DOCSLIB.ORG

Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues MEDIA WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER GUIDE womens media center .com to Covering Reproductive Issues Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues By Sarah Erdreich Edited by Rachel Larris The Women’s Media Center would like to thank the organizations that contributed substantially to the information within this guide: the Guttmacher Institute, the National Abortion Federation, the National Women’s Law Center, and Health Care for America Now. We would also like to thank the many individuals who personally contributed. They include Anna Benyo, Gretchen Borchelt, Melissa Fowler, Mara Gandal-Powers, Kim Haddow, Sharon Levin, Elizabeth Nash, Vicki Saporta, and Judy Waxman. Staff and board members of the Women’s Media Center have informed, reviewed and edited the content. They include: Michelle Kinsey Bruns, Julie Burton, Cristal Williams Chancellor, Gloria Feldt, Kate McCarthy, Gloria Steinem, and Jamia Wilson. WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER ABOUT THE WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER The Women’s Media Center has the goal of making women visible and powerful in media. Media are the most powerful economic and cultural force in shaping attitudes and knowledge of facts and events. By deciding who gets to talk, what issues are reported, who writes, what is important and how it is framed, the media shapes our understanding of who we are and what we can be. The Women’s Media Center works to level the playing field for women and girls through our media monitoring, training, original content and activism. Currently, we are rarely using half of our talent in this country, and only hearing half the story. We live in a racially and ethnically diverse nation that is 51 percent female, but the news media remain limited. Our Women’s Media Center SheSource database of women experts is the go-to resource for journalists, bookers and producers seeking women experts to appear on TV and to quote in print and online media. When looking for an expert perspective or source on leading issues of the day, SheSource can connect journalists to leading experts from every field. We also publish reports on the media, such as our annual Women’s Media Center’s Status of Women in the U.S. Media report, which includes the results of our own media monitoring and aggregate research carried out by other organizations that monitor women in the media. We tell women’s stories by creating content — publishing original Women’s Media Center feature stories on our website, www.womensmediacenter.com, and other channels including our radio show on CBS, Women’s Media Center Live with Robin Morgan — and through special projects, such as Women’s Media Center’s Women Under Siege Project, which reports sexualized violence in conflict zones, to promote media parity for women’s issues. The Women’s Media Center’s Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues is a resource to use and share. If there are additional reproductive health or rights issues on which you need information, or additional sources and/or experts you need for your coverage, let us know. Designed by Diahann Hill Copyright 2013 Women’s Media Center. No part of this publication can be reproduced without permission in writing from the Women’s Media Center. WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1: Words you need to know ................................................................... 5 CONTENTS Chapter 2: Polling, language and public opinion on abortion and birth control ....... 13 Pro-life, pro-choice, or something else: language and framing .............................. 19 Is “anti-abortion” accurate? ........................................................................... 22 Polling on birth control .................................................................................. 23 Chapter 3: The Supreme Court ......................................................................... 25 The Supreme Court ...................................................................................... 25 What happens when a restriction on abortion is challenged in court ..................... 28 Chapter 4: The Hyde Amendment and federal health care coverage of abortion ..... 29 Chapter 5: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and women’s health ........................... 31 The Medicaid expansion .............................................................................. 31 Women’s health provisions in the Affordable Care Act ....................................... 32 Contraceptive coverage requirement in the Affordable Care Act .......................... 34 Abortion coverage under the Affordable Care Act ............................................. 35 Chapter 6: State legislation to restrict abortion and access to family planning ......... 37 Abortion bans based on fetal pain ................................................................. 38 Mandatory ultrasounds ................................................................................. 40 Sex- and race-selective abortion bans ............................................................. 42 Personhood measures .................................................................................. 42 Telemedicine and restrictions on medical abortions ............................................ 43 Mandatory counseling and waiting periods ..................................................... 44 Refusal clauses............................................................................................ 47 Removing Planned Parenthood from eligibility for state family planning funds........... 48 Insurance restrictions and the Affordable Care Act ............................................. 50 Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers laws (TRAP Laws) ................................ 51 Abortion reporting requirements ..................................................................... 