Biological Resources Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Resources Information BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE MPWSP TEMPORARY SLANT TEST WELL PROJECT MARINA, CALIFORNIA Prepared by: Zander Associates 4460 Redwood Hwy, Suite 16-240 San Rafael, CA 94903 Submitted to: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers San Francisco District 1455 Market Street San Francisco, California 94103 On behalf of: RBF Consulting 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 100 Temecula, California 92591 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Threatened or Endangered Species that May Be Affected ............................................... 1 1.3 Critical Habitat ................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 CONSULTATION TO DATE ............................................................................................ 5 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION .............................................................. 6 3.1 Access .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Restricted Construction Area ........................................................................................... 6 3.3 Project Facilities ............................................................................................................... 6 3.3.1 Temporary Slant Test Well and Well-head Facilities ................................................. 9 3.3.2 Monitoring Wells ........................................................................................................ 9 3.3.3 Electrical Power Supply .............................................................................................. 9 3.3.4 Test Water Disposal Facilities .................................................................................... 9 3.4 Project Phasing and Scheduling ..................................................................................... 10 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION AREA ...................................................................... 10 4.1 Location and General Characteristics ............................................................................ 10 4.2 Cemex Operations Area ................................................................................................. 10 4.3 Slant Test Well ............................................................................................................... 12 5.0 SPECIES ACCOUNTS AND STATUS IN THE ACTION AREA ................................. 14 5.1 Smith's Blue Butterfly .................................................................................................... 14 5.1.1 Status and Description .............................................................................................. 14 5.1.2 Distribution and Habitat ............................................................................................ 14 5.1.3 Life History ............................................................................................................... 15 5.1.4 Threats to Survival .................................................................................................... 15 5.1.5 Occurrence within the Action Area .......................................................................... 15 5.2 Western Snowy Plover ................................................................................................... 17 5.2.1 Status and Description .............................................................................................. 17 5.2.2 Distribution and Habitat ............................................................................................ 17 5.2.3 Life History ............................................................................................................... 18 5.2.4 Threats to Survival .................................................................................................... 19 5.2.5 Occurrence within the Action Area .......................................................................... 19 5.3 Yadon's Wallflower ....................................................................................................... 20 5.3.1 Status and Description .............................................................................................. 20 5.3.2 Distribution and Habitat ............................................................................................ 22 5.3.3 Life History ............................................................................................................... 22 5.3.4 Threats to Survival .................................................................................................... 22 5.3.5 Occurrence within the Action Area .......................................................................... 23 5.4 Monterey Gilia ............................................................................................................... 23 5.4.1 Status and Description .............................................................................................. 23 5.4.2 Distribution and Habitat ............................................................................................ 23 i 5.4.3 Life History ............................................................................................................... 24 5.4.4 Threats to Survival .................................................................................................... 24 5.4.5 Occurrence within the Action Area .......................................................................... 24 5.5 Monterey Spineflower .................................................................................................... 25 5.5.1 Status and Description .............................................................................................. 25 5.5.2 Distribution and Habitat ............................................................................................ 25 5.5.3 Life History ............................................................................................................... 25 5.5.4 Threats to Survival .................................................................................................... 26 5.5.5 Occurrence within the Action Area .......................................................................... 