DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Concession Contract Glory Hole Concession Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim Concession Contract Glory Hole Concession Area New Melones Lake Concession Prospectus Interim Concession Contract Glory Hole Concession Area Interim Concession Contract Glory Hole Concession Area New Melones Lake Part 7.20 – Interim Concessions Contract. Interim Concession Contract 1 New Melones Lake Concession Prospectus Interim Concession Contract Identification of The Parties Identification of The Parties This Interim Concession Contract is made and entered into by and between the United States of America, acting, through the Area Manager, Central California Area Office of the Mid Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation (as delegated), hereinafter referred to as “Reclamation” and Shasta Lake Resorts (SLR), a California limited partnership, hereinafter referred to as the “Concession Contractor”; together, Reclamation and the Concession Contractor to be referred to as “the Parties”. Witnesseth: Whereas, the United States has withdrawn and acquired certain lands for the New Melones Unit; Central Valley Project (New Melones Project), on the Stanislaus River, California, and Reclamation is operating the New Melones Project including said lands; and Whereas,, Reclamation has determined that certain New Melones Project facilities and services are necessary and appropriate for the public use and enjoyment, and has designated the Glory Hole Concession Area for this purpose, and the Concession Contractor is willing to provide such services; and Whereas,, the Concession Contractor wishes to utilize a portion of said lands within the Glory Hole Concession Area for the location, construction, operation and maintenance of the New Melones Lake Marina, a public marina and associated recreation use facilities and developments. Whereas,, Reclamation is willing to allow the Concession Contractor a reasonable opportunity to realize a profit on the operations conducted within Glory Hole Concession Area; and Whereas,, the existing Concession Contract is expiring on the 31st of December 2012, and a continuation of concession services is desired by Reclamation; and Whereas,, the Concession Contractor’s services and facilities and temporary use of existing Reclamation Improvements during this interim contract will not be inconsistent with the requirements of Reclamation’s New Melones Project and will not interfere with the operation and responsibility of any and all entities associated with that Project; and Whereas,, Reclamation desires the Concession Contractor to maintain and operate these visitor services at reasonable rates as an independent contractor in conformity with all Applicable Laws and the terms of this Interim Concession Contract; and 2 Part 7.20 – Interim Concessions Contract. Interim Concession Contract New Melones Lake Concession Prospectus Interim Concession Contract Definitions Whereas,, Shasta Lake Resorts (SLR) is the existing Concession Contractor at Glory Hole Concession Area, operating as the New Melones Lake Marina pursuant to the July 2, 2010 Novation Agreement and Concession Agreement for New Melones Lake Marina, No. 6-LM-2004280, which expires on December 31, 2012; and Whereas,, Reclamation desires the Concession Contractor to conduct these visitor services in a manner that demonstrates sound public health, safety and environmental management, stewardship, and leadership; and Reclamation is willing to recognize SLR as the successor party to the “Prior Concession Agreement” provided SLR agrees to the terms and conditions set forth These paragraphs are here solely to have text that would go to a second page so that the header and footer would be visible in this Interim Concession Contract; and Now, Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in Reclamation Act of 1902, as amended and supplemented; Reclamation Project Act of 1939; Flood Control Act of December, 1944, as amended and supplemented; Flood Control Act of October, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) as amended and supplemented ; the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, as amended; Reclamation Recreation Management Act, Title XXVIII of Public Law 102-575; and other laws and policies that supplement and amend the acts, Reclamation and the Concession Contractor agree as follows: Definitions The following terms used in this Interim Concession Contract and the exhibits to this Interim Concession Contract will be defined, for the purposes of this Interim Concession Contract and exhibits, as set forth below. Definitions apply to both the singular and the plural forms of the defined terms: Applicable Laws – Federal, State and local laws governing the development, operation and maintenance of recreation facilities and services at New Melones Lake, including, but not limited to, the rules, regulations, and other requirements promulgated under those laws, whether now in force, or amended, enacted or promulgated in the future. Authorized Services – Those services not specifically required under the Interim Concession Contract, but requested by the Concession Contractor and approved by Reclamation, which facilitate providing additional public services and conveniences consistent with this Interim Concession Contract. Part 7.20 – Interim Concessions Contract. Interim Concession Contract 3 New Melones Lake Concession Prospectus Interim Concession Contract Definitions Assignment – Designation of Government land and facilities by the Government for use by the Concession Contractor in providing contractually required services during the term of this Interim Concession Contract. Such designation will continue until contract expiration, termination, or until otherwise withdrawn by the Government. This designation does not transfer ownership of the subject property. Best Management Practices – Policies and practices that apply the most current and advanced practicable means and technologies available to the Concession Contractor to undertake and maintain a superior level of environmental performance reasonable in light of the circumstances of the operations conducted under this Interim Concession Contract. Best Management Practices are expected to change from time to time as technology evolves. Catastrophic Hazard Deficiency – A condition or practice which could result in immediate and imminent danger of death or permanent disability, chronic or irreversible illness, major property or resource damage. Concession Contractor Improvement(s) – Fixed Assets provided by the Concession Contractor pursuant to the terms of this Interim Concession Contract with the written approval of Reclamation for the purposes of this Interim Concession Contract (including any Improvements made to Reclamation Improvements and Improvements made from funds in the Reserve Account for Facilities Improvement (RAFI)), during the term of the Interim Concession Contract, including buildings, Structures, Fixtures, equipment, and other Improvements affixed to the assigned lands in such a manner as to be a part of the realty. Because of their special circumstances, docks and other floating structures currently in place or that may be constructed by the Concession Contractor pursuant to the terms of this Interim Concession Contract are included in this category. Concession Contractor Improvements constructed affixed to the lands assigned to the Concession Contractor do not include any interest in the land upon which the Improvements are located. Additionally, a Concession Contractor Improvement does not include any interest in Personal Property of any kind including, but not limited to, vehicles, boats, houseboats or other objects, regardless of size, unless an item of Personal Property becomes a Fixture as defined in this Interim Concession Contract. Concession Contractor Improvements exclude site preparation work such as grading, cutting and filling of soil or rock. Contracting Officer – Shall mean the Regional Director of the Mid Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. Critical Hazard Deficiency -A condition or practice which could result in permanent partial disability, temporary total disability greater than 3 months, significant property or resource damage. 4 Part 7.20 – Interim Concessions Contract. Interim Concession Contract New Melones Lake Concession Prospectus Interim Concession Contract Definitions Day or days – Shall mean calendar days, unless the Contract shall specifically refer to business days which shall exclude weekends and federally recognized holidays. Exhibit or exhibits – Shall mean the various exhibits, which are attached to this Interim Concession Contract, each of which is hereby made a part of this concession contract. Federal Estate – Is the Federal land and water areas of the New Melones Project that are under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Franchise Fee / Franchise Fees – A payment to the Government that is considered a direct return upon consideration of the value to the Concession Contractor of the use, rights, and privileges granted by this Interim Concession Contract. Such value shall be based upon a reasonable opportunity for net profit in relation to capital invested and the obligations of this Interim Concession Contract. Fixed Assets – Are any Structures, Fixtures, or capital Improvements permanently attached to the Federal Estate. Fixtures – Manufactured items of property of an independent form and utility, necessary for the basic functioning of a Structure that are affixed to and considered to be part of the Structure as real property once installed (e.g., toilets, sinks, faucets, walk in refrigerators and freezers) . Fixtures do not include building materials until incorporated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seller Concessions - New York State Bar Association Clarifies Ethics Opinion Real Estate In-Depth April, 2010 by Edward I
    Seller Concessions - New York State Bar Association Clarifies Ethics Opinion Real Estate In-Depth April, 2010 By Edward I. Sumber, Board Counsel On December 15, 2009, an informal response was given by the New York State Bar Association’s Committee on Professional Ethics (Inquiry No. 43-09) in which the State Bar Association clarified circumstances in which a lawyer may ethically participate in a residential real estate transaction, when the Seller has agreed to increase the sales price “in an amount equivalent to the amount of the Seller’s concession”. This excellent response by Committee Chair, Roy D. Simon, will be helpful to many lawyers who have avoided any transaction involving a gross up of a contract price with an equivalent Seller concession. A "seller's concession" is simply a credit to be given to the purchasers at closing often applied to closing costs, repairs or other expenses of the purchaser. When it is a genuine credit, no gross-up of the transaction is applicable. For example, a Seller may agree to provide a seller's concession because the inspection report reveals that the roof requires replacement. The seller's concession referred to in the Bar Association opinion is one which is identical in amount to the gross-up of the purchase price and is intended to enable the purchasers to obtain greater financing for the transaction. The Seller continues to receive the same true sales price as was originally negotiated. Opinion 817 – 11/2/2007 In 2007, the New York State Bar Association’s Committee on Professional Ethics issued a formal Opinion (817) in which it essentially stated that participation by a lawyer in a real estate transaction that includes a “seller’s concession” with a “grossed up” sales price is prohibited unless: [A] The transaction is entirely lawful; [B] The gross up is disclosed in the transaction documents; and [C] No parties are misled to their detriment.
