Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent, non-partisan body on the seam of academia and politics. The Institute plans policy and devises reforms for government and public administration agencies, and for the institutions of democracy. In its plans and endeavors, the Institute strives to support the institutions of Israel’s developing democracy and consolidate its values. The Institute’s research work is followed up by practical recommendations, seeking to improve governance in Israel and foster a long-term vision for a stable democratic regime adapted to the structure, the values, and the norms of Israeli society. The Institute aspires to further public discourse in Israel on the issues placed on the national agenda, to promote structural, political, and economic reforms, to serve as a consulting body to decision-makers and the broad public, to provide information and present comparative research. Researchers at the Israel Democracy Institute are leading academics directing projects in various areas of society and governance in Israel. The Institute’s publications department produces, markets, and distributes the results of their work in several series of books (“The Democracy Library”), policy studies, the Caesarea Forum, periodicals, and conferences proceedings. The Guttman Center was established in its present form in 1998, when the Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research became part of the Israel Democracy Institute. Professor Louis Guttman founded the original Institute in 1949 as a pioneering center for the study of public opinion and the advancement of social science methodology. The goal of the Guttman Center is to enrich public discourse on issues of public policy through the information retrieved from the Center’s databases and through public opinion surveys conducted by the Center. Auditing Israeli Democracy 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar Translator: Batya Stein Language Editors (Hebrew): Izhak Tishler, Anat Bernstein Series and Cover Design: Ron Haran Layout: Art Plus, Jerusalem Printed in Jerusalem by Art Plus ISBN 965-519-35-8 No portion of this book may be reproduced, copied, photographed, recorded, translated, stored in a data base, broadcasted, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, optic, mechanical, or otherwise. Commercial use in any form of the material contained in this book without express written permission from the publisher is strictly forbidden. © The Israel Democracy Institute. Printed in Israel 2007 Asher Arian is a Senior Fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute and a professor of political science at the University of Haifa, and at the City University of New York. Nir Atmor and Yael Hadar are research assistants at the Israel Democracy Institute. The Israel Democracy Institute’s Books and Policy Papers may be ordered from: Tel: 02-5300800, 1-800-20-2222; Fax: 03-5488640 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.idi.org.il The Israel Democracy Institute, P.O. Box 4482, Jerusalem, 91044 All Indices of Democracy are now online and available for free download at www.idi.org.il Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables 7 Acknowledgements 9 Summary 11 Part One: The Democracy Index 2007 A. Description of the Research and its Goals 15 B. The Democracy Indicators 19 1. A Summary Outline 19 2. Israel 2007 as Reflected in the Indicators 19 3. Selected Findings 24 C. The Democracy Survey 35 1. A Summary Outline 35 2. Public Perception of Democracy’s Implementation in Israel 2007 35 3. Democratic Attitudes in the Israeli Public in 2007 37 4. Selected Findings 39 5. Democracy: Support and Satisfaction 46 Part Two: Cohesion in a Divided Society A. Background: Cohesion in Israel 53 B. Social Trust in Israel 57 C. Relationships between Groups in Israel 2007 61 1. The Jewish-Arab split 61 2. The Social-Economic split 68 3. The Religious-Secular split 73 4. The New Immigrants-Old-Timers split 77 5. The Ethnic split 79 D. Social Cohesion in Israel 83 1. Perceptions of Readiness for Compromise 83 2. Self-Identity and Self-Definition 87 3. Contribution to Society: The IDF and Defense 90 4. Sense of Being Part of the Country 93 Epilogue 99 Appendices 1. Summary of the Democracy Indices 2003-2007 101 2. The Democracy Index February 2007 Compared to the Democracy 101 Indices 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 104 3. Distributions in the Democracy Survey, February 2007 111 4. Calendar of Events, January 