DOCSLIB.ORG

State Hegemony and Sustainable Development: a Political Economy Analysis of Two Local Experiences in Turkey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Hegemony and Sustainable Development: a Political Economy Analysis of Two Local Experiences in Turkey University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Open Access Dissertations 2-2011 State Hegemony and Sustainable Development: A Political Economy Analysis of Two Local Experiences in Turkey Bengi Akbulut University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Akbulut, Bengi, "State Hegemony and Sustainable Development: A Political Economy Analysis of Two Local Experiences in Turkey" (2011). Open Access Dissertations. 330. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/open_access_dissertations/330 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATE HEGEMONY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS OF TWO LOCAL EXPERIENCES IN TURKEY A Dissertation Presented by BENGİ AKBULUT Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2011 Economics © Copyright by Bengi Akbulut 2011 All Rights Reserved STATE HEGEMONY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS OF TWO LOCAL EXPERIENCES IN TURKEY A Dissertation Presented by BENGİ AKBULUT Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________ James K. Boyce, Chair _______________________________________ Michael Ash, Member _______________________________________ Krista Harper, Member _______________________________________ Fuat E. Keyman, Member ____________________________________ Gerald Epstein, Department Chair Department of Economics ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have made it possible for me to produce this piece of work and contributed in different ways to its coming into being. It is impossible to acknowledge all of them, so this is bound to be incomplete. Jim Boyce has been incredible in listening and trying to understand where I was trying to go with all this during my trial and error phase, which lasted for quite a long time. He has been patient, respectful and supportive of my attempts of finding my way, and responded in the best possible way to my demands. He has sparked the inspiration at countless instances where I thought I lost it forever, and I am infinitely grateful for that. Michael Ash and Krista Harper have always encouraged me to keep going by showing great interest in my work and lent help in all stages. Their enthusiasm has been a major driving force, especially towards the end. Finally, Fuat Keyman has kindly accepted to be a part of the dissertation committee at the last minute and kept up with all that the “last minute” implies. Fikret Adaman is the invisible hero behind these pages. He is the unofficial committee member who has painstakingly read immature sketches of many chapters and helped me to shape them up. He is the editor who has not only tirelessly went over the whole manuscript but managed to do it humorously. He is the colleague with whom I have discussed many of the ideas that found their way in this dissertation and the mentor who literally stood by me during all stages of this work. He has been a guiding light, a very dear friend, a fierce critique and a camarade. He has taught me and produced with me so much that go beyond the present work. iv I have relied on the generous financial support of Boğaziçi University and the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) in UMass, and the logistical support of FREKANS Research Company in producing this work. I am grateful to Halil Agah, Suade Arançlı and Uygar Özesmi for sharing information and helping me establish valuable connections during the intial stages of my field work. I owe a lot to my guides, Ömer in Sultan Sazlığı and Asım in Köprülü Kanyon, who indeed made the entire study possible, and looked out for my well being in every step out in the field and eased a painful process. Finally, I am indebted to all the people who have shared their stories- they are the co-authors of this dissertation. What this work signifies goes much beyond the process of writing a dissertation and extends to years spent with wonderful people in a unique department. It would not be farfetched to say that this dissertation could not have been written in any other economics department than UMass. Two professors in particular, Nancy Folbre and Steve Resnick, have contributed fundamentally to my journey towards becoming what I deem as a good economist/a critical thinker during the last 6 years. I feel lucky to have been a part of EGSO; it has been an experience that nurtured me so much, both as an inspiration and a challenge, as it concretely showed me the value in collective work towards change. A couple of people within EGSO needs to be mentioned in particular: My comrade, and first friend in the department, Rajesh stood with me in many fights, drank with me in numerous occasions, fed me with great meals and took care of me whenever I needed it. Mike Carr has been a very dear friend who listened to me patiently during our weekly lunches and pushed me to see things that I would rather skip. Being around him provided a level of comfort that I miss deeply. I had been lucky to find Jen Cohen in my v second year and enjoy her friendship (not to mention her heroic efforts of providing me with nicotine when I broke my wrist). Armağan Gezici, Phil Mellizo and Smita Ramnarain have all been invaluable outlets of both personal and academic desparation. Many outside of the department have been significant in sustaining me, and at times, my sanity. Aycan Kapucu is practically my sister and with her I started building a life in this country. She and Zeynep İnanç