Mexican Mafia 1 Q ___

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mexican Mafia 1 Q ___ C I FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FREEDOM OF INFORMATION/PRIVACY ACTS SECTION COVER SHEET SUBJECT: MEXICAN MAFIA 1 Q ___:. _ ~ -» . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ .. ._,_- ~/ ».. =1-.,..v_.~.-,4 .» ¢si;- ~ :..~:.=~ =~,~ . &#39;&#39; A-1. wrnnnnrunuMAY in mmon &#39;-umto "Q5 - &#39; » .&#39; .- p . jY?._§I&#39;§f&#39;§§§§_&#39;?3£ &#39; V - &#39;~"3 """" 1&#39; ~" V ~ » ; A"&#39;§ki&#39;-&#39;23.-" UNITEDS A;-I _ENT ___.,1, &#39; . ._&#39;~~ .:;%§.?.*;:§;=§§0r ¢_8_I4~_,"P_f&#39;»|92_§-> - fl v -B ¢;";;.&#39; 1&#39;/~*3 ~ *&#39;»*:..4.§.;&#39; T am .. - _,_&#39;I /:7 1 1 TO &#39; 1 =11! -__V Uh ____./J txou 4 /1" .11/14677107 _ _ &#39;_ 1 &#39; _ .I G »"-75" | /&#39;date -7% E5 B &#39; 3.,- . I "_ -" |/92,. IRBCTOR7632 FBI H2, =13, DATE;/ I mom ¢*m- _ I, s FRANCI8/C0L} 57;97 PTC3>/ 11>!54! 0r/&#39;7./*1; -<1&#39;:tzu.c,j:;/0_we$H /7I92.é/A J, -5 . -"1». ~e / // /"P 2 *»,, &#39; "-1. 1,. &#39;_ ~ f 1&#39; ~_ &#39; I &#39; &#39; 1&#39;2 &#39; /*&#39; _-M If 1, _.-IQu 1 92.1-1-_EXTRE e &#39; Eme,hp &#39;1&#39; a EmeMA TT Rs ,La Mafia afio &#39; . &#39;~" -- -~ -A &#39; - 92 - 1-. " . &#39; s &#39;.;.~ . 8 /5L2;/Z/4,2,731/73, captionedSan "EX&#39;1REMIS&#39;1 Franciscoteletype Rethe - ACTIVITIESPENAL to.Bureau NSTITUTIONS ated,v;__. .1 DISTURBANCE E.X&#39;1&#39;nm41s&#39;r AT SAN QUENTIN- PENAL PRISONINST!.;U&#39;I_.IONS 8 29-e 30 73 R Acrrvnzss :>1s&#39;ruRB2&#39;=;NcE -"_92,..<_> ZsAN_PRISON, QUENTIN 11/9-11/10/1&9?/57: /£50 4-97. /.&#39; Enclosedfor the Bureau 5 eight 8! copiesof an i &#39; -LHM._captioned as above. / / / _, and Sap, -:&#39;ll ranciscoteletype to the Bureau. 92 da ed 1l/13/ 3, captioned4 _ 4 &#39; Q .§§$* "v/Q Two ! copies o are stapled totwo 1 | ._ 92..=. 92. v i I - Of LHM.5/Y I . 5 » b2- &#39;"S6urce,v&i1izedin he"LHMbis | located Z 5, 1 "0 mo N I zishedcopies of three . A q letters former San Quentin zumabe mm?GADENA, .#A-565, former leader of the Mexican Mafia, to the representatives of the Mexican Mafia and the New Famil a Mexican-Americanmilitant revolutionary» Prison from--. CO GADENA; act I communication . Copies of the LHM are being 0 U S. Secret Service and the U. S. Attorney, _ ___ Al_1_ receiving offices will sources. atprisons &#39;1!for any adoi &#39; cerning the Mexican ! tojm ake A Mexican&#39;Ma3i&#39;af,§ ?for Q Bureau_--»_ LosAhqeles En_cs_.Lf8! Enos, V5 8 -7-Sacramento Enos; 8! - San Francisco 92 -&#39; __ _ _____ V _ M __ ____ __ _ <_.... _<..._._..__,_ ____,_... .. _ _____.i_ , _.__.____ ---_-__ W .,._ ,. , . ! , _. _ &#39; A V &#39; ¥ 1 &#39; ix J /0 .&#39; - SF 157-9754 - 1 3 . 1 information concerning the Mexican Mafia and forward same to the Bureau and offices covering prisons in California siiii Department of Corrections System. EEEE§i " LOS ANGELES . ---_.-_--Q--- Ar CINO£7CAQI§ORNIA. 1. Contact §ources at- Californiaifnstitutezfof*eI* 2. Contact sources at Southern Conservation C81&#39;1t8I. AT_CORQN§,éC§LIFQBNI§. 