DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Thursday, February 28, 2008 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Critical Habitat for the Contiguous United States Distinct Population Segment of the Canada Lynx (Lynx canadensis); Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:58 Feb 27, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\28FEP2.SGM 28FEP2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS 10860 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, refined to more closely circumscribe the Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203. boreal forest landscapes occupied by Fish and Wildlife Service We will not accept e-mail or faxed lynx. Refined maps that accurately comments. We will post all comments depict the specific vegetation types on 50 CFR Part 17 on http://www.regulations.gov. This all land ownerships are not readily generally means that we will post any available. We are especially interested [FWS–R6–ES–2008–0026] personal information you provide us in this information for the Greater 92210–1117–0000-B4] (see the Public Comments section below Yellowstone Area unit. RIN 1018–AV78 for more information). (9) Whether our proposed revised FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: critical habitat for the lynx should be Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Mark Wilson, Field Supervisor, altered in any way to account for and Plants; Revised Critical Habitat for Montana Ecological Services Office, 585 climate change. the Contiguous United States Distinct Shepard Way, Helena, MT, 59601; (10) Whether the proposed revised critical habitat designation for the lynx Population Segment of the Canada telephone 406–449–5225. If you use a should include private lands, or Lynx (Lynx canadensis) telecommunications device for the deaf whether the proposed Federal lands are (TDD), call the Federal Information AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, sufficient to conserve lynx. Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. Interior. (11) Whether U.S. Forest Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ACTION: Proposed rule. (USFS) lands that occur in the wildland- Public Comments urban-interface (WUI) should be SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and excluded from critical habitat under Wildlife Service (Service), propose to We intend that any final action section 4(b)(2) of the Act so that fuels- revise designated critical habitat for the resulting from this proposal will be as reduction projects designed to protect contiguous United States distinct accurate and as effective as possible. human life and property from wildfire population segment of the Canada lynx Therefore, we request comments or would not be impeded in any way in (Lynx canadensis) (lynx) under the suggestions on this proposed rule. We these areas. Endangered Species Act of 1973, as particularly seek comments concerning: (12) Whether the Greater Yellowstone amended (Act). In the contiguous (1) The reasons why we should or Area is essential to the conservation of United States, the lynx generally should not designate specific habitat as lynx. Lynx in this proposed unit occur inhabits cold, moist boreal forests. ‘‘critical habitat’’ under section 4 of the at lower densities than in other Approximately 42,753 square miles Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). proposed units, and the population is 2 2 (2) Specific information on: not connected to Canada, which is an (mi ) (110,727 square kilometers (km )) • fall within the boundaries of the The amount and distribution of important source of lynx in the United lynx habitat, States. proposed revised critical habitat • designation. The proposed revised What areas occupied at the time of (13) Any foreseeable economic, designation would add an additional listing and that contain features national security, or other potential 40,913 mi2 (105,959 km2) to the existing essential for the conservation of the impacts resulting from the proposed critical habitat designation of 1,841 mi2 species we should include in the designation and, in particular, any (4,768 km2). The proposed revised designation and why that might be so, impacts on small entities, and the and benefits of including or excluding areas critical habitat is located in Boundary • County, Idaho; Aroostook, Franklin, What areas not occupied at the time that exhibit these impacts. Penobscot, Piscataquis, and Somerset of listing are essential to the (14) Whether we could improve or Counties in Maine; Cook, Koochiching, conservation of the species and why modify our approach to designating Lake, and St. Louis Counties in that might be so. critical habitat in any way to provide for Minnesota; Flathead, Glacier, Granite, (3) Comments or information that may greater public participation and Lake, Lewis and Clark, Lincoln, assist us with identifying or clarifying understanding, or to better Missoula, Pondera, Powell, Teton, the primary constituent element. accommodate public concerns and Gallatin, Park, Sweetgrass, Stillwater, (4) Land use designations and current comments. and Carbon Counties in Montana; or planned activities in the areas The size of the individual Indian Chelan and Okanogan Counties in proposed as critical habitat and their