DOCSLIB.ORG

Food-Niche Relationships Between Great Horned Owls and Common

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

January1984] ShortCommunications 175 new buffer systems,or better staining regimes may formed in the Cornell Laboratoryfor Ecologicaland reveal the expression of enzymes not seen in our Evolutionary Genetics. study. Rather, the total score for each tissue over all the taxa we examined is more informative. There- LITERATURE CITED fore, a quantitative comparisonwas made by assign- ARISE, J. C., J. c. PATTON, & C. F. AQUADRO. !980. ing a ! to all tissueswith faint expressionand a 2 to Evolutionary geneticsof birds: comparativemo- those with good expressionand then totalling these lecular evolution in New World warblers and numbers for all enzymes in each tissue(see bottom rodents. J. Hered. 7!: 303-3!0. of Table !). Again, feather pulp was more informa- tive than blood but less informative than internal BAKER,M. C. !981. A musclebiopsy procedurefor use in electrophoreticstudies of birds. Auk 98: organs. 392-393. There are only two serious limitations to using BARROWCLOUGH,G. F., & K. W. CORBIN. !978. Ge- feather pulp for electrophoreticanalysis. First, the netic variation and differentiation in the Paru- birds must either be molting when sampled or be lidae. Auk 95: 691-702. subjectedto plucking to stimulate feather regrowth HARRIS, I-I., & D. A. HOPKINSON. 1976. Handbook of and then recapturedat a later date. Second,in small enzyme electrophoresisin human genetics.New birds such as Bobolinks, warblers (Parulidae), or York, American Elsevier. chickadees(Parus spp.), only tiny amounts of tissue MAY, g., J. E. WRIGHT, & M. STONEKING. !979. Joint can be obtained from the flight and tail feathers,ne- segregation of biochemical loci in Salmonidae: cessitatingthe useof two or more feathers.Mengden resultsfrom experimentswith Salvelinusand re- and Stock (!976) point out, however, that small quan- view of the literature on other species.J. Fish. tities of tissuemay be put into cell culture to increase Res. Board Canada 36: !!14-!126. the amount available; such tissue cultures may also MINGDEN,G. A., & D. STOCK.!976. A preliminary be stored for indefinite periods of time. Alternative- report on the application of current cytological ly, other forms of electrophoresisthat require smaller techniquesto sexing birds. Intern. Zool. Year- quantitiesof tissue(e.g. celluloseacetate) may be per- book !6: 136-14!. formed when only a few loci need to be examined. RYTTMAN,I-I., & I-I. TELGELSTROM.!981. Low degree Especiallyuseful to field workers, the tissueis con- of isozyme variation within and between Her- veniently "pre-packaged,"and may be placed, whole ring Gull (Larusargentatus), Lesser Black-backed or with the upper shaft removed, directly onto dry Gull (Larusfuscus) and their Britishand Swedish ice or into a portable liquid nitrogen flask. In terms subspecies.Hereditas 94: !61-!64. of easeof samplecollection and minimizationof stress SHERMAN,I•. W. !98!. Electrophoresisand avian ge- to birds, we suggestthat feather pulp is a viable al- neological analysis. Auk 98: 419-422. ternative tissuefor non-destructivesampling in avi- S•BLE¾,C.G. !96!. The electrophoreticpatterns of an electrophoreticstudies. avian egg-white proteins as taxonomic charac- We are grateful to Steven Bloom,Irene Brown, Mike ters. Ibis 102: 2!5-284. Denison, Tom Gavin, JoshHamilton, and Jerry Wald~ SMITH, J. K., & E.G. ZIMMERMAN. !976. Biochemical vogel for their help in obtaining the birds. Scott geneticsand evolution of North American black- Camazine and Paul Sherman made many helpful birds,family Icteridae.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. commentson earlier drafts of the manuscript.Fund- 53B: 319-324. ing was provided in part by a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Researchto J. E. Marsden. This work was per- Received14 February1983, accepted25 July 1983. Food-nicheRelationships Between Great Horned Owls and Common Barn-Owls in Eastern Washington RICHARDL. KNIGHTl AND RONALDE. JACKMAN2 •Departmentof WildlifeEcology, University of Wisconsin,Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA, and 2681749th NE, Seattle,Washington 98115 USA GreatHorned Owls (Bubovirginianus) and Common ships from our analysisof 622 Common Barn-Owl Barn-Owls(Tyto alba)have recentlybecome sympat- pellets,from 6 nestingand 2 roostingsites, and 234 ric in the PacificNorthwest (Stewart !980, Smithand Great Horned Owl pellets, from 4 nesting and 3 Knight !98!) and provide an opportunity for exam- roostingsites, collectedbetween October 1977-June ining resourcepartitioning between two membersc•f .