DOCSLIB.ORG

The Triune God As Similarity in Difference: an Engagement with Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutical Detour JH Ahn Orcid.Org / 0000-00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Triune God As Similarity in Difference: an Engagement with Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutical Detour JH Ahn Orcid.Org / 0000-00 The Triune God as similarity in difference: An engagement with Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutical detour JH Ahn orcid.org / 0000-0002-0574-3183 Thesis accepted for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Dogmatics at the North-West University Promoter: Prof S Van Der Walt Graduation: May 2020 Student number: 28883179 Acknowledgments The last moment of the long journey to the Triune God probably should inevitably end with Augustine’s confession: “I [Augustine] confess rather that the highest Trinity’s sublime knowledge has been too great for me, and that I am unable to reach to it” (Ps 138:6) (De Trin. 15.27.50). I also praise the Holy Triune God: “Praise ye the LORD. Praise the LORD, O my soul” (Ps 146:1). I would like to express my gratitude to my promoter Prof. Sarel Van Der Walt who gave me guidance and advice as well as encouragement. I would also like to give thanks to Prof. Hae Moo Yoo. Through him, I gained trinitarian perspectives for theology. I would like to express my special gratitude to my wife Hyo Jung Lee and my lovely children; Dong Eun, Si Eun, Cho Eun. I want to dedicate this thesis to my family. I Abstract The aim of this study is to apply Ricoeur’s (1913-2005) philosophical hermeneutics to the doctrine of the Trinity and to move and expand the doctrine from the notional sphere to the pragmatic field through trinitarian hermeneutics. The basic structure of this thesis is constituted by interaction between three fields: Ricoeur’s hermeneutical detour (symbols, metaphors, and narratives), doctrine of the Trinity (the analogical, the immanent, and the economical Trinity) and biblical texts. This dialectic process is accomplished by the notion of resemblance, in other words, similarity in difference. Through synthesis of the interaction, this thesis promotes the realization that the Triune God is not only the purpose of interpretation, but is also the route of interpretation. Key words – The Trinity, Paul Ricoeur, hermeneutics, Trinitarian hermeneutics, hermeneutical detour, symbol, metaphor, narrative, similarity in difference, relationship between hermeneutics and the Trinity, Biblical interpretation. II Table of Contents Brief Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM STATEMENT 1.2 AIM & OBJECTIVES 1.3 CENTRAL THEORETICAL ARGUMENT 1.4 METHODOLOGY CHAPTER 2. RICOEUR’S PHILOSOPHY AND HERMENEUTICAL DETOUR 2.1 RICOEUR’S LIFE AND HIS WORKS 2.2 HERMENEUTICAL DETOUR 2.3 SIMILARITY IN DIFFERENCE 2.4 HERMENEUTICAL APPROACHES TO THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY 2.5 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 3 SYMBOLS AND THE ANALOGICAL TRINITY 3.1 SYMBOLISM OF RICOEUR 3.2 THE TRINITY AND SYMBOLISM 3.3 TRINITARIAN SYMBOLS IN SCRIPTURE 3.4 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 4 METAPHORS AND THE IMMANENT TRINITY 4.1 RICOEUR’S THEORY OF METAPHOR 4.2 THE IMMANENT TRINITY 4.3 TRINITARIAN METAPHORS IN SCRIPTURE 4.4 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 5 NARRATIVES AND THE ECONOMICAL TRINITY 5.1 RICOEUR’S NARRATIVE THEORY 5.2 THE ECONOMIC TRINITY 5.3 TRINITARIAN NARRATIVE IN SCRIPTURE III 5.4 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 6 RICOEUR’S BIBLILCAL HERMENEUTICS AND TRINITARIAN HERMENEUTICS 6.1 RICOEUR’S BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS 6.2 TRINITARIAN HERMENEUTICS 6.3 THE INTEGRATION BETWEEN RICOEUR’S HERMENEUTICS AND THE TRINITARIAN HERMENEUTICS 6.4 THE TRIUNE GOD AS THE PRIME PRINCIPLE OF BIBLICAL HERMENEUTICS 6.5 CONCLUSION CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION BIBLIOGRAPHY IV Full Table of Contents Abstract ························································································································· I Table of Contents ············································································································ III Brief Table of Contents ····································································································· III Full Table of Contents ······································································································· V Abbreviations ················································································································· X Chapter 1 Introduction ······································································································ 1 1.1 Background and problem statement ·················································································· 1 1.1.1 Background ············································································································ 1 1.1.2 Problem statement ···································································································· 2 1.2 Aim & Objectives ········································································································· 5 1.2.1 The aim ················································································································ 5 1.2.2 Objectives ············································································································· 5 1.3 Central theoretical argument ·························································································· 6 1.4 Methodology ··············································································································· 6 1.4.1 The hermeneutical detour and the Trinity ········································································· 7 1.4.2 Symbolism and the analogical Trinity ············································································· 7 1.4.3 Metaphor and the immanent Trinity ················································································ 8 1.4.4 Narrative and the economic Trinity ················································································ 8 1.4.5 The Trinity as similarity in difference and as the route of interpretation of Scripture ······················· 8 Chapter 2. Ricoeur’s philosophy and hermeneutical detour ······················································· 10 2.1 Ricoeur’s life and his works ·························································································· 10 2.2 Hermeneutical detour ·································································································· 17 2.3 Similarity in difference ································································································ 22 2.4 Hermeneutical approaches to the doctrine of the Trinity ······················································· 25 2.5 Conclusion ··············································································································· 29 Chapter 3 Symbols and the analogical Trinity ········································································ 32 3.1 Symbolism of Ricoeur·································································································· 32 3.1.1 General symbolism ································································································· 33 V 3.1.1.1 Definition of symbol ·························································································· 33 3.1.1.2 The proper place of interpretation of symbols ····························································· 38 3.1.1.3 Reflection and symbol ························································································ 40 3.1.2 Symbol and interpretation ························································································· 41 3.1.2.1 Symbol and analogy ·························································································· 42 3.1.3 Symbolism of evil ·································································································· 44 3.1.3.1 Primary symbol for evil as defilement ····································································· 44 3.1.3.2 The second symbol for evil as the myth ···································································· 45 3.1.4 Summary············································································································· 48 3.2 The Trinity and symbolism ··························································································· 49 3.2.1 Augustine of Hippo (354 ~ 430) ·················································································· 50 3.2.2. Karl Barth (1886~1968) ·························································································· 53 3.2.3. Kevin Vanhoozer (1957~ ) ························································································ 54 3.2.4 Paul Tillich (1886 ~ 1965) ······················································································· 57 3.2.5 Karl Rahner (1904 - 1984) ······················································································· 60 3.2.6 John Zizioulas (b. 1931-) ·························································································· 61 3.2.6 Summary············································································································· 62 3.3 Trinitarian symbols in Scripture····················································································· 63 3.3.1 The Father in the trinitarian symbol ·············································································· 63 3.3.2 The Son as trinitarian symbol ····················································································· 65 3.3.3 The Spirit as trinitarian symbol ··················································································· 67 3.3.4 Summary·············································································································
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HERMENEUTICAL CRITICISMS: by Mark E