1. Contact sources at California InsEItsté £o£&#39;wome5. _/ 2. Contact sources at California Rehabilitation § Center. 5 at California_ §I§§§iLQIS Menfs Colon§.QEISPO. &#39; CQQIEQRNIAL_ i Contact sources 1 §§cRAMENTo .. so; Z .- AT JAMESTOWN, CALIFORNIA.Contact sourcesat lg . » 92 Sierra Con§Erv§Ei6nCén¬er.; &#39;1 Wf vs i AT LASSEN,CALIFORNIA. Contactsources at Z4- California_C5n§ervatiofCen¬erI; 92&#39; §@_$§§nCH§Pl,*C§L£FO§y;§; Contact sources at California Correctionaf Institute. §@_@RAQ§, CALIFORNIA:Contact sources at Duell Vocational fséfttei &#39;" C "fj n §£_§EPRE§SA,;CALIFQ§§IA; Contact sources at Folsom State Prison: W 7 "W _&#39; V < . AT_YAQAYI§L§, CALIFQ§§IA. Contact sources at 1 CaliforniaMe3ic5lF5cITity.j "" i ,/,. 5 / "// F a , / "2" Q -0 V 1 Y -92 _ - . "-92 r/I i _ ___ __ __,_ , . .-.. ,. - . .~, .._._ ,. _ - 4......-Y..- I : i ? _ /N3. ""~e"&#39; "> , - SF 157-9754 I J {"31 JEC/sad §AI_92}__1f_§_ANCI§§_Q_&#39; 2... F am .92 _ . 0 AT SOLEDAD,§AIF§RNIA.: Contactsources at California&#39;Tf5iniHg*Fa6iIIty. Z 4 AT TAMAL, CALIFORNIA, Maintain contact with sources at§§nQéntf §tate&#39;§fison. -,@_ m-_;-, s ! ! -.-.;-.-...-&#39;l -- .1. ....~.1;Q-1 ._. ,.n I & *5; a J,.I . i ~"~ 4&#39;5- ._,. Y I Q Q. u_ . éy / - Pr;3r&#39; 1&#39;_Q§Q§¥¥*£¥E§¥¥*%*l &#39;~ .*~S-"~""~ ¢¢.j.. v V _ __._, /l~V~|--&#39;>&#39; -v - ,.__ .. -.. t ._ _>H%-__ _ I » -- _ x Y .5, /3: J _ .-._.__z-...L.-_¥. .»-:1-:2:. _92 1 3 l - F1>:»§jf6_ Rev. 7-1->7s>_ I I - , . l &#39; C": "&#39;1 I. &#39; - &#39; I 92 "1" p/» Q ~ . l-. 7- - _ .. ..- . _.i &#39; W -"* 3 Ul &#39;ED STATES DEPARTMENT OF L ETICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION -92 In Replydqam Refer WASHINGTON, n.c. 20535 File No. » . December 7, 1973 ». United States Secret Service Department of the Treasury ;., - 92. 7* Washington. D. c. 20220 RE: MEXICAN MAFIA » ; Dear Sir: - »-.---- _ - . ._.-_. .. _ r V .2 l The information furnished herewith concerns an individual or organization beliiave S fl &#39; 5 1 responsibilities, tobe covered by and theagreement to fall within between the category the FBI or and categories Secret Service checked.concerning protective _ y 1.; | / I . .= 1. Q Threats or actions against persons protected by Secret Service- 2 &#39; ll 92 I 2- 1:] Attempts or threats to redress grievances. - ~ ~*"I . T 3. C] Threatening or abusive statement about U. S.or foreign official. I L//j, 4-. - 4- K] Participation incidentsagainst in civilforeign disturbances, diplomatic anti-U. S.establishments. demonstrations or hostile 1- 2&#39; I 5- [:1 Illegal bombing, bomb-making or other terrorist activity. 6- £3 Defector from U. S. or indicates desire to defect. &#39;[j"i>B£eiiEii§"aériéérsuébZ6ii1§e&#39;ar"i>5¢kground, 1" s=&#39;;-q,.- é&#39;motioii&#39;al:i1i§tiibility"or" " A lg; *~ .¢ activity in groups engaged in activities inimical to U. S. 92 / 92 /"- x Photograph[:1 has been furnished [jenclosed [Q is not available. i92| " Very truly yours , .