26 6.0 POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ON LISTED SPECIES ......... 26 6.1 Effects on Listed Plants.................................................................................................. 26 6.2 Effects on Listed Animals .............................................................................................. 27 6.2.1 Smith’s blue butterfly................................................................................................ 27 6.2.2 Western snowy plover ............................................................................................... 27 6.3 Effects on Critical Habitat ............................................................................................. 28 6.3.1 Monterey spineflower ............................................................................................... 28 6.3.2 Western snowy plover ............................................................................................... 29 7.0 MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES ..................................................... 29 7.1 Monterey Spineflower .................................................................................................... 30 7.1.1 Pre-construction flagging .......................................................................................... 30 7.1.2 Habitat avoidance ...................................................................................................... 30 7.1.3 Timing of construction and operation ....................................................................... 30 7.1.4 Biological resource education and monitoring ......................................................... 30 7.2 Smith’s Blue Butterfly ................................................................................................... 30 7.2.1 Pre-construction surveys ........................................................................................... 30 7.2.2 Avoidance of buckwheat ........................................................................................... 30 7.2.3 Timing of construction and operation ....................................................................... 31 7.2.4 Biological resource education and monitoring ......................................................... 31 7.3 Western Snowy Plover ................................................................................................... 31 7.3.1 Timing of construction and operation ....................................................................... 31 7.3.2 Project siting and configuration ................................................................................ 31 7.3.3 Construction limits .................................................................................................... 31 7.3.4 Trash and fuel management ...................................................................................... 32 7.3.5 Work area recontouring ...........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Improving Habitat Restoration for Native Pollinators in San Francisco Tyrha Delger [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-18-2018 Improving Habitat Restoration for Native Pollinators in San Francisco Tyrha Delger [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Recommended Citation Delger, Tyrha, "Improving Habitat Restoration for Native Pollinators in San Francisco" (2018). Master's Projects and Capstones. 739. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/739 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master’s Project Improving Habitat Restoration for Native Pollinators in San Francisco by Tyrha Delger is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements or the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco Submitted: Received: ……………………………. …………………………….... Your Name Date Allison Luengen, Ph.D. Date Name: Tyrha Delger USF MSEM Master’s Project Spring 2018 Final Paper Table of Contents List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………....1 List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………….3
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Dunes
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF THE DEL MONTE FOREST COASTAL DUNES DEL MONTE FOREST PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared for: Pebble Beach Company Post Office Box 1767 Pebble Beach, California 93953-1767 Contact: Mark Stilwell (831) 625-8497 Prepared by: Zander Associates 150 Ford Way, Suite 101 Novato, California 94945 Contact: Michael Zander July 2001 Zander Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Plates 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................1 2.0 Overview of Dunes within the DMF Planning Area...................................................2 2.1 Remnant Dunes .......................................................................................................2 2.2 Rehabilitation Area..................................................................................................4 2.3 ESHA Boundary......................................................................................................6 3.0 Relationship to the DMF Plan .....................................................................................8 3.1 Preserve Areas (Area L and Signal Hill Dune) .......................................................8 3.2 Development Areas (New Golf Course and Facilities—Areas M & N).................8 3.2.1 General Design Considerations .......................................................................8 3.2.2 Golf Course Specific Design...........................................................................9 3.2.3 Golf
    [Show full text]
  • Here's Why Pebble Beach Resorts Is So Much More Than Golf