    [Show full text]
  • HPTE Summary of Concession Agreement
    SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE CONCESSION AGREEMENT January 24, 2014 1. General Rights and Obligations of the Concessionaire 1.1 The Concessionaire has agreed, as and when required by the Concession Agreement, to do the following: (a) The Phase 2 Work, which is comprised of the following: (i) Phase 2 Construction Work, which means all of the works (including design, construction, testing, defect rectification and works necessary for obtaining access to the Site) to be undertaken in accordance with the Concessionaire's Phase 2 Construction Work Proposals in order to fulfill the Phase 2 Construction Work Requirements set out in Schedule 5 to the Concession Agreement. This includes: (1) Constructing the Phase 2 Managed Lanes; (2) Reconstructing the Phase 2 GP Lanes; (3) The I-25 Initial Work Package, which is a package of work intended to address known deficiencies in the I-25 Bridge Decks with a view to protecting the structures below those decks; (4) Designing and constructing other improvements to the Phase 2 Corridor, including sound and retaining walls, a bikeway, dynamic messaging signs and intelligent transportation system improvements; and (ii) Installing and commissioning the Phase 2 ETCS. The Phase 2 Work includes the BRT elements referred to in the body of this Official Statement. (b) The Services, which means the operation, maintenance, and tolling of the Managed Lanes and US 36 GP Lanes, through the creation and implementation of Operations Management Plans, Operations Maintenance Plans, Safety Plans, and Communication and Marketing Plans (all to be approved by HPTE) to ensure that: (i) The Managed Lanes are available as required by the Concession Agreement; 1 \DE - 038248/000001 - 677443 v2 (ii) The Concessionaire is maintaining the design intention of the Maintained Elements to achieve their full working life; and (iii) The Maintained Elements are handed back to HPTE on the Expiration Date in a condition complying with the requirements of the Concession Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D-1 Master Concession Agreement
    SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP DRAFT DATED: JULY 15, 2014 MASTER CONCESSION AGREEMENT FOR THE LEASING AND DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT HOUSING (PHASE I) Between THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA and CONCESSIONAIRE a [State] [entity] Dated November [___], 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION .........................................................2 Section 1.1 Definitions....................................................................................................2 Section 1.2 General Rules of Construction .....................................................................7 ARTICLE II. TERM ...................................................................................................................8 Section 2.1 Term .............................................................................................................8 Section 2.2 Return of Premises .......................................................................................8 Section 2.3 Early Termination ........................................................................................8 ARTICLE III. CONTINUED OPERATIONS PERIOD; TURNOVER OF THE PROJECTS ...........................................................................................................9 Section 3.1 Continued Operations Period .......................................................................9 Section 3.2 Turnover of Operations ..............................................................................10 Section 3.3 Pre-Concession
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Gentrification Vs. Centrification: the Role of Nonprofits
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons MAIS Projects and Theses School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences Spring 6-14-2017 The aB ttle of Gentrification vs. Centrification: The role of nonprofits William Towey University of Washington - Tacoma Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_masters Recommended Citation Towey, William, "The aB ttle of Gentrification vs. Centrification: The or le of nonprofits" (2017). MAIS Projects and Theses. 51. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_masters/51 This Open Access (no embargo, no restriction) is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAIS Projects and Theses by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. The Battle of Gentrification vs. Centrification: The role of nonprofits William Towey A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies University of Washington 2017 Committee: Ruth Bernstein Charles Williams Jane Compson Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences ProQuest Number:10287372 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10287372 Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Evolution and Maturity
    2016 Engineering & Construction Conference June 15–17, 2016 The Westin Austin Downtown Austin, Texas Public-Private Partnerships: Evolution and Maturity Micah Bible Lucian Spatoliatore Senior Manager, M&A Transaction Partner, M&A Transaction Services Services Deloitte & Touche LLP Deloitte Tax LLP Todd Wilson Jim Ziglar, Jr. Managing Director, M&A Senior Manager Transaction Services Deloitte Transactions and Deloitte & Touche LLP Business Analytics LLP 9:45 – 10:45 a.m. Contents Overview of the Market for U.S. Public-Private Partnerships (P3s) Potential Tax Implications for Companies Investing In P3s Update on Accounting and Financial Reporting Q&A Session Overview of US Public- Private Partnerships (PPPs or P3s) PPP Definition Public-private partnerships (“PPP”s or “P3”s) are contractual relationships in which the public and private sector agree to share the risks and rewards associated with a public asset. There are many types of PPP structures, but most share the following characteristics: • Long-term contractual arrangement with some regulatory element • Not a full legal asset sale • Designed to secure value or control costs for the public sector • Private sector contractor accepts risks and responsibility for (some or all of) design, construction, financing, maintenance and operations • Public sector retains strategic control over service delivery, may retain certain risks that it is able to handle more efficiently than the private sector, and either cedes revenue generated from asset or makes payments for performance • Payment to the private sector either comes directly from the project (revenue risk), or is a performance-based payment from the government (availability payment) Range of Project Delivery / Procurement Models Traditional Approach, PPPs, and Asset Sale A PPP is a contractual relationship in which the public and private sector agree to share the risks and rewards associated with a public asset.
