DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Program PRELIMINARY PROGRAM 55th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society 22nd Biennial Campus Radiation Safety Officers Meeting (American Conference of Radiological Safety) 27 June - 1 July 2010 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake City, Utah Key Dates Current Events/Works-In-Progress Deadline . .28 May Social/Technical Preregistration Deadline . .31 May HPS Annual Meeting Preregistration Deadline . 31 May PEP Preregistration Deadline . .31 May Hotel Registration Deadline . 5 June AAHP Courses . 26 June Professional Enrichment Program . 27 June - 1 July HPS 55th Annual Meeting . 27 June - 1 July American Board of Health Physics Written Exam . 28 June Registration Hours and Location Registration at the Salt Palace Convention Center - Foyer of Exhibit Hall A Saturday, 26 June . 2:00 - 5:00 pm Sunday, 27 June . 10:00 am - 5:00 pm Monday, 28 June . 8:00 am - 4:00 pm Tuesday, 29 June . 8:00 am - 4:00 pm Wednesday, 30 June . 8:00 am - 4:00 pm Thursday, 1 July . 8:00 - 11:00 am Saturday Saturday AAHP Courses will take place in the Hilton Hotel Sunday - Thursday All PEPs, CELs and Sessions will be at the Salt Palace Convention Center HPS Secretariat 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd. Suite 402 McLean, VA22101 (703) 790-1745; FAX: (703) 790-2672 Email: [email protected]; Website: www.hps.org 1 Table of Contents Important Events . 6 General Information . 7 Hotel Reservation Information . 7 Tours and Events Listing . 9 Scientific Program . 12 Placement Information . 32 AAHP Courses . 33 Professional Enrichment Program . 34 Continuing Education Lecture Abstracts . 46 Annual Meeting Registration Form . 48-49 CURRENT EVENTS/WORKS-IN-PROGRESS The submission form for the Current Events/Works-in-Progress poster session is on the Health Physics Society Website at www .hps .org under the Salt Lake City Annual Meeting section . The deadline for submissions is Friday 28 May 2010 . All presentations will take place as posters on Monday, 28 June between 1:00-3:00 pm . Individuals will be notified of ac- ceptance of their WIP submissions by early June . For questions regarding WIP submissions, contact Sue Burk or Lori Strong at the HPS Secretariat at 703-790-1745 or sburk@burkinc .com/lstrong@burkinc .com . NOTE FOR CHPs The American Academy of Health Physics has approved the following meeting-related activities for Continuing Education Credits for CHPs: • Meeting attendance is granted 2 CECs per half day of attendance, up to 12 CECs; • AAHP 8-hour courses are granted 16 CECs each; • HPS 2-hour PEP courses are granted 4 CECs each; • HPS 1-hour CELs are granted 2 CECs each . 2 Officers 2010 Exhibitors Howard W . Dickson, President (as of 1 April 2010) Edward F . Maher, President Elect Ameriphysics Robert Cherry, Jr ., Secretary Best Medical Darrell R . Fisher, Treasurer Bionomics, Inc John P . Hageman, Treasurer-Elect Bladewerx Richard E . Toohey, Past President Canberra CDC-Radiation Studies Branch Richard J . Burk, Jr ., Executive Secretary Cellular Bioengineering Board of Directors Chase Environmental Edgar D . Bailey Dade Moeller Alex J . Boerner Eckert & Ziegler Analytics Liz Brackett Ecology Services Eric Goldin Energy Laboratories Inc Energy Solutions Barbara L . Hamrick F&J Specialty Products Patricia L . Lee Fluke Biomedical Matthew P . Moeller G/O Corporation Dan Strom Gel Laboratories, LLC Terry Yoshizumi Health Physics Instruments Local Arrangements Committee HI-Q Environmental Products Co-chairs: Karen Langley, James O’Rear Hopewell Designs IAEA Adam Arndt ICx Radiation Dave Bernhardt J .L . Shepherd Bill Craig Lab Impex Julie Felice Landauer Jared Frandsen Laurus Systems Inc Robert J . Hoffman LND Wayne Johns Ludlum Steve Jones Mactec Elliott Lesses Mirion Technologies Jeff Lodwick MJW Technical Services Tony Mason