DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Washington Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Washington Hazard Mitigation Plan TOWN OF WASHINGTON HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2014 MMI #3843-04 Prepared For: Town of Washington 2 Bryan Plaza Washington Depot, Connecticut 06794 (860) 868-2259 Prepared By: Milone & MacBroom, Inc. 99 Realty Drive Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 (203) 271-1773 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through funds provided by the Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP) Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security (DEMHS) under a grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The contents of this report reflect the views of the Town of Washington and do not necessarily reflect the official views of DEMHS. The report does not constitute a specification or regulation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & CONTACT INFORMATION This plan update was prepared under the direction of the Town of Washington. The following individual should be contacted with questions or comments regarding the plan: Mark Lyon First Selectman 2 Bryan Plaza Washington, Connecticut 06794 (860) 868-3103 [email protected] This Hazard Mitigation Plan could not have been completed without the time and dedication of the additional following individuals at the local level: Mr. Mike Ajello, Zoning Enforcement Officer Mr. RJ Rocky Tomlinson, Emergency Management Mr. Kevin Smith, Highway Department Ms. Janet Hill, Land Use Administrator The consulting firm of Milone & MacBroom, Inc. (MMI) prepared the subject plan. The following individuals at MMI may be contacted with questions or comments regarding the plan update using the contact information on the title page or the electronic mail addresses below: Mr. David Murphy, P.E., CFM Associate, Water Resources [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Hazard Mitigation Goals ............................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Identification of Hazards and Document Overview ..................................................................... 1-5 1.4 Discussion of the STAPLEE Ranking-Method ............................................................................ 1-8 1.5 Discussion of Benefit-Cost Ratio ................................................................................................ 1-10 1.6 Documentation of the Planning Process ..................................................................................... 1-10 1.7 Coordination with Neighboring Communities ............................................................................ 1-17 2.0 COMMUNITY PROFILE 2.1 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Existing Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Current Climate Conditions and Climate Change ......................................................................... 2-7 2.5 Drainage Basins and Hydrology ................................................................................................... 2-8 2.6 Population and Demographic Setting ......................................................................................... 2-11 2.7 Governmental Structure and Capabilities ................................................................................... 2-11 2.8 Development Trends ................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.9 Critical Facilities, Sheltering Capacity and Emergency Response Capabilities ......................... 2-12 3.0 FLOODING 3.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Hazard Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Historic Record ............................................................................................................................. 3-5 3.4 Existing Capabilities ..................................................................................................................... 3-7 3.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment .......................................................................................... 3-10 3.6 Potential Mitigation Strategies and Actions ................................................................................ 3-13 3.7 Summary of Mitigation Strategies and Actions .......................................................................... 3-19 4.0 HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 4.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Hazard Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Historic Record ............................................................................................................................. 4-2 4.4 Existing Capabilities ..................................................................................................................... 4-5 4.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment ............................................................................................ 4-6 4.6 Potential Mitigation Strategies and Actions ................................................................................ 4-12 4.7 Summary of Mitigation Strategies and Actions .......................................................................... 4-12 TOWN OF WASHINGTON HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WASHINGTON, CONNECTICUT DECEMBER 2014 iii 5.0 SUMMER STORMS & TORNADOES 5.