Parasitic Flatworms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasitic Flatworms Parasitic Flatworms Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Immunology and Physiology This page intentionally left blank Parasitic Flatworms Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Immunology and Physiology Edited by Aaron G. Maule Parasitology Research Group School of Biology and Biochemistry Queen’s University of Belfast Belfast UK and Nikki J. Marks Parasitology Research Group School of Biology and Biochemistry Queen’s University of Belfast Belfast UK CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Office CABI North American Office Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org ©CAB International 2006. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Parasitic flatworms : molecular biology, biochemistry, immunology and physiology / edited by Aaron G. Maule and Nikki J. Marks. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-85199-027-9 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-85199-027-4 (alk. paper) 1. Platyhelminthes. [DNLM: 1. Platyhelminths. 2. Cestode Infections. QX 350 P224 2005] I. Maule, Aaron G. II. Marks, Nikki J. III. Tittle. QL391.P7P368 2005 616.9'62--dc22 2005016094 ISBN-10: 0-85199-027-4 ISBN-13: 978-0-85199-027-9 Typeset by SPi, Pondicherry, India. Printed and bound in the UK by Biddles Ltd, King’s Lynn. Contents Contributors xv Preface xix Access to Colour Illustrations xx PART I PHYLOGENY, GENETICS AND TRANSCRIPTOMES 1 The Evolution of Parasitism in Flatworms 1 D.T.J. Littlewood Introduction 1 Parasitism in the Platyhelminthes 6 The Origins of Obligate Parasitism – The Appearance of the Neodermata 7 When did the Neodermata appear? 12 The Neodermata – advantages of a new skin 13 The Radiation of the Parasitic Flatworms 15 Radiation of the Monogenea 16 Radiation of the Cestoda 20 Radiation of the Aspidogastrea 23 Radiation of the Digenea 24 Concluding Remarks 27 Acknowledgements 30 References 31 2 Genomes and Genomics of Parasitic Flatworms 37 D.A. Johnston Introduction 38 Genome Features 40 Genome size 40 Genome composition 42 DNA methylation 42 Repeat sequences 43 Integration of host DNA sequences 46 v vi Contents Genome instability 47 Gene processing 48 Karyotype Features 50 Chromosome number 50 Ploidy 50 Sex chromosomes 52 Recombination frequency 53 Telomeres 54 Mitochondrial Genomes 54 General characteristics 54 Gene order 58 Genetic code 59 Maternal inheritance 61 Flatworm Genomics 64 Rationale 64 Gene discovery and transcriptome analysis 64 Physical mapping 66 Chromosome mapping 66 Genome sequencing 67 Concluding Remarks 67 Acknowledgements 68 References 68 3 Genetic Discrimination of Echinococcus Species and Strains 81 D.P. McManus Introduction 81 Genetic Variation in Echinococcus 82 Identification of Echinococcus Isolates Using Molecular Genetic Techniques 84 RFLP/RAPD analysis 84 PCR-amplified DNA sequences 84 Mutation scanning methods 85 Microsatellite markers 85 Molecular Identification of E. granulosus Strains 85 Sheep–dog (Genotype 1) and horse–dog (Genotype 4 – E. equinus) strains 85 Cattle–dog strain (Genotype 5 – E. ortleppi)87 Camel–dog strain (Genotype 6) 89 Pig–dog strains (Genotypes 7 and 9) 89 Cervid strains (Genotypes 8 and 10) 89 Detection of Echinococcus Nucleic Acids in Clinical Samples 90 DNA Detection of Infection in Definitive and Intermediate Hosts 90 Concluding Remarks 91 Acknowledgements 92 References 92 4 Ribosomal DNA Variation in Parasitic Flatworms 96 D. Blair Introduction 96 Nuclear