reservation lands in the Northern Washington; and Park, Teton, Fremont, possible impacts on proposed revised Rockies, Maine, and Minnesota units is Sublette, and Lincoln Counties in critical habitat. relatively small. As a result, we believe Wyoming. (5) Whether Tribal lands in the conservation of the lynx can be Northern Rockies, Maine, and achieved by limiting the designation to DATES: We will accept comments Minnesota units need to be included as the other lands in the proposal without received or postmarked on or before critical habitat pursuant to Secretarial including Tribal lands (see April 28, 2008. We must receive Order Number 3206. ‘‘Relationship of Critical Habitat to requests for public hearings, in writing, (6) Whether lands the Southern Rocky Tribal Lands’’ below). at the address shown in the ADDRESSES Mountains contain the physical and The southern Rocky Mountains in section by April 14, 2008. biological features that are essential for Colorado, Utah, and southern Wyoming ADDRESSES: You may submit comments the conservation of the species and the are disjunct from other lynx habitats in by one of the following methods: basis for why that might be so the United States and Canada. The • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// (7) Whether lands in any unoccupied nearest lynx population occurs in the www.regulations.gov. Follow the areas, such as the ‘‘Kettle Range’’ in Greater Yellowstone Area (GYA), which instructions for submitting comments. Ferry County, Washington, are essential is a small, low density population also • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public to the conservation of lynx and the basis disjunct from other lynx populations Comments Processing, Attn: [FWS–R6– for why that might be so. and is unlikely to regularly supply ES–2008–0026]; Division of Policy and (8) How the proposed boundaries of dispersing lynx to the Southern Rockies. Directives Management; U.S. Fish and the revised critical habitat could be Native lynx were functionally extirpated VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:58 Feb 27, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\28FEP2.SGM 28FEP2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 40 / Thursday, February 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules 10861 from their historic range in Colorado Hick 2007) that may provide insight on CONTACT). Maps of the proposed revised and southern Wyoming by the time the changes to lynx habitat. If necessary and critical habitat are also available on the lynx was listed as a threatened species appropriate, revisions to this proposed Internet at http://mountain-prairie. under the Act in 2000. In 1999, the State rule will be made to address this fws.gov/species/mammals/lynx/. of Colorado began an intensive effort to information. We will also be revising Background reintroduce lynx. Although it is too the economic analysis and early to determine whether the environmental assessment prepared for It is our intent to discuss only those introduction will result in a self- the previous designation and providing topics directly relevant to the sustaining population, the reintroduced drafts of the new economic analysis and designation of critical habitat in this lynx have produced kittens and now are environmental assessment to the public proposed rule. For more information on distributed throughout the lynx habitat before finalizing this proposal. the lynx refer to the final listing rule in Colorado and southern Wyoming. On the basis of public comment, published in the Federal Register on These animals are not designated as an during the development of the revised March 24, 2000 (65 FR 16052), and the experimental population under section final rule we may find, among other clarification of findings published in the 10(j) of the Act. Although Colorado’s things, that areas proposed are not Federal Register on July 3, 2003 (68 FR reintroduction effort is an important essential to the conservation of the 40076). step toward the recovery of lynx, we are species, are appropriate for exclusion Canada lynx are medium-sized cats, not proposing revised critical habitat in under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, or are generally measuring 30 to 35 inches (in) the Southern Rockies because of the not appropriate for exclusion. In all of (75 to 90 centimeters (cm)) long and current uncertainty that a self-sustaining these cases, this information will be weighing 18 to 23 pounds (8 to 10.5 lynx population will become incorporated into the revised final kilograms) (Quinn and Parker 1987, established. designation. Further, we may find as a Table 1). They have large, well-furred The Kettle Range in Washington result of public comments that areas not feet and long legs for traversing snow; historically supported lynx populations proposed should also be designated as tufts on the ears; and short, black-tipped (Stinson 2001).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lookout 2018-0809