- 1979•in EsquatzelCoulee, Franklin County, Wasl•-._ the samefeeding guild. We quantifieddiet relation- ington.The studyarea and its raptorpopulations are 176 ShortCommunications [Auk,Vol. 101 described in Knight and Smith (1982). Fitch (1947), (Kritzman 1977: 107) is temporally unavailable for Rudolph (1978), and Jaksi• and Y/tfiez (1980) have the strictly nocturnal Common Barn-Owl (Marti 1974, examinedfood-niche relationships between these two Rudolph 1978). Common Barn-Owls are the fourth specieswhen sympatricin California and Chile, pro- most important prey item, in terms of total prey bio- viding the opportunity for comparisons. mass, in the diet of Great Horned Owls. Prey remains in pellets were identified to species MPS of Great Horned Owls (œ _+ 2 SE = 55.24 _+ level, and mean fresh weights were obtained from 9.31 g, n = 872) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) the Bureauof Land Management (1979). The follow- than MPS of Common Barn-Owls (27.44 _+ 1.70 g, ing parametersfor eachowl specieswere calculated: n = 2628). This was the result of Great Horned Owls (1) mean prey size (MPS) (Herrera and Jaksi• 1980), preying on larger prey items such as rabbits and (2) food-niche breadth (Levins 1968: 43), and (3) food- Common Barn-Owls. The food-niche breadth of Great niche overlap (Pianka 1974: 2142). The numbers of Horned Owls was 4.12, considerablygreater than the prey speciesin each owl species'diet were used as 2.28 of Common Barn-Owls, suggestingthat Great entries for computationof niche breadthsand'over- Horned Owls apply a more uniform predation pres- laps. sure over a wider range of animals.Food-niche over- Small mammals were the major prey of Great lap was 0.97 (of a maximumof 1.00). This is largely Horned Owls and Common Barn-Owls at the Es- due to the importance of northern pocket gophers quatzelCoulee study area, both in percentageof total and GreatBasin pocket mice in both owl species'diets. prey items (91.1% and 97.8%, respectively) and in On our study area, these two speciesshow a high percentageof total prey biomass(77.9% and 98.3%) degree of ecologicaloverlap in several traits other (Table 1). Mammals compriseda lower percentageof than diet. Strongestevidence of habitat overlap is the total prey biomassin the diet of Great Horned Owls presenceof Common Barn-Owls in the diet of Great than of Common Barn-Owls (X2 = 162.34, P < 0.001). Horned Owls (Herrera and I-Iiraldo 1976). Addition- Two speciesof mammals, northern pocket gopher ally, Common Barn-Owls and Great Horned Owls (scientific names given in Table 1) and Great Basin showed few or no differences in nest-site structure, pocket mouse,comprised over half of the total prey mean nest height, mean nest-structureheight, land- items in the dietsof both owl species(50.1% for Great use patterns near nesting sites,and distancesof nest Horned Owl and 69.3% for Common Barn-Owl), as sites to human activity (Knight and Smith 1982). well as a major portion of total prey biomass(42.2% Nesting Great Horned Owls exhibited regular and and 73.9%). Rabbits were the third most important Common Barn-Owls random intraspecific distribu- prey species,in terms of biomass,in the diet of Great tions. Their interspecific pattern was random, how- Horned Owls, although they were not found in ever, indicating no interspecific territoriality. There Common Barn-Owl pellets. BecauseCommon Barn- were indications of ecological differences between Owls are smaller than Great Horned Owls (Marti the two species. Common Barn-Owls may utilize 1974), they may have difficulty in capturing rabbits habitats not frequented by Great Horned Owls, as (Jaksi• and Y/tftez 1980). Common Barn-Owls do oc- evidencedby differencesin prey species(e.g. house casionallyeat rabbits (Fitch 1947,Marti 1974);there- mouse).Common Barn-Owlsare strictly nocturnaland fore, an alternative explanation for the absenceof hunt mainly on the wing, whereas Great Horned rabbits as a Common Barn-Owl prey item in our study Owls are more crepuscular and hunt primarily by may be that the largely crepuscularNuttall cottontail flights from perches(Marti 1974, Rudolph 1978). Fi- TABLE1. Prey items from 234 pelletsof Great Horned Owls and from 622 pelletsof CommonBarn-Owls in EsquatzelCoulee, eastern Washington. Common names are in parentheses. Great Horned Owl Common Barn-Owl Number Total prey Number Total prey Weight of prey biomass of prey biomass Prey (g) (%) (%) (%) (%) Mammals Sylvilagusnuttallii 514 1.3 12.4 -- -- (Nuttall cottontail) Spermophiluswashingtoni 172 0.1 0.4 -- -- (Washington ground squirrel) Thomomystalpoides 200 7.7 29.7 5.44 39.3 (northern pocket gopher) January 1984] Short Communications 177 TAIlLE 1. Continued. Great Horned Owl Common Barn-Owl Number Total prey Number Total prey Weight of prey biomass of prey biomass Prey (g) (%) (%) (%) (%) Perognathusparvus 15 43.1 12.5 63.85 34.6 (Great Basin pocket mouse) Dipodomysordii 53 1.4 1.4 0.53 1.0 (Ord's kangaroo rat) Reithrodontomysmegalotis 11 1.5 0.3 3.39 1.3 (western harvest mouse) Peromyscusmaniculatus 19 16.9 6.2 13.77 9.5 (deer mouse) Neotoma cinerea 310 0.3 2.1 0.04 0.4
Recommended publications
  • Mammals of the California Desert

