DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Passenger Duty: Implications for Northern Ireland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Passenger Duty: Implications for Northern Ireland House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Air Passenger Duty: implications for Northern Ireland Second Report of Session 2010–12 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 5 July 2011 HC 1227 Published on 8 July 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Northern Ireland Office (but excluding individual cases and advice given by the Crown Solicitor); and other matters within the responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (but excluding the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Northern Ireland and the drafting of legislation by the Office of the Legislative Counsel). Current membership Mr Laurence Robertson MP (Conservative, Tewkesbury) (Chair) Mr Joe Benton MP (Labour, Bootle) Oliver Colvile MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) Mr Stephen Hepburn MP (Labour, Jarrow) Lady Hermon MP (Independent, North Down) Kate Hoey MP (Labour, Vauxhall) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Naomi Long MP (Alliance, Belfast East) Jack Lopresti MP (Conservative, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Dr Alasdair McDonnell MP (SDLP, Belfast South) Ian Paisley MP (DUP, North Antrim) David Simpson MP (DUP, Upper Bann) Mel Stride MP (Conservative, Central Devon) Gavin Williamson MP (Conservative, South Staffordshire) The following Member was also a member of the Committee during the Parliament: Stephen Pound MP (Labour, Ealing North) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/niacom. Current Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Mike Clark (Clerk), Duma Langton (Inquiry Manager), James Bowman (Senior Committee Assistant), Becky Crew (Committee Assistant), Karen Watling (Committee Assistant), Becky Jones (Media Officer) and Ravi Abhayaratne (Committee Support Assistant). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 2173/1341; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Air Passenger Duty: implications for Northern Ireland 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 2 The significance for Northern Ireland 6 The UK rate of APD 6 3 Resolving the problem? 9 Devolving responsibility for APD to Northern Ireland? 9 Abolishing APD in the UK? 9 Is Northern Ireland a special case? 10 How to mitigate the impact of APD on Northern Ireland 11 Conclusion 12 Annex 13 The Dutch experience 13 Conclusions and recommendations 15 Formal Minutes 16 Witnesses 18 List of printed written evidence 18 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 19 2 Air Passenger Duty: implications for Northern Ireland Air Passenger Duty: implications for Northern Ireland 3 Summary There is little doubt in our mind that the opportunities to expand Northern Ireland’s economy through exports and tourism are being threatened by the continuation of Air Passenger Duty (APD). We recognise that for many people in Northern Ireland travelling by air is not a luxury, but is an essential element of family and economic life. Arguments similar to those we heard advanced during our inquiry into Corporation Tax were again to the fore: Northern Ireland was unique because, as part of the UK, it had the highest rate of aviation duty in Europe but, unlike Great Britain, it shared a land border with another EU state which levied aviation duty at a minimal rate, and even that minimal amount was soon to be abolished entirely. It may well be that, sometime in the future, setting the rate of APD could be devolved to the Northern Ireland Executive; but that would be a long-drawn out process, and Government action is needed now. Continental Airlines’ transatlantic route from Belfast to Newark is under threat, and could be withdrawn in a year or so. After all, why travel from Belfast International when you could take the short journey to Dublin and pay £60 per person less for your ticket? As we say in Paragraph 9 of our Report, this point seems to have been conceded by the Chancellor of the Exchequer himself. As far as we are concerned, and assuming that APD is not abolished for the whole of the UK, there is only one solution – abolish APD on all flights departing Northern Ireland’s airports and likewise abolish APD on direct flights into Northern Ireland from Great Britain. In that way, Northern Ireland’s business, enterprise and tourist industry stands