DOCSLIB.ORG

Opening Bids of One in a Suit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opening Bids of One in a Suit 914-949-5853 313 South CentralAve, [email protected] Scarsdale, NY 10583 General Guidelines for Ace-Asking Bids Once you have determined that you have enough points for slam, you must make sure that you have enough controls. One way to do this is to use an Ace-asking bid like Blackwood or Gerber. Remember that ace-asking bids are used only when you have determined that you have enough points to make slam and want to make sure you are not off two cashing aces. Do not use Blackwood to determine if you have enough strength for slam. If you have enough points for slam, do not chicken out if you find you have only 3 aces. If you don't have enough strength to bid a slam missing only one ace, then you shouldn't be asking for aces. Remember that Blackwood and Gerber tell you only the number of aces partner has. They don’t tell you which suits the aces are in or whether you're off a cashing Ace-King in a suit. You should only use Blackwood or Gerber when: 1. You've already found a good trump suit (or agreed on notrump). 2. You know you have the overall strength for a slam. 3. Your hand has controls in all unbid suits (aces, kings or singletons). DON'T use Blackwood or Gerber if: 1. You have a void. 2. You have a worthless doubleton (xx, Qx, Jx) in an unbid suit. 3. You need to know if partner has control of a specific suit. To get this information, use a control bidding sequence instead. Blackwood Asking for Aces It would be embarrassing to bid slam and then lose two aces off the top. If you think you and your partner have enough points for slam, you should bid Blackwood to make sure you are not missing two aces. Here's how it works: to ask your partner how may aces she has, simply bid 4NT. Her responses are as follows: ??? — 4NT — 5♣: 0 or 4 aces 5♦: 1 ace. 5♥: 2 aces. 5♠: 3 aces. NOTE: The 5♣ response may seem ambiguous, but in practice you will always be able to tell the difference between a partner who has no aces and a partner who has all of them! Asking for Kings After your partner reveals her number of aces, you may ask her for kings by bidding 5NT. Such a bid shows interest in a grand slam, and should only be made if you and your partner have all the aces. Your partner will respond to your 5NT bid as follows: ??? — 4NT — 5♦ — 5NT — 6♣: 0 or 4 kings. 6♦: 1 king. 6♥: 2 kings. 6♠: 3 kings. When is 4NT Blackwood? Essentially any bid of 4NT at any time is Blackwood. There is one major exception: If your partner just bid notrump, then a bid of 4NT is not Blackwood. 4NT is a quantitative raise. To ask for aces in such a situation, you should use Gerber instead. The Gerber Convention -- 4C to ask for aces The Gerber 4♣ Convention is used to ask for aces if it is agreed that you are playing NT. A bid of 4♣ directly over partner's notrump bid is Gerber and asks for aces. Partner's response tells you how many aces she holds: 4♦ = None or all four aces 4♥ = One ace 4♠ = Two aces 4NT = Three aces If your side holds all four aces and you want to investigate a grand slam, a bid of 5♣ guarantees you have all four aces and asks for kings (just like a rebid of 5NT after Blackwood 4NT). Partner will respond at the 5-level (using the same steps as above) to show the number of kings she holds. Control Bids (Cuebidding) For hands where you can't use Blackwood, you can investigate slam by "cuebidding"--bidding new suits to show outside controls (Aces, Kings, singletons or voids). Cue bidding should be renamed. What does a “cue” have to do with showing control in a suit? Moreover, we refer to the bidding of the opponents’ suit also as cue bidding, thereby confusing the issue. There is a movement toward calling bids that show controls “control bids”. We wish to perpetuate that movement. As a result, we will refer to these bids as control bids. Once you and partner have agreed on a trump suit, a new-suit bid is not a search for a different trump suit. It shows a specific outside control, either and ace or king or singleton or void. Your control bid asks partner to cooperate by bidding the cheapest suit where she holds a control (either and ace or king or singleton or void). There is one exception, do not bid a singleton or void in partner’s suit. You must only make a control bid in partner’s suit with the A or K. If you bid with a singleton or void in partner’s suit, she will be sorely disappointed to find her suit doesn’t run opposite your singleton or void. Here's an example of control bidding: ♠AKJ874 ♥2 ♦43 ♣AKT9 You open 1♠ and partner bids 2♥ (GF). You rebid 2♠. Partner now bids 3♠ showing extra values under the principle of fast arrival, where she would have