    Issues of Interpretation Ozark Christian College, GB 216-2 Professor Mark E. Moore, Ph.D. Table of Contents: 1. Hermeneutical Constructs .......................................................................................................2 2. A Chart of the History of Hermeneutics .................................................................................5 3. History of Interpretation .........................................................................................................7 4. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, 1.1.10.......................................................................29 5. Allegory of 153 Fish, Jn 21:11 .............................................................................................30 6. How the Holy Spirit Helps in Interpretation .........................................................................31 7. Problem Passages ..................................................................................................................32 8. Principles for Dealing with Problem Passages .....................................................................33 9. Cultural vs. Universal ...........................................................................................................34 10. Hermeneutical Constructs .....................................................................................................36 11. Hermeneutical Shifts .............................................................................................................38 12. Hermeneutical Constructs:
    [Show full text]
  • The Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8)
    The Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8) The so-called Johannine Comma (also called the Comma Johanneum) is a sequence of extra words which appear in 1 John 5:7-8 in some early printed editions of the Greek New Testament. In these editions the verses appear thus (we put backets around the extra words): ὅτι τρεῖς εἰσιν οἱ μαρτυροῦντες [ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ, ὁ Πατήρ, ὁ Λόγος, καὶ τὸ Ἅγιον Πνεῦμα· καὶ οὗτοι οἱ τρεῖς ἔν εἰσι. 8 καὶ τρεῖς εἰσιν οἱ μαρτυροῦντες ἐν τῇ γῇ] τὸ πνεῦμα καὶ τὸ ὕδωρ καὶ τὸ αἷμα, καὶ οἱ τρεῖς εἰς τὸ ἕν εἰσιν. The King James Version, which was based upon these editions, gives the following translation: For there are three that bear record [in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 8 And there are three that bear witness in earth], the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. These extra words are generally absent from the Greek manuscripts. In fact, they only appear in the text of four late medieval manuscripts. They seem to have originated as a marginal note added to certain Latin manuscripts during the middle ages, which was eventually incorporated into the text of most of the later Vulgate manuscripts. In the Clementine edition of the Vulgate the verses were printed thus: Quoniam tres sunt, qui testimonium dant [in caelo: Pater, Verbum, et Spiritus Sanctus: et hi tres unum sunt. 8 Et tres sunt, qui testimonium dant in terra:] spiritus, et aqua, et sanguis: et hi tres unum sunt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ineffectiveness of Hermeneutics. Another Augustine's Legacy In
    The ineffectiveness of hermeneutics. Another Augustine’s legacy in Gadamer Alberto Romele To cite this version: Alberto Romele. The ineffectiveness of hermeneutics. Another Augustine’s legacy in Gadamer. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, Taylor & Francis, 2015, 75 (5), pp.422-439. 10.1080/21692327.2015.1027789. hal-01303281 HAL Id: hal-01303281 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01303281 Submitted on 17 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Ineffectiveness of Hermeneutics. Another Augustine’s Legacy in Gadamer Alberto Romele Institute of Philosophy, University of Porto COSTECH Laboratory, University of Technology of Compiègne This article builds on Gadamer’s rehabilitation of the Augustinian concept of inner word (ver- bum in corde). Unlike most interpretions, the thesis is that the Augustinian inner word does not show the potentialities, but rather the ineffectiveness of ontological hermeneutics. In the first section, it is argued that for the later Augustine the verbum in corde is the consequence of a Word- and Truth- event. In the second section, the author suggests that Gadamer has properly understood the verbum in corde as a matter of faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Texts and English Translations of the Bible: A
    GREEK TEXTS AND ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS OF THE BIBLE: A COMPARISON AND CONTRAST OF THE TEXTUS RECEPTUS GREEK NEW TESTAMENT OF THE 16th CENTURY AND THE ALEXANDRIAN TEXT OF WESTCOTT AND HORT (19th CENTURY) AND ALAND AND METZGER (20th CENTURY) CONCERNING VARIANT TEXTS THAT PERTAIN TO THE ORTHODOX CHRISTOLOGY OF THE COUNCIL OF NICEA, A.D. 325 Gil L. Samples, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2002 APPROVED: Laura I. Stern, Major Professor Harold Tanner, Chair of the Department of History Henry Eaton, Committee Member Adrian R. Lewis, Committee Member C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Samples, Gil L. Greek texts and English translations of the Bible: a comparison and contrast of the Textus Receptus Greek New Testament of the 16th century and the Alexandrian text of Westcott and Hort (19th century) and Aland and Metzger (20th century) concerning variant texts that pertain to the orthodox Christology of the Council of Nicea, A.D. 325. Master of Arts (History), December 2002, 155 pp., 149 titles. The argument of this paper is that certain salient passages in the New Testament concerning Christology, as it was defined in the Nicene creed in A.D. 325, reflect such orthodoxy better in the Textus Receptus Greek texts and the English translations made from them than do the Alexandrian texts. Arian theology, which was condemned as heretical at Nicea, is examined. Patristic quotations, historical texts, and arguments of the scholars are cited and traced, along with a comparison of Christological verses.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Renaissance and Reformation Biblical Studies, 1987)
