific results of the Norwegian Arctic expedition in the Gjøa 1903-1906. Geofysiske Publikasjoner 3(8), 3-14. Holtedahl O. 1912. On some Ordovician fossils from Boothia Felix and King William Land, collected during the Norwegian expedition of the Gjøa, Captain Amundsen, through the North- west Passage. Videnskapsselskapets Skrifter 1, Matematisk–Naturvidenskabelig Klasse 9. Kristiania (Oslo): Jacob Dybwad. Lind J. 1910. Fungi (Micromycetes) collected in Arctic North America (King William Land, King Point and Herschell Isl.) by the Gjöa expedition under Captain Roald Amundsen 1904-1906. Videnskabs-Selskabets Skrifter 1. Mathematisk–Naturvidenskabelig Klasse 9. Christiania (Oslo): Jacob Dybwad. Lynge B. 1921. Lichens from the Gjøa expedition. Videnskabs-Selskabets Skrifter 1. Mathematisk– Naturvidenskabelig Klasse 15. Christiania (Oslo): Jacob Dybwad. Ostenfeld C.H. 1910. Vascular plants collected in Arctic North America (King William Land, King Point and Herschell Isl.) by the Gjöa expedition under Captain Roald Amundsen 1904-1906.
    [Show full text]
  • JCS Newsletter – Issue 23 · Summer 2017
    JCS 2017(EM) Quark2017.qxp_Layout 2 14/08/2017 16:43 Page 1 The James Caird Society Newsletter Issue 23 · Summer 2017 The draughtsmanship behind a legend Read the story of the James Caird that lies behind the one we all know ... (Page 4/5) Registered Charity No. 1044864 JCS 2017(EM) Quark2017.qxp_Layout 2 14/08/2017 16:43 Page 2 James Caird Society news and events New Chairman Friday 17 November This year sees a new Chairman of the The AGM will be held at James Caird Society. At the November 5.45pm in the AGM Rear Admiral Nick Lambert will James Caird Hall take over from Admiral Sir James at Dulwich College Perowne KBE who has been an and will include the inspirational chairman since 2006, appointment of a new overseeing several major JCS Society Chairman landmarks including the Nimrod Ball and, The lecture will begin at most recently in 2016, a series of 7pm in the Great Hall. magnificent events to celebrate the The speaker will be Centenary of the Endurance Expedition. Geir Klover, Director of the We wish James well and hope we will still Fram Museum Oslo, who see him at the Lecture/Dinner evenings. will talk about Amundsen Nick Lambert joined the Royal Navy as Dinner will be served aseamaninMarch1977,subsequently afterwards gaining an honours degree in Geography at the University of Durham in 1983. He spent much time at sea, including on HM ships Birmingham, Ark Royal, Cardiff, Meetings in 2018 and has commanded HMS Brazen and HMS Newcastle. May Dinner He was captain of the ice patrol ship Endurance from 2005 to 2007, deploying Friday 11 May for two deeply rewarding seasons in Antarctica, after which he commanded Task Force 158 in the North Arabian Gulf, tasked with the protection of Iraq’s AGM and dinner economically vital offshore oil infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • CCS from the Gas-Fired Power Station at Kårstø? a Commercial Analysis1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics CCS from the gas-fired power station at Kårstø? A commercial analysis1 by Petter Osmundsen* and Magne Emhjellen** * University of Stavanger ** Petoro AS Summary The article presents a commercial investment analysis of the carbon capture project at the Kårstø gas processing plant in south-western Norway. We update an earlier analysis and critically review the methods used including those applied for cost estimating. Our conclusion is that carbon capture and storage (CCS) at Kårstø would be a very unprofitable climate measure with poor cost efficiency. It would require more than USD 1.7 billion2 in subsidies, or in excess of USD 133 million per year. That corresponds to a subsidy of roughly USD 0.1 per kilowatt-hour on the power station s electricity output. The cost per tonne of carbon emissions abated is about USD 333, which is about 20 times the international carbon emission allowance price and many times higher than alternative domestic climate measures. * Petter Osmundsen, department of industrial economics and risk management, University of Stavanger, NO-4036 Stavanger, Norway E-mail: [email protected], home page: http://www5.uis.no/kompetansekatalog/visCV.aspx?ID=08643&sprak=BOKMAL ** Magne Emhjellen, Petoro AS, P O Box 300 Sentrum, NO- 4002 Stavanger, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 1 Thanks are due to Johan Gjærum, Per Ivar Gjærum, Kåre Petter Hagen and Knut Einar Rosendahl for constructive comments. We would also like to thank a number of specialists in business and the civil service for useful comments and proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception and Commemoration of William Speirs Bruce Are, I Suggest, Part