a chance of being able to compete with the Republic of Ireland. Air Passenger Duty: implications for Northern Ireland 5 1 Introduction 1. On 23 March 2011, in a Press Release entitled Reform of air passenger duty, HM Treasury announced that: At the June 2010 Budget the Government undertook to explore changes to aviation tax, including switching from a per-passenger to a per-plane duty. Budget 2011 announced that the Government will not proceed with a per-plane duty but will work with our international partners to build consensus for this approach in the future. The Budget also launched a consultation on reform of air passenger duty (APD).1 The consultation document sets out the Government’s proposals for reform of the current APD banding system and plans to extend APD to passengers aboard ‘business jets’ for the first time .... Other issues covered in the consultation include APD in relation to: ‘premium economy’ passengers; regional impacts; and devolution for Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. 2. APD, the duty charged on a per-passenger basis on flights departing UK airports, was introduced in the UK in 1994 as a way of raising revenue. As the Environmental Audit Committee states in its Sixth Report of this Session: Environmental objectives were not part of the rationale for the tax’s introduction. However, in 2009 rates were re-structured around four distance bands ‘as an effective way of reducing emissions from aviation’, aiming for those that travel further ‘and have a larger environmental impact [to] meet the cost’. There has been much criticism of the bandings for not reflecting the actual flight distance, and even taxing some shorter journeys more than longer ones. 2 3. The other EU countries currently imposing a duty on air travel are the Republic of Ireland, Germany, Austria and France, whereas the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Malta have abolished their air passenger taxes already and the Republic of Ireland has announced that its Air Travel Tax (ATT) will be abolished as part of a raft of measures being introduced to, for example, further encourage tourism. 1 Reform of Air Passenger Duty: a consultation. The consultation period closed on 17 June 2011. 2 Sixth Report from the Environmental Audit Committee, Budget 2011 and environmental taxes, HC 878, para. 49. 6 Air Passenger Duty: implications for Northern Ireland 2 The significance for Northern Ireland 4. APD has particular significance for Northern Ireland as the CBI points out in its written submission: Northern Ireland is geographically isolated from the rest of the UK, meaning that as a region it is particularly dependent on strong air transport links, Air Passenger Duty poses a very specific challenge to Northern Ireland’s economic development. Viable alternatives to air travel to and from other regions in GB, by way or rail or road, are not available to travellers. While sea routes form an important part of the economic life of the province, they cannot provide the same speed and frequency of access.3 5. This Committee had earlier identified the importance of APD for Northern Ireland; in its First Report of Session 2010–12, we commented that: Another matter which puts Northern Ireland at a disadvantage is Air Passenger Duty. The one direct transatlantic flight from Belfast to the US, carrying 100,000 passengers a year to New York is currently at risk due to increases in the Air Passenger Duty — adding near £60 per passenger to the US compared to €3 rate in the Republic, although recent reports indicate that the Irish Government is preparing to scrap even this small amount as part of a package of measures being introduced to encourage tourists to the Republic. The service was referred to by one of our witnesses, NYSE Technologies, as a factor important to their location in Northern Ireland. If Belfast and Northern Ireland are going to compete with Dublin and the Republic of Ireland for investment from the US then it is important that the direct service is not lost. 4 6. On 13 June 2011 we announced that we would be holding a short enquiry on the implications for Northern Ireland of Air Passenger Duty. Due to the timescale we set ourselves to publish our Report before the House rose for the Summer Adjournment, we were regrettably somewhat constrained in the number of witnesses called. Nevertheless, we took evidence in Parliament Buildings, Stormont, from the Managing Director of Belfast International Airport and the Chief Executive of George Best Belfast City Airport; and at Westminster from the Northern Ireland Executive’s Department of Trade, Enterprise and Investment, the Consumer Council for Northern Ireland, British Midland International, easyJet, Flybe, Continental Airlines, the Northern Ireland Hotels Federation, the Aviation Environment Federation and HM Treasury.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TTF Federal Election Spotlight – PMC 2016