53 Redefinitions of ‘justifiable homicide’ ............................................................... 53 Chapter 7: Violence directed at doctors, staff and clinics ...................................... 55 Curbing clinic violence: The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act)..... 57 Free speech or harassment ............................................................................ 59 Chapter 8: Fact and fiction in reproductive issues ................................................ 63 Abortion and breast cancer ........................................................................... 63 Abortion and infertility .................................................................................. 64 Abortion and suicide/depression ................................................................... 64 Post-abortion syndrome ................................................................................. 65 Ultrasounds and women seeking abortion ........................................................ 66 Emergency contraception and abortion ........................................................... 67 Planned Parenthood and black neighborhoods ................................................. 68 Abortion and medical necessity to save lives .................................................... 68 Chapter 9: Directory of groups that oppose abortion and reproductive rights .......... 69 Chapter 10: Directory groups that support reproductive rights, health and justice .... 79 WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues Why you’re likely to be reporting on reproductive freedom in 2013 America is observing the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court deci- INTRODUCTION sion that recognized reproductive freedom — the right to decide whether and when to have a child — as a right included in the constitutional right to privacy. While women have this right in principle and on paper, they may not be able to exercise it if they are poor, in the military or otherwise dependent on government health care, or if they are under 18 and live in one of the 38 states that require parental consent and/or permission from a judge. In addition, 87 percent of U.S. counties have no abortion services, so inability to travel also limits access. Between 2010 and 2011, state legislators introduced 2,050 new reproductive health- and rights-related provisions, while 2012 ranked as the second highest for the number of reproductive health-restrictive bills. The Guttmacher Institute reports that there has always been a spike in state legislation following an election year. This is partially because there are four state legislatures that don’t meet in even years and, according to Guttmacher, also possibly because legislators are less likely to oppose reproductive freedom when they are up for re-election.1 There is reason to believe that 2013 will again see an overwhelming number of states introducing or passing legislation that would restrict reproductive freedom. The media have a very important role to play in keeping the public informed about crucial developments — both at the state and federal level — that would affect pub- lic health. Legislation or other official decrees that change how women can obtain or pay for health services deeply affect individuals and populations. Reporters and commentators have the power to tell this story, and thus the responsibility to make sure it is accurate. The purpose of this media guide: To give reporters and media outlets factual, histor- ic, legal, medical, polling and policy sources. Covering reproductive issues can be difficult.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lane Center Series Volume 3 Pope Francis And
    THE LANE CENTER SERIES VOLUME 3 FALL 2015 POPE FRANCIS AND THE FUTURE OF CATHOLICISM IN THE UNITED STATES: The Challenge of Becoming a Church for the Poor The Lane Center Series Published by the Joan and Ralph Lane Center for Catholic Studies and Social Thought University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117-1080 www.usfca.edu/lane-center ISSN 2372-3467 Authors retain the copyright to their essays. Queries regarding permissions should be sent to the authors using the email addresses provided with their essays. Published by the Joan and Ralph Lane Center for Catholic Studies and Social Thought of the University of San Francisco, The Lane Center Series promotes the center’s mission to advance the scholarship and application of the Catholic intellectual tradition in the church and society with an emphasis on social concerns. The series features essays by Lane Center scholars, guest speakers, and USF faculty. It serves as a written archive of Lane Center events and programs and allows the work of the center to reach a broader audience. Produced by the Joan and Ralph Lane Center for Catholic Studies and Social Thought 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Erin Brigham, David E. DeCosse, and Michael Duffy, editors The Francis Effect: A Better Catholic Values Debate in American Public Life? John Gehring Pope Francis and the Consistent Ethic of Life John Coleman, S.J. The Church as a Field Hospital: The Ecclesiology of Pope Francis Erin Brigham Intrinsic Evil: A Guide for the Perplexed William O’Neill, S.J. Confronting the “Economy of Exclusion” from the Ground Up John Baumann, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies & Tools for Gender Equality
