World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document Public Disclosure Authorized PRIORITIES Priorities in Health in Health Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Editors Dean T. Jamison Joel G. Breman Anthony R. Measham George Alleyne Mariam Claeson David B. Evans Prabhat Jha Anne Mills Philip Musgrove Disease Control Priorities Project Public Disclosure Authorized Priorities in Health Advisory Committee to the Editors J. R. Aluoch Christopher Lovelace Jacques Baudouy Anthony Mbewu Fred Binka Rajiv Misra Mayra Buvini´c Perla Santos Ocampo David Challoner G. B. A. Okelo Guy de Thé Sevket Ruacan Timothy Evans Pramilla Senanayake Richard Horton Jaime Sepúlveda Sharon Hrynkow Chitr Sitthi-amorn Gerald Keusch Sally Stansfield Kiyoshi Kurokawa Misael Uribe Peter Lachmann Zhengguo Wang Mary Ann Lansang Witold Zatonski Contributing Writers William D. Savedoff and Anne-Marie Smith, Social Insight Priorities in Health Editors Dean T. Jamison Joel G. Breman Anthony R. Measham George Alleyne Mariam Claeson David B. Evans Prabhat Jha Anne Mills Philip Musgrove THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. ©2006 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved 123409080706 This volume was funded in part by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Founda- tion and is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, the World Health Organization, and the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health. The findings, interpreta- tions, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent, the World Health Organization, or the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health. The World Bank, the World Health Organization, and the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank, the World Health Organization, or the Fogarty Interna- tional Center of the National Institutes of Health concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting por- tions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422; e-mail:pubrights@worldbank. org. ISBN-10: 0-8213-6260-7 ISBN-13: 978-0-8213-6260-0 eISBN: 978-0-8213-6261-7 DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6260-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data has been applied for. Contents Foreword by Rajiv Misra vii Acknowledgments xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms xvii 1. Accomplishments, Challenges, and Priorities 1 Historical Achievements in World Health 2 Accounting for Health Gains 5 Health and Economic Growth 7 Equity 8 An Agenda for Action 13 Putting DCP2 to Use 16 This Volume 20 2. Success in Addressing Priorities 23 Successes despite Weak Health Systems 27 Successes That Strengthened Weak Health Systems 28 Cost-Effective Interventions Aimed at Building Health Systems 31 Cost-Effective Interventions That Furthered Existing Health Systems 33 Cost-Effective Interventions beyond Health Systems 34 Conclusion 36 3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 39 Why Use Cost-Effectiveness Analysis? 39 What Is Cost-Effectiveness Analysis? 42 How Reliable Is Cost-Effectiveness Analysis? 48 What Are Appropriate Tasks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis? 50 How Can Policy Makers Use Cost-Effectiveness Analysis? 52 Summary for Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Properly 56 v 4. Cost-Effective Strategies for the Excess Burden of Disease in Developing Countries 59 Infectious and Communicable Diseases 60 Maternal and Neonatal Health 82 5. Cost-Effective Strategies for Noncommunicable Diseases, Risk Factors, and Behaviors 97 Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, High Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, and Bodyweight 98 Cancer 104 Congenital and Developmental Disorders 106 Unintentional Injuries 110 Tobacco Use 112 Alcohol Abuse 120 Mental Health 124 Conclusion 126 6. Providing Interventions 129 Levels of Care 130 Cross-Level Services and Inputs 139 Integration of Services across the Life Cycle 149 7. Pillars of the Health System 155 Information, Surveillance, and Research 155 Management of Health Services 164 Human Resources 168 Financing 173 8. The Way Forward: A Blueprint for Action 179 References 183 About the Editors 187 Advisory Committee to the Editors 195 Contributing Writers 196 Table of Contents, Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries, 2nd Edition 197 Table of Contents, Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors 205 Index 207 Photo Credits 217 vi | Contents Foreword Priorities in Health is the companion volume to the second edition of Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries (DCP2), a successor to the first edition (DCP1) published in 1993, but with a vastly expanded mandate. DCP1 proved to be a highly influential document in shaping health policies globally. The World Bank’s (1993) path- breaking publication World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health, which incorporated DCP1’s main concepts and messages, became the standard reference for health policy makers worldwide and even today continues to enjoy that status. In India, the impact was dramatic, and I was greatly privileged to be in a position to manage and oversee the transition to greatly improved implementation of public health interventions in terms of both cover- age and effectiveness. A serendipitous set of circumstances facilitated this, namely: an unprecedented fiscal and balance of payments crisis that compelled India to seek structural adjustment lending from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and resulted in severe fiscal compression; a shift in World Bank lending policies whereby the International Development Association was to emphasize social sectors; a paucity of health and education projects in the pipeline to use the highly concessional International