DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report Fiscal Year 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Education Annual Report Fiscal Year 2015 Family Employment Independence Our Mission The mission of The Children’s Village is to work in partnership with families to help society’s most vulnerable children so that they become educationally proficient, economically productive, and socially responsible members of their communities. Please Note . The names listed in this Annual Report have supported our work through financial contributions, gifts in kind, or volunteering during the past fiscal year (July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015). We sincerely hope that this list is complete, but if we have inadvertently omitted your name, please bring it to our at- tention at [email protected]. We are grateful to every one of our supporters. Letter from the President Dear Friend, This has been an exciting year for The Children’s Village. Our new building in Harlem is rising quick- ly. It will provide 60 affordable one and two bedroom apartments for families, as well as spaces for CV’s programs and partners, and a penthouse for pregnant and parenting foster teens. We hope to be able to invite you to a gala opening next Fall. Also this year, we announced our merger with Inwood House, America’s premier 185-year old char- ity known for its groundbreaking work in pregnancy prevention and with pregnant and parenting teens. This merger allows us to broaden our expertise in the critical area of pregnancy prevention and female empowerment. With We were nominated by this merger and our strategic partnership with Harlem Dowling (est. 1836), our history has grown even richer and our expertise broad- Senator Gillibrand for the er. If strengthening young women and girls interests you, watch for special events and luncheons that will help you learn more. Or Congressional Coalition on reach out to find out how you can get involved as a volunteer or mentor, to help provide the connections that our children desper- Adoption’s national Angels ately need. in Adoption™ award. In May, we were honored to be the only organization invited to testify before congress about the importance of keeping kids in communities. And just this month, we were nominated by Senator Gillibrand for the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute’s national Angels in Adoption Award. This year, as we have for 164 years since 1851, we remained true to the mission you believe in-- keeping children safe and families together. In the following pages, we have outlined our various programs and how they fit into our core values. I welcome your feedback and your questions. Or, if your schedule permits, please make time for a visit and personal tour. Your support helps us to create families for children and because of you, we are changing the lives of children and families every day. I hope this annual report on our activities will continue to inspire your support and generosity. I am deeply grateful for all you do. Jeremy C. Kohomban, PhD President and CEO [email protected] Our Programs The Children’s Village operates more than 25 different programs with a focus on the most troubled children, teens and families in the New York area. We work with young people who have been abused or neglected, are home- less, have committed minor crimes, are struggling with mental illness—in short, the kids who are not likely to make it without help. All of these programs are designed to keep children safe and families together by doing one of three things: 1) prevent children and teens from needing to be removed from their homes (to foster care, residential care or incar- ceration); 2) when that fails, provide out of home care designed to get children home as quickly as possible; or 3) prevent children from returning to state custody or incarceration. Prevent Kids from Being Removed from Their Homes u Multi-Systemic Therapy u Teen Preventive Program u Street Outreach u Education and Employment Center u Polo Grounds Community Center Fulfilling our mission to keep children safe and families Provide Short-Term together Prevent Kids from Out-of-Home Care Returning to Care or u Dobbs Ferry Residential Campus Incarceration u Sanctuary Shelter u WAY Home Aftercare u Apartments for Homeless Teens u Bridges to Health u Foster Homes u STEP Westchester Aftercare u Staten Island Non-secure Place- u Harlem Justice Program ment u Arches Mentoring u Multi-Systemic Therapy Outcomes Measuring our Success 80% of CV students Education graduate HS Nat’l Fact Sheet on Ed Outcomes: 50% of foster children do not complete high school by age 18 99.4% of CV foster children went to a permanent family NYC: 84% of children who left Family foster care in 2014 went to a permanent family 70% of eligible CV youth are working Employment Center for Urban Future: 50% of 21-24 year old former foster youth in NYC are likely to be out of work 88% of older teens who left CV have stable housing Center for Urban Future: 25% of Independence foster youth entered a homeless shelter within 3 years of leaving foster care The Children’s Village Summary of Operations - FY2015 Excerpts from the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. Operating Revenue (before private contributions and endowment distribution): Government Grants & Contracts $77,228,100 Affordable Housing (rent) 1,020,300 Miscellaneous 43,500 Total Operating Revenue - $78,291,900 Operating Expenses: Program Expenses Residential School $25,950,700 Division of Immigration Services 15,720,700 Foster Homes 13,146,400 Family Preservation & Reunification 6,415,900 Medical & Mental Health Services 4,944,900 Short-term Shelters & Housing 1,971,100 Community Outreach & WAY Home 1,619,000 Polo Grounds Community Center 1,205,100 Affordable Housing 1,014,100 Crisis Stabilization 856,300 Total Program Expenses 72,844,200 Management & General 6,632,200 Fundraising 313,500 Total Operating Expenses - $79,789,900 Deficit from Operations ($1,498,000) Other Financial Sources: Contributions, Grants, Events (net) Restricted-Program Specific 3,125,900 Unrestricted 739,900 Total Contributions, Grants, Events (net) 3,865,800 Annual Endowment Distribution 390,000 Funded Capital Projects 1,113,800 Surplus Prior to Depreciation $3,871,600 Depreciation $4,190,400 Net Deficit ($318,800) Notes 1) The Consolidated Audited Financial Statements will be available in January 2016. 2) The IRS Form 990 will be available through a link on our website in May 2016. Endowment As of 6/30/2015, The Children’s Village endowment was valued at $12,397,100. In order to continue to grow our endowment, by Board resolution, all estate gifts not otherwise designated are placed in the endowment. Private Support Most of CV’s revenue comes from government contracts and grants, but government funds often fall short of what is needed to operate programs that work. Private dollars pay for support for teens who leave our campus with no family, the Canine Program in which our teens groom and train dogs for people with physical disabilities, volun- teer mentors for kids with no one, and much more. Thanks to you, The Children’s Village raised almost $4 million for programs like these. We are proud to say that our trustees are committed to raising the needed funds and 100% contribute personally. The total cost of fundraising was $313,500, which is 8% of funds raised. That means that 92 cents of every dollar raised supports programs and operations. Thank you! Children and Families Served in Fiscal Year 2015 Residential School 425 students Division of Immigration Services 516 children Foster Homes 569 children Family Preservation & Reunification 663 families Short-term Shelters and Housing 235 youth Community Outreach & WAY Home* 6,391 youth Polo Grounds 1,028 children and teens Affordable Housing 112 families Crisis Stabilization 127 children Day Students** 70 students Daycare 29 children TOTALS 10,165 children and families *Does not include 434 hotline calls ** Served by Greenburgh Eleven School Our Partners Earlier this year, CV announced a merger with Inwood House. Founded in the mid 1800’s, both CV and Inwood House bring a rich history and compelling charitable mission to help those most in need. CV’s expertise lies in working with a broad base of at-risk teens, while Inwood House offers a unique niche within that segment with its expertise in caring for pregnant and parenting teens. We anticipate the merger will be completed by the end of 2015. Two years ago, CV formed strategic alliances with two nonprofits, Harlem Dowling founded in 1836, the oldest and first organizaiton to exclusively serve children of color, and Bridge Builders, a community partnership in the Bronx. These organizations are embedded in New York City communities serving at-risk children and families. CV provides leadership and management support to keep them financially and programmatically strong. STRATEGIC PA R TN ER SH IP B rid g e B u i ld e r s The Children’sInwood House Village S T R A T E G P I I C H S P R E A R S N T T T R R N A A E T P R E S G IC H I IC G P TE P A RA R ST TN g ERS wlin HIP Harlem Do General Support Gifts not specified for a particular purpose are considered general support and used where they are needed most. Donations for programs or events are listed separately, and donors may appear in more than one section. For that reason, donation amounts may be larger than indicated here. Whatever your gift, thank you. $100,000 and Above AFEC Guardian Fire Kenneth Kirshenbaum & Sabin & Beverley Streeter The Annie E. Casey Foundation Protection, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • Beyond the Dream Act Latino Leaders' Lack of Legislative