    Hills Revisited By Jon Whitmer [Jon Whitmer is an extraordinarily able young man. After reading Kutilek’s “anger venting fest” I found the task of replying to his rage a thoroughly disagreeable task. I asked Jon if he would take up the duty and he complied in a wonderful fashion. Just a sidelight on what is the otherwise inexplicable carelessness and sophomoric content found in Kutilek’s remarks. The reader would do well to remember that Edward Freer Hills had an earned doctorate in N.T. text criticism from Harvard University and that his dissertation was approved by one of the most highly celebrated N.T. text critics in the first half of the 20th century, Kirsopp Lake. Moreover, three essays from this dissertation appeared in the Journal of Biblical Literature. Kutilek has never had anything published in the JBL. He has never had anything published in any peer- reviewed journal that I know of. Also he has no higher degree from any accredited institution of higher learning that I know of, much less a degree in text criticism. Finally, the real cause for this animus of his is found in the fact that he was fired from Baptist Bible College in Springfield, Missouri because he did not see eye to eye with the administration in their choice to hold to the textus receptus and the Authorized Version. Solventur risu tabulae, Horace. Theodore P. Letis, Ph.D.] This is an analysis of “Notes and Criticisms on Theodore P. Letis' Book, Edward Freer Hill's Contribution to the Revival of the Ecclesiastical Text” found at http://www.kjvonly.org/doug/notes_theodore_letis_book.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 2 .............................................................. new releases 26 ........................................................... biblical studies 31 ..................................................... theology and doctrine 34 ................................................. apologetics and worldview 37 ............................................................. church history 44 ............................................................ baptist studies 46 ............................................................. hermeneutics 48 ................................................................. homiletics 51 ............................................ church leadership and ministry 54 ..................................................................... bibles 64 ................................................................. reference 69 .................................................. evangelism and missions 70 ................................................. christian higher education NEW RELEASES NEW RELEASES Theology, Church, and Ministry Pastoral Ministry A Handbook for Theological Education The Ministry of a Shepherd, Volume 1 in A Treasury of Baptist Theology Series EDITED BY DAVID S. DOCKERY EDITED BY DERON J. BILES We live in a precarious time when many are questioning the “So he shepherded them according to the integrity of his heart, and guided necessity of formal theological education for ministers. Theology, them by the skillfulness of his hands.” —Psalm 78:72 Church, and Ministry:
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Survey of Hermeneutics and Homiletics: a Summative Paper
    HISTORICAL SURVEY OF HERMENEUTICS AND HOMILETICS: A SUMMATIVE PAPER by Charles E. Handren B.A., California Baptist University, 1995 M.Div., American Baptist Seminary of the West, 1999 A POST-COURSE ASSIGNMENT FOR MN 9101-01 HISTORICAL SURVEY OF HERMENEUTICS AND HOMILETICS Submitted to the faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF MINISTRY Concentration in Preaching at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School Deerfield, Illinois June, 2013 HISTORICAL SURVEY OF HERMENEUTICS AND HOMILETICS: A SUMMATIVE PAPER In the spring of 2011, I took a Doctor of Ministry course at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School entitled, “Hermeneutics and Homiletics.” One of the required readings was Dennis Johnson’s fine work, Him We Proclaim: Preaching Christ from all the Scriptures. Part one of this book, and particularly chapter four, provides an overview of the history of hermeneutics and homiletics which both aided my understanding of the subject and exposed a significant gap in my knowledge. Specifically, Johnson helped me to see how little I knew about the interpretation and proclamation of the Bible over the last twenty centuries, and how significant a bearing this history has on current issues and debates. Since my Doctor of Ministry concentration is preaching, I thought this gap unacceptable and thus requested an independent reading course which was eventually entitled, “Historical Survey of Hermeneutics and Homiletics.” I set two objectives for the course. First, I aimed to develop a broad and general understanding of the history of the relationship between hermeneutics and homiletics in the Christian church. I have fulfilled this aim by reading a little over five-thousand pages of secondary material, and by building a basic mental framework which now needs to be clarified, strengthened, and built out.
