Analyses of Wild Ungulates Mitogenome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analyses of Wild Ungulates Mitogenome REVIEW ARTICLE | 1 Analyses of Wild Ungulates Mitogenome Toni TEŠIJA1 (✉) Toni SAFNER1,2 Summary In the last two decades, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has become one of the most used genetic markers for studying evolution and phylogeny. Understanding mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) structure, gene arrangements, base compositions and noncoding regions can reveal valuable information on various organisms, including wild ungulates. A huge number of sequenced mammalian mitogenomes are available on GenBank, including 8074 mitogenome sequences of wild ungulates. The Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) approach can reveal mitogenome regions that can explain the variation in populations. Such variations could show ungulates’ resistance to pathogens or processes of their adaptation. Despite the extensive number of new sequenced mitogenomes, there is still a lot of ambiguity around the mitogenome architecture. Methods for NGS, genome assembly and annotation are still in the process of development, aiming to make these tools powerful enough to reveal enormous knowledge crucial for assessing wild ungulate species’ conservation status, and their ecological status. In this review paper, we describe the methods and principles derived from mtDNA studies on wild ungulate species. We outline basic sequence preparation methods and specialized software for mitogenome assembly and annotation. Additionally, we present several different approaches of mitogenome comparison. Key words mitochondrial DNA, mitogenome, mtDNA assembly, mtDNA annotation, wild ungulates, phylogeny 1 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biometrics, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2 Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv), Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia ✉ Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: May 28, 2020 | Accepted: September 23, 2020 aCS Agric. conspec. sci. Vol. 86 (2021) No. 1 (1-12) 2 | Toni TEŠIJA, Toni SAFNER INTRODUCTION can be passed to progeny. On the other hand, the number of such mutations accumulating in the coding region is small, since they The Structure of Mitochondrial DNA might be lethal, and only lesser number of them is passed down to future generations (Gupta et al., 2015). Mitochondria are organelles in eukaryotic cells responsible for producing energy, which play a pivotal role in mammals’ Since the D-loop region is the most rapidly evolving part of temperature regulation (Boore, 1999; Wallace, 2007). During the mitogenome (Upholt and Dawid, 1977; Walberg and Clayton, the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) process (that results 1981), where the largest number of mutations is accumulated, in adenosine triphosphate ATP synthesis), mitochondria oxidize it is commonly used as a molecular marker for finding genetic metabolic substrates in order to generate energy and water. differentiation between animal species, as well as between The metabolic processes differ between taxa (da Fonseca et al., individuals of the same species (Gupta et al., 2015). 2008), essentially depending on species’ metabolic requirements Another mtDNA region with high diversity is cytochrome (e.g. body size, diet, high altitudes). Mammal mtDNA is a c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), which is often used as animal DNA small (~16 kb) circular molecule with two strands (Heavy or barcoding system. Animal barcoding systems are used to provide H strand and Light or L strand), divided in two parts: coding additional information for species that are not correctly identified and non-coding. The coding part contains 13 protein-coding by typical techniques based on morphology (Naseem et al., 2020). genes (PCGs) for OXPHOS, the 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNA) Hebert et al. (2003) proposed an approach where, based on the for protein translation and 2 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA) nucleotide sequence diversity in the COI gene, it is possible to for the mitochondrial ribosome. This part is highly conserved differentiate species from diverse taxonomic groups. for mammalian mitogenomes and has a low rate of gene rearrangements compared to the nuclear genome (Wolstenholme, 1992). The H strand encodes 12 PCGs, 2 rRNA genes and 14 tRNA D-loop Region Structure and Repeating Sequences genes and it is rich in guanin. The L strand encodes one subunit Most of the mammals have similar D-loop location and (ND6) and 8 tRNA genes (Barshad et al., 2018; Barchiesi and organization. The D-loop is located between the genes encoding Vascotto, 2019). The non-coding parts of mtDNA comprise three tRNAs Pro and Phe and it consists of three main domains. The first parts: the control region (CR, Displacement loop, D-loop), the domain is called the right domain (or conserved sequence blocks, OL region (the origin of L-strand replication), and the intergenic CBS) and is adjacent to the tRNA gene encoding Phe. This