DOCSLIB.ORG

Numi/MINOS Status

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Numi/MINOS Status Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett 12 October, 2006 The NuMI/MINOS Experimental Program Status and Ongoing Prospects Robert Plunkett Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL, USA Presentation to HEPAP 12 October 2006 Presentation to HEPAP ν R. Plunkett Neutrino physics with µ beams 12 October, 2006 Studies of oscillations of ν µ →ντ at atmospheric scale = 4 θ 2 θ 2 ∆ Pν µ →ντ cos 13 sin 2 23 sin ( 13) Search for and utilize 2 ν µ →ν ∆ = ∆ at atmospheric scale e 13 1.27 m13 L/ Eν ∆2 2 2 13 2 Pν →ν = sin θ sin 2θ sin (∆ aL) µ e 23 13 ∆ 2 13 m ( 13 m aL) Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett MINOS Long-Baseline Experiment 12 October, 2006 Study the νµ→ντ oscillation hypothesis, by ∆ 2 2 θ measuring precisely | m 32| and sin 2 23 ν ν Search for µ→ e oscillations Constrain contributions of exotic phenomena e.g Sterile ν or ν decay Compare ν, ⎯ν oscillations Test of CPT violation Atmospheric neutrino oscillations Phys. Rev. D73, 072002 (2006) Far Detector: 5400 tons Near Detector: 980 tons Detector 2 2 Detector 1 735 km Presentation to HEPAP NuMI Neutrino Beam R. Plunkett 12 October, 2006 Horn and Stripline 207m •120 GeV protons strike the graphite target • Nominal Intensity 2.4x1013 ppp with ~2 sec cycle time. • Initial intensity ~2.5 x 1020 protons/year • Ultimate intensity ~ 3.2 x 1020 protons/year (2008-9) Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Performance of NuMI 12 October, 2006 DOE FY06 performance Excellent turn on and measure commissioning. FYO5 exceeded Fermilab Tritium expectations. Mitigation Horn water leak, replace Beamline components target have caused unscheduled Water system downtime in FY06 Horn ground problem fault repair Totals: FY05 ~6.8 x 1020 FY06 >1.0 x 1020 Presentation to HEPAP Recent Performance of Main R. Plunkett Injector for NuMI (10/2/06) 12 October, 2006 Protons per Beam Power extraction 1012 Protons Kilowatts Presentation to HEPAP The MINOS Detectors R. Plunkett 12 October, 2006 NEAR FAR 0.98 Kton 5.4 Kton MINOS Detector Hall, Fermilab Soudan Underground Lab, Minnesota Both detectors are tracking calorimeters composed of interleaved planes of steel and scintillator – uptimes routinely exceed 95-97%. - 2.54 cm thick steel planes -4.1 cm wide scintillator strips - 1.5 T toroidal magnetic field. - Multi-Anode Hamamatsu PMTs (M16 Far & M64 Near) - Near electronics optimized for high occupancy (~20) during 10 µs spill - Energy resolution: 55%/√E for hadrons, 23%/√E for electrons - Muon momentum resolution ~ 6 % from range ( ~ 12 % from curvature ) Presentation to HEPAP Large event rate in near detector R. Plunkett 12 October, 2006 A spill (10 µs) in near detector Individual Events Beam arrives in 10 µs batches Multiple events separated by timing, topology. Relative timing greatly simplifies event identification at far detector Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Near Detector Distributions 12 October, 2006 Track Angle (wrt vert.) Mean 92.76 • Acceptance well RMS 15.75 reproduced by ND Mean 92.80 simulation RMS 15.55 • Track angle w.r.t. vertical exhibits characteristic -3o to Sneak Preview – Soudan Far Detector CC events going upward X Vertex Z Vertex ND ND ND Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Minos Far Detector Events 12 October, 2006 Contained CC event Expected rate ~3/day Far Detector triggers on spill time (50 µs window), also activity triggers Further require fiducial, angle cuts Estimate ~9% NC background, <1 cosmic event Selection of FD events and Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett prediction of Spectrum 12 October, 2006 Event Classification Parameter POT 16 MINOS 1.27×1020 POT No oscillations Best fit Events/GeV/10 5 10 15 NearReconstructed Detector Spectrum Eν (GeV) Likelihood based on event vs. default MC (blue) and length, pulse height in track tuned MC (red) pHE/200kA Use near detector data, beam kinematics to predict far spectrum Also use bin-to-bin ratios, direct fitting to simulation, results stable. Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett MINOS Best-Fit Spectrum 12 October, 2006 FD neutrino spectrum and ratios MINOS MINOS NC Subtracted ∆ 2 = +0.44 + × −3 2 m32 2.74−0.26 (stat syst) 10 eV 2 θ = + sin 2 23 1.00−0.13 (stat syst) Expected FD Data/MC Data Sample (Matrix Method; Data (Matrix Method) Unoscillated) FD Event totals νµ (<30 GeV) 215 336.0±14.4 0.64±0.05 νµ (<10 GeV) 122 238.7±10.7 0.51±0.05 νµ (<5 GeV) 76 168.4±8.8 0.45±0.06 Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Allowed Region 12 October, 2006 • Fit includes penalty terms for three main systematic uncertainties – Near/Far Normalization – Hadronic E scale – NC contamination • Fit is constrained to physical region: 2 θ sin (2 23)≤1 ∆ 2 = +0.44 × −3 2 m 32 2.74 −0.26 10 eV 2 θ = sin 2 23 1.00 −0.13 Presentation to HEPAP Fermilab Proton Plan for R. Plunkett NuMI Beamline 12 October, 2006 Currently, 5 booster batches for NuMI is main running mode Expansion of “slip-stacking” scheme will allow 9 batch running. Move from current values to ~400 kW. Within booster capability Expect Main Injector collimators (control losses) and some RF changes required for high intensities Slip-stacking graphically Proton plan has realistic shutdowns, First batches blue efficiencies, turn-on curves. Second batches purple Presentation to HEPAP Proton Plan Expectation for R. Plunkett NuMI Beam 12 October, 2006 16 NuMI Totals 1.40E+21 Base (2005 Review) Design (2005 Review) 1.20E+21 Base (from 8-1-06) Design (from 8-1-06) 1.00E+21 These values used by MINOS to 8.00E+20 7.5 compute sensitivities Protons 6.00E+20 4.00E+20 2.5 2.00E+20 Actual value as of 8/1/06 0.00E+00 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 Date Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Projected MINOS Sensitivity 12 October, 2006 νµ Disappearance • MINOS sensitivity for different POT MC MINOS MC • Current best values used as input: ∆ 2 -3 2 m 32=2.74x10 eV 2 sin 2θ23=1.00 • Contours are 90% C.L. statistical errors only Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Potential for Electron Identification 12 October, 2006 Challenging because of detector granularity – typical electron is 8 planes long, 4 strips wide. Background high – especially misidentified NC. Several algorithms under study 2θ sin2( 13) = 0.1 Beam direction ν ν beam ν ν osc µ CC NC e τ CC Total e 5.6 39.0 8.7 4.7 58.0 29.1 Background composition from MC (16 x 1020 POT) 8.7 GeV electron candidate from data Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Exclusion and Discovery Potential 12 October, 2006 Result presented as function of mass hierarchy, CP-violating phase δ. e.g mass hierarchy ±30% effect on rate. MINOS can improve significantly on CHOOZ limit. Full program of running with proton plan strengthens MINOS capabilities. 4 x 1020 POT 16 x 1020 POT Presentation to HEPAP R. Plunkett Conclusions and Expectations 12 October, 2006 • The MINOS experiment and NuMI beam have had a successful first running period. – Two publications accepted, atmospheric and beam oscillation papers – 3 more in pipeline. • Operational difficulties with the NuMI beam have been repaired – Tritium mitigation, horn and target problems – Remarkable effort by Fermilab Accelerator Division – “Industrialization” effort for spares underway • MINOS has active short and long-term physics program – Short term includes improved CC analysis, first ND physics, special topics. • Fermilab proton plan provides a well-defined path forward in proton Intensity • MINOS program has developed a robust scientific culture – Strong involvement by all segments of the collaboration in the CC PRL – Commitment to young people in positions of importance (32 postdocs, ~40 students).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Icecube Searches for Neutrinos from Dark Matter Annihilations in the Sun and Cosmic Accelerators