    Your legendary meeting. Our legendary setting. HERE’S WHY PEBBLE BEACH RESORTS IS SO MUCH MORE THAN GOLF © 2015 Pebble Beach Company. © 2015 Pebble PEBBLE BEACH Your legendary meeting. Our legendary setting. HERE’S WHY PEBBLE BEACH RESORTS IS SO MUCH MORE THAN GOLF By: Creighton Casper, Master Connection Associates & Tim Ryan, Pebble Beach Company TABLE OF CONTENTS America’s Course 3 The Allure of Pebble Beach 3 Corporate Meeting Destination 4 Marketing Paradox 4 Incomparable Location 5 Road Trip–Pacific Coast Highway 5 On Pebble Beach 6-10 The Pebble Beach Advantage 11 Productive Partnership 12 Pebble Beach Meetings • (800) 877-8991 • www.PebbleBeachMeetings.com • Page 2 AMERICA’S COURSE Since Pebble Beach Golf Links opened in 1919, Pebble Beach Resorts has become an international icon in the world of championship golf and a bucket list destination for serious golfers everywhere. Set along the rugged Pacific Coast of the Monterey Peninsula, the golf courses at Pebble Beach occupy some of the most beautiful and scenic spaces in California. For nearly 100 years, Pebble Beach has hosted the greats of the game and built an unequaled position in the storied history of golf. Famed Pebble Beach Golf Links has been called “The St. Andrews of the United States” and “America’s Course”. Each year, golfers from around the world make their way to the Monterey Peninsula to test their game on the fabled fairways and greens of the resort’s four championship courses. For many, this trip realizes the dream of a lifetime. Playing the storied tracks at Pebble Beach is a defining moment for golfers of all stripes and a cherished memory for those fortunate enough to experience it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quarterdeck / 1993-05-13
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Institutional Publications The Quarterdeck (publication) 1993-05-13 The Quarterdeck / 1993-05-13 Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey Callifornia http://hdl.handle.net/10945/52064 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL• Monterey, California ARMED ~ORCES DAY 'SATURDAY; MAY 15 IN THIS ISSUE: .. • ·-· ~ Employee awards ' :·: * ·MOARS course · !!~llii!!lll~11!J!!i!lii!l!:i!iii!if~!:!!i~!!i~lfl!!illl NAVY FLYING CLUB $18. Planes are checked out only to members who have a valid pilot' s license HOSTS 'OPEN HOUSE' and rental fees are charged for the planes. The new address for the club is 806 The Monterey Navy Hying Qub duty and retired military, DOD employ­ Airport Road. There is a secured access hosts an ''Open House" tomorrow, from ees and dependents. The members pay an gate into the airport. For more details and 1:30 - 4 p.m., at the Monterey Peninsula initiation fee of $30 and monthly dues of call 372-7033. Airport to conunemorate the opening of its newly constructed hangar. The club recently relocated to the :M©NTEREY>YMCA HONORs ·: sERVIGES north-east side of the airport and its new $55,000 facility. The new hangar, paid auR1NG ARMEo .. FoRces·wEEKf ·· MA v~ -1 :=g ··::: for by the flying club, provides more ·. Th~ YrttCA of' the M~n~~y Peninsula ~s~orting th/ liandicapped ai the room than the old facilities. Fuel costs honoftd five area service members dur- _,. Monterey County Fairgrounds; working will drop with the opening of the new irig their Military Appredatlon Awai-els > fo~ S«uriiJ and iDrormation ~nee hangar.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of an Isolated Anchor in Monterey, California Is Puzzling Because It Is Made Entirely of Bronze
    THE MYSTERY OF BRONZE ANCHORS: THE MONTEREY BRONZE ANCHOR AS A CASE STUDY JEFFREY R. DELSESCAUX CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA The discovery of an isolated anchor in Monterey, California is puzzling because it is made entirely of bronze. Throughout history, iron and stone have been the typical material used in the manufacturing of ship anchors. The anchor was discovered in Monterey Bay, California in 1944 after becoming fouled in the anchor line of an oil tanker. Now permanently displayed outside the historic Customs House in Monterey State Historic Park, this bronze anchor continues to puzzle researchers. This paper will discuss the possible sources of the Monterey bronze anchor and hypothesize on geographical pressures and lack of industrial resources that could have produced a need for bronze anchors. Iron anchors are a common artifact type displayed in the various seaports around the world. They are so common that most people give them little attention. These anchors usually lack provenience and are in poor condition from their exposure to salt water and, having never been conserved after being recovered, they are deteriorating. It is disappointing because although they lack provenience, anchors can still provide useful data. Typology can provided details, such as age and nationality, and provide clues into the past trading patterns of seaports. The study of anchors might be neglected, but there is one anchor that deserves closer inspection. At Monterey State Historic Park (SHP) in Monterey, California, an unusual bronze anchor lies outside the Customs House, a historic structure that dates back to 1827 (Figure 1). A plaque placed next to it reads, "Old bronze anchor brought up from the bottom of Monterey Bay in July 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.06 AT&T Pebble Beach
    Tournament Fact Sheet AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am Pebble Beach Golf Links • Pebble Beach, Calif. • Feb. 6-9, 2020 Director of Golf Course Maintenance Tournament Set-up Chris Dalhamer, CGCS Par: 72 Phone: 831-622-6601 Yardage: 6,816 Email: [email protected] Stimpmeter: 10.5 Years as GCSAA Member: 20 Course Statistics Years at Pebble Beach: 9 Average Green Size: 3,500 sq. ft. Average Tee Size: 3,500 sq. ft. Previous Courses: Spyglass (super), Carmel Valley Ranch Acres of Fairway: 30 (dir. of maint.), Pebble Beach (assistant) Acres of Rough: 80 Hometown: Pacific Grove, Calif. Number of Sand Bunkers: 118 Education: CS-Chico and Monterey Peninsula College Number of Water Hazards: Pacific Ocean Soil Conditions: Sandy loam Number of Employees: 30 Water Sources: Effluent water Number of Tournament Volunteers: 15-20 Drainage Conditions: Fair Other Key Golf Personnel Turfgrass Eric McAlister, Assistant Superintendent Greens: Poa annua .125” Bubba Wright, Assistant Superintendent Tees: Ryegrass .400” Mark Thomas, Irrigation Technician Fairways: Poa annua .450” Charlie Almony, Field Supervisor Rough: Ryegrass 2” Jon Rybicki, Equipment Manager John Swain, Club president/manager Additional Notes Eric Lippert, PGA Professional • There was 10 inches of rainfall from Nov. John Sawin, director of Golf 25-Dec. 31 and has made the course wetter than normal. Course Architect • An improved short course designed by Architect (year): Jack Nevill and Douglas Grant (1919) Tiger Woods will open this year. Course Owner: Lone Cypress Group Rounds Per Year: 60,000 • Species of trees on course include Monterey pines, coastal live oaks and Monterey cypress Tournament Fact Sheets for the PGA, LPGA, Champions and Korn Ferry Tours can be found all year at: • Pebble Beach is Audubon certified.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Services, Prices, and Specialization Monterey Peninsula Water Management District Stephanie Locke July 9Th, 2020
