DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation 3.8 Transportation 3.8 Transportation This section presents a description of base transportation and circulation conditions for key intersections, roadways, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities in the area of the Proposed Action and alternatives. This evaluation was prepared by Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation, Inc. (W-Trans) and reviewed by an ESA traffic engineer. 3.8.1 Circulation Network Major Roadways The local circulation system serving the project site is shown in Figure 3.8-1. Primary access to the project site would be provided via Asti Road, which connects with U.S. Highway 101 (U.S. 101) via the Citrus Fair Drive interchange to the north and the South Cloverdale interchange to the south. Below is a summery of the major roadways that serve the project site: • U.S. 101 is the primary route connecting Sonoma County to the San Francisco Bay Area to the south and Mendocino and Humboldt Counties to the north. Within Cloverdale, U.S 101 is a four-lane freeway with interchanges at South Cloverdale, Citrus Fair Drive, and State Route (SR) 128 to the north. • Cloverdale Boulevard is a north-south primary arterial running through Cloverdale that connects to SR 128 at the northern limits of Cloverdale. The corridor is primarily a three-lane road through the City. • Asti Road runs parallel to U.S. 101 and connects to Cloverdale Boulevard via both Citrus Fair Drive and the South Cloverdale Interchanges. Between the Citrus Fair Drive and Cloverdale Boulevard Interchanges, this roadway has two lanes and would be the main access road to the project site. Intersections In order to evaluate potential impacts to the circulation network, 13 study intersections were selected, which are listed below and shown in Figure 3.8-1. Each of the intersections are side street stop- controlled, except as indicated below. Figure 3.8-2 displays the existing lane configurations at each of the study intersections. 1. Cloverdale Boulevard / First Street (signalized) 2. Cloverdale Boulevard / Lake Street 3. Cloverdale Boulevard / Citrus Fair Drive (signalized) 4. U.S. 101 Southbound Ramps / Citrus Fair Drive 5. U.S. 101 Northbound Ramps / Citrus Fair Drive 6. Asti Road / Citrus Fair Drive 7. Asti Drive / Project Driveway (proposed access) 8. Asti Road / Santana Drive 9. Cloverdale Boulevard / Treadway Drive 10. Cloverdale Boulevard / South Interchange Connection 11. U.S. 101 Southbound Ramps / South Interchange Connection 12. U.S. 101 Northbound Ramps / South Interchange Connection 13. Asti Road / South Interchange Connection Cloverdale Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Resort Casino Project 3.8-1 ESA / 207737 Draft EIS August 2010 1 et N tre et S re ke St LLakea Street NOT TO SCALE st FFirstir Street 2 rus Fa CCitrusit 3 i r D r iv e 4 5 6 101 CCloverdale Boulevard l o 7 v e r d a e l AAsti Road iv e s r B t D i a o R n u ta l o e n v a a a d SSantana Drive r d 8 9 SSouthouth IInterchangenterchange CConnectiononnection 13 12 11 10 1 Study Intersections Project Site Cloverdale Rancheria Resort Casino Project EIS . 207737 SOURCE: w-trans, 2009; and ESA, 2009 Figure 3.8-1 Study Intersections Cloverdale Blvd US 101 SB Ramps 1 et 3 4 N tre et S re ke St LLakea Street NOT TO SCALE st FFirstir Street 2 Citrus Fair Dr Citrus Fair Dr Cloverdale Blvd 1 rus Fa CCitrusit 3 i r D r iv e 4 First St 5 5 US 101 NB Ramps 6 Asti Rd 6 Citrus Fair Dr Citrus Fair Dr 2 Cloverdale Blvd 101 7 Asti Rd Lake St Driveway 8 Asti Rd Cloverdale Blvd CCloverdale Boulevard 9 l o 7 v e r d a e l AAsti Road iv e s r B t D i a Treadway Dr o R n u ta l o e n Santana Dr v a a a d SSantana Drive r d 8 9 Asti Rd SSouthouth IInterchangenterchange CConnectiononnection 13 13 12 11 10 S. Interchange Connection 10 Cloverdale Blvd 11 US 101 SB Ramps 12 US 101 NB Ramps S. Interchange Connection S. Interchange S. Interchange 1 Study Intersections Connection Connection Project Site Cloverdale Rancheria Resort Casino Project EIS . 207737 SOURCE: w-trans, 2009; and ESA, 2009 Figure 3.8-2 Lane Configurations 3.8 Transportation Study Periods Major activity periods for the Proposed Action and Alternatives B through D would be the evening and weekends; traffic capacity and intersection levels of service were evaluated for the critical p.m. peak period and weekend midday peak hour. Major activity periods for Alternative E would be the morning and evening, but could vary depending on the types of business that would be developed. The p.m. peak hour occurs between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., and typically reflects the worst congestion conditions during the homebound commute. Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Facilities Pedestrian Facilities There are areas around the City of Cloverdale with sidewalks and marked crosswalks that serve pedestrian travel. The primary areas of pedestrian activity that have facilities to accommodate pedestrians are typically within the downtown area. Another area where pedestrian facilities are found is the Citrus Fair Drive underpass and U.S. 101 ramps. Roadways such as Asti Road and the South Interchange Connection between Cloverdale Boulevard and Asti Road do not have pedestrian facilities. The general vicinity of the project site currently does not have sidewalks; pedestrians generally walk on the shoulder along Asti Road. Bicycle Routes The adopted Cloverdale Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan details existing and proposed Class I Bike Paths, Class II Bike Lanes, and Class III Bike Routes in Cloverdale (Sonoma County Transportation Authority, 2008). Currently, the only Class I Bike Paths in Cloverdale are located in Cloverdale River Park, to the north of the project site. There is a proposed Class I facility in the rail right-of-way as part of the SMART rail project. The 2008 Cloverdale Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan shows two proposed north-south Class I pathway projects in the vicinity of the project, including the SMART path (described below), which would bisect the project property, and an extension of the Cloverdale River Trail, which would follow the eastern edge of the project site along the Russian River. Class II Bike Lanes are provided on Asti Road (from First Street / Crocker Road to about one mile south of the project site), primarily serving recreational riders, consisting of wide shoulders marked with edge lines and bike lane signs and markings. Class II lanes also are provided along the Citrus Fair Drive undercrossing of U.S. 101 to the north of the project site, and along the Cloverdale Boulevard / South Redwood Highway overcrossing of U.S. 101 to the south of the project site. These east-west connections combined with north-south bike lanes on Asti Road provide access between the project site and destinations in Cloverdale on the west side of the highway. Additional bicycle lanes have been suggested for the full length of Cloverdale Boulevard (except downtown). There are no existing (or proposed) Class III Bike Routes in the project area. Cloverdale Rancheria Fee-to-Trust and Resort Casino Project 3.8-4 ESA / 207737 Draft EIS August 2010 3.8 Transportation Public Transit Sonoma County Transit Sonoma County Transit (SCT) is the principal transit service within the City of Cloverdale, providing daily local and intercity service (sctransit.com, 2009). SCT Route 60 (Cloverdale-Healdsburg- Santa Rosa) provides intercity service seven days per week between Cloverdale City Hall and the Santa Rosa Transit Mall with stops in Asti, Geyserville, Healdsburg, Windsor Larkfield and Santa Rosa. Route 60 stops at the Cloverdale Transit Depot on Asti Road (just north of the project site) twice daily during the morning and evening commute periods, and includes stops in downtown Cloverdale, along Cloverdale Boulevard, and south of the project on Asti Road with varying headways (between 30 and 120 minutes) throughout the day. SCT Route 68 (Cloverdale Local) provides local weekday service to destinations throughout Cloverdale with transfer points to regional SCT service and inter-regional Greyhound bus service. Route 68 operates with approximately one-hour headways with afternoon stops at the Cloverdale Transit Depot near the project site. All Sonoma County Transit buses are wheelchair lift-equipped and can transport two wheelchair passengers at a time. Sonoma County Transit allows bikes on all of its buses, with a front-loading bike rack that can accommodate up to three bicycles. When the front-loading rack is full, bus drivers may allow up to two bikes inside the bus. Transit shelters are provided at various bus stops throughout Cloverdale. Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) The SMART Rail Train Depot is located approximately 1.5 miles north of the project site along Asti Road. There is currently no train service. The SMART District was established in 2003 by the California Legislature to oversee the development and implementation of passenger rail service in Sonoma and Marin counties along the Northwestern Pacific Railway. The SMART passenger train would serve passengers at 14 existing or planned multi-modal train stations between Cloverdale in Sonoma County and Larkspur in Marin County, where a connection can be made to San Francisco via existing ferry service. The passage of Measure Q in November 2008, which will provide funding to connect Marin and Sonoma County via train, will eventually make this an active station with connections to the south. SMART also proposes to provide a north-south transportation route for bicyclists and pedestrians, with approximately 70 miles of multi-use pathway located along or adjacent to the right-of-way between Cloverdale and Larkspur.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senior Resource Guide