    UNIVERSITE´ DE GENEVE` FACULTE´ DES SCIENCES Section de physique Professeur Teresa Montaruli D´epartement de physique nucl´eaireet corpusculaire IceCube searches for neutrinos from dark matter annihilations in the Sun and cosmic accelerators. THESE` pr´esent´ee`ala Facult´edes sciences de l'Universit´ede Gen`eve pour obtenir le grade de Docteur `essciences, mention physique par M. Rameez de Kozhikode, Kerala (India) Th`eseN◦ 4923 GENEVE` 2016 i Declaration of Authorship I, Mohamed Rameez, declare that this thesis titled, 'IceCube searches for neutrinos from dark matter annihilations in the Sun and cosmic accelerators.' and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University. Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualifica- tion at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. I have acknowledged all main sources of help. Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself. Signed: Date: 27 April 2016 ii UNIVERSITE´ DE GENEVE` Abstract Section de Physique D´epartement de physique nucl´eaireet corpusculaire Doctor of Philosophy IceCube searches for neutrinos from dark matter annihilations in the Sun and cosmic accelerators.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the + ̅ Charged Current Inclusive Cross Section
    Measurement of the �! + �!̅ Charged Current Inclusive Cross Section on Argon in MicroBooNE Krishan Mistry on behalf of the MicroBooNE Collaboration 15 March 2021 New Directions in Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (NDNN) NuSTEC Workshop ICARUS T600 MicroBooNE SBND Importance of the �!-Ar cross section • MicroBooNE + SBN Program + DUNE ⇥ Employ Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers (LArTPCs) arXiv:1503.01520 [physics.ins-det] • Primary signal channel for these experiments is �!– Ar CC interactions arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex] 15 March 2021 K Mistry 2 Building a Picture of �! Interactions ArgoNeuT is the first A handful of measurements measurement made on on other nuclei in the argon hundred MeV to GeV range ⇥ Sample of 13 selected events Nuclear Physics B 133, 205 – 219 (1978) Phys. Rev. D 102, 011101(R) (2020) ⇥ Gargamelle Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 241803 (2014) ⇥ Phys. Rev. D 91, 112010 (2015) T2K J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 114 (2020) ⇥ MINER�A Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 081802 (2016) !! " !! " Argon Other 15 March 2021 K Mistry 3 What are we measuring? ! /!̅ " # • Total �!+ �!̅ Charged Current (CC) ! ! $ /$ inclusive cross section • Signature: the neutrino event ? contains at least one electron-liKe shower Ar ⇥ No requirements on the presence (or absence) of any additional particle ⇥ Do not differentiate between �! and �!̅ Inclusive channel is the most straightforward channel to compare to predictions 15 March 2021 K Mistry 4 MicroBooNE • Measurement is performed • Features of a LArTPC using the MicroBooNE detector: LArTPC ⇥ Precise calorimetry ⇥ 4�
    [Show full text]
  • First MINOS Results from the Numi Beam Nathaniel Tagg, for the MINOS Collaboration Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, USA 02155 FERMILAB-CONF-06-130-E
    First MINOS Results from the NuMI Beam Nathaniel Tagg, for the MINOS Collaboration Tufts University, 4 Colby Street, Medford, MA, USA 02155 FERMILAB-CONF-06-130-E As of December 2005, the MINOS long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment collected data with an exposure of 0.93 × 1020 protons on target. Preliminary analysis of these data reveals a result inconsistent with a no- oscillation hypothesis at level of 5.8 sigma. The data are consistent with neutrino oscillations reported by m2 . +0.60 × − 2 θ . +0.12 Super-Kamiokande and K2K, with best fit parameters of ∆ 23 = 3 05−0.55 10 3 and sin 2 23 = 0 88−0.15. 