DOCSLIB.ORG

Typical Gabion Wall at Location

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Typical Gabion Wall at Location CAD No G9CS.dgn THE CONSTRUCTIONSITEISAPPROXIMATELY NAME OFTHEROAD MAIN ROADNo ??? kmBYROADFROMSYDNEY LOCALITY PLAN E XA MP LE O N LY GEOTECHNICAL STANDARDDRAWINGS RETAINING WALLSITE TYPICAL GABIONWALL AT LOCATION SIGNED SIGNED RECOMMENDED FOR ACCEPTANCE SENIOR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER DIRECTOR PAVEMENTAND S HENWOOD APPROVED FORUSE S YUEN S HENWOOD S YUEN DATE DATE 15/05/2019 15/05/2019 NAME OFTHECOUNCIL PHONE (02)8837-0246FACSIMILE8837-0059 99 PHILLIPSTREETPARRAMATTANSW 2150 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERINGSECTION PREPARED BY: GEO5065 FILE No REGISTRATION NoOFPLANS DS2016/001419 15/05/2019 DATE COPYRIGHT ROADSAND MARITIMESERVICES REV - 1 ISSUE No OFSHEETS SHEET No 5 1 K:\Bridge\Current_Projects\Geotechnical\G9_ReinforcedBW _STD\G9CS.dgn 15/05/2019 11:56:00 AM M A 1 0 : 6 5 : REVISION REGISTER 1 NOTES FOR USE OF THESE DRAWINGS 1 9 1 0 2 ED/REV DATE SHEET AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION AUTHORISED 1. THIS STANDARD DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED FOR THE CASE WHERE / 5 0 / TRAFFIC LIVE LOADS (NOT REFER TO SHORT TERM MAINTAINANCE) ARE 5 * 1 1/1 15/05/2019 ALL Initial issue PEP&G DIRECTLY ABOVE THE WALL AND WALL SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE n g d . THE ACTIVE BEARING PRESSURE INFLUENCE ZONE FROM LIVE TRAFFIC. I R R 2. THIS IS A STANDARD DRAWING. IT IS THE USERS RESPONSIBILITY TO 9 G \ D ASSESS THE DRAWING AND ENSURE ITS APPLICABILITY TO THE SITE. T S 3. THIS DESIGN SET IS LIMITED TO WALL HEIGHTS ¤ 3500mm (REFER TO _ W B d TABLE 2, SHEET 5). FOR WALL HEIGHTS BEYOND 3500mm A SEPARATE e c r o f DESIGN MUST BE DEVELOPED BY A SUITABLY QUALIFIED DESIGNER. n i e R 4. THIS DESIGN IS LIMITED TO 2H:1V SLOPING GROUND. _ 9 G \ 5. THE DESIGNER MUST TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION SAFE ACCESS FOR l a c i MAINTENANCE INSPECTION OF THE WALL AND CLEANING OF THE DISH n h c e t DRAIN AND OVERALL ACCESS BY THE PUBLIC TO THE TOP OF THE WALL. o e G \ A RISK ASSESSMENT MUST BE CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN PRECEDURE s t c e j AND DOCUMENTED IN THE DESIGN REPORT. SAFTY ELEMENTS DETAILED o r P _ IN THE REPORT MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE DESIGN DRAWINGS WITH t n e r r APPROPRIATE NOTES. u C \ (THIS NOTE TO BE REMOVED FOR 'AS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS). e g d i r 6. THESE DRAWINGS MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER DRAWINGS. B \ : K 7. THESE GABION WALL DRAWING ARE TO BE USED ON DOWNSLOPE ONLY. WHERE THEY ARE TO BE USED ON THE UPSLOPE SECTIONS AND ARE * PRINCIPAL ENGINEER, PAVEMENTS AND GEOTECHNICAL EXPOSED TO TRAFFIC IMPACTS, APPROPRIATE IMPACT BARRIERS ARE TO BE PROVIDED. 8. THE GABION WALL MUST BE DESIGNED AND USED IN AREA NOT ACCESSIBLE BY PUBLIC SHEET INDEX DRAWING CONTENT SHEET No COVER SHEET 1 REVISION REGISTER SHEET INDEX AND NOTES 2 GENERAL NOTES 3 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT 4 TYPICAL WALL CONFIGURATIONS 5 PREPARED BY:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SECTION, ISSUE STATUS: FOR USE A1 ORIGINAL REGISTRATION No OF PLANS SHEET No ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, NETWORK MANAGEMENT COORDINATE SYSTEM: MGA ZONE 56 HEIGHT DATUM: A.H.D. GEOTECHNICAL STANDARD DRAWINGS PREPARED CHECKED DS2016/001419 2 DESIGN W LIEW B XIAO TYPICAL GABION WALL DRAWING W LI W LIEW FILE No DATE ISSUE No OF SHEETS MANAGER REVISION REGISTER SHEET INDEX AND NOTES ISSUE DATE AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION PREP CHCK AUTH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER B XIAO GEO5065 15/05/2019 REV - 1 5 COPYRIGHT ROADS AND MARITIME SERVICES M A 1 0 : 6 5 : 1 1 9 1 0 2 / 5 0 / GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA UTILITY DISCLAIMER 5 1 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. n 15. FOR EARTHQUAKE ACCELERATION CO-EFFICIENT = REFER TO AS 5100.2 AND g d 35. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ROAD WORKS THE RELEVANT UTILITY . 2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL FACTUAL REPORT AND OR GEOTECHNICAL AS 1170.4. FOR SPECTRAL SHAPE FACTOR = REFER TO AS 1170.4. N G PLANS MUST BE OBTAINED BY DIALLING PH 1100 OR FAX 1300 652 077, 9 INTERPRETIVE REPORT FOR BOREHOLE (BH) AND SUBSURFACE INFORMATION. G 16. SURCHARGE LOADING IS 5 kPa (FOR NON-TRAFFIC). \ DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG. CAUTION, MUST BE EXCERCISED WHEN WORKING D 3. ROAD SIDE STORMWATER DRAINAGE TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS. T 17. SURCHARGE LOADING IS 20kPa FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. S IN THE VACINITY OF ALL UTILITY SERVICES. _ 4. ALL SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE PROPERLY DISCHARGED TO W 18. NOT USED. B d e THE NEARBY PIT/DRAINAGE SYSTEM. c 19. NOT USED. r o f n i GABION NOTES ROADS AND MARITIME SPECIFICATIONS e R _ CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 9 G R44 EARTHWORKS. \ l a c 5. THE GABION MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RMS QA SPECIFICATION R55. i 20. ANY UTILITIES WITHIN THE VICINITY MUST BE RELOCATED PRIOR TO B30 EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR BRIDGEWORKS. n h c e 6. GEOTEXTILES MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RMS QA SPECIFICATION R63. EXCAVATION. R63 GEOTEXTILES. t o e 7. A NON WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE INCORPORATED AT THE REAR FACE OF G 21. EXCAVATE DOWN TO THE GABION WALL FOUNDATION LEVEL. 3580 AGGREGATE FILTER MATERIALS FOR SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE. \ s t c THE GABION UNITS. e ANY TEMPORARY EXCAVATION PROFILE STABILITY TO BE 3552 SUB-SURFACE DRAINAGE PIPE (CORRUGATED PERFORATED j o r 8. GABION BASKETS MUST BE GALVANISED AND FULLY LACED TO BOTH UPPER P ASSESSED BY SUITABLY QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. AND NON-PERFORATED PLASTIC). _ t n e AND LOWER NEIGHBOURING BASKETS. r 22. PLACE 50mm OF MASS CONCRETE. R55 ROCK FILLED GABIONS AND MATTRESS. r u C 9. GABION MUST BE DIVIDED INTO CELL OF LENGTH NOT GREATER THAN 2m. \ 23. INSTALL THE FIRST LAYER OF GABION ON THE FOUNDATION. R53 CONCRETE (FOR GENERAL USE), MORTAR & GROUT. e g d i 10. THE FRONT FACE AND ALL OTHER EXPOSED FACES IN GABION SHALL BE HAND 24. INSTALL THE GEOTEXTILE AND DRAINAGE LAYER. r B \ : PACKED WITH ROCKS SO AS TO PRODUCE A SMOOTH FINISH. 25. PLACE THE BACKFILL AND COMPACT TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF K 11. NOT USED. SPECIFICATION R44. 26. REPEAT STEPS 25 AND 26 UP TO THE TOP LAYER. FOUNDATION NOTES 27. NOT USED. 12. THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF FOUNDATION IS 150 KPa. SOIL MATERIAL 13. UNSUITABLE MATERIALS BELOW THE FOUNDATION LEVEL OF THE GABION WALL MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH SELECT FILL. FOUNDATION MATERIALS 28. SOIL BEHIND SELECT FILL AND FOUNDATION MATERIAL PROPERTIES ASSUMED MUST BE VERIFIED BY SUITABLY QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ON SITE IN DESIGN ARE FOR COHESIONLESS SOIL FRICTION ANGLE 30°AND 0 KPa TO CONFIRM THE DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS. COHESION OR COHESIVE SOIL OF UNDRAINED COHESION 150 KPa. 14. FOUNDATION BASE MUST BE LEVEL PRIOR TO PLACE THE GABION WALL. 29. THIS DRAWING SET IS VALID FOR THE ASSUMED EXISTING SOIL STRENGTH/CONSISTENCY (MEDIUM DENSE OR BETTER/STIFF CLAYS OR BETTER). FOR STRENGTH LESSER THAN THOSE ASSUMED, A SEPARATE DESIGN MUST BE DEVELOPED. 