    TTF 2016 ELECTION PASSENGER SPOTLIGHT #2 MOVEMENT CHARGE Introduction The visitor economy provides $11 billion in taxes to the Government bank account on the products it sells. The most obvious of these in the Australian context is the Passenger Movement Charge (PMC), a $55 ‘holiday’ tax imposed on all travellers departing Australia – domestic and international – over 12 years of age. The PMC is a direct hit on the visitor’s hip pocket and is artificially constraining demand, especially as international competition for visitors continues to intensify. Australia’s PMC is a $1 billion tax hit on our visitor economy, imposed on both Australians and international visitors departing the country. While originally introduced as a cost recovery levy for passenger processing, numerous price hikes and a growing number of travellers means that the PMC has now become a ‘cash cow’ for Government – collecting three times more than what the cost to process passengers at international borders. Unnecessary travel taxes have real impacts on demand for travel to a destination and spending by visitors. Recognising the gains to be made in capturing the visitation of close neighbours, our competitors have taken steps to abolish travel taxes. This is why the industry welcomed the Federal Government’s commitment to freezing the PMC at $55 for the current term of Parliament.1 Recognising that visitor taxes can damage a destination’s price competitiveness, the industry very much hopes to see the current freeze on the PMC continue for the next term of Parliament, and for a commitment from all political parties to implement a timetable of phased reductions of the PMC to return it to a genuine cost recovery levy.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Thursday Volume 642 14 June 2018 No. 153 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 14 June 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1053 14 JUNE 2018 1054 Sir Christopher Chope (Christchurch) (Con): Is not it House of Commons right that we in this country are not able to exercise some of the rights that people would wish us to exercise? Thursday 14 June 2018 The freedom to be able to transport live animals for slaughter is a freedom that we would prefer not to have. As soon as we leave the European Union, we will be The House met at half-past Nine o’clock able to take control of those things for ourselves. Mr Baker: My hon. Friend raises a point on which I PRAYERS am sure that many of us have received correspondence. I look forward to the day when it is within the powers of this House to change those rules. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Stephen Hepburn (Jarrow) (Lab): Is not it right BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS that we have a customs union that protects workers’ rights, with the right to allow state aid, the right to UNIVERSITY OF LONDON BILL [LORDS] allow public ownership, and the right to be able to ban Motion made, That the Bill be now read a Second outsourcing and competitive tendering should the time. Government wish to do so? Hon. Members: Object. Mr Baker: If you will allow me, Mr Speaker, I would like to pay tribute to the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the 777Th Meeting of the Board of Trustees Held at the National Portrait Gallery, London WC2 on 3 July, 2019
    Minutes of the 777th Meeting of the Board of Trustees held at the National Portrait Gallery, London WC2 on 3 July, 2019 PRESENT: Mr David Ross (Chair) Dr Brian Allen Ms Allegra Berman Mr Roger Blundell (to item 6) Mr Rob Dickins Mr Marcus Harling Dr Joanna Kennedy Mr Christopher le Brun Mr Bjorn Saven Sir Peter Stothard Dr Andrew Roberts Mr Christopher Townsend Ms Rachel Wang Professor Shearer West Mr Jonathan Yeo APOLOGIES: Sir Michael Hintze The Rt Hon Mel Stride MP IN ATTENDANCE: Dr Nicholas Cullinan Director Mrs Pim Baxter Deputy Director and Secretary to the Board Ms Lornette Pemberton HR Director (item 1 only) Ms Lesley Williams Chief Financial Officer [INFORMATION REDACTED in accordance with section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 – Personal Data] 1. CHAIR’S BUSINESS 1.1 The Chair welcomed The Rt Hon Mel Stride MP as the Gallery’s new ex officio Trustee. 