1. Introduction end of the run period in March 2006, the maximum in- tensity delivered to the target was in excess of 25 1012 × The MINOS long-baseline neutrino oscillation ex- protons per pulse, with a maximum target power of periment [1] was designed to accurately measure neu- 250 kW. trino oscillation parameters by looking for νµ disap- pearance. MINOS will improve the measurements of ∆m223 first performed by the Super-Kamiokande 3. The MINOS Detectors [2, 3] and K2K experiments [4]. In addition, MINOS is capable of searching for sub-dominant νµ νe os- The MINOS Near and Far detectors are constructed cillations, can look for CPT-violating modes→ by com- to have nearly identical composition and cross-section. paring νµ toν ¯µ oscillations, and is used to observe The detectors consist of sandwiches of 2.54 cm thick atmospheric neutrinos [5]. steel and 1 cm thick plastic scintillator, hung verti- The MINOS experiment uses a beam of νµ created cally.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Backgrounds and Their Implications for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Experiments Using Hpge Detectors
    Alpha Backgrounds and Their Implications for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Experiments Using HPGe Detectors Robert A. Johnson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2010 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Physics University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a doctoral dissertation by Robert A. Johnson and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Chair of the Supervisory Committee: John F. Wilkerson Reading Committee: Steven R. Elliott Nikolai R. Tolich John F. Wilkerson Date: In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to Proquest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346, 1-800-521-0600, to whom the author has granted “the right to reproduce and sell (a) copies of the manuscript in microform and/or (b) printed copies of the manuscript made from microform.” Signature Date University of Washington Abstract Alpha Backgrounds and Their Implications for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Experiments Using HPGe Detectors Robert A. Johnson Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor John F.
    [Show full text]
  • INO/ICAL/PHY/NOTE/2015-01 Arxiv:1505.07380 [Physics.Ins-Det]
    INO/ICAL/PHY/NOTE/2015-01 ArXiv:1505.07380 [physics.ins-det] Pramana - J Phys (2017) 88 : 79 doi:10.1007/s12043-017-1373-4 Physics Potential of the ICAL detector at the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) The ICAL Collaboration arXiv:1505.07380v2 [physics.ins-det] 9 May 2017 Physics Potential of ICAL at INO [The ICAL Collaboration] Shakeel Ahmed, M. Sajjad Athar, Rashid Hasan, Mohammad Salim, S. K. Singh Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202001, India S. S. R. Inbanathan The American College, Madurai 625002, India Venktesh Singh, V. S. Subrahmanyam Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India Shiba Prasad BeheraHB, Vinay B. Chandratre, Nitali DashHB, Vivek M. DatarVD, V. K. S. KashyapHB, Ajit K. Mohanty, Lalit M. Pant Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, India Animesh ChatterjeeAC;HB, Sandhya Choubey, Raj Gandhi, Anushree GhoshAG;HB, Deepak TiwariHB Harish Chandra Research Institute, Jhunsi, Allahabad 211019, India Ali AjmiHB, S. Uma Sankar Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India Prafulla Behera, Aleena Chacko, Sadiq Jafer, James Libby, K. RaveendrababuHB, K. R. Rebin Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India D. Indumathi, K. MeghnaHB, S. M. LakshmiHB, M. V. N. Murthy, Sumanta PalSP;HB, G. RajasekaranGR, Nita Sinha Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Taramani, Chennai 600113, India Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla, Amina KhatunHB Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar 751005, India Poonam Mehta Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India Vipin Bhatnagar, R. Kanishka, A. Kumar, J. S. Shahi, J. B. Singh Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India Monojit GhoshMG, Pomita GhoshalPG, Srubabati Goswami, Chandan GuptaHB, Sushant RautSR Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380009, India Sudeb Bhattacharya, Suvendu Bose, Ambar Ghosal, Abhik JashHB, Kamalesh Kar, Debasish Majumdar, Nayana Majumdar, Supratik Mukhopadhyay, Satyajit Saha Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700064, India B.