    The Lookout August - September 2018 Adirondack Mountain Club — Schenectady Chapter Dedicated to the preservation, protection and enjoyment of the Forest Preserve http://www.adk-schenectady.org Adirondack Mountain Club — Schenectady Chapter Board ELECTED OFFICERS LOOKOUT EDITOR: CHAIR: Mal Provost Stan Stoklosa 518-399-1565 518-383-3066 [email protected] [email protected] MEMBERSHIP: VICE-CHAIR: Mary Zawacki Vacant 914-373-8733 [email protected] SECRETARY: Jacque McGinn NORTHVILLE PLACID TRAIL: 518-438-0557 Mary MacDonald 79 Kenaware Avenue, Delmar, NY 12054 518-371-1293 [email protected] [email protected] TREASURER: OUTINGS: Mike Brun Roy Keats 518-399-1021 518-370-0399 [email protected] [email protected] DIRECTOR: PRINTING/MAILING: Roy Keats Rich Vertigan 603-953-8782 518-381-9319 [email protected] [email protected] PROJECT COORDINATORS: PUBLICITY: Horst DeLorenzi Richard Wang 518-399-4615 518-399-3108 [email protected] [email protected] Jacque McGinn TRAILS: 518-438-0557 Norm Kuchar [email protected] 518-399-6243 [email protected] Jason Waters 518-369-5516 WEB MASTER: [email protected] Rich Vertigan 518-381-9319 APPOINTED MEMBERS [email protected] CONSERVATION: WHITEWATER: Mal Provost Ralph Pascale 518-399-1565 518-235-1614 [email protected] [email protected] INNINGS: YOUNG MEMBERS GROUP: Sally Dewes Dustin Wright 518-346-1761 603-953-8782 [email protected] [email protected] Dennis Wischman navigates Zoar Gap on the Deerfield River On the during a class on whitewater skills offered by Sally Dewes in cover June.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Wyoming Board of Trustees' Report
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ REPORT September 6-8, 2007 The Final Report can be found on the University of Wyoming Board of Trustees website at www.uwyo.edu/trustees/meetings University of Wyoming Mission Statement (April 2002) The University of Wyoming aspires to be one of the nation’s finest public land-grant research universities, dedicated to serving as a statewide resource for accessible and affordable higher education of the highest quality, rigorous scholarship, technology transfer, economic and community development, and responsible stewardship of our cultural, historical, and natural resources. In the exercise of our primary mission to teach and educate students, we seek to provide academic and co-curricular opportunities that will: • Expose students to the frontiers of scholarship and creative activity, and the complexities of an interdependent world; • Ensure individual interactions among students, faculty, and staff; • Nurture an environment that values and manifests diversity, free expression, academic freedom, personal integrity, and mutual respect; and • Promote opportunities for personal growth, physical health, athletic competition, and leadership development for all members of the University community. As Wyoming’s only university, we are committed to outreach and service that extend our human talent and technological capacity to serve the people in our communities, our state, the nation, and the world. The primary vehicles for identifying the specific actions and resource allocations needed to achieve this complex mission are the University’s Academic Plan, Support Services Plan, and Capital Facilities Plan, each revised periodically. TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING AGENDA September 6-8, 2007 Thursday, September 6, 2007 9:30 a.m.-11:45 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe
    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Magma Loading in the Southern Coast Plutonic Complex, British Columbia and Washington
    GeoScienceWorld Lithosphere Volume 2020, Article ID 8856566, 17 pages https://doi.org/10.2113/2020/8856566 Review Article Magma Loading in the Southern Coast Plutonic Complex, British Columbia and Washington E. H. Brown Department of Geology, Western Washington University, USA Correspondence should be addressed to E. H. Brown; [email protected] Received 2 May 2020; Accepted 22 September 2020; Published 10 November 2020 Academic Editor: Tamer S. Abu-Alam Copyright © 2020 E. H. Brown. Exclusive Licensee GeoScienceWorld. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). The southen end of the 1800 km long Coast Plutonic Complex (CPC), exposed in the Harrison Lake area of British Columbia and in the North Cascades of Washington, bears a record of great crustal thickening -20 to 40 km in localized zones during Late Cretaceous times. During this period, the CPC was positioned at the continental margin during collision/subduction of the Farallon plate. Arc magmatism and regional orogenic contraction were both active as potential crustal thickening processes. Magmatism is favored in this report as the dominant factor based on the delineation of four spatially and temporally separate loading events, the close association of the loaded areas with emplacement of large plutons, and a paucity of evidence of deep regional tectonic contraction. The timing and spatial location of crustal loading events are documented by the following: zircon ages in plutons; an early event of low pressure in pluton aureoles evidenced by andalusite, now pseudomorphed by high- pressure minerals; high pressures in country rock in pluton aureoles measured by mineral compositions in the assemblages garnet-biotite-muscovite-plagioclase and garnet-aluminum silicate-plagioclase; high pressures recorded in plutons by Al-in- hornblende barometry; and uplift ages of plutons derived from K-Ar and Ar-Ar ages of micas and hornblende in plutons.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy, Age, and Provenance of the Eocene Chumstick Basin
