Evolution of a musical style: Stylistic transitions in Vivier’s first works i MartineRhéaume DepartmentofMusic,UniversityofMontreal,Canada martine.rheaume_at_umontreal.ca In:M.M.Marin,M.Knoche,&R.Parncutt(Eds.) ProceedingsoftheFirstInternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicology(SysMus08) Graz,Austria,1415November2008,http://www.unigraz.at/muwi3www/SysMus08 Background. In Music, the Arts, and Ideas , Leonard Meyer states the internal dynamics hypothesis in the transformationofamusicalstyle:astyleemergesgraduallyand,thus,isn’ttheproductofaspecificdecision;astyle is learned ,evenbythecomposerswhoinventit,andlistenerslearninaswell. A personal style can also be understood through its influences, be it from individuals or from culture in general. Accounts of influences on Canadian composer Claude Vivier’s (19481983) music are numerous: Tremblay (2000) spotstracesofStockhausen,gamelan,andMessiaen;Braes(2001)unveilslinksbetweenStockhausen’s and Vivier’s Orion ;andGilmore(2007)accountsforinfluenceofspectralmusiconVivier’s Lonely Child . Aims. SinceVivier’sstyleisoftendescribedbyitsinfluences,Iaimtoshednewlightontoitbyexplainingitsinternal process. How does Vivier go from one work to another? What are the choices he makes in each work and that he modifies from one another, on a given period of time? This is what I aim to understand in analysing the melodic parameterinthemusicofClaudeVivier.Inthispaper,IamgoingthroughtheinternaldynamicsofVivier’semerging melodicstyleinfivevocalworkscomposedbetween1973and1975:Chants, O! Kosmos, Jesus erbarme dich, Lettura di Dante and an die Nacht ,analysedinthechronologicalorderoftheircomposition. Main contribution. Afterabriefsummaryofparadigmaticanalysis(Ruwet,1972;Nattiez,2003)ofthefiveworks showingtheysharemuchofthesamemelodicmaterial,Ifollowtheevolutionalpathofasimpleyetverysignificant musical formula, i.e. a motive constantly repeated and transformed throughout the works. By observing the transformationofthisspecificformulaintoeachworkandfromonetoanother,Ishowamicrocosmoftheevolutionof Vivier’smelodicstyle:averysimpleformulaisusedtostructureentiresectionsofeachwork;itevolvesintomore complicated and implicative states, yet simpler versions can still be found. Complexity is by no means a goal in Vivier’sstyle,butmerelyapassingstate. personal expression through recurring choices. However, when one wants to Lestylen’estrien,maisrienn’estsanslestyle. understand a specific style, declaring it (Rivarol) impalpable cannot be an option; too much Style is nothing, but nothing is without style. research would end right where it started: “style is nothing”. Thus, by observing the Lestyleestlavolontédes’extérioriserpardes meansbywhichacomposer choses tocreate moyenschoisis.(MaxJacob) a work or a corpus of works, it may become Style is the willingness to exteriorize oneself by possibletounderstandwhatitisthatisbeing chosen means . exteriorized. How does Canadian composer Claude Vivier ii Quite often, an aphorism will generate as proceedfromoneworktoanother?Whatare muchormoresensethantherewouldbeina the choices he makes in each work and that muchmorethoroughtheoretictext.Thisisso he modifies from one to the next, over a because of the simplicity of the formula; its given period of time? What are the succinct aspect makes each term more compositional processes that he uses, keeps important and fruitful for reflection and and transforms from one work to another? imagination. The definitions of “style” as a ThisiswhatIaimtounderstandinanalyzing notion,betheygenericorspecificallyrelated themelodicparameterinthemusicofClaude to art and music, are not too far from the Vivier in a wider ranging research goal that aphorismsofRivarolandMaxJacob:stylecan includes the results discussed in the article be the object of a value judgment, since that follows. In this project, I attempt to “nothing is without style”; style is a form of reconstitute the stylistic evolution of Claude