    Beyond the Dream Act Latino Leaders' Lack of Legislative

    National New York State Institute for Beyond The Dream Act Latino Policy (NiLP) Latino Leaders' Lack 25 West 18th Street of Legislative Imagination at New York, NY 10011 800-590-2516 the Moment They Must Think Big [email protected] By Angelo Falcón www.latinopolicy.org City & State (September 18, 2014) Appears as part of new series by City & State magazine, "The Road to Somos," edited by Gerson Borrero Board of Directors In light of the extreme discontent with President Obama José R. Sánchez among Latinos over his latest delay and broken promises in Chair addressing the issue of deportation relief, how New York Edgar DeJesus State approaches immigrant issues from a legislative Secretary standpoint has become more important and urgent than Israel Colon ever. It was from that perspective that I tuned in with great Treasurer interest to WABC-TV's Tiempo Latino public affairs program Maria Rivera last Sunday, which featured as its guests State Senators José Development Chair Peralta of Queens and José Serrano, who represents parts of Hector Figueroa both the Bronx and Manhattan. Tanya K. Hernandez Angelo Falcón Together, Peralta and President Serrano have served over a quarter of a century in To make a elected office and as donation, prominent Democratic legislators in New York I Mail check or money figured that they would order to the above be a good barometer to address to the order gauge the mood of the of "National Institute Latino political class in for Lastino Policy" regard to Obama's standing as "Deporter-in- Follow us Chief". In many ways, on onTwitter and the national level the Latino community and immigrant advocates now find Angelo's Facebook themselves at a major crossroads, as they come to terms with the limits of Page their reform efforts and grapple with whether there needs to be a fundamental reassessment of their political strategy.
  • View Centro's Film List

