Eponymic Structures in Human Anatomy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eponymic Structures in Human Anatomy THE GLASGOW MEDICAL JOURNAL. No. VI. December, 1895. ORIGINAL ARTICLES. EPONYMIC STRUCTURES IN HUMAN ANATOMY. By JAMES FINLAYSON, M.D., Physician to the Glasgow Western Infirmary and to the Royal Hospital for Sick Children ; Honorary Librarian to the Faculty of Physicians and Surgeons, Glasgow, &c. During last winter on6 of my "bibliographical demonstrations" in our Faculty library here was designed to illustrate eponymic structures in anatomy. I had often felt that the names of great men in our profession which had happened to be preserved in the nomenclature of anatomy furnished about the only instruction in the history of medicine which many of our students acquired. Every one knows at least the name of Herophilus in this way; and not a few know that he was of the Alexandrian school before the Christian era. How many know as much of his equally famous contemporary, Erasistratus ? But the names attached to the structures they are studying are usually mere names: very often not even the vaguest idea of their date or nationality is associated with them. How many of our students, in speaking of the capsule of Glisson or the foramen of Winslow, know whether Glisson or Winslow was an Englishman ? In preparing my demonstration I had the aid of two of my clinical assistants?Dr. John Love and Dr. John W. Findlay? No. 6. 2 C Vol. XLIV. 402 Dr. Finlayson?Eponymic Structures in Anatomy. without whose help I could not possibly have attempted the work. We searched out all the eponymic structures we could find, and then we searched out the books or papers of the authors, where these are described by them, whenever this was possible. Cards were then written with the name of the author, his nationality and designation, and the date of his birth and death. These were laid on the volumes, which were arranged on long tables in rough chronological order, as precision is impossible in this respect. We began with the fragments of Herophilus collected by Marx, and went on to the works of living men. Marks were often inserted in the volumes where the structures were described or delineated. The volumes arranged in this way gave a vivid idea of the progress of anatomy; and the illustrations were, of course, of very special interest to those who had never seen them before. So much labour had been expended on this demonstration that it seemed desirable to expend a little more in making the list even more complete, so that it might be published for the use of others, although, no doubt, the sight of the books and plates was really the specialty of the demonstration. In printing this list, an alphabetical rather than a chrono- logical order seemed to be more useful and practicable. The dates given are those of the birth and death when these were ascertained. In the case of living authors, a dash (?) after the date of birth indicates that death had not occurred, or was not known to have occurred. In some cases, only the date of birth or of death was known; in others, the date of graduation was all that was available; in a few, the date of the paper concerned with the name of the structure was the only clue; or perhaps the date of a professorial appointment. In some cases, the nationality as judged by birth is different from that acquired by residence or professorial duties?in a few cases this correction has been added when it was known. Indications of the locality of some of the less known structures have been added in brackets to aid the memory of the reader, or to guide him; but no attempt, of course, at precise definition is made in such a list. The structures included in the list are those only which pertain to human anatomy. Purely microscopic terms, and those found only in comparative anatomy and embryology, and many terms in anthropology, have been omitted; but the line of demarcation cannot be drawn absolutely, and the general interest or currency of the term has determined the inclusion of some names near the border line. Dr. Finlayson?Eponymic Structures in Anatomy. 