DOCSLIB.ORG

D °Cument Is the Property of Her 3Ritannic Majesty's Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D °Cument Is the Property of Her 3Ritannic Majesty's Government SECRET T HlS D °CUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HER 3RITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT >.) 13th 7Q Elusions COPY NO CABINET CONCLUSIONS of a Meeting of the Cabinet held at 10 Downing Street on THURSDAY 1 APRIL 1982 at 9. 30 am PRESENT The Rt Hon Margaret Thatcher MP Prime Minister S Hon Wte Willi The Rt Hon Lord Hailsham ta am White law MP r V of State for the Home Department Lord Chancellor V c , n Sir Geoffrey Howe QC MP The Rt Hon Sir Keith Joseph MP Cell°r of the Exchequer Secretary of State for Education and Science n Fr W<j p ° ancis Pym MP The Rt Hon James Prior MP re siden t of the Council Secretary of State for Northern Ireland ^cte* H ° n J ° h n Nott M P The Rt Hon Michael Heseltine MP ary of state for Defence Secretary of State for the Environment tHe Rt H Ss n c fe r ° George Younger MP The Rt Hon Nicholas Edwards MP - e> Secretary of State for Wales y of State for Scotland Io ^r* tj °n n HumHumphre; y Atkins MP The Rt Hon John Biff en MP riv Y Seal Secretary of State for Trade 1 III* Hon-avi D d Howell MP The Rt Hon Norman Fowler MP arY of State for Transport Secretary of State for Social Services C W; H o n Leon Brittan GC MP The Rt Hon Baroness Young 1 oecretary— , Treasury Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster % n N i g e l La The Rt Hon Norman Tebbit MP ^ v ° f w SO n MP o f State for Energy Secretary of State for Employment The Rt Hon Cecil Parkinson MP Paymaster General SECRET SECRET ALSO PRESENT The Rt Hon Michael Jopling M P Parliamentary Secretary, Treasury SECRETARIAT Sir Robert Armstrong Mr P L Gregson (Item 5) Mr D M Elliott (Items 2 and 3) Mr D J L Moore (Item 5) Mr R L L Facer (Items 2-4) Mr D H J Hilary (Item 1) Mr L J Harris (Item 1) Mr D H Colvin (Item 4) CONTENTS Subject Pag e 1. PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS 1 Role of Comptroller and Auditor General 1 2. FOREIGN AFFAIRS El Salvador 2 Falkland Islands •a Nuclear Weapons COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 4. 29/30 March European Council 3 5. NORTHERN IRELAND ­ CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 5 1982 PUBLIC EXPENDITURE SURVEY 8 ii SECRET CONFIDENTIAL 1. The Cabinet were informed of the business to be taken in the House of Commons during the following week. 01* of THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER said that Mr Joel Barnett and Mr Edward du Cann had with the support of other members pf Nudito r the Public Accounts Committee tabled an amendment to the Local n*ra l Government Finance (No 2) Bill which would require the Audit Commission to undertake studies of the impact on local authority administration of statutory provisions and of guidance and instruc­ tions issued to them by Ministers, would give the Comptroller and Auditor General (C and AG) access to all documents and records held by the Commission relating to any such studies, and would require him to report the results of his examination of them to Parliament. This was an indirect way of pursuing the Public Accounts Committee's recommendations for extending the role of the C and AG. If the amendment were accepted, it would lead to further pressure for giving the C and A G access to the records of nationalised industries. The principle of strengthening the powers of Parliament to investigate public sector administration generally would command widespread support in Parliament, and it could be difficult to defeat the amendment. On the other hand, the local authority associations and their Parliamentary supporters could be expected to have strong reservations about giving the C and A G power to duplicate part of the work of the Audit Commission and access to documents of individual local authorities; this would run counter to the case which had been made throughout the discussions on the Local Government Finance (No 2) Bill and its predecessor against excessive central Government interference in local administiation. The amendment as it stood war imprecise and unacceptable, and should be resisted. If a compromise proved to be necessary to avoid defeat, the Government might have to con­ sider accepting the principle of the amendment on condition that the C and A G would not have access to papers of or relating to individual local authorities held by the Audit Commission. This would make it easier to hold the line subsequently on access to the records of nationalised industries. THE PRIME MINISTER, summing up a short discussion, said that the amendment would result in wholly unnecessary bureaucratic activity, which would duplicate the work of the Audit Commission. The Secretary of State for the Environment should in the course of that afternoon seek to establish from the sponsors of the amendment precisely how they expected it to work in practice, and how far they might be prepared to modify it to meet the points made in discussion In the light of these consultations, she would consider further with the Ministers directly concerned how the amendment should be handled. 1 CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL The Cabinet - Invited the Secretary of State for the Environment to discuss the proposed amendment to the Local Government Finance (No 2) Bill with Mr Joel Barnett and Mr EdwardDu Cann, as indicated in the Prime Minister's summing up of their discussion, and to report the outcome to the Prime Minister. 