2006 – May 2007 119 7 List of Figures and Tables Figure 1 The Structure of the Index 15 Figure 2 Israel’s Ranking in the Democracies’ Sample according to 23 Criteria 20 Figure 3 Political Corruption: An International Comparison 26 Figure 4 Integrity in Two Measures of Political Corruption, 1996-2006 27 Figure 5 Voice and Accountability: An International Comparison 28 Figure 6 Voice and Accountability, 1996-2005 28 Figure 7 Economic Freedom: An International Comparison 30 Figure 8 Economic Freedom, 1995-2007 31 Figure 9 Law and Order: An International Comparison 32 Figure 10 Rule of Law: An International Comparison 32 Figure 11 Rule of Law, 1996-2005 33 Figure 12 Political Stability: An International Comparison 34 Figure 13 Political Stability, 1996-2005 34 Figure 14 Perception of Democracy’s Implementation: Israeli Public 2003 and 2007 38 Figure 15 Democratic Attitudes: Israeli Public 2003 and 2007 40 Figure 16 Assessing Democracy’s Implementation in the Institutional Aspect 41 within Groups in the Israeli Public: Jewish Old-Timers, Immigrants from the CIS, and Arabs 42 Figure 17 Accountability, 1969-2007 Figure 18 Sense of Political Influence, 1973-2007 43 Figure 19 Sense of Political Influence: An International Comparison 43 Figure 20 Trust in Key Institutions, 2003-2007 44 Figure 21 Trust in Key Institutions, 2003-2007 45 Figure 22 Protecting Democracy, 2003-2007 46 Figure 23 Support for Strong Leaders, 1969-2007 47 Figure 24 Personal Feeling Considering the Current Situation, 1973-2007 49 Figure 25 Satisfaction with the Situation of Israel, 1997-2007 50 Figure 26 Satisfaction with Israeli Democracy, 1987-2007 50 Figure 27 Personal Social Trust, 1980-2007 58 Figure 28 Personal Social Trust: An International Comparison 59 Figure 29 Social Trust, 1981-2007 59 Figure 30 Social Trust: Groups in Israeli Society 60 Figure 31 Relationships between Groups, 2007 62 Figure 32 Arab-Jews Relationship Pattern according to Nationality, 2000-2007 64 8 Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Figure 33 Political Equality for the Arab Minority, 1993-2007 65 Figure 34 Equal Rights for the Arab Minority, 1985-2007 67 Figure 35 Opposition to the Encouragement of Arab Emigration, 1987-2007 68 Figure 36 Inequality – GINI Coefficient: An International Comparison 70 Figure 37 Inequality – Rich-Poor Relationships: An International Comparison 71 Figure 38 Rich-Poor Relationships, 2003-2007 72 Figure 39 Capitalist vs. Socialist Economy, 1962-2007 73 Figure 40 Observance of Jewish Tradition, 1981-2007 75 Figure 41 Living according to Jewish Religious Tradition, 1981-2007 75 Figure 42 Relationships between Religious and Non-Religious Jews, 1972-2007 76 Figure 43 Relationship between New Immigrants and Old-Timers, 1975-2007 79 Figure 44 Relationship between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim, 1972-2007 81 Figure 45 Relationship between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim according to Country of Origin 81 Figure 46 Readiness to Compromise 84 Figure 47 Readiness to Compromise According to Self-Definition and Nationality 85 Figure 48 Readiness to Compromise According to Self-Definition on the Right-Left Continuum 85 Figure 49 Readiness to Compromise according to the Level of Religious Observance 86 Figure 50 Identity: Self-Definition 87 Figure 51 Identity: Self-Definition according to Self-Ascription of Religious Orientation (first choice only) 88 Figure 52 Identity: Self-Definition according to Self-Ascription of Religious Orientation (second choice only) 89 Figure 53 Identity: Self-Definition – Israeli Arabs 89 Figure 54 Army Service: An International Comparison 91 Figure 55 Characteristics of Youths: An Evaluation 92 Figure 56 Proud to be Israeli, 2003-2007 93 Figure 57 Proud to be Israeli according to Self-Definition of Religiosity 94 Figure 58 Connection to Israel, 1981-2007 95 Figure 59 Connection to the Jewish People, 1991-2007 96 Figure 60 Remaining in Israel, 1986-2007 97 Figure 61 Reasons for Doubting Life in Israel, 1986-2007 98 Table 1 Israel 2007 As Reflected in the Indicators: Changes since the 2006 Index 23 9 Acknowledgements Thanks to Dr. Yagil Levy for his perceptive and valuable advice, and to Michael Philippov for his efforts and his contribution to the study. To Dr. Raphael Ventura, to Eli Sapir, and to Ayala Hendin for their assistance in data collection. To Carmit Gai for her assistance in editing this publication. To the Institute’s publication staff for their meticulous and devoted work in the preparation