    Stratigraphy, age, and provenance of the Eocene Chumstick basin, Washington Cascades; implications for paleogeography, regional tectonics, and development of strike-slip basins Erin E. Donaghy1,†, Paul J. Umhoefer2, Michael P. Eddy1, Robert B. Miller3, and Taylor LaCasse4 1 Department of Earth, Planetary, and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA 2 School of Earth Sciences and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA 3 Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, California 95192, USA 4 Department of Geology, Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota 55057 USA ABSTRACT tions can be constrained at high temporal Here we present a large provenance data set resolution (0.5–1.5 m.y. scale) for an ancient coupled with new lithofacies mapping from Strike-slip faults form in a wide variety strike-slip basin and permits a detailed re- the Chumstick basin within the framework of a of tectonic settings and are a first-order construction of sediment routing pathways recently developed precise depositional chronol- control on the geometry and sediment accu- and depositional environments. As a result, ogy (Eddy et al., 2016b). This basin formed in mulation patterns in adjacent sedimentary we can assess how varying sediment supply a strike-slip setting in central Washington and basins. Although the structural and depo- and accommodation space affects the depo- provides a unique opportunity to track changes sitional architecture of strike-slip basins is sitional architecture during strike-slip basin in sediment routing systems that are related well documented, few studies of strike-slip evolution. to rapidly changing paleogeography in basin- basins have integrated depositional age, bounding basement blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • View Or Download the Print
    AppalachianThe June / July 2012 VOICE THIS IS OUR LAND The Plight of Our Public Places and the Compelling Case for Conservation Hidden ALSO INSIDE: Coal’s Big Decline • Return of the American Chestnut Treasures Special Insert The Appalachian Voice cross Appalachia A publication of A Environmental News From Around the Region AppalachianVoices A Note from our Executive Director 171 Grand Blvd • Boone, NC 28607 It’s no secret that kids are now spend- 828-262-1500 Since the days of the uncompromising Republican “Kids In Parks” Gets Kids Outside ing more time indoors. A Kaiser Fam- www.AppalachianVoices.org president, Theodore Roosevelt, the struggle to protect our [email protected] ily Foundation study published in 2010 vital resources has often been countered by a nearly limit- By Jessica Kennedy At the core of Kids In Parks is its Trails Ridges and Active Caring Kids, showed that children ages 8 to 18 spend EDITOR ....................................................... Jamie Goodman less greed for financial gain. But as the venerable Roosevelt There is a growing distance be- MANAGING EDITOR ........................................... Brian Sewell or TRACK, program. The Kids In an average of 7 hours and 38 minutes us- — who greatly expanded the budding U.S. national park tween children and nature, says Jason ASSOCIATE EDITOR ............................................Molly Moore Parks website provides links to maps ing entertainment media in a typical day. and national forest systems — said in his 1907 message to Urroz, director of Kids In Parks, an DISTRIBUTION MANAGER .................................. Maeve Gould and brochures for each of the 10 par- Kids In Parks is working to change GRAPHIC DESIGNER .........................................Meghan Darst Congress, “We are prone to speak of the resources of this innovative program working to get “There can be ticipating trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho Contact Information For more information about the Yellowstone National Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or 307-344-7381 or write to: Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park, PO Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190-0168 Park Description Yellowstone became the world’s first national park on March This vast landscape contains the headwaters of several major 1, 1872, set aside in recognition of its unique hydrothermal rivers. The Firehole and Gibbon rivers unite to form the Madison, features and for the benefit and enjoyment of the people. which, along with the Gallatin River, joins the Jefferson to With this landmark decision, the United States Congress create the Missouri River several miles north of the park. The created a path for future parks within this country and Yellowstone River is a major tributary of the Missouri, which around the world; Yellowstone still serves as a global then flows via the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico. The Snake resource conservation and tourism model for public land River arises near the park’s south boundary and joins the management. Yellowstone is perhaps most well-known for its Columbia to flow into the Pacific. Yellowstone Lake is the largest hydrothermal features such as the iconic Old Faithful geyser. lake at high altitude in North America and the Lower Yellowstone The park encompasses 2.25 million acres, or 3,472 square Falls is the highest of more than 40 named waterfalls in the park. miles, of a landscape punctuated by steaming pools, bubbling mudpots, spewing geysers, and colorful volcanic soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Map List
