Small Dams and Weirs in Earth and Gabion Materials Agl/Misc/32/2001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Small Dams and Weirs in Earth and Gabion Materials Agl/Misc/32/2001 AGL/MISC/32/2001 SMALL DAMS AND WEIRS IN EARTH AND GABION MATERIALS AGL/MISC/32/2001 SMALL DAMS AND WEIRS IN EARTH AND GABION MATERIALS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Land and Water Development Division Rome, 2001 Foreword Beginning in the 16th century, engineers in Europe used wicker baskets - Italian gabbioni - filled with soil to fortify military emplacements and reinforce river banks. Today, the same simple technology - now known as “gabions” - is used as the building blocks of low-cost, long- lasting hydraulic structures in developing and developed countries. These days galvanized steel wire-mesh has replaced Wicker Basket - Gabbioni wicker, and stones are used instead of soil, but the underlying strength of gabions is unchanged. The intrinsic flexibility of a gabion structure enables it to bend rather than break, thereby preventing loss of structural efficiency. Since gabions are bound together, they will withstand a degree of tension that would severely test a dry stone construction and be dangerous with plain concrete and masonry. Gabion baskets can also be manufactured - literally, by Modern gabion hand - at village-level. This is a double advantage: it lowers the purchase cost of the baskets and creates a small rural industry, using local labour. This is in line with trends towards increasing use of labour intensive techniques in modern development projects. Gabions are now recognised by most engineers throughout the world as being a standard construction material. FAO has long experience with gabion construction in various countries of the developing world, including Botswana, China, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guinea Bissau, Haiti, Niger, Malawi, Nigeria, Viet Nam, etc., where water development and irrigation projects have all made use of either imported or locally-made gabion baskets. The structures most frequently consist of earth retaining and anti-erosion structures such as retaining walls for earth excavations and embankments, sea, river and canal banks lining , small dams, spillways, weirs, groynes, etc. The design and construction of gabion structures have not always been up to standard and, as a consequence, have caused partial or total failure of the works due to lack of (or excessive subsidence of) foundations and, most often, due to the progressive infiltration and leakage of water along the interface between the gabions and adjacent earth materials and foundations. In fact, as with any civil engineering structure, unless the same care is given and attention paid to the proper design and construction of a gabion structure the result can just as well end up in failure. However, it is worthwhile noting that the inherent flexibility and ability to survive distortion without fracture is such that a badly designed gabion structure is more likely to survive than would a similar monolithic structure. The present publication is Damages a set of practical guidelines and norms for field project engineers for the design and building of small hydraulic structures using earth and gabions. This publication would be useful in designing small earth dams with a gabion spillway, intake weirs for gravity irrigation schemes, groynes, river bed training works and for protection against hydraulic erosion. Gabion construction Acknowledgements This publication is the result of a collective effort: field engineers having considerable experience have contributed, often under difficult conditions, to the design and the construction of hydraulic structures made in earth and gabion materials in FAO-executed projects in a number of countries with a large array of cultural and climatic differences. This vast experience includes mainly successful results. However, a few drawbacks have been experienced as being the result of harsh meteorological and hydrological conditions which may have been underestimated. Gabions have moved, have had unacceptable distortion and warping, some layers of gabions have been outstripped and rolled over several meters. However, these negative experiences have also had their positive side as they have contributed to an increasing experience in building safe structures under often a tight budget. Design and construction of new projects should then be carried out with a much greater factor of safety. We are grateful to the authors of this bulletin, John Charman, the late Lubtcho Kostov, Luciano Minetti, Joop Stoutesdijk and Dario Tricoli who have prepared the main report and the Annexes containing case studies. The coordination was provided by Olivier Berney. Special thanks are due to Simone Morini for his valuable assistance in the preparation and formatting of the text. John Charman further contributed in editing the final document. Small dams and weirs in earth and gabion materials vii Contents FOREWORD iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv INTRODUCTION 1 The investigation approach 1 The design approach 1 The construction approach 2 1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 3 Types of small dams 3 Earthfill dams 4 Gabion weirs 4 Earthfill dikes 5 Main components of a small dam project 5 Earth embankment 6 Spillway 7 Outlet structures 8 Investigation surveys and design 8 Collecting existing data 8 Preliminary site survey 8 Feasibility studies 8 Detailed design 9 Technology of gabions 9 2. HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES 13 Catchment 14 Basin morphology 15 Shape 15 Relief 15 Drainage pattern 16 Soils 16 Rainfall 17 Hydrological methods 18 Erosion and sediment transportation 21 Evaporation 22 viii Contents 3. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS 23 Purpose of geotechnical investigations 23 Scope of ground investigation 23 Character and variability of the ground 23 Nature of the project 24 Methods of ground investigation 26 Exploratory holes 26 Methods for taking samples 30 In-situ tests in boreholes 35 Laboratory testing 40 4. DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS AND ROCKS 43 General 43 Visual methods for the uscs classification of soils 43 Equipment and general procedure 43 Selection and preparation of the sample 46 Coarse-grained soils 46 Fine-grained soils 47 Description of soils 49 Subsidiary components 50 Consistency or relative density 50 Geotechnical properties of soil groups 50 Compacted soil properties 51 Permeability 51 Compressibility 51 Dispersivity 54 Description of rocks 55 Rock name 55 Rock texture and fabric 56 Weathering classification 57 Strength 58 Discontinuity classification 58 5. DESIGN OF GABION SPILLWAYS 59 Mitigating changes in hydraulic energy 59 Types of spillway 59 Discharge channel 61 Dimensioning 61 Protection of the sides and bottom 66 Spillway weir structure 67 Shape of weirs 67 Stilling basin 68 Hydraulic design 68 Stability analysis 79 Resistance of the foundation soil 81 Small dams and weirs in earth and gabion materials ix 6. EMBANKMENT DESIGN 83 Construction materials 83 Impervious material for upstream blanket 83 Aggregates for concrete 83 Aggregates for filters and drains 84 Rock for rip-rap, gabions and rock-fill 84 Suitable earth-fill material 84 Water loss and piping 85 Mechanism 85 Downstream drainage 85 Cut-off trench 86 Impermeable upstream blanket 87 Geotextiles as filter layers and slope protection 88 Materials 88 Use in slope protection 89 Use as separators 91 Slope stability 93 Nature of the problem 93 Stability computations 93 7. CONSTRUCTION AND QUALITY CONTROL OF EARTH AND GABION MATERIALS 101 Project planning 101 Resources required 101 Work plan 102 Work site organization 103 Earthworks 103 Site preparation 103 Embankment construction 106 Rock-fill embankments 115 Filters and protections 116 Other control checks 118 Assembly and erection of gabions structures 120 Site preparation 120 Gabion construction 121 8. CONSTRUCTION AND CONTROL OF CONCRETE 129 Aggregates 129 Grading 129 Particle shape and texture 131 Contamination 131 Durability 131 Expansion and shrinkage 131 Relative density 132 Water 132 Quality of water 132 Water content 132 x Contents Mix design 133 Quality control 135 The slump test 135 Compressive strength tests on test cubes 136 Site practice 136 Storage 136 Batching 137 Mixing 137 Curing 137 9. MAINTENANCE FOR SMALL DAMS 139 Local people’s participation 139 Management 139 Maintenance organization 140 Maintenance of earth structures 140 Vegetation growth 140 Rip-rap maintenance 140 Small repairs 141 Erosion 141 Repair of cracks 141 Maintenance of gabion structures 142 BIBLIOGRAPHY 145 ANNEX 1. CASE STUDY: HARA IRRIGATION SCHEME: RECONSTRUCTION OF HEADWORKS-GABION WEIR 147 ANNEX 2. TORRENT CONTROL WEIRS IN HAITI 161 ANNEX 3. HAND-MADE GABION MANUFACTURE 169 Small dams and weirs in earth and gabion materials xi List of figures 1.1 Typical cross-section of an earth embankment dam 6 1.2 Zoned earthfill dam 7 1.3 Examples of spillway locations 7 1.4 Woven wire mesh 11 2.1 Watershed representation 14 2.2 Steps in defining the watershed 14 2.3 Watershed shape 15 2.4 Hypsometric curve 16 2.5 Examples of watershed drainage patterns 16 2.6 Discharge hydrograph 19 3.1 Example of a trial pit log 27 3.2 A light cable percussion boring rig 28 3.3 Examples of cable tools used in percussion boring 29 3.4 Examples of undisturbed sampling and standard penetration test equipment 30 3.5 Example of drilling bits and core barrels for use in rotary core drilling 31 3.6 Example of a borehole log 32 3.7 Block sampling from a trial pit 34 3.8 Falling and rising head tests in boreholes 38 3.9 Packer test 39 4.1 USCS soil classification chart 44 4.2 Data form for visual classification of soil samples 45 4.3 Terms in the soil description for angularity of coarse particles 51 4.4 Typical
Recommended publications
  • Sloping and Benching Systems