of this book. The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index is dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a beloved friend who went to war, and did not come back. Zur fell in the Second Lebanon War on August 13, 2006. He was 27 years old. 11 Summary Social cohesion has always been a themselves as an inseparable part of the prominent characteristic of Israeli society. In State of Israel and its problems and are ready ordinary times, and particularly in times of to fight for the country should the need arise. trouble, values of mutuality, solidarity, and Most respondents are interested in politics cohesiveness have stood out. In recent years, and talk with their friends and family about however, and particularly in the months that political issues. Beside their pride about the followed the Second Lebanon War, feelings country and their concern with it, most of of weariness, affront, and disgust with them are in a good or very good mood, and political processes in general and with the think they will be able to adapt to the current political system in particular have become situation.
Recommended publications
  • Jabotinsky Institute in Israel Peres, Netanyahu and Edelstein Praise
    Jabotinsky Institute in Israel Published by the Hon. Chairman Jabotinsky Institute in Israel Mr. Yitzhak Shamir Z"L Founder and first director: Former Prime Minister of Israel ז"ל Joseph Pa'amoni Volume 52 Octobre 2013 ראש הממשלה בנימין נתניהו מעיין בכרך "לאומיות ליברלית" מאת Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu looks through volume ז'בוטינסקי, שהגישו לו )משמאל( ד"ר קרני רובין־ז'בוטינסקי, יוסי Liberal Nationalism, given to him by members of Institute אחימאיר, מרדכי שריג וכן עמירם בוקשפן. .Executive Board Peres, Netanyahu and Edelstein Praise New Volume of the Works of Jabotinsky - Liberal Nationalism “Your renewed publication of the Works of Jabotinsky, edited the new book, that he has had the honor of reading a number by Prof. Arye Naor and translated by Peter Kriksunov and of Jabotinsky’s works in their original language—Russian. He Hamutal Bar-Yosef, marks an important theoretical stratum lauded the Jabotinsky Institute for this project and stated that there in the research of Jabotinsky’s doctrine,” wrote President was a great need to aid the Institute to continue this praiseworthy Shimon Peres in a thank-you letter to the director general endeavor. of the Jabotinsky Institute in Israel for the book Liberal Liberal Nationalism, the first volume in the new series of Nationalism by Ze’ev Jabotinsky. Jabotinsky’s ideological works, is edited by Professor Arye Naor. Currently the book is being produced by the Jabotinsky Institute Peres added, “The reader of Jabotinsky’s writings cannot help but be in an annotated edition featuring new translations to Hebrew from moved by the liberalism so inherent in his doctrine, by Jabotinsky’s such languages as Russian, Yiddish and English.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden
    Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden Two other parties that may be possible coalition partners: · United Torah Judaism – Essentially, it is only concerned with internal issues. Its real demand is maintaining social services and allowances for their constituents. Other issues: Maintaining the powers of the Orthodox Rabbinical Courts over civil issues such as marriage, divorce, burial, etc. are among their top priorities, along with maintaining the Sabbath laws preventing work on the “Holy Day”, laws keeping ultra-Orthodox youth out of army service, etc. Although their constituency is sympathetic to the settlers and the Right, the leadership stresses that they are willing to support any coalition that accedes to their demands. As Olmert does not need them to guarantee the stability of the coalition, he won’t be “courting” them. Some of the issues that may affect their position in coalition negotiations are their rivalry with Shas and their often-confrontational relations with Meretz and groups within the Labor party over freedom of religion. · Meretz – The party that is the Israeli equivalent of the “Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”, Meretz and its predecessors have been at the forefront of not only the contacts that led to direct negotiations between Israel and the PLO (and the ensuing Oslo Accords), but from the earliest days after the creation of the State of Israel also have led the struggle for equal rights for Israel’s Arab citizens, labor & union rights, women’s rights, freedom of the press and freedom of religion issues, gay rights, etc. It endorses negotiated withdrawal from almost all of the West Bank, including parts of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Palestinians Can Burst Israel's Political Bubble