    View Centro's Film List

    About the Centro Film Collection The Centro Library and Archives houses one of the most extensive collections of films documenting the Puerto Rican experience. The collection includes documentaries, public service news programs; Hollywood produced feature films, as well as cinema films produced by the film industry in Puerto Rico. Presently we house over 500 titles, both in DVD and VHS format. Films from the collection may be borrowed, and are available for teaching, study, as well as for entertainment purposes with due consideration for copyright and intellectual property laws. Film Lending Policy Our policy requires that films be picked-up at our facility, we do not mail out. Films maybe borrowed by college professors, as well as public school teachers for classroom presentations during the school year. We also lend to student clubs and community-based organizations. For individuals conducting personal research, or for students who need to view films for class assignments, we ask that they call and make an appointment for viewing the film(s) at our facilities. Overview of collections: 366 documentary/special programs 67 feature films 11 Banco Popular programs on Puerto Rican Music 2 films (rough-cut copies) Roz Payne Archives 95 copies of WNBC Visiones programs 20 titles of WNET Realidades programs Total # of titles=559 (As of 9/2019) 1 Procedures for Borrowing Films 1. Reserve films one week in advance. 2. A maximum of 2 FILMS may be borrowed at a time. 3. Pick-up film(s) at the Centro Library and Archives with proper ID, and sign contract which specifies obligations and responsibilities while the film(s) is in your possession.
  • Voting Rights in New York City: 1982–2006

    Voting Rights in New York City: 1982–2006

    VOTING RIGHTS IN NEW YORK CITY: 1982–2006 JUAN CARTAGENA* I. INTRODUCTION TO THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT At the time of the 1982 amendments to the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the continuation of Section 5 coverage to three counties in New York City, the city was at a major crossroads regarding faithful compliance with the mandates of the Act. Just one year earlier in the largest city in the United States, the largest municipal election apparatus in the country was brought to a screeching halt when the federal courts enjoined the Septem- ber mayoral primaries—two days before Election Day—because the city failed to obtain preclearance of new (and discriminatory) city council lines and election district changes.1 The cost of closing down the election was enormous, and a lesson was painfully learned: minority voters knew how to get back to court, the courts would not stand by idly in the face of obvious Section 5 noncompliance and business-as-usual politics would no longer be the same. Weeks later, the Department of Justice (DOJ) would not only of- ficially deny preclearance to the city council plan, but would find that its egregious disregard of the burgeoning African-American and Latino voting strength in the city had a discriminatory purpose and a discriminatory ef- fect.2 In this context, the 1982 extension of Section 5 to parts of New York City should not have seemed so anomalous to a country that continued to * General Counsel, Community Service Society. Esmeralda Simmons of the Center for Law and Social Justice, Medgar Evers College, Margaret Fung of the Asian American Legal Defense and Educa- tion Fund, Jon Greenbaum of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and Debo Adegbile of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund assisted in editing this report.
  • Voting Rights in New York 1982-2006, LEP Language Access