- /"&#39; . // ivy ; Y / =~. &#39; Clarence M. Kelley x 1/hi " M-auroamnou conmnen &#39; °"e°°&#39;- . IQ; mamaa c smr /92; oars - BY EP/00 fv = 4419591 W5 M7 , I - Special Agent in Charge Enclosui-e1 s!! - U. S. Secret Service, San Francisco RM! ~sure 1 s! l. .92 I. _ .¢, . , J4 . , R;-/-»" &#39;92 &#39;, 92 ., _. _., -_-,..._._&#39;;..,--492-&#39;2 A 1 ¢ . ~_..¢_ .,¢...,-.. =.. 92_ 1 .1 .s..»-m~-...¢c.=¢-.~..a..»-=i.>-1.s >.. ._ ,.-.....,._...~_924>-1-villi;92I»¢t¢924i-&#39;>l92;92v<*¢~92|92ar>§I4r,n&#39;<~|¢rv~tr-rv&#39;>z92&#39;<>-&#39;pvw~i--/> W _¬_____.. I i 0%,Ili _ ~ 1 <_>r "-4 I. ! "- &#39; &#39; " ~-&#39;* ~&#39;~ ~ ~-~- ~-~-* ~~ ~ " a ~ ~-:-e»-»--<~e:-1»-=+%===.»_r,»-1-~>--.-_-_sz=92»._..;,gq,g.m ~ ,4! v 1", i Ul92 LD QTATES DEPARTMLNT OF STICE 1 I 4&#39;G15 I U 92-&#39;, O I qrQ FEDERAL BUREAUOEINVESTIGATION f- ~ San Francisco,California f &#39;v}, In Reply,Please Refertu K L; v v p kN¢ December 7, 1973 &#39; i p Am, nwomvrzo cl?" /~* MEXICAN MAFIA EmBE B 3 &#39; 1 92jiZ@p&#39;Known Also D$TEAs /bif%&;%§/ El Mafia,Eme, LaLa Eme, Mafioso, Eme_W_:i_;_i;_1__Wy!Z 1 - This investigation is based on information that the Mexican Mafia&#39;s activities may be in violation of Title l8, U. S. Code, Section 2383 Rebellion or Insurrection!, and 2 ,/Section 2384 Seditious Conspiracy!. A confidential source who has furnished reliable information in the past has r informed that the organization uses force and violence in connection with racial problems; advocates violent attacks I 2 "and disruptive activitiesagainst California Department of Corrections authority, and engages in rebellion, insurrection I and destruction at San Quentin Prison. ,= _<.-re: On November 5, 1973, a reliable source furnished _ .2:.. the following: _ California penal institutions are violently W . operatingexperiencing boththewithin powers and outsideof criminally theoriented correctional groupssystem. now "1 -Q! Individuals havegrouped themselvesinto organizations »69292y directedthat reflect prisonerattheir ethnic se1fprotectionbackground andand language control of illegal;and are ch" 1 i &#39;..92&#39;. activities within prison walls and on the streets. These _ formal tight-knit organizations are composedof convicts /31 and ex-convicts and are known tobe involved in narcotics, 1; W x extortion, contract killing, robbery, forgery and receiving. 92<;i_ 1 To be effective at self-protection, these groups must-acquire positions of power within the prison system. N &#39;Prison killings, control of narcotic traffic within the _system, crimes committed by members on the outside and the building of a strong organization on the street enables these groups to maintain a powerful position within the .92/92_.. ,. .. penal institutions. /" / _/ 92 7/92921/92;?92 » 92_ THfs"d66unéEfi66taIns ¬It¬fre6dméndEfi6ns nor c5nc1uéions&#39;l 92~/ of the FBI. _It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to 92 your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. _ -»- §N%sm____31..;1".*1/I , A_&#39;R A! l _.-7*. /92W92-.-,.-..- ...< 4&#39;, an Xl";a, _.
