DOCSLIB.ORG

Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for the Bull

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Thursday, January 14, 2010 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States; Proposed Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:22 Jan 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\14JAP2.SGM 14JAP2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS 2270 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Public Hearing: We will hold a public 378-5243; facsimile 208-378-5262. If you hearing in Boise, Idaho on February 25, use a telecommunications device for the Fish and Wildlife Service 2010, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.; and public deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information meetings in: Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339. 50 CFR Part 17 • Bend, Oregon on February 2, 2010, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.; [Docket No. FWS-R1-ES-2009-0085] • [[MO 92210-0-0009] Chiloquin, Oregon on February 3, Public Comments 2010, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.; We intend that any final action [RIN 1018-AW88] • LaGrande, Oregon on February 4, resulting from this proposed rule will be 2010, 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.; Endangered and Threatened Wildlife based on the best scientific and • Post Falls, Idaho on February 11, and Plants; Revised Designation of commercial data available and be as 2010, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m.; Critical Habitat for Bull Trout in the accurate and as effective as possible. • Missoula, Montana on February 16, Coterminous United States Therefore, we request comments or 2010, 3 p.m. to 8 p.m.; information from the public, other • Elko, Nevada on February 17, 2010, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, concerned government agencies, the 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.; Interior. scientific community, industry, or other • Wenatchee, Washington on February ACTION: Proposed rule, announcement of interested parties concerning this 23, 2010, 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.; and public hearing, and announcement of proposed rule. Verbal testimony or • Boise, Idaho on February 25, 2010, 4 availability of draft economic analysis. written comments may also be p.m. to 6 p.m. presented during the public hearing (see SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and ADDRESSES: You may submit comments the Public Hearing section below for Wildlife Service (Service), propose to by one of the following methods: • more information). We will consider revise the designation of critical habitat Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// information and recommendations from for the bull trout (Salvelinus www.regulations.gov. Search for docket all interested parties. We particularly confluentus) under the Endangered FWS-R1-ES-2009-0085 and then follow seek comments concerning: Species Act of 1973, as amended. In the instructions for submitting (1) The reasons why we should or total, approximately 36,498 kilometers comments. should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical • (km) (22,679 miles (mi)) of streams U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public habitat’’ under section 4 of the (which includes 1,585.7 km (985.30 mi) Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R1- Endangered Species Act of 1973, as of marine shoreline area in the Olympic ES-2009-0085; Division of Policy and amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), Peninsula and Puget Sound), and Directives Management; U.S. Fish and including whether there are threats to 215,870 hectares (ha) (533,426 acres Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, the species from human activity, the (ac)) of reservoirs or lakes are being Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203. • degree to which threats can be expected proposed for the revised critical habitat Public Hearing: We will hold the to increase due to the designation, and designation. The revised proposed public hearing at Boise Centre on the whether that increase in threat critical habitat is located in Adams, Grove, 850 W. Front Street, Boise, outweighs the benefit of designation; Benewah, Blaine, Boise, Bonner, Idaho. (2) Specific information on: • Boundary, Butte, Camas, Canyon, Public Meetings: We will hold the • The amount and distribution of bull Clearwater, Custer, Elmore, Gem, Idaho, public meetings at: trout habitat, Kootenai, Lemhi, Lewis, Nez Perce, o Hollingshead Barn, 1235 NE Jones • What areas occupied at the time of Owyhee, Shoshone, Valley, and Road, Bend Oregon; listing that contain features essential to Washington counties in Idaho; Deer o Chiloquin Community Center, 140 the conservation of the species should Lodge, Flathead, Glacier, Granite, Lake, S. 1st Street, Chiloquin, Oregon; be included in the designation and why, Lewis and Clark, Lincoln, Mineral, o Blue Mountain Conference Center, • Special management considerations Missoula, Powell, Ravalli, and Sanders 404 12th Street, la Grande, Oregon; or protections that the features essential counties in Montana; Baker, Clatsop, o Red Lion Templins Inn, 414 East 1st to the conservation of the bull trout that Columbia, Deschutes, Gilliam, Grant, Avenue, Post Falls, Idaho; have been identified in this