are the two people without whose soothing presence I would not be able to survive. The Noho-Amherst “gang” turned a foreign place into home and proved to be the strongest bond I have established with it. Ceren Soylu has been closer than almost anyone although she was an ocean away almost all the time. Knowing that she and I have a lot to write, talk, watch, discover and conquer together is one of the most strengthening feelings. Finally, my incredible circle of friends in Turkey, with whom I grew up and shared in a way that I have quite not with anyone else, has been the strongest support in my years away from the home they provide, with their unending confidence in me and unconditional caring. My parents, Ayşe and Gültekin Akbulut, are the first leftists I know. From them I have learned the value in fighting for what is just and not to give up when disheartened, when to stand still and when to be angry, when to interfere and when to be patient. They have always been eager to understand what bothered me or what excited me, and lent their very much needed –critical- support. Mert Akbulut, my brother, has grown to be my favorite ally and I cannot wait to see what awaits us in the paths we’ll walk together. This one goes out to them. vi ABSTRACT STATE HEGEMONY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A POLITICAL ECONOMY ANALYSIS OF TWO LOCAL EXPERIENCES IN TURKEY FEBRUARY 2011 BENGİ AKBULUT, B.A., BOĞAZİÇİ UNIVERSITY M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor James K. Boyce This dissertation examines state-society relationships in Turkey through the lens of efforts to promote sustainable development at the local level. To this end, it first lays out a theoretical framework to analyze the political economy of local sustainable development, for which purpose the Gramscian state theory and its applications to the political economy of the environment are deployed. The dissertation thus situates the local social-economic-environmental processes within the making of state hegemony and the uneven impacts of state behavior on the society. The dissertation employs two case studies, each based on extensive qualitative study and quantitative data from the administration of representative surveys to operationalize this framework. At both case study sites, Sultan Sazlığı and Köprülü Kanyon, the Turkish state made explicit efforts to implement sustainable development through projects funded by the Global Environmental Facility, but failed to do so. In analyzing the reasons for failure, the dissertation documents how the Turkish state’s hegemonic practices, interacting with local power inequalities, undercut the implementation of sustainable development. It further reveals how inequalities are perpetuated by the failure of sustainable development vii and how they, in turn, prove to be impediments on sustainable development implementation at the local level. The dissertation also provides a critical lens through which community-based schemes, including co-governance and participatory management, can be examined. It highlights, in particular, the role of local inequalities and anticipations shaped by the state by conducting an econometric study. It demonstrates the different channels through which exclusion from decision-making operates, impeding the democratic functioning of these institutions and undermining efforts to promote sustainable development. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Hegemony to Ambivalence. Nato's Transformation and European Stability
    FROM HEGEMONY TO AMBIVALENCE. NATO'S TRANSFORMATION AND EUROPEAN STABILITY by Marco Cesa Università di Bologna Facoltà di Scienze Politiche and The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Bologna Center Fellowships Programme 1997-1999 Final Report submitted to NATO, Office of Information and Press, June 30 1999. NOT TO BE QUOTED WITHOUT PERMISSION 2 CONTENTS: Introduction p. 3 1. The Limits of Alliance Theory p. 4 2. Alliances: A Typology p. 7 3. NATO after the End of the Cold War p. 14 4. The Leader Asserts Itself... p. 18 4.1 Who’s Afraid of the European Pillar? p. 20 4.2 Bigger Is Better (or Isn’t It?) p. 24 4.3 Out of Area or Out of Business p. 28 5. ... and the Followers Reluctantly Comply p. 30 Tables p. 34 Bibiliography p. 35 Abstract p. 40 3 Introduction Although the scholarly literature on alliances is extremely rich and variegated1, it is no exaggeration to argue that its conceptual and theoretical content leaves something to be desired2. In the work of political scientists and analysts, alliances are invariably seen as aggregations of power, reflecting either the need to face some threat or the opportunity of achieving some gain. But diplomatic historians know better. Indeed, they often show that the functions performed by alliances are not simply confined to a third, external, party: in fact, most alliances involve functions of reciprocal control and management among the allies: in many alliances, the partners try and restrain or influence each other, and what is often at issue is not merely the pursuit of the collective interests of the alliance but the coexistence of various national interests.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Comparison of Non-Sovereign Island Territories: the Search for ‘True Equality’