    Trenching and Excavation Operations SLOPING AND BENCHING SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES Upon the completion of this section, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the difference between maximum allowable slope and actual slope. 2. Observe how the angle of various sloped systems varies with soil type. 3. Evaluate layered systems to determine the proper trench slope. 4. Illustrate how shield systems and sloping systems interface in combination systems. ©HMTRI 2000 Page 42 Trenching REV­1 Trenching and Excavation Operations SLOPING SYSTEMS If enough surface room is available, sloping or benching the trench walls will offer excellent protection without any additional equipment. Cutting the slope of the excavation back to its prescribed angle will allow the forces of cohesion (if present) and internal friction to hold the soil together and keep it from flowing downs the face of the trench. The soil type primarily determines the excavation angle. Sloping a method of protecting employees from cave­ins by excavating to form sides of an excavation that are inclined away from the excavations so as to prevent cave­ins. In practice, it may be difficult to accurately determine these sloping angles. Most of the time, the depth of the trench is known or can easily be determined. Based on the vertical depth, the amount of cutback on each side of the trench can be calculated. A formula to calculate these cutback distances will be included with each slope diagram. NOTE: Remember, the beginning of the cutback distance begins at the toe of the slope, not the center of the trench. Accordingly, the cutback distance will be the same regardless of how wide the trench is at the bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • Division 31: Earthworks
    FACILITIES MANAGEMENT – DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION EDITION: APRIL 29, 2020 4202 E. FOWLER AVENUE, OPM 100 | TAMPA, FLORIDA 33620-7550 PHONE: (813) 974-2845 | WEBSITE: usf.edu/fm-dc DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES DIVISION 31 EARTHWORKS DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK SECTION 31 05 00 EARTHWORK ............................................................................................................ 2 SECTION 31 10 00 SITE CLEARING ........................................................................................................ 5 SECTION 31 60 00 FOUNDATION ............................................................................................................ 6 DIVISION 31 EARTHWORKS PAGE 1 OF 7 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES SECTION 31 05 00 EARTHWORK 1.1 SITE GRADING A. Rough Grading: Slopes shall not be steeper than one (1) vertical to five (5) horizontal in general open lawn and other grassed areas. Steeper slopes will be permitted only on a case-by-case basis where special need warrants. Tops and bottoms of banks and other break points shall be rounded to provide smooth and graceful transitions. In areas of walks without ramps, slopes shall not be steeper than one (1) vertical to twenty (20) horizontal. Ensure ramped areas comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) and Florida Accessibility Code, and meet the intent of the FBC, Chapter 468. B. Finish Grading: This operation shall consist of the final dressing to provide a uniform layer of the topsoil and/or nutrients required
    [Show full text]
  • Water Well Drilling for the Prospective Owner
    WATER WELL DRILLING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE WELL OWNER (INDIVIDUAL, DOMESTIC USE) WATER WELL DRILLING FOR THE PROSPECTIVE WELL OWNER (INDIVIDUAL, DOMESTIC USE) This pamphlet was compiled by the Board of Water Well Contractors primarily to assist prospective owners of non-public wells. While much of the information is also useful for community, multi-family, or public water supply wells; there are additional considerations, not discussed in this publication, that need to be addressed. If you are the current or prospective owner of a community, multi- family, or public water supply well; please contact the Dept. of Environmental Quality, Public Water Supply Division for assistance. Contact information can be found at the end of this publication. Revised 2007 How Much Water Do I Need? You will need a dependable water supply for your present and future uses. An average household uses approximately 200-400 gallons of water per day. For a family of four, this means that a domestic well should provide a dependable yield of 10 to 25 gallons per minute (gpm) to adequately supply all needs, including lawn and garden watering. Much smaller yields may be acceptable, if adequate storage tanks are used. Most mortgage companies require a well yield of at least 5 gpm. More specific information is available from county sanitarians, engineering firms, water well contractors, or pump installers. Before you have your well drilled, find out from a local drilling contractor, the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC), or the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG) how much water can be produced from the aquifers in your area, the chemical quality of that water, and the depth to the water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Item Unit of Specification Description Number