proposal Harney, Hood River, Jefferson, Klamath, o Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks may require, including managing for the Lake, Lane, Linn, Malheur, Morrow, Headquarters, 3201 Spurgin Road, potential effects of climate change, and Multnomah, Sherman, Umatilla, Union, Missoula, Montana; • What areas not occupied at the time Wallowa, Wasco, and Wheeler counties o Elko Convention Center, Gold Room, of listing are essential to the in Oregon; Asotin, Benton, Chelan, 700 Moren Way, Elko, Nevada; conservation of the species and why; Clallam, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, o Wenatchee-Okanogan National (3) Land use designations and current Douglas, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Forest Headquarters, 215 Melody Lane, or planned activities in the areas Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Wenatchee, Washington; and occupied by the species, and their Kittitas, Klickitat, Mason, Okanogan, o Boise Centre on the Grove, 850 W. possible impacts on proposed critical Pend Oreille, Pierce, Skagit, Skamania, Front Street, Boise, Idaho. habitat; Snohomish, Thurston, Wahkiakum, We will post all comments on http:// (4) Any foreseeable economic, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Whitman, and www.regulations.gov. This generally national security, or other relevant Yakima counties in Washington; and means that we will post any personal impacts of designating any area that Elko county, Nevada. information you provide us (see the may be included in the final DATES: Written Comments: We will Public Comments section below for designation. We are particularly accept comments received or more information). interested in any impacts on small postmarked on or before March 15, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff entities, and the benefits of including or 2010. Because of the anticipated interest Foss, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and excluding areas that exhibit these in this proposed designation, we are Wildlife Service, Idaho Fish and impacts; planning on holding a public hearing Wildlife Office, 1387 South Vinnell (5) Whether the benefits of excluding and several public meetings. Way, Boise, ID 83702; telephone 208- any particular area from critical habitat VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:22 Jan 13, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\14JAP2.SGM 14JAP2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules 2271 outweigh the benefits of including that (8) Specific information on areas of (14) We have organized the Primary area as critical habitat under section habitat that were historically occupied, Constituent Elements (PCEs) of bull 4(b)(2) of the Act, after considering the or areas for which we have limited trout critical habitat based on the life- potential impacts and benefits of the evidence of occupancy, which we do history needs of the species. We are proposed critical habitat designation. not consider to be essential to the considering reorganizing the PCEs in Under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, we may conservation of the species in this order to improve clarity, into broad exclude an area from critical habitat if proposed rule. These areas include habitat attributes (water bodies and we determine that the benefits of such Okanogan River; Lake Chelan and migratory corridors), and identify exclusion outweigh the benefits of Stehekin River; west side tributaries to specific needs of bull trout within these including that particular area as critical Hood Canal (e.g., Dosewallips River, broad categories. This approach would habitat, unless failure to designate that Duckabush River, Quilcene River); and likely require repetition of specific specific area as critical habitat will Willapa River; features, but may be more result in the extinction of the species. (9) Specific information on areas understandable by making clear the We request specific information on: believed to be unoccupied in the relationships between the needs of the • The benefits of including specific Klamath River basin, but essential for species and the specific locations where areas in the final designation and FMO habitat; those needs are provided. We request supporting rationale, (10) Specific information as to comments on whether this • The benefits of excluding specific whether the six recovery units reorganization would improve clarity of areas from the final designation and identified in the ‘‘Critical Habitat the PCEs. supporting rationale, and Background’’ section accurately reflect (15) Whether we could improve or • Whether any specific exclusions the conservation needs of bull trout; modify our approach to designating may result in the extinction of the (11) Information on the projected and critical habitat in any way to provide for species and why (see Exclusions section reasonably likely impacts of climate greater public participation and below). change on bull trout, and any special understanding, or to better (6) Whether our exemptions under management needs or protections that accommodate public concerns and section 4(a)(3)(B) of the Act of the lands may be needed in the critical habitat comments; and (16) Specific information on ways to on Department of Defense (DOD) land at areas we are proposing.
Recommended publications
  • Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis

    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis

    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Fremont-Winema National Forest 2005 Lower Sycan River T33S,R12E,S23 Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 General Watershed Area.....................................................................................................................................2 Geology and Soils.................................................................................................................................................5 Climate..................................................................................................................................................................6 STEP 1. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED ................................................................... 7 I. Watershed and Aquatics.................................................................................................................................7 Soils And Geomorphology...............................................................................................................................................10 Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................................................................10 II. Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................................12
  • Geomorphic Surfaces of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Oregon by Jim E

    Geomorphic Surfaces of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Oregon by Jim E

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2014−5223 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, and the Geomorphic surfaces—PLATE 1 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE O'Connor, J.E., McDowell, P.F., Lind, Pollyanna, Rasmussen, C.G., Keith, M.K., 2015, Geomorphology and Flood-Plain Vegetation of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Klamath Basin, Oregon DESCRIPTION OF MAPPING UNIT Geomorphic Flood Plain (Holocene)—Area of Holocene channel migration; channels and active flood plains along the North Fork Active Tributary Flood Plain (Holocene)—Tributary channel, flood plain, and basin fill deposits in low-gradient areas subject to Sycan Flood Deposits (Holocene)—A prominent planar surface extending south discontinuously from the lower Sycan River Qfp Sprague, South Fork Sprague, main-stem Sprague, and Sycan Rivers. This map unit, divided into valley segments, is the area of Qtfp inundation, and unconfined by valley margins. Tributary channels and flanking surfaces grade to modern main-stem channels Qsf canyon to its confluence with the Sprague River. This surface stands 3 m above the active flood plain at the downstream end of the detailed mapping analysis of constructed features, historical channel change, and vegetation described in this report. This and flood plains, forming narrow and elongate map units extending into the uplands where channels become increasingly Sycan Canyon, and descends to flood plain level near the Sycan River confluence with the Sprague River. It is underlain by as Portland unit encompasses the area of channels, abandoned channels, and bar-and-scroll topography evident on the 2004 Light topographically confined.
  • Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)

    Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Resident bull trout at Dixon Creek. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office Klamath Falls, Oregon Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. B-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ...................................................... B-3 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ..................................................... B-7 Ongoing Klamath Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ................................... B-10 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...................................................................................... B-12 Recovery Measures Narrative ................................................................................................... B-15 Implementation Schedule for the Klamath Recovery Unit ....................................................... B-24 References ................................................................................................................................. B-30 Appendix I. Summary of the Comments on the Draft Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for the Klamath Recovery Unit ...........................................................................................................

  • Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Resident bull trout at Dixon Creek. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Klamath Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office Klamath Falls, Oregon Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. B-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ...................................................... B-3 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Klamath Recovery Unit ..................................................... B-7 Ongoing Klamath Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ................................... B-10 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...................................................................................... B-12 Recovery Measures Narrative ................................................................................................... B-15 Implementation Schedule for the Klamath Recovery Unit ....................................................... B-24 References ................................................................................................................................. B-30 Appendix I. Summary of the Comments on the Draft Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for the Klamath Recovery Unit ...........................................................................................................
  • The Distribution of Geologic and Artifact Obsidian from the Silver Lake/Sycan Marsh

    The Distribution of Geologic and Artifact Obsidian from the Silver Lake/Sycan Marsh

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jennifer J. Thatcher for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology. Anthropology, and Geography presented on December 8. 2000. Title: The Distribution of Geologic and Artifact Obsidian from the Silver Lake/Sycan Marsh Geochemical Source Group. South-Central Oregon. Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: J. Roth Geochemical characterization methods are commonly used in the reconstruction of prehistoric raw material use and procurement systems. Trace element studies of lithic source material and artifacts, specifically those made of obsidian, can reveal important information about the environmental and cultural factors which influence the prehistoric distribution of raw material. The current investigation uses geochemical characterization methods and data to document and evaluate the distribution of geologic and artifact obsidian that originates from the Silver Lake/Sycan Marsh (SL/SM) obsidian source. This large and prehistorically significant source is located in western Lake County, Oregon. Few source descriptions or artifact distribution studies exist for SL/SM obsidian. However, over the past decade, a significant increase in the use of geochemical characterization methods has generated a wealth of data for Oregon obsidian sources. This thesis synthesizes the results of the geochemical characterization analysis of 392 geologic obsidian specimens collected from the SL/SM source area and 1,938 SL/SM obsidian artifacts recovered from over 200 archaeological sites in Oregon, Washington and California. The artifact analytical data were derived from previously characterized artifact collections compiled and archived in an extensive database. A subset of artifacts were characterized for the purpose of this study. Based on the results of geochemical analysis of the geologic material, two distinct source boundaries are defined for the SL/SM geochemical source.
  • 1974 Sprague River Valley-Bly

    1974 Sprague River Valley-Bly

    E RIVER VALLEY- BLY 1974 KLAMATH ECHOES ------------ <:__ Sanctioned by Klamath County Historical Society NUMBER 12 The southwest side of Gearhart (Gayhart) Mountain as seen from the junction of Campbell Road and Highway 140, one mile east of Bly. The North and South Forks of Sprague River head on the slopes of Gearhart. SOLI TUDE think I shall climb to the woods today Where nobody's there to know; Only a hawk in the high, thin air And only the cattle below. And no one shall hear my coming. And no one shall see me pass. Only the wind in the great gb~st pines And the eyes in the still. green grass. Belly Cornwell - l . The Mitchell monument some ten miles northeast of Bly on the Dairy Creek Road. DEDICATION We dedicate this. the 12th is ue of Klamath Echoes, to the memory of those innocent and uninvolved persons who perished here as the result of enemy action. The marker reads: Dedicated to those who died here May 5, 1945 BY Japanese Bomb Explosion Elsie Mitchell Age 26 Jay Gifford Age 13 Edward Engen Age 13 Dick Patzke Age 14 Joan Patzke Age 13 Sherman Shoemaker Age J 1 The only place on the American Continent where death resulted from enemy action during World War II We deplore the inane stupidity of senseless vandals who have desecrated this marker. We suggest that some organization restore this marker to its former beautiful appearance. -II .. The girls' dormitory at Yalnax Sub Agency, with teachers and pupils, all unidentified. The " Galloping Goose" used on the O.C.
  • Volume II Klamath Lake Bull Trout