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 43-66 A global comparison of non-sovereign island territories: the search for ‘true equality’ Malcom Ferdinand CNRS, Paris, France [email protected] Gert Oostindie KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] (corresponding author) Wouter Veenendaal KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] Abstract: For a great majority of former colonies, the outcome of decolonization was independence. Yet scattered across the globe, remnants of former colonial empires are still non-sovereign as part of larger metropolitan states. There is little drive for independence in these territories, virtually all of which are small island nations, also known as sub-national island jurisdictions (SNIJs). Why do so many former colonial territories choose to remain non-sovereign? In this paper we attempt to answer this question by conducting a global comparative study of non-sovereign jurisdictions. We start off by analyzing their present economic, social and political conditions, after which we assess local levels of (dis)content with the contemporary political status, and their articulation in postcolonial politics. We find that levels of discontent and frustration covary with the particular demographic, socio- economic and historical-cultural conditions of individual territories. While significant independence movements can be observed in only two or three jurisdictions, in virtually all cases there is profound dissatisfaction and frustration with the contemporary non-sovereign arrangement and its outcomes. Instead of achieving independence, the territories’ real struggle nowadays is for obtaining ‘true equality’ with the metropolis, as well as recognition of their distinct cultural identities.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Hegemony in International Relations: Ontology and Social
    Hegemony and international relations Article (Accepted Version) Antoniades, Andreas (2018) Hegemony and international relations. International Politics, 55 (5). pp. 595-611. ISSN 1384-5748 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/70470/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk A VERSION OF THIS PAPER IS FORTCOMING IN THE JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL POLITICS HEGEMONY AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Andreas Antoniades Senior Lecturer in Global Political Economy Department of International Relations University of Sussex Brighton BN1 9SN, UK Tel: +44 (0)1273 872875 Email: [email protected] Abstract The paper interrogates the current state-of-the-art in hegemony analysis in International Relations (IR).
    [Show full text]
  • US Hegemony in World Politics
    Chapter 3 US Hegemony in World Politics OVERVIEW We have seen that the end of Cold War left the US without any serious rival in the world. The era since then has been described as a period of US dominance or a unipolar world. In this chapter, we try to understand the nature, extent and limits of this dominance. We begin by narrating the story of the rise of the new world order from the First Gulf War to the US-led invasion of Iraq. We then pause to understand the nature of US domination with the help of the concept of ‘hegemony’. After exploring the political, The attack on the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in economic and cultural aspects of New York on 11 September 2001 has been seen as a US hegemony, we assess India’s watershed event in contemporary history. policy options in dealing with the US. Finally, we turn to see if there are challenges to this hegemony and whether it can be overcome. 2021–22 32 Contemporary World Politics AYESHA, JABU AND ANDREI forced to study a subject that he has no interest in. In contrast, Ayesha was doing very well in her Ayesha has lost her leg and is studies at a high school in the lucky to be alive. How can we even outskirts of Baghdad, and was discuss their problems in the same planning to study medicine in breath? We can, and must, do so. university. She lost a leg in 2003 As we shall see in this chapter, all when a missile slammed into an three have been, in different ways, air raid shelter in which she was affected by US hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • Waves of Empire US Hegemony and Imperialistic Activity from the Shores of Tripoli to Iraq, 1787–2003
    Waves of Empire US Hegemony and Imperialistic Activity from the Shores of Tripoli to Iraq, 1787–2003 Julian Go Boston University abstract: Is there a relationship between the global hegemonic position of the US on the one hand, and imperialistic activities such as war-making, sending troops abroad, colonial annexation and/or temporary military occupation? In an attempt to offer a preliminary answer to this question, this article offers a novel longi- tudinal analysis of US imperialistic activities from 1787 to 2003, and shows that America’s imperialistic activity has been punctuated by waves of high amplitude and frequency. The article also shows that each of these waves correspond to different phases in America’s career. Specifically, they are associated with America’s movement from regional to hemispheric to global dominance and, ulti- mately, to its decline from its prior hegemonic status. The analysis offers prelim- inary support for a new theory of the relationship between hegemony and imperialistic activity. keywords: American empire ✦ hegemony ✦ imperialism ✦ United States ✦ world-system Introduction Various views on ‘American empire’ have proliferated since America’s invasion of Iraq in 2003. The views run between two poles. At one end, popular writers such as Max Boot and Niall Ferguson suggest that America’s recent interventions into the Middle East are neither surpris- ing nor negative. Not only are they necessary for the ‘war on terror’, they are also the proper manifestations of America’s hegemonic status. As the US remains the world’s unrivaled economic and military power, it should use its power for good – just as the British did during their period of hegemony.