72 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

Vivier’s musical language in an endogenetic 2001) who unveils links between view, based on the assumption that music Stockhausen’s Mantra andVivier’s Orion ;and can generate music, and that style evolves in an article by Bob Gilmore ( Tempo , 2007) throughaninternaldynamicprocessthatcan accountingfortheinfluenceofspectralmusic be identified and explained. I observe on Vivier’s Lonely Child . Further accounts of changes of style matter that can be noticed variousinfluencesareforthcominginanissue fromoneworktothenextandcompilethem of Circuit devoted to Vivier’s music, to be chronologically,thustryingtoreconstitutethe published in 2008. In light of this well logic of compositional choices that allowed supported evidence, it would be reckless to Vivier’s style to evolve. The internal dynamic state that Vivier’s style is solely the product process of Vivier's early melodic style is of internal development. Moreover, analysed here through five vocal works musicological literature on musical style is composed between 1973 and 1975: Chants, very clear about the fact that no style O! Kosmos, Jesus erbarme dich , Lettura di whatsoever is hermetic to its sociocultural Dante and Hymnen an die Nacht . environment. The analysis of Vivier’s style through its internal process simply offers an Following a brief summary of the alternateviewforitsunderstanding. paradigmaticanalysisofthefiveworkswhich highlights the similarities and differences betweenthem, Iwilldescribethe evolutional Five works, eleven formulae path of a simple yet very significant musical formulaamongthoseworks.Byobservingthe When applied to an appropriate corpus of transformationofthisspecificformulaineach works, paradigmatic analysis is a very workandfromonetoanother,wewitnessa revealing tool of compositional process. This microcosmoftheevolutionofVivier’smelodic analysis method is based on anthropologist style. Claude LéviStrauss’ myths analysis. It has been applied to musicby French linguist and musicologist Nicolas Ruwet (1972) for the Internal development and analysisofmonody,andthenquitedeveloped external influences: by JeanJacques Nattiez (2003). Without reconcilable views going too much into details that are thoroughly explained elsewhere, the In an interview published more than fifteen paradigmatic analysis of a work is made by years ago in the music journal Circuit , the locating repetitions of signifying musical late György Ligeti spoke of Vivier in these elements–beitmotifs,cellsorideas–and words: “what strikes me most in Claude by laying them out in columns (one column Vivier’s music is his completely original for each melodic element including one or musicalgenius. He was alone despite various more repetitions and/or transformations influences ,andhewasabletobringtolifehis between related melodic segments). The multicoloured sonic imagination better than score remains legible from left to right, with anybody(ever)could.” iii (1991,p.15,italics blanks spaces used as a simple graphic and translation are mine). By trying to spacingelementratherthanarepresentation understandtheendogeneticaspectofVivier’s oftemporalvalue.Theseanalysesarevisually musical style, I do not aim to deny the instructivesincetheyallowtograspawork’s musical influences present in his music, but formatasingleglance,whilemaintainingthe rather to understand how, in the words of linear temporal evolution inherent to music. Ligeti,hewas alone . However,theytakeupalotofspace,sincea Accounts of influences on Vivier’s music are score is present integrally, and quite spaced. numerous, namely in an article by Jacques This is why no paradigmatic analysis of a Tremblay( Circuit ,2000),whospotstracesof complete work is given in this article, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Balinese gamelan, althoughlargeexcerptswillbegivenlateron. MontrealcomposerandMessiaen’spupilGilles By connecting paradigmatic analysis of Tremblay as well as Messiaen himself; in an Chants , Jesus erbarme dich , O! Kosmos, article by Ross Braes ( Discourses on Music , Lettura di Dante and Hymnen an die Nacht ,I