    Eldercare Locator, (800) 677-1116 Senior Resource Guide � Sonoma County Area Agency on Aging Sonoma County The Sonoma County Area Agency on Aging (AAA) is a program Board of Supervisors of the Sonoma County Human Services Department. The AAA Susan Gorin, 1st District and its Advisory Council plan, coordinate and allocate funding David Rabbitt, 2nd District for persons sixty years of age and older in Sonoma County. The Shirlee Zane, 3rd District AAA Advisory Council advises the Board of Supervisors on the James Gore, 4th District needs of seniors, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers, Efren Carrillo, 5th District and advocates on their behalf. 707-565-5950 Advisory Council 3725 Westwind Boulevard, Suite 101 Members Santa Rosa, California 95403 Jen Arent The 2016 edition of the Sonoma County Senior Resource Guide Lea Black is a directory of services, agencies, and programs which assists Colleen Campbell older persons, in their daily lives. The services are listed in Robert Cortez alphabetical order by category of service with specific agencies Judith Eisen listed under the appropriate category. Dorothy Fried Brian Gilespie The Area Agency on Aging (AAA) has made every effort to Colleen Hale compile a useful senior resource guide for the residents of Peter Holewinski Sonoma County. The AAA does not endorse or recommend Terry Kelly any of the listings contained in the guide. The AAA also Sumedha Mona Khanna, MD does not guarantee or warrant any of the information Bonnie Lasky or services provided by businesses listed in this guide. Joy Lovinger Residents and users of the guide are encouraged to consult Bob Picker with appropriate and accredited professional advisors for Jim Redding advice concerning specific matters before making any Ruth Robeson decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Services Transportation Plan Update for the San Francisco Bay Area
    Coordinated Public Transit– Human Services Transportation Plan Update for the San Francisco Bay Area March 2013 Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland, CA 94607 TEL: 510.817.5700 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEB: www.mtc.ca.gov MTC COMMISSIONERS MANAGEMENT STAFF Adrienne J. Tissier, Chair Steve Heminger San Mateo County Executive Director Amy Rein Worth, Vice Chair Ann Flemer Cities of Contra Costa County Deputy Executive Director, Policy Tom Azumbrado Andrew B. Fremier U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Deputy Executive Director, Operations Tom Bates Cities of Alameda County PROJECT STAFF David Campos City and County of San Francisco Alix Bockelman Director, Programming and Allocations Dave Cortese Santa Clara County Ken Kirkey Director, Planning Bill Dodd Napa County and Cities Jennifer Yeamans Project Manager Dorene M. Giacopini U.S. Department of Transportation Drennen Shelton Transportation Service Provider Inventory and Outreach Federal D. Glover Contra Costa County Stella Wotherspoon GIS Analysis and Mapping Scott Haggerty Alameda County AMMA Transit Planning Anne W. Halsted Demographic Research and Mapping (GISWS), Best Practices San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Research, Veterans Transportation Needs, Transportation Commission Service Provider Inventory Update Steve Kinsey This Plan update based on work originally completed by Marin County and Cities Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates in developing the 2007 MTC Coordinated Public Transit–Human Services Sam Liccardo Transportation Plan Elderly & Disabled Component San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Jake Mackenzie Sonoma County and Cities COORDINATED PLAN UPDATE TECHNICAL ADVISORY Joe Pirzynski COMMITTEE Cities of Santa Clara County Paul Branson Jean Quan Marin Transit Oakland Mayor’s Appointee Patrick Finan Bijan Sartipi U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016-25 Citybus Short-Range Transit Plan
    2 | Page Table of Contents Chapter 1 ‐ Overview of Transit Services ............................................ 6 History ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Governance ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Organizational Structure ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Transit Services Provided and Area Served ............................................................................................................... 8 Fare Structure ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Revenue Fleet .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Existing Facilities ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2 ‐ Goals, Objectives, and Standards.................................... 15 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Sonoma County Transportation Authority November 4, 2019
    Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Sonoma County Transportation Authority November 4, 2019 scta.ca.gov 1 01 Project Background 02 Project Overview 03 Goals 04 Topics Analyzed 05 Opportunities OVERVIEW 06 Phased Recommendations AGENDA 07 Related Efforts & Next Steps scta.ca.gov 2 Project Background • MTC’s Transit Sustainability Project (2012) identified need for increased multi- operator coordination in Sonoma County • Growing focus on “seamlessness” within Bay Area’s transit network – SPUR Seamless Transit report (2015) – MTC Seamless Mobility initiative • Funded by MTC and City of Santa Rosa • Conducted by SCTA with consultant support from Nelson\Nygaard and McGuire Management Consultancy • Steering Committee: Petaluma Transit, Sonoma County Transit, Santa Rosa CityBus, SCTA, and MTC scta.ca.gov 3 Project Background Ongoing Coordination Historical Consolidation • Regular coordination meetings, T-TAC, • Sonoma County Transit has absorbed TPCC small local operators throughout the • Schedule coordination years • Fares – Sebastopol Transit • Transfer agreements – Healdsburg Transit • Clipper® – Cloverdale Transit • Paratransit • Shared bus stop signage • Joint procurements • Funding scta.ca.gov 4 Project Background Weekday Trips Sonoma County Local Bus Ridership in 2017: 3,548,655 Source: 2017 National Transit Database Annual Report Source:scta.ca.gov Sonoma County Travel Behavior Study Project Overview • How might the three local bus transit agencies improve the quality of service through coordination or integration? • What opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fare Free Muni System Feasibility Analysis
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fare Free Muni System Feasibility Analysis Prepared for: San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Prepared by: Sharon Greene + Associates In Association with: AECOM Consult, Inc. Transportation Management & Design, Inc. Causeway Financial Consulting, Inc. Posted January 29, 2008 Executive Summary 1.1 Purpose of Study At the request of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) and City Controller commissioned this study to analyze the costs and benefits to the City of San Francisco if fares were eliminated on the City’s public transit system (Muni). Muni is the eighth largest public transit operator in the United States1 and is a critical component of the City's and region's transportation system, economy and quality of life. The study team was charged with answering the following questions: • If fares were eliminated, how would Muni ridership increase or decrease? • What operational and capital items would be needed? • What operational and capital items would no longer be needed? • What policy issues would need to be addressed? • What are the key risk areas? The study teams incorporated data, plans, modeling and analyses provided by the SFMTA, the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA), the Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP) and other US transit systems with experience providing fare free service. Recent SFMTA ridership data2 and capital plans3 and the TEP Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Cost Model were also used to develop the study’s cost estimates of a fare free system. A literature review was conducted on US fare free systems and a survey of US transit systems with experience providing fare free service offered “lessons learned”, including the type and magnitude of associated costs and projected ridership increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum Agenda Item 3
    METRO P0 LI TAN Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter TRANSPORTATION 101 Eighth Street — Oakland, CA 94607-4700 COMMISSION TEL 510.817.5700 TDD/T1’Y 510.817. 5769 FAX 510.817.5848 E-MAIL [email protected] WEB www.rntc.ca.grw Memorandum Agenda Item 3 TO: Operations Committee DATE: March 7, 2014 FR: Executive Director W. I. 310-2700 RE: Contract Change Order — Implementation of Clipper® on Transit Operators in the East Bay and 101 Corridor and Integration of Next Generation Vehicle Devices: Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc. ($8,300,000) Project Status Report Clipper® Attachment 1 includes information about current system operations. Contract Actions Staff recommends that the Operations Committee authorize the Executive Director or his designee to negotiate and enter into the following contract action. Contract Change Order — Implementation of Clipper® on Transit Operators in the East Bay and 101 Corridor and Integration of Next Generation Vehicle Devices: Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc. ($8,300,000) The Clipper® fare payment system is currently available on eight transit agencies (AC Transit, BART, Caltrain, Golden Gate Transit and Ferry, SamTrans, SFMTA, VTA and San Francisco Bay Ferries), and accounts for 45 percent of all transit fares paid on Bay Area transit operators. MTC is currently deploying Clipper® to Mann Transit and the transit operators in Napa and Solano Counties (Soltrans. FAST, Vacaville City Coach. RioVista, and Napa VfNE). The Clipper Contractor, Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc. (Cubic), expects to complete the expansion work
    [Show full text]
  • Bee Wrong on Dairies Lots of Sizzle but No Records