region regions. The D-loop is long about 700-1,300 bp in length while the contains crucial regulatory parts for replication, transcription of OL is long about 30 bp. The intergenic regions (spacers) are located both strands and the segment with conserved sequence blocks within some genes. MtDNA genes do not have introns, except (CBSs) involved in the processing of RNA primers for synthesis of for the intergenic spacers that are limited to a few bases, or, in H-strand. The second is the left domain (or the extended terminal some cases, completely absent from the mitogenome (Taanman, associated sequenced domain, ETAS), which is adjacent to the 1999). Dromedary camel (C. dromedaries) has a total of 116 bp tRNA gene encoding Pro. In this region synthesis of the heavy of intergenic regions (22 different locations) in its mitogenome strand is paused. The third part is the central conserved domain. (Manee et al., 2019), which is identical or very similar for species It is presumed to be the site of origin for replication and the most within the same genus. DNA and RNA synthesis start in D-loop highly conserved region of the D-loop (Saccone et al., 1991; Sbisà regions (Saccone et al., 2000), which are well conserved (Garesse et al., 1997; Shadel and Clayton, 1997; Boore, 1999). and Vallejo, 2001). However, other parts of the D-loop regions present the most polymorphic region of mtDNA (Upholt and As mentioned before, the main factors defining the variability Dawid, 1977; Shadel and Clayton, 1997). Those variable parts of of the D-loop region are processes during replication, but there the D-loop evolve four to five times faster in comparison to other are other contributing factors such as the different numbers of regions of mitogenome (Fumagalli et al., 1996). repeating sequences (RS). These regions are common in the ETAS and CSB domains (Polziehn and Strobeck, 2002; An et al., 2010; The replication of mammalian mitogenome is asymmetric Meadows et al., 2011). Furthermore, the highest rate of sequence since the two strands are synthesized from two distinct replication variation between individuals is found in hypervariable region 1 sites. The H strand replication site (OH) is located at the D-loop and hypervariable region 2 (Miller et al., 1996; Jazin et al., 1998). region while L strand is in the OL region located between the The D-loop is responsible for length variations of mitogenomes due genes encoding tRNAs asparagine and cystine (Hixson et al., to the number of RS across different taxa (Brown et al., 1996; Xu 1986). During replication, the H strand is replicated first, and et al., 2005; Meadows et al., 2011; Cui et al., 2012). In mammalian the parental H strand remains single until it is paired with D-loop regions, the RS have been found in five positions (RS 1-5). newly synthesized L strand. Before pairing, the parental H RS1 and RS2 are found in the ETAS domain of the D-loop, where strand is exposed to oxidative damage because it is only partially the H strand replication pauses; RS3, RS4, and RS5 are found in protected by proteins. This process is one of the causes of large the CBS domain, upstream of the site for the H strand origin of number of mutations in mtDNA. In addition, nuclear proteins replication (Hoelzel et al., 1994). that are transported from cytosol into mitochondria are directly involved in mitochondrial function and can cause mutations Mitogenome Sequence Variations in mitochondrial genes (Patrushev et al., 2014). The rate of the mutations caused by those reasons is the highest in the D-loop In the coding sequence, the first and second positions of the region of mtDNA (Brown and Simpson, 1982; Reyes et al., 1998). codon are often stable, but the third position mutates fast (Kimura, Mutations accumulating in D-loop region are not lethal, and they 1968). The mtDNA does not have the same repair system as the aCS Agric. conspec. sci. Vol. 86 (2021) No. 1 Analyses of Wild Ungulates Mitogenome | 3 nuclear DNA, which means it is exposed to rapid molecular and investigated the relationship between the compositional evolution (Matosiuk et al., 2014). The changes in base composition features of all three positions in amino acids and third positions might lead to modifications in amino acid composition (Foster et of fourfold degenerate codons. They concluded that transcribed H al., 1997). The changes in genome sequence are divided into four strand is richer in G base compared to L strand (L strand mRNAs different types: sequence rearrangements, additions, deletions and are very poor in G, particularly in the third position), and that A substitutions (Brown, 1985). The most common type of mutations nucleotide is more represented on L strand, while C and T differ in mitogenome are nucleotide substitutions. The substitution among species. rate has been estimated to be about 5-10 times greater than in the nuclear DNA, although rates vary between different parts of Why Study Mitochondrial DNA? the mitogenome (Brown et al., 1979). The substitutions can be detected as synonymous (i.e. silent) or nonsynonymous (Jukes MtDNA studies are a valuable tool for understanding and Bhurshan, 1986).