    Voting Rights in New York 1982-2006, LEP Language Access

    VOTING RIGHTS IN NEW YORK 1982-2006 A REPORT OF RENEWTHEVRA.ORG PREPARED BY JUAN CARTAGENA MARCH 2006 VOTING RIGHTS IN NEW YORK 1982-2006 1 JUAN CARTAGENA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the Voting Rights Act 2 I. Section 5 Preclearance Activity 4 A. Section 5 Objections 4 B. DOJ More Information Requests 10 II. Deployment of Federal Observers 12 III. Language Assistance Litigation & Compliance Issues 13 A. Language Assistance Litigation and Compliance Issues Outside of NYC 17 IV. Voting Rights Litigation 18 V. Racially Polarized Voting in New York 20 Conclusion 26 1 General Counsel, Community Service Society. Esmeralda Simmons (Center for Law & Social Justice, Megar Evers College), Margaret Fung (Asian American Legal Defense & Education Fund), Jon Greenbaum ((Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law) and Debo Adegbile (NAACP Legal Defense Fund) assisted in editing this report; and Glenn Magpantay (Asian American Legal Defense & Education Fund), Gabriel Torres, Walter Fields (Community Service Society) and Paul Wooten were instrumental in collecting materials relied upon in this report. 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT At the time of the 1982 amendments to the Voting Rights Act and the continuation of Section 5 coverage to three counties in New York City, the city was at a major crossroads regarding faithful compliance with the mandates of the Act. Just one year earlier in the largest city in the United States, the largest municipal election apparatus in the country was brought to a screeching halt in September 1981 when the federal courts enjoined the mayoral primaries – two days before Election Day – because the city failed to obtain preclearance of new (and discriminatory) city council lines and election district changes.2 The cost of closing down the election was enormous and a lesson was painfully learned: minority voters knew how to get back to court, the courts would not stand by idly in the face of obvious Section 5 noncompliance, and business-as- usual politics would no longer be the same.
  • Ethnic Political Mobilization in the Diaspora Caribbean Studies, Vol

    Ethnic Political Mobilization in the Diaspora Caribbean Studies, Vol

    Caribbean Studies ISSN: 0008-6533 [email protected] Instituto de Estudios del Caribe Puerto Rico Vargas-Ramos, Carlos Caribbeans in New York : Political Participation , Strategic Cooperation and the Prospect for Pan - Ethnic Political Mobilization in the Diaspora Caribbean Studies, vol. 39, núm. 1-2, enero-diciembre, 2011, pp. 65-103 Instituto de Estudios del Caribe San Juan, Puerto Rico Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39222778003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative CARIBBEANS IN NEW YORK... 65 Caribbeans IN NEW York: Political Participation, StrategIC Cooperation and the Prospect fOR Pan-ethnic Political Mobilization IN the Diaspora Carlos Vargas-Ramos ABSTRACT This work examines the inauspicious environment for the formation of pan-Caribbean strategic coalitions and political mobilization in the Diaspora. Caribbeans in New York City have a distinct political participation profile, characterized by lower rates of participation, but driven largely by the impact Hispanic Caribbeans have on the larger Caribbean collective that includes Afro-Caribbeans. Analysis of legislative co-operation among Caribbean elected officials and the initiatives of political entrepreneurs who seek to create distinct bases of political support by forging alternative identities reveal further that, despite initiatives by such strategic actors, Caribbeans exhibit a variety of identities, some of which may be in competition, contradiction or simply to fledgling to withstand challenges from readily articulated and enduring identities and extant political allegiances.
  • Chapter 1—Introduction

    Chapter 1—Introduction

    NOTES CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION 1. See Juan Flores, “Rappin’, Writin’ & Breakin,’” Centro, no. 3 (1988): 34–41; Nelson George, Hip Hop America (New York: Viking, 1998); Steve Hager, Hip Hop: The Illustrated History of Breakdancing, Rapping and Graffiti (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984); Tricia Rose, Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America (Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, 1994); David Toop, The Rap Attack 2: African Rap to Global Hip Hop (London: Serpent’s Tail, 1991). 2. Edward Rodríguez, “Sunset Style,” The Ticker, March 6, 1996. 3. Carlito Rodríguez, “The Young Guns of Hip-Hop,” The Source 105 ( June 1998): 146–149. 4. Clyde Valentín, “Big Pun: Puerto Rock Style with a Twist of Black and I’m Proud,” Stress, issue 23 (2000): 48. 5. See Juan Flores, Divided Borders: Essays on Puerto Rican Identity (Hous- ton: Arte Público Press, 1993); Bonnie Urciuoli, Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race and Class (Boulder, CO: West- view Press, 1996). 6. See Manuel Alvarez Nazario, El elemento afronegroide en el español de Puerto Rico (San Juan: Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña,1974); Paul Gilroy, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness (Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993); Marshall Stearns, The Story of Jazz (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958); Robert Farris Thompson, “Hip Hop 101,” in William Eric Perkins, ed., Droppin’ Sci- ence: Critical Essays on Rap Music and Hip Hop Culture (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1996), pp. 211–219; Carlos “Tato” Torres and Ti-Jan Francisco Mbumba Loango, “Cuando la bomba ñama...!:Reli- gious Elements of Afro-Puerto Rican Music,” manuscript 2001.
  • The Impact of High-Spending Non-Participants on the Campaign