2. THE LORD PRIVY SEAL said that in the recent elections in El Salvador the Christian Democratic Party led by President Duarte had secured only some 40 per cent of the votes. If the various right wing parties were able to combine, the Christian Democrats would be kept out of the Government, but the situation was still confused. The British observers would return to the United Kingdom on the following day, and their report was likely to be published by the end of the month, although a shortened version might be available sooner. THE LORD PRIVY SEAL said that 12 Argentinians were still ashore at Port Leith on the island of South Georgia, and there had been reports that more had recently arrived. Diplomatic efforts were continuing to persuade the Argentine Government to secure their departure. It was not clear whether the landing on South Georgia on 19 March had been contrived by the Argentine Government, but it should remain the British aim to reach a solution by diplomatic means rather than by action which might provoke a military response by Argentina. The Argentine press had reacted sharply to British press reports about naval movements. The United States Government had agreed to a request to intervene with the Argentine Government. The British Ambassador in Buenos Aires had also made representations on the previous day and would do so again today. It had been reported that Argentine naval forces had been deployed to the area of the Falkland Islands. Certain precautionary measures had been taken, but it would not be an easy task to defend a colony which was 8, 000 miles distant from the United Kingdom and 3, 500 miles from the nearest airfield of the use of which the British Government could be assured. THE PRIME MINISTER, summing up a brief discussion, said that the intensions of the Argentine Government were not known, but as a precaution HMS Endurance had been instructed to sail from South Georgia to Port Stanley. The best hope of avoiding a serious confron­ tation with Argentina lay in the influence which the United States could 2 CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL bring to bear on the Argentine Government. In readily agreeing to intervene on our behalf, the United States Administration had recognised the support which the United Kingdom Government had given them in other areas. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE said that the meeting of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Nuclear Planning Group which he had attended in the United States the previous week had unanimously agreed a communique which supported the British decision to maintain an effective strategic nuclear deterrent. Even those members of the Alliance who were particularly nervous about current nuclear weapons issues had agreed to a reference in the communique that strategic nuclear forces were the ultimate guarantee of the security of the Alliance. THE PRIME MINISTER said that further efforts were needed to convince public opinion that the Government's decision on Trident was right. The d ecision had been a factor in the recent Hillhead by-election, but President Reagan's recent statement of his determination to engage the Soviet Union in disarmament talks, which would lead to a substantial reduction in strategic nuclear weapons, would be helpful. The Cabinet - Took note. 3. THE PRIME MINISTER said that discussion of the economic and social situation at the European Council on 29/30 March had been more realistic than on previous occasions, though the Danish, French and Irish representatives had found themselves out of step with the rest because of the damaging effects their domestic economic policies were having on their public sector deficits, their interest rates and their exchange rates. The European Council had also taken note of a statement by Mr Papandreou, the Greek Prime Minister, seeking more Community aid for Greece. As to the 30 May 1980 Mandate, it had been intended that only a short discussion should take place, leading to an instruction to Foreign Ministers to proceed with the negotiations at their meeting on 3 April on the basis of the proposed budget solution, put forward by the Presidents of the Council and the Commission at the last Council of Ministers (Foreign Affairs) on 23 March.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haessly, Katie (2010) British Conservative Women Mps
    British Conservative Women MPs and ‘Women’s Issues’ 1950-1979 Katie Haessly, BA MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 1 Abstract In the period 1950-1979, there were significant changes in legislation relating to women’s issues, specifically employment, marital and guardianship and abortion rights. This thesis explores the impact of Conservative female MPs on these changes as well as the changing roles of women within the party. In addition there is a discussion of the relationships between Conservative women and their colleagues which provides insights into the changes in gender roles which were occurring at this time. Following the introduction the next four chapters focus on the women themselves and the changes in the above mentioned women’s issues during the mid-twentieth century and the impact Conservative women MPs had on them. The changing Conservative attitudes are considered in the context of the wider changes in women’s roles in society in the period. Chapter six explores the relationship between women and men of the Conservative Parliamentary Party, as well as men’s impact on the selected women’s issues. These relationships were crucial to enhancing women’s roles within the party, as it is widely recognised that women would not have been able to attain high positions or affect the issues as they did without help from male colleagues. Finally, the female Labour MPs in the alteration of women’s issues is discussed in Chapter seven. Labour women’s relationships both with their party and with Conservative women are also examined.