403 The data here given, however bald they may seem, are not always readily obtained; very possibly errors of various kinds may be detected by those whose reading and studies bear more on such subjects than mine; Mr. Henry E. Clark has already given me some help in this direction. Very many sources of information had to be searched, but the following are amongst the most important: ? The New Sydenham Society's Lexicon, Wernich's Biograpihisches Lexikon, and the Surg eon-General's Index-Catalogue of the Medical Library at Washington. The propriety of naming structures after men need not be discussed here. The actual fact is that they are so named; and the chronological arrangement showed very plainly how much this had increased within the last 100 years. This table may help to lessen what is apt to be a grave inconvenience. Abernethy, John, English surgeon and anatomist, 1764?1831. ?Abernethy's fascia (over external iliac artery). Alcock, Thomas, English surgeon, 1784?1833.?Canal of (for internal pudic artery). Andersch, c. S., German anatomist, close of eighteenth century. ?Ganglion of (petrous of glosso pharyngeal). Arantius (or Aranzi), Julius Caesar, Italian anatomist, 1530 ?1589.?Corpora Arantii; Duct of and Canal of (ductus venosus); Ventricle of (end of calamus scriptorius). Arnold, F., German anatomist, born 1803.?Ganglion of (otic); Nerve of (auricular branch of vagus); Suspensory ligament of (incus); Convolution of (posterior inferior, occipito-temporal lobe); Membrane of (pigmented layer of iris). Auerbach, Leopold, German anatomist, 1824?.?Ganglion of; Plexus of (in small intestine). Baillarger, J., French physician, 1815?.?Lines of (in brain). Barkow, Hans Karl Leopold, Professor of anatomy in Breslau, 1798?1873.?Ligament of (in olecranon fossa). Bartholin, Thomas, Danish physician, 1616 or 1619?1680.? Glands of Bartholin ; Duct of Bartholin (sublingual). Baudelocque, Jean Louis, French accoucheur, 1745?1810.? Line of (external conjugate diameter of pelvis). Bauhin, Caspar, French anatomist, 1560?1624. ? Valve of; Glands of (tongue). VOn Bechterew, W., Russian neurologist, living.?Nucleus of (near Deiters', in medulla). Bell, Sir Charles, Surgeon and physiologist in London (Scottish birth), 1774?1842.?External respiratory nerve of; Muscle of (trigone of bladder). 404 Dr. Finlayson?Eponymic Structures in Anatomy. Bellini, L., anatomist of Florence, 1643?1704.?Ligament of (hip-joint); Ducts of (kidneys). Bernard, Claude, French physiologist, 1813?1878.?Canal of (supplementary duct of pancreas). Bertin, E. J., French anatomist, 1712?1781.?Ligament of (ilio- femoral); Bones of (in sphenoid); Septa or Columns of (between pyramids of kidney). Bichat, M. F. Xavier, Professor of anatomy and physiology in Paris, 1771?1802.?Fissure of (cerebellum); Foramen of (third ventricle). Bidder, Heinrich F., German anatomist, 1810?(papers published in 1866 and 1868).?Ganglion of (auriculo-ventricular septum). Bigelow, John Milton, American surgeon, 1846?.?Ligament of (ilio-femoral or Y-shaped). Blandin, Philippe Frederic, French surgeon, 1798?1849.? Glands of (tongue). Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich, German anatomist, 1752? 1840.?Clivus or plane of (in sphenoid). Bochdalek (Father), Victor Alexander, Professor of anatomy in Prague up till 1869. Bochdalek (Son), Victor, Anatomist in Prague (papers published from 1866).?Ganglion of (above upper canine tooth). Bock, Au. C-, German anatomist (book on ganglionic system pub- lished in 1817 to 1821).?Nerve of (pharyngeal); Ganglion of (cavernous). Boerhaave, Hermann, Dutch physician, 1668?1738.?Glands of (sudoriparous). Botalli, Leonard, Italian anatomist, born 1530; lived in France from 1561 till 1585.?Foramen of Botalli (foramen ovale); Ligament of (obliterated ductus arteriosus). Bowman, Sir William, English anatomist and physiologist, and ophthalmic surgeon, 1816?1892.?Glands of (in olfactory mucous membrane); Bowman's capsule (in kidney); Bowman's discs (muscles); Bowman's lamellae, (of cornea); Muscle of (fibres in ciliary muscle). Breschet, Gilbert, French anatomist, 1784?1845.?Canals of (in diploe, for) Breschets veins ; Sinus of (spheno-parietal). Broca, P., French surgeon and anthropologist, 1824?1880.? Convolution of. Brodie, Sir Benjamin, English surgeon, 1783?1862.?Bursa of (knee). Bruch, Max. Julius Friedrich (thesis published in Berlin in 1835). Glands of (in conjunctiva, synonymous with trachoma glands of Henle) ; Muscle of (ciliary); Membrane of (choroid). Briicke, Ernst, German physiologist, 1819?.?Muscles of (ciliary muscle). Bryant, Thomas, English surgeon, licensed 1849 (living).? Triangle of (ilio-femoral at hip). r Dr. Finlayson?Eponymic Structures in Anatomy. 405 Brunner, Johann Conrad, Swiss anatomist, 1653?1727.?Bmn- ner's glands. ? Burdach, K. F., German anatomist. 1776?1847.?Columns of Burdacli. Burow (Father), August, German surgeon, 1809?1874. Burow (Son), Ernst, German surgeon, 1838?1885.? Veins of (con- necting portal and general circulation). Burns, Allan, Glasgow anatomist, 1781?1813.?Ligament of (at saphenous opening); Space of (in neck). Camper, Pierre, Dutch physiologist, 1722--1789.?Facial angle of; Ligament of (in urethra); Fascia of; Inter-columnar bands. Carcassonne, Bernard Gauderic, French surgeon, born 1728. ?Ligament of (deep perineal fascia). Casserio, Giulio, Italian anatomist, 1545?1616.?Perforated muscle of Casserius (coraco-brachialis); Artery of (internal carotid and middle meningeal); Nervus perforans Casserii (musculo-cutaneous). Chassaignac, c. M. E., French surgeon and anatomist, 1805