    [Show full text]
  • A Correlational Case of English
    Hegemony of the Empire to the Language Hegemony: A Correlational Case of English [PP: 150-161] Al Tiyb Al Khaiyali Department of English, Faculty of Arts, University of Sebha Sebha, Libya Omran Akasha Washington State University Pullman-WA, USA ABSTRACT Language and power have been interlinked and are noticeable in the form of presence of languages like English, French and Spanish in different countries around the world due to rules of British, French and Spanish colonies. The colonial empires made systematic attempts for linguistic and cultural colonization as well making people believe that the language of colonial rulers was superior to their local languages. The spread of English around the globe today had its roots in the colonial empire of British. Through the power, which these rulers enjoyed, they established the hegemony of their language. And in the present day, the economic and military powers of these hegemonic powers are also serving as the tools to establish their linguistic hegemony. With this background, the present paper seeks to review how hegemony of power, which Britain and America enjoyed and enjoy, is correlational with the hegemony of English language spread and use around the globe. Keywords: Language, Power, Colonization, Hegemony, English language ARTICLE The paper received on Reviewed on Accepted after revisions on INFO 01/01/2018 03/02/2018 25/04/2018 Suggested citation: Al Khaiyali, T. & Akasha, O. (2018). Hegemony of the Empire to the Language Hegemony: A Correlational Case of English. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies. 6(1). 150-161. 1. Introduction spread of English and its common use Reading this article makes one of the around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Spheres of Influence As Negotiated Hegemony
    Spheres of Influence as Negotiated Hegemony – The Case of Central Asia In the XIX century, as well as during the Cold War, spheres of influence were created and legitimized to pursue and sustain order in world politics, as well as to avoid direct confrontation between the great powers. Nowadays, they are considered as belonging to a past characterized by confrontation, power politics, balance of power and coercion. Yet, spheres of influence still constitute part of the present-day political vocabulary, and several regional dynamics are in fact framed and analysed by using this concept. Are spheres of influence returning, or have they simply evolved? How do spheres of influence look like in contemporary international relations? With a specific focus on Russia and Central Asia, this paper adopts an English School approach to the study of spheres of influence and offers a conceptualization of contemporary spheres of influence as structures of negotiated hegemony between the ‘influencer’ and the ‘influenced’ where norms and rules of coexistence are debated, contested and compromised on. The implications of this are multiple. Firstly, the approach allows for seeing spheres of influence as social structures where norms and rules of coexistence are in play. Secondly, it allows for an analysis of the implementation and the legitimacy of spheres of influence through history. Thirdly, by stressing the evolutionary character of spheres of influence, it puts the notion of their ‘return’ into question. Introduction Are spheres of influence returning?
    [Show full text]
  • American Decline and Changing Global Hegemony Addison Daniel Huygens Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2017 American decline and changing global hegemony Addison Daniel Huygens Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Huygens, Addison Daniel, "American decline and changing global hegemony" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 16148. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/16148 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. American decline and changing global hegemony by Addison Daniel Huygens A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: Political Science Program of Study Committee: Richard W. Mansbach, Major Professor James M. McCormick Timothy S. Wolters The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this thesis. The Graduate College will ensure this thesis is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2017 Copyright © Addison Daniel Huygens, 2017. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION To my parents and sister who have loved, supported, and pushed me to improve and overcome. To my grandparents who always supported and believed in me during my studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Simple Typology of Racial Hegemony Coates
    Societies Without Borders Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 5 2006 Towards a Simple Typology of Racial Hegemony Coates Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Coates. 2006. "Towards a Simple Typology of Racial Hegemony." Societies Without Borders 1 (1): 69-91. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/swb/vol1/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Cross Disciplinary Publications at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Societies Without Borders by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. SWB 1,1_f6_68-91 4/12/06 6:45 PM Page 69 Coates: Towards a Simple Typology of Racial Hegemony Rodney D. Coates Towards a Simple Typology of Racial Hegemony Abstracts Racial Hegemony, a concept developed by Omi and Winant, provides a critical tool for evaluating the modern racial state. This paper explores this tool and offers some enhancements. These enhancements, recognizing that one size does not fit all, identify different hegemonic types associated with different racial states. Implications are drawn which suggests that our efforts toward evaluating, transforming, and/or eliminating racial hegemonies are best accomplished by understanding the variations of racial hegemonies. Hacia una tipología sencilla de la hegemonía racial Le hegemonía racial, un concepto desarrollado por Omi y Winant, proporciona una herramienta crítica para evaluar el Estado racista moderno. Este articulo analiza esta herramienta y ofrece algunos matices.