73 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

have identified something fascinating: eleven syntax, and the impression of either closure paradigmatic formulae – that is, eleven or surprise following musical events that can columns of a paradigmatic table – are be created, depending on whether they are sufficient to account for the melodic concordant with the implication or not. In repetitions that can be found in these five order to allow better understanding of the works. In other words, the melodic elements implications that can be generated by which that are subject to repetition and types of musical events, Meyer gives in transformation in these five works can be Explaining Music a taxonomy of melodic describedwiththesameformulae.Thus,they structures. In his definition of what share, in some way, the same musical constitutes an axial , he writes: material. After a brief overview of their “Implication is absent because, since axial individual structures, this discussion follows are essentially prolongations of a the path of one of these formulae from one single tone, no highlevel processive work to the next. This is an example of the relationships are possible.” (1973, p. 183). approachIintendtoapplytothewholebody Yet, Vivier uses melodies prolonging a single ofVivier’sworks. note, or two notes, in a structural manner, thusjustifyingthespecifictaxonomyofstatic Chants melodicstructuresthatfollows. (Sevenfemalevoicesandpercussion) Amongstaticmelodicstructuresinthesefive This work of little more than twenty minutes works, one finds: axial melodies (turning in length was composed in Köln in 1973, around a central tone), oscillating melodies while Vivier was studying with Karlheinz (alternatingbetweentwotones)andconstant Stockhausen. According to Vivier himself, melodies, discrete or sustained (i.e. on a “thisworks represents theveryfirstmoment single tone, repeated or held) v. In Chants , of my existence as a composer” iv (1991, p. oscillating and constant melodies are the 55,mytranslation).Itisthefirstofhisworks mostimportant.Indeed,theworkstartswith inwhichonecanfindmostofthethemesthat aminorthird,Bflat–G,thatwillbefoundas are to become central to his artistic is or transposed throughout the piece, with sensibility.Eventhoughthesethemesarenot special emphasis on B flat, that Vivier brings the focus in this discussion, it is still back like a recitation tone. The minor third important to acknowledge their presence. has been assigned to the A formula of the Even more so because they manifest paradigmatic analysis. Oscillating seconds, themselves at the same moment as do the major and minor, are common enough foundationsofhispersonalmusicalstyle.Let throughoutthepiecetobecometheBformula us recall that the French word "chant" does of the analysis. Finally, constant melodies, not translate into "chant" in English, but discrete or sustained, have the most rather "song" or "singing". In Vivier’s mind, prominent role in the work; it is the D Chants is a requiem, or at the very least a formula. The two latter formulae are, among ritual;thetextishisandspeaksofchildhood, the eleven that can be found in Chants , death,andthematernalfigure,withpassages nothing less than the very structure of the in a “language” of his own invention (from piece, from beginning to end. Figures 1 to 3 now on referred to as “invented language”) showsamplesofthesethreeformulae. and excerpts of the Roman Catholic Funeral Liturgy. In this piece, Vivier exploits various ways of creating static melodic outlines, meaningmelodicformulaethatimplynothing Figure 1. Aformula. Chants ,m.81,soprano1. butthemselvesortheirowncontinuationand don’t create significant musical implications for the listener. Here, I am referring to Leonard Meyer's theories, based on the implicative relationships between musical events that can be perceived by listeners Figure 2. Bformula. Chants ,m.83,soprano1. acquainted with or acculturated to a musical