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Hazard Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Historic Record ............................................................................................................................. 5-5 5.4 Existing Capabilities ..................................................................................................................... 5-7 5.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment ............................................................................................ 5-8 5.6 Potential Mitigation Strategies and Actions .................................................................................. 5-9 5.7 Summary of Mitigation Strategies and Actions .......................................................................... 5-10 6.0 WINTER STORMS 6.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Hazard Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 Historic Record ............................................................................................................................. 6-3 6.4 Existing Capabilities ..................................................................................................................... 6-8 6.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment ............................................................................................ 6-8 6.6 Potential Mitigation Strategies and Actions .................................................................................. 6-9 6.7 Summary of Mitigation Strategies and Actions .......................................................................... 6-11 7.0 EARTHQUAKES 7.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Hazard Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.3 Historic Record ............................................................................................................................. 7-2 7.4 Existing Capabilities ..................................................................................................................... 7-4 7.5 Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment ............................................................................................ 7-4 7.6 Potential Mitigation Strategies and Actions ................................................................................ 7-10 7.7 Summary of Mitigation Strategies and Actions .......................................................................... 7-10 8.0 DAM FAILURE 8.1 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Hazard Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 8-1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tyringham MA (Town Review 03-17-2021)
    Town of Tyringham Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Tyringham, Massachusetts Prepared by: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Prepared For: Local Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update The Town of Tyringham, Massachuses Prepared in accordance with the requirements presented in the FEMA Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide and the Local Mitigation Handbook March 10, 2021 Photo credit: Town of Tyringham (https://www.tyringham-ma.gov/) GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Table of Contents Quick Plan Reference Guide Understanding Natural Hazard Risk p.3 Secon 1: Introducon P.5 Secon 2: Planning Process p.8 Secon 3: Community Profile Overview p.12 Secon 4: Natural Hazard Risk Profile P.19 Secon 5: Natural Hazard Migaon Strategies P.33 Secon 6: Regional and Intercommunity Consideraons P.35 Secon 7: Plan Adopon and Implementaon Aachments: 1: Community Profile Details 2: Natural Hazards 3: Natural Hazard Risk 4: FEMA HAZUS-MH Simulaon Results 5. Potenal State and Federal Funding Sources 6: Public Review Documentaon 7: References and Resources 8: Key Contacts Town of Tyringham Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan INSERT IMAGE OF THE TOWN’S RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Tyringham Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan GZA Town of Tyringham Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan INSERT IMAGE OF FEMA’S APPROVAL LETTER Tyringham Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan GZA Town of Tyringham Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan QUICK PLAN REFERENCE GUIDE The following provides a Quick Reference Guide to the Town of Tyringham Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Update: STEP 1: UNDERSTAND THE PLANNING PROCESS Section 2 - Planning Process describes the planning process and identifies the members of the Local Planning Team (LPT) that participated in the Plan develop- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeowners Handbook to Prepare for Natural Disasters