    [Show full text]
  • Bellum in Stellas
    Jeffries 1 The Johannine Comma and Its Place in LDS Thought Bridget Jack Jeffries1 Isaac Newton, who was interested in the Bible2 and wrote more theological works than he did scientific,3 once stated famously, “Let them make good sense of it who are able; for my part I can make none.”4 In context, “it” refers to a passage in the First Epistle of John that has become known as the Johannine Comma. The King James Version of this passage reads: For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost; and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.5 The italicized section makes up the questionable Johannine Comma, which most modern editions of the text have either relegated to a footnote or omitted entirely.6 The Comma contains obvious and controversial Trinitarian implications and opinions on it have varied fiercely. Some have hailed the text as “the Bible’s central Trinitarian passage,”7 while others assert that the Comma is “a small affirmation of Joseph Smith 1 The original version of this paper was completed and turned in on 17 April, 2003 for Dr. Eric Huntsman’s Greek 411R (Johannine Writings) class at Brigham Young University, Provo. Minor changes have been made to the paper since then. A shortened version of the paper was presented at the 2004 BYU Humanities Symposium in March. 2 Raymond E. Brown, The Epistles of John (New York: Doubleday, 1982), 775.
    [Show full text]
  • The Task of Hermeneutics in Ancient Philosophy in This Chapter, I Would
    The Task of Hermeneutics in Ancient Philosophy [Paru dans Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy (8), 1994, 211- 230] In this chapter, I would like to identify the sources of hermeneutic thinking in ancient philosophy. Nevertheless, one might justifiably question whether or not there was such a thing as "hermeneutics" in the ancient world? Indeed, the latin word hermeneutica did not emerge until the 17th century when it was first introduced by a theologian from Strasbourg, Johann Dannhauer, as a necessary requirement of all the sciences that rely on the interpretation of texts - an understandable demand in light of the fact that the Renaissance sought fresh avenues of wisdom in returning to the classical texts.1 When Dannhauer created the word hermeneutica, he openly drew his inspiration from Aristotle's treatise Peri hermeneias (De interpretatione), claiming that the new science of interpretation was in effect nothing but a complement to the Aristotelian Organon.2 However, the first real historian of the hermeneutic tradition, Wilhelm Dilthey, proclaimed that hermeneutics was in fact created a century earlier by protestantism3 in the wake of Luther's principle of the sola scriptura. This principle, which had been used to undermine the authority of tradition advocated by the Catholic Church, was to be the one and only norm of Biblical exegesis. Following Dilthey's lead, many prominent historians of hermeneutics, such as Bultmann, Ebeling and Gadamer have paid great attention to Luther's hermeneutic revolution. However, even if Luther launched a hermeneutic revolution in the history of the Church, one would be hard-pressed to find in his own writings anything like a hermeneutics (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward F. Hills Preface
    ______________ The King James Version Defended ______________ EDWARD F. HILLS PREFACE If, indeed, we are in the midst of "a revival of the almost century-old view of J.W. Burgon" (Eldon Jay Epp, "New Testament Textual Criticism in America: Requiem for a Discipline," Journal of Biblical Literature 98 [March 1979]: 94-98.), the question naturally arises: How did such a development come to pass? Our answer in a large measure is to be found at the doorstep of Edward F. Hills (1912-1981), in his comprehensive work The King James Version Defended: A Christian View of the New Testament Manuscripts (1956). This publication was, in its day, an indication to the established school of New Testament text criticism that Burgon was not without an advocate from within its own ranks, even if such a position were only to be regarded as an anomaly (v. Bruce M. Metzger, The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration [1968], p. 136 n. l; J. Harold Greenlee, Introduction to New Testament Textual Criticism [1964], p. 82 n. 2). Recently, however, his contribution has brought new entrants into the textual arena who have followed his lead (if not his entire methodology) and thus have opened for fresh debate a forum for the defense of the Byzantine text. Hills lived to see this gratifying development, noting thankfully that his work was finally being seen by some as more than just a "scholarly curiosity" (a la Greenlee op. cit.). On the contrary, he will now be regarded as the Father of this 20th century revival of the Majority Text.