1.2 The Chair reported that applications were sought for a Trustee to replace Allegra Berman. It was hoped to find a Trustee with business experience. Trustees noted that experience of major projects and transformational change would also be useful. 1.3 The Director, Deputy Director, Chief Financial Officer, [INFORMATION REDACTED in accordance with section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 – Personal Data] left the room. The Remuneration Committee recommendation was given in private. The Director, Deputy Director, Chief Financial Officer, [INFORMATION REDACTED in accordance with section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 – Personal Data], rejoined the meeting. The HR Director left the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland and the EU Referendum
    House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Northern Ireland and the EU referendum First Report of Session 2016–17 HC 48 House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee Northern Ireland and the EU referendum First Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 25 May 2016 HC 48 Published on 26 May 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Northern Ireland Office (but excluding individual cases and advice given by the Crown Solicitor); and other matters within the responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (but excluding the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Northern Ireland and the drafting of legislation by the Office of the Legislative Counsel). Current membership Mr Laurence Robertson MP (Conservative, Tewkesbury) (Chair) Tom Blenkinsop MP (Labour, Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland) Oliver Colvile MP (Conservative, Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Mr Stephen Hepburn MP (Labour, Jarrow) Lady Hermon MP (Independent, North Down) Kate Hoey MP (Labour, Vauxhall) Danny Kinahan MP (Ulster Unionist Party, South Antrim) Jack Lopresti MP (Conservative, Filton and Bradley Stoke) Dr Alasdair McDonnell MP (Social Democratic and Labour Party, Belfast South) Nigel Mills MP (Conservative, Amber Valley) Ian Paisley MP (Democratic Unionist Party, North Antrim) Gavin Robinson MP (Democratic Unionist Party, Belfast East) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiff Meetings & Conferences Guide
    CARDIFF MEETINGS & CONFERENCES GUIDE www.meetincardiff.com WELCOME TO CARDIFF CONTENTS AN ATTRACTIVE CITY, A GREAT VENUE 02 Welcome to Cardiff That’s Cardiff – a city on the move We’ll help you find the right venue and 04 Essential Cardiff and rapidly becoming one of the UK’s we’ll take the hassle out of booking 08 Cardiff - a Top Convention City top destinations for conventions, hotels – all free of charge. All you need Meet in Cardiff conferences, business meetings. The to do is call or email us and one of our 11 city’s success has been recognised by conference organisers will get things 14 Make Your Event Different the British Meetings and Events Industry moving for you. Meanwhile, this guide 16 The Cardiff Collection survey, which shows that Cardiff is will give you a flavour of what’s on offer now the seventh most popular UK in Cardiff, the capital of Wales. 18 Cardiff’s Capital Appeal conference destination. 20 Small, Regular or Large 22 Why Choose Cardiff? 31 Incentives Galore 32 #MCCR 38 Programme Ideas 40 Tourist Information Centre 41 Ideas & Suggestions 43 Cardiff’s A to Z & Cardiff’s Top 10 CF10 T H E S L E A CARDIFF S I S T E N 2018 N E T S 2019 I A S DD E L CAERDY S CARDIFF CAERDYDD | meetincardiff.com | #MeetinCardiff E 4 H ROAD T 4UW RAIL ESSENTIAL INFORMATION AIR CARDIFF – THE CAPITAL OF WALES Aberdeen Location: Currency: E N T S S I E A South East Wales British Pound Sterling L WELCOME! A90 E S CROESO! Population: Phone Code: H 18 348,500 Country code 44, T CR M90 Area code: 029 20 EDINBURGH DF D GLASGOW M8 C D Language: Time Zone: A Y A68 R D M74 A7 English and Welsh Greenwich Mean Time D R I E Newcastle F F • C A (GMT + 1 in summertime) CONTACT US A69 BELFAST Contact: Twinned with: Meet in Cardiff team M6 Nantes – France, Stuttgart – Germany, Xiamen – A1 China, Hordaland – Norway, Lugansk – Ukraine Address: Isle of Man M62 Meet in Cardiff M62 Distance from London: DUBLIN The Courtyard – CY6 LIVERPOOL Approximately 2 hours by road or train.