    [Show full text]
  • (C) Crown Copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/128/60/8 Image
    (c) crown copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/128/60/8 Image Reference:0001 DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY *S GOVERNMENT ! C1*(76) 30th [ ^"elusions CABINET CONCLUSIONS of a Meeting of the Cabinet held at 10 Downing Street on THURSDAY 4 NOVEMBER 1976 1 at 10.30 am PRESENT The Rt Hon James Callaghan MP Prime Minister **** Rt Hon Michael Foot MP The Rt Hon Lord Elwyn-Jones ***d President of the Council Lord Chancellor Jj* Rt Hon Denis Healey MP The Rt Hon Merh/ft Rees MP ^kajocellor of the Exchequer Secretary of State for the Home Department J* Rt Hon Shirley Williams MP The Rt Hon Anthony Wedgwood Bean MP ^cretary of State for Education and Science Secretary of State for Energy £Vymaster General Rt Hon Erie Varley MP The Rt Hon Peter Shore MP ^rotar y of State for Industry Secretary of State for the Environment Rt Hon Roy Mason MP The Rt Hon Bruce MiUan MP ^retar y of State for Northern Ireland Secretary of State for Scotland Rt Hon John Morris QC MP The Rt Hon Fred Mulley MP ^*etary of State for WaleB Secretary of State for Defence ^ * Rt Hon Albert Booth MP The Rt Hon David Ennals MP ^retar y of State for Employment Secretary of State for Social Services Rt Hon Edmund Dell MP The Rt Hon Lord Peart "***etary of State for Trade Lord Privy Seal The Rt Hon John Silk in MP The Rt Hon Roy Hattersley MP Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Secretary of State fo-.* Prices and Consumer Protection ^ e Rt Hon William Rodgers MP The Rt Hon Stanley Orme MP S*cretary of State for Transport Minister for Social Security The Rt Hon Harold Lever MP Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster THE FOLLOWING WERE ALSO PRESENT ^ e Rt Hon Michael Cocks MP The Rt Hon Joel Barnett MP 5**liamentary Secretary, Treasury Chief Secretary, Treasury (Items 2-5) Weais 1-4) SECRETARIAT Sir John Hunt Mr W I Mclndoe (Item 1) Mr D le B Jones (Items 2-5) Mr J A Marshall (Items 3-5) Mr A D Gordon-Brown (Item 1) Mr C J Farrow (Item 2) CONTENT S *em Page Subject 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Party Leaders and Officials Since 1975
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 07154, 6 February 2020 Conservative Party and Compiled by officials since 1975 Sarah Dobson This List notes Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975. Further reading Conservative Party website Conservative Party structure and organisation [pdf] Constitution of the Conservative Party: includes leadership election rules and procedures for selecting candidates. Oliver Letwin, Hearts and Minds: The Battle for the Conservative Party from Thatcher to the Present, Biteback, 2017 Tim Bale, The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron, Polity Press, 2016 Robert Blake, The Conservative Party from Peel to Major, Faber & Faber, 2011 Leadership elections The Commons Library briefing Leadership Elections: Conservative Party, 11 July 2016, looks at the current and previous rules for the election of the leader of the Conservative Party. Current state of the parties The current composition of the House of Commons and links to the websites of all the parties represented in the Commons can be found on the Parliament website: current state of the parties. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Conservative Party leaders and officials since 1975 Leader start end Margaret Thatcher Feb 1975 Nov 1990 John Major Nov 1990 Jun 1997 William Hague Jun 1997 Sep 2001 Iain Duncan Smith Sep 2001 Nov 2003 Michael Howard Nov 2003 Dec 2005 David Cameron Dec 2005 Jul 2016 Theresa May Jul 2016 Jun 2019 Boris Johnson Jul 2019 present Deputy Leader # start end William Whitelaw Feb 1975 Aug 1991 Peter Lilley Jun 1998 Jun 1999 Michael Ancram Sep 2001 Dec 2005 George Osborne * Dec 2005 July 2016 William Hague * Dec 2009 May 2015 # There has not always been a deputy leader and it is often an official title of a senior Conservative politician.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book (PDF)