    Strategies & Tools for Gender Equality First Edition: Abortion Rights Religious Refusals May 2015 © 2015 Legal Voice COMPILED BY THE ALLIANCE: STATE ADVOCATES FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS & GENDER EQUALITY OF THE STATES, BY THE STATES, FOR THE STATES Strategies & Tools for Gender Equality TABLE OF CONTENTS • Alliance Organizations Overview ............................................................. 3 • Introduction ............................................................................................. 5 Part 1: Securing and Advancing Abortion Rights • Introduction ............................................................................................. 9 • California Women’s Law Center: California ........................................... 10 • Gender Justice: Minnesota .................................................................... 17 • Legal Voice: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Alaska .................. 19 • Southwest Women’s Law Center: New Mexico ..................................... 30 • Women’s Law Project: Pennsylvania ..................................................... 40 Part 2: Combating Religious Refusals Targeting Women and LGBTQ Individuals • Introduction .......................................................................................... 53 • California Women’s Law Center: California ........................................... 54 • Gender Justice: Minnesota, Nebraska ................................................... 62 • Legal Voice: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Alaska .................. 66
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Losing
    IRAQ: THE CASE FOR LOSING Duncan Kennedy* What follows is the lightly edited text of a lecture delivered at the Brooklyn Law School Symposium on War and Trade on September 22, 2005. I argued that, as of the date of the lecture, the United States had already been defeated in Iraq, predicted an exit strategy likely to be adopted by the Bush administration, and assessed the likely consequences of the defeat for the various participants in the conflict. I ended with a statement that we should embrace our defeat as good for the world at large, however terrible for the Iraqi people. Of course, by the time the text went to the printer, much had changed, and by the time it finds its way into the reader’s hands, yet more will have changed. I am grateful to the Brooklyn Journal of International Law for its willingness to publish the lecture nonetheless, as a contribution to the debate on the war and also to the archive of anti-war speeches that may interest future historians of the domestic conflict over the conflict. ** I. INTRODUCTION his is a talk about the Iraq War and its consequences in world poli- Ttics. It is in the form of a prediction supported by an analysis. The prediction is that the Bush administration will choose as its exit strategy to misrepresent as a victory the defeat of the United States in Iraq, a defeat that has already happened and is irrevocable. I will argue that it is a good thing, on balance, taking into account different effects on different actors, that the United States has been defeated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Women in the U. S. Media 2013
    WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER The Status of Women in the U. S. Media 2 0 1 3 By Diana Mitsu Klos womensmediacenter.com WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER The Status of Women in the U. S. Media 2 0 1 3 By Diana Mitsu Klos Copyright 2013 Women’s Media Center. No part of this publication can be reproduced without permission in writing from the Women’s Media Center. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ............................................................................. 5 What we found ................................................................................ 5 Overview ........................................................................................ 7 Tectonic shifts in media and business models .......................................... 8 About the Women’s Media Center and this report ................................ 9 Newspapers .................................................................................... 10 Male print/online journalists wrote the majority of election stories and primarily quoted men ............................................................... 11 2012 OpEd Project byline report: Who narrates the world? ................... 16 Women in obituaries ....................................................................... 17 Online-only news sites ...................................................................... 20 Women and digital news consumption ............................................... 21 Television ......................................................................................... 22 Radio .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Legal Document
    Case 2:20-cv-00293 Document 1 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION WOMEN’S HEALTH CENTER OF WEST VIRGINIA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Hon. PATRICK MORRISEY, et al., Defendants. EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Plaintiff Women’s Center of West Virginia, on behalf of itself, its staff, its physicians, and its patients, hereby respectfully moves this Court for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) pursuant to Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to block enforcement of the Governor of West Virginia’s Executive Order 16-20 (the “Order”) as applied to prohibit Plaintiff from providing abortion care when, in the physician’s good-faith medical judgment and based on the panoply of relevant factors, delaying the abortion would prevent the patient from obtaining an abortion in West Virginia or would otherwise compromise the patient’s long-term health. In support of this Motion, Plaintiff concurrently submits a memorandum and declarations, which are hereby incorporated within this Motion by reference. Plaintiff also seeks a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, blocking enforcement of the Order as applied in the way described above, in order to protect current and future patients from imminent and irreparable harm to their health, safety, and constitutional right to decide whether and when to bear a child. Case 2:20-cv-00293 Document 1 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2 As detailed more fully in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, Plaintiff satisfies the requirements for a TRO and subsequent preliminary injunctive relief.