Recommended publications
  • Organized Crime and Terrorist Activity in Mexico, 1999-2002
    ORGANIZED CRIME AND TERRORIST ACTIVITY IN MEXICO, 1999-2002 A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the United States Government February 2003 Researcher: Ramón J. Miró Project Manager: Glenn E. Curtis Federal Research Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540−4840 Tel: 202−707−3900 Fax: 202−707−3920 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://loc.gov/rr/frd/ Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Criminal and Terrorist Activity in Mexico PREFACE This study is based on open source research into the scope of organized crime and terrorist activity in the Republic of Mexico during the period 1999 to 2002, and the extent of cooperation and possible overlap between criminal and terrorist activity in that country. The analyst examined those organized crime syndicates that direct their criminal activities at the United States, namely Mexican narcotics trafficking and human smuggling networks, as well as a range of smaller organizations that specialize in trans-border crime. The presence in Mexico of transnational criminal organizations, such as Russian and Asian organized crime, was also examined. In order to assess the extent of terrorist activity in Mexico, several of the country’s domestic guerrilla groups, as well as foreign terrorist organizations believed to have a presence in Mexico, are described. The report extensively cites from Spanish-language print media sources that contain coverage of criminal and terrorist organizations and their activities in Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • LA MAFIA 2016 La Mafia with Founding Members Oscar De La
    LA MAFIA 2016 La Mafia with founding members Oscar De La Rosa & Armando Lichtenberger Jr. started up in Houston in the early 1980s, and for more than three decades and thirty seven albums has become one of the largest and most critically-acclaimed names in Latin Music. Since the beginning, La Mafia has gained admirers worldwide thanks to a blend of Oscar De La Rosa's passionate singing and Armando Lichtenberger Jr.'s polished productions. The high level stage energy of band members David De La Garza with his famous Roland keytar, Tim Ruiz’s jazz influenced bass solos , rock solid drumming from Eduardo Torres and a touch of Rockero with guitarist Viktor Pacheco La Mafia is always a show to remember. La Mafia also set a precedent in the world of music by being one of the first Mexican-American groups to tour the US, Mexico, and Central / South America , allowing them to vastly expand their base of fans over the whole of the North American continent. Over the years, La Mafia has been praised for its versatility and willingness to explore a wide variety of styles, often blending rock, folk, reggae, and pop with traditional Latin music. Thanks to this matchless talent and the adoration of their listeners, La Mafia has been able to become a household name to generations of music lovers. Their first international release was Estas Tocando Fuego on CBS International / Sony Records in 1991, which has sold more than 4 million copies. 1993's Ahora y Siempre was certified triple platinum by the RIAA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Constitutional Analysis of the Ogden Trece Gang Injunction Megan K
    Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement Volume 2013 Article 22 2013 Removing the Presumption of Innocence: A Constitutional Analysis of the Ogden Trece Gang Injunction Megan K. Baker Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Baker, Megan K. (2013) "Removing the Presumption of Innocence: A Constitutional Analysis of the Ogden Trece Gang Injunction," Utah OnLaw: The Utah Law Review Online Supplement: Vol. 2013 , Article 22. Available at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/onlaw/vol2013/iss1/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Utah Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah OnLaw: The tU ah Law Review Online Supplement by an authorized editor of Utah Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REMOVING THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE OGDEN TRECE GANG INJUNCTION Megan K. Baker* Abstract Gang activity poses a substantial problem in many communities. The city of Ogden, Utah, is home to many gangs, and law enforcement is constantly looking for a way to decrease gang violence. In an attempt to reduce gang violence in Ogden, Judge Ernie Jones issued the Ogden Trece gang injunction on September 27, 2010, in Weber County, Utah. The injunction, based on several similar injunctions in California, affects hundreds of alleged Ogden Trece gang members and spans an area including virtually the entire city of Ogden. The injunction prohibits those enjoined from engaging in various illegal activities as well as many otherwise legal activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Conflict, Local Organizations, and Mobilizing Ethnic Violence In
    Private Conflict, Local Organizations, and Mobilizing Ethnic Violence in Southern California Bradley E. Holland∗ Abstract Prominent research highlights links between group-level conflicts and low-intensity (i.e. non-militarized) ethnic violence. However, the processes driving this relationship are often less clear. Why do certain actors attempt to mobilize ethnic violence? How are those actors able to mobilize participation in ethnic violence? I argue that addressing these questions requires scholars to focus not only on group-level conflicts and tensions, but also private conflicts and local violent organizations. Private conflicts give certain members of ethnic groups incentives to mobilize violence against certain out-group adversaries. Institutions within local violent organizations allow them to mobilize participation in such violence. Promoting these selective forms of violence against out- group adversaries mobilizes indiscriminate forms of ethnic violence due to identification problems, efforts to deny adversaries access to resources, and spirals of retribution. I develop these arguments by tracing ethnic violence between blacks and Latinos in Southern California. In efforts to gain leverage in private conflicts, a group of Latino prisoners mobilized members of local street gangs to participate in selective violence against African American adversaries. In doing so, even indiscriminate forms of ethnic violence have become entangled in the private conflicts of members of local violent organizations. ∗Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, [email protected]. Thanks to Sarah Brooks, Jorge Dominguez, Jennifer Hochschild, Didi Kuo, Steven Levitsky, Chika Ogawa, Meg Rithmire, Annie Temple, and Bernardo Zacka for comments on earlier drafts. 