Ortec Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Joe McDonald Philotechnics Abol Mortazavi Protean Instruments Robert Normandin Radiation Safety & Control John Olson Radiation Safety Associates Dell Potter Radiation Solutions Farand Smith S .E . International Walter Wagner Saint-Gobain Crystals Solutient Technologies 2010 Task Force - Salt Lake City Spectrum Techniques Matthew McFee, Program Committee Chair Technical Associates Ben E Edwards, Task Force Chair Thermo Scientific Nick Bates Thomas Gray & Associates Inc Kathy Brock Tidewater Tim Kirkham Tungsten Heavy Powder, Inc Bryan Lemieux US NRC Tony Mason Uticom Systems, Inc Tara Medich Michael Noska Latha Vasudevan 3 Health Physics Society Committee Meetings Salt Lake City Hilton (H); Salt Palace Convention Center (CC) Friday, 25 June 2010 HISTORY COMMITTEE 2:30-4:30 pm Executive Boardroom (H) ABHP BOARD MEETING 8:30 am-5:00 pm Salon A (H) ANSI N13.1 REVISION WORKING GROUP 2:30-5:00 pm Salon 2 (H) Saturday, 26 June 2010 SCIENTIFIC AND PUBLIC ISSUES FINANCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE 8:00 am-Noon Granite Boardroom (H) 3:00-4:30 pm President Dickson’s Suite (H) ABHP BOARD MEETING Tuesday, 29 June 2010 8:30 am-Noon Salon A (H) HPS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RULES COMMITTEE Noon-4:00 pm Presidental Suite 9:00-10:00 am 252A (CC) AAHP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AAHP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1:00-5:00 pm Salon A (H) 10:00 am-Noon 252B (CC) HP/ORS JOURNAL BOARD MEETING LABORATORY ACCREDITATION POLICY AND 3:00-6:00 pm Topaz Room (H) ACCREDITATION COMMITTEES 10:00 am-2:00 pm 150F (CC) Sunday, 27 June 2010 HP PROGRAM DIRECTORS ORGANIZATION AAHP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Noon-2:00 pm Salon 2 (H) 10:30 am-5:00 pm Salon A (H) PUBLIC INFORMATION COMMITTEE HPS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Noon-2:00 pm 252A (CC) 10:30 am-5:00 pm Alpine East (H) ANSI N323 A&B PROGRAM COMMITTEE 1:00-3:00 pm 252B (CC) 11:00 am-1:00 pm 150D (CC) GOVERNMENT AND SOCIETY RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE 1:30-3:30 pm Executive Boardroom (H) 1:00-3:00 pm Topaz Room (H) CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE CHAPTER OF- ACCELERATOR SECTION BOARD OF FICERS TRAINING SESSION DIRECTORS 2:30-4:00 pm 251D (CC) 5:00-6:00 pm Topaz (H) AAHP NOMINATING COMMITTEE 3:00-4:00 pm 252A (CC) Monday, 28 June 2010 ANSI N42.17 A&C COMMITTEE NOMINATING COMMITTEE 3:00-5:00 pm 252B (CC) Noon-3:00 pm 150F (CC) CSU RECEPTION - ALL ARE WELCOME CHAPTER COUNCIL MEETING 5:30-7:00 pm TBD 1:00-2:00 pm Ballroom A (CC) ANSI N320 1:00-4:00 pm Topaz (H) ANSI HPS N13.14 WORKING GROUP 2:00-3:00 pm Salon 3 (H) HPS SECTION COUNCIL MEETING 2:30-3:30 pm 251D (CC) 4 Wednesday, 30 June 2010 Thursday, 1 July 2010 ANSI N13.52 LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE 8:00 am-Noon 252B (CC) 7:30-9:30 am 150E (CC) HPS N.13.3 DOSIMETRY FOR CRITICALITY ANSI N13.1 REVISION WORKING GROUP ACCIDENTS 9:00 am-Noon Topaz (H) 8:00 am-Noon Salon 1 (H) HPS BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING ANSI/HPS N2.1 WORKING GROUP 11:00 am-5:00 pm Canyon AB (H) 9:00 am-Noon Salon 2 (H) HPS BOARD OF DIRECTORS LUNCH DECOMMISSIONING SECTION BOARD MEET- Noon-1:00 pm Canyon C (H) ING PROGRAM COMMITTEE Noon-1:00 pm Executive Boardroom (H) 12:30-3:00 pm Salon 2 (H) SCIENCE SUPPORT COMMITTEE Noon-2:00 pm 252A (CC) MILITARY SECTION HPS, EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING Noon-2:00 pm Topaz (H) STUDENT BRANCH MEETING Noon-2:00 pm Canyon B (H) SOCIETY SUPPORT COMMITTEE Noon-3:00 pm 150F (CC) SUPPORT COMMITTEE ON STANDARDIZING RADIATION RISK 12:15-1:15 pm 252B (CC) MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE 12:30-2:30 pm Salon 3 (H) CONTINUING EDUCATION COMMITTEE 1:00-3:00 pm 251A (CC) STANDARDS/HPSSC MEETING 1:00-4:00 pm Salon 1 (H) WEB EDITORS MEETING 1:00-5:00 pm Salon 2 (H) ANSI N42.5X 1:30-4:00 pm Canyon C (H) ACADEMIC EDUCATION COMMITTEE/AEC ACCREDITATION SUBCOMMITTEE 2:00-4:00 pm 252B (CC) ANSI N13.1 REVISION WORKING GROUP 2:30-5:00 pm Topaz (H) HOMELAND SECURITY COMMITTEE 4:30-6:00 pm Canyon B (H) 5 Important Events Welcome Reception Sessions and Course Locations Please plan on stopping in at the Hilton Hotel AAHP Courses on Saturday take place in the Sunday, 27 June, from 6:00-7:00 pm . There will Hilton Hotel . All other PEPs, CELs and sessions be an opportunity to meet friends to start your Sunday through Thursday will take place at the evening in Salt Lake City . Cash bar and light Salt Palace Convention Center . snacks will be available . AAHP Awards Luncheon Exhibits Salt Palace Convention Center Free Lunch! Free Lunch! – Noon, Monday, 28 Tuesday 29 June June . All registered attendees are invited to at- Noon-2:15 pm tend a complimentary lunch in the exhibit hall . HPS Awards Banquet Breaks Monday Afternoon-Wednesday Morn- An enjoyable evening spent with members of the ing – Featuring morning continental breakfasts Health Physics Society . This event will be held on and afternoon refreshments such as fruit, ice Tuesday, 29 June, and is an excellent opportunity cream and cookies . Be sure to stop by and visit to show your support for the award recipients as with the exhibitors while enjoying your refresh- well as the Society . The awards will be presented ments! after the dinner and the event will last from 7:00- 10:00 pm . Different this YEAR! Sign up for PEP Courses on Thursday See page 34 for Course information CRSO is meeting with HPS CRSO Sessions are Wednesday afternoon and Thursday morning - See pages 28 and 31 for details Things to Remember! All Speakers are required to check in at the Speaker Ready Room at least one session prior to their assigned session. All posters up Monday–Wednesday in Exhibit Hall Poster Session featured Monday, 1:00-3:00 pm – No other sessions at that time PEP Refund Policy – See page 34 Registration Policy: Unless payment accompanies your form, you will NOT be considered preregistered .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Time, Dose and Fractionation in Radiotherapy
    2/25/2013 The introduction of Fractionation 2-13/13 Radiobiology lecture Time, Dose and Fractionation in Radiotherapy The Four Rs of Radiobiology Repair of Sublethal Damage • Cells exposed to sparse radiation experience • Efficacy of fractionation based on the 4 Rs: sublethal injury that can be repaired – Repair of sublethal damage • Cell killing requires a greater total dose when given –Repopulation in several fractions – Reassortment of cells within the cell cycle • Most tissue repair occurs in about 3 hours and up –Reoxygenation to 24 hours post radiation • Allows for repair of injured normal tissue and gives a potential therapeutic advantage over tumor cells Reoxygenation Redistribution • Oxygen stabilizes free radicals • Position in cell cycle at time of radiation • Hypoxic cells require more radiation to kill determines sensitivity •Hypoxic tumors • S phase is radioresistant – Temporary vessel constriction •G2 phase delay results in increased radiation – Outgrowth of blood supply and capillary collapse resistance • Tumor shrinkage reduces hypoxic areas • Fractionated RT redistributes cells • Reinforces fractionated dosing • Rapidly cycling cells like mucosa, skin are more sensitive • Slower cyclers like connective tissue, brain are spared 1 2/25/2013 Repopulation • Increased regeneration of surviving fraction Basics of Fractionation • Rapidly proliferating tumors regenerate faster • Determines the length and timing of therapy course • Dividing a dose into several fractions spares normal tissues • Accelerated Repopulation – Repair
    [Show full text]
  • Molten Salt Reactor: Sustainable and Safe Reactor for the Future?
    WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN –HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Jiří Křepel :: MSR activity coordinator :: Paul Scherrer Institut Molten Salt Reactor: sustainable and safe reactor for the future? NES colloquium 14.09.2016 [email protected] INTRODUCTION Page 2 History of Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) Illustration, not MSR started at Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1950s • Aircraft Reactor Experiment (ARE)* 1960s • Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE)* 1970s • Molten Salt Breeder Reactor (MSBR)* 1970s • EIR (PSI) study (report nr. 411, 1975) fast spectrum, chlorides 1980s • Denatured Molten Salt Reactor (DMSR)* * ORNL <= <= <= Page 3 History of MSR: revival 100 90 80 1990s • Accelerator-driven transmutation 70 keff=0.95 [mA] of Nuclear Waste - ATW (LANL) 60 keff=0.97 curent 2000s • Generation IV, Amster, Sphinx, … 50 keff=0.98 40 2010s • MSFR, Mosart, … fast spectrum, fluorides Accelerator 30 keff=0.99 FHR (fluorides cooled HTR) 20 keff=0.995 2015+ • MCFR, Breed & Burn (TerraPower, PSI, …) 10 keff=0.997 WR at PSI 2.3mA 0 keff=1 fast spectrum, chlorides 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 ADS reactor power [GWth] <= <= <= Page 4 Classification of MSR MSR is a class of reactors with two groups Type of: Molten salt Application Molten salt fueled reactors cooled reactors Reactor Thermal reactors Fast reactors Fission reactors Fusion reactors Salt Fluorides Fluorides or Chlorides Fluorides Fluorides Core Graphite moderated “Empty” cylinder Graphite based fuel Blanket of the core (ZrH, H2O, D2O, Be, … (TRISO particles) (coolant and/or needs barrier) tritium production) Page 5 Anions in the salts Fluorides Chlorides 19 35 37 100% F 76% Cl + 24% Cl ] 1000 ‐ 1 [ 35Cl 37Cl 19F 0.1 100 interaction 0.01 [b] per XS 10 0.001 Total 0.0001 probabilty 1 0.00001 Capture 35Cl 37Cl 19F 0.1 0.000001 0.001 0.1 10 1000 100000 10000000 0.001 0.1 10 1000 100000 10000000 Incident neutron energy [eV] Incident neutron energy [eV] Number of collision to slow-down fast neutron (2MeV->1eV) 19F 35Cl 37Cl 142 (+big inelastic XS) 258 273 For instance: Iodine as the fission product is the next possible anion.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life
    Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life Understanding Radioactivity and Radiation in our Everyday Lives Radioactivity is part of our earth – it has existed all along. Naturally occurring radio- active materials are present in the earth’s crust, the floors and walls of our homes, schools, and offices and in the food we eat and drink. Our own bodies- muscles, bones and tissues, contain naturally occurring radioactive elements. Man has always been exposed to natural radiation arising from earth as well as from outside. Most people, upon hearing the word radioactivity, think only about some- thing harmful or even deadly; especially events such as the atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, or the Chernobyl Disaster of 1986. However, upon understanding radiation, people will learn to appreciate that radia- tion has peaceful and beneficial applications to our everyday lives. What are atoms? Knowledge of atoms is essential to understanding the origins of radiation, and the impact it could have on the human body and the environment around us. All materi- als in the universe are composed of combination of basic substances called chemical elements. There are 92 different chemical elements in nature. The smallest particles, into which an element can be divided without losing its properties, are called atoms, which are unique to a particular element. An atom consists of two main parts namely a nu- cleus with a circling electron cloud. The nucleus consists of subatomic particles called protons and neutrons. Atoms vary in size from the simple hydro- gen atom, which has one proton and one electron, to large atoms such as uranium, which has 92 pro- tons, 92 electrons.