    The University of Edinburgh School of Geosciences Institute of Geography A SCOT OF THE ANTARCTIC: THE RECEPTION AND COMMEMORATION OF WILLIAM SPEIRS BRUCE M.Sc. by Research in Geography Innes M. Keighren 12 September 2003 Declaration of originality I hereby declare that this dissertation has been composed by me and is based on my own work. 12 September 2003 ii Abstract 2002–2004 marks the centenary of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Led by the Scots naturalist and oceanographer William Speirs Bruce (1867–1921), the Expedition, a two-year exploration of the Weddell Sea, was an exercise in scientific accumulation, rather than territorial acquisition. Distinct in its focus from that of other expeditions undertaken during the ‘Heroic Age’ of polar exploration, the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition, and Bruce in particular, were subject to a distinct press interpretation. From an examination of contemporary newspaper reports, this thesis traces the popular reception of Bruce—revealing how geographies of reporting and of reading engendered locally particular understandings of him. Inspired, too, by recent work in the history of science outlining the constitutive significance of place, this study considers the influence of certain important spaces—venues of collection, analysis, and display—on the conception, communication, and reception of Bruce’s polar knowledge. Finally, from the perspective afforded by the centenary of his Scottish National Antarctic Expedition, this paper illustrates how space and place have conspired, also, to direct Bruce’s ‘commemorative trajectory’—to define the ways in which, and by whom, Bruce has been remembered since his death. iii Acknowledgements For their advice, assistance, and encouragement during the research and writing of this thesis I should like to thank Michael Bolik (University of Dundee); Margaret Deacon (Southampton Oceanography Centre); Graham Durant (Hunterian Museum); Narve Fulsås (University of Tromsø); Stanley K.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncertainty Analysis of Emissions from the Statoil Mongstad Oil Refinery
    25th International North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop, Oslo, Norway, 16-19 October 2007 Uncertainty analysis of emissions from the Statoil Mongstad oil refinery Kjell-Eivind Frøysa1, Anne Lise Hopland Vågenes2, Bernhard Sørli2 and Helge Jørgenvik2 1Christian Michelsen Research AS, Box 6031 Postterminalen, N-5892 Bergen, Norway. 2Statoil Mongstad, 5954 Mongstad, Norway ABSTRACT In new European and national legislations, there is increased focus on the reporting of the emmissions related to greenhouse gases from process plants. This includes reporting and documentation of uncertainty in the reported emmissions, in addition to specific uncertainty limits depending on the type of emission and type of measurement regime. In a process plant like the Statoil Mongstad oil raffinery, there may be a huge number of measurement points for mass flow. These measured mass flow rates have to be added in order to obtain the total emission for a given source. Typically, orifice plates are used at many of the measurement points. These orifice plate meters are ususally not equipped with individual densitometers. In stead, they are pressure and temperature corrected from a common upstream densitometer. This will give correllations between the individual flow meters. In the present paper, the flow meter set-up for Statoil Mongstad will be briefly addressed. thereafter, an uncertainty model suitable for the CO2 emission from the Statoil Mongstad oil raffinery will be presented, included a practically method for handling the partial correllation between the uncertainty of the various flow meters. This model will comply with the ISO 5168 for measurement uncertainty. Various uncertainty contributions will be reviewed, in order to work out an uncertainty budget for the specific emission sources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century Ago : the Nansen Drift Fridtjof Nansen Wanted to Reach the Pole by Having His Boat Caught in the Ice and Letting Her Drift