Development Association allocation at a time when India was experiencing a severe foreign exchange crunch; and finally, an extraordinarily sympathetic and sup- portive team at the World Bank’s India desk. We became aware of DCP1’s main concepts well before its publica- tion by means of a seminar at Delhi’s All India Institute of Medical Sciences in early 1992, at which Dean Jamison and his colleagues pre- sented the main findings of DCP1 and the World Development Report 1993, including the concepts of disability-adjusted life years, burden of vii disease, epidemiological transition, and cost-effectiveness analysis as a tool for priority setting. These concepts provided a completely new way of determining priorities objectively based on evidence and eco- nomic analysis. Despite some initial and understandable skepticism about the methodologies and the estimates, the overall response was highly favorable. At the same time, the World Bank was looking for objective criteria for identifying projects in the health sector. A commonality of ap- proach developed between the World Bank and the Ministry of Health to use DCP1 techniques, which led to the revamping and scaling up of all major disease control projects in record time—particularly those against leprosy, blindness, tuberculosis, and malaria—in addition to new initiatives for dealing with the emerging threat of HIV/AIDS. Simultaneously, projects for system strengthening were also under- taken in several states to improve capacity. As a result, the develop- mental outlays for the Department of Health rose more than 5-fold and the external component rose more than 25-fold between 1990–1 and 2001–2 (India Health Report 2003), which not only increased available financial resources beyond anyone’s expectations, but also completely changed how projects were formulated and implemented. This is a success story of which both the Indian government and the World Bank can legitimately be proud, that is, the contribution of DCP1 to channeling additional resources to cost-effective interven- tions to deal with the conditions responsible for a major share of the burden of disease. COVERING NEW GROUND DCP2 is a much more comprehensive, and indeed ambitious, effort. It goes well beyond updating the technical content, burden of disease, and cost-effectiveness estimates of DCP1. It covers new ground by ex- amining important, complex areas, such as the delivery, management, and financing of health care and health research. It clearly recognizes that objective priority setting is only the first step: identified interven- tions have to be delivered to the targeted population efficiently to de- rive the full benefits
Recommended publications
  • Cost, Affordability and Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies To
    BMC Public Health BioMed Central Research article Open Access Cost, affordability and cost-effectiveness of strategies to control tuberculosis in countries with high HIV prevalence Christine SM Currie1, Katherine Floyd*2, Brian G Williams2 and Christopher Dye2 Address: 1School of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK and 2HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria cluster, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland Email: Christine SM Currie - [email protected]; Katherine Floyd* - [email protected]; Brian G Williams - [email protected]; Christopher Dye - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 12 December 2005 Received: 07 April 2005 Accepted: 12 December 2005 BMC Public Health 2005, 5:130 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-130 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/130 © 2005 Currie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The HIV epidemic has caused a dramatic increase in tuberculosis (TB) in East and southern Africa. Several strategies have the potential to reduce the burden of TB in high HIV prevalence settings, and cost and cost-effectiveness analyses can help to prioritize them when budget constraints exist. However, published cost and cost-effectiveness studies are limited. Methods: Our objective was to compare the cost, affordability and cost-effectiveness of seven strategies for reducing the burden of TB in countries with high HIV prevalence.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment & Lineage Dynamics of the SARS-Cov-2 Epidemic in the UK
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.23.20218446; this version posted October 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Establishment & lineage dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the UK Louis du Plessis†1, John T. McCrone†2, Alexander E. Zarebski†1, Verity Hill†2, Christopher Ruis†3,4, Bernardo Gutierrez1,5, Jayna Raghwani1, Jordan Ashworth2, Rachel Colquhoun2, Thomas R. Connor6,7, Nuno R. Faria1,8, Ben Jackson2, Nicholas J. Loman9, Áine O’Toole2, Samuel M. Nicholls9, Kris V. Parag8, Emily Scher2, Tetyana I. Vasylyeva1, Erik M. Volz8, Alexander Watts12,13, Isaac I. Bogoch10,11, Kamran Khan10,12,13, the COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium+,14, David M. Aanensen15,16, Moritz U. G. Kraemer‡1, Andrew Rambaut*‡2, Oliver G. Pybus*‡1,17 1 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2 Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 3 Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 4 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 5 School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador. 6 School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, UK. 7 Pathogen Genomics Unit, Public Health Wales NHS Trust, UK. 8 MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, J-IDEA, Imperial College London, UK. 9 Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Tuberculosis