Ribosomal Operons 98 Intergenic spacers 100 Internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) 102 Intra-individual variation and repeat sequences 103 Contents vii Intra- and interspecific variation 107 Functional motifs 108 Secondary structure 108 Small and Large Subunit Genes 109 Mitochondrial Ribosomal Genes 115 Hybrids 116 Concluding Remarks 117 References 117 5 Genetic Studies on Monogeneans with Emphasis on Gyrodactylus 124 ∨ C.O. Cunningham and I. Matejusová Introduction 124 Difficulties in Molecular Studies of Monogenea 125 Molecular Markers for Monogenean Species 126 The rRNA genes and spacers 126 The SSU (18S) rRNA gene 127 The rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 127 The rRNA intergenic spacer (IGS) 129 Large Subunit (LSU) (28S) rRNA gene 129 Other Regions of the Monogenean Genome 130 Monogenean Species Concept and Species Complexes 130 Molecular Analysis within Monogenean Species 131 Other Genetic Studies in Monogenea 132 Concluding Remarks 133 References 133 6 The Schistosome Transcriptome 138 S. Verjovski-Almeida and R. DeMarco Introduction 138 The Transcriptome Projects 139 Transcriptome Comparisons 139 Evolutionary Implications 141 Novel Transcripts 141 Receptors and Host–Parasite Interaction 142 Immune Evasion 142 Sex Differences 143 Genome Data 143 Novel Drug Targets 143 Vaccines 144 Trans-splicing 145 Retrotransposable Elements 145 Functional Genomics 145 Concluding Remarks 146 References 146 7 Transgenic Flatworms 149 C.G. Grevelding Introduction 149 The Planarian Model 150 Trematodes and Cestodes 151 Transformation Techniques for Schistosomes 153 viii Contents Particle bombardment 153 The PDS-1000/He particle bombardment system 155 Reporter gene activity in bombarded schistosomes 156 Stable Transformation 162 Cestodes, on the Way to Transgenesis 164 Concluding Remarks 165 Acknowledgements 166 References 166 PART II IMMUNOBIOLOGY, HOST–PARASITE INTERACTION AND CONTROL 8 Immunobiology of Schistosomes 174 S.G. Forrester and E.J. Pearce Introduction 174 Host–Parasite Molecular Interactions 175 How Schistosomes Evade the Host Immune System 176 Skin stage parasites 176 Lung stage parasites 178 Adult parasites 178 Host Immune Response to Schistosome Infection (Th1 versus Th2) 179 Potential Players in Th2 Response Induction during a Schistosome Infection 181 Chemotherapy – An Integral Role for the Immune Response 183 Immunotherapy 183 Concluding Remarks 184 Acknowledgements 185 References 185 9 Cestode Infection: Immunological Considerations from Host and Tapeworm Perspectives 193 D.M. McKay and R.A. Webb Introduction 193 Cestode Parasites 194 Immunology – The Basics 195 The Intestine and Immune Responses 197 Create an inhospitable environment 197 Mobilize an active immune response 198 Specifics of the Host Response to Cestode Infection 199 Parenteral infections of cestodes 199 Host response to the oncosphere 199 Resistance to parenteral metacestodes 200 Lumenal Infections: The Immune Response to Hymenolepidid Cestodes 202 Cestode Infections and the Immune Response – Where Do We Go from Here? 203 Evasion and Subversion of the Host Response 204 The Beneficial Tapeworm 204 Concluding Remarks 205 Acknowledgements 206 References 206 10 Signal Transduction at the Host–Parasite Interface 210 T.P.Yoshino, J.J. Vermeire and J.E. Humphries Introduction 210 Tegumental Involvement in Signal Transduction: Perception and Reality 211 Contents ix Elements of Platyhelminth Signal Transduction Systems 213 Molecular and EST data 213 Platyhelminth signalling