    Mammals of the California Desert

    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
  • Wildlife Ruby Lake Natillntllwildlife Refuge

    Wildlife Ruby Lake Natillntllwildlife Refuge

    I 49. 44/2: R 82/3/993 P RLE Wildlife Ruby lake NatillntllWildlife Refuge ZIMMERMAN LIBRARY UNIV. OF NEW MEXteo FEB 1 0 1994 U.S. Regional Depos1to A Refuge for Nesting and Migrating Waterfowl and Other Wildlife The Habitat Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge was established in The refuge, at an elevation of 6,000 feet, consists of an 1938. It encompasses 37,632 acres at the south end of extensive bulrush marsh interspersed with pockets of Ruby Valley. This land was once covered by a 200 foot open water. Fish are abundant. Islands scattered deep, 300,800-acre lake known as Franklin Lake. Today throughout provide good nesting habitat for many bird 12,000 acres of marsh remain on the refuge. Just north of species. the refuge, a 15,000-acre seasonal wetland is now referred to as Franklin Lake. Over 200 springs flow into the marsh along its west border _...)/ creating riparian habitat which is used by many songbirds, To Elko �� and Welle snipe, rail and small mammals. They also provide a water FRANKLIN source for larger mammals. With slight increases in LAKE elevation, wet meadows gradate into grasslands and sagebrush-rabbitbrush habitat. Pinon pines and juniper cover the slopes of the Ruby Mountains that rise to 11,000 feet along the west side of the refuge. Canyons provide habitat for a variety of wildlife. Rock cliffs provide raptors with nesting and perching sites. A mountainside of dead trees, home for ROAD cavity dwelling birds, was the result of a 1979 wildfire. BRESSMAN CABIN LOOP MAIN BOAT LANDING -4,__,,� ·�I! I N � 0 3 Miles 0 2 4 Kilometer� RANCH dead pinon tree General Key BIRDS bam ,wallow � Season 6 The following bird list includes 207 species observed on Sp - Spring (March through May) or near the refuge.
  • A Comprehensive Species-Level Molecular Phylogeny of the New World