    www.taraexpeditions.org A century ago : the Nansen drift Fridtjof Nansen wanted to reach the pole by having his boat caught in the ice and letting her drift. He will miss his objective by some 800 km but will bring back all his crew despite three very harsh wintering. In 1895, a Norwegian succeeded in com- pleting the fi rst Arctic drift on the Fram, the boat that is Tara’s ancestor. Prolonged for three long polar winters, the mission, however, was not able to reach the pole. Fridtjof Nansen was 32 years old when he Her rounded shapes should prevent the ice from March 1895, Nansen decides to leave the boat had begun on the journey. During the summer, started on his Arctic drift. His aim was to get crushing her, but it is especially her sturdiness and go with a companion to the North Pole the pack ice becomes more and more impracti- as close to the North pole as possible. It is after that enables her to resist to the pack ice grip : the by sledge. Th e two men are equipped with cable but at the end of August, they accost on having discovered in the south west of Green- hull is more than 80 centimetres thick. light kayaks and take 630 kg of equipment with land on the Franz-Joseph archipelago. Th ey re- land the remains of a vessel crushed by the ice, With a crew of 13 men, Nansen leaves Oslo them. After 23 days on the go, they give up on solve to spend their third Arctic winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Fridtjof Nansen, One of Norway's Most Famous Sons
    Paraplegia 25 (1987) 27-31 © 1987 International Medical Society of Paraplegia FridtjofNansen: Neuro-anatomical Discoveries, Arctic Explorations, and Humanitarian Deeds Abrahatn Ohry, M.D.t and Karin Ohry-Kossoy, M.A. t Neurological Rehabilitation Department, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel 'Man wants to know, and when he ceases to do so, he is no longer a man' F. Nansen The IMSOP Meeting took place in Oslo on the 125th anniversary of Nansen's birth. Apart from his Arctic explorations, his political and humanitarian activities, he first pointed out that the posterior root fibres divide on entering the spinal cord into ascending and descending branches. This article is dedicated to the memory of a great Norwegian. The 1986 IMSOP Meeting in Oslo took place at the time of the 125th anniver­ sary of the birth of Fridtjof Nansen, one of Norway's most famous sons. He was an extremely gifted man with lofty ideals who left an enduring mark in all the fields in which he was active. Our own particular interest in him, however, con­ centrates on his neuro-anatomical discoveries (Christensen, 1961; Vogt, 1961). Nansen was born in Norway in 1861. His family was of distinguished Danish origin. The orientations of his adult life were already clearly apparent during his childhood: at school he excelled in the sciences and in drawing, but also spent much time outdoors, skiing and exploring nature. In 1880 Nansen became a zoology student at the University of Christiania in Oslo, which enabled him to combine his interest in science with his love for outdoor life.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Petroleum Exploitation and Environmental Protection: the International and Norwegian Response
    Comments OFFSHORE PETROLEUM EXPLOITATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: THE INTERNATIONAL AND NORWEGIAN RESPONSE Degradation of the marine environment inevitably accompa- nies the pursuit of offshore hydrocarbons. This Comment first ex- amines the international legal regime which establishes both jurisdictionalrights of exploitation and the coastal States' obli- gation to mitigate concomitant environmental harms. The writer then focuses on a single coastal State, Norway, to study a domes- tic response to the conflicting needs of offshore exploitation and environmental protection. Issues attending offshore petroleum exploitation confront the world community as it progresses toward a new international law of the sea.' Alternative energy sources must be developed,2 yet 1. By the end of the century, offshore oil could account for nearly half of the annual world production of some seventy billion barrels. R. HALumAN, TowARDs AN ENVIRoNmENTALLY SouND LAw OF THE SEA 3 (1974). Therefore, according to one author, the value of offshore petroleum and gas production will exceed that of the world's fish catch to become the most important marine resource. That being so, one of the problems which arises is to determine how the different interests which States, and the international community as a whole, have in the marine environment, are to be accommodated in a legal order. Hardy, Offshore Development and Marine Pollution, 1 OCEAN DEv. & INT'L L 239, 240 (1973). See generally, NATIONAL PETROLEUM CouuNc, LAW OF THE SEA (1973). See Finlay & McKnight, Law of the Sea:t Its Impact on the InternationalEnergy Crisis,6 INT'L L. & POL'Y Bus. 639 (1974). 2. "It is estimated that by 1990 the free world will use as much as 100 million barrels of oil ..
    [Show full text]