proteins 214 Platyhelminth Signal Transduction Pathways: Tegument and Beyond 218 Transforming growth factor receptor (TGFR) pathway 218 TGF-β receptor signalling in schistosomes 219 Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway 220 EGFR signalling: roles in the host–parasite relationship 220 G Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) 222 GPCRs in parasitic platyhelminths 222 Concluding Remarks 223 Acknowledgements 223 References 224 11 Parasite Effects on the Snail Host Transcriptome 228 M. Knight and N. Raghavan Introduction 228 Effect of Parasite Infection on the Snail Host: Towards a Molecular Understanding 230 Innate immunity 230 Biochemical involvement 231 Parasite-induced changes in gene expression 233 Parasite-induced changes in snail neurobiology 237 Concluding Remarks 238 Acknowledgements 238 References 239 12 Developments in the Chemotherapy of Parasitic Flatworms 243 G.C. Coles Introduction 243 Parasites of Animals 244 Infections of Humans 245 Adult tapeworms 246 Larval tapeworms 246 Taenia solium 246 Echinococcus granulosus 246 Echinococcus multilocularis 247 New Anti-parasitics: Nitazoxanide 247 Mode of Action of Fasciolicides and Cestodicides 247 Resistance 248 Resistance in Fasciola 249 Resistance in monogeneans 249 Resistance in cestodes 249 Detection of resistance 250 Concluding Remarks 250 References 251 13 Drug Resistance in Schistosomes 256 T.A. Day and S. Botros Introduction 256 Schistosomiasis Chemotherapy 257 Impact of Praziquantel 257 Challenges to Detecting and Monitoring Anti-schistosomal Resistance 258 x Contents There is a high background of drug failure 258 Methods for detecting infection are variable 258 Factors other than resistance can produce drug failure 258 It is difficult to substantiate a decreased response in the worms 259 Praziquantel’s mechanism of action is not known 259 Defining resistance 260 Cases of Drug Resistance in Schistosomes 260 Resistance to Hycanthone and Oxamniquine 260 Resistance to Praziquantel 261 Senegal 261 Egypt 262 Concluding Remarks 264 References 265 14 Praziquantel: Mechanism of Action 269 R.M. Greenberg Introduction 269 Praziquantel Mode of Action 270 Voltage-gated Ca2+ Channels
Recommended publications
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Thousand Parasites Under The
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Departament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Tesis Doctoral Twenty thousand parasites under the sea: a multidisciplinary approach to parasite communities of deep-dwelling fishes from the slopes of the Balearic Sea (NW Mediterranean) Tesis doctoral presentada por Sara Maria Dallarés Villar para optar al título de Doctora en Acuicultura bajo la dirección de la Dra. Maite Carrassón López de Letona, del Dr. Francesc Padrós Bover y de la Dra. Montserrat Solé Rovira. La presente tesis se ha inscrito en el programa de doctorado en Acuicultura, con mención de calidad, de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Los directores Maite Carrassón Francesc Padrós Montserrat Solé López de Letona Bover Rovira Universitat Autònoma de Universitat Autònoma de Institut de Ciències Barcelona Barcelona del Mar (CSIC) La tutora La doctoranda Maite Carrassón Sara Maria López de Letona Dallarés Villar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra, diciembre de 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cuando miro atrás, al comienzo de esta tesis, me doy cuenta de cuán enriquecedora e importante ha sido para mí esta etapa, a todos los niveles.