30. SELECT FILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH RMS QA SPECIFICATION B30 MUST HAVE THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL PROPERTIES: - EFFECTIVE INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE GREATER THAN 32 DEGREES. - MOIST UNIT WEIGHT MUST NOT LESS THAN 20 kN/™ 31. SELECT FILL MUST BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 150mm AND COMPACTED TO 98% STANDARD COMPACTION AT 60-90% OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT BASED ON RMS QA SPECIFICATIONS R44/B30. SAFETY IN DESIGN 32. THE DESIGNER MUST TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION SAFE ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE INSPECTION OF THE WALL AND CLEANING OF THE DISH DRAIN IF ANY AND OVERALL ACCESS BY THE PUBLIC TO THE TOP OF THE WALL. A RISK ASSESSMENT MUST BE CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN PROCEDURE AND DOCUMENTED IN THE DESIGN REPORT. SAFTEY ELEMENT DETAILED IN THE REPORT MUST BE INCLUDED ON THE DESIGN DRAWINGS WITH APPROPRIATE NOTES. (THIS NOTE TO BE REMOVED FOR 'AS CONSTRUCTION' DRAWINGS) MASS CONCRETE LAYER 33. MASS CONCRETE TO CONFORM TO RMS SPECIFICAITON R53. (IN ANNEXURE R53E - CONCRETE PARAMETERS FOR UNREINFORCED CONCRETE ON EARTH FLOORS OF EXCAVATION) 34. MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH MUST BE 20 MPa. PREPARED BY:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SECTION, ISSUE STATUS: FOR USE A1 ORIGINAL REGISTRATION No OF PLANS SHEET No ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, NETWORK MANAGEMENT COORDINATE SYSTEM: MGA ZONE 56 HEIGHT DATUM: A.H.D. GEOTECHNICAL STANDARD DRAWINGS PREPARED CHECKED DS2016/001419 3 DESIGN W LIEW B XIAO TYPICAL GABION WALL DRAWING W LI W LIEW FILE No DATE ISSUE No OF SHEETS MANAGER GENERAL NOTES ISSUE DATE AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION PREP CHCK AUTH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER B XIAO GEO5065 15/05/2019 REV - 1 5 COPYRIGHT ROADS AND MARITIME SERVICES ISSUE COORDINATE SYSTEM:MGAZONE56 ISSUE STATUS: TO XXXXX TO XXXXX DATE FOR USE CHAINAGE ONCONTROLLINEMK42 ON CONTROLLINEMK42 APPROX EXISTINGGROUNDLEVEL ON CONTROLLINEMK42 SURFACE LEVEL(SAKERBLINE) ON EV42 TOP OFRETAININGWALLLEVEL DATUM RL70.000 AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION ON CONTROLLINEMK42 APPROX EXISTINGGROUNDLEVEL HEIGHT DATUM:A.H.D. A1 ORIGINAL PREP 2:1 0 0.000 75.123 75.403 75.513 CHCK 0.00 1.000 1.000 75.073 75.385 75.501 AUTH 2.000 3.000 74.857 75.350 75.460 5.100 5.000 74.465 75.313 75.423 1 % F A 7.000 74.076 75.273 75.388 L L ROAD NAME 9.000 73.827 75.232 75.342 TOP OFRETAININGWALL(EV42) 11.000 73.704 75.189 75.299 1% FALL PREPARED BY: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER MANAGER DRAWING DESIGN PREPARED E 13.000E73.617 75.143 75.253 X ELEVATION X PLAN A A ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY,NETWORKMANAGEMENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERINGSECTION, M 15.000 73.62M8 75.096 75.206 W LIEW W LI P P BH1 5 LE LE 1 O 17.000 73.636 75.04 6O75.156 B XIAO NL NL Y 19.000 73.692 74.994 75.10Y4 CHECKED SA KERBLINE,ONCONTROLLINEMK42 A 5 21.000 73.836 74.941 75.051 W LIEW B XIAO 21.000 23.000 73.965 74.885 74.995 22.900 1 DRAINAGE DISCHARGE DRAINAGE PIPE % RIPRAP PAD500x(MIN) 25.000 74.066 74.827 74.937 F A L L 27.000 74.215 74.766 74.876 GEOTECHNICAL STANDARD DRAWINGS 28.000 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT 29.000 74.389 74.704 74.826 TYPICAL GABION WALL 2:1 30 000 74.477 74.673 74.794 30.000 DRAINAGE PIPE AT FRONTOFGABIONWALLBASE APPROX EXISTINGGROUNDLEVEL C O E N V T 4 R 2 O L L I N L E I N E M K 4 2 FROM XXXXX RETAINING WALLSETOUTTABLE END START 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geotechnical Investigation Across a Failed Hill Slope in Uttarakhand – a Case Study
    Indian Geotechnical Conference 2017 GeoNEst 14-16 December 2017, IIT Guwahati, India Geotechnical Investigation across a Failed Hill Slope in Uttarakhand – A Case Study Ravi Sundaram Sorabh Gupta Swapneel Kalra CengrsGeotechnica Pvt. Ltd., A-100 Sector 63, Noida, U.P. -201309 E-mail :[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Lalit Kumar Feedback Infra Private Limited, 15th Floor Tower 9B, DLF cyber city Phase-III, Gurgaon, Haryana-122002 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: A landslide triggered by a cloudburst in 2013 had blocked a major highway in Uttarakhand. The paper presents details of the geotechnical and geophysical investigations done to evaluate the failure and to develop remedial measures. Seismic refraction test has been effectively