Recommended publications
  • Galen's Elementary Course on Bones by CHARLES SINGER, M.D
    25 Section of the History of Medicine 767 came into camp, after receiving an abdominal wound, holding up his bowels. This man survived to play the traitor on the Greeks and to sail off two days after his appearance in camp. There are two wounds of the flank, in one of which the wound is said to have let out the entrails, but in the second case "the spear thrust through the corselet, and though it tore clean off the flesh of the flank, it did not mingle with the bowels of the hero". Another wound described by Homer is well worth notice: Antilochos leaped on his opponent and wounded him "and severed all the vein that runs up the back till it reaches the neck". This is the only time that a vein is mentioned by Homer, and he could, of course, be referring to the aorta, although he has already defined the clavicle as separating the neck from the breast, and the aorta does not reach into the neck. But there is a continuous venous structure running along the back, namely the right innominate vein, the superior vena cava, the right auricle, and the inferior vena cava. These together may have been the structure referred to, the vein which was severed. In conclusion, it may be appropriate to ask the following question: Did Homer know of the frontal sinus? To answer this question in the affirmative one case may be considered: Antilochos slew a Trojan warrior, driving a spear through the helmet ridge into the warrior's brow, "and the point of the bronze passed within the bone".
    [Show full text]
  • André Vésale (1514–1564) À La Conquête Des Publics (Ou Comment Acquérir Un Nom Immortel Dans L’Histoire Des Sciences En Insultant Ses Maîtres) Hélène Cazes
    Document generated on 10/01/2021 10:59 a.m. Renaissance and Reformation Renaissance et Réforme La fabrique de la controverse : André Vésale (1514–1564) à la conquête des publics (ou Comment acquérir un nom immortel dans l’histoire des sciences en insultant ses maîtres) Hélène Cazes Tensions à l’âge de l’imprimé : conflit et concurrence des publics Article abstract dans la littérature française de la Renaissance When Andreas Vesalius published the Seven Books on the Fabric of the Human Tensions in the Age of Printing: Audience Conflict and Competition in Body in 1543, it was with satisfaction that he created a scandal in the field of French Literature of the Renaissance medicine and, more generally, among cultivated European readers. Assuming Volume 42, Number 1, Winter 2019 a voice of authority in medicine at the age of twenty-eight, he developed his account of dissection as a series of personal observations and denunciations of URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1064522ar poor anatomists, beginning with his masters. But not only was this irreverence public, it also created a public, represented on the frontispiece of the work: it DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1064522ar established the book as a tribunal of science. The first victim to be tried was Jacques Dubois, professor in Paris’ Faculty of Medicine; his response, published See table of contents in 1551, fuelled a lengthy posthumous debate, feeding the controversy upon which Vesalius’s posterity is founded. Publisher(s) Iter Press ISSN 0034-429X (print) 2293-7374 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Cazes, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Et Savoirs, 15 | 2021 Giovanni Manardo and Jacques Dubois on John Mesuë’S Medical Substances 2
    Arts et Savoirs 15 | 2021 Revisiting Medical Humanism in Renaissance Europe Giovanni Manardo and Jacques Dubois on John Mesuë’s Medical Substances Giovanni Manardo et Jacques Dubois à propos de la matière médicale de Jean Mesuë Dorothea Heitsch Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/aes/3798 DOI: 10.4000/aes.3798 ISSN: 2258-093X Publisher Laboratoire LISAA Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2021 Electronic reference Dorothea Heitsch, “Giovanni Manardo and Jacques Dubois on John Mesuë’s Medical Substances”, Arts et Savoirs [Online], 15 | 2021, Online since 25 June 2021, connection on 26 June 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/aes/3798 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/aes.3798 This text was automatically generated on 26 June 2021. Centre de recherche LISAA (Littératures SAvoirs et Arts) Giovanni Manardo and Jacques Dubois on John Mesuë’s Medical Substances 1 Giovanni Manardo and Jacques Dubois on John Mesuë’s Medical Substances Giovanni Manardo et Jacques Dubois à propos de la matière médicale de Jean Mesuë Dorothea