    [Show full text]
  • MINOS+: Running the MINOS Detectors in the Numi-Nova Beam
    MINOS+: Running the MINOS Detectors in the Numi-NOvA Beam (FNAL P-1016) Presented by Alexander Radovic of University College London on behalf of the MINOS Collaboration. The Proposal: The Physics Reach: By continuing to the run the MINOS detectors during the NOvA Era Not only could MINOS+ augment the sin22ϴ and Δm2 we would hope to not only help NOvA improve on its measurement measurements of NOvA, it could also represent an opportunity of the oscillation parameters but also to probe new and interesting to probe some interesting areas of new physics. Such as: areas of physics, as well as improve our understanding of the neutrino beam flux. The Study of High Energy Neutrinos. Until now most neutrino oscillation experiments have focused on the lower The diagram on the right energies where the PMNS scenario tells us oscillations will shows the approximate occur. The MINOS detectors however would see the high energy regime that the MINOS energy tail of the NOvA beam, allowing for investigation MINOS detectors will be beyond the PMNS model of oscillations. sensitive to. Clearly very different to the spectrum The Search for seen at the NOvA Sterile Neutrinos. detectors it would give a NOvA The MINOS detectors window into a completely will see a large νμ flux different physical domain. from the NOvA beam which is perfect for With the MINOS detectors searching for a sterile we have a unique neutrino with opportunity to secure 2 2 2 m 4-m 3=O(1eV ) as Fermilab's position as a it would cause the world leader in Neutrino disappearance of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrade of the Minos+ Experiment Data Acquisition for the High Energy Numi Beam Run
    FERMILAB-CONF-14-503-ND (accepted) Upgrade of the Minos+ Experiment Data Acquisition for the High Energy NuMI Beam Run William Badgett, Steve R. Hahn, Donatella Torretta, Jerry Meier, Jeffrey Gunderson, Denise Osterholm, David Saranen Abstract–The Minos+ experiment is an extension of the Minos Minos was designed a number of years before data taking experiment at a higher energy and more intense neutrino beam, commenced; by dint of technical progress, some of the with the data collection having begun in the fall of 2013. The electronics technology involved has become obsolete. The neutrino beam is provided by the Neutrinos from the Main Minos+ experiment was approved to extend the Minos data set Injector (NuMI) beam-line at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). The detector apparatus consists of two in the Noνa [2] NuMI beam era [3] with a higher energy and main detectors, one underground at Fermilab and the other in more intense neutrino beam. Both improved beam features Soudan, Minnesota with the purpose of studying neutrino result in higher signal occupancies in the Minos detector, and oscillations at a base line of 735 km. The original data especially so at the near detector located at Fermilab. The acquisition system has been running for several years collecting near detector is situated at 371 meters from the decay pipe, data from NuMI, but with the extended run from 2013, parts of while the far detector is 735 km away. At the peak beam the system needed to be replaced due to obsolescence, reliability problems, and data throughput limitations. Specifically, we have intensities of the high-energy run, we expect twenty neutrino replaced the front-end readout controllers, event builder, and interactions at the near detector per spill of ten micro-seconds data acquisition computing and trigger processing farms with duration at the near detector, compared to a maximum of three modern, modular and reliable devices with few single points of in the run ending in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minerνa Detector Construction Database