Recommended publications
  • Browsing and Non-Browsing Extant and Extinct Giraffids Evidence From
    Browsing and non-browsing extant and extinct giraffids Evidence from dental microwear textural analysis Gildas Merceron, Marc Colyn, Denis Geraads To cite this version: Gildas Merceron, Marc Colyn, Denis Geraads. Browsing and non-browsing extant and extinct giraffids Evidence from dental microwear textural analysis. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecol- ogy, Elsevier, 2018, 505, pp.128-139. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.05.036. hal-01834854v2 HAL Id: hal-01834854 https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01834854v2 Submitted on 6 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Browsing and non-browsing extant and extinct giraffids: evidence from dental microwear 2 textural analysis. 3 4 Gildas MERCERON1, Marc COLYN2, Denis GERAADS3 5 6 1 Palevoprim (UMR 7262, CNRS & Université de Poitiers, France) 7 2 ECOBIO (UMR 6553, CNRS & Université de Rennes 1, Station Biologique de Paimpont, 8 France) 9 3 CR2P (UMR 7207, Sorbonne Universités, MNHN, CNRS, UPMC, France) 10 11 1Corresponding author: [email protected] 12 13 Abstract: 14 15 Today, the family Giraffidae is restricted to two genera endemic to the African 16 continent, Okapia and Giraffa, but, with over ten genera and dozens of species, it was far 17 more diverse in the Old World during the late Miocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensive Population Genetic Structure in the Giraffe
    BMC Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe David M Brown1, Rick A Brenneman2, Klaus-Peter Koepfli1, John P Pollinger1, Borja Milá1, Nicholas J Georgiadis3, Edward E Louis Jr2, Gregory F Grether1, David K Jacobs1 and Robert K Wayne*1 Address: 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA, 2Center for Conservation and Research, Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, 3701 South 10th Street, Omaha, NE 68107, USA and 3Mpala Research Centre, PO Box 555, Nanyuki, Kenya Email: David M Brown - [email protected]; Rick A Brenneman - [email protected]; Klaus-Peter Koepfli - [email protected]; John P Pollinger - [email protected]; Borja Milá - [email protected]; Nicholas J Georgiadis - [email protected] ; Edward E Louis - [email protected]; Gregory F Grether - [email protected]; David K Jacobs - [email protected]; Robert K Wayne* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 21 December 2007 Received: 2 October 2007 Accepted: 21 December 2007 BMC Biology 2007, 5:57 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-57 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/5/57 © 2007 Brown et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: A central question in the evolutionary diversification of large, widespread, mobile mammals is how substantial differentiation can arise, particularly in the absence of topographic or habitat barriers to dispersal.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Analysis
    Threat analysis: West African giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis peralta) in Republic of Niger April 2020 Kateřina Gašparová1, Julian Fennessy2, Thomas Rabeil3 & Karolína Brandlová1 1Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha Suchdol, Czech Republic 2Giraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia 3Wild Africa Conservation, Niamey, Niger Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Nigerien Wildlife Authorities for their valuable support and for the permission to undertake the work. Particularly, we would like to thank the wildlife authorities’ members and rangers. Importantly, we would like to thank IUCN-SOS and European Commission, Born Free Foundation, Ivan Carter Wildlife Conservation Alliance, Sahara Conservation Fund, Rufford Small Grant, Czech University of Life Sciences and GCF for their valuable financial support to the programme. Overview The Sudanian savannah currently suffers increasing pressure connected with growing human population in sub-Saharan Africa. Human settlements and agricultural lands have negatively influenced the availability of resources for wild ungulates, especially with increased competition from growing numbers of livestock and local human exploitation. Subsequently, and in context of giraffe (Giraffa spp.), this has led to a significant decrease in population numbers and range across the region. Remaining giraffe populations are predominantly conserved in formal protected areas, many of which are still in the process of being restored and conservation management improving. The last population of West African giraffe (G. camelopardalis peralta), a subspecies of the Northern giraffe (G. camelopardalis) is only found in the Republic of Niger, predominantly in the central region of plateaus and Kouré and North Dallol Bosso, about 60 km south east of the capital – Niamey, extending into Doutchi, Loga, Gaya, Fandou and Ouallam areas (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • CONCERTED ACTION for the GIRAFFE (Giraffa Camelopardalis) 1 Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at Its 13Th Meeting (Gandhinagar, February 2020)
    CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/Concerted Action 13.3 MIGRATORY Original: English SPECIES CONCERTED ACTION FOR THE GIRAFFE (Giraffa camelopardalis) 1 Adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its 13th Meeting (Gandhinagar, February 2020) The proposal for the Concerted Action for the Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) was first adopted by the 1st Giraffe Experts Meeting held in Windhoek, Namibia from 9 to 11 July 2019 (i). Proponents: Cameroon, Chad, Ethiopia, Kenya, Niger, the United Republic of Tanzania, Zimbabwe (ii). Target species, lower taxon or population, or group of taxa with needs in common: Class: Mammalia Order: Artiodactyla Family: Giraffidae Genus, Species: Giraffa camelopardalis (Linnaeus 1758) Updated Giraffe taxonomy IUCN Red List taxonomy IUCN Red List (Fennessy et al. 2016a, Winter et (Muller et al. 2018) Category al. 2018) Vulnerable Giraffa camelopardalis peralta Giraffa camelopardalis peralta (Fennessy et al. (West African Giraffe) (West African Giraffe) 2018a) Critically Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum Endangered (Kordofan Giraffe) (Kordofan Giraffe) (Fennessy & Marais 2018) Critically Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis Endangered (Nubian Giraffe) (Nubian Giraffe) (Wube et al. 2018) Near Threatened Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi (Fennessy et al. (Nubian Giraffe) (Rothschild’s Giraffe) 2018b) Giraffa reticulata Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata Endangered (Reticulated Giraffe) (Reticulated Giraffe) (Muneza et al. 2018) Giraffa tippelskirchi Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi Endangered (Masai Giraffe) (Masai Giraffe) (Bolger et al. 2019) 1 The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CMS Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019/20 Note from the GCF Directors: 2019 Marks the Tenth Anniversary of the Giraffe in the Wild Throughout Africa
    Annual Report 2019/20 Note from the GCF Directors: 2019 marks the tenth anniversary of the giraffe in the wild throughout Africa. As Giraffe Conservation Foundation (GCF) giraffe conservation gains more airtime since it was officially registered as the first- internationally, new players enter the ever giraffe conservation charity in conservation stage, which can only be the world. beneficial for giraffe and their future in Africa. Even so, no other organisation Message from the This is an appropriate occasion for us covers the same geographical and technical to reflect on what has been achieved breadth of giraffe conservation as GCF GCF Board Chair with regard to giraffe conservation and does throughout the African continent. on how much GCF has grown during its first decade. Our team now comprises 19 And so, we will continue with what we 2019 marks a decade of the Giraffe people, who are based in six countries. do best: working with a wide range of Conservation Foundation (GCF) GCF works on, manages and supports partners towards a sustainable future for making a difference in saving some giraffe conservation initiatives that concern all giraffe populations in Africa. We take of the most majestic mammals on all four species of giraffe in 15 African this opportunity to thank all of you for the planet. When I first visited Julian countries. Giraffe conservation is now being your continued support, partnership and and Steph Fennessy in Windhoek, guided by National Giraffe Conservation friendship. Thank you for sticking your Namibia, GCF was mostly a concept – Strategies and Action Plans in four African necks out for giraffe conservation in Africa an idea – that had been developed by countries, which were all developed with during this last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability Among Later Stone Age Hunter-Gatherers
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Spring 5-15-2020 Variability Among Later Stone Age Hunter-gatherers Mica Jones Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Mica, "Variability Among Later Stone Age Hunter-gatherers" (2020). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2206. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/2206 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Anthropology Dissertation Examination Committee: Fiona Brigid Marshall, Chair Stan Braude Michael Frachetti T.R. Kidder Xinyi Liu Helina Woldekiros Variability Among Later Stone Age Hunter-gatherers in Eastern Africa by Mica Bryant Jones A dissertation presented to The Graduate School of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2020 St. Louis, Missouri © 2020, Mica Bryant Jones Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liebe ID-Freunde