    [Show full text]
  • BIO 475 - Parasitology Spring 2009 Stephen M
    BIO 475 - Parasitology Spring 2009 Stephen M. Shuster Northern Arizona University http://www4.nau.edu/isopod Lecture 12 Platyhelminth Systematics-New Euplatyhelminthes Superclass Acoelomorpha a. Simple pharynx, no gut. b. Usually free-living in marine sands. 3. Also parasitic/commensal on echinoderms. 1 Euplatyhelminthes 2. Superclass Rhabditophora - with rhabdites Euplatyhelminthes 2. Superclass Rhabditophora - with rhabdites a. Class Rhabdocoela 1. Rod shaped gut (hence the name) 2. Often endosymbiotic with Crustacea or other invertebrates. Euplatyhelminthes 3. Example: Syndesmis a. Lives in gut of sea urchins, entirely on protozoa. 2 Euplatyhelminthes Class Temnocephalida a. Temnocephala 1. Ectoparasitic on crayfish 5. Class Tricladida a. like planarians b. Bdelloura 1. live in gills of Limulus Class Temnocephalida 4. Life cycles are poorly known. a. Seem to have slightly increased reproductive capacity. b. Retain many morphological characters that permit free-living existence. Euplatyhelminth Systematics 3 Parasitic Platyhelminthes Old Scheme Characters: 1. Tegumental cell extensions 2. Prohaptor 3. Opisthaptor Superclass Neodermata a. Loss of characters associated with free-living existence. 1. Ciliated larval epidermis, adult epidermis is syncitial. Superclass Neodermata b. Major Classes - will consider each in detail: 1. Class Trematoda a. Subclass Aspidobothrea b. Subclass Digenea 2. Class Monogenea 3. Class Cestoidea 4 Euplatyhelminth Systematics Euplatyhelminth Systematics Class Cestoidea Two Subclasses: a. Subclass Cestodaria 1. Order Gyrocotylidea 2. Order Amphilinidea b. Subclass Eucestoda 5 Euplatyhelminth Systematics Parasitic Flatworms a. Relative abundance related to variety of parasitic habitats. b. Evidence that such characters lead to great speciation c. isolated populations, unique selective environments. Parasitic Flatworms d. Also, very good organisms for examination of: 1. Complex life cycles; selection favoring them 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Luth Wfu 0248D 10922.Pdf
    SCALE-DEPENDENT VARIATION IN MOLECULAR AND ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF INFECTION FOR ENDOHELMINTHS FROM CENTRARCHID FISHES BY KYLE E. LUTH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADAUTE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology May 2016 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Gerald W. Esch, Ph.D., Advisor Michael V. K. Sukhdeo, Ph.D., Chair T. Michael Anderson, Ph.D. Herman E. Eure, Ph.D. Erik C. Johnson, Ph.D. Clifford W. Zeyl, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my PI, Dr. Gerald Esch, for all of the insight, all of the discussions, all of the critiques (not criticisms) of my works, and for the rides to campus when the North Carolina weather decided to drop rain on my stubborn head. The numerous lively debates, exchanges of ideas, voicing of opinions (whether solicited or not), and unerring support, even in the face of my somewhat atypical balance of service work and dissertation work, will not soon be forgotten. I would also like to acknowledge and thank the former Master, and now Doctor, Michael Zimmermann; friend, lab mate, and collecting trip shotgun rider extraordinaire. Although his need of SPF 100 sunscreen often put our collecting trips over budget, I could not have asked for a more enjoyable, easy-going, and hard-working person to spend nearly 2 months and 25,000 miles of fishing filled days and raccoon, gnat, and entrail-filled nights. You are a welcome camping guest any time, especially if you do as good of a job attracting scorpions and ants to yourself (and away from me) as you did on our trips.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curriculum Vitae Stephen S. Curran, Ph.D. Department of Coastal
    Curriculum vitae Stephen S. Curran, Ph.D. Department of Coastal Sciences The University of Southern Mississippi Gulf Coast Research Laboratory 703 East Beach Drive Phone: (228) 238-0208 Ocean Springs, MS 39564 Email: [email protected] Research and Teaching Interests: I am an organismal biologist interested in the biodiversity of metazoan parasitic animals. I study their taxonomy using traditional microscopic and histological techniques and their genetic interrelationships and systematics using ribosomal DNA sequences. I also investigate the effects of extrinsic factors on aquatic environments by using parasite prevalence and abundance as a proxy for total biodiversity in aquatic communities and for assessing food web dynamics. I am also interested in the epidemiology of viral diseases of crustaceans. University Teaching Experience: •Instructor for Parasites of Marine Animals Summer class, University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (2011-present). •Co-Instructor (with Richard Heard) for Marine Invertebrate Zoology, University of Southern Mississippi, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (2007). •Intern Mentor, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory. I’ve instructed 16 interns during (2003, 2007- present). •Graduate Teaching Assistant for Animal Parasitology, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (Spring 1995). •Graduate Teaching Assistant for Introductory Biology for Majors, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (Fall 1994). Positions: •Assistant Research
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Systematics and the Evolutionary History of Some Intestinal Flatworm Parasites (Trematoda: Digenea: Plagiorchi01dea) of Anurans
    PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS AND THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF SOME INTESTINAL FLATWORM PARASITES (TREMATODA: DIGENEA: PLAGIORCHI01DEA) OF ANURANS by RICHARD TERENCE 0'GRADY B.Sc, University Of British Columbia, 1978 M.Sc, McGill University, 1981 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department Of Zoology We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA March 1987 © Richard Terence O'Grady, 1987 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Zoology The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date: March 24, 1987 i i Abstract Historical structuralism is presented as a research program in evolutionary biology. It uses patterns of common ancestry as initial hypotheses in explaining evolutionary history. Such patterns, represented by phylogenetic trees, or cladograms, are postulates of persistent ancestral traits. These traits are evidence of historical constraints on evolutionary change. Patterns and processes consistent with a cladogram are considered to be consistent with an initial hypothesis of historical constraint. As an application of historical structuralism, a phylogenetic analysis is presented for members of the digenean plagiorchioid genera Glypthelmins Stafford, 1905 and Haplometrana Lucker, 1931.