Heitsch 1 Opera Mesuae is a compilation of four texts: Canones universales, De simplicibus, Grabadin1, and Practica. These four texts originated in roughly ten Hebrew, some Italian, and more than seventy Latin manuscripts circulating in Europe from the thirteenth to the eighteenth century2. From the late fifteenth to the early seventeenth century, Mondino de Liuzzi, Giovanni Manardo3, Jacques Dubois (Jacobus Sylvius; who was also responsible for the Neo-Latin translation), and Giovanni Costeo added commentaries and additions to subsequent editions of Opera Mesuae. In the following pages, I show that this medical database is at the crossroads of translation, exchange, humanistic rhetoric, the medical schools of Italy and France, printing, and transnational conversations.
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Vesalius, the Predecessor of Neurosurgery: How His Progressive
    Historical Vignette Andreas Vesalius, the Predecessor of Neurosurgery: How his Progressive Scientific Achievements Affected his Professional Life and Destiny Bruno Splavski1-3, Kresimir Rotim1,2, Goran Lakicevi c4, Andrew J. Gienapp5,6, Frederick A. Boop5-7, Kenan I. Arnautovic6,7 Key words Andreas Vesalius, the father of modern anatomy and a predecessor of neuro- - 16th Century science, was a distinguished medical scholar and Renaissance figure of the 16th - Anatomy - Andreas Vesalius Century Scientific Revolution. He challenged traditional anatomy by applying - Death empirical methods of cadaveric dissection to the study of the human body. His - Neuroscience revolutionary book, De Humani Corporis Fabrica, established anatomy as a - Pilgrimage scientific discipline that challenged conventional medical knowledge, but often From the 1Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre Milosrdnice caused controversy. Charles V, the Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain to University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Osijek whom De Humani was dedicated, appointed Vesalius to his court. While in 3 University School of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; Osijek Spain, Vesalius’ work antagonized the academic establishment, current medical University School of Dental Medicine and Health, Osijek, Croatia; 4Mostar University Hospital, Mostar, Bosnia and knowledge, and ecclesial authority. Consequently, his methods were unac- Herzegovina; 5Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children’s ceptable to the academic and religious status quo, therefore, we believe that his 6 Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; Semmes-Murphey professional life—as well as his tragic death—was affected by the political Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; and 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science state of affairs that dominated 16th Century Europe. Ultimately, he went on a Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA pilgrimage to the Holy Land that jeopardized his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Servetus and Calvin
    1 SERVETUS AND CALVIN From the Introduction to Michel Servetus “Thirty Letters to Calvin & Sixty Signs of the Antichrist”, translated by Marian Hillar, and Christopher A. Hoffman, from Christianismi restitutio of Michael Servetus (Lewiston, NY; Queenston, Ont., Canada; Lampeter, Wales, UK: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2010). Marian Hillar Michel de Villeneuve in Paris and Lyon (1531-1536) We shall begin this introduction with a moment when Servetus returned to Basel after publishing his first book De Trinitatis erroribus in 1531, in Haguenau, in Alsace. Servetus’s book spread all over Europe and he sent several copies to his friends in Italy. It became the seed from which was born Socinianism, an antitrini- tarian, biblical unitarian religious movement which was organized in Poland in the second half of the sixteenth century. Melanchthon, in order to stop the spread of these ideas, sent to the ministers of Venice a letter with a warning against the "impious error of Servetus."1 In his eagerness Servetus also sent copies to Spain, even one to the archbishop of Zaragoza, and to Erasmus. Erasmus did not judge the work favorably and wanted to distance himself from antitrinitarian ideas since he already had enough problems. Back in Basel, Servetus was not persecuted, and Oecolampadius recommended that the City Council ignore him if he recanted his views. He wrote: “Servetus's book contained some good things which were rendered dangerous by the context. The work should be either completely suppressed or read only by those who would not abuse it.”2 Servetus requested in a letter to Oecolampadius permission to stay and to be able to send the copies destined for France undisturbed.