    [Show full text]
  • 小型飛翔体／海外 ［Format 2］ Technical Catalog Category
    小型飛翔体／海外 ［Format 2］ Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC １．DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体／海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software ２．Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
    [Show full text]
  • France USA Research
    atw Vol. 61 (2016) | Issue 2 ı February safety and was subject to a separate After joint examination of this file global markets, and submitted the set of “conventional” permits. with IRSN, ASN convened the Advi- license application to the NRC in Hanhikivi­1 will be a 1,200­mega­ sory Committee for nuclear pressure September. watt VVER pressurised water reactor equipment (GP ESPN) on 30 Septem­ Westinghouse and Toshiba Corpo­ 141 of the Russian AES-2006 type. Start of ber 2015. The GP ESPN submitted its ration are working collaboratively on commissioning is scheduled for 2022 opinion and its recommendation to a limited number of customized mate­ and commercial operation for 2024. ASN. On this basis, ASN issued a rials and/or reinforcements that will | www.fennovoima.fi | 7304 position statement on the procedure allow new units to be built in areas adopted by Areva, with a certain that have a higher seismic condition. NEWS number of observations and add­ This Specialized Seismic Option will itional requests. provide the same advanced safety France The results of the new test pro­ features, modular design and simpli­ gramme will be crucial to ASN’s fied systems as the standard, NRC- Flamanville 3 EPR: ASN has decision on the suitability for service certified AP1000 plant technology. no objection to the initiation of the Flamanville 3 RPV closure head | www.westinghousenuclear.com of a new test programme and bottom head. This test pro­ | 7283 (asn) On 12 December 2015, ASN gramme will take several months. issued a position statement concern­ | www.asn.fr | 7290 ing the approach used to demonstrate the mechanical properties of the Research Flamanville 3 EPR reactor pressure vessel (RPV) closure head and bottom USA IPP: The first plasma: head proposed by Areva.
    [Show full text]
  • 00307399.Pdf
    + ASI&’rrrativc ActioIs/Eq51dS&MtSUdtyErrqsbyer < This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute, Division of Research Resources and Centers, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Edited by Ixruise Taylor, AT Division. DISCLAMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by assagency of the Uruted States &rvcrrrment. Neither the United States Ciovernanerstnor any agency thereof, nor asryof their employru, makes any *anty, express or irnpfied, or assumesany legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulnessof arsyirsfornsation, apparatus, product, or processdisclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specitlc comnserciat product. process, or aer+ce by trade name, trademark, rnamafacmrer, or otherwise, does not necessady constitute or imply ita errdorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Urdted States Government or any agency thersof. llte view and opinions of authors expressed herein do not nemsas-ity stare or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. LA-9144-MS UC-28 and UC-48 Issued: February 1982 . ● / A Linear Accelerator for Radioisotope Production L.D. Hansborough R. W. Harem J. E. Stovall i !-=-—- ‘ - I I . -.... J“’”’ .“ Los Alamos National Laboratory ~~~~la~~s Lo.Alamo.,New.exi..875.~ A LINEAR ACCELERATOR FOR RADIOISOTOPE PRODUCTION by L. D. Hansborough, R. W. Harem, and J. E. Stovall ABSTRACT A 200- to 500-uA source of 70- to 90-MeV protons would be a valuable asset to the nuclear medicine program. A linear accelerator (linac) can achieve this performance, and it can be extended to even higher energies and currents. Variable energy and current options are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data Iaea, Vienna, 2000 Iaea-Tecdoc-1168 Issn 1011–4289
    IAEA-TECDOC-1168 Compilation and evaluation of fission yield nuclear data Final report of a co-ordinated research project 1991–1996 December 2000 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Data Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria COMPILATION AND EVALUATION OF FISSION YIELD NUCLEAR DATA IAEA, VIENNA, 2000 IAEA-TECDOC-1168 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2000 Printed by the IAEA in Austria December 2000 FOREWORD Fission product yields are required at several stages of the nuclear fuel cycle and are therefore included in all large international data files for reactor calculations and related applications. Such files are maintained and disseminated by the Nuclear Data Section of the IAEA as a member of an international data centres network. Users of these data are from the fields of reactor design and operation, waste management and nuclear materials safeguards, all of which are essential parts of the IAEA programme. In the 1980s, the number of measured fission yields increased so drastically that the manpower available for evaluating them to meet specific user needs was insufficient. To cope with this task, it was concluded in several meetings on fission product nuclear data, some of them convened by the IAEA, that international co-operation was required, and an IAEA co-ordinated research project (CRP) was recommended. This recommendation was endorsed by the International Nuclear Data Committee, an advisory body for the nuclear data programme of the IAEA. As a consequence, the CRP on the Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data was initiated in 1991, after its scope, objectives and tasks had been defined by a preparatory meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • VII. Nuclear Fission and Fusion Lorant Csige