    HOMEOWNERS HANDBOOK HANDBOOK HOMEOWNERS DELAWARE HOMEOWNERS TO PREPARE FOR FOR TO PREPARE HANDBOOK TO PREPARE FOR NATURAL HAZARDSNATURAL NATURAL HAZARDS TORNADOES COASTAL STORMS SECOND EDITION SECOND Delaware Sea Grant Delaware FLOODS 50% FPO 15-0319-579-5k ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This handbook was developed as a cooperative project among the Delaware Emergency Management Agency (DEMA), the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) and the Delaware Sea Grant College Program (DESG). A key priority of this project partnership is to increase the resiliency of coastal communities to natural hazards. One major component of strong communities is enhancing individual resilience and recognizing that adjustments to day-to- day living are necessary. This book is designed to promote individual resilience, thereby creating a fortified community. The second edition of the handbook would not have been possible without the support of the following individuals who lent their valuable input and review: Mike Powell, Jennifer Pongratz, Ashley Norton, David Warga, Jesse Hayden (DNREC); Damaris Slawik (DEMA); Darrin Gordon, Austin Calaman (Lewes Board of Public Works); John Apple (Town of Bethany Beach Code Enforcement); Henry Baynum, Robin Davis (City of Lewes Building Department); John Callahan, Tina Callahan, Kevin Brinson (University of Delaware); David Christopher (Delaware Sea Grant); Kevin McLaughlin (KMD Design Inc.); Mark Jolly-Van Bodegraven, Pam Donnelly and Tammy Beeson (DESG Environmental Public Education Office). Original content from the first edition of the handbook was drafted with assistance from: Mike Powell, Greg Williams, Kim McKenna, Jennifer Wheatley, Tony Pratt, Jennifer de Mooy and Morgan Ellis (DNREC); Ed Strouse, Dave Carlson, and Don Knox (DEMA); Joe Thomas (Sussex County Emergency Operations Center); Colin Faulkner (Kent County Department of Public Safety); Dave Carpenter, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Storm Preparedness
    Eleven Days after Hurricane Carol slammed the Island in August 1964, Hurricane Edna struck on September 11, flooding Edgartown (Vineyard Gazette Archive) Guidelines for Storm Preparedness West Tisbury Climate Action Committee May 2020 May 3-9, 2020: Hurricane Preparedness Week National Weather Service 1 of 11 Storm Preparedness It should come as no surprise that Martha’s Vineyard is vulnerable Nor’easter storms formed over the cold Atlantic between September and April; and hurricanes formed over warm tropical waters from June to November. The absence of hurricanes in recent years have lulled some into thinking they are no longer a serious threat to the Vineyard. The truth is that storms and hurricanes will lash the Vineyard, flooding low-lying portions of our villages, uprooting trees, bringing down power lines, snatching boats from their moorings, and disruption ferry service to the mainland. It is not a question of if; it is a matter of when and with what degree of severity. What is equally sure is that with a modicum of preparedness, your chances of riding out a storm and coping with the inevitable disruptions in the aftermath — the loss of power, telephone and internet connections, and delayed resupplying from the mainland — increase substantially. This manual breaks down emergency preparedness into stages; What you can do immediately without a storm in sight. What you can do when you know a storm is on its way. And, what you can do to make your surroundings as safe as possible when the storm hits. Storm risk varies by the size and path of the storm and by the population of the Vineyard.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Greensburg Supercell of 4 May 2007 Anatomy of a Severe Local ‘Superstorm’
    Historic Greensburg Supercell of 4 May 2007 Anatomy of a Severe Local ‘Superstorm’ Mike Umscheid National Weather Service Forecast Office – Dodge City, KS In collaboration with Leslie R. Lemon University of Oklahoma/CIMMS, NOAA/NWS Warning Decision Training Branch, Norman, OK DuPage County, IL Advanced Severe Weather Seminar March 5-6, 2010 1 © Martin Kucera A Thunderstorm Spectrum Single Cell Multi-cell Multi-cell Supercell (cluster) (line) Short-lived, Longer-lived (2-4hrs), non-tornadic supercells one or two tornadic cycles Courtesy NWS Norman Severe Local “Superstorm” 6+ hrs, 2-3 significant tornadoes (or one ultra long-lived sig tor), Many other smaller ones. Widespread destruction. 9 April 1947 Woodward, OK 2 Woodward – Udall – Greensburg Udall Woodward 10:35 pm 8:42 pm ~ ¾ to 1 mile wide 82 fatalities 1.8 miles wide 107 fatalities Photos courtesy NWS ICT, NW OK Genealogical Society, Mike Theiss Times CST 11 fatalities 1.7 miles wide 8:50 pm Greensburg 3 Integrated Warning System 4 A little preview… EF5 EF3 (+) 0237 0331 EF3 (+) EF3 0347 0437 1 supercell thunderstorm – 20 tornadoes, 4 massive tornadoes spanning 5 3 hours w/ no break, farm community obliterated, very well-documented by chasers “The Big 4” Rating: EF3 (strong) Duration: 65 min. Length: 23.5 mi Mean Width: 1.5 mi St. John Max Width: 2.2 mi Macksville Damage Area: 35.4 mi2 (A5) Rating: EF3 Damage $$: 1.5 M Duration: 24 min. Length: 17.4 mi Mean Width: 0.6 mi Max Width: 0.9 mi Trousdale Damage Area: 9.7 mi2 (A4) Hopewell Fatalities: 1 Rating: EF5 Duration: 65 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Killingworth, Connecticut Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan
    Killingworth, Connecticut Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Prepared for: Killingworth Board of Selectmen Adopted by: Town of Killingworth, Connecticut ______, 2013 Prepared by: Lower Connecticut River Valley Council of Governments 145 Dennison Rd. Essex, CT 06426 (860) 581-8554 www.rivercog.org Killingworth, CT On the Cover Photo 1: Road Washout on Route 80 after 1982 Flooding Source: Middletown Press Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan 2 Killingworth, CT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PLANNING PROCESS 7 A. Authority (ELEMENT C) 7 B. Purpose & Benefits (ELEMENT 7 C. Plan Development (ELEMENTS A & D) 7 1. Funding & Technical Assistance (F) 8 2. Plan Preparation (A.1 & D.2) 9 3. Agency Comment (A.2) 9 4. Public Involvement (A.3) 10 5. Incorporation of Existing Resource Materials (A.4) 10 D. Plan Adoption (ELEMENT E) 11 E. Plan Implementation (ELEMENT D) 11 1. Priorities 11 2. Responsibilities 11 3. Resources (C.6) 11 F. Plan Maintenance (ELEMENT A) 13 1. Maintenance Method (A.5) 13 2. Maintenance Update Schedule (A.6) 14 Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan 3 Killingworth, CT II. RISK ASSESSMENT & HAZARD IDENTIFICATION 17 A. The Town & the Vulnerability of its Resources (ELEMENT B) 17 1. Geography and Land Use Patterns 17 2. Demographics and Critical Facilities 19 3. Economics and Cultural Resources 25 4. The Environment and Ecological Resources 26 B. Natural Hazards (ELEMENTS B & C) 29 1. Flooding (B.1, B.2, B.3, B.4 and C.2) 32 2. Dam Failure (B.1, B.2, B.3, B.4 and C.2) 41 3. High Wind & Tornado (B.1, B.2, B.3, B.4 and C.3) 45 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: the EFFECT of HURRICANE SANDY
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE EFFECT OF HURRICANE SANDY ON NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COASTAL MARSHES EVALUATED WITH SATELLITE IMAGERY Diana Marie Roman, Master of Science, August 2015 Directed By: Professor, Michael S. Kearney, Environmental Science and Technology Hurricane Sandy, one of several large extratropical hurricanes to impact New Jersey since 1900, produced some of the most extensive coastal destruction within the last fifty years. Though the damage to barrier islands from Sandy was well-documented, the effect of Sandy on the New Jersey coastal marshes has not. The objective of this analysis, based on twenty-three Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data sets collected between 1984 and 2011 and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images collected between 2013 and 2014 was to determine the effect of Hurricane Sandy on the New Jersey Atlantic coastal marshes. Image processing was performed using ENVI image analysis software with the NDX model (Rogers and Kearney, 2004). Results support the conclusion that the marshes were stable between 1984 and 2006, but had decreased in vegetation density coverage since 2007. Hurricane Sandy caused the greatest damage to low-lying marshes located close to where landfall occurred. THE EFFECT OF HURRICANE SANDY ON NEW JERSEY ATLANTIC COASTAL MARSHES EVALUATED WITH SATELLITE IMAGERY by Diana Marie Roman Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science 2015 Advisory Committee: Professor Michael Kearney, Chair Professor Andrew Baldwin Associate Professor Andrew Elmore © Copyright by Diana Marie Roman 2015 Forward Hurricane storm impacts on coastal salt marshes have increased over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Meeting Program Agenda (Preliminary Updated 8 October 2014)
    2014 Annual Meeting Program Agenda (Preliminary updated 8 October 2014) National Weather Association 39th Annual Meeting Sheraton Hotel, Salt Lake City, UT October 18-23, 2014 Theme: "Building a 21st Century Weather Enterprise: Facilitating Research to Operations – Optimizing Communication and Response." See the main annual meeting page http://www.nwas.org/meetings/nwa2014/ for information on the meeting hotel, exhibits, sponsorships, attendee registration requirements, social media connections and more. Authors/Presenters, please inform the Annual Meeting Program Committee at [email protected] of any corrections or changes required in the listing of your presentations or abstracts as soon as possible. Instructions for uploading your presentation PowerPoint slides, extended abstracts and posters to the NWA website to be used at the meeting and eventually linked from the final agenda are shown on the "Presentation Instructions and Tips" website page. See "Upload Instructions" then send your file(s) on the Presentation and Extended Abstract Upload website page. All activities will be held in the Sheraton Salt Lake City Hotel unless otherwise noted. All attendees please check in at the NWA Registration and Information Desk as soon as possible upon arriving at the Sheraton Hotel to obtain nametags, the latest program and scheduling information and to register if not preregistered. Please note that this is a preliminary agenda and that changes will occur to the program prior to the meeting. Please check back regularly for any modifications that may impact presentation title, time, room, etc. 1 Saturday – 18 October 10:00 AM Aviation Weather Safety Seminar: Aviation Weather in the Intermountain West The NWA Aviation Meteorology Committee invites all to attend this free valuable seminar (10 AM -1PM) specifically designed for pilots who fly in the Intermountain West.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 New York Hazard Mitigation Plan Hurricane Section 3.12: HURRICANE (Tropical/ Coastal Storms/ Nor’Easter)