    [Show full text]
  • SYLVIUS and the REFORM of ANATOMY by C
    SYLVIUS AND THE REFORM OF ANATOMY by C. E. KELLETT THE first half of the sixteenth century in France is characterized by a rapid change in the ways of thinking and learning, and of the structure of society itself, by the emergence ofa wealthy and educated middle class. The institutions of the planned medieval state survived but often with a curious change in balance. Philosophy became closely allied with Humanism and flourished not in the schools of the Faculty ofTheology but amongst the colleges of theJunior Faculty of Arts.' The most influential of its teachers, Le Fevre, who played so important a part in the reformation, was a Master of Arts who began his studies in Theology but never became even a Bachelor in that Faculty.2 In the same way Sylvius, who was a pupil of Le Fevre and also from Picardy, achieved his reformation of anatomical training within the colleges of the Junior Faculty and, though long after he had achieved fame as an Anatomist, he took his Doctorate at Montpellier, he never proceeded to the Licence of the Faculty in Paris, remaining a Bachelor.3 There are at present over 6o,ooo students in the University of Paris, perhaps four times as many as there were then, for the Venetian Ambassador, Marino Cavalli, is quoted by Lefranc as reporting in I546 that there were I6-20,000 students, for the most part impoverished, in the University and that there was no lack ofteachers who were, ifanything poorer, or as Lefranc puts it, 'bien chetifs'. Many of these were studying for a higher degree in Law or Divinity but by a special act5 it was not possible to do this while taking the course for a degree in Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • 91 Franciscus Sylvius Eminente Neuroanatomista Y Jacobo Sylvius Eminente Galenista
    FRANCISCUS SYLVIUS EMINENTE NEUROANATOMISTA Y JACOBO SYLVIUS EMINENTE GALENISTA FRANCISCUS SYLVIUS EMINENT NEUROANATOMIST AND JACOBO SYLVIUS EMINENT GALENIST Campohermoso-Rodríguez O F1, Solíz-Solíz R E2, Campohermoso-Rodríguez O3, Quispe-C. A4, Flores-Huanca R I5 1. Médico Cirujano, Docente Emérito de Medicina, Jefe de Cátedra de Anatomía Humana, UMSA. 2. Médico Cirujano, UMSA. Salud Reproductiva y Sexual. 3. Médico Cirujano, UMSA. Docente de Anatomía Humana, UMSA y UNIVALLE. 4. Estudiante de Medicina, UMSA. Auxiliar de Docencia de Anatomía. 5. Estudiante de Medicina, UMSA. INTRODUCCIÓN Francia. Posteriormente se establecieron como comerciantes en la pequeña ciudad protestante El Dr. Justiniano Alba, odontólogo y profesor de Hanau, cerca de Frankfurt, Alemania. Estudió, de neuroanatomía de muestra Facultad de su educación primaria, en la Academia Calvinista Medicina, halla por los años 70s, indicaba que el de Sedan en la región de las Ardenas, donde surco lateral del cerebro se denominaba cisura estudió filosofía y medicina.2 Antes de partir a de Silvio, epónimo en homenaje a François de Leiden, en 1633, presentó una tesis para el grado la Boe Sylvius, más conocido como Franciscus de licenciatura en medicina en la que defendió Sylvius, y el conducto mesencefálico de Silvio fervientemente la teoría de la circulación de la epónimo en homenaje a Jacques Dubois Sylvius sangre formulada cinco años antes en 1628 por más conocido como Jacobo Sylvius. Por lo tanto, William Harvey. enseñaba, que no debíamos confundirlos como un solo autor. Figura N° 1. Franciscus Sylvius o François De Le Boe FRANCISCUS SYLVIUS O FRANZ DE LE BOE Franciscus Sylvius (Fig. 1), nació en Alemania, vivió la mayor parte de su vida y carrera profesional en la Universidad de Leiden en Holanda.