    [Show full text]
  • Concession Laws Assessment 2007/8
    EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONCESSION LAWS ASSESSMENT 2007/8 COVER ANALYSIS REPORT FINAL REPORT JULY 2008 INTRODUCTION Gide Loyrette Nouel ("GLN"/ "the Consultant")1 has been selected by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ("EBRD")2 to provide it with an evaluation of concession laws and legal framework applicable to public private partnership (PPP) in each of its countries of operations benchmarked against best international practice, in particular the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Privately Financed Infrastructure Projects adopted in 2000 (the "PFI Guide"). The PFI Guide is intended to be used by national authorities and legislative bodies when preparing new laws or reviewing the adequacy of existing laws and regulations. The 2007/8 concession laws assessment (the "Project") is part of the EBRD's efforts to improve the legal environment in its countries of operations. Through the Project, the EBRD aims to encourage, influence and provide guidance to policy and law makers, while developing the concessions and PPP related legal reform in the region. In addition to concession laws assessment the EBRD has undertaken similar evaluations in secured transactions, corporate governance, bankruptcy and securities markets. EBRD sector assessment projects concern legal areas that the EBRD considers essential for the investment climate and private sector development. The aim is to compare the legislation applicable in the above-mentioned areas to international standards and, in so doing, identify the reforms needed. The projects place an emphasis on the written legislation ("law on the books"), whereas its application (“effectiveness”) is measured by the use of other tools3. The purpose of this report is to present and analyse concession assessments results as well as the evolution from the past assessments.
    [Show full text]
  • Seller's Concession" and Iigrossed Up" Sale Price
    WESTCHESTER NEW YORK CITY 800 Westchester Ave 888 Seventh Ave. Ste.300 Suite S340 New York, NY 10106 Rye Brook, NY 10573 800-281-TITLE (8485) Tel: (914) 381-6700 Tel: (212) 432-3272 Fax:(914) 381-1313 Fax: 800-FAX-9396 http://www.judicialtitle.com Seller’s Concession – Danger to the Legal Profession? January 7, 2008 In 2006 a New Jersey Ethics Opinion disciplined the Buyer’s and Seller’s attorneys for participating in a real estate transaction which had a “Seller’s Concession” built into the purchase price. Despite the fact that full disclosure was made to the originating bank, the NJ Committee on Professional Ethics held that a lender acquiring the loan in the secondary market could be deceived. See N.J. Opinion 710. New York has now (11-2-07) issued a similar opinion. See Opinion 817. “Participation in residential real estate transactions that include a “seller’s concession” and “grossed up” sales price is prohibited unless the transaction is entirely lawful, the gross-up is disclosed in the transaction documents, and no parties are misled to their detriment.” NY Opinion 817. There is much room for interpretation in the opinion. What is meant by transaction documents? Must the deed contain a recital concerning the concession so that there is record notice? Would a bank relying on an appraisal, which, in turn, relied on a grossed-up purchase price of an adjoining property, be considered as a party misled to their detriment? What has always been a slippery slope is now a sheet of ice. In a market looking for solutions this could be a serious roadblock.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Public-Private Partnerships Core Toll Concessions Contract Guide
    Model Public-Private Partnership Core Toll Concession Contract Guide Model Public-Private Partnerships Core Toll Concessions Contract Guide September 2014 1 Model Public-Private Partnership Core Toll Concession Contract Guide Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Public-Private Partnerships ................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Contractual Terms of P3s ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 P3s, the Federal Highway Administration, and the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1.5 Objectives/Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Description of Chapter Topics ............................................................................................................... 6 1.7 Suggested Utilization of the Toll Concession Contracts Chapters ...................................................... 7 1.8 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • The Rising Value of Time and the Origin of Urban Gentrification
    The Rising Value of Time and the Origin of Urban Gentrification Yichen Su Working Paper 1913 Research Department https://doi.org/10.24149/wp1913 Working papers from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas are preliminary drafts circulated for professional comment. The views in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. The Rising Value of Time and the Origin of Urban Gentrification* Yichen Su† October 31, 2019 Abstract In recent decades, gentrification has transformed American central city neighborhoods. I estimate a spatial equilibrium model to show that the rising value of high-skilled workers’ time contributes to the gentrification of American central cities. I show that the increasing value of time raises the cost of commuting and exogenously increases the demand for central locations by high-skilled workers. While change in the value of time has a modest direct effect on gentrification of central cities, the effect is substantially magnified by endogenous amenity improvement driven by the changes in local skill mix. Keywords: Gentrification, Value of time, Amenities, Central cities JEL codes: J22, R13, J24 *I thank my advisors Luigi Pistaferri, Caroline Hoxby, and Rebecca Diamond for their guidance and support. I also thank Ran Abramitzky, Yiwei Chen, Jessie Handbury, Eran Hoffmann, Sitian Liu, Isaac Sorkin, Yu Zheng, and participants at Stanford Labor and Public workshop, Stanford Applied Economics workshop, Stata Texas conference, UEA conference, AREUEA conference, System Applied-Micro conference at SF Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS Proposes Regulatory Revisions to Improve Administration and Delivery of Visitor Services