    [Show full text]
  • Currency Wars and the Erosion of Dollar Hegemony
    Michigan Journal of International Law Volume 38 Issue 1 2016 Currency Wars and the Erosion of Dollar Hegemony Lan Cao Fowler School of Law, Chapman University Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil Part of the International Trade Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Lan Cao, Currency Wars and the Erosion of Dollar Hegemony, 38 MICH. J. INT'L L. 57 (2016). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol38/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Journal of International Law at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CURRENCY WARS AND THE EROSION OF DOLLAR HEGEMONY Lan Cao* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................. 57 I. A BRIEF HISTORY OF MONEY .......................... 73 A. Commodities, Coins, and Paper Money .............. 73 B. Central Bank, Federal Reserve and the Rise of the Dollar .............................................. 76 C. The Dollar in the Depression........................ 78 II. THE BRETTON WOODS AGREEMENT AND THE RISE OF THE DOLLAR ........................................... 81 III. CURRENT CURRENCY WARS ............................ 89 A. Dollar-Yuan Rivalry ................................ 90 B. New Non-Dollar Based Systems ..................... 99 CONCLUSION ................................................... 112 INTRODUCTION In recent years, much attention has been paid to the wars in Iraq, Af- ghanistan, and Syria, and the nuclear ambitions of Iran. Wars and breaches of the peace are of paramount importance and thus are rightly matters of international and national concern.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of China and American Grand Strategy in East Asia
    International Journal of Korean Unification Studies Vol. 23, No. 2, 2014, 41–63 From Hegemony to the Balance of Power: The Rise of China and American Grand Strategy in East Asia G. John Ikenberry This essay looks at America’s approach to order in East Asia. I argue that the United States has pursued a remarkably consistent grand strat- egy toward East Asia. It is built around American power, interests, and ideals. In this sense, it is not best seen as simply a geopolitical strategy of hegemony or balance of power. Rather, it is infused with distinctive American ideas about order, identity, and community. It is a synthesis of realist and liberal thinking. It has guided America’s relationship with East Asia during the long-era of U.S. hegemonic leadership, and it continues to inform today’s efforts by Washington to remain tied to East Asia and shape the terms of China’s rise. The United States seeks a regional order that is open and organized around widely-shared rules and principles of politics and economics. Chinese power and leadership will grow within the region. The American goal is not to prevent this growth in Chinese power and leadership, but to make sure it is not used to turn the region into a closed, illiberal Chinese sphere of influence. Overall, there are reasons for both the United States and China to restrain their geopolitical rivalry. They will surely struggle and compete, seeking to be the leading state in the region. But American efforts to contain China and China’s efforts to push the Unit- ed States out of the region will both be self-defeating strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolution in the West and East: Hegemony and the National Question
    CHAPTER 6 The Revolution in the West and East: Hegemony and the National Question We have seen that the national question played a crucial role in discussions about language and hegemony in the pre-revolutionary period, when Lenin had argued that the proletariat needed to demonstrate that it was through its leadership that the oppressed nationalities could achieve self-determination. Lenin argued that by removing all compulsion and adopting policies to facili- tate the social development of hitherto oppressed peoples, the proletariat could attract the oppressed to its cause. The proletariat’s internationalism would ultimately break the oppressed from the influence of the nationalist bourgeoisie and the religious authorities, and the revolution would become an example to the oppressed colonies of the great powers. There is little doubt that this policy proved itself during the revolution itself and helped to bring significant numbers of indigenous peoples over to the side of the Bolsheviks in the struggle against the White armies.1 Chaotic and regionally varied though the Civil War was, movements for national liberation generally found that what the White generals had in mind was not the national policy advocated by the Cadets, but the re-establishment of the Russian Empire. The Bolsheviks were, however, forced to defend most of the territory of the old Empire as if it were a single country and to introduce military-administrative divisions which cut across ethnographically distinct areas. Even in the aftermath of the Civil War, nations were incorporated into the ussr in a messy, complex series of struggles that involved competing geopolitical interests with a range of ‘great powers’, all of whom were keen to place the Soviet state in as great a danger as possible.
    [Show full text]