74 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

Figure 3. Dformula. Chants ,mm.7174,soprano1. with a quite rhythmic semitone oscillation in the bass that introduces an exchange Paradigmatic analysis of Chants shows a between the choir and the soloist. The choir block structure, sections of the work being singsadiscreteconstantmotifonthesyllable often dominated by the presence, multiple “Je”, to which the soprano answers by the repetitions and transformations of a single syllable “sus” a minor third above. Note in formula. It is the case for the B formula in figure 5 that the time signatures of the measures 167 to 173, followed by a section measuressungbythechoirtuttipresentthe centeredontheDformula,measures178to series8/4,5/4,3/4,2/4,1/4,beingthefirst 191. A section can also be structured “by fivevaluesoftheFibonacciseriesbackwards, interblock”, meaning that it is centered on whilethesoloistrespondsinmeasuresinthe two alternating formulae, for example same time signatures, in regular order. The between measures 119 and 135. However, Fibonacciserieshascloselinkstothegolden despite these block structures constituted by number(orgoldenratio),consideredofdivine static melodic outlines – that successfully proportions, found both in art and nature. create the ritual effect intended by Vivier – Combined with the subject of the work and some recognizable melodic contours further theternaryform,Catholicsymbolofaperfect attractthelistener'sattention.Amongthese, whole(theHolyTrinity),itisagoodexample theinitialmelodyofthesecondsectionofthe Vivier's mysticism. The work ends like it workisworthnoting(figure4). began, with an oscillating minor second for thesopranosoloist. In the description above, paradigmatic formulae appear clearly: the B formula “oscillating minor second”, the A formula “oscillating minor third”, and the D formula, Figure 4 . Chants ,mm.2728,soprano1. “repeated notes” (discrete constant) are present. Yet, it is fascinating to see that, in Jesus erbarme dich analyzing this work, the paradigmatic (SATBchoirandsoprano) formulaearethesameaseightoftheeleven formulae found in Chants . But they are This work of about three minutes, a tangible treated in a much simpler manner: the example of the importance of the Catholic oscillations of minor seconds are longer, in faithinVivier’slife,islikea kyrie inGerman. more regular rhythms, and the repeated Vivier uses a single phrase “Jesus erbarme notesarepresentedinequalrhythmicvalues. dich” “Jesus have pity” as the only lyrics of the piece (excepting the syllables “tutati”), Wemustresistthetemptationtoinsinuate– in a ternary structure, with a first section whichcouldseemlegitimatesincebothworks based on the semitone (first an oscillation werefinishedin1973andwedon’tknowthe betweenAandBflat,soontransposedtoF– exactcompositiondates–butwemustresist Gflat).Thesecondsectionoftheworkstarts howeverthetemptationtoinsinuatethatthis work should , by its simplicity, have been

Figure 5. Jesus erbarme dich ,mm.2029,sopraniand sopranosolo

75 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

composed before Chants , chronologically. It Hymnen an die Nacht wouldbeamisunderstandingofbothVivier’s (sopranoandpiano) style and this article's aim to grasp the evolution of a musical language and style. A This work composed in Montreal for the misunderstanding of Vivier because he had “Stepping Stone” competition of the Canada alreadycomposedverycomplexworksbefore Music Competition in 1975 brings into music Chants , often mathematically predetermined. thefirstrhymesofNovalis’fifth Hymn to the A misunderstanding of the evolution because Night . Even though he didn’t start to speak it is not an evolution from a simple to a before age six, Vivier was eager to learn complex state, from a primitive to an ideal languages – he spoke French, English, state, but rather change from an existing German,andBalinese–butwasnotsokeen statetoanother. ongrammar,whichisprobablywhyhedidn’t change the word “Hymnen” to its singular O! Kosmos form. This work shows a block structure, (SATBchoir) underlined by a somewhat ternary form. The first section is made of static formulae, TheCosmosalsohaveafundamentalplacein alternatingbetweenthelongsustainedtones the list of Vivier’s themes. The term can be of the D formula and grand pauses. Those found in his vocal works as well as in his long silences have their own paradigmatic writings;heoftensaidhewantedtomeltinto formula, in this work as well as the others it,tobecomeonewithit.Thelyricsofthis7 treated here, mainly because they are very minute work composed in Köln in 1973 are present. The importance of silence as a Vivier’sownandappealtotheforthcomingof communicative part of musical language has an apocalyptic non linear time. The block been discussed in relation to the music of structure is less important here than in Debussy,WebernorStravinsky,butitdoesn't preceding works, which leaves space for the alwayshavethesamefunction.Itdependson presence of the B formula “oscillating whatcomesbeforeandafter.Inthefirstpart seconds” and the D formula “constant of Hymnen an die Nacht , the alternation melody”, discrete and sustained. Its melodic between long silence and long sustained material can be placed under nine of the tones prolongs their static effect (see figure elevenformulaepresentedin Chants . 7), while creating great implications in the central section (see figure 8). These two Lettura di Dante functionsofsilencearesharedbythekindof (soprano, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, trumpet, melodic structures present in these sections: trombone,violaandpercussion) static melodies of the D formula alternating Withaquitedifferentinstrumentation, Lettura with long silences, opposed in blocks, di Dante isafirstattemptonVivier'spartat structure the first section. More implicative taking the unbeaten path of timbre melodies, with characteristic outlines, form juxtaposition. His use of still limited melodic theblocksofthecentralsection. formulae is very much similar as the preceding works, but the offers more possibilities, in terms of Klangfarben- melodie , for example. This 26minutes work wouldbealotliketheprecedingworkwith the oscillating intervals, the long held notes, the block structures if it were not for its principal melody that is gradually stated. It consists, unsurprisingly, of long held notes united by intervals (see figure 6) that are elsewhererepeatedandoscillated.