    Volume II Klamath Lake Bull Trout

    Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Klamath Lake Bull Trout Existing Populations The Klamath Lake Bull Trout SMU is comprised of seven existing populations and four populations classified as extinct or functionally extinct (Table 189). Populations are concentrated in headwater streams of the Sycan (above Sycan Marsh) and Upper Sprague rivers, and tributaries of Klamath Lake. Although bull trout are considered to have existed throughout the Klamath Basin (Buchanan et al. 1997), the identification and delineation of historical populations is challenging given the lack of data and historical observations. Current and historical populations are based on those identified in the Klamath River Chapter of the Bull Trout Draft Recovery Plan (USFWS 2004), known spawning distribution, and professional judgment of agency biologists. Table 189. Populations, existence status, and life history of the Klamath Lake Bull Trout SMU. Exist Population Description Life History Yes Sun Sun Creek. Resident Yes Threemile Threemile Creek. Resident Yes Long Long and Calahan creeks. Resident Yes NF Sprague Upper North Fork Sprague River and tributaries Resident including Sheepy, Boulder and Dixon creeks. Yes Deming Deming Creek. Resident Yes Leonard Leonard Creek. Resident Yes Brownsworth Brownsworth Creek. Resident No Sevenmile Sevenmile Creek. No Cherry Cherry Creek. No Coyote Coyote Creek. No Upper Sycan Upper Sycan River above Sycan Marsh. In 1999 Crater Lake National Park began eradicating brook trout in Sun Creek using antimycin treatments. During the eradiation process Sun Creek bull trout were transplanted into Lost Creek to protect against loss of the Sun Creek genetic stock (USFWS 2002). Lost creek is not considered an existing population because it is an introduced experimental population, limited in extent and condition.
  • Oregon Lakes Tui Chub (Gila Bicolor Oregonensis)

    Oregon Lakes Tui Chub (Gila Bicolor Oregonensis)

    Oregon Lakes Tui Chub tion and abundance of this subspecies. No recent (Gila bicolor oregonensis) surveys of habitats occupied by the Oregon Lakes tui chub are known. Thus, any additional, recent The Oregon Lakes tui chub, as defined here, is factors influencing its status are unknown. The endemic to the Abert Lake Basin of south-central introduction of non-native fishes also threatens the Oregon (Bills 1977). Remaining populations are continued existence of this subspecies. The type classified by the State of Oregon as vulnerable. locality population, at XL Spring, is particularly The American Fisheries Society lists the Oregon vulnerable to loss because of its restricted habitat. Lakes tui chub as a species of special concern (Williams and others 1989), although they use the Summer Basin Tui Chub common name XL Spring tui chub for this form. (Gila bicolor spp.) Distribution and Status The Summer Basin tui chub is endemic to springs and outflows in the Summer Basin of south- The Oregon Lakes tui chub complex, as originally central Oregon. The form was considered of described by Snyder (1908), consisted of tui chub uncertain taxonomic status and possibly extinct by populations in five isolated basins of south-central Bills (1977) during a thorough review of the Oregon: Silver, Summer, Abert, Alkali, and Oregon tui chub complex in southern Oregon. Warner. The pioneering work of Bills (1977) Summer Basin tui chubs were rediscovered in demonstrated that morphological divergence had 1985. This subspecies is listed as a Cl Candidate occurred among these long-isolated populations by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and as en- and he recognized that the complex of tui chubs dangered by the American Fisheries Society actually consists of four subspecies.
  • Upper Klamath Basin Redband Trout