    A Comprehensive Species-Level Molecular Phylogeny of the New World

    YMPEV 4758 No. of Pages 19, Model 5G 2 December 2013 Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution xxx (2013) xxx–xxx 1 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev 5 6 3 A comprehensive species-level molecular phylogeny of the New World 4 blackbirds (Icteridae) a,⇑ a a b c d 7 Q1 Alexis F.L.A. Powell , F. Keith Barker , Scott M. Lanyon , Kevin J. Burns , John Klicka , Irby J. Lovette 8 a Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, and Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 9 55108, USA 10 b Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA 11 c Barrick Museum of Natural History, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA 12 d Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14950, USA 1314 15 article info abstract 3117 18 Article history: The New World blackbirds (Icteridae) are among the best known songbirds, serving as a model clade in 32 19 Received 5 June 2013 comparative studies of morphological, ecological, and behavioral trait evolution. Despite wide interest in 33 20 Revised 11 November 2013 the group, as yet no analysis of blackbird relationships has achieved comprehensive species-level sam- 34 21 Accepted 18 November 2013 pling or found robust support for most intergeneric relationships. Using mitochondrial gene sequences 35 22 Available online xxxx from all 108 currently recognized species and six additional distinct lineages, together with strategic 36 sampling of four nuclear loci and whole mitochondrial genomes, we were able to resolve most relation- 37 23 Keywords: ships with high confidence.
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Terrestrial Vertebrates

    USGS DDS-43, Status of Terrestrial Vertebrates

    DAVID M. GRABER National Biological Service Sequoia and Kings Canyon Field Station Three Rivers, California 25 Status of Terrestrial Vertebrates ABSTRACT The terrestrial vertebrate wildlife of the Sierra Nevada is represented INTRODUCTION by about 401 regularly occurring species, including three local extir- There are approximately 401 species of terrestrial vertebrates pations in the 20th century. The mountain range includes about two- that use the Sierra Nevada now or in recent times according thirds of the bird and mammal species and about half the reptiles to the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System and amphibians in the State of California. This is principally because (CWHR) (California Department of Fish and Game 1994) (ap- of its great extent, and because its foothill woodlands and chaparral, pendix 25.1). Of these, thirteen are essentially restricted to mid-elevation forests, and alpine vegetation reflect, in structure and the Sierra in California (one of these is an alien; i.e. not native function if not species, habitats found elsewhere in the State. About to the Sierra Nevada); 278 (eight aliens) include the Sierra in 17% of the Sierran vertebrate species are considered at risk by state their principal range; and another 110 (six aliens) use the Si- or federal agencies; this figure is only slightly more than half the spe- erra as a minor portion of their range. Included in the 401 are cies at risk for the state as a whole. This relative security is a function 232 species of birds; 112 species of mammals; thirty-two spe- of the smaller proportion of Sierran habitats that have been exten- cies of reptiles; and twenty-five species of amphibians (ap- sively modified.
  • Fraga Ms-706.Fm