    Al-Shabaka Policy Brief Policy Al-Shabaka March 2018 WHEN LEFT IS RIGHT: HOW PALESTINIANS CAN BURST ISRAEL’S POLITICAL BUBBLE By Amjad Iraqi Overview the allies holding up his fragile rule, from the ultra- orthodox Jewish parties to his personal rivals within Although no indictments have been issued yet, Israelis Likud. “King Bibi,” however, survived them all. A are speculating whether the latest developments in skilled politician, he has been adept at managing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption Israel’s notoriously volatile coalition system, and [email protected] scandals finally mark the beginning of his political has remained in power with three consecutive demise. The second-longest serving prime minister governments over nine years – each more right wing after David Ben-Gurion, Netanyahu has had a than the last.2 profound impact on Israel’s political scene since the 1990s. It is therefore troubling, especially to Netanyahu directly influenced the country’s media Palestinians, that if these corruption cases are the landscape by shaping the editorial stance of Israel harbinger of Netanyahu’s downfall, they will have Hayom (the nation’s gratis, most-read newspaper, had nothing to do with the more egregious crimes for funded by American billionaire Sheldon Adelson), which he is responsible, and for which he – and future and used the Communications Ministry to threaten Israeli leaders – have yet to be held accountable. and harass media outlets that were critical of him. Despite crises and condemnations throughout This policy brief analyzes Israel’s political his career – including mass Israeli protests for transformations under Netanyahu and maps out the socioeconomic justice in 2011 and, more recently, current leadership contenders from a Palestinian weekly protests against widespread government perspective.1 It argues that Israel’s insular political corruption – Netanyahu withstood public pressures discourse, and the increasing alignment of Israeli to step down.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    Research. Debate. Impact. 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Table of Contents Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board 4 Sixth Meeting of IDI's International Advisory Council 8 The Center for Democratic Values and Institutions 11 The Center for Religion, Nation and State 23 The Center for Governance and the Economy 29 The Center for Security and Democracy 35 The Guttman Center for Surveys and Public Policy Research 41 IDI in the Media 47 Our Team 50 Our Leaders 51 Our Partners 52 Financials 53 Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board Dear Friends, 2016 was a year of change and upheaval throughout the jobs available to Haredim. The government adopted most of democratic world. Set against the tumult of Brexit and the the recommendations and is now in the process of allocating US elections, Israel seemed at times like an island of stability. a half-billion-shekel budget in line with these proposals. This However, under the surface, Israeli society is changing, and IDI success story illustrates the potential of turning relatively small took on a leading role in identifying those changes and working philanthropic investments into large-scale transformational with policymakers to address them. change by affecting policy and legislation on the basis of outstanding applied research. As the report that follows lays out, 2016 was a year rich in activity and achievements. In this letter, we have chosen to single Several new scholars joined our team in 2016. Ms. Daphna out the impact one program had on government policy in the Aviram-Nitzan, former director of research for the Israel employment area.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, July 3