used to characterize the landslide and assess the extent of the loose disturbed zone. The probable causes of failure and remedial measures are discussed. Keywords: geotechnical investigation; seismic refraction test; slope failure; landslide assessment 1. Introduction 2.2 Site Conditions Fragility of terrain is often reflected in the form of The rock mass in the area has unfavorable dip towards disasters in the hilly state of Uttarakhand. Geotectonic the valley side. In a 100-150 m stretch, the gabion wall configuration of the rocks and the high relative relief on the down-hill side of the highway, showed extensive make the area inherently unstable and vulnerable to mass distress. The overburden of boulders and soil had slid movement. The hilly terrain is faced with the dilemma of down, probably due to buildup of water pressure behind maintaining balance between environmental protection the gabion wall during heavy rains.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Sealing Geotechnical Exploratory Holes
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (1998) - Fourth International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 10 Mar 1998, 2:30 pm - 5:30 pm Guidelines for Sealing Geotechnical Exploratory Holes Cameran Mirza Strata Engineering Corporation, North York, Ontario, Canada Robert K. Barrett TerraTask (MSB Technologies), Grand Junction, Colorado Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Mirza, Cameran and Barrett, Robert K., "Guidelines for Sealing Geotechnical Exploratory Holes" (1998). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 7. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/4icchge/4icchge-session07/7 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 927 Proceedings: Fourth International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, March 9-12, 1998. GUIDELINES FOR SEALING GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATORY HOLES Cameran Mirza Robert K. Barrett Paper No. 7.27 Strata Engineering Corporation TerraTask (MSB Technologies) North York, ON Canada M2J 2Y9 Grand Junction CO USA 81503 ABSTRACT A three year research project was sponsored by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in 1991 to detennine the best materials and methods for sealing small diameter geotechnical exploratory holes.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual Borehole Drilling As a Cost-Effective Solution for Drinking
    water Review Manual Borehole Drilling as a Cost-Effective Solution for Drinking Water Access in Low-Income Contexts Pedro Martínez-Santos 1,* , Miguel Martín-Loeches 2, Silvia Díaz-Alcaide 1 and Kerstin Danert 3 1 Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 2 Departamento de Geología, Geografía y Medio Ambiente, Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad de Alcalá, Campus Universitario, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Ask for Water GmbH, Zürcherstr 204F, 9014 St Gallen, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-659-969-338 Received: 7 June 2020; Accepted: 7 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: Water access remains a challenge in rural areas of low-income countries. Manual drilling technologies have the potential to enhance water access by providing a low cost drinking water alternative for communities in low and middle income countries. This paper provides an overview of the main successes and challenges experienced by manual boreholes in the last two decades. A review of the existing methods is provided, discussing their advantages and disadvantages and comparing their potential against alternatives such as excavated wells and mechanized boreholes. Manual boreholes are found to be a competitive solution in relatively soft rocks, such as unconsolidated sediments and weathered materials, as well as and in hydrogeological settings characterized by moderately shallow water tables. Ensuring professional workmanship, the development of regulatory frameworks, protection against groundwater pollution and standards for quality assurance rank among the main challenges for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance Borehole Geophysical, Geological, And