bid 4♠ with a minimum hand. You now reevaluate your hand. You have 15 HCP + 3 distribution points for a singleton for a total of 18 points. You know that opposite partner’s 15-17 points you have 33 or more points, so you want to be in 6♠. However, you are not sure whether the 7 or 8 points you are missing might be the AK of diamonds, in which case you will lose two tricks immediately. Notice that using Blackwood or 1430 won’t tell you this information. If partner shows 1 ace, you won’t know if it is in hearts or diamonds. So you still may be off the AK of diamonds. To locate first or second round control in diamonds, you must start a control bidding sequence. You would start by bidding 4♣. Since you could just bid 4♠ if you wanted to be in game, a bid of 4♣ tells partner that you have hopes for slam, you have a control in clubs, but you have a hand that can’t use Blackwood or 1430. Partner now must control bid the first suit where she has 1st or 2nd round control (an ace, king, singleton, or void). If partner now control bids 4♦, you'll know that you are not off two cashing diamonds. You can now bid Blackwood or 1430 to make sure you are not off 2 aces and to see if maybe you can make 7♠. If partner instead control bids 4♥, it tells you she does not have 1st or 2nd round control of diamonds (since she will control bid her cheapest control). Over partner's 4♥ control bid, you can sign off in 4♠ knowing that you are off 2 cashing diamonds. The opponents should be listening to the auction and lead a diamond, but that is a small price to pay to avoid going down in a slam. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tt Fall 12 Web.Pub
    VOL. 53 No. 3 FALL 2012 Meet Michigan’s winning mini-Spingold squad Editor’s note: A team of five 20-something Ann Arbor players won the 0-1500 mini- Spingold KO, a multi- day limited national championship, at the summer North Ameri- can Bridge Champion- ships in Philadelphia. A month earlier, they also won the Sunday Winners of the mini-Spingold 0-1500 Swiss Teams at the KO Teams: (front) Jin Hu and Jonathan Fleischmann; (back) Max Glick, Zach- Toledo Regional. ary Scherr and Zachary Wasserman. Here are their stories: Jonathan Fleischmann ter. I'm an attorney less than a year out of law school. I'm 24 years old and live in I started playing in 1999 Bloomfield Hills with my fa- (Continued on page 22) ther, two brothers, and a sis- DON’T FORGET TO VOTE The annual election for MBA Board of Directors will be held during the last four days of the October regional. If you cannot be there on one of those days, you can still vote by complet- ing and sending in an absentee ballot. See page 5. Candi- dates’ pictures and statements appear on pages 6 and 7. Michigan Bridge Association Unit #137 2012 VINCE & JOAN REMEY MOTOR CITY REGIONAL October 8-14, 2012 Site: William Costick Center, 28600 Eleven Mile Road, Farmington Hills MI 48336 (between Inkster and Middlebelt roads) 248-473-1816 Intermediate/Newcomers Schedule (0-299 MP) Single-session Stratified Open Pairs: Tue. through Fri., 1 p.m. & 7 p.m.; Sat., 10 a.m. & 2:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall of Fame Takes Five
    Friday, July 24, 2009 Volume 81, Number 1 Daily Bulletin Washington, DC 81st Summer North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Paul Linxwiler Hall of Fame takes five Hall of Fame inductee Mark Lair, center, with Mike Passell, left, and Eddie Wold. Sportsman of the Year Peter Boyd with longtime (right) Aileen Osofsky and her son, Alan. partner Steve Robinson. If standing ovations could be converted to masterpoints, three of the five inductees at the Defenders out in top GNT flight Bridge Hall of Fame dinner on Thursday evening The District 14 team captained by Bob sixth, Bill Kent, is from Iowa. would be instant contenders for the Barry Crane Top Balderson, holding a 1-IMP lead against the They knocked out the District 9 squad 500. defending champions with 16 deals to play, won captained by Warren Spector (David Berkowitz, Time after time, members of the audience were the fourth quarter 50-9 to advance to the round of Larry Cohen, Mike Becker, Jeff Meckstroth and on their feet, applauding a sterling new class for the eight in the Grand National Teams Championship Eric Rodwell). The team was seeking a third ACBL Hall of Fame. Enjoying the accolades were: Flight. straight win in the event. • Mark Lair, many-time North American champion Five of the six team members are from All four flights of the GNT – including Flights and one of ACBL’s top players. Minnesota – Bob and Cynthia Balderson, Peggy A, B and C – will play the round of eight today. • Aileen Osofsky, ACBL Goodwill chair for nearly Kaplan, Carol Miner and Paul Meerschaert.