    [Show full text]
  • Vesalius on Animal Cognition
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) On the innovative genius of Andreas Vesalius Brinkman, R.J.C. Publication date 2017 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Brinkman, R. J. C. (2017). On the innovative genius of Andreas Vesalius. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:07 Oct 2021 Chapter 10 Vesalius on animal cognition Chapter based on article Andreas Vesalius (1515-1564) on animal cognition Brinkman R.J., Hage J.J., Oostra R.J., van der Horst C.M.A.M. (Submitted for publication) 121 Chapter 10. Vesalius on animal cognition Introduction Until well in the 19th century, the Aristotelian concept of scala naturae (ladder of nature) was the most common biological theory among Western scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones in Understanding Pulmonary Circulation: from Antiquity to Heart-Lung Machine
    diagnostics Review Milestones in Understanding Pulmonary Circulation: From Antiquity to Heart-Lung Machine Adam Torbicki Department of Pulmonary Circulation, Thromboembolic Diseases and Cardiology, Center for Postgraduate Medical Education, ECZ-Otwock, 05-400 Otwock, Poland; [email protected] Abstract: Human pulmonary circulation is as full of mysteries and surprises as is the history of attempts to uncover and understand them. The Special Issue of Diagnostics, appearing after 2020 immobilized the world, give us an opportunity, space and momentum to remind to our medical community at least the main milestones which mark the progress that was made before our times. This review’s aim is to remind about pioneers and their ideas which now are considered as if they were always with us—which is not the case . Keywords: pulmonary circulation; history; milestones; pulmonary hypertension; renaissance; au- topsy; heart catheterization 1. Introduction Human pulmonary circulation is full of mysteries and surprises, as is the history of attempts to uncover and understand them. Until the 1990s, only a very restricted group of explorers ventured on research journeys through the labyrinth of the pulmonary vascular Citation: Torbicki, A. Milestones in bed. This no man’s land between cardiology and pulmonology was largely unexplored Understanding Pulmonary compared to systemic circulation. Circulation: From Antiquity to Over the past two decades, the number of clinicians considering themselves experts Heart-Lung Machine. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 381. https://doi.org/ in pulmonary circulation rose exponentially. Most of them knew everything about current 10.3390/diagnostics11020381 risk stratification in pulmonary hypertension and therapeutic strategies based on three main pathophysiological pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Books and French Medical Libraries in the Renaissance
    Graheli, S. (2017) Italian books and French medical libraries in the Renaissance. In: Bellingradt, D., Nelles, P. and Salman, J. (eds.) Books in Motion in Early Modern Europe: Beyond Production, Circulation and Consumption. Series: New directions in book history. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, pp. 243-266. ISBN 9783319533650 (doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53366-7_11) There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/140730/ Deposited on 13 May 2017 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Shanti Graheli (St Andrews), Italian Books and French Medical Libraries in the Renaissance This chapter is an analysis of French medical libraries in the Renaissance, and of the role played by Italian books within this social and cultural environment.1 There are a number of reasons for picking these two samples – the French physicians, and the Italian books – and interweaving them into a single discussion. The connections between Italy and France in the early modern period were particularly intense, due to political and cultural reasons. In particular, the unfolding of the Italian Wars (1494-1559) saw a series of campaigns led with the objective of conquering parts of the Italian peninsula that the French monarchs perceived as part of their own heritage, such as Naples and Milan. The result of these contacts was not merely political; the French returned home accompanied by Italian artists and intellectuals, as well as carrying numerous objects such as paintings, sculptures, and books.2 Italo-French exchanges are then added to the quite independent development of the medical discipline at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Servetus (1511-1553) and the Discovery of Pulmonary Circulation