Figure 6. Principalmelody, Lettura di Dante ,mm.31 34,soprano.

76 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

Figure 7. Hymnen an die Nacht ,mm.14, soprano. Figure 8.Hymnen an die Nacht ,mm.3639,soprano. The Path of a Formula applied to a previously heard sustained constantmelody.“Monnayage”simplymeans In the general description of the works and theactofchangingabillintocoins,changing paradigmatic analyses above, some formulae a whole note into eighth notes, for example. arediscussedmorethanothers,whichisnot This “D formula”is transformed within works an unmeditated choice. The process in andfromonetoanother,representinginthis establishing paradigmatic formulae is the group of works a primary stylistic element following.Onefindsthemeaningfulelements whose path is interesting to follow. With the of a work that are repeated and/or very first measures of Chants , a first transformed. For practical reasons, those analytical problem is already presented (see formulaearegivenletternames,accordingto figure 9). Into which formula it fits is theirorderofappearanceinthework.Hence, ambiguous.Isitafirstminorthirdstartingon there is no hierarchical superiority between Bflat(oscillatingminorthirdistheAformula, formulae A and B, for example. In fact, the an important one in Chants ), or a first experience of analysis shows the statistical occurrenceofrepeatednotes,relatedtotheD importance of the D formula, constituted, as formula? By trying to solve this practical seen above, by long single notes or by problem,oneunderstandsanessentialnotion successive repetitionsofasinglenote,which ofVivier’sstyle:thesetwofirstmeasuresare I name “sustained constant melody” and vi thekernel–intermsofmelodicformulae–of “discrete constant melody” . They are the imposing work that is just beginning, to grouped under the same formula since a beconsideredasaprecursortobothAandD discreteconstantmelodyoftencomesfroma formulae. There are few repeated notes, yet processthatinFrenchiscalled“monnayage” they are present. This first measure doesn’t imply solely that the work will be structured by constant melodies, but the listener is at the very least prepared to expect it. The D formula is foreshadowed here before its cleareroccurrenceafewmeasureslater. Figure 9.Chants, mm.13, soprano1.

77 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

Figure 10. Chants, mm.45 46,mezzo soprano

Theformulaisheardlateraswell,whetheras The block structure of the pieces have come a discrete constant repeated on the same upafewtimesinthisarticle,andnowisthe rhythmic value (figure 10), or by combining time to demonstrate, by an excerpt of sustained and discrete constant melodies paradigmatic analysis, how those blocks are (figure 11). While being subject to internal structured. In figure 14, the D formula transformations, the formula is used to put predominates in the entire section, before forward the significanttones of Chants , be it alternatingwiththeBformula(m.205). the B flat (figures 9 and 10), or the Finally,inanoutstandingsynthesisonVivier’s melodic summits (figure 12). By part, all morphologies of the D formula are strengthening the pole tones and melodic heardattheendofthepiece(figure15):the summit with long rhythmic values, Vivier final occurrence of the melodic summit (fig. combines two melodic structural elements; 14, ∂ symbol) and of the lower melodic tone theimportanceoftheformulaandthatofthe (ßsymbol),inablockstructuredbytheD poletoneamplifyoneanother. Figure 11 .Chants ,mm.138 139,soprano. Figure 12 .Chants ,mm.141 147,soprano.