    [Show full text]
  • Somatic Musculature in Trematode Hermaphroditic Generation Darya Y
    Krupenko and Dobrovolskij BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:189 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0468-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Somatic musculature in trematode hermaphroditic generation Darya Y. Krupenko1* and Andrej A. Dobrovolskij1,2 Abstract Background: The somatic musculature in trematode hermaphroditic generation (cercariae, metacercariae and adult) is presumed to comprise uniform layers of circular, longitudinal and diagonal muscle fibers of the body wall, and internal dorsoventral muscle fibers. Meanwhile, specific data are few, and there has been no analysis taking the trunk axial differentiation and regionalization into account. Yet presence of the ventral sucker (= acetabulum) morphologically divides the digenean trunk into two regions: preacetabular and postacetabular. The functional differentiation of these two regions is already evident in the nervous system organization, and the goal of our research was to investigate the somatic musculature from the same point of view. Results: Somatic musculature of ten trematode species was studied with use of fluorescent-labelled phalloidin and confocal microscopy. The body wall of examined species included three main muscle layers (of circular, longitudinal and diagonal fibers), and most of the species had them distinctly better developed in the preacetabuler region. In majority of the species several (up to seven) additional groups of muscle fibers were found within the body wall. Among them the anterioradial, posterioradial, anteriolateral muscle fibers, and U-shaped muscle sets were most abundant. These groups were located on the ventral surface, and associated with the ventral sucker. The additional internal musculature was quite diverse as well, and included up to twelve separate groups of muscle fibers or bundles in one species.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitology Volume 60 60
    Advances in Parasitology Volume 60 60 Cover illustration: Echinobothrium elegans from the blue-spotted ribbontail ray (Taeniura lymma) in Australia, a 'classical' hypothesis of tapeworm evolution proposed 2005 by Prof. Emeritus L. Euzet in 1959, and the molecular sequence data that now represent the basis of contemporary phylogenetic investigation. The emergence of molecular systematics at the end of the twentieth century provided a new class of data with which to revisit hypotheses based on interpretations of morphology and life ADVANCES IN history. The result has been a mixture of corroboration, upheaval and considerable insight into the correspondence between genetic divergence and taxonomic circumscription. PARASITOLOGY ADVANCES IN ADVANCES Complete list of Contents: Sulfur-Containing Amino Acid Metabolism in Parasitic Protozoa T. Nozaki, V. Ali and M. Tokoro The Use and Implications of Ribosomal DNA Sequencing for the Discrimination of Digenean Species M. J. Nolan and T. H. Cribb Advances and Trends in the Molecular Systematics of the Parasitic Platyhelminthes P P. D. Olson and V. V. Tkach ARASITOLOGY Wolbachia Bacterial Endosymbionts of Filarial Nematodes M. J. Taylor, C. Bandi and A. Hoerauf The Biology of Avian Eimeria with an Emphasis on Their Control by Vaccination M. W. Shirley, A. L. Smith and F. M. Tomley 60 Edited by elsevier.com J.R. BAKER R. MULLER D. ROLLINSON Advances and Trends in the Molecular Systematics of the Parasitic Platyhelminthes Peter D. Olson1 and Vasyl V. Tkach2 1Division of Parasitology, Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 2Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58202-9019, USA Abstract ...................................166 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspidogaster Limacoides DIESING, 1835 (Trematoda, Aspidogastridae): a New Parasite of Barbus Barbus (L.) (Pisces, Cyprinidae) in Austria
    ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 106 B 141-144 Wien, Juli 2005 Aspidogaster limacoides DIESING, 1835 (Trematoda, Aspidogastridae): A new parasite of Barbus barbus (L.) (Pisces, Cyprinidae) in Austria Schludermann C.*, Laimgruber S., Konecny R., Schabuss M. Abstract Adults of the trematode parasite Aspidogaster limacoides DiEsrNG, 1835 were found in the cyprinid Bar- bus barbus (L.) during a parasitological investigation of endohelminths in the years 2001 and 2002 in the Danube downstream of Vienna, Austria. This is the first record of A. limacoides in barbel from the Austrian part of the Danube system. Zusammenfassung Adulte Formen des Trematoden Aspidogaster limacoides DiEsrNG, 1835 wurden in einer Population der Barbe Barbus barbus (L.) in der Donau flussab von Wien gefunden. Die Erfassung erfolgte im Rahmen einer fischparasitologischen Aufnahme in den Jahren 2001 und 2002. Es ist der erste gesicherte Fund von A. limacoides in der Barbe im österreichischen Teil der Donau. Keywords: Aspidogaster limacoides, Barbus barbus, Trematoda, Austria, Danube Introduction The subclass of Aspidogastrea (FAUST & TANG, 1936) consists of a small group of trematodes with a worldwide distribution comprising about 80 species and has not been described for Austria yet. The Aspidogastrea parasitise poikilothermous animals like crustaceans, molluscs, fish, and reptiles in marine and freshwater environments. In contrast to their sister group, the digenean trematodes, they present simple life cycles with no multiplicative larval stages. Aspidogaster limacoides DiEsrNG, 1835 was found in molluscs and fish from river basins in the Ponto-Caspian region (e.g. BYKHOVSKAYA- PAVLOWSKAYA & al, 1962, EVLANOV 1990, NAGIBINA & TIMOVEEVA 1971). The hosts involved consist of mollusc and a definitive or facultative vertebrate host, nevertheless most aspidogastrids require only a single host to complete their life cycle (RHODE 1972).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Marine Mammal Parasites in New Zealand and Australian Waters Cambridge.Org/Jhl
    Journal of Helminthology Checklist of marine mammal parasites in New Zealand and Australian waters cambridge.org/jhl K. Lehnert1, R. Poulin2 and B. Presswell2 1Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Review Article Bünteweg 2, 30559 Hannover, Germany and 2Department of Zoology, University of Otago, 340 Great King Street, Cite this article: Lehnert K, Poulin R, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand Presswell B (2019). Checklist of marine mammal parasites in New Zealand and Abstract Australian waters. Journal of Helminthology 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/ Marine mammals are long-lived top predators with vagile lifestyles, which often inhabit S0022149X19000361 remote environments. This is especially relevant in the oceanic waters around New Zealand and Australia where cetaceans and pinnipeds are considered as vulnerable and often endan- Received: 31 January 2019 gered due to anthropogenic impacts on their habitat. Parasitism is ubiquitous in wildlife, and Accepted: 25 March 2019 prevalence of parasitic infections as well as emerging diseases can be valuable bioindicators of Key words: the ecology and health of marine mammals. Collecting information about parasite diversity in Metazoa; protozoa; cetaceans; pinnipeds; marine mammals will provide a crucial baseline for assessing their impact on host and eco- arthropods; ecology; bioindicators; system ecology. New studies on marine mammals in New Zealand and Australian waters have conservation recently added to our knowledge of parasite prevalence, life cycles and taxonomic relation- Author for correspondence: ships in the Australasian region, and justify a first host–parasite checklist encompassing all K. Lehnert, E-mail: kristina.lehnert@tiho- available data.
    [Show full text]