    WHO/CDS/TB/2000.278 Anti-tuberculosis Drug Resistance in the World Anti-tuberculosis Communicable Diseases SURVEILLANCE GLOBALPROJECT ON ANTI-TUBERCULOSIS DRUG RESISTANCE THE WHO/IUATLD WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ANTI-TUBERCULOSIS 20, avenue Appia CH-1211 Geneva 27 SWITZERLAND Telephone 41 22 791 2708 Facsimile 41 22 791 4268 Report No.2 Prevalence and Trends Prevalence and Trends Report No.2 THE WHO/IUATLD GLOBAL PROJECT ON ANTI-TUBERCULOSIS DRUG RESISTANCE SURVEILLANCE COMMUNICABLE DISEASES WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION WHO/CDS/TB/2000.278 Distr.: General Original: English ANTI-TUBERCULOSIS DRUG RESISTANCE IN THE WORLD Report No. 2 Prevalence and Trends The WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Anti-tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance Communicable Diseases World Health Organization Geneva 2000 © World Health Organization, 2000 This document is not a formal publication of the World Health Organization (WHO), and all rights are reserved by the Organization. The document may, however, be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced or translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale nor for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The views expressed in documents by named authors are solely the responsibility of those au- thors. WRITING COMMITTEE • Marcos A. Espinal, M.D., Dr.P.H., M.P.H., Communicable Diseases Surveillance & Response and Communicable Diseases Control, Prevention & Eradication, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland; • Lone Simonsen, Ph.D., Communicable Diseases Surveillance & Response, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland; • Adalbert Laszlo, Ph.D., Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Canada; International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUATLD); • Fadila Boulahbal, Ph.D., Institut Pasteur, Alger, Algeria; • Sang Jae Kim, Sc.D., Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Seoul, Republic of Korea; • Ana Reniero, Ph.D., Instituto Panamericano de Protección de Alimentos y Zoonosis, Buenos Aires, Argentina; • Sven Hoffner, Ph.D., Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm, Sweden; • Hans L.
    [Show full text]
  • 80 Questions for UK Biological Security
    80 questions for UK biological security Kemp, L., Aldridge, D. C., Booy, O., Bower, H., Browne, D., Burgmann, M., Burt, A., Cunningham, A. A., Dando, M., Dick, J. T. A., Dye, C., Evans, S. W., Gallardo, B., Godfray, C. H. J., Goodfellow, I., Gubbins, S., Holt, L. A., Jones, K. E., Kandil, H., ... Sutherland, W. J. (2021). 80 questions for UK biological security. PLoS ONE, 16(1 ), [e0241190]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241190 Published in: PLoS ONE Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2021 the authors. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries SECOND EDITION
    Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries SECOND EDITION Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries SECOND EDITION Editors Dean T. Jamison Joel G. Breman Anthony R. Measham George Alleyne Mariam Claeson David B. Evans Prabhat Jha Anne Mills Philip Musgrove A copublication of Oxford University Press and The World Bank ©2006 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 09 08 07 06 A copublication of The World Bank and Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press 165 Madison Avenue New York NY 10016 This volume was funded in part by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / the World Bank, the World Health Organization, and the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health. The findings, inter- pretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the executive direc- tors of the World Bank or the governments they represent, the World Health Organization, or the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health. The World Bank, the World Health Organization, and the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of the World Bank, the World Health Organization, or the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Res Medica, Volume 21, Issue 1 Page 1 of 11 SPECIAL ARTICLE The World Health Report 1995-2013: A personal retrospective Thomson Prentice Former Managing Editor World Health Organization Correspondence email: [email protected] Abstract Thomson Prentice shares his personal experiences of being part of the World Health Reports (WHR) from 1995-2013. Copyright Royal Medical Society. All rights reserved. The copyright is retained by the author and the Royal Medical Society, except where explicitly otherwise stated. Scans have been produced by the Digital Imaging Unit at Edinburgh University Library. Res Medica is supported by the University of Edinburgh’s Journal Hosting Service: http://journals.ed.ac.uk ISSN: 2051-7580 (Online) ISSN: 0482-3206 (Print) Res Medica is published by the Royal Medical Society, 5/5 Bristo Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9AL Res Medica, 2013, 21(1):2-11 doi: 10.2218/resmedica.v21i1.510 Prentice, T. The World Health Report 1995-2013: A personal retrospective. Res Medica 2013, 21(1), pp.2-11 doi:10.2218/resmedica.v21i1.510 Prentice T. http://journals.ed.ac.uk/resmedica Introduction In my experience, I can say that every report SPECIAL The launch of The World Health Report has been a unique exercise, invariably (WHR) 2013 in Beijing in September of this complex, involving many people in WHO year brought the total of such reports to 16 HQ, Regional Offices and elsewhere, and since the World Health Organization many individual contributors. The work usually spanned about 12 months. Often (WHO) brought out the first edition in 1995.1 During that time the WHR has that seemed barely long enough for some of become WHO’s flagship publication and an us, and far too long for others.