    Hellenic J Cardiol 2009; 50: 373-378 Historical Perspective Michael Servetus (1511-1553) and the Discovery of Pulmonary Circulation 1 2 2 CHRISTODOULOS STEFANADIS , MARIANNA KARAMANOU , GEORGE ANDROUTSOS 11st Cardiology Department, 2Department of History of Medicine, Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece Key words: Servetus, Michael Servetus was the first doctor ever to challenge and scientifically argue against the theories of Galen, pulmonary which predominated for 14 centuries in medical schools worldwide. Even though he was relatively correct in circulation, Galen, scientific terms, Servetus was punished because of his boldness in challenging Galen’s theories and was con- Harvey, Colombo, demned to death by the Holy Inquisition. Yet, by publicly challenging Galen’s and Hippocrates’ predominant Cesalpino. and unquestionable lessons on medicine for the first time, Servetus opened the door for other doctors to chal- lenge and correct those theories and subsequently to bring about a new view of human anatomy and physiol- ogy. This article underlines the contribution of Servetus to the description of the pulmonary circulation. he discovery of the blood circulation Spanish origin. Michael Servetus (also cannot be attributed to a single per- known as Miguel Servet) was born in 1511 T son, nor even to a single era. In fact, (or 1509, according to some sources) at many errors were in need of correction, and Tudelle, which was located in the kingdom each and every one of those errors had to be of Navarre, Spain. In fact, he actually gave replaced with the truth. two identities during his successive interro- Manuscript received: During the fourteen centuries that fol- gations in Vienna, at Dauphiné (France), January 14, 2009; lowed the death of Galen (131-201 CE), and in Geneva.1 The Great French Inquisitor Accepted: when European doctors would religiously must have been unaware of Servetus’ rejec- April 29, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Diapositiva 1
    Davide Zaffe Great Anatomists 1400-1900 (Arranged by date of birth) 3rd version BMN Modena Italy Leonicenus translated ancient Greek and Arabic medical texts, and wrote the first scientific paper on syphillis. He was the leader of the Humanistic Medicine, which overcame the Medieval Medicine, and composed the first criticism of the Natural History of Pliny the Elder, pointing out his medical errors. Brasavola, Bembo and, according to some people, Paracelsus were his pupils. (Nicolò da Lonigo) LEONICENUS 1428 Lonigo VI (I) - 1524 Ferrara (I) As a successful artist, Leonardo dissected several human corpses to observe and paint the anatomical features. Leonardo’ anatomical drawings include studies on the skeleton and muscles, prefiguring the modern science of biomechanics, the vascular system, the internal and sex organs, also making the first scientific draws of a fetus in utero. Leonardo made more than 200 drawings and prepared to publish a theoretical work on anatomy, but the book Treatise on painting was published only in 1680. LEONARDO da Vinci 1452 Vinci FI (I) - 1519 Cloux (F) Sylvius was a very popular teacher of anatomy. His most distinguished student was Andreas Vesalius, but later Sylvius contrasted the innovative and revolutionary view of the Anatomy of Vesalius’ Fabrica. Sylvius gave a name to the muscles, previously referred only by numbers. Sylvius described satisfactory the sphenoid bone and the vertebrae, but wrongly the sternum. Sylvius introduced a number of anatomical terms that have persisted, such as crural, cystic, gastric, popliteal, iliac, and mesentery. Jacques (Dubois) SYLVIUS 1478 Loeuilly (F) - 1555 Paris (F) 1 Pupil of Leonicenus, Brasavola was a leading exponent of the Ferrara Medical School, tanks to own great anatomical knowledge.
    [Show full text]