    Fraga Ms-706.Fm

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CONICET Digital SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 19: 299–303, 2008 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society NOTES ON THE NESTING OF CHOPI BLACKBIRDS (GNORIMOPSAR CHOPI) IN ARGENTINA AND PARAGUAY, WITH DATA ON COOPERATIVE BREEDING AND BROOD PARASITISM BY SCREAMING COWBIRDS (MOLOTHRUS RUFOAXILLARIS) Rosendo M. Fraga CICYTTP, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Matteri y España, (3105) Diamante, Entre Ríos, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] Notas sobre la nidificación del Chopí (Gnorimopsar chopi) en Argentina y Paraguay, con datos de cría cooperativa y de parasitismo de cría por el Tordo Pico Corto (Molothrus rufoaxillaris). Key words: Chopi Blackbirds, Gnorimopsar chopi, nesting, cooperative breeding, Screaming Cowbird, Molothrus rufoaxillaris. The Chopi Blackbird (Gnorimopsar chopi) is an northeastern Argentina (Corrientes and Mis- icterid endemic to South America (Jaramillo iones provinces) and Paraguay, between 1995 & Burke 1999) and a member of the South and 2007. My data show this icterid to be a American quiscaline clade, a monophyletic cooperative breeder (Brown 1987), as individ- group defined by DNA data (Johnson & uals other than a single pair aid in chick care. Lanyon 1999, Cadena et al. 2004). This icterid Also, I add further information on its host- is found from northeastern Brazil and south- parasite interactions with Screaming Cow- eastern Peru to northern Argentina and Uru- birds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris) in Argentina and guay (Jaramillo & Burke 1999). It is usually Paraguay (Sick 1985, Fraga 1996). subdivided into three subspecies with consid- I obtained most of my information on erable variation in body size (Jaramillo & Chopi Blackbirds while carrying field research Burke 1999), but only the nominate subspe- on endangered grassland birds from eastern cies occurs in eastern Argentina and Paraguay.
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest

    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern, Sequoia National Forest

    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sequoia National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Biologist Planner Regional Office, Sequoia National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program For: Sequoia National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
  • Wildlife Species List Mourning Dove Zenaida Macroura

    Wildlife Species List Mourning Dove Zenaida Macroura

    Wildlife Species List Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Order: Strigiformes (Nocturnal Flesh Eaters) Northeast Nevada – Units 106 Family: Tytonidae (Barn Owls) Barn Owl Tyto alba (Subalpine Coniferous, P-J, Sagebrush Family: Strigidae (Owls) Steppe, Salt Desert Scrub Habitat, Some Flammulated Owl Otus flammeolus Western Screech-Owl Otus kennicottii Limited Riparian) Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus Northern Pygmy-Owl Glaucidium gnoma Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia Long-eared Owl Asio otus Birds Northern Saw-whet Owl Aegolius acadicus Order: Ciconiiformes (Long-leg Waders, etc) Order: Caprimulgiformes (Night Jars) Family: Cathartidae (New World Vultures) Family: Caprimulgidae (Goatsuckers) Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor California Condor Gymnogyps californianus(L.E.) Common Poorwill Phalaenoptilus nuttallii Order: Falconiformes (Diurnal Flesh Eaters) Order: Apodiformes (Small Fast Fliers) Family: Accipitridae (Hawks, Eagles, Osprey) Family: Apodidae (Swifts) Bald Eagle Haliaetus leucocephalus White-throated Swift Aeronautes saxatalis Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Family: Trochilidae (Hummingbirds) Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus Black-chinned Hummingbird Archilochus alexandri Cooper’s Hawk Accipiter cooperii Broad-tailed Hummingbird Selasphorus platycercus Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus Order: Piciformes (Cavity Builders) Swainson's Hawk Buteo swainsoni Family: Picidae (Woodpeckers) Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis Lewis’
  • Rare Feeding Behavior of Great-Tailed Grackles (Quiscalus Mexicanus) in the Extreme Habitat of Death Valley

    Rare Feeding Behavior of Great-Tailed Grackles (Quiscalus Mexicanus) in the Extreme Habitat of Death Valley