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Wednesday, May 27 Headlines: After Rocket Attack, Israeli Jets Strike Targets in Gaza Strip Ya'alon: Gaza Will Pay a Heavy Price if Calm is Not Maintained Palestinians Reject Proposal to Discuss Settlement Borders US Says Reported 'Settlement Borders' Proposal New to its Ears Netanyahu Embarks on Senior Civil Service 'Beheadings' Kahlon: I Will Not Take Part in Gas-Related Decisions A New Headache: Begin Refuses to Resign Amnesty Report: Hamas has Committed War Crimes in Gaza Commentary: Yedioth Haronoth: “The Jerusalem Paradox” By Haim Ramon Foreign Policy: “Benjamin Netanyahu’s Grade A Pork-Barrel Politics” By Neri Zilber S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor News Excerpts May 27, 2015 Times of Israel After Rocket Attack, Israeli Jets Strike Targets in Gaza Strip The Israeli Air Force launched airstrikes on the Gaza Strip early Wednesday morning, hours after a projectile fired from the coastal enclave fell in southern Israel, causing no damage. There were no immediate reports of casualties in the bombardments across the Palestinian coastal enclave. The IDF said in a statement that it targeted four sites of terror infrastructure in the southern Gaza Strip in response to the rocket fire at southern Israel on Tuesday evening. The military said it confirmed direct hits. “The reality that Hamas’s territory is used as a staging ground to attack Israel is unacceptable and intolerable
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States
    Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law LARC @ Cardozo Law Articles Faculty 2010 Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States Malvina Halberstam Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Malvina Halberstam, Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States, 31 Cardozo Law Review 2393 (2010). Available at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/68 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty at LARC @ Cardozo Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of LARC @ Cardozo Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. JUDICIAL REVIEW, A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: ISRAEL, CANADA, AND THE UNITED STATES INTRODUCTION Malvina Halberstam∗ On April 26, 2009, the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law hosted a roundtable discussion, Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States, with prominent jurists, statesmen, academics, and practicing attorneys.∗∗ The panel was comprised of Justice Morris Fish of the Canadian Supreme Court; Justice Elyakim Rubinstein of the Israeli Supreme Court; Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Hon. Irwin Cotler, a member of the Canadian Parliament and formerly Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada; Hon. Michael Eitan, a Minister in the government of Israel, a member of the Knesset (Israeli Parliament), and former chair of the Committee on the Constitution, Law and Justice; Professor Daniel Friedmann, formerly Minister of Justice of Israel, who proposed legislation to remedy what some view as serious problems with judicial review in Israel; Nathan Lewin, one of the most eminent attorneys in the United States, who has argued many cases before the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Israeli Democracy Index Is Dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a Beloved Friend Who Went to War and Did Not Come Back
    Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent, non-partisan body on the seam of academia and politics. The Institute proposes policy recommendations and reforms for government and public administration agencies. In its plans and endeavors, the Institute strives to support the institutions of Israel’s developing democracy and consolidate its values. The Institute’s research is followed up by practical recommendations, seeking to improve governance in Israel and foster a long-term vision for a stable democratic regime adapted to the structure, the values, and the norms of Israeli society. The Institute aspires to further public discourse in Israel on the issues placed on the national agenda, to promote structural, political, and economic reforms, to serve as a consulting body to decision-makers and the broad public, to provide information, and present comparative research. Researchers at the Israel Democracy Institute are leading academics directing projects in various areas of society and governance in Israel. The IDI Press produces, markets, and distributes the results of their work in several series of books (“The Democracy Library”), policy papers, the Caesarea Forum Series, periodicals, and conference proceedings. The Guttman Center was established in its present form in 1998, when the Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research became part of the Israel Democracy Institute. Professor Louis Guttman founded the original Institute in 1949 as a pioneering center for the study of public opinion and the advancement of social science methodology. The goal of the Guttman Center is to enrich public discourse on issues of public policy through the information retrieved from the Center’s databases and through public opinion surveys conducted by the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Dalia Liran-Alper – Curriculum Vitae