    The Impact of High-Spending Non-Participants on the Campaign

    high-spending non-participants on the Campaign Finance Program Copyright © 2006 New York City Campaign Finance Board 40 Rector Street, 7th Floor New York, New York 10006 All rights reserved. NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr. Chairman Dale C. Christensen, Jr. Katheryn C. Patterson Mark S. Piazza Joseph Potasnik Board Members Amy M. Loprest Executive Director Carole Campolo Deputy Executive Director Sue Ellen Dodell General Counsel Man Wai Gin Erik Joerss Director of Administrative Services Chief of Candidate Services Diana Lundy Kenneth O’Brien Chief of Data Operations Director of Systems Administration Julius Peele Elizabeth A. Upp Director of Auditing and Accounting Director of Communications Th e Board would like to thank Daniel Cho, Crystal Choy, Donald Ferracci, Eric Friedman, Winnie Ng, and Kate Schachern for their work in preparing this report. lections are won or lost for a multitude of reasons. Merit, incumbency, campaign spending, party support, newspaper endorsements, ethnicity, as well as any number of events not directly related Eto an election infl uence a campaign’s ultimate success or failure.1 In recent years, the role of campaign spending has again come to the forefront of New York City’s political debate. Money is, of course, an important factor in shaping electoral outcomes. But neither self-fi nancing nor a high level of spending alone is determinative. Indeed, the strongest predictor of electoral success is incumbency, while spending is a close (though often overlapping) second.2 In each of the past two mayoral elections, a self-funded candidate with seemingly unlimited resources has challenged the ability of New York City’s ground-breaking Campaign Finance Program to create a level playing fi eld for all candidates.
  • Future CUNY Facility on Governors Island Jointly Announced By

    Future CUNY Facility on Governors Island Jointly Announced By

    www.cuny.edu • N EWS OF THE C ITY U NIVERSITY OF N EW Y ORK • May 2002 ATAGLANCE Future CUNY Facility on Governors Island CUNY Media Conference Jointly Announced by Governor and Mayor Addresses “Attack Mentality” he local Canarsee Indians called it as a recruiting 1at The Graduate Center Pagganck. In 1637, when the Dutch depot and prison T governor general Wouter van Twiller for Confederate New York Times bought it for two axe heads, a string of captives. assistant manag- beads, and some iron nails, the name was ing editor Michael changed to Nooten Eylandt. The British Looking to the Oreskes was the later called it Nutten Island, eventually future, keynote speaker reserving it for the “benefit and accommo- Bloomberg at a student dation of His Majesty’s governors.” emphasized how media confer- Consistent with an announcement on the new campus ence attended by April 1 by Governor George E. Pataki and will “give us the more than 500. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, historic ability to move See page 9. Governors Island may also become known programs here, to as CUNY Island. The Governor and the free up space on New Chair in Social Justice Mayor informed happy New Yorkers—and City University Receives First Occupant even more enthusiastic New York City campuses in all at Medgar Evers College students and educators—that President five boroughs.” 2 George W. Bush had embraced their pro- Noting that Chancellor Matthew Goldstein, left, with Mayor Bloomberg, Longtime Medgar Evers College posal to turn the 172-acre former military CUNY already Governor Pataki and several CUNY students at the Governors professor and international base into a major campus within the City has 12 campuses Island news conference on April 2.
  • View Centro's Film List

    View Centro's Film List

    About Our Film Collection The Centro Library and Archives houses one of the most extensive collections of films documenting the Puerto Rican experience. The collection includes documentaries, public service news programs; Hollywood produced feature films, as well as those produced by the film industry in Puerto Rico. Presently we house over 500 titles, both in DVD and VHS format. The collection is circulating and is made available for teaching, study and entertainment purposes with due consideration for copyright and intellectual property laws. Film Lending Policy Our policy requires that films be picked up at our facility, we do not mail out. Films from the collection may be borrowed by college professors, elementary and secondary school teachers for classroom presentations during the school year. We also lend to student clubs and community based organizations. For individuals conducting personal research, or for students who need to view films for class assignments, we ask that they call and make an appointment for viewing the film(s) at our facilities. Overview of collections: 362 documentary/special programs 67 feature films 11 Banco Popular programs on Puerto Rican Music 2 films (rough-cut copies) Roz Payne Archives 95 copies of WNBC Visiones programs 20 titles of WNET Realidades programs Total # of titles=556 (As of 9/9/16) 1 Procedures for Borrowing Films 1. Reserve films one week in advance. 2. A maximum of 2 FILMS may be borrowed at a time. 3. Pick-up film(s) at the Centro Library and Archives with proper identification and sign contract which specifies obligations and responsibilities while the film(s) is in your possession.