    [Back to internetlibrary.html] Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig 8 May 2007 (last update 16 October 2010), updates 27 Oct. 2007 with Appendix on Cameron & du Toit 2007: "Winning by a Neck…" pp .62-78; 5 Oct. 2008 some language corrections and a brief comment on Brown et al. 2007: "Extensive population genetic structure in the giraffe" on p. 79. The Evolution of the Long-Necked Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis L.) What do we really know? (Part 2) As for Part 1, see http://www.weloennig.de/Giraffe.pdf Some Questions, Facts and Quotations to Supplement Part 1 Repetitio est mater studiorum –Repetition is the best teacher (literally: the mother of studies) Summary Introduction: the story which is commonly taught in high schools about the evolution of the long- necked giraffe by natural selection (feeding-competition-hypothesis) fails to explain, among other things, the size differences between males and females. Giraffe cows are up to 1.5 meters shorter than the giraffe bulls, not to mention the offspring. The wide migration range of the giraffe and the low heights of the most common plants in their diet likewise argue against the dominant selection hypothesis. Now to the main points: 1) The fossil „links“, which according to the theory should appear successively and replace each other, usually exist simultaneously for long periods of time. 2) Evolutionary derivations based on similarities rely on circular reasoning (to refer once more to Kuhn's statement) 3) The giraffe has eight cervical vertebrae. Although the 8th vertebra displays almost all the characteristics of a neck vertebra, as an exception to the rule the first rib pair is attached there.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Giraffe
    AFRICA’S GIRAFFE A CONSERVATION GUIDE CONTENTS Introduction 1 Evolution 2 Giraffe & humans 2 Giraffe facts 3 Taxonomy & species 5 Distribution & habitat 7 Masai giraffe 9 Northern giraffe 10 Kordofan giraffe 10 Nubian giraffe 11 West African giraffe 12 Reticulated giraffe 13 Southern giraffe 14 Angolan giraffe 14 South African giraffe 15 Conservation 17 Status & statistics 17 IUCN Red List 17 Species & numbers 18 CITES & CMS 20 Stakeholders 20 Threats 21 Limiting factors 22 Significance of giraffe 24 Economic 24 Ecological 24 The future 25 Giraffe Conservation Foundation 26 Bibliography 27 BILLY DODSON In order to address this, the Giraffe Conservation Foundation (GCF) has drafted an Africa-wide Giraffe Strategic Framework, which provides a road-map for giraffe conservation throughout Africa, and supports several governments in developing their first National Giraffe Conservation Strategies and Action Plans. Now is the time to act for giraffe, before time runs out. Evolution Helladotherium, a three-metre-tall antelope-like animal, which once WIKIMEDIA COMMONS roamed the plains and forests of Asia and Europe between the Eocene and Oligocene epochs 30-50 million years ago, is the forefather of the two remaining members of the Giraffidae family: the giraffe we know today, and the okapi. To date, more than ten fossil genera have been discovered, revealing that by the Miocene epoch, 6-20 million years ago, early deer-like These giraffe images, which are carved life-size and with incredible detail into rock, are believed giraffids were yet to develop the characteristic long neck of today’s giraffe. to date back 9,000 years to a time when the Sahara was wet and green.
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Care Standards an Overview of Standards for the Keeping of Wild Animals in Captive Care Settings in Malawi the Aap Foundation
    CAPTIVE CARE STANDARDS AN OVERVIEW OF STANDARDS FOR THE KEEPING OF WILD ANIMALS IN CAPTIVE CARE SETTINGS IN MALAWI THE AAP FOUNDATION WRITTEN BY ING. J IEPEMA DR. A. SALB ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These Standards would not have been completed without the support of numerous organisations, stakeholders and individuals. They were produced by Lilongwe Wildlife Trust (LWT) on behalf of the Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) and the Department of Animal Health and Livestock Development (DAHLD), with financial support from the AAP Foundation and technical input from a working group. Members of the working group included: Mr. W. Mgoola Assistant Director (Research & Development), DNPW Mr. C. M. Manda Deputy Director (Conservation Services), DNPW Dr. J. Nkhoma Animal Health Officer & Focal Point on Wildlife, DAHLD Dr. A. Salb Head of Veterinary Services/Wildlife Emergency Rescue Unit, LWT Ing. J. Iepema Sanctuary Manager, LWT Dr. J. Kazembe Senior Lecturer, Department of Environmental Sciences and Management, LUANAR Mr. E. Zakochera Senior Education Officer, WESM In the process of developing this document, many organisations and individuals from all over the world provided information regarding existing standards for keeping wild animals in captivity. Our thanks go to the Lilongwe Society for the Protection and Care of Animals (LSPCA), the Pan African Sanctuary Alliance (PASA), the Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries (GFAS), the American Zoo Association (AZA) and the European Associated of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). A special thanks goes
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Analysis: West African Giraffe