    Reconnaissance Borehole Geophysical, Geological, and Hydrological Data from the Proposed Hydrodynamic Compartments of the Culpeper Basin in Loudoun, Prince William, Culpeper, Orange, and Fairfax Counties, Virginia [Version 1.0] By Michael P. Ryan, Herbert A. Pierce, Carole D. Johnson, David M. Sutphin, David L. Daniels, Joseph P. Smoot, John K. Costain, Cahit Çoruh, and George E. Harlow Open–File Report 2006-1203 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reconnaissance Borehole Geophysical, Geological, and Hydrological Data from the Proposed Hydrodynamic Compartments of the Culpeper Basin in Loudoun, Prince William, Culpeper, Orange, and Fairfax Counties, Virginia [Version 1.0] By Michael P. Ryan, Herbert A. Pierce, Carole D. Johnson, David M. Sutphin, David L. Daniels, Joseph P. Smoot, John K. Costain, Cahit Çoruh, and George E. Harlow Open-File Report 2006–1203 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Meyers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Trench Blasting with DYNAMITE a TRADITION of INNOVATION
    Trench Blasting with DYNAMITE A TRADITION OF INNOVATION Dyno Nobel’s roots reach back to every significant in- novation in explosives safety and technology. Today, Dyno Nobel supplies a full line of explosives products and blasting services to mines, quarries and contractors in nearly every part of the world. DYNAMITE PRODUCT OF CHOICE FOR TRENCH BLASTING One explosive product has survived the test of time to become a true classic in the industry. DYNAMITE! The dynamite products manufactured today by Dyno Nobel are similar to Alfred Nobel’s original 1860s invention yet, in selected applications, they outperform any other commercial explosives on the market. The high energy, reliability and easy loading characteristics of dynamite make it the product of choice for difficult and demand- ing trench blasting jobs. Look to Unigel®, Dynomax Pro® and Unimax® to make trench blasting as effective and efficient as it can be. DISCLAIMER The information set forth herein is provided for informational purposes only. No representation or warranty is made or intended by DYNO NOBEL INC. or its affiliates as to the applicability of any procedures to any par- ticular situation or circumstance or as to the completeness or accuracy of any information contained herein. User assumes sole responsibility for all results and consequences. ® Cover photo depicts a trench blast using Primacord detonating cord, MS ® Connectors and Unimax dynamite. SAFE BLASTING REMINDERS Blasting safety is our first priority. Review these remind- ers frequently and make safety your first priority, too. • Dynamite products will provide higher energy value than alternate products used for trenching due to their superior energy, velocity and weight strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotechnical Investigation Into Causes of Failure of a Gabion Retaining Wall
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (1988) - Second International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 03 Jun 1988, 10:00 am - 5:30 pm Geotechnical Investigation into Causes of Failure of a Gabion Retaining Wall Edward A. Nowatzki University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona Brian P. Wrench Steffen Robertson & Kirsten, Johannesburg, South Africa Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Nowatzki, Edward A. and Wrench, Brian P., "Geotechnical Investigation into Causes of Failure of a Gabion Retaining Wall" (1988). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 33. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/2icchge/2icchge-session6/33 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Proceedings: Second International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, June 1-5, 1988, St. Louis, Mo., Paper No. 6.96 Geotechnical Investigation into Causes of Failure of a Gabion Retaining Wall Edward A. Nowatzki Brian P. Wrench Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Depl, University of Arizona, Principal, Steffen Robertson & Kirsten, Johannesburg, South Africa Tucson, Arizona SYNOPSIS: This paper describes the post-failure analysis of a 26m long x 4m high gabion retaining wall located in a suburb of Johannesburg, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Borehole Drilling in Sedimentary Rocks