    The MINERνA detector construction database Moureen Kemei Mount Holyoke College Physics Department South Hadley, MA, 01075 Supervisor: Dave J Boehnlein Particle Physics Department MINERνA Experiment Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL, 60510 2009 Summer Internship in Science and Technology(SIST) Program Abstract We describe the construction database for the MINERν-A detector. MINERν- A is a low mass fully active neutrino detector that is designed to study low-energy neutrino interactions. The detector database keeps track of all detector components, illustrates the relationship between different compo- nents, simplifies future data entry and record maintenance. The database is written in Structured Query Language (MySQL). A Python graphical user interface for the detector has been developed. Contents 0.1 Introduction . 2 0.2 Background . 3 0.2.1 The NuMI Beam . 3 0.2.2 The Minerva Detector . 4 0.2.3 Event Reconstruction and Particle Identification . 7 0.3 The Construction Database . 8 0.3.1 Module Table . 9 0.3.2 Outer Detector Table . 10 0.3.3 Plane Table . 11 0.3.4 Outer Detector Channel Table . 12 0.3.5 Outer ECAL Table . 12 0.3.6 Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the database . 12 0.4 Summary and Conclusions . 13 0.5 Acknowledgements . 13 1 0.1 Introduction The Main INjector Experiment for ν-A (MINERνA) is a neutrino scattering experiment that will study low energy ν-nucleus interactions to high preci- sion. The NuMI (neutrino's from the main injector) beamline at Fermilab provides an intense ν(neutrino) beam for the MINERνA detector. Neutrinos outnumber protons, electrons and neutrons yet they are the most difficult particles to observe because they are weakly interacting, have a very small mass and possess no electric charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Component Study of the Numi Neutrino Beam for Noνa Experiment at Fermilab D
    Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 58 (2013) 822 Component study of the NuMI neutrino beam for NOνA experiment at Fermilab D. Grover1,* B. Mercurio2, K. K. Maan3, S. R. Mishra2 and V. Singh1 1Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005, INDIA 2Deptartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 229208, USA 3Department of Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh, INDIA * email:[email protected] 1. Introduction axis beam aids in rejecting backgrounds to the The neutrino beam, NuMI, from Fermilab’s electron neutrino appearance search. Fig. 1 shows Main Injector accelerator is the most intense the effect on neutrino energy spectrum for neutrino beam in the world. The experiment NOνA progressively larger off-axis angles. On-axis, the will use this neutrino beam to study neutrino beam produces a neutrino flux peaked at 7 GeV oscillation where neutrino of a given flavor [2]. oscillates into another flavor. The oscillation is parameterized by the PMNS mixing-matrix and the mass squared differences between the three masses. Thus, there are six variables that affect neutrino oscillation: the three mixing angles θ12, θ23 and θ13, a CP-violating phase δ, and two mass-differences. The angles θ12 and θ23 have been measured to be non zero by several experiments. In 2012, the last angle, θ13, was measured at Daya Bay/Reno to be non zero to a statistical significance of 5.2σ [1]. No measurement of the CP-violating phase, δ has been made. Furthermore, whereas the absolute values of two mass square differences are known, the ordering of the masses has not been determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Near Detector: Performance and Physics Hongyue Duyang for the Nova Collaboration
    NOvA Near Detector: Performance and Physics Hongyue Duyang For the NOvA collaboration 1 Οutline • Introduction to the NOvA near detector. • Rock-muon induced EM showers. • νe-CC inclusive cross-section measurement. • Coherent π0 cross-section measurement. • Neutrino-electron elastic scattering for absolute flux constraint. • Summary 2 Introduction • NOvA is a long-baseline neutrino experiment designed to measure νμ to νe oscillation. (See Adam Aurisano’s talk for the first result!) • The principal task of the NOvA near detector is to constrain systematics for oscillation measurement. • In addition, the NOvA near detector provides an excellent opportunity for the measurement of various neutrino interactions. • Neutrino interactions have their own physics, and are important for oscillation experiments to reduce systematics. • This talk will highlight some measurements using NOvA’s early data: • νe-CC inclusive cross-section measurement. • Coherent π0 cross-section measurement. • Neutrino-electron elastic scattering for absolute flux constraint. 3 The NOνA Near Detector NOνA Near Detector Construction NO�A NO�A Far Detector (Ash River, MN) MINOS Far Detector (Soudan, MN) A broad physics scope • • Detector construction and instrumentation0.3 kton, completed4.2mX4.2mX15.8m, Aug.Using ��→�e , � ͞ �→� ͞ e … ° Determine the � mass hierarchy ° Determine the � octant 2014 • 1 km from source, underground at Fermilab.23 ° Constrain �CP • PVC cells filled with liquid scintillatorUsing ��→�� , � ͞ .