DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OPTIMIZING THE NATION’S INVESTMENT IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH INVESTMENT IN ACADEMIC OPTIMIZING THE NATION’S OPTIMIZING THE NATION’S INVESTMENT IN ACADEMIC RESEARCH A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century Committee on Federal Research Regulations and Reporting Requirements: A New Framework for Research Universities in the 21st Century Committee on Science, Technology, and Law Board on Higher Education and Workforce Policy and Global Affairs THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This activity was supported at least in part with federal funds from the U.S. Department of Education under Contract No. ED-OPE-14-C-0116 and under Contract No. HHSN26300067 with the National Institutes of Health of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations ex- pressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project, nor does mention of trade names, commer- cial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-37948-9 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-37948-2 Digital Object Identifier: 10.17226/21824 Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334- 3313; http://www.nap.edu. Copyright 2016 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Optimizing the Nation’s Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21824. The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the na- tion on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the na- tion. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was estab- lished in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished con- tributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineer- ing, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy deci- sions. The Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding con- tributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engi- neering, and medicine. Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.national-academies.org. COMMITTEE ON FEDERAL RESEARCH REGULATIONS AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES IN THE 21ST CENTURY Chair LARRY R. FAULKNER, President Emeritus, The University of Texas at Austin Vice Chair HARRIET RABB, Vice President and General Counsel, The Rockefeller University Members ILESANMI ADESIDA (NAE), Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and Provost, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ANN ARVIN (NAM), Lucile Salter Packard Professor of Pediatrics and Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Vice Provost and Dean of Research, Stanford University BARBARA E. BIERER, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Faculty Co-chair, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center, Harvard University (Harvard MRCT) JONATHAN D. BREUL, Adjunct Professor, McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University CLAUDE R. CANIZARES (NAS), Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ARTURO CASADEVALL (NAM), Professor and Chair, W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health JONATHAN R. COLE, John Mitchell Mason Professor of the University and Provost and Dean of Faculties (1989–2003), Columbia University LEE ELLIS, Professor of Surgical Oncology and Molecular and Cellular Oncology and the William C. Liedtke, Jr. Chair in Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center GEOFFREY E. GRANT, President, Research Advocates JOSEPH R. HAYWOOD, Assistant Vice President for Regulatory Affairs and Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University STEVEN JOFFE, Emanuel and Robert Hart Associate Professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine DAVID KORN (NAM), Professor of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School CHARLES F. LOUIS, Professor of Cell Biology and Neuroscience Emeritus and former Vice Chancellor for Research, University of California, Riverside v DAVID W. ROBINSON, Professor and Executive Vice Provost, Oregon Health and Science University THOMAS J. ROSOL, Professor, Veterinary Biosciences; Senior Advisor, Life Sciences, University Office of Technology Commercialization and Knowledge Transfer; and Special Assistant to the Vice President for Research, The Ohio State University STUART SHAPIRO, Associate Professor and Director, Public Policy Program, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University Staff ANNE-MARIE MAZZA, Study Director and Senior Director, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law THOMAS RUDIN, Director, Board on Higher Education and Workforce ELIZABETH O’HARE, Program Officer, Board on Higher Education and Workforce (until January 2016) STEVEN KENDALL, Program Officer, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law NINA BOSTON, Senior Project Assistant, Board on Higher Education and Workforce (until September 2015) KAROLINA KONARZEWSKA, Program Coordinator, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law vi COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND LAW Co-Chairs DAVID BALTIMORE (NAS/NAM), President Emeritus and Robert Andrews Millikan Professor of Biology, California Institute of Technology DAVID S. TATEL, Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Members THOMAS D. ALBRIGHT (NAS), Professor and Director, Vision Center Laboratory and Conrad T. Prebys Chair in Vision Research, Salk Institute for Biological Studies ANN ARVIN (NAM), Lucile Salter Packard Professor of Pediatrics and Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Vice Provost and Dean of Research, Stanford University BARBARA E. BIERER, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Faculty Co-chair, Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center, Harvard University (Harvard MRCT) CLAUDE R. CANIZARES (NAS), Bruno Rossi Professor of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ARTURO CASADEVALL (NAM), Professor and Chair, W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health JOE S. CECIL, Project Director, Program on Scientific and Technical Evidence, Division of Research, Federal Judicial Center R. ALTA CHARO (NAM), Warren P. Knowles Professor of Law and Bioethics, University of Wisconsin at Madison HARRY T. EDWARDS, Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit DREW ENDY, Associate Professor, Bioengineering, Stanford University and President, The BioBricks Foundation MARCUS FELDMAN (NAS), Burnet C. and Mildred Wohlford Professor of Biological Sciences, Stanford University JEREMY FOGEL, Director, The Federal Judicial Center HENRY T. GREELY, Deane F. and Kate Edelman Johnson Professor of Law and Professor, by courtesy, of Genetics, Stanford University MICHAEL GREENBERGER, Law School Professor and Director, Center for Health and Homeland Security, University of Maryland MICHAEL IMPERIALE, Arthur F. Thurnau Professor of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan GREG KISOR, Chief Technologist, Intellectual Ventures vii ROBERT S. LANGER (NAS/NAE/NAM), David H. Koch Institute Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology GOODWIN LIU, Associate Justice, California Supreme Court JENNIFER MNOOKIN, Dean and David G. Price and Dallas P. Price Professor of Law, University of California, Los Angeles School of Law R. GREGORY MORGAN, Senior Vice President and Secretary of the Corporation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology HARRIET RABB, Vice President and General Counsel, The Rockefeller University DAVID RELMAN (NAM), Thomas C. and Joan M. Merigan Professor, Departments of Medicine and of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University and Chief, Infectious Disease Section, VA Palo Alto Health Care System MARTINE A. ROTHBLATT, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, United Therapeutics DAVID VLADECK, Professor and Co-Director, Institute for Public Representation, Georgetown Law School Staff ANNE-MARIE MAZZA, Senior Director STEVEN KENDALL, Program Officer KAROLINA KONARZEWSKA, Program Coordinator viii BOARD ON HIGHER EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE Chair WILLIAM
Recommended publications
  • 2015 Annual Report