    MARCH 2015 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS – PHASE 2 Borehole Drilling in Sedimentary Rocks Safety is the first consideration in finding a site for a deep geological repository for Canada’s used nuclear fuel. Between 2012 and 2014, the NWMO used available geoscientific information to begin the process of learning about the geology of potential siting areas. These Phase 1 desktop studies were used to understand the regional geology and sedimentary sequence in the Bruce area and identify whether communities had the potential to satisfy the NWMO’s geoscientific site evaluation factors. The results of these desktop studies are available online, at www.nwmo.ca and the websites of local community liaison committees, and in NWMO community offices. For sedimentary rocks, the next phase of preliminary assessments include a series of geoscientific field studies such as observing general geological features, borehole drilling, and 2D-seismic surveys. Field studies will initially be conducted to advance understanding of the general geology in each community. These would be followed by more detailed studies, several years in the future, to understand the geology of potential repository sites identified through technical studies and discussions with the communities. The scope, location, and timing of field studies will be developed in collaboration with communities. Preliminary Assessments – Phase 2 / Borehole Drilling in Sedimentary Rocks 1 Borehole Drilling and Testing Borehole drilling and testing provides information about the underlying rock layers, including their geological, hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical characteristics. Activities during drilling will initially include the collection of continuous rock core that will be logged and then transported to a core storage facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics Committee
    OFFSHORE SITE INVESTIGATION AND GEOTECHNICS COMMITTEE GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE PLANNING AND EXECUTION OF GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL GROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS May 2014 GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE PLANNING AND EXECUTION OF GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL GROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS Guidance Notes for the Planning and Execution of Geophysical and Geotechnical Ground Investigations for Off shore Renewable Energy Developments ISBN 0 906940 54 0 ISBN 13 978 0 906940 54 9 First published in 2014 by Th e Society for Underwater Technology 1 Fetter Lane, London EC4A 1BR UK ©2014 Society for Underwater Technology Th is publication is protected by international copyright law. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilised in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission of the Publisher. GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE PLANNING AND EXECUTION OF GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL GROUND INVESTIGATIONS FOR OFFSHORE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS Edited by Mick Cook Co-authors Andy Barwise Will Cleverly Ray Hobbs Tony Hodgson Leo James Chris Jenner Neil Morgan Alastair Muir Wood Richard Orren Julian Osborne Rupert Rowland Charles Wark BLANK PAGE Contents 1 INTRODUCTION . 7 Part 1 - Planning 2 MANAGING GEOLOGICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL RISK . 8 3 THE GROUND MODEL . 9 3.1 What is a Ground Model? . 9 3.2 Use of the Ground Model . 10 3.3 Typical Stages in the Development of a Ground Model . 10 3.4 Desk Study . 11 3.5 Ground Investigation Programme . 12 4 PLANNING AN OFFSHORE GROUND INVESTIGATION .