    NPS Proposes Regulatory Revisions to Improve Administration and Delivery of Visitor Services JULY 23, 2020 Jonathan Simon and Melinda Meade Meyers The National Park Service (“NPS”) is proposing significant revisions to regulations governing the solicitation, award, and administration of concession contracts for the first time in 20 years. The proposed changes seek to update and expand the provision of sustainable, high-quality, and contemporary visitor services in the national parks while reducing administrative burdens on the agency and concessioners. If finalized, these changes—some of which reflect suggestions from NPS’s concessioner partners and some of which were identified by NPS—should result in important improvements in the contract solicitation and evaluation process, further incentivize concessioner investments in concessions facilities, and help improve the experience for park visitors. However, the extent to which these improvements are realized, and implications for concessioners, will depend significantly on how these changes are implemented at the park, regional, and national levels. Comments on the proposed changes are due September 18, 2020. Background on Provision of Commercial Services in National Parks NPS contracts with concessioners to provide commercial services to national park visitors at over 100 Visit our COVID Client units of the National Park System under the authority of the Concessions Management Improvement Help Center Act of 1998 (“1998 Act”) and the 2016 National Park Service Centennial Act. Examples of these services include lodging, food, retail, marinas, transportation, and guided recreation. The regulations governing the solicitation, award, and administration of concession contracts, 36 CFR Part 51, were promulgated in 2000 and have not been significantly revised since that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Concession Contract for [TBD] Concession Area
    Concession Contract for [TBD] Concession Area United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Lake Berryessa Concession Contract No. ____________________________ With [ Business Name of Contractor ] Covering the period [Month/Day], [Year] through December 31, [Year] U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2015 Identification of the Parties THIS Concession Contract is made and entered into by and between the United States of America, acting, through the Regional Director or designee, Mid Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, hereinafter referred to as Contracting Officer” and (name of bidder, type of business and state of organization) authorized to do business in the State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “Concession Contractor.” Lake Berryessa Concession Prospectus Witnesseth Whereas, the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has determined that certain facilities and services are necessary and appropriate for the public use and enjoyment of the Concession Area(s), and the Concession Contractor is willing to provide such facilities and services; and Whereas, Reclamation is willing to allow the Concession Contractor an opportunity to operate facilities and provide related services within the Concession Area(s) at the Reclamation approved rates that the Concession Contractor has determined are sufficient to create a reasonable opportunity to recover the necessary investment costs, operating costs and realize a profit over the term of the Concession Contract, commensurate with the capital invested
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Fever: an Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area
    Desert Fever: An Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area DESERT FEVER: An Overview of Mining in the California Desert Conservation Area Contract No. CA·060·CT7·2776 Prepared For: DESERT PLANNING STAFF BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 3610 Central Avenue, Suite 402 Riverside, California 92506 Prepared By: Gary L. Shumway Larry Vredenburgh Russell Hartill February, 1980 1 Desert Fever: An Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area Copyright © 1980 by Russ Hartill Larry Vredenburgh Gary Shumway 2 Desert Fever: An Overview of Mining History of the California Desert Conservation Area Table of Contents PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 9 IMPERIAL COUNTY................................................................................................................................. 12 CALIFORNIA'S FIRST SPANISH MINERS............................................................................................ 12 CARGO MUCHACHO MINE ............................................................................................................. 13 TUMCO MINE ................................................................................................................................ 13 PASADENA MINE
    [Show full text]