    Letter to the Fresno Bee, Saturday, June 24, 2006: Bee wrong on dairies Despite The Bee's assertions (editorial June 17) that the Valley air district is only taking "baby steps" in its first efforts to regulate existing dairies, the fact is the district leads the nation in researching and regulating air pollution from agricultural sources. The recently adopted rule on animal facilities will reduce smog-forming chemicals Valleywide by at least 21 tons per day. That's equivalent to removing more than 1 million cars from Valley roads -- definitely not baby steps. In fact, that's a bigger reduction than any rule recently adopted anywhere in the state, including our own groundbreaking development mitigation rule, which was applauded by environmental advocates and community leaders, and heralded by a Bee editorial (Dec. 17, 2005) as an important step. With innovative and effective strategies, we have cut the Valley's smog in half. By every measure, our air quality is improving. Nonetheless, we face a monumental challenge in meeting new, more stringent standards. The Bee's mischaracterization of the dairy rule reinforces undeserved, tired stereotypes of the Valley and handicaps efforts to gain valuable allies among state and federal decision-makers. To succeed, we need everyone's active participation, and an accurate understanding of the real issues, progress and challenges. Seyed Sadredin, Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Lots of sizzle but no records By Doane Yawger The Merced Sun-Star June 26, 2006 Merced's temperatures reached triple digits over the weekend but no major problems were reported from the hot weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Summary of Bay Area Transit Operators: FY 2005-06
    STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF BAY AREA TRANSIT OPERATORS OF SUMMARY BAY STATISTICAL Fiscal Years 2005-06 Through 2009-10 STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF BAY AREA TRANSIT OPERATORS June 2011 I Fiscal Years 2005-06 to 2009-10 Fiscal Years StatSumm CVR_2010.indd 1 6/8/11 2:26 PM Statistical Summary of Bay Area Transit Operators Fiscal Years 2005–06 through 2009–10 June 2011 Prepared by Metropolitan Transportation Commission Programming & Allocations Section Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland, CA 94607 Tel 510.817.5700 TDD/TTY 510.817.5769 Fax 510.817.5848 Email [email protected] Web www.mtc.ca.gov Table of Contents 2 Introduction 4 Bay Area System — Statistical Summary Totals 6 Bay Area System — Regional Totals 8 Bay Area System — Performance by Operator Comparative Charts 11 Bay Area System — Total Transit Vehicle Fleet Operator Information 12 AC Transit (Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District) 16 ACE (Altamont Commuter Express) 20 Alameda Ferry Services 24 BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit District) 28 Benicia Breeze 32 Caltrain (Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board) 36 County Connection (Central Contra Costa Transit Authority) 40 Fairfield/Suisun Transit System 44 Golden Gate Transit (Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District) 50 Healdsburg Transit 54 LAVTA (Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority/Wheels) 58 Muni (San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency) 66 Petaluma Transit 70 Pleasanton Paratransit 74 Rio Vista Delta Breeze 78 SamTrans (San Mateo County Transit District) 82 Santa Rosa CityBus 86 Sonoma County Transit
    [Show full text]
  • Spare the Air ADVISORY
    Spare the Air ADVISORY For Immediate Release Contact: Karen M. Schkolnick August 28, 2007 415-749-4900 After hours; 415 816-5353 First Spare the Air Day of 2007 29 Transit Systems Offering Free Rides Tomorrow - Ride free on BART, CalTrain, ACE Train and all Bay Area Ferries UNTIL 1:00 PM - Ride free on Bay Area bus systems ALL DAY High temperatures and low winds are bringing the first Spare the Air Advisory of the 2007 summer smog season. Unhealthy air quality is forecast for tomorrow, Wednesday, August 29, in the Bay Area. This year, 29 transit systems have joined together to offer free rides on the first four non-holiday Spare the Air weekdays. “We are asking Bay Area residents to take action to protect air quality,” said Air District Executive Officer Jack Broadbent. “Although cooler than usual summer temperatures have provided the region with clear skies to date, that hasn’t reduced the importance of making clean air choices every day. Especially on a Spare the Air day, the Air District appeals to all residents to use public transportation and reduce driving." The 2007 Spare the Air/Free Transit incentive refines and expands the previous years’ parameters to include all transit operators in the region. “This unique partnership among the Air District, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), and the regional transit systems to provide free rides is made possible through special federal funding earmarked for the Bay Area,” said MTC Executive Director Steve Heminger. Motor vehicle exhaust, industrial emissions, gasoline vapors, and chemical solvents contain volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides that recombine in the presence of heat and sunlight to form ground-level ozone.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Residents Urged to Participate in Healthy Air Living Week