Figure 13 .Chants ,mm.181 188,soprano. Theformulacomestoitsfullestbloominvery formula (∆ symbol), in very long rhythmic long rhythmic values. In figure 13, the values(πsymbol),andindiminutioninequal formula comes to a temporal melodic (*symbol)andunequal(symbol)rhythmic importance it didn’t have before, with notes values. This synthesis of the formula will be heldforalittlemorethan11beats,13beats, discussedagainintheconclusion. and11beatsagain,withatempomarkingof 75.5atthequarternote.

78 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

Figure 14. Extractfromparadigmaticanalysis, Chants ,mm.197214.

79 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

Figure 15. Extract from paradigmatic analysis, Chants ,mm.215229.

80 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

Whileheardthroughthefewlongnotesatthe The principal melody of Lettura di Dante beginning of Jesus erbarme dich , the D appears 14 times throughout the work in its formula takes an important place with the completeform.Notonlyitisusedasaclassic exchange between the choir and the soloist theme,butalsoasaformalmark:asection discussed above (see figure 5). Note in this of the work usually starts and ends with the example that, as is often the case in Vivier’s principal melody. In this specific work, Vivier vocal music, a repeated note doesn’t applies his tendency to repeat a specific necessarily lead to a repeated syllable. The interval as some kind of faux départ of the singers reattacking the note on the vowel principal melody. Then, the intervals that create somewhat of an echo effect. In this form it (see figure 6) are present and figure, we see a discrete constant melody in oscillated throughout the work, as is the D equal rhythmic values fading in with a formulathatpermeatesit. sustained constant melody. This constitutes, Asfor Hymnen an die Nacht ,themostrecent asmentionnedearlier,asimpletypeofuseof work analyzed here, the D formula is again this formula. However, the way Vivier quiteimportant;itdominatesthefirstsection opposes the two states of the formula – up to measure 32, reappears through the discrete and sustained – in fade in is a new piece, and comes back to end it from waytohandlethisformula.In O! Kosmos ,the measure 49 on. The very first occurrence of useoftheDformularetainsitsrelationshipto theformula(seefigure7,above)staysonthe the works before, through a diminution same note which at this point in the processinunequalrhythmicvalues,eitheron discussionshouldnotbesurprising.However, new syllables or on the same vowel, as we at the third occurrence, already, the note at canalsoseein Jesus erbarme dich .Itisjust the very end of the formula is a semitone thesameformelodicsummit,alsopresented higherthantheheldnote(figure17).Atthe intheshapeoftheDformula.Anewwayof fourth occurrence (figure 18), the repeated treating this formula comes up in measures notes are followed by last two notes, a 19and20(figure16).Arelevantanalysisof diminished fourth lower. These somewhat melody can’t be made in total abstraction of plodding examples nevertheless illustrate the otherparameters,anditwouldbeunfairhere gradual propensity of the D formula, in to consider figure 16 as a simple line A – A Hymnen , going from a constant melody flat–A;thefullnessofthechoir’stimbreand considered as a kernel, and then slowly itslargerdynamicpossibilities,aswellasthe moving away from it, first by conjunct, then harmonic progression whose friction is by more and more disjunct intervals. The resolved on a 7 th majorchord,havealotto possible processing of a constant melody, do with the impression of movement this throughslightvariationsfromoneoccurrence staticmelodicstructuresuddenlytakes. toanother,seemstoreachafinalstatehere, yet it is another stepping stone. Remember that in Vivier's music, a final state doesn't equal an ideal state; Hymnen shows other morphologies of the D formula as well, from the"monnayage"totheblockstructure.

Figure 16. O! Kosmos ,mm.19 20.