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Consultant Guidelines for Highway and Bridge Projects
    SECTION 7 – GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS SECTION 7 - GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 GENERAL Geotechnical investigations are required for highway, geotechnical and bridge projects. Specific requirements and guidelines for geotechnical investigations are being prepared at the time of this writing and will be presented in the Department’s “Guidelines for Consulting Geotechnical Engineers” manual, due in March 2002. This Section presents basic principles and requirements with which to guide the geotechnical consultant in the preparation of proposals and completion of their investigations. Irrespective of the requirements listed in this document, it is important that the Consultant clearly outlines in their proposal what assumptions were made in estimating the effort and resources necessary to complete the scope of work. A project may consist of new road construction, grade widening, bridge and culvert design, and specific geotechnical projects such as landslide repair. Within any of these types of projects there may be numerous major areas of investigations, including roadway; borrow; bridge and culvert; soft ground or muskeg; landslide; erosion; and rock. General requirements for these types of investigations are outlined in the following sections. Requirements for culvert corrosion surveys are provided in this section. It should be noted that there are specific qualifications for personnel responsible for gathering field data and testing related to corrosion surveys. Requirements for topsoil survey related to topsoil conservation within the highway right-of-way, and for pre and post borrow assessments are provided in Section 4. This section provides minimum requirements for testhole spacing. Sound engineering and application of ‘common sense’ principles should govern the project requirements for testhole spacing and locating.
    [Show full text]
  • Boring Logs and Laboratory Test Results
    #$%& '( !" #$%& '( !" - #%(:;< ;& $ 6"74 2 25#' +-,##%(: <<< <& $ 6"745#' 25#'6"74 +#!%(: = =& 22 , 6"74 225#'6"74 -39#-3' -%(:=;< AAB(:; 6"7422 =B(:; =& , 6"745#' 6"74225#' - # 8 (?%(:; = & $ 6"745#'1( 1(22 1(225#' #'%(:< @ ;& $ 6"745#'1( 1(225#'6"74 4?+-1 ?%(:;@A <& 21(22 $ 6"745#'2%1(22& 21(225#'6"74 :-###%(: = & 6"7421(22 $ 6"745#'2 %1(22 & 6"7421(225#' /##%(:A ; & ,#%(: & , 6"745#'1( 1( 1(5#' ,#C--%(:; =<D E& , 6"745#'1( 1(5#'6"74 21( > #3,-##3,-##1 ? , 6"745#'2 21(5#'6"74 %1(22& %(/(@A 3(/(A & 6"7421( , 6"745#'2 %1(22 & 6"7421(5#' ,# 1 ?%(: < & ,--:# 1(26"74 /"612 /"6125#' ,*#,## 1(26"745#' /"6125#'6"74 2/"612 " 7%(:< & 2426"74 2/"6125#'6"74 6"742/"612 4>!#%(: AA& 2426"745#' 6"742/"6125#' +96!#%(/( =& 1(232426"74 /"611( '*#%(:; ;& /"611(5#' 1(232426"745#' /"611(5#'6"74 5,##%(:; ;= <& 2/"611( ,*#(! $ 2/"611(5#'6"74 6"742/"611( 89 +-- %(: == =& $ 5#'6"74 6"742/"611(5#' 89 +-- "*%(:A<@ A & , 0#2 8- # 8 (? 0#25#' %(:@ <& , 5#'6"74 0#25#'6"74 29#2 8#$'#%(:; = ;& $ 5#'1( 29#25#'6"74 7'%(/(< A=D ;E& 6"7429#2 $ 5#'1( 6"74 6"7429#25#' $ 5#'2%1(22& 4-#1( 4-#1(5#' $ 5#'2 6"74 %1(22 6"74& 4-#1(5#'6"74 2-#1( , 5#'1( 2-#1(5#'6"74 6"742-#1( # ,##(-#%,(& , 5#'1( 6"74 6"742-#1(5#' , 5#'2%1(22& /"619#2 /"619#25#' , 5#'2 6"74 %1(22 6"74& /"619#25#'6"74 # 9+ 2/"619#2 1(2 2/"619#25#'6"74 6"742/"619#2 1(25#'6"74 6"742/"619#25#' : 9 9+ 242 /"61-#1( /"61-#1(5#' 2425#'6"74 /"61-#1(5#'6"74 2-#4(11( '( ,-#+ 1(23242 2/"61-#1(5#'6"74 6"742/"61-#1( 1(232425#'6"74 6"742/"61-#1(5#' /"61/1 )"* ."* ,4( /"61/15#' /"61/15#'6"74 2/"61/1 /4 2/"61/15#'6"74 *+ /#'%-*-& /4 /84" 6"742/"61/1 /84" 6"742/"61/15#' 0-#$#!" % & ##$#!" %-'# #& "# ! ##$#!" % #& ) * # ('--+#9#'+#++ ,*'-##-319#' +F# -' ##'5#'#'#+#9+# ,# #+##('--++-##'#9#'- ##'#9 -9 #- 99##'#- '##'-#5#'#'+--9#(' #+-# --+9#9# #-# 5A ) ,0.,2 +,.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thrill to Drill