    Valley residents urged to participate in Healthy Air Living Week By Roxana Samano, Staff Reporter Turlock Journal, Thursday, June 12, 2008 Businesses, organizations and individuals living in the San Joaquin Valley are being urged to participate in a week long opportunity showcasing the ways they prioritize air quality in day-to-day decisions. Healthy Air Living Week will be celebrated July 7-13 and will focus on improving the health and quality of life for all Valley residents through efficient, effective, and entrepreneurial air quality management strategies. "Healthy Air Living Week is designed to get people to think about what they do everyday and to put air quality at the forefront of their daily decision making," Anthony Presto, public information representative for the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, said. "If everyone does this it will make a huge impact on air quality in the Valley." According the air district, residents of the San Joaquin Valley air basin breathe some of the most polluted air in the nation. The air basin fails to meet federal and state health-based standards for ozone and particulate matter. Although ozone is primarily a problem in the summer, when chemicals from vehicle and other emissions cook in sunlight and heat to form smog, particulate matter occurs primarily during the fall and winter. "Healthy Air Living Week is going to be a way for businesses to showcase what they can do all year long and for individuals to really think about what they can do all year long," Presto said. "We want as many people as possible to get out of their cars and explore alternative methods of transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Agency List
    Operated By (if different Agency from system name) When Where Phone Contact E-mail Bus Systems Regular meetings of the Board of Directors and Standing Committees Alameda-Contra Costa are held on the 2nd and 4th 2nd Floor Board Room (510) 891-7284 Transit District Wednesday of the month at 5:00 1600 Franklin St, (Board lnemeroff@actransit p.m. Oakland Secretary) .org (707) 259-8633 American Canyon Napa County The Board of Directors generally (Bd); (707) 251- Transit Transportation & Planning meets the third Wednesday of the NCTPA Board Room, 2800; 1-800-696- Agency month at 1:30 PM 625 Burnell St. in Napa. 6443 [email protected] Sonoma County Transit is a Cloverdale Transit division of the Sonoma County Transportation & (707) 576-7433; Public Works Department. see County Board of Supervisors (800) 345-7433 The Board meets on the third County Connection Thursday of the month at 9:00 a.m. 2477 Arnold Industrial Office: at CCCTA offices. Way, Concord 925.676.1976 [email protected] The Dumbarton Express service is administered and governed by AC Transit, with oversight by the Dumbarton Express Dumbarton Bridge Regional Operations Consortium (DBROC), comprised of AC Transit, Santa Clara VTA, Howard Der, AC BART, SamTrans, & Union Transit, City Transit staff. See AC Transit (510)891-7208 Operated By (if different Agency from system name) When Where Phone Contact E-mail Fairfield and Suisun Transit (707)422-BUSS Fairfield and Suisun (FAST) is a service of the (707)422-2877 [email protected] Transit (FAST) City of Fairfield. see City Council (transit office) a.us Board Room, Administration The Board of Directors meets on Building, Golden Gate the second and fourth Fridays of Bridge Toll Plaza, San DistrictSecretary@g Golden Gate Transit each month at 10:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Countywide Transportation Plan for Sonoma County
    2001 Countywide Transportation Plan for Sonoma County ADOPTED September 10, 2001 2001 Sonoma County Tranpsortation Authority Board of Directors Mike Kerns, Chair Paul Kelley Sonoma County Sonoma County Robert Jehn, V. Chair Jake Mackenzie Cloverdale Rohnert Park Joe Costello Larry Robinson Sonoma Sebastopol Geoffrey Fox Sam Salmon Cotati Windsor Mark Gleason Tim Smith Healdsburg Sonoma County Mike Healy Sharon Wright Petaluma Santa Rosa Prepared by the SCTA Suzanne Wilford, Executive Director Janet Spilman, Transportation Planner Jeanette Wood, Executive Assistant www.sonoma-county.org/scta 520 Mendocino Avenue Suite 240 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Phone: 707-565-5373 Fax: 707-565-5370 Special thanks to the Technical Advisory Committee and the Citizens Advisory Committee for their input and expertise. Thanks also to the Geographic Information Systems division at Sonoma County for maps featured in this Plan. Chapter 1 - Introduction ..................................................................... 1 Transportation Planning ...................................................................... 2 Sonoma County Transportation Authority ............................................ 3 Chapter 2 - Vision of the Future ......................................................... 7 Sonoma County Today and Tomorrow.................................................. 8 Expectations of a Transportation System .......................................... 13 A Community Vision .......................................................................... 14 Chapter
    [Show full text]