    [Show full text]
  • Chance, Luck and Statistics : the Science of Chance
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Alberta Gambling Research Institute Alberta Gambling Research Institute 1963 Chance, luck and statistics : the science of chance Levinson, Horace C. Dover Publications, Inc. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/41334 book Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Chance, Luck and Statistics THE SCIENCE OF CHANCE (formerly titled: The Science of Chance) BY Horace C. Levinson, Ph. D. Dover Publications, Inc., New York Copyright @ 1939, 1950, 1963 by Horace C. Levinson All rights reserved under Pan American and International Copyright Conventions. Published in Canada by General Publishing Company, Ltd., 30 Lesmill Road, Don Mills, Toronto, Ontario. Published in the United Kingdom by Constable and Company, Ltd., 10 Orange Street, London, W.C. 2. This new Dover edition, first published in 1963. is a revised and enlarged version ot the work pub- lished by Rinehart & Company in 1950 under the former title: The Science of Chance. The first edi- tion of this work, published in 1939, was called Your Chance to Win. International Standard Rook Number: 0-486-21007-3 Libraiy of Congress Catalog Card Number: 63-3453 Manufactured in the United States of America Dover Publications, Inc. 180 Varick Street New York, N.Y. 10014 PREFACE TO DOVER EDITION THE present edition is essentially unchanged from that of 1950. There are only a few revisions that call for comment. On the other hand, the edition of 1950 contained far more extensive revisions of the first edition, which appeared in 1939 under the title Your Chance to Win. One major revision was required by the appearance in 1953 of a very important work, a life of Cardan,* a brief account of whom is given in Chapter 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Slam Bidding Ebook
    Practical Slam Bidding ebook RON KLINGER MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR BIG HANDS INTRODUCTION Slam bidding brings an excitement all of its own. The pulse quickens, adrenalin is pumping, it’s all systems go. The culmination can be euphoria when you are successful, misery when the slam fails. The aim of this book is to increase your euphoria-to-misery ratio. Of all the skills in bridge, experts perform worst in the slam area. You do not need to go far to find the reason: Lack of experience. Slams occur on about 10% of all deals. Compare that with 50% for partscores and 40% for games. No wonder players are less familiar with the big hands. Half of the slam hands will be yours, half will go to your opponents. You can thus expect a slam your way about 5% of the time. That is roughly one deal per session. If you play twice a week, you can hope for about a hundred slams a year. Practise on the 120 deals in this book and study them, and you will have the equivalent of an extra year’s training under your belt. Your euphoria ratio is then bound to rise. How to use this ebook This is not so much an ebook for reading pleasure as a workbook. It is ideal for partnership practice but you can also use it on your own. For each set of hands, the dealer is given, followed by the vulnerability. You and partner are the East and West. If the dealer is North, East comes next; if the dealer is South, West is next.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap for Resilience: the California Surgeon General's
    DECEMBER 09, 2020 Roadmap for Resilience The California Surgeon General’s Report on Adverse Childhood Experiences, Toxic Stress, and Health Roadmap for Resilience: The California Surgeon General’s Report on Adverse Childhood Experiences, Toxic Stress, and Health Suggested citation for the report: Bhushan D, Kotz K, McCall J, Wirtz S, Gilgoff R, Dube SR, Powers C, Olson-Morgan J, Galeste M, Patterson K, Harris L, Mills A, Bethell C, Burke Harris N, Office of the California Surgeon General. Roadmap for Resilience: The California Surgeon General’s Report on Adverse Childhood Experiences, Toxic Stress, and Health. Office of the California Surgeon General, 2020. DOI: 10.48019/PEAM8812. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR December 2, 2020 In one of my first acts as Governor, I established the role of California Surgeon General. Among all the myriad challenges facing our administration on the first day, addressing persistent challenges to the health and welfare of the people of our state—especially that of the youngest Californians—was an essential priority. We led with the overwhelming scientific consensus that upstream factors, including toxic stress and the social determinants of health, are the root causes of many of the most harmful and persistent health challenges, from heart disease to homelessness. An issue so critical to the health of 40 million Californians deserved nothing less than a world-renowned expert and advocate. Appointed in 2019 to be the first- ever California Surgeon General, Dr. Nadine Burke Harris brought groundbreaking research and expertise in childhood trauma and adversity to the State’s efforts. In this new role, Dr. Burke Harris set three key priorities – early childhood, health equity and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and toxic stress – and is working across my administration to give voice to the science and evidence-based practices that are foundational to the success of our work as a state.