    01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 1 11-05-19 13:21:24 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Veröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts London Publications of the German Historical Institute London 01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 2 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Veröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts London Herausgegeben von Hagen Schulze Band 53 Publications of the German Historical Institute London Edited by Hagen Schulze Volume 53 R. Oldenbourg Verlag München 2002 01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 3 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Dominik Geppert Thatchers konservative Revolution Der Richtungswandel der britischen Tories 1975–1979 R. Oldenbourg Verlag München 2002 01-Titelei.Buch : 01-Titelei 4 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Meinen Eltern Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Geppert, Dominik: Thatchers konservative Revolution : der Richtungswandel der britischen Tories 1975 - 1979 / Dominik Geppert. - München : Oldenbourg, 2002 (Veröffentlichungen des Deutschen Historischen Instituts London ; Bd. 53) Zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss., 2000 ISBN 3-486-56661-X © 2002 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, München Rosenheimer Straße 145, D - 81671 München Internet: http://www.oldenbourg-verlag.de Das Werk einschließlich aller Abbildungen ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Ver- wertung außerhalb der Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Dies gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Über- setzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Bearbeitung in elektroni- schen Systemen. Umschlaggestaltung: Dieter Vollendorf, München Gedruckt auf säurefreiem, alterungsbeständigem Papier (chlorfrei gebleicht). Gesamtherstellung: R. Oldenbourg Graphische Betriebe Druckerei GmbH, München ISBN 3-486-56661-X 01-Titelei.Buch : 02-Inhalt 5 11-05-19 13:21:25 -po1- Benutzer fuer PageOne Inhalt 5 INHALT EINLEITUNG...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Barnett to Be Awarded Freedom of the Borough
    Apr 15, 2014 13:22 BST Lord Barnett to be awarded Freedom of the Borough Plans are being finalised for a ceremony to mark the distinguished career of former Heywood and Royton MP, the Right Honourable Lord Joel Barnett, who is to become a Freeman of the Borough later this month, the highest honour the council can bestow on an individual or group. Earlier this year councillors at Rochdale Town Hall agreed to honour Lord Barnett from Heywood for his service to the people of the borough through his political career. Born on 14 October 1923, Joel Barnett worked as an accountant before being elected onto Prestwich Borough Council. He was elected Member of Parliament for Heywood and Royton in 1964 and served as Chief Secretary to the Treasury from 1974 to 1979, gaining a seat in the cabinet from 1977 onwards in the Callaghan Government. Lord Barnett also acted as shadow spokesperson for business, innovation and skills from 1970 to 1974. In 1983, he was made a life peer as Baron Barnett, of Heywood and Royton. The ceremony will take place at Rochdale Town Hall on St George’s Day – Wednesday 23 April. Deputy Chief Executive Linda Fisher said the council want to recognise the significant impact he made to local and national life during his career: “Councillors were unanimous in their support of this honour. The Freedom of the Borough is only awarded to local people who have made a significant contribution to the locality or have achieved something outstanding.” Head to rochdale.gov.uk Rochdale Borough Council - We are a council which builds success and prosperity with our citizens and partners, whilst protecting our vulnerable people.