    [Show full text]
  • My Changing Body: Puberty and Fertility Awareness for Young
    My Changing Body: Puberty and Fertility Awareness for Young nd People, 2 Edition A Pilot Study in Guatemala and Rwanda Submitted December 2011 The Institute for Reproductive Health Georgetown University INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY WWW.IRH.ORG © 2011. Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University Recommended Citation: My Changing Body: Puberty and Fertility Awareness for Young People, 2nd Edition. A Pilot Study in Guatemala and Rwanda. December 2011. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The Institute for Reproductive Health (IRH) is part of the Georgetown University Medical Center, an internationally recognized academic medical center with a three-part mission of research, teaching and patient care. IRH is a leading technical resource and learning center committed to developing and increasing the availability of effective, easy-to- use, fertility awareness-based methods (FAM) of family planning. IRH was awarded the 5-year Fertility Awareness-Based Methods (FAM) Project by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in September 2007. This 5-year project aims to increase access and use of FAM within a broad range of service delivery programs using systems-oriented scaling up approaches. This publication was made possible through support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement No. GPO-A-00-07-00003-00. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of USAID or Georgetown University. The FAM Project Institute for Reproductive Health Georgetown University 4301 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 310 Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lib Schtick Op
    The Lib Schtick Op. 1 No. 1 September 5, 2004 Introduction Welcome (and welcome back) to the Liberal Party! "The Lib Schtick" is the weekly whipsheet where you will learn what the Libs have planned this week and other trivia. We've got a great semester ahead of us, and we hope to see many of you in the coming weeks. ~~Jade~~ Activities Lib Dinner Monday, September 6, at 5:30 pm, in Commons We'll be returning to Commons for our weekly dinners, where we will eat under the portrait of George H.W. Bush. Come to meet the libs, exchange stories of summer excitement, or for the great cuisine. **Enter through the rotunda on Grove Street; Beinecke Plaza is still closed for construction** Lib Discussion Tuesday, September 7 JE Common Room, 7:30 pm Topic: A Yale education is the ultimate in conspicuous consumption. Did we come here for the great education, or the brand name? Are we being prepared for the intellectual challenges that will confront us after we graduate, or the cocktail parties? Come tell us what you think on Tuesday. YPU Debate Thursday, September 9, SSS 114, 7:30 pm Resolved: Same sex marriage weakens marriage as a social institution. The YPU guest this week is Maggie Gallagher, president of the Institute of Marriage and Public Policy. Think that she's wrong? Speak out against her. Contact Sophie Brill ([email protected]) if you know now that you'd like to give a speech. Otherwise, come listen, ask questions, or decide to speak later in the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Counseling & Referral Hotline
    the summer 2014 advocatePlanned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Celebrating the Counseling & Referral Hotline All-Volunteer Program Turns 40 For volunteers on PPLM’s Counsel- medically-accurate, comprehensive, assistance with decisions ing and Referral Hotline, there is no nonjudgmental information about sexual and reproductive health care. typical shift. Volunteer counselors The Counseling and Referral I had unprotected help callers with topics ranging from Hotline grew out of an independent sex last night. the risks of unprotected sex and organization called the Pregnancy Am I at risk for symptoms of sexually transmitted Counseling Service, which was estab- an STD? infections, to how and where to get lished in 1969 to help Massachusetts a pregnancy test and answering women facing unintended pregnancies. In 1974, the service joined Planned questions about abortion. Parenthood League of Massachusetts “Some calls are quick and easy to and expanded to become the Coun- answer,” says Jen, a volunteer since seling & Referral Hotline. Today, the 2013. “Others involve in-depth coun- hotline is staffed by a core of 50 highly- seling. Recently, I was able to help trained volunteers who accept more assistance with pregnancy options, a caller who just started a relation- than 20,000 calls per year. and may provide the caller with infor- ship with a partner who has a sexu- “We have so much more informa- mation about adoption agencies, ally transmitted infection. We talked tion to share now,” says Pat, who has parenting resources, or where a woman about how the infection is transmitted, been a hotline volunteer for more than can obtain an abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Work of Pre-Abortion Counselors
    Understanding the Work of Pre-abortion Counselors A dissertation presented to the faculty of The Patton College of Education of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jennifer M. Conte December 2013 © 2013 Jennifer M. Conte: All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Understanding the Work of Pre-abortion Counselors by JENNIFER M. CONTE has been approved for the Department of Counseling and Higher Education and The Patton College of Education by Yegan Pillay Associate Professor of Counseling and Higher Education Renée A. Middleton Dean, The Patton College of Education 3 Abstract CONTE, JENNIFER M., Ph.D., December 2013, Counselor Education Understanding the Work of Pre-abortion Counselors Director of Dissertation: Yegan Pillay This qualitative study examined the experiences of individuals who work in abortion clinics as pre-abortion counselors. Interviewing was the primary method of inquiry. Although information regarding post-abortion distress is documented in the literature, pre-abortion counseling is rarely found in the literature. This study sought to fill a void in the literature by seeking to understand the experience of pre-abortion counselors. The documented experiences shared several themes such as a love for their job, having a non-judgmental attitude, and having a previous interest in reproductive health care. 4 Preface In qualitative methodology, the researcher is the instrument (Patton, 2002). Therefore, it is important to understand the lenses through which I am examining the phenomena of pre-abortion counseling. The vantage point that I offer is influenced by my experiences as a pre-abortion counselor. I have considered myself to be pro-choice ever since I can remember thinking about the topic of abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Crisis Pregnancy Centers Dawn Stacey M.Ed, LMHC