    ITEM UNIT OF SPECIFICATION DESCRIPTION NUMBER MEASURE YEAR REFERENCE ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.00 CAL DAY 08 SURVEILLANCE OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.04 DAY 08 ENDANGERED SPECIES DAILY SURVEYOR ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.06 BARR DAY 08 VERTICAL PANELS ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.08 BARR DAY 08 422.00 BARRICADE, TYPE II ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.10 BARR DAY 08 422.00 BARRICADE, TYPE III ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.20 EACH 08 BARRICADE, TYPE III ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.30 LIGHT DAY 08 422.00 TYPE B HIGH INTENSITY WARNING LIGHT ------- ----------------- --------- ------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0001.45 BARR DAY 08 REFLECTORIZED PLASTIC DRUM -------
    [Show full text]
  • Well Foundation Is the Most Commonly Adopted Foundation for Major Bridges in India
    Well foundation is the most commonly adopted foundation for major bridges in India. Since then many major bridges across wide rivers have been founded on wells. Well foundation is preferable to pile foundation when foundation has to resist large lateral forces. The construction principles of well foundation are similar to the conventional wells sunk for underground water. But relatively rigid and engineering behaviour. Well foundations have been used in India for centuries. The famous Taj Mahal at Agra stands on well foundation. To know the construction of well foundation. To know the different types and shapes of well foundations. To know which type of well foundation is suitable for different types of soil strata. Wells have different shapes and accordingly they are named as:- 1. Circular well, 2. Double D well, 3. Twin circular well, 4. Double octagonal well, 5. Rectangular well. . Open caisson or well Well Box Caisson Pneumatic Caisson Open caisson or well: The top and bottom of the caisson is open during construction. It may have any shape in plan. Box caisson: It is open at the top but closed at the bottom. Pneumatic caisson: It has a working chamber at the bottom of the caisson which is kept dry by forcing out water under pressure, thus permitting excavation under dry conditions. . Well foundation construction in bouldery bed strata Pasighat Bridge Andhra Pradesh The Important Factors of the bridge were as follows.. Length of the bridge - 704 mts. Foundation:- i. Type -Circular Well. ii. Outer Diameter -11.7 mtrs. iii. Inner Dia. -6.64 mtrs iv. Steining thickness -2.53 mtrs.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION A-A NTS 2" Grade Board Notches
    Figure 4.1 – Alternative Flow Dispersal Trench NOTES: 1. This trench shall be constructed to prevent point discharge 1' - 6" min galvanized bolts and /or erosion. *20% max 2. Trenches may be placed no closer than 50 feet to one *20% max 2" x 12" another (100 feet along flowline). pressure 3. Trench and grade board must be treated grade level. Align to follow contours of board site. 4" x 4" support 4. Support post spacing as post required by soil conditions to 2" x 2" notches ensure grade board remains 18" O.C. 36" max 12" min. clean (< 5% fines) level. 3 1 4" - 1 2" washed rock filter fabric *15% max for flow control/water quality 18" O.C. treatment in rural areas 2" SECTION A-A NTS 2" grade board notches Figure 4.2 – Pipe Compaction Design and Backfill O.D. O.D. limits of pipe W (see note 4) 3' max. 3' max. compaction limit of pipe zone 1' - 0" bedding material for flexible 1' - 0" pipe (see 0.15 O.D. min. note 6) B O.D. limits of pipe compaction 0.65 O.D. min. foundation level A* gravel backfill gravel backfill for for pipe bedding foundations when specified * A = 4" min., 27" I.D. and under 6" min., over 27" I.D. A. Metal and Concrete Pipe Bedding for Flexible Pipe span span span 3' max Flexible Pipe NOTES: 3' max 3' max 1. Provide uniform support under barrels. 1'-0" 2. Hand tamp under haunches. 3. Compact bedding material to 95% max.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOTEXTILE TUBE and GABION ARMOURED SEAWALL for COASTAL PROTECTION an ALTERNATIVE by S Sherlin Prem Nishold1, Ranganathan Sundaravadivelu 2*, Nilanjan Saha3
    PIANC-World Congress Panama City, Panama 2018 GEOTEXTILE TUBE AND GABION ARMOURED SEAWALL FOR COASTAL PROTECTION AN ALTERNATIVE by S Sherlin Prem Nishold1, Ranganathan Sundaravadivelu 2*, Nilanjan Saha3 ABSTRACT The present study deals with a site-specific innovative solution executed in the northeast coastline of Odisha in India. The retarded embankment which had been maintained yearly by traditional means of ‘bullah piling’ and sandbags, proved ineffective and got washed away for a stretch of 350 meters in 2011. About the site condition, it is required to design an efficient coastal protection system prevailing to a low soil bearing capacity and continuously exposed to tides and waves. The erosion of existing embankment at Pentha ( Odisha ) has necessitated the construction of a retarded embankment. Conventional hard engineered materials for