    The Open Ornithology Journal, 2010, 3, 101-104 101 Open Access Rare Feeding Behavior of Great-Tailed Grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) in the Extreme Habitat of Death Valley Stefanie Grabrucker and Andreas M. Grabrucker* University Ulm, 89069 Ulm, Germany Abstract: During the twentieth century, the Great-tailed Grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus) underwent a rapid and large- scale range expansion, extending its northern limits from Texas in 1900 to 21 states in the US and 3 Canadian provinces by the end of the century. This explosive growth correlated with human-induced habitat changes. To investigate adaptations that might explain their expansion into even extreme habitats, a small number of Great-tailed Grackles were observed in Death Valley, CA. We noticed that these birds displayed a rare feeding behavior, i.e. picking dead insects from the license plates of parked vehicles. All birds used the same technique in obtaining the food and the behavior was displayed by both males and females. It was estimated that this food resource has a major contribution to the daily food intake. No other bird species sharing the same habitat showed this behavior although American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) had the possibility to watch the Great-tailed Grackles behavior. Keywords: Great-tailed Grackle, Feeding behavior, Death Valley, Adaptation, License plate. INTRODUCTION recorded with a temperature above 37,8° C. The summer of 1996 had 40 days over 48,9° C, and 105 days over 43,4° C Great-tailed Grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) were [16]. Heat exposure significantly decreases live weight gain, investigated with regard to their potential to adapt and feed efficiency, and carcass weight in birds like quails survive in extreme habitats like Death Valley, CA.
  • Didelphis Virginiana) As a Host for Sarcocystis Debonei from Cowbirds (Molothrus Ater) and Grackles (Cassidix Mexicanus, Quiscalus Quiscula)

    Didelphis Virginiana) As a Host for Sarcocystis Debonei from Cowbirds (Molothrus Ater) and Grackles (Cassidix Mexicanus, Quiscalus Quiscula)

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 4-1978 The Opossum (Didelphis virginiana) as a Host for Sarcocystis debonei from Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and Grackles (Cassidix mexicanus, Quiscalus quiscula) Donald Duszynski University of New Mexico, [email protected] Edith D. Box University of Texas Medical Branch Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Duszynski, Donald and Box, Edith D., "The Opossum (Didelphis virginiana) as a Host for Sarcocystis debonei from Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and Grackles (Cassidix mexicanus, Quiscalus quiscula)" (1978). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 129. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/129 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. J. Parasitol., 64(2), 1978, pp. 326-329 ? American Society of Parasitologists 1978 THE OPOSSUM (DIDELPHISVIRGINIANA) AS A HOST FOR SARCOCYSTISDEBONEI FROM COWBIRDS (MOLOTHRUS ATER) AND GRACKLES(CASSIDIX MEXICANUS, QUISCALUS QUISCULA) Donald W. Duszynski* and Edith D. Boxt ABSTRACT: Sarcocystis-infected muscles from ducks, cowbirds, and grackles were fed to cats, opossums, rats, and a dog. Only the opossum (Didelphis virginiana) was a suitable definitive host. All opossums that were fed Sarcocystis-infected cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and grackles (Cassidix mexicanus and Quiscalus quiscula) passed sporocysts in their feces.
  • Species List February 20 ‒ 28, 2019 | Written by Bob Meinke

    Species List February 20 ‒ 28, 2019 | Written by Bob Meinke

    Southern Belize: Birding & Nature | Species List February 20 ‒ 28, 2019 | Written by Bob Meinke Guide Bob Meinke, with expert local lodge naturalists Marvin and Steven, and 9 participants: Kelly, Isaac, Lenore, Harold, Cindy, Richelle, Beth, Nancy, and Joe SUMMARY We enjoyed a scenic and productive trip, starting with the vast freshwater wetlands at Crooked Tree Lagoon, transitioning on to the montane woodlands of the Mountain Pine Ridge, and ending our tour in the broadleaf forests and mangroves of Toledo District at the southern tip of Belize. Working our way down the length of the country increased our exposure to a wide range of habitats, and with it came a nice assortment of resident and migrant bird species as well as other wildlife. Highlights among the resident species included King Vulture, Bare-crowned Antbird, Black-and-white Owl, Yucatan Jay, White-winged Becard, Ruddy Woodcreeper, Eye-ringed Flatbill, Violet Sabrewing, three species of Trogon, and five species of Kingfisher (with multiple, close-in views of American Pygmy a surprising bonus). And while not unexpected, Keel-billed Toucan, Collared Aracari, Bare-throated Tiger Heron, Montezuma Oropendola, Golden -headed Tanager, Barred Antshrike, and Squirrel Cuckoo were all exquisite reminders of the rich colors and morphological diversity that characterize the avifauna of the Neotropics. North American migrants were also plentiful during our visit, and among the many warblers encountered, Blue-winged, Worm-eating, and Prothonotary stood out among the 21 overwintering species we recorded, most of which were just entering full breeding plumage as they readied for their journey north to the U.S.
  • NEWS and NOTES by Paul Hess