    The Pregnancy Center Movement: History of Crisis Pregnancy Centers Dawn Stacey M.Ed, LMHC Facing an unplanned pregnancy can be an overwhelming time for many women, so many may seek guidance from a health-care clinic. It is important to find a clinic that will provide accurate, complete, and reliable information about all of your pregnancy options. Be especially cautious of crisis pregnancy centers as many advertise and name themselves to give the impression that they are neutral health-care providers. The majority of these facilities, however, have an anti-abortion philosophy. The pregnancy center movement is growing in the United States and dates back to its founding father, Robert Pearson. The Pregnancy Center Movement: According to Time magazine, crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are typically associated with Christian charities and are usually under the umbrella of one of three national groups – Heartbeat International, Care Net, and the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates. Two of these groups sponsor at 24-hour toll-free hotline where women can call for a referral to a CPC near them. They also fund billboards and pay a lot of money to try to gain top placement on the sponsored-links sections on internet search engines. These billboards appear to be neutral and helpful for women who are facing an unplanned pregnancy. Yet, according to the Care Net Online Resource Catalog page (where crisis pregnancy center affiliates can purchase billboards, pamphlets, posters, and other advertising items), it reads: Free For Affiliates! The Care Net billboard was designed to reach the abortion- vulnerable and has proved to be an effective means of generating calls from women facing unplanned pregnancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Learning Xix
    LIFE AND LEARNING XIX PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH UNIVERSITY FACULTY FOR LIFE CONFERENCE at THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS SCHOOL OF LAW MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 2009 edited by Joseph W. Koterski, S.J. KOTERSKI LIFE AND LEARNING XIX UFL University Faculty for Life University Faculty for Life was founded in 1989 to promote research, dialogue, and publication among faculty members who respect the value of human life from its inception to natural death, and to provide academic support for the pro-life position. Respect for life is especially endangered by the current cultural forces seeking to legitimize such practices as abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, and physician-assisted suicide. These topics are controversial, but we believe that they are too important to be resolved by the shouting, the news-bites, and the slogans that often dominate popular presentation of these issues. Because we believe that the evidence is on our side, we would like to assure a hearing for these views in the academic community. The issues of abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia have many dimensions–political, social, legal, medical, biological, psychological, ethical, and religious. Accordingly, we hope to promote an inter-disciplinary forum in which such issues can be discussed among scholars. We believe that by talking with one another we may better understand the values we share and become better informed in our expression and defense of them. We are distressed that the media often portray those favoring the value of human life as mindless zealots acting out of sectarian bias. We hope that our presence will change that image. We also believe that academicians united on these issues can encourage others to speak out for human life in their own schools and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals
    Case: 18-3329 Document: 141-2 Filed: 04/13/2021 Page: 1 RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0083p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PRETERM-CLEVELAND; PLANNED PARENTHOOD │ SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION; WOMEN’S MED GROUP │ PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; ROSLYN KADE, M.D.; │ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO, │ Plaintiffs-Appellees, > No. 18-3329 │ │ v. │ │ STEPHANIE MCCLOUD, Director, Ohio Department of │ Health; KIM G. ROTHERMEL, Secretary, State Medical │ Board of Ohio; BRUCE R. SAFERIN, Supervising │ Member, State Medical Board of Ohio, │ Defendants-Appellants. │ ┘ On Petition for Rehearing En Banc United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati; No. 1:18-cv-00109—Timothy S. Black, District Judge. Argued En Banc: March 11, 2020 Decided and Filed: April 13, 2021 Before: COLE; Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, SUTTON, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, and READLER, Circuit Judges.* _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED EN BANC: Benjamin M. Flowers, OFFICE OF THE OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellants. B. Jessie Hill, ACLU OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC., Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellees. Alexander V. Maugeri, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae. ON SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF: Benjamin M. Flowers, Stephen P. Carney, Tiffany L. Carwile, OFFICE OF THE OHIO *Judge Murphy recused himself from participation in this case. Case: 18-3329 Document: 141-2 Filed: 04/13/2021 Page: 2 No. 18-3329 Preterm-Cleveland v. McCloud Page 2 ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellants. B. Jessie Hill, Freda J. Levenson, ACLU OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC., Cleveland, Ohio, Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, New York, New York, Jennifer L.
    [Show full text]