    Threat analysis: West African giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis peralta) in Republic of Niger April 2020 Kateřina Gašparová1, Julian Fennessy2, Thomas Rabeil3 & Karolína Brandlová1 1Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha Suchdol, Czech Republic 2Giraffe Conservation Foundation, Windhoek, Namibia 3Wild Africa Conservation, Niamey, Niger Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Nigerien Wildlife Authorities for their valuable support and for the permission to undertake the work. Particularly, we would like to thank the wildlife authorities’ members and rangers. Importantly, we would like to thank IUCN-SOS and European Commission, Born Free Foundation, Ivan Carter Wildlife Conservation Alliance, Sahara Conservation Fund, Rufford Small Grant, Czech University of Life Sciences and GCF for their valuable financial support to the programme. Overview The Sudanian savannah currently suffers increasing pressure connected with growing human population in sub-Saharan Africa. Human settlements and agricultural lands have negatively influenced the availability of resources for wild ungulates, especially with increased competition from growing numbers of livestock and local human exploitation. Subsequently, and in context of giraffe (Giraffa spp.), this has led to a significant decrease in population numbers and range across the region. Remaining giraffe populations are predominantly conserved in formal protected areas, many of which are still in the process of being restored and conservation management improving. The last population of West African giraffe (G. camelopardalis peralta), a subspecies of the Northern giraffe (G. camelopardalis) is only found in the Republic of Niger, predominantly in the central region of plateaus and Kouré and North Dallol Bosso, about 60 km south east of the capital – Niamey, extending into Doutchi, Loga, Gaya, Fandou and Ouallam areas (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Poaching and Use of Parts As a Threat to Giraffe in Northern Kenya
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 3-26-2020 Human-Giraffe Interactions: Characterizing Poaching and Use of Parts as a Threat to Giraffe in Northern Kenya Kirstie Ruppert University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Ruppert, Kirstie, "Human-Giraffe Interactions: Characterizing Poaching and Use of Parts as a Threat to Giraffe in Northern Kenya" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3177. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3177 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HUMAN-GIRAFFE INTERACTIONS: CHARACTERIZING POACHING AND USE OF PARTS AS A THREAT TO GIRAFFE IN NORTHERN KENYA By Kirstie A. Ruppert B.S. University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 M.A. Miami University, 2015 A DISSERTATION Summitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology & Environmental Sciences The Graduate School University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Dr. Carly Sponarski, Assistant Professor of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, Advisor Dr. Jenny Glikman, Associate Director at San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research Dr. Sandra De Urioste-Stone, Associate Professor of Nature-based Tourism Dr. Caroline Noblet, Associate Professor of Economics Dr. Laura Rickard, Associate Professor of Communication and Journalism © 2020 Kirstie Ruppert ii HUMAN-GIRAFFE INTERACTIONS: CHARACTERIZING POACHING AND USE OF PARTS AS A THREAT TO GIRAFFE IN NORTHERN KENYA By Kirstie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Giraffe in Kenya Range and Habitat Where Do You Find Giraffe in Kenya?
    Taxonomy & Populations Class: Mammalia (Mammals) KENYA’S GIRAFFE c Conservation Guide Order: Artiodactyla c Thank you to Farid Abdin, Cindy Armstrong, Poulomee Basu and Billy Dodson for providing the images and map. Family: Giraffidae c Genus & Species: Nubian giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis camelopardalis Formerly known as Rothschild’s giraffe, it has been shown to be genetically identical to Nubian giraffe, a subspecies of northern giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis Reticulated giraffe Giraffa reticulata formerly known as subspecies G. c. reticulata Masai giraffe Giraffa tippelskirchi formerly known as subspecies G. c. tippelskirchi Where do you find giraffe in Kenya? Giraffe in Kenya Up until now, giraffe have always been classified as one Although the range of giraffe in Kenya has dramatically decreased in the past few years, they still continue to exist, mostly in protected species with nine subspecies, occurring throughout 21 areas, in 27 of the 47 counties. Masai giraffe are now limited to the southern parts of Kenya: ranging from the Nairobi National Park countries in Africa. However, new research shows that southwards through the Athi Plains, and eastwards from the Masai Mara Ecosystem to the Amboseli Ecosystem, Chyulu Hills National there are now four distinct species of giraffe, of which Park, Taita Ranches and Tsavo West National Park. Marula Valley Farm is home to the northernmost population of Masai giraffe, whilst three occur in Kenya. Reticulated giraffe roam northern other populations are found in and around Hell’s Gate National Park. and eastern Kenya; Masai giraffe inhabit the savanna and woodlands of southern Kenya; and the Nubian giraffe Reticulated giraffe, on the other hand, roam throughout northern Kenya: through the Marsabit National Park and Reserve, Samburu, (formerly Rothschild’s giraffe), which has been reduced Shaba and Buffalo National Reserves, northern rangelands and conservancies, and various private lands.
    [Show full text]