coastal protection are more expensive since they are not readily available near to the site. Moreover, they have not been found suitable for prevailing in in-situ marine environment and soil condition. Geosynthetics are innovative solutions for coastal erosion and protection are cheap, quickly installable when compared to other materials and methods. Therefore, a geotextile tube seawall was designed and built for a length of 505 m as soft coastal protection structure. A scaled model (1:10) study of geotextile tube configurations with and without gabion box structure is examined for the better understanding of hydrodynamic characteristics for such configurations. The scaled model in the mentioned configuration was constructed using woven geotextile fabric as geo tubes. The gabion box was made up of eco-friendly polypropylene tar-coated rope and consists of small rubble stones which increase the porosity when compared to the conventional monolithic rubble mound.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanically Stabilized Embankments
    Part 8 MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EMBANKMENTS First Reinforced Earth wall in USA -1969 Mechanically Stabilized Embankments (MSEs) utilize tensile reinforcement in many different forms: from galvanized metal strips or ribbons, to HDPE geotextile mats, like that shown above. This reinforcement increases the shear strength and bearing capacity of the backfill. Reinforced Earth wall on US 50 Geotextiles can be layered in compacted fill embankments to engender additional shear strength. Face wrapping allows slopes steeper than 1:1 to be constructed with relative ease A variety of facing elements may be used with MSEs. The above photo illustrates the use of hay bales while that at left uses galvanized welded wire mesh HDPE geotextiles can be used as wrapping elements, as shown at left above, or attached to conventional gravity retention elements, such as rock-filled gabion baskets, sketched at right. Welded wire mesh walls are constructed using the same design methodology for MSE structures, but use galvanized wire mesh as the geotextile 45 degree embankment slope along San Pedro Boulevard in San Rafael, CA Geotextile soil reinforcement allows almost unlimited latitude in designing earth support systems with minimal corridor disturbance and right-of-way impact MSEs also allow roads to be constructed in steep terrain with a minimal corridor of disturbance as compared to using conventional 2:1 cut and fill slopes • Geotextile grids can be combined with low strength soils to engender additional shear strength; greatly enhancing repair options when space is tight Geotextile tensile soil reinforcement can also be applied to landslide repairs, allowing selective reinforcement of limited zones, as sketch below left • Short strips, or “false layers” of geotextiles can be incorporated between reinforcement layers of mechanically stabilized embankments (MSE) to restrict slope raveling and erosion • Section through a MSE embankment with a 1:1 (45 degree) finish face inclination.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrosion Evaluation of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
    Research Report KTC-05-28/SPR 239-02-1F KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER College of Engineering CORROSION EVALUATION OF MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH WALLS Our Mission We provide services to the transportation community through research, technology transfer and education. We create and participate in partnerships to promote safe and effective transportation systems. We Value... Teamwork -- Listening and Communicating, Along with Courtesy and Respect for Others Honesty and Ethical Behavior Delivering the Highest Quality Products and Services Continuous Improvement in All That We Do For more information or a complete publication list, contact us KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER 176 Raymond Building University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0281 (859) 257-4513 (859) 257-1815 (FAX) 1-800-432-0719 www.ktc.uky.edu [email protected] The University of Kentucky is an Equal Opportunity Organization Research Report KTC-05-28/SPR – 239-02-1F Corrosion Evaluation of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls Research Report KTC-05-28/SPR – 239-02-1F Corrosion Evaluation of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls By Tony L. Beckham Leicheng Sun Tommy C. Hopkins Research Geologist Research Engineer Program Manager Kentucky Transportation Center College of Engineering University of Kentucky in cooperation with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet The Commonwealth of Kentucky and Federal Highway Administration The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, nor the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Porosity and Permeability Lab