    [Show full text]
  • Friendly Bridge Book
    Beginning Bridge Lessons By Ed Kinlaw and Linda MacCleave Richmond Bridge Association Richmond, Virginia Copyright © 2003 First printing September 2003 Revised second printing February 2004 Revised third printing May 2004 Revised fourth printing September 2004 Revised fifth printing February 2005 Revised sixth printing September 2005 Revised seventh printing February 2006 Revised eighth printing August 2006 Revised ninth printing March 2007 Tenth printing September 2007 Revised eleventh printing January 2008 Revised twelfth printing August 2008 Revised thirteenth printing February 2009 Fourteenth printing July 2009 Revised fifteenth printing February 2010 Sixteenth printing August 2010 Revised seventeenth printing January 2011 Revised eighteenth printing August 2011 Revised nineteenth printing March 2012 Revised twentieth printing April 2012 Twenty-first printing August 2012 Revised Twenty-fifth printing January 2014 Revised 26th printing August 2014 Revised 27th printing February 2015 28th printing August 2015 29th printing February 2016 30th printing July 2016 31st printing January 2017 32nd printing September 2017 33rd printing February 2018 34th printing August 2018 35th printing February 2019 36th printing August 2019 37th revised printing February 2020 2 Table of Contents Lesson 1: Mechanics of a Hand in Duplicate Bridge 5 Lesson 2: How to Open and How to Respond to One-level Suit 12 Lesson 3: Rebids by Opening Bidder and Responder 17 Lesson 4: Overcalls 24 Lesson 5: Takeout Doubles 27 Lesson 6: Responding to No-Trump Opening—Stayman
    [Show full text]
  • Slam Bidding Why Bid a Slam? Just Like There Is a Bonus for Being in the Game Level, There Is a Bonus for Being in the Slam Levels
    Slam Bidding Why bid a slam? Just like there is a bonus for being in the game level, there is a bonus for being in the slam levels. A small slam is a contract at the 6-level, Bidding and making a small slam is worth 500 bonus points when not vul and 750 bonus points when vul. A grand slam is a contract at the 7-level, Bidding and making a small slam is worth 1000 bonus points when not vul and 1500 bonus points when vul. Decision #1: Do you have enough overall strength? When considering a slam, you have to first decide if your two hands have the power to take 12 or 13 tricks once you get the lead. You can often add your points to the number partner has shown to determine your chances. For "normal", fairly balanced hands, use these guidelines: • To make a small slam (bid of 6) -- you need 33 pts. • To make a grand slam (bid of 7) -- you need 37 pts. You may make a slam with fewer points if your hands have other features to make up for what you lack in high-card strength. These include: • Extra trumps -- you need at least an 8-card fit to bid a suit slam, but stronger fits produce more tricks. You may score an extra trick for each trump you have over 8. • Long, strong side suits -- if you can set up and run a long side suit, the small cards can be as valuable as honors. • Short suits -- once you know you have a trump fit, add in your distribution points to determine your hand's full value.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard American System Notes Noble Shore
    Standard American System Notes Noble Shore Pages Definitions 2 1NT opening 3-10 1H/S openings 11-14 1D/C openings 15-18 Weak openings 19-21 Strong openings 22-23 Overcalls 24-25 Takeout Doubles 26-27 Slam Bidding 28-29 Carding 30 Sample ACBL Convention Cards 31-32 Index of Conventions 33 Author’s Note 34 Definitions A balanced hand contains no singletons or voids and at most one doubleton. Points refer to a total value of a hand, including shape. HCP refers only to a hand’s high-card points. A natural suited bid shows 4+ cards in its suit. A natural notrump bid shows a desire to play in notrump. A non-natural bid is called an artificial bid. A convention is a commonly used artificial bid that has been given a name. Conventions are not part of Standard American, but many are commonly or nearly-universally played. A forcing bid demands a bid from partner if the next opponent passes. A forcing bid is also known as one- round-forcing. A signoff is a bid that strongly requests a pass or correction to another suit shown by the player signing off. Partner normally may not make a bid in any suit not shown by the signing-off player. A signoff usually occurs when the captain of the auction places the final contract. An invitational bid communicates that the partnership should bid a game unless partner has very minimal strength for previous actions. A game-forcing bid means that the partnership cannot play any contract below 3NT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jacoby 2NT Convention David Bakhshi