    Upper Klamath Basin Redband Trout

    Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Upper Klamath Basin Redband Trout Existing Populations The Klamath River basin consists of discrete upper and lower segments separated near Klamath Falls. The lower portion of the basin resembles fish fauna assemblages of Rogue River and other coastal streams. The upper portion is characterized by a fish assemblage typical of other interior basins and is distinct from the lower river (Minckley et al. 1986). The Upper Klamath Lake basin contains the remnants of Pleistocene Lake Modoc, which redband trout likely invaded from interior connections (Behnke 1992). Lake Modoc eventually drained when it cut an outlet to the Pacific Ocean. Coastal steelhead trout are native to Klamath River and migrated into Upper Klamath Lake until 1917 when the construction of Copco Dam blocked fish passage. The steelhead trout in Klamath River are genetically and morphologically distinct from the native redband trout in Upper Klamath Lake (Behnke 1992). Currently, the Upper Klamath Lake basin supports the largest and most functional adfluvial redband trout populations of Oregon interior basins. The Upper Klamath Basin Redband Trout SMU is comprised of ten populations. These populations are highly variable in regard to genetics, life history, and disease resistance, and appear to share little gene flow among populations in spite of proximity and absence of physical barriers (Buchanan et al. 1994). However, the population structure of the upper Klamath Basin is still uncertain. Redband trout populations are identified based on genetic and life history studies (Buchanan et al 1994), current ODFW management plans (Fortune 1997), and review by ODFW Staff (Table 1).
  • Geomorphology and Flood-Plain Vegetation of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Klamath Basin, Oregon

    Geomorphology and Flood-Plain Vegetation of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Klamath Basin, Oregon

    Prepared in cooperation with the University of Oregon and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Geomorphology and Flood-Plain Vegetation of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Klamath Basin, Oregon Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5223 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Council Butte valley segment looking upstream from near flood-plain kilometer 59.2, Sprague River Basin, Oregon. Photograph taken by J.E. O’Connor, U.S. Geological Survey, September 16, 2006. Geomorphology and Flood-Plain Vegetation of the Sprague and Lower Sycan Rivers, Klamath Basin, Oregon By Jim E. O’Connor, Patricia F. McDowell, Pollyanna Lind, Christine G. Rasmussen, and Mackenzie K. Keith Prepared in cooperation with the University of Oregon and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5223 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
  • East Cascades Slopes and Foothills Ecoregion

    East Cascades Slopes and Foothills Ecoregion

    154 OREGON WILD GEORGE WUERTHNER GEORGE Dry Open Forests East Cascades Slopes and Foothills Ecoregion rom the snowline in the High Cascades to the Oregon portion of the conditions.The same is true of True Fir/Lodgepole until true fir eventually overtops Sagebrush Sea, the 6.8 million acres of the East Cascades Slopes and the lodgepole. Foothills Ecoregion in Oregon are defined by their location within the Mountain Hemlock is often found in pure stands at high elevations. Mountain Frainshadow of the Cascade Mountains. The highest point in the ecoregion Hemlock/Red Fir/Lodgepole is found south of the Three Sisters and on Newberry is Crane Mountain, which rises to 8,456 feet in the Warner Mountains. Crater. Beyond Oregon, this ecoregion extends north into Washington and south into Some Subalpine Fir/Engelmann Spruce Parklands are found at higher California. elevations in the Fremont National Forest. Such occurrences are the far western The East Cascades Slopes and Foothills Ecoregion is characterized by volcanism in outliers of this Rocky Mountain forest type. the form of lava flows, cinder cones and volcanic buttes, with some basin and range At lower elevations, especially east of US 97, one can find predominantly park-like topography mixed in. Much of the ecoregion’s western portion is covered with a layer stands of Ponderosa, as well as Ponderosa on Pumice that are characterized by low (from 2 inches to 50 feet thick) of pumice ash from the cataclysmic eruptions of the late understory plant cover. Mount Mazama, the remnant of which is Crater Lake. At even lower elevations, one will find Ponderosa/Oregon White Oak localized The dry continental climate in this area has greater temperature extremes than the south of The Dalles and Oregon White Oak/Ponderosa in the lower Klamath Basin.
  • Sprague River CEAP Study Report

    Sprague River CEAP Study Report

    Sprague River CEAP Study Report USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon March 2009 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382Page (TDD). 1 USDA is an equal opportunitySprague provider River and CEAP employer. Report 3/10/2009 Executive Summary Nationally, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) initiated the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) in 2003 to better document the effects of conservation practices on private lands that are often funded through federal cost-share programs (e.g. the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, the Wetland Reserve Program, the Conservation Reserve Program, and others). The Sprague River Watershed, located in the Klamath Basin, was nominated by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in 2004 for a special CEAP study due to its prominence in water and endangered species issues in the area. The Sprague River CEAP study was designed to provide information about conservation practices through field monitoring and computer model simulations of the hydrologic budget.