    [Show full text]
  • A Scottish Approach to Taxation - CIOT/ ATT Members Survey
    A Scottish Approach to Taxation - CIOT/ ATT members survey The Scottish Government has committed itself to a tax system that adheres to Adam Smith’s four principles. Do you agree with the four principles that tax policy should: Response Answer Options Yes No Undecided No comment Count Be proportionate to the ability to pay 135 11 19 0 165 Provide certainty to the taxpayer 162 0 3 0 165 Provide convenience / ease of payment 160 2 2 1 165 Be efficient 160 0 2 2 164 If you wish, you may provide further comments e.g. the reasons why you agree or disagree with a particular principle. 27 answered question 165 skipped question 0 The Scottish Government has committed itself to a tax system that adheres to Adam Smith’s four principles. Do you agree with the four principles that tax policy should: 180 160 140 120 Yes 100 No Undecided 80 No comment 60 40 20 0 Be proportionate to Provide certainty to Provide Be efficient the ability to pay the taxpayer convenience / ease of payment A Scottish Approach to Taxation - CIOT/ ATT members survey Do you think the Scottish Government can achieve a taxation system underpinned by Adam Smith’s four principles? Response Response Answer Options Percent Count Yes 24.1% 39 No 34.0% 55 Undecided 40.7% 66 No comment 1.2% 2 If you answered ‘yes’, please explain how you think this might best be 65 answered question 162 skipped question 3 Do you think the Scottish Government can achieve a taxation system underpinned by Adam Smith’s four principles? Yes No Undecided No comment A Scottish Approach to Taxation - CIOT/ ATT members survey Are there any other principles you think that the Scottish taxation system should adhere to? Response Answer Options Count 82 answered question 82 skipped question 83 A Scottish Approach to Taxation - CIOT/ ATT members survey Council Tax – Council Tax has been devolved to Scotland since 1993, and local authorities have the power to set its level.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Departure Tax: Who Benefits? Analysis for Scottish Policymakers
    air departure tax: who benefits? analysis for scottish policymakers fellow travellers air departure tax: who benefits? About Fellow Travellers fellowtravellers.org Fellow Travellers is a not-for-profit, unincorporated association campaigning for fair and equitable solutions to the growing environmental damage caused by air travel. We aim to protect access to reasonable levels of flying for the less well-off, whilst maintaining aviation emissions within safe limits for the climate. About the authors Leo Murray is the founder of the Free Ride campaign and Director of strategy at climate change charity 10:10. Twitter @crisortunity Charlie Young is an independent researcher with a background in economics and climate change. He focuses on new economics and analyses the socio- economic impacts of policy interventions. Twitter @CMaxwellYoung Acknowledgements This paper was produced with the kind support of Scottish Green Party MSPs. We would also like to thank statisticians at Transport Scotland, HMRC and the CAA for their help compiling and making sense of the data that informs this analysis. Permission to share This document is published under a creative commons licence: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/ This paper was first published in June 2017. introduction This paper explores the clearest dimensions of the distributional impacts of the Scottish Government’s planned 50% cut in air passenger taxes, asking the question: who benefits? Our analysis of Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) Passenger Survey data from Scottish airports reveals that this £160m+ annual tax giveaway will predominantly go to line the pockets of wealthy frequent flyers and corporations, while the majority of Scots will lose out.
    [Show full text]
  • SUBMISSION of MARTIN EVANS to the PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE of the NATIONAL ASSEMBLY for WALES - CARDIFF/ANGLESEY AIR SERVICE Background
    SUBMISSION OF MARTIN EVANS TO THE PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES - CARDIFF/ANGLESEY AIR SERVICE Background Martin Evans is a Visiting Fellow at the University of South Wales. In 2008, working with the Wales Transport Research Centre at the University and Halcrow, he undertook the first year monitoring report of the Cardiff/Anglesey air service on behalf of the Welsh Government. No further monitoring reports have been published by the Welsh Government. Introduction The possibility of Welsh internal air services was proposed in „The Future of Air Transport - Wales‟ White Paper published by the UK Department for Transport in 2003. A feasibility study was undertaken by The Welsh Government and published in the form of a consultation in 2004. The consultation document examined the feasibility of a number of different networks for Welsh internal air services and the level of investment required for the necessary infrastructure. There are no internal air routes in Wales that would be viable if operated on a commercial basis. The Welsh Government acquired the powers to fund internal air services under a Public Service Obligation (PSO) in the Transport (Wales) Act 2006. The conditions to be followed in funding a PSO route are set out in Article 16 of the Air Services Regulations 1008/2008 of the European Union. “3. The necessity and the adequacy of an envisaged public service obligation shall be assessed by the Member State(s) having regard to: a) the proportionality between the envisaged obligation and the economic needs of the region concerned; b) the possibility of having recourse to other modes of transport and the ability of such modes to meet the transport needs under consideration, in particular when existing rail services serve the envisaged route with a travel time of less than three hours and with sufficient frequencies, connections and suitable timings; c) the air fares and conditions which can be quoted to users; d) the combined effect of all air carriers operating or intending to operate on the route.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Passenger Duty and Air Departure Tax - Highlands and Islands Exemption
    SPICe Briefing Pàipear-ullachaidh SPICe Air Passenger Duty and Air Departure Tax - Highlands and Islands exemption Anouk Berthier This is a short note on the Air Passenger Duty exemption for passengers departing from areas in the Scottish Highlands and Islands and the Scottish Government's intention to put in place a similar exemption under Air Departure Tax. 12 October 2017 SB 17-70 Air Passenger Duty and Air Departure Tax - Highlands and Islands exemption, SB 17-70 Contents Background ____________________________________________________________3 Air Passenger Duty (APD) Highlands and Islands exemption ___________________4 Air Departure Tax (ADT) exemption for the Highlands and Islands _______________7 Fiscal framework considerations___________________________________________9 Bibliography___________________________________________________________ 11 2 Air Passenger Duty and Air Departure Tax - Highlands and Islands exemption, SB 17-70 Background Following the recommendations of the Smith Commission (2014), the Scotland Act 2016 provides for the power to charge tax on air passengers leaving Scottish airports to be devolved to the Scottish Parliament. The Air Departure Tax (Scotland) Bill was introduced in the Scottish Parliament on 19 December 2016 and received Royal Assent on 25 July 2017. The Air Departure Tax (Scotland) Act 2017 introduces an Air Departure Tax (ADT) which is intended to replace Air Passenger Duty (APD) in Scotland. The fiscal framework agreement between the Scottish and UK Government states that APD will be devolved in April 2018. 1 Tax bands and tax rate amounts are not provided for in the Act and will be set by secondary legislation. The Air Departure Tax (Scotland) Bill as introduced 2 did not provide for exemptions. However, the Finance and Constitution Committee ("the Committee") stated in its Stage 1 report on the Bill: 3 “ The Committee asks the Scottish Government to respond to the suggestion that flights to Highlands and Islands airports from other Scottish airports should be exempted from the definition of chargeable aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • All 23 Taxes.Pdf
    Air passenger duty 1 Alcohol duty 2 Apprenticeship levy 3 Bank corporation tax surcharge 4 Bank levy 5 Business rates 6 Capital gains tax 7 Climate change levy 8 Corporation tax 9 Council tax 10 Fuel duty 11 Income tax 13 Inheritance tax 15 Insurance premium tax 16 National insurance 17 Petroleum revenue tax 19 Soft drink industry levy 20 Stamp duty land tax 21 Stamp duty on shares 22 Tobacco duty 23 TV licence fee 24 Value added tax 25 Vehicle excise duty 26 AIR PASSENGER DUTY What is it? Air passenger duty (APD) is a levy paid by passengers to depart from UK (and Isle of Man) airports on most aircraft. Onward-bound passengers on connecting flights are not liable, nor those on aircraft weighing under 10 tonnes or with fewer than 20 seats. It was introduced in 1994 at a rate of £5 per passenger to EEA destinations, and £10 to non-EEA destinations. In 2001 a higher rate for non-economy class seats was introduced. In 2009 EEA and non-EEA bands were replaced with four distance bands (measured from the destination’s capital city to London, not the actual flight distance) around thresholds of 2,000, 4,000 and 6,000 miles. In 2015 the highest two bands were abolished, leaving only two remaining: band A up to 2,000 miles and band B over 2,000 miles. For each band there is a reduced rate (for the lowest class seats), a standard rate and a higher rate (for seats in aircraft of over 20 tonnes equipped for fewer than 19 passengers).
    [Show full text]