81 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

mannerism (high level of information). It would be imprudent to transpose this entire theory onto Vivier's style, since Meyer writes about a style that declines on its own, not abruptly interrupted. However, the internal Figure 17. Hymnen an die Nacht ,mm.89,soprano. dynamicsofanemergingstyleprovideavery enlightening point of view here, since this part of his style cannot be affected by the tragicdeathofthecomposer. Yet,withVivier,anemergingstyleisprecisely what we witness vii . He says so himself about Figure 18. Hymnen an die Nacht ,mm.1314,soprano. Chants , and the change is palpable between thisworkandthosethatwerecomposedright Internal dynamics of a static before it. By repeating a few formulae in melodic formula numerous works, in other words through similar recurring compositional choices from What this analysis teaches us about Claude one work to another, Vivier teaches himself Vivier'sstyleisnotmerelythatthecomposer while teaching us his own style. This would sometimes uses long, sustained tones. The appear to be just what he does at the very first measures of Hymnen an die Nacht beginningof eachpiece. Igavethe example (figure 6) would suffice to demonstrate this of the first measures of Chants and Hymnen observation. It teaches us above all that an die Nacht thatshowevidenceofsuchstyle Vivier structures a considerable number of teaching. I chose to discuss them because works on only a few melodic formulae, and their beginning is filled with the D formula. that they are transformed, complexified, and ButhadIonlychosentofollowthepathofa simplified again . In the chapter "Variety of formulamadebyoscillatingminorseconds, I StyleChange",thelateLeonardMeyer(1994) could have given the same example with states the hypothesis of internal dynamics of Jesus erbarme dich . By following the very a musical style transformation. While he simpleDformula,wewitnessedamicrocosm addresses mostly styles shared by numerous of the evolution of Vivier’s emerging style. composersforexample,thebaroquestyle, The formula consisting of one tone, held or this view of stylistic development can be repeated over a large number of beats, is judiciously applied to the understanding of a transformed in the most subtle, meticulous personal style. According to Meyer, a style ways. These transformations are heard, graduallyemerges,andisnottheresultofa however,alongsideprimitiveorsimplerstates single decision; he thinks a style is learned , of the formula. What Vivier teaches himself even by the composers who invented it ( op. and us is that, in his musical language, the cit. ,p.116)andthelistenerlearnsitaswell. complexityofprocessingofamelodicformula Then,itisnotrare,inanemergentstyle,that is not an ideal state, but merely a possible a musical language would be constituted by state. He wrote something that resonates the redundancy of a single process. As the with this idea, about his work Chants : "At style slowly establishes itself, the composer firstsight,theworkmayseem simple,butit tends toreducethedegreeofredundancyto is more precisely on the level of a subtle introducenewinformation,meaningelements organizationofmusic,ofproportions,thatthe that can surprise the listener already issueofanewsensibilityisgiven" viii (1991,p. acquaintedwiththestyle( op. cit. ,p.114and 56,translationmine).Itseemsthat,justlike 116). The redundancy will tend to decrease in the case of sayings and aphorisms, the while the amount of information will tend to emerging style of Vivier between 1973 and increase, until the style becomes barely 1975residesinthesimplicityoftheformula. unidentifiable. Meyer considers these three phases of a style as a preclassicism (redundancy), classicism (equilibrium between redundancy and information) and