    [Show full text]
  • Membership of Sectional Committees 2015
    Membership of Sectional Committees 2015 The main responsibility of the Sectional Committees is to select a short list of candidates for consideration by Council for election to the Fellowship. The Committees meet twice a year, in January and March. SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 1 [1963] SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 3 [1963] Mathematics Chemistry Chair: Professor Keith Ball Chair: Professor Anthony Stace Members: Members: Professor Philip Candelas Professor Varinder Aggarwal Professor Ben Green Professor Harry Anderson Professor John Hinch Professor Steven Armes Professor Christopher Hull Professor Paul Attfield Professor Richard Kerswell Professor Shankar Balasubramanian Professor Chandrashekhar Khare Professor Philip Bartlett Professor Steffen Lauritzen Professor Geoffrey Cloke Professor David MacKay Professor Peter Edwards Professor Robert MacKay Professor Malcolm Levitt Professor James McKernan Professor John Maier Professor Michael Paterson Professor Stephen Mann Professor Mary Rees Professor David Manolopoulos Professor John Toland Professor Paul O’Brien Professor Srinivasa Varadhan Professor David Parker Professor Alex Wilkie Professor Stephen Withers SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 2 [1963] SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 4 [1990] Astronomy and physics Engineering Chair: Professor Simon White Chair: Professor Hywel Thomas Members: Members: Professor Girish Agarwal Professor Ross Anderson Professor Michael Coey Professor Alan Bundy Professor Jack Connor Professor Michael Burdekin Professor Laurence Eaves Professor Russell Cowburn Professor Nigel Glover Professor John Crowcroft
    [Show full text]
  • The Scale and Dynamics of COVID-19 Epidemics Across Europe
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.26.20131144; this version posted August 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The scale and dynamics of COVID-19 epidemics across Europe Authors: Christopher Dye,1 Russell C.H. Cheng,2 John S. Dagpunar2 & Brian G. Williams3 5 Affiliations: 1. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom 2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom 10 3. South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, South Africa. * Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract: 15 The number of COVID-19 deaths reported from European countries has varied more than 100-fold. In terms of coronavirus transmission, the relatively low death rates in some countries could be due to low intrinsic (e.g. low population density) or imposed contact rates (e.g. non-pharmaceutical interventions) among individuals, or because fewer people 20 were exposed or susceptible to infection (e.g. smaller populations). Here we develop a flexible empirical model (skew-logistic) to distinguish among these possibilities. We find that countries reporting fewer deaths did not generally have intrinsically lower rates of transmission and epidemic growth, and flatter epidemic curves. Rather, countries with fewer deaths locked down earlier, had shorter epidemics that peaked sooner, and smaller 25 populations. Consequently, as lockdowns are eased we expect, and are starting to see, a resurgence of COVID-19 across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neglected Dimension of Global Security a Framework to Counter Infectious Disease Crises
    The Neglected Dimension of Global Security A Framework to Counter Infectious Disease Crises www.nam.edu/GHRF PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS NOTICE: Statements, recommendations, and opinions expressed are those of the Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future (GHRF Commission). The National Academy of Medicine served as Secretariat for the GHRF Commission, with support from the following National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine staff: Carmen C. Mundaca-Shah, Project Director V. Ayano Ogawa, Research Associate Priyanka Kanal, Intern (until July 2015) David Garrison, Senior Program Assistant (from December 2015) Mariah Geiger, Senior Program Assistant (until December 2015) Faye Hillman, Financial Officer Patrick W. Kelley, Director, Board on Global Health Consultants Anas El-Turabi, Doctoral Candidate in Health Policy (Evaluative Science & Statistics), Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University Philip Saynisch, Doctoral Candidate in Health Policy, Harvard Business School and Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University Sponsors The Commission was supported by the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Mr. Ming Wai Lau, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United States Agency for International Development, and Wellcome Trust. Copyright 2016 by the Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future. Suggested citation: GHRF Commission (Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework
    [Show full text]
  • Membership of Sectional Committees 2014