    EXHIBIT 2-C Overview of Services, Prices, and Specialization Monterey Peninsula Water Management District Stephanie Locke July 9th, 2020 1 EXHIBIT 2-C : : Monterey Peninsula Water Management District Overview for: Stephanie Locke Our team of strategists, graphic designers, content developers, web developers, and multimedia producers, work synergistically with clients to create organic messages, stories, and themes that resonate with audiences for many years. At TMD Creative, we have been partnering with public and governmental agencies and marketing to the varied audiences throughout Monterey County, since our founding over 20 years ago. We currently work with the Monterey County Department of Health Clinic Services, Monterey County Department of Behavioral Health, and the Monterey County Department of Social Services. Additionally, we started working hand-in-hand with county leaders and the Board of Supervisors on the county wide coronavirus response. TMD Creative has been in business since 1999. Our core competencies include messaging and strategic implementation, audience segmentation, public relations, copywriting, graphic design—including infographics, video production, collateral material creation, as well as design and programming of websites, and collaborating with clients to best execute their vision, while keeping varied stakeholders at top of mind. We have a strong history of delivering projects on-time and on-budget. TMD’s specialization is in developing strategic marketing initiatives and implementing them with our award-winning, in-house team. We do not outsource any strategic, design, or production work. We have a diverse staff, a number of whom are native Spanish speakers. TMD has experience marketing to all the varied constituencies in Monterey County and understand the vehicles needed to reach these different audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 4-2019 Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California" (2019). Botanical Studies. 41. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/41 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE COASTAL DUNES OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California Ninth Edition • August 2019 Amaryllidaceae — Onion or Amaryllis Family F E R N S Allium unifolium •One-leaved onion Dennstaedtiaceae — Bracken Fern Family Anacardiaceae — Cashew Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens • Bracken fern Toxicodendron diversilobum • Poison-oak Ophioglossaceae — Adder’s-tongue Family Apocynaceae — Dogbane or Milkweed Family Botrychium multifidum • Leathery
    [Show full text]
  • Cityfocus-Winter2019
    City Focus Winter 2019 volume XXXIV, no. 1 A RepMoret fsrosma gthee Cfirtyo omf M tohnteer Ceyi ttoy it sM Ciatinzeangs aenrd -F r iends M eet -up w it h Neig hb orhood Presid ent s After a few year hiatus, Mayor Roberson and I reintroduced meet-ups with Neighborhood Association Presidents. The first get-together was held Wednesday, January 30 in the Council Chamber. It provided a great opportunity for us to introduce our new Finance Director, Lauren Lai, and new Parks and Recreation Director, Kristi McClure-Huckaby. Assistant Police Chief Bill Clark was also in attendance to answer safety and crime related questions. The evening was very productive, with all but one neighborhood represented. We talked about priorities, challenges, and interests. We listened to concerns, perspectives, and expectations. The biggest priority for the City is the budget, because everything else that happens rests on being fiscally solvent. Other big topic items that are a priority for the City include: adopting a new wireless ordinance, obtaining the Old Capital site, and resolving homeless issues, especially at Laguna Grande Park. Broad topics of concerns and interests expressed were undergrounding utilities, maintaining our quality of life and making sure we don't overdevelop the waterfront, public safety, housing and homelessness, jobs, water, continuing the infrastructure improvements through Measure S, catching up with the backlog of Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP) projects, and the congestion and gridlock caused during Car Week each August. At the end of the evening, I think each person there learned something. We appreciate the commitment by the Neighborhood Presidents, and we assured them that we are working to do the best job we can for the community and to maintain our high quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to SRSB Dune Restoration and Management Plan
    The Greater Salinas River State Beach Dune Restoration and Management Plan Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs and Coastal Conservation and Research in partnership with California Department of Parks and Recreation Revised June 2020 This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Existing Conditions and Background ....................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Site Description ............................................................................................................ 1 Plants and Animals at the Dunes ........................................................................................ 5 Dunes and Iceplant ....................................................................................................... 10 Previous Restoration Efforts in Monterey Bay ...................................................................... 12 Dunes as Coastal Protection from Storms ........................................................................... 14 Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................. 16 Summary................................................................................................................... 16 Restoration Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................... 18 Goal 1. Eradicate
    [Show full text]