82 SysMus08–InternationalConferenceofStudentsofSystematicMusicologyProceedings

References Vivier, C. (1986). Hymnen an die Nacht . Saint Nicolas:ÉditionsYppan. Braes, R. (2001). "A response to Janette Tilley's EternalRecurrence:AspectsofMelodyinthe Orchestral Music of Claude Vivier", Discourses in Music ,vol.2,no.2,online:< iApreviousversionofthisarticlehasbeenpublishedin http://www.discourses.ca/v2n2a2.html> Frenchin Circuit - musiques contemporaines ,vol.18,no. Gardin,J.C., et al. (1987) La logique du plausible, 3 in 2008. The entire issue is devoted to the music of essais d’épistémologie pratique en sciences Vivier. humaines , Paris, Éditions de la maison des ii Born in Montreal in 1948 to unknown parents and sciences. stabbedtodeathinParisin1983. iii Gilmore, B. (2007). « On Claude Vivier’s ‘Lonely «Cequim'aleplusfrappédanslamusiquedeClaude Vivier est son génie musical tout à fait original. Il était Child’», Tempo ,vol.61,no.239,p.217. seul malgré les différentes influences etilasumieuxque Lévesque, P. (2004). Les voix de Vivier . Master quiconqueréalisersonimaginationsonoremulticolore». thesis.Montreal:McGillUniversity. iv «Cetteœuvrereprésentepourmoilemomentpremier demonexistencedecompositeur». Ligeti, G. and Duchesneau, L. (1991). «Sur la vThisvocabularywillbeexplainedlateron. musique de Claude Vivier», Circuit, revue nord-américaine de musique du XXe siècle , vi These terms come from the notion of "constant" in vol.2,nos12,p.716. mathematics. They are used in this text to specify this type of static melodies that are so important in Vivier's Meyer, L. B. (1994 [1967]). «Variety of Style music: literally, a "monotone" music, on a single tone. Change», Music, the Arts, and Ideas . Sincetheword"monotone"connotesboredomandvalue Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress,p. judgment,itisnecessarytolookforanotherterm.Inan 114à122. essay of practical epistemology, Gardin addresses the questionoflanguageinscientificwritings.Whileinpure Meyer, L. B. (1973). Explaining Music . Berkeley: science, like chemistry, they have their own specific UniversityofCaliforniaPress. language,heasks"Isittrue,isitgoodthatthelanguage Mijnheer, J. and Desjardins, T. (1991). «La of social sciences can be so easily said as 'natural'?" chronologie des œuvres de Claude Vivier: (1987,p.38).Henotices"thenecessarilymetalinguistic character of any expression borrowed from a natural Historisation de la déshistoire», Circuit, e language... The word stress , in a French text about revue nord-américaine de musique du XX psychology, isn't part of the natural French language" siècle ,vol.2,nos12,p.1730. (op. cit. , p. 41). He brings forth examples in which the Nattiez, J.J. (2003). «Modèles linguistiques et natural language is lacking an appropriate vocabulary analyse des structures musicales», Revue (the shades of a color), and in which the natural language is too connotative for a specific use in a de musique des Universités canadiennes , scientificcontext.Inthisresearch,theword"monotone" vol.23,nos12,p.1061. ispreciselyacaseofthelatter,asitwouldhamperthe Ruwet,N.(1972[1965]).«Méthodesd’analyseen precise meaning necessary to understand this analysis. musicologie», Langage, musique, poésie . This is an instance where words usually found in pure sciencescanfostertheaccuracyofananalysis. Paris:Seuil,p.100134. vii Vivier graduates from the Montreal Conservatory in Tremblay, J. (2000). «L’écriture à haute voix: 1970 and studies in Europe between 1971 and 1974. Lonely Child de Claude Vivier», Circuit, Since the works analysed here were composed between musiques contemporaines ,vol.11,no.1,p. 1973 and 1975, there are at the very beginning of his 4567. careerasacomposer. viii Vivier, C. and Robert, V. (1991). «Les écrits de «Àpremièrevue,l’œuvrepeutparaîtresimple[,]mais Claude Vivier», Circuit, revue nord- justementc’estauniveaud’uneorganisationsubtiledela musique, des proportions[,] que l’enjeu d’une nouvelle américaine de musique du XX e siècle ,vol.2, sensibilitésepose». nos12,p.39136. Vivier, C. (1975). Chants . Paris : Éditions musicalestransatlantiques. Vivier, C. (1977). Jesus erbarme dich . Toronto: ChanteclairMusic. Vivier, C. (1977). O ! Kosmos . Toronto: ChanteclairMusic. Vivier, C. (1979). Lettura di Dante . Montreal: Centredemusiquecanadienne.

83