    2015 Annual Report

    2015 AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY ANNUAL TM ADVANCING PHYSICS REPORT TM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY STRIVES TO Be the leading voice for physics and an authoritative source of physics information for the advancement of physics and the benefit of humanity Collaborate with national scientific societies for the advancement of science, science education, and the science community Cooperate with international physics societies to promote physics, to support physicists worldwide, and to foster international collaboration Have an active, engaged, and diverse membership, and support the activities of its units and members © 2016 American Physical Society During 2015, APS worked to institute the governance objective: “the advancement and diffusion of the knowledge changes approved by the membership in late 2014. In of physics.” APS is fully committed to the principles of OA accordance with the new Constitution & Bylaws, in to the extent that we can continue to support the production February the Board appointed our first Chief Executive of high-quality peer-reviewed journals. For many years APS Officer—Kate Kirby, the former Executive Officer—to has supported “green” OA and we have been fully compliant head the APS. Kate’s major task has been to transition with the 2013 directive from the Office of Science and the management of APS to a CEO model with a Senior Technology Policy that the publications resulting from Management Team. She appointed Mark Doyle as Chief U.S. federally funded research be accessible to the public 12 Information Officer, James Taylor as Chief Operating months after publication. Since APS is a major international Officer, and Matthew Salter as the new Publisher.
  • 2018 March Meeting Program Guide

    2018 March Meeting Program Guide

    MARCHMEETING2018 LOS ANGELES MARCH 5-9 PROGRAM GUIDE #apsmarch aps.org/meetingapp aps.org/meetings/march Senior Editor: Arup Chakraborty Robert T. Haslam Professor of Chemical Engineering; Professor of Chemistry, Physics, and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT Now welcoming submissions in the Physics of Living Systems Submit your best work at elifesci.org/physics-living-systems Image: D. Bonazzi (CC BY 2.0) Led by Senior Editor Arup Chakraborty, this dedicated new section of the open-access journal eLife welcomes studies in which experimental, theoretical, and computational approaches rooted in the physical sciences are developed and/or applied to provide deep insights into the collective properties and function of multicomponent biological systems and processes. eLife publishes groundbreaking research in the life and biomedical sciences. All decisions are made by working scientists. WELCOME t is a pleasure to welcome you to Los Angeles and to the APS March I Meeting 2018. As has become a tradition, the March Meeting is a spectacular gathering of an enthusiastic group of scientists from diverse organizations and backgrounds who have broad interests in physics. This meeting provides us an opportunity to present exciting new work as well as to learn from others, and to meet up with colleagues and make new friends. While you are here, I encourage you to take every opportunity to experience the amazing science that envelops us at the meeting, and to enjoy the many additional professional and social gatherings offered. Additionally, this is a year for Strategic Planning for APS, when the membership will consider the evolving mission of APS and where we want to go as a society.
  • July 2007 (Volume 16, Number 7) Entire Issue

    July 2007 (Volume 16, Number 7) Entire Issue

    July 2007 Volume 16, No. 7 www.aps.org/publications/apsnews APS NEWS Election Preview A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY • WWW.apS.ORG/PUBLICATIONS/apSNEWS Pages 6-7 Executive Board Resolution Thanks US physics team trains for competition in Iran By Katherine McAlpine Legislