Late Precambrian to Triassic History of the East
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VU Research Portal Late Precambrian to Triassic history of the East European craton: dynamics of sedimentary basin evolution Nikishin, A.M.; Ziegler, P.A.; Stephenson, R.A.; Cloetingh, S.A.P.L.; Furne, A.V.; Fokin, P.A.; Ershov, A.V.; Boloytov, S.N.; Korotaev, M.V.; Alekseev, A.S.; Gorbachev, V.I.; Shipilov, E.V.; Lankreijer, A.C.; Bembinova, E.Y.; Shalimov, I.V. published in Default journal 1996 DOI (link to publisher) 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00228-4 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Nikishin, A. M., Ziegler, P. A., Stephenson, R. A., Cloetingh, S. A. P. L., Furne, A. V., Fokin, P. A., Ershov, A. V., Boloytov, S. N., Korotaev, M. V., Alekseev, A. S., Gorbachev, V. I., Shipilov, E. V., Lankreijer, A. C., Bembinova, E. Y., & Shalimov, I. V. (1996). Late Precambrian to Triassic history of the East European craton: dynamics of sedimentary basin evolution. Default journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00228-4 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 TECTONOPHYSICS ELSEVIER Tectonophysics 268 (1996) 23-63 Late Precambrian to Triassic history of the East European Craton: dynamics of sedimentary basin evolution A.M. Nlkishin• " " a*, , P.A. Ziegler b, R.A. Stephenson c, S.A.P.L. Cloetingh c, A.V. Fume a, P.A. Fokin a, A.V. Ershov a, S.N. Bolotov a, M.V. Korotaev ", A.S. Alekseev a, V.I. Gorbachev d, E.V. Shipilov e, A. Lankreijer c, E.Yu. Bembinova a, I.V. Shalimov a a Geological Faculty, Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 119899 Moscow, Russia b Geological-Palaeontological Institute, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 32, 4056 Basel, Switzerland c Vrije Universiteit, Faculty of Earth Sciences, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HVAmsterdam, Netherlands d NEDRA, Yaroslavl, Russia e Institute of Marine Geophysics, Murmansk, Russia Received 5 September 1995; accepted 31 May 1996 Abstract During its Riphean to Palaeozoic evolution, the East European Craton was affected by rift phases during Early, Middle and Late Riphean, early Vendian, early Palaeozoic, Early Devonian and Middle-Late Devonian times and again at the transition from the Carboniferous to the Permian and the Permian to the Triassic. These main rifting cycles were separated by phases of intraplate compressional tectonics at the transition from the Early to the Middle Riphean, the Middle to the Late Riphean, the Late Riphean to the Vendian, during the mid-Early Cambrian, at the transition from the Cambrian to the Ordovician, the Silurian to the Early Devonian, the Early to the Middle Devonian, the Carboniferous to Permian and the Triassic to the Jurassic. Main rift cycles axe dynamically related to the separation of continental terranes from the margins of the East European Craton and the opening of Atlantic-type palaeo-oceans and/or back-arc basins. Phases of intraplate compression, causing inversion of extensional basins, coincide with the development of collisional belts along the margins of the East European Craton. The origin and evolution of sedimentary basins on the East European Craton was governed by repeatedly changing regional stress fields. Periods of stress field changes coincide with changes in the drift direction, velocity and rotation of the East European plate and its interaction with adjacent plates. Intraplate magmatism was controlled by changes in stress fields and by mantle hot-spot activity. Geodynamieally speaking, different types of magmatism occurred simultaneously. Keywords: East European Craton; palaeotectonics; sedimentary basins; palaeogeography 1. Introduction basins, intraplate tectonic phenomena and for the analysis of the dynamic processes governing them. The East European Craton (EEC) is a classical The EEC is bounded in the east by the Uralian- region for the study of intracratonic sedimentary Novaya Zemlya-Taymyr orogen, to the south by the Scythian and Crimean-Caucasus orogens, to the * Corresponding author. southwest by the Tornquist Line, to the northwest 0040-1951/96/$15.00 Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PIIS0040-1951(96)00228-4 24 A.M. Nikishin et al./Tectonophysics 268 (1996) 23-63 1 2 3 4 5 6 ÷ ! 4 7 * t 4 8 9 "1 10 , ÷ 1 , ~l FENNOSARMATrAN+CRATON,+ + , ~ + • Va,riBcan.fold = . k v v v v v v ~v v v Vv v ~ v v ¢ v v v /_ v v v ~ v 4 v v ( v v v v v v ~ v v v v v Fig. 1. Main provinces of the East European Craton. 1 = Archaean and Early Proterozoic terranes, undivided; 2 = 1.1-0.55 Ga age terranes; 3 = Precambrian terranes, undivided; 4 = early Palaeozoic fold belts; 5 = late Palaeozoic fold belts; 6 = Mesozoic fold belts; 7 = Alpine fold belts; 8 = outlines of East-European Craton; 9 = passive continental margins; 10 = area with very thin continental or oceanic crust. by the Scandinavian Caledonides and to the north vestigated by many researchers, including Shatsky by the oceanic Eurasian Basin (Fig. 1). The EEC (1964), Vinogradov (1969), Bogdanov (1976), is characterized by a Precambrian crystalline base- Bronguleev (1978), Bogdanov and Khain (1981), ment outcropping in the Fennoscandian (Baltic) and Bronguleev (1985), Milanovsky (1987), Ziegler Ukrainian shields and the Voronezh Massif; else- (1989, 1990) and Khain and Seslavinsky (1991). where, this basement is covered by sediments with This paper reviews, on the basis of a set of inter- thicknesses up to 23 km. The Late Precambrian pretative palaeogeographic-palaeotectonic maps and and Phanerozoic evolution of the EEC has been in- supporting basin analysis studies, the Late Precam- A.M. Nikishin et al./Tectonophysics 268 (1996) 23-63 25 brian and Palaeozoic evolution of the EEC. The a large anorogenic rapakivi-granite province devel- dynamics of the evolution of sedimentary basins are oped between 1.65 and 1.55 Ga (Gorbatchev and Bog- analyzed in the framework of processes affecting the danova, 1993). The rapakivi granites of the Ukrainian margins of the craton, resulting from its interaction Shield are 0.1-0.2 Ga older (Shcherbak, 1991; Gor- with adjacent plates. This paper provides the reader batchev and Bogdanova, 1993). with an introduction to our current understanding of The Pechora-Barents Sea basement province is the geology and geodynamics of Eastern Europe. poorly known. The few wells which reached base- ment yield ages ranging from 1.0 to 0.55 Ga (Dedeev 2. Basement provinces and Zaporozhtseva, 1985; Kogaro et al., 1992; Senin, 1993; Shipilov, 1993; Puchkov, 1993). The compos- The Precambrian EEC consists of several base- ite Pechora-Barentsia terrane was probably welded ment provinces which differ in the age of their to Fennosarmatia at the end of the Precambrian (D- consolidation (Fig. 1). The main constituents are: edeev and Zaporozhtseva, 1985; Zonenshain et al., the Early Precambrian Fennosarmatian Craton (ter- 1993; Puchkov, 1993). minology of H. Stille; Milanovsky, 1987); the Goth- The Late Precambrian Northern Taymyr-Sever- ian Sveconorwegian terrane (1.75-1.55 Ga), which naya Zemlya block contains remnants of Cambrian was welded to Fennosarmatia during the Dalslandian flysch, unconformably covered by Ordovician plat- orogeny (1.2-0.9 Ga; Gorbatchev and Bogdanova, form series (Milanovsky, 1987). Reconstruction of 1993); the Late Precambrian Pechora-Barents Sea the early Palaeozoic history of this region is prob- orogenic belt (Pechora-Barentsia), which was ac- lematic; however, it is possible that the Northern creted to the northeastern margin of Fennosarmatia Taymyr-Severnaya Zemlya block was accreted to during Vendian-Early Cambrian times; the Late Pre- the Pechora-Barentsia terrane at the transition from cambrian Taymyr-Severnaya Zemlya terrane, which the Cambrian to the Ordovician. was accreted to the evolving EEC probably at the No reliable age dates are available for the possi- end of the Cambrian (Dedeev and Zaporozhtseva, bly Late Precambrian (Dalslandian?) Astrakhan and 1985; Getsen, 1987; Uflyand et al., 1991; Zonen- Pre-Dobrogea blocks. shain et al., 1993); and the Astrakhan-Peri-Caspian (Nevolin, 1988) and Pre-Dobrogea blocks of pos- 3. Working methods sibly Late Precambrian age (Garetsky, 1990). The palaeo-continent incorporating all these older than The sedimentary cover of the EEC records its Late Early Riphean blocks is here referred to as Baltica. Precambrian and Phanerozoic evolution (Fig. 2). Fennosarmatia is the core of the Baltica palaeo-con- Geophysical and well data provide information on tinent, the outlines of which changed significantly the geometry and deformation of sedimentary basins through time. and permit analysis of their subsidence and uplift The Fennosarmatian craton consists of Archaean histories and of the dynamic processes governing domains and Early Proterozoic