    NEWS and NOTES by Paul Hess

    NEWS AND NOTES by Paul Hess “Lilian’s” Meadowlark für Ornithologie 135:28), but no details about the findings have been published. Ornithologist Harry C. Oberholser was intrigued by mead - At last, a large-scale genetic report by F. Keith Barker, Ar - owlarks collected in 1929 near Arizona’s Huachuca Moun - ion J. Vandergon, and Scott M. Lanyon arrived in 2008 tains, because their size, structure, and plumage differed (Auk 125:869–879). They examined two mitochondrial from those of the Western Meadowlark and from known DNA (mtDNA) genes and one nuclear locus in 14 Eastern variations of Eastern Meadowlark. In 1930 he described the Meadowlark subspecies throughout the North American, specimens as a new Eastern Meadowlark subspecies and Central American, and South American range. named it lilianae to honor Lilian Baldwin, who had donat - The results indicate a long history of evolutionary diver - ed the collection ( Scientific Publications of the Cleveland Mu - gence between lilianae and all except one other Eastern seum of Natural History 1:83–124). Meadowlark subspecies, auropectoralis of central and We now know it as “Lilian’s” Meadowlark, of desert grasslands in the southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico, where it is distinguishable from Western Meadowlark with careful study by eye and ear. In identification guides, lilianae re - ceived little attention and no illustration until the National Geographic Field Guide to the Birds of North America in 1983. Kevin J. Zimmer of - fered tips in Birding (August 1984, pp. 155–156) and in his books The Western Bird Watcher (Prentice-Hall 1985) and Birding in the American West (Cornell University Press 2000).
  • Isospora Guaxi N. Sp. and Isosp

    Isospora Guaxi N. Sp. and Isosp

    Syst Parasitol (2017) 94:151–157 DOI 10.1007/s11230-016-9688-y Some remarks on the distribution and dispersion of Coccidia from icterid birds in South America: Isospora guaxi n. sp. and Isospora bellicosa Upton, Stamper & Whitaker, 1995 (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the red-rumped cacique Cacicus haemorrhous (L.) (Passeriformes: Icteridae) in southeastern Brazil Lidiane Maria da Silva . Mariana Borges Rodrigues . Irlane Faria de Pinho . Bruno do Bomfim Lopes . Hermes Ribeiro Luz . Ildemar Ferreira . Carlos Wilson Gomes Lopes . Bruno Pereira Berto Received: 27 May 2016 / Accepted: 19 November 2016 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract A new species of coccidian, Isospora guaxi residuum are absent, but a polar granule is present. n. sp., and Isospora bellicosa Upton, Stamper & Sporocysts are ellipsoidal, measuring on average Whitaker, 1995 (Protozoa: Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) 19.3 9 13.8 lm. Stieda body is knob-like and sub- are recorded from red-rumped caciques Cacicus haem- Stieda body is prominent and compartmentalized. orrhous (L.) in the Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, Brazil. Sporocyst residuum is composed of scattered granules. Isospora guaxi n. sp. has sub-spheroidal oo¨cysts, mea- Sporozoites are vermiform, with one refractile body and suring on average 30.9 9 29.0 lm, with smooth, bi- anucleus.Isospora bellicosa has sub-spheroidal to layered wall c.1.9 lm thick. Micropyle and oo¨cyst ovoidal oo¨cysts, measuring on average 27.1 9 25.0 lm, with smooth, bi-layered wall c.1.5 lm thick. Micropyle and oo¨cyst residuum are absent, but one or two polar L. M. da Silva Á M.