1 Introduction On an evening in August 1992, the homes of two African American families in the Ramona Gardens housing projects, just east of downtown Los Angeles, were firebombed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mara Salvatrucha: the Most Dangerous Gang in America
    Mara Salvatrucha: The Deadliest Street Gang in America Albert DeAmicis July 31, 2017 Independent Study LaRoche College Mara Salvatrucha: The Deadliest Street Gang in America Abstract The following paper will address the most violent gang in America: Mara Salvatrucha or MS-13. The paper will trace the gang’s inception and its development exponentially into this country. MS-13’s violence has increased ten-fold due to certain policies and laws during the Obama administration, as in areas such as Long Island, New York. Also Suffolk County which encompasses Brentwood and Central Islip and other areas in New York. Violence in these communities have really raised the awareness by the Trump administration who has declared war on MS-13. The Department of Justice under the Trump administration has lent their full support to Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE) to deport these MS-13 gang members back to their home countries such as El Salvador who has been making contingency plans to accept this large influx of deportations of MS-13 from the United States. It has been determined by Garcia of Insight.com that MS-13 has entered into an alliance with the security threat group, the Mexican Mafia or La Eme, a notorious prison gang inside the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The Mexican Drug Trafficking Organization [Knights Templar] peddles their drugs throughout a large MS-13 national network across the country. This MS-13 street gang is also attempting to move away from a loosely run clique or clikas into a more structured organization. They are currently attempting to organize the hierarchy by combining both west and east coast MS-13 gangs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report United States Department of Justice United States Attorney’S Office Central District of California
    2016 Annual Report United States Department of Justice United States Attorney’s Office Central District of California TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from U.S. Attorney Eileen M. Decker ____________________________________________________________________ 3 Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Overview of Cases ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Assaults on Federal Officers ___________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Appeals __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 Bank and Mortgage Fraud ____________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Civil Recovery _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 15 Civil Rights _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 Community Safety _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 19 Credit Fraud ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 21 Crimes and Fraud against the Government _________________________________________________________________ 22 Cyber Crimes __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 26 Defending the United States __________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • History of Gangs in the United States
    1 ❖ History of Gangs in the United States Introduction A widely respected chronicler of British crime, Luke Pike (1873), reported the first active gangs in Western civilization. While Pike documented the existence of gangs of highway robbers in England during the 17th century, it does not appear that these gangs had the features of modern-day, serious street gangs. Later in the 1600s, London was “terrorized by a series of organized gangs calling themselves the Mims, Hectors, Bugles, Dead Boys [and they] fought pitched battles among themselves dressed with colored ribbons to distinguish the different factions” (Pearson, 1983, p. 188). According to Sante (1991), the history of street gangs in the United States began with their emer- gence on the East Coast around 1783, as the American Revolution ended. These gangs emerged in rapidly growing eastern U.S. cities, out of the conditions created in large part by multiple waves of large-scale immigration and urban overcrowding. This chapter examines the emergence of gang activity in four major U.S. regions, as classified by the U.S. Census Bureau: the Northeast, Midwest, West, and South. The purpose of this regional focus is to develop a better understanding of the origins of gang activity and to examine regional migration and cultural influences on gangs themselves. Unlike the South, in the Northeast, Midwest, and West regions, major phases characterize gang emergence. Table 1.1 displays these phases. 1 2 ❖ GANGS IN AMERICA’S COMMUNITIES Table 1.1 Key Timelines in U.S. Street Gang History Northeast Region (mainly New York City) First period: 1783–1850s · The first ganglike groups emerged immediately after the American Revolution ended, in 1783, among the White European immigrants (mainly English, Germans, and Irish).