    English Bridge Useful Conventions by David Bakhshi S Roman Key-Card N O I T N E Blackwood V N O C L IN this series, we will look at several responder also reveals whether he holds the U conventions that have been embraced queen of trumps, the final im portant card F both by the expert community and also by when bidding good slams. E aspiring players looking to develop their S bidding accuracy. The first of these is a How does the 4NT bidder proceed? David Bakhshi U variation on the Blackwood convention, which utilises a bid of 4NT to ask partner While it may seem that having either/or how many aces he holds, to ensure that the responses will be confusing to the 4NT 1 RKCB with spades as trumps; 2 1 or 4 key cards; partnership does not attempt to bid a slam bidder, it will often be the case that he 3 Asking for the spade queen; 4 ♠Q + ♣K. when missing two aces. The traditional will know how many key cards his responses to the Blackwood 4NT enquiry partner has as a result of the number of Asking for kings are: 5 ♣ = 0 or 4 aces; 5 ♦ = 1 ace; 5 ♥ = 2 key cards he possesses himself. If two key aces; 5 ♠ = 3 aces. cards are missing, the enquirer will simply Can the enquirer still ask for kings when sign off by returning to the trump suit at interested in a grand slam? Why have variations developed? the five level. When the partner ship is As with regular Blackwood, the enquirer missing just one key card, he will still be can ask for kings by asking for key cards How many times have you bid a slam that interested in slam; now the enquirer first, then following up with a bid of 5NT.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall of Fame Inducts Five Players
    Friday, July 19, 2019 Volume 91, Number 1 Daily Bulletin 91st North American Bridge Championships [email protected] | Editors: Paul Linxwiler, Chip Dombrowski, Sue Munday Henneberger wins Hall of Fame inducts five players At last night’s induction ceremony for the Robot IndividualMartin Henneberger ACBL Hall of Fame, five players became members of Coquitlam BC won the of the Hall’s Class of 2019. Peter Boyd, Bart Summer NABC Robot Bramley and Judi Radin were chosen directly by Individual with a score the Hall of Fame electors for the Open category, of 68.62%. Henneberger while Patty Tucker received the Blackwood Award had been in second place for her contributions to the game, and the late after the first two days by Michael Seamon received the von Zedtwitz Award about 4 percentage points in recognition of his bridge accomplishments. behind Fred Pollack, but Additionally, Curtis Cheek received the Sidney H. Henneberger’s day three score of 67.52% put him Lazard Jr. Sportsmanship Award. over when Pollack could muster only 55.75%. The event was emceed by David Berkowitz. Pollack of Laval QC finished second with 67.31%. The ceremony began with Marc Jacobus Sheng Li of New York presenting Cheek for the sportsmanship honor. won Flight B with 64.52%, “I met Curtis 30 years ago. He’s a great just 0.06% ahead of Day opponent and a great person. He always introduced 2019 Hall of Fame Open inductees: Bart 2 leader John Mayne of himself at the table, and he always smiled, but Bramley, Judi Radin and Peter Boyd.
    [Show full text]
  • Slam Bidding Part I
    BETTER BIDDING by BERNARD MAGEE leaps in value because you have a fit. You have 17 high-card points, can add two for your excellent long suit and also two for your singleton (with the long trumps); that makes a total of 21. Your partner’s bid shows 10-12 points so that puts the Slam partnership in the range of 31-33, which certainly has slam potential, and there- fore you should try for slam. A 4♥ bid would finish the auction, so West must Bidding do something else to try to find a slam. We will discuss the conventions availa- Part I ble in the forthcoming two articles. Layout B ♠ A 10 4 2 ♠ K Q J 6 ♥ 9 6 4 N ♥ A K 5 3 W E idding slams is not easy, but of the approach followed in this article, ♦ A 9 7 2 S ♦ K 4 there is no doubt that bidding readers who use this method of evalua- ♣ A8 ♣ K 5 3 B and making a slam is one of the tion should stick with it, and when it sug- great joys of bridge. The first important gests that a slam might be on, they should element in slam bidding is trying to explore its possibility. identify when a slam might be on. Note that although you may have 30 Layout C points between you (or the Losing Trick ♠ A10 ♠ K Q J 6 Count might suggest that a slam is on), ♥ 9 6 4 N ♥ A K 5 3 Basic identification W E but without the necessary controls (aces, ♦ A 9 7 2 S ♦ K 4 Slams are a lot easier to make if you kings, singletons and voids), you may ♣ A 8 4 2 ♣ K 5 3 have a big trump fit, because you can still not be able to make a slam – there make extra tricks by trumping and so do is plenty of checking to be done! not have to rely on high cards alone.
    [Show full text]