    2014 New York Hazard Mitigation Plan Hurricane Section 3.12: HURRICANE (Tropical/ Coastal Storms/ Nor’easter) 2014 SHMP Update Reformatted 2011 Mitigation Plan into 2014 Update outline Added Tropical Storms, Coastal Storms, & Nor’easter hazards to Hurricane Profile Added new key terms to 2011 Mitigation Plan’s list of terms Updated past hurricane occurrences section Inserted Events and Losses table Inserted new Hurricane Events and Property Losses maps Added information on New York Bight Added active State development projects 3.12.1 Hurricane (Tropical/ Coastal Storms/ Nor’easters) Profile Coastal storms, including Nor’easters, tropical storms, and hurricanes can, either directly or indirectly, impact all of New York State. More densely populated and developed coastal areas, such as New York City, are the most vulnerable to hurricane-related damages. Before a storm is classified a hurricane, it must pass through four distinct stages: tropical disturbance, tropical depression, tropical storm and lastly a hurricane. Figure 3.12a: Four Stages of a Hurricane Tropical Disturbance (Stage 1) Tropical Hurricane Depression (Stage 4) (Stage 2) Tropical Storm (Stage 3) 3.12-1 Final Release Date January 4, 2014 2014 New York Hazard Mitigation Plan Hurricane Characteristics Below are some key terms to review relating to hurricanes, tropical storms, coastal storms and nor’easters: Hazard Key Terms and Definition Nor’easter- An intense storm that can cause heavy rain and snow, strong winds, and coastal flooding. Nor’easters have cold, low barometric
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2016 Volume 28 Number 4
    The Habitat A newsletter of the Connecticut Association of Conservation & Inland Wetlands Commissions, Inc. Fall 2016 volume 28 number 4 CACIWC’s 39th Annual Meeting & Environmental Conference Saturday, November 12, 2016 New Venue, New Workshops and Networking Opportunities! ACIWC will host an exciting legislative panel biology and habitat management, legal and regulatory discussion during the 2016 Annual Meeting updates & issues, climate adaptation & water Cand Environmental Conference. The panel management, and resource conservation, planning consists of key legislative leaders who will discuss and development. Individual workshops will focus expectations for the upcoming legislative session, on invasive plant and animal species, wetlands case including the ongoing efforts to enact a state consti- law and regulation, vernal pool biology, conducting tutional amendment designed to permanently protect natural resource inventories, climate resiliency state parks and forests. The panel discussion will take update, improving stormwater management, place during the luncheon session. promoting local recycling efforts, and promoting cluster housing as a conservation tool. (See pages 8-9). Our keynote speaker panel includes State Representative James M. Albis (99th House Our new conference venue will also host a revised District), State Senator Ted M. Kennedy, Jr. layout of new and informative displays in an arrange- (12th Senate District), and State Representative ment that will promote open discussions and net- Mary M. Mushinsky (85th House District). This working opportunities among our members and other distinguished panel will also discuss how our member conference attendees. commissions can plan for more ecologically resilient communities, as we prepare for short- and long-term Watch for additional conference news and information changes to Connecticut habitats that may come about on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Releases
    About Us > Press Releases FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 6, 2012 CONTACT: Marc La Vorgna / Lauren Passalacqua (Mayor's Office) - (212) 788-2958 Rachaele Raynoff (City Planning) - (212) 720-3471 MAYOR BLOOMBERG DELIVERS ADDRESS ON SHAPING NEW YORK CITY’S FUTURE AFTER HURRICANE SANDY The following are Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s remarks as delivered this morning at the New York Marriott Downtown: “Well good morning, everyone. Mr. Vice President, thank you. Your leadership and vision has helped inspire action on climate change, not just here in the United States, but by cities and countries and consumers around the world. “No one, I think, has done more to raise the public consciousness of this issue or to press for change on an international stage. And I want to thank you for coming here and lending your voice to our efforts to prepare New York City for the new realities that we face. “I do remember when we were up on a roof. For those of you that don’t realize what we’re talking about, if you paint your roofs white it reflects the sun, and in a five-story building it reduces the total energy needs of that building – because in the summer it costs a lot to air condition – by something like a quarter. “It is an amazing thing, and the next time you take off from LaGuardia or from Kennedy, if you get lucky and the plane banks over New York City you’ll be shocked at the percentage of roofs that today are white. It’s got to be something north of 80 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Amendment to the Restoration Plan
    Final Amendment to the Housatonic River Basin Final Natural Resources Restoration Plan, Environmental Assessment, and Environmental Impact Evaluation for Connecticut May 2013 State of Connecticut, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 7 2.1 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Proposed Preferred Alternative ............................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Power Line Marsh Restoration ...................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Long Beach West Tidal Marsh Restoration ................................................................. 10 2.2.3 Pin Shop Pond Dam Removal...................................................................................... 12 2.2.4 Old Papermill Pond Dam Removal Feasibility Study ................................................. 15 2.2.5 Housatonic Watershed Habitat Continuity in Northwest Connecticut ........................ 18 2.2.6 Tingue Dam Fish Passage ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]