    [Show full text]
  • Susany. Soong Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern
    FILED 1 STEPHANIE M. HINDS (CABN 154284) Acting United States Attorney 2 Apr 15 2021 3 SUSANY. SOONG 4 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN FRANCISCO 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO. 3:21-cr-00153 VC ) 12 Plaintiff, ) VIOLATIONS: ) 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(j)(1) and 2 – Use of a Firearm in 13 v. ) Furtherance of a Crime of Violence Resulting in ) Death; 14 JONATHAN ESCOBAR, ) 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A) and 2 – Use/Carrying of a a/k/a “Wicked,” a/k/a “Rico,” and ) Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of 15 JOSE AGUILAR, ) Violence; a/k/a “Slim” ) 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) – 16 ) Forfeiture Allegation Defendants. ) 17 ) SAN FRANCISCO VENUE ) 18 ) UNDER SEAL ) 19 20 I N D I C T M E N T 21 The Grand Jury charges, with all dates being approximate and all date ranges being both 22 approximate and inclusive, and at all times relevant to this Indictment: 23 Introductory Allegations 24 1. The 19th Street Sureños gang was a predominantly Hispanic street gang that claimed the 25 area centered around 19th Street and Mission Street, in the Mission District of San Francisco, as its 26 territory or “turf.” The claimed territory included the area bounded by 19th Street to the South, 16th 27 Street to the North, Folsom Street to the East, and Dolores Street to the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Cdcr Recognized Disruptive Groups June 5, 2012
    CDCR RECOGNIZED DISRUPTIVE GROUPS JUNE 5, 2012 GANG NAMES 17TH ST ROAD KINGS ACORN MOB AKRHO BOYS CRAZZYS AMNI ANOTHER ORDER ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD ARMENIAN POWER ARYAN BROTHERHOOD - FEDERAL SYSTEM ARYAN BROTHERHOOD OF TEXAS ARYAN NATION ARYAN WARRIORS ASAIN-MASTERS OF DESTRUCTION ASIAN CRIPS ASIAN-AMERICAN BORN IN CHINA ASIAN-ASIAN BOYS ASIAN-ASIAN MAFIA ASSASSIN ASIAN-ASIAN PERSUASION ASIAN-BAHALA-NA GANG ASIAN-HOP SING BOYS ASIAN-JACKSON ST BOYS ASIAN-KING COBRAS ASIAN-KOREAN COBRA BOYS ASIAN-MABUHAY PINOY ASIAN-MONGOLIAN BOYS SOCIETY ASIAN-NINJA CLAN ASSASSINS ASIAN-NON SPECIFIC ASIAN-ORIENTAL BOYS ASIAN-ORIENTAL LAZY BOYS ASIAN-ORIENTAL MOB ASIAN-ORIENTAL TROOP W/S ASIAN-ORIENTAL TROOPS ASIAN-PINOY REAL ASIAN-SONS OF DEVIL ASIAN-SONS OF SAMOA [SF] ASIAN-SONS OF SOMOA [LONG BEACH] ASIAN-V BOYS ASIAN-VIET CHING ASIAN-VIETNAMESE BOYS ASIAN-VIETNAMESE GANGSTER FAMILY ASIAN-VIETNAMESE NATOMA BOYS CDCR RECOGNIZED DISRUPTIVE GROUPS JUNE 5, 2012 ASIAN-WAH CHING ASIAN-WO HOP TO ATWOOD BABY BLUE WRECKING CREW BARBARIAN BROTHERHOOD BARHOPPERS M.C.C. BELL GARDENS WHITE BOYS BLACK DIAMONDS BLACK GANGSTER DISCIPLE BLACK GANGSTER DISCIPLES NATION BLACK GANGSTERS BLACK INLAND EMPIRE MOB BLACK MENACE MAFIA BLACK P STONE RANGER BLACK PANTHERS BLACK-NON SPECIFIC BLOOD-21 MAIN BLOOD-916 BLOOD-ATHENS PARK BOYS BLOOD-B DOWN BOYS BLOOD-BISHOP 9/2 BLOOD-BISHOPS BLOOD-BLACK P-STONE BLOOD-BLOOD STONE VILLAIN BLOOD-BOULEVARD BOYS BLOOD-BOUNTY HUNTER BLOOD-BOUNTY HUNTER [LOT BOYS] BLOOD-BOUNTY HUNTER-BELHAVEN BLOOD-BOUNTY HUNTER-INCKERSON GARDENS BLOOD-BOUNTY HUNTER-NICKERSON
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of STREET GANGS in the UNITED STATES By: James C
    Bureau of Justice Assistance U.S. Department of Justice NATIO N AL GA ng CE N TER BULLETI N No. 4 May 2010 HISTORY OF STREET GANGS IN THE UNITED STATES By: James C. Howell and John P. Moore Introduction The first active gangs in Western civilization were reported characteristics of gangs in their respective regions. by Pike (1873, pp. 276–277), a widely respected chronicler Therefore, an understanding of regional influences of British crime. He documented the existence of gangs of should help illuminate key features of gangs that operate highway robbers in England during the 17th century, and in these particular areas of the United States. he speculates that similar gangs might well have existed in our mother country much earlier, perhaps as early as Gang emergence in