    [Show full text]
  • Wales's Fiscal Future
    101 Wales’s Fiscal Future Eurfyl ap Gwilym In this paper I give a high-level description of how the revenue of government in Wales, and in particular the Welsh Government, is raised, the pattern of public spending, and sources of taxation. I then go on to anticipate the fiscal changes that could well take place in Wales in the coming years. Constitutional developments Fiscal developments in Wales, and by this is meant developments in taxation and public spending, cannot be divorced from the wider context of constitutional changes. Such developments are by their nature slow but, as will be seen, measured against the wider sweep of Welsh history, the last sixty years have witnessed rapid and accelerating change. In 1951, David Maxwell Fyffe was appointed as the first United Kingdom government minister with responsibility for Wales. In 1964, James Griffiths, the veteran MP for Llanelli, become the first Secretary of State for Wales with a seat in the United Kingdom cabinet. Initially, the responsibilities of the Secretary of State were very limited but over time, as so often happen in such cases, additional responsibilities were devolved. However, while the Welsh Office was responsible for spending on decentralized programmes, the Secretary of State had no powers over taxation or borrowing. The funds allocated by the United Kingdom government to pay for decentralized public services were the result of negotiations between the Treasury and the Welsh Office. Thus the arrangements were similar to that for other United Kingdom departments of state where every year departmental ministers would negotiate their budgets with the Treasury, which had responsibility for the overall macroeconomic framework.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Effects of Devolution on Union-Wide Engagement in Politics
    Devolution and Disengagement in the United Kingdom: A Study on the Effects of Devolution on Union-Wide Engagement in Politics Hannah Scheckelhoff Honors Thesis Dr. James Allan (advisor) with Edward Hasecke and James F. Smith 18 April 2011 Scheckelhoff 2 Introduction Devolution, the process by which both Wales and Scotland were granted their own regional assemblies, has drastically changed the nature of government, politics, and culture in the United Kingdom in the last decade. As extensive debate over the logistics of devolution continues years after the first election— including everything from calls for increased power for regional governments in Scotland and Wales to demands for changes that would balance out the asymmetry of the new UK governing structures— there are increasingly concerns that devolution has not done all it was supposed to. The result of years of protest and attempts at legislation, devolution aimed to quell the increasingly nationalist sentiments of Scotland and Wales, both of which were growing restless in their positions of subordination the United Kingdom. Yet, in 2011, twelve years after the devolved governments’ first elections, it is clear that these nationalist sentiments have not been at all repressed by this change in governance. Both Plaid Cymru and the Scottish Nationalist Party, both major nationalist (read pro-regionalist pro-independence) parties in their given regions, have held substantial if not focal power over these devolved governments since their inception, and increasingly these parties bring up issues of independence from the United Kingdom. This trend speaks to a more specific concern about the purpose and aspirations of devolution by those who implemented it.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Iain Mclean
    Finance Committee Review of the Budget Process Submission from Professor Iain McLean General remarks 1. I am Professor of Politics and a Fellow of Nuffield College, Oxford University. I have published extensively on UK public policy, with a specialism in public finance; Barnett and possible alternatives; and equity and efficiency issues in devolution finance. Full details of my publications are here. 2. I am a member of the newly announced Independent Expert Group which is to report on finance issues to the Calman Commission. 3. I am completing a pamphlet with colleagues at the Institute for Public Policy Research on Barnett and alternatives to it. Because it is relevant to many of the issues raised in your Consultation Paper, I attach an early version, omitting the tables (which are irrelevant to your inquiry). This version is attached in order to give a slightly longer account of how Barnett works and some of its problems than is possible in a Written Evidence document like this. 4. Your consultation questions assume not only that Scotland remains within the United Kingdom, but that essentially the present (‘Barnett’) block-and-formula arrangements continue. 5. I take no position on whether Scottish independence is good or bad, but it would clearly eliminate the problems that your consultation paper addresses. 6. However, your consultation paper reveals deep-seated problems with the Barnett1 regime. I do not think that the first two of the four CSG principles listed in your paper at para 10 can be implemented under the current regime, viz: • power should be shared between the people of Scotland, the Parliament and the Scottish Executive; • the Parliament should be accountable to the people of Scotland; 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford DNB: January 2021