    INTERNATIONAL CONTINENTAL SCIENTIFIC DRILLING PROGRAM The Thrill to Drill After more than two decades of International Continental Scientific Drilling: A prospect for the future As most of the Earth under our feet is inaccessible, drilling is the only ground truth to correct our models and ideas about our planet's interior. Drilling does not necessarily have to be done from the surface. Here, researchers follow the drilling progress while drilling boreholes in the Moab Khotsong gold mine (South Africa) in 3 kilometers depth. The project drilled several boreholes into and around seismogenic zones to study the rupture details and scaling of small and larger earthquakes. 2 The International Continental Scientific Drilling Program – an introduction For most people, drilling into the Earth means laying the foundation for extracting natural resources from under our feet. Indeed the vast majority of all drill rigs in the world are used either for establishing water wells or for the discovery and exploitation of mineral resources or hydrocarbons like oil and gas. There is, however, another aspect of drill- ing into the Earth’s crust of which only very few people are aware. Poking a hole into the skin of our planet can help sci- entists solve some of the many mysteries which remain hidden in its vast interior. During the past one and a half centu- ries geoscientists have made enormous strides in exploring the interior of the Earth indirectly by analyzing the chem- ical composition of lava from hundreds of volcanoes or by modeling the physical conditions at depth based on the inter- pretation of seismic waves.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing and Remediating Low Permeability Geologic Materials Contaminated by Petroleum Hydrocarbons from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks: a Literature Review
    Assessing And Remediating Low Permeability Geologic Materials Contaminated By Petroleum Hydrocarbons From Leaking Underground Storage Tanks: A Literature Review U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Office of Underground Storage Tanks Washington, D.C. December 2019 Notice: This document provides technical information to EPA, state, tribal, and local agencies involved in investigating and addressing petroleum releases from leaking underground storage tanks. We obtained this information by reviewing selected literature relating to the occurrence, investigation, behavior, and remediation of contaminants in low permeability geologic materials. This document does not provide formal policy or in any way affect the interpretation of federal regulations. EPA does not endorse or recommend commercial products mentioned in this document, and we do not guarantee performance of methods or equipment mentioned. ii CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 Key Takeaways ................................................................................................................... 1 Diffusion .................................................................................................................. 1 Site Characterization .............................................................................................. 2 Heterogeneity ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]