    The College of Management-Academic Studies April 2008 Date: September 16, 2014 Dr. Dalia Liran-Alper – Curriculum Vitae Personal Details: Academic Degree: PhD Phone Number at: Mobile: 0546-665480 School/Department: School of Media Studies, The College of Management-Academic Studies Academic Education: Name of higher education Year degree Year/s institution Subject Degree or diploma received 1976-1979 Hebrew University of International Relations, BA 1980 Jerusalem History 1980-1983 Hebrew University of Communication MA (practical 1983 Jerusalem program) 1989-1994 Hebrew University of Communication Thesis (theory 1994 Jerusalem program) 1998-2005 University of Haifa Education, Communication PhD 2005 M.A. and Ph.D. Details: (Institution, Adviser/s, Title) Masters thesis: Media representation of women in politics: Are they still “Domineering dowagers and scheming concubines”? (1994) Adviser: Prof. Gadi Wolfsfeld Doctoral thesis: Sociocultural construction of gendered identity among girls attending dance classes in Israel (2004) Adviser: Tamar Katriel Further Studies: Teaching license program, Levinsky College of Education, Tel Aviv (1995-1996) Academic Experience – Teaching: Year/s Name of institution Department/program Rank/position 1980-1992 The Open University International relations, Social patterns Instructor in Israel, Mass media, and others 1993-1997 Levinsky College of Faculty of Education, Teacher Lecturer Education Training 2011-1989 Beit Berl Academic School of Education, Department of Lecturer College Social Sciences 1994-2004
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Solomon Solon 1270287
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ International criminal courts and the introduction of the Daubert standard as a mode of assessing the psychological impact of warfare on civilians a comparative perspective Solomon, Solon Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS AND THE INTRODUCTION OF THE DAUBERT STANDARD AS A MODE OF ASSESSING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF WARFARE ON CIVILIANS A Comparative Perspective Solon Solomon A thesis submitted to King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: The Question of the Daubert Standard Application in International Criminal Law as a Mode for Assessing Warfare’s Psychological Toll on Civilians ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • IAF Attacks Mortar Cell Near Gaza Security Fence | Jerusalem Post Page 1 of 3
    IAF attacks mortar cell near Gaza security fence | Jerusalem Post Page 1 of 3 IAF attacks mortar cell near Gaza security fence EHUD ZION WALDOKS and jpost.com staff , THE JERUSALEM POST Oct. 8, 2007 IAF aircraft attacked overnight Sunday a Palestinian terror cell whose members were firing mortar shells over the Gaza security fence into the western Negev. All six mortars landed in open territory, and no wounded or damage were reported. According to Palestinian sources, seven unarmed Palestinians were wounded in the strike. Elsewhere, an IDF officer was lightly wounded by gunfire during an arrest operation in the Balata refugee camp near Nablus. He was evacuated to a hospital for treatment. A total of 10 Palestinian terror suspects were arrested throughout the West Bank overnight Sunday. The strike came after a long-range Grad-type Katyusha rocket landed near Netivot in the Negev Sunday morning, about 11 kilometers from the Gaza Strip. It was the first time a rocket landed near the city since Palestinians started firing from Gaza in 2001. "Israel is concerned and worried over the fact that the range of the missiles being fired on the western Negev settlements has increased and views these developments severely," OC Military Intelligence Maj.-Gen. Amos Yadlin said at Sunday's weekly cabinet meeting. The Popular Resistance Committees claimed responsibility for the attack. The IDF remained tight-lipped Sunday night about whether it would respond to the incident. While the rocket landed in an open field and caused little damage, it is very unusual to see the longer-range Grad deployed in the South.
    [Show full text]