    VII.VII. NuclearNuclear FissionFission andand FusionFusion LorantLorant CsigeCsige LaboratoryLaboratory forfor NuclearNuclear PhysicsPhysics HungarianHungarian AcademyAcademy ofof SciencesSciences NuclearNuclear bindingbinding energy:energy: possibilitypossibility ofof energyenergy productionproduction NuclearNuclear FusionFusion ● Some basic principles: ─ two light nuclei should be very close to defeat the Coulomb repulsion → nuclear attraction: kinetic energy!! ─ not spontenious, difficult to achieve in reality ─ advantage: large amount of hydrogen and helium + solutions without producing any readioactive product NuclearNuclear fusionfusion inin starsstars ● proton-proton cycle: ~ mass of Sun, many branches ─ 2 + ν first step in all branches (Q=1.442 MeV): p+p → H+e +νe ● diproton formation (and immediate decay back to two protons) is the ruling process ● stable diproton is not existing → proton – proton fusion with instant beta decay! ● very slow process since weak interaction plays role → cross section has not yet been measrued experimentally (one proton „waits” 9 billion years to fuse) ─ second step: 2H+1H → 3He + γ + 5.49 MeV ● very fast process: only 4 seconds on the avarage ● 3He than fuse to produce 4He with three (four) differenct reactions (branches) ─ ppI branch: 3He + 3He → 4He + 1H + 1H + 12.86 MeV ─ ppII branch: ● 3He + 4He → 7Be + γ 7 7 ● 7 7 ν Be + e- → Li + νe ● 7Li + 1H → 4He + 4He ─ ppIII branch: only 0.11% energy of Sun, but source of neutrino problem ● 3He + 4He → 7Be + γ 7 1 8 8 + 4 4 ● 7 1 8 γ 8 + ν 4 4 Be + H →
    [Show full text]
  • Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates
    PNNL-25978 Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications Report Prepared for Alberta Innovates November 2016 SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) DISCLAIMER NOTICE This report was prepared under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as an account of work sponsored by Alberta Innovates (“AI”). Neither AI, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), DOE, the U.S. Government, nor any person acting on their behalf makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by AI, PNNL, DOE, or the U.S. Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of AI, PNNL, DOE or the U.S. Government. Deployability of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors for Alberta Applications SM Short B Olateju (AI) SD Unwin S Singh (AI) A Meisen (AI) November 2016 Prepared for Alberta Innovates (AI) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary At present, the steam requirements of Alberta’s heavy oil industry and the Province’s electricity requirements are predominantly met by natural gas and coal, respectively. On November 22, 2015 the Government of Alberta announced its Climate Change Leadership Plan to 1) phase out all pollution created by burning coal and transition to more renewable energy and natural gas generation by 2030 and 2) limit greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from oil sands operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation
    SOURCES, EFFECTS AND RISKS OF IONIZING RADIATION United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2016 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes UNITED NATIONS New York, 2017 NOTE The report of the Committee without its annexes appears as Official Records of the General Assembly, Seventy-first Session, Supplement No. 46 and corrigendum (A/71/46 and Corr.1). The report reproduced here includes the corrections of the corrigendum. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The country names used in this document are, in most cases, those that were in use at the time the data were collected or the text prepared. In other cases, however, the names have been updated, where this was possible and appropriate, to reflect political changes. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.17.IX.1 ISBN: 978-92-1-142316-7 eISBN: 978-92-1-060002-6 © United Nations, January 2017. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication has not been formally edited. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issue. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiobiology Is a Young Science and Is Solely Concerned with the Study Of
    The Rockefeller Foundation and its support of Radiobiology up to the 1970s By Sinclair Wynchank Senior Lecturer University of Cape Town Rondebosch, South Africa [email protected] © 2011 by Sinclair Wynchank Radiation biology, or radiobiology, is a very young science, solely concerned with the study of the interactions between ionizing radiation and living matter. This science slowly became a recognized field of study after the discovery of ionizing radiation (i.e., X rays) in 1895. A broadly varied and evolving terminology has been applied to aspects of radiobiology and therefore, archival searches concerning it are complex. This report is a work in progress, which mainly recounts support given by the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) to radiobiology. The RF was a most important player in the early history of radiobiology and a crucial influence in ensuring that the science steadily matured during its first six decades. Time constraints prevented all relevant items from being accessed, but a clear idea of the RF‟s strong influence on radiobiology‟s early history has resulted. Examples of RF activities to verify this assertion are given below, in by and large chronological order. After a brief analysis of RF aid, there is a short account of why its support so strongly benefitted the young science. To my knowledge there is very little written about the history of radiobiology and nothing about the role that the RF or other philanthropic bodies played in this history. Inevitably, for an extensive time, individual radiobiologists first studied other fields of science before radiobiology. Even in 2011 there are only five universities in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies
    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
    [Show full text]