    Mrs. Keadle JH Science Porosity and Permeability Lab The terms porosity and permeability are related. porosity – the amount of empty space in a rock or other earth substance; this empty space is known as pore space. Porosity is how much water a substance can hold. Porosity is usually stated as a percentage of the material’s total volume. permeability – is how well water flows through rock or other earth substance. Factors that affect permeability are how large the pores in the substance are and how well the particles fit together. Water flows between the spaces in the material. If the spaces are close together such as in clay based soils, the water will tend to cling to the material and not pass through it easily or quickly. If the spaces are large, such as in the gravel, the water passes through quickly. There are two other terms that are used with water: percolation and infiltration. percolation – the downward movement of water from the land surface into soil or porous rock. infiltration – when the water enters the soil surface after falling from the atmosphere. In this lab, we will test the permeability and porosity of sand, gravel, and soil. Hypothesis Which material do you think will have the highest permeability (fastest time)? ______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest permeability (slowest time)? _____________ Which material do you think will have the highest porosity (largest spaces)? _______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest porosity (smallest spaces)? _______________ 1 Porosity and Permeability Lab Mrs. Keadle JH Science Materials 2 large cups (one with hole in bottom) water marker pea gravel timer yard soil (not potting soil) calculator sand spoon or scraper Procedure for measuring porosity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Linktm Gabions and Mattresses Design Booklet
    LinkTM Gabions and Mattresses Design Booklet www.globalsynthetics.com.au Australian Company - Global Expertise Contents 1. Introduction to Link Gabions and Mattresses ................................................... 1 1.1 Brief history ...............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Applications ..............................................................................................................................1 1.3 Features of woven mesh Link Gabion and Mattress structures ...............................................2 1.4 Product characteristics of Link Gabions and Mattresses .........................................................2 2. Link Gabions and Mattresses .............................................................................. 4 2.1 Types of Link Gabions and Mattresses .....................................................................................4 2.2 General specification for Link Gabions, Link Mattresses and Link netting...............................4 2.3 Standard sizes of Link Gabions, Mattresses and Netting ........................................................6 2.4 Durability of Link Gabions, Link Mattresses and Link Netting ..................................................7 2.5 Geotextile filter specification ....................................................................................................7 2.6 Rock infill specification .............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • CPCCST3003A Split Stone Manually
    CPCCST3003A Split stone manually Release: 1 CPCCST3003A Split stone manually Date this document was generated: 26 May 2012 CPCCST3003A Split stone manually Modification History Not Applicable Unit Descriptor Unit descriptor This unit specifies the outcomes required to split stone using a range of methods for both hard and soft stone. Application of the Unit Application of the unit This unit of competency supports the achievement of skills and knowledge to split stone manually, which may include working with others and as a member of a team. Licensing/Regulatory Information Not Applicable Pre-Requisites Prerequisite units CPCCOHS2001A Apply OHS requirements, policies and procedures in the construction industry Approved Page 2 of 11 © Commonwealth of Australia, 2012 Construction & Property Services Industry Skills Council CPCCST3003A Split stone manually Date this document was generated: 26 May 2012 Employability Skills Information Employability skills This unit contains employability skills. Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content Elements describe the Performance criteria describe the performance needed to essential outcomes of a demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold unit of competency. italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the required skills and knowledge section and the range statement. Assessment of performance is to be consistent with the evidence guide. Approved Page 3 of 11 © Commonwealth of Australia, 2012 Construction & Property Services Industry Skills Council CPCCST3003A Split stone manually Date this document was generated: 26 May 2012 Elements and Performance Criteria ELEMENT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 1. Plan and prepare. 1.1. Work instructions and operational details are obtained using relevant information, confirmed and applied for planning and preparation purposes.
    [Show full text]