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermeneutics: Aims, Scope, and Provisional Definition
    SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY HERMENEUTICS: AN EXAMINATION OF ITS AIMS AND SCOPE, WITH A PROVISIONAL DEFINITION SUBMITTED TO DR. ANDREAS KÖSTENBERGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF: PHD 9201 READING SEMINAR 2 BY NOAH W. KELLEY FEBRUARY 27, 2015 HERMENEUTICS: AN EXAMINATION OF ITS AIMS AND SCOPE, WITH A PROVISIONAL DEFINITION Introduction The topic of hermeneutics is not something that most people think about, even though they are engaging in it all the time. While a common sense approach might overlook the necessity of studying hermeneutics because of the assumption that words “simply mean what they say,” in reality the process of interpretation is much more complicated than most people recognize. This is much more the case when what is being interpreted is God’s message to us in the Scriptures. There are many intelligent people both inside and outside the church saying radically different things about the hermeneutical process. How should we adjudicate between these various theories of interpretation? In order to answer this question, it is important to understand what hermeneutics is “about.” This paper will seek to explain hermeneutics in terms of its aims and scope, or in other words, the goal and subject matter for which the discipline of hermeneutics exists. It will posit that hermeneutics has as its subject matter all of the elements that make up the communicative act, including authors, texts, and readers. The goal of hermeneutics is consequently to understand both the practice of interpretation as well as the theory behind it. The first section of this paper will describe the importance of the author, text, and reader in hermeneutics.
    [Show full text]
  • The KJV Controversy and Its Impact on Prophetical Studies Paul R. Wild, March 10, 2020
    The KJV Controversy and Its Impact on Prophetical Studies Paul R. Wild, March 10, 2020 Before we launch into a new series on Daniel 7, I feel that some ground rules need to be laid, at least ones that I feel compelled to follow. It is not impossible but is more difficult to explore Bible prophecy and doctrine in general if multiple Bible versions are consulted, because terms may differ between them and, in some cases, later versions do not possess certain verses and passages that the King James Version (KJV) possesses. For this reason and many others, I advocate using only the KJV. Unfortunately, the KJV has been under non-stop assault since 1881. British Anglican theologians by the name of Westcott and Hort - both of them as lost as geese - stated that they only wanted to update the KJV with modern language, but what they actually did was to fool the Anglican church hierarchy and supplanted the Greek text that the KJV is based on with older, corrupt Greek texts that now form the basis of modern Bible versions. At the end of this treatise I will provide a few side by side comparisons of the KJV wording to the wordings of later versions so that readers can see for themselves the degradation of basic doctrines in the later versions. In recent days, I watched a YouTube video where a scholarly type was asked by the channel host which version of the Bible is the best. Although he was respectful toward the KJV, the scholar inevitably brought up the “older and better Greek texts” argument to support modern versions, such as the Revised Standard Version (RSV), the New American Standard Bible (NASB), the New International Version (NIV), the English Standard Version (ESV), etc.
    [Show full text]