    Montana Map List Maps may be ordered online at http://store.usgs.gov For more information, call 1-888-ASK-USGS Distributed courtesy www.railroads-of-montana.com UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY USGS Quadrangle Name Quadrangle Number Version Year Scale Latitude Coordinates Longitude Coordinates ABBOTT LAKE, MT 9780607321890 01/01/1985 1:24,000 482230 - 483000 -1121500 - -1120730 ABSAROKEE, MT 9780607295627 01/01/1955 1:24,000 453000 - 453730 -1093000 - -1092230 ACKLEY LAKE, MT 9780607295634 01/01/1970 1:24,000 465230 - 470000 -1100000 - -1095230 ACME, WY 9780607600667 01/01/1978 1:24,000 445230 - 450000 -1070000 - -1065230 ACORN FLATS, MT 9780607295641 01/01/1965 1:24,000 464500 - 465230 -1070730 - -1070000 ACTON, MT 9780607295658 01/01/1956 1:24,000 455230 - 460000 -1084500 - -1083730 ADA CREEK, MT 9780607295665 01/01/1964 1:24,000 471500 - 472230 -1063730 - -1063000 ADAIR, ID 9780607891607 01/01/1995 1:24,000 471500 - 472230 -1153730 - -1153000 AGAWAM NORTH, MT 9780607321906 01/01/1985 1:24,000 480000 - 480730 -1121500 - -1120730 AGAWAM SOUTH, MT 9780607322538 01/01/1987 1:24,000 475230 - 480000 -1121500 - -1120730 AHERN PASS, MT 9780607295672 01/01/1968 1:24,000 484500 - 485230 -1135230 - -1134500 AHLES, MT 9780607295689 01/01/1983 1:24,000 462230 - 463000 -1071500 - -1070730 AJAX RANCH, MT 9780607996111 01/01/1997 1:24,000 452230 - 453000 -1133730 - -1133000 AKERS RANCH, MT 9780607295702 01/01/1963 1:24,000 463730 - 464500 -1080730 - -1080000 ALASKA BENCH, MT 9780607880083 01/01/1995 1:24,000 464500 - 465230 -1091500 - -1090730 ALBERTON,
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone Wolf Project: Annual Report, 2009
    YELLOWSTONE WOLFPROJECT ANNUAL REPORT 2009 Yellowstone Wolf Project Annual Report 2009 Douglas Smith, Daniel Stahler, Erin Albers, Richard McIntyre, Matthew Metz, Kira Cassidy, Joshua Irving, Rebecca Raymond, Hilary Zaranek, Colby Anton, Nate Bowersock National Park Service Yellowstone Center for Resources Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-2010-06 Suggested citation: Smith, D.W., D.R. Stahler, E. Albers, R. McIntyre, M. Metz, K. Cassidy, J. Irving, R. Raymond, H. Zaranek, C. Anton, N. Bowersock. 2010. Yellowstone Wolf Project: Annual Report, 2009. National Park Ser- vice, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, YCR-2010-06. Wolf logo on cover and title page: Original illustration of wolf pup #47, born to #27, of the Nez Perce pack in 1996, by Melissa Saunders. Treatment and design by Renée Evanoff. All photos not otherwise marked are NPS photos. ii TABLE OF CON T EN T S Background .............................................................iv Wolf –Prey Relationships ......................................11 2009 Summary .........................................................v Composition of Wolf Kills ...................................11 Territory Map ..........................................................vi Winter Studies.....................................................12 The Yellowstone Wolf Population .............................1 Summer Predation ...............................................13 Population and Territory Status .............................1 Population Genetics ............................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Village Area Map
    Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area GRANT VILLAGE AREA MAP Page 1 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Grant Village to Old Faithful Road Map Page 2 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Grant Village to Lake Vicinity Road Map Page 3 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Grant Village to the South Entrance Road Map Page 4 of 18 Yellowstone – Grant Village & West Thumb Area Day Hikes Near Grant Village & West Thumb Begin your hike by stopping at a ranger station or visitor center for information. Trail conditions may change suddenly and unexpectedly. Bear activity, rain or snow storms, high water, and fires may temporarily close trails. West Thumb Geyser Basin Trail Stroll through a geyser basin of colorful hot springs and dormant lakeshore geysers situated on the scenic shores of Yellowstone Lake. Trails and boardwalks are handicapped accessible with assistance. Trailhead: West Thumb Geyser Basin, 1/4 mile east of West Thumb Junction Distance: 3/8 mile (1 km) roundtrip Level of Difficulty: Easy; boardwalk trail with slight grade as trail descends to and climbs up from the lake shore Yellowstone Lake Overlook Trail Hike to a high mountain meadow for a commanding view of the West Thumb of Yellowstone Lake and the Absaroka Mountains. Trailhead: Trailhead sign at entrance to West Thumb Geyser Basin parking area Distance: 2 miles (3 km) roundtrip Level of Difficulty: Moderate; mostly level terrain with a moderately strenuous 400-foot elevation gain near the overlook. Shoshone Lake Trail (via DeLacy Creek) Hike along a forest's edge and through open meadows to the shores of Yellowstone's largest backcountry lake.
    [Show full text]