�→ � ͞ � … • Neutrinos observed within seconds of turning on! ° Precision measurements of 2 2 sin 2�23 and Dm 32. • Alternating planes of orthogonal (Exclude view. �23=�/4?) ° Over-constrain the atmos. sector Results (four oscillation channels) Also … ° Neutrino cross sections at the NO�A Near Detector ° Sterile neutrinos Bin to bin correlation matrix: ° Supernova neutrinos Fermilab ° Other exotica Ryan Patterson, Caltech • Low-Z, fine-grained (1 plane ~ 0.15X0), highly- active tracking calorimeter, optimized for EM shower reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Low Mass Dark Matter at ICARUS Detector Using Numi Beam
    Search for low mass dark matter at ICARUS detector using NuMI beam Animesh Chatterjee University of Pittsburgh for the ICARUS NuMI-Off axis WG NF03 Kick-off meeting Day 2 O&tober *+ )#)# Search for low mass dark matter at ICARUS detector using NuMI beam 2 ICARUS-T600ICARUS-T600 atat SBNSBN ProgramProgram ● First large-scale LAr-TPC in a neutrino beam. ● Two identical module: each module size : 19.6 (L) x 3.6(W) x 3.9(H) m3 ; total LAr mass ~760 tons, active LAr mass 476 tons. ● Drift distance 1.5m, drift field 500V/cm → drift time ~ 1ms. ● Installation of all the detector components completed in December 2019 ● Detector commissioning ongoing, will start taking with neutrino beam in mid November of this year. 3 PhysicsPhysics motivationmotivation ofof ICARUSICARUS ● Primary physics motivation of ICARUS experiment is search for the existence (or not)sterile neutrino. ● ICARUS is located 103 mrad off axis from NuMI beam. ● ICARUS Detector with NuMI Off axis beam will play a key role in BSM search, like Dark matter search 4 ()*erimental moti+ation for searching sub-GeV DM using Neutrino detectors Direct detection ~GeV threshold limit Accelerator based fixed target experiment has experienced much recent theoretical and experimental activity below GeV5 range DM Search with fixed target: Neutrino detectors DM Detector ND We can use the neutrino (near) detector as a dark matter detector, looking for recoil, but now with accelerator based proton beam MiniBooNE SBN 8GeV BNB Beam 8.9 GeV BNB and 120 GeV NuMI 540m to the mineral oil Beam, 3 LArTPC detector detector Our main focus is to study LDM at ICARUS-T600 Detector 6 using NuMI off-axis beam 5he5he model:model: 60ector60ector portal7portal7 ● Models of sub-GeV dark matter typically involve scalar or fermion DM and vector or scalar mediators ● Maybe the simplest model is known as the “dark photon” model.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Experiments at Fermilab
    Neutrino Experiments at Fermilab Ø Physics Motivation Ø Fermilab/NuMI neutrino beam(s) Ø Experimental Program § MINOS § Off-axis experiment § ‘Other’ experiments Ø Synergy of Neutrino Experiments and Opportunities for Collaborative efforts November 12, 2003 Indo-US Interaction Meeting on Neutrino Physics, Delhi Adam Para, Fermilab 11 Greatest Unanswered Questions of Physics Ø What is dark matter ? Ø What is dark energy ? Ø How were the elements from iron to uranium made? Ø Do neutrinos have mass ? Ø … Ø Are protons unstable ? Ø What is gravity ? Ø Are there additional dimensions ? Discover Ø How did the Universe begin ? February 2002 November 12, 2003 Indo-US Interaction Meeting on Neutrino Physics, Delhi Adam Para, Fermilab Mass Generation: Central Problem in Particle Physics (II) Version 2 (circa 2000) 1. Particles are massless 2. Higgs Peter (Pan?) comes and dispenses mass 3. Others get from their share (0.05 eV – 175 GeV) Mass generation mechanism = payroll scheme with for workers with salaries ranging from <$0.00005 to $175,000,000. Bizarre ! Why such a colossal disparity ?? Perhaps, if we knew the salary pattern of the lowest paid workers we can get some insight into the underlying rules è need to measure masses of the order of 0.01 eV and less November 12, 2003 Indo-US Interaction Meeting on Neutrino Physics, Delhi Adam Para, Fermilab Interferometry: a technique for precise measurement of mass differences Three slit interference experiment detector source A~ eikL12++eeikL ikL3 IA= 2 I(x) – interference pattern is a result of phase differences due to optical path differences (optics) or due to different masses of the neutrino components (neutrino oscillations).
    [Show full text]