    Membership of Sectional Committees 2014 The main responsibility of the Sectional Committees is to select a short list of candidates for consideration by Council for election to the Fellowship. The Committees meet twice a year, in January and March. SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 1 [1963] SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 3 [1963] Mathematics Chemistry Chair: Professor Peter McCullagh Chair: Professor Anthony Stace Members: Members: Professor Keith Ball Professor Varinder Aggarwal Professor Philip Candelas Professor Shankar Balasubramanian Professor Michael Duff Professor Philip Bartlett Professor Georg Gottlob Professor Peter Bruce Professor Ben Green Professor Eleanor Campbell Professor Richard Kerswell Professor Geoffrey Cloke Professor Robert MacKay Professor Peter Edwards Professor James McKernan Professor Craig Hawker Professor Michael Paterson Professor Philip Kocienski Professor Mary Rees Professor Malcolm Levitt Professor Andrew Soward Professor David Manolopoulos Professor John Toland Professor Paul O’Brien Professor Srinivasa Varadhan Professor David Parker Professor Alex Wilkie Professor Ezio Rizzardo Professor Trevor Wooley Professor Stephen Withers SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 2 [1963] SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 4 [1990] Astronomy and physics Engineering Chair: Professor Simon White Chair: Professor Keith Bowen Members: Members: Professor Gabriel Aeppli Professor Ross Anderson Professor Girish Agarwal Professor Alan Bundy Professor Michael Coey Professor John Burland Professor Jack Connor Professor Russell Cowburn Professor Stan Cowley Dame Ann Dowling Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Foucault Ronald C Kessler Graham Colditz Sigmund Freud
    ANK RESEARCHER ORGANIZATION 1 Michel Foucault Collège de France 2 Ronald C Kessler Harvard University 3 Graham Colditz Washington University in St Louis 4 Sigmund Freud University of Vienna Brigham and Women's Hospital 5 JoAnn E Manson Harvard Medical School 6 Shizuo Akira Osaka University Centre de Sociologie Européenne; 7 Pierre Bourdieu Collège de France Massachusetts Institute of Technology 8 Robert Langer MIT 9 Eric Lander Broad Institute Harvard MIT 10 Bert Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University Brigham and Women's Hospital 11 Eugene Braunwald Harvard Medical School Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de 12 Michael Graetzel Lausanne 13 Frank B Hu Harvard University 14 Yi Hwa Liu Yale University 15 M A Caligiuri City of Hope National Medical Center 16 Gordon Guyatt McMaster University 17 Salim Yusuf McMaster University 18 Michael Karin University of California San Diego Yale University; Howard Hughes 19 Richard A Flavell Medical Institute 20 T W Robbins University of Cambridge 21 Zhong Lin Wang Georgia Institute of Technology 22 Martín Heidegger Universität Freiburg 23 Paul M Ridker Harvard Medical School 24 Daniel Levy National Institutes of Health NIH 25 Guido Kroemer INSERM 26 Steven A Rosenberg National Institutes of Health NIH Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry; 27 Matthias Mann University of Copenhagen 28 Karl Friston University College London Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Duke 29 Robert J Lefkowitz University 30 Douglas G Altman Oxford University 31 Eric Topol Scripps Research Institute 32 Michael Rutter King's College London 33
    [Show full text]
  • From Socio-Virulence Dynamics to HIV Interventions in MSM Populations
    Challenges in epidemiological modelling: from socio-virulence dynamics to HIV interventions in MSM populations. by Joe Pharaon A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Mathematics Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2020 c Joe Pharaon 2020 Examining Committee Membership The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. External Examiner: Junling Ma Professor, Mathematics & Statistics, University of Victoria Victoria, British Columbia Supervisor: Chris Bauch Professor, Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario Internal Member: Matthew Scott Associate Professor, Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario Kevin G. Lamb Professor, Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario Internal-External Member: Eihab Abdel-Rahman Professor, Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario ii Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract The spread of infectious diseases is one of the biggest challenges that public health faces nowadays. Their control is often not an easy task. Social behaviour plays an important role in disease prevention. However, the complex interplay between social behaviour and transmission dynamics is still not very well understood. This thesis tackles this topic by introducing a dynamic variable representing social behaviour that is coupled with epidemi- ological compartmental models. Under certain conditions, social behaviour can greatly impact the outcomes of an emerging virulent pathogen and thus it is necessary to explic- itly model social behaviour for better understanding of transmission dynamics, and better and more accurate predictions.
    [Show full text]