the Northeast and Midwest was the 14th or even the 12th century. But it does not appear fueled by immigration and poverty, first by two waves that these gangs had the features of modern-day, serious of poor, largely white families from Europe. Seeking a street gangs.1 More structured gangs did not appear better life, the early immigrant groups mainly settled in until the early 1600s, when London was “terrorized by a urban areas and formed communities to join each other series of organized gangs calling themselves the Mims, in the economic struggle. Unfortunately, they had few Hectors, Bugles, Dead Boys … who found amusement in marketable skills. Difficulties in finding work and a place breaking windows, [and] demolishing taverns, [and they] to live and adjusting to urban life were equally common also fought pitched battles among themselves dressed among the European immigrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Gang Recognition Guide
    Gang Recognition Guide As gangs become an increasing issue in our society, education is the key to recognizing their activity and understanding what they are about. However, when discussing gangs, a working defi nition must be developed. Gangs are three or more individuals, using the same name, sign or symbol who commit criminal acts individually or as a group to further their agenda. The following information is not exhaustive in describing gangs and their background, but is a basic framework to educate concerned community members. Crips: This street gang originally started in South Central Los Angeles in the 1960’s. Stanley “Tookie” Williams met with Raymond Lee Washington to unite local gang members to battle neighboring street gangs. Today, the Crips are one of the largest and most violent gangs, involved in murders, robberies, drug dealing and many other criminal pursuits. Crips identify with the color blue. Their biggest rivals are the Bloods and disrespect in many ways - calling them “slobs”. Crips call themselves “Blood Killas” and cross the letter “b” out or leave it off altogether. Crips do not use the letters “ck” as it denotes “Crip Killer” and substitute it for “cc” (as in “kicc” for “kick”). While traditionally African-American, today’s Crip membership are multi-ethnic. Bloods: The Bloods were formed to compete against the Crips. Their origins stem from a Piru street gang (initially a Crip set) who broke away during an internal gang war and allied with other smaller street gangs to form the present day Bloods. Since the Bloods were originally outnumbered 3 to 1 by the Crips, they had to be more violent.
    [Show full text]
  • Slide 1 Gang Awareness ______Supervising Gang Members in Rural ______Communities by Brian Parry ______
    Slide 1 Gang Awareness ___________________________________ Supervising Gang Members In Rural ___________________________________ Communities By Brian Parry ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 2 ___________________________________ Training Objectives ___________________________________ • Identify scope of problem • Gang definitions and level of involvement ___________________________________ • Types of gangs • Characteristics and methods of ___________________________________ identification • Safety and supervision issues ___________________________________ • Collaboration and partnerships ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 3 ___________________________________ Gang Perspectives ___________________________________ • Every instructor has a different perspective • 34 years of practical experience ___________________________________ • National perspective (NMGTF) • California gangs ___________________________________ • Professional organizations ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 4 ___________________________________ Collaborative Approach ___________________________________ • Societal problem • Requires collaborative effort ___________________________________ • Law enforcement/courts • Corrections ___________________________________ • Communities/schools/faith based groups
    [Show full text]