    Oxford DNB: January 2021 Welcome to the seventieth update of the Oxford DNB, which adds biographies of 241 individuals who died in the year 2017: 224 with their own entries and seventeen added to existing entries as 'co-subjects'. Of these new inclusions, the earliest born is the journalist Clare Hollingworth (1911-2017) and the latest born is the artist and photographer Khadija Saye (1992- 2017). Hollingworth is one of five centenarians included in this update, and Saye one of thirty-four new subjects born after the Second World War. The vast majority (169, or over 70%) were born in the 1920s and 1930s. Sixty-three of the new subjects who died in 2017 (or just over 26% of the cohort) are women. Twenty of the new subjects were themselves contributors to the dictionary. Forty-five of the new articles include portrait images. From January 2021, the Oxford DNB offers biographies of 64,071 men and women who have shaped the British past, contained in 61,745 articles. 11,870 biographies include a portrait image of the subject—researched in partnership with the National Portrait Gallery, London. As ever, we have a free selection of these new entries, together with a full list of the new biographies. Most public libraries across the UK subscribe to the Oxford DNB, which means you can access the complete dictionary for free via your local library. Libraries offer 'remote access' that enables you to log in at any time at home (or anywhere you have internet access). Elsewhere the Oxford DNB is available online in schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Holding Government to Account—150 Years of the Committee of Public
    Holding Government to Account 150 years of the Committee of Public Accounts 1857 – 2007 The Committee of Public Accounts would like to acknowledge the use of a number of sources in the preparation of this document. In particular, it has drawn heavily on “The Control of Public Expenditure: Financial Committees of the House of Commons” by Basil Chubb (Oxford 1952) and made use of “The Accountability and Audit of Governments” by E L Normanton (Manchester University Press 1966), “Harold Wilson’’ by Ben Pimlott (Harper Collins 1993) and ‘‘Westminster: Does Parliament Work?’’ by John Garrett (Victor Gollancz Ltd 1992) and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford University Press, 2007). We are grateful for the assistance of the National Audit Office in preparing this history and the House of Commons Library for supplying invaluable reference material. Holding Government to Account 150 years of the Committee of Public Accounts 1857 – 2007 ‘‘That there shall be a standing Committee to be designated ’’The Committee of Public Accounts’’; for the examination of the Accounts showing the appropriation of sums granted by Parliament to meet the Public Expenditure, to consist of‘‘ nine members, who shall be nominated at the commencement of every Session, and of whom five shall be a quorum. 31 March 1862 Houses of Parliament 1860 As current Chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts, I am delighted to present this short history, which has been prepared to celebrate 150 years of the Committee. History should continue to inform the present. This booklet reminds us of the contemporary relevance of the centuries old desire to strengthen Parliamentary scrutiny over the public finances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barnett Formula
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on the Barnett Formula 1st Report of Session 2008–09 The Barnett Formula Report with Evidence Ordered to be printed 9 July 2009 and published 17 July 2009 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London: The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 139 The Barnett Formula Committee The Select Committee on the Barnett Formula was appointed by the House of Lords on 10 December 2008 with the orders of reference “To examine the purpose, methodology and application of the Barnett Formula as a means of determining funding for the Devolved Administrations of the United Kingdom, to assess the effectiveness of the calculation mechanism to meet its purpose and to consider alternative mechanisms. These orders of reference exclude consideration of three main areas: The overall system of funding the Devolved Administrations – in particular the question of whether greater tax-raising powers should be accorded to the devolved administrations; Other political aspects of the devolution settlements; and The distribution of funds within the different regions of the United Kingdom”. Membership Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Baroness Hollis of Heigham Lord Lang of Monkton Lord Lawson of Blaby Earl of Mar and Kellie Lord Moser Lord Richard (Chairman) Lord Rooker Lord Rowe-Beddoe Lord Sewel Lord Smith of Clifton Lord Trimble Mr Alan Trench, Research Fellow in the School of Law at the University of Edinburgh and Mr Peter Kenway, Director of the New Policy Institute, were appointed as Specialist Advisers for the inquiry. Information about the Committee and Publications Information about the Select Committee on the Barnett Formula can be found on the internet at http://www.parliament.uk/hlbarnettformula.
    [Show full text]
  • Christine Keeler and Me JERRY HAYES 12 John Bercow’S Unspeakable Memoirs
    ME ER M M B E R R O S F H S O N U S O E M Order! Order! OF COM The Official Journal of the Association of Former Members of Parliament SPRING 2020 ALSO IN THIS EDITION... NICHOLAS BENNETT 6 Number crunching the General Election TERESA PEARCE 7 The abuse MPs suffer threatens democracy IVAN LAWRENCE 11 How the National Lottery began Christine Keeler and ME JERRY HAYES 12 John Bercow’s Unspeakable memoirs Two former MPs remember the young woman at the centre of the Sixties sex scandal p. 4 & 5 Order! Order! Spring 2020 Note From the Editor By Andy McSmith here are 165 more former MPs than before, and that the Conservatives were Parliamentary Constituencies – now in Tthere were since the last issue of Order likely to benefit from “having sucked at its 27th edition – at a 50 % discount for Order, many of whom were not expecting the pool of Brexit support”. Association members. their circumstances to change so suddenly. He added that – ominously for Labour * * * Five who were, because they chose to – the single word that cropped up most n a magazine written and read by stand down, have contributed to the on the doorstep was ‘Corbyn’, and the Iformer MPs, the books reviewed in the current issue. Many thanks to Stephen most common phrases were “this time” back are all about politics. But late last Pound – whose father, Pelham Pound, and “not this time” – but he detected year I received one delightful book by is pictured on the front cover, with his signs that Labour was retaking some of that polymath ex-MP, Gyles Brandreth friend Stephen Ward – Jeremy Lefroy, the Remain vote back off the Liberal – Dancing by the Light of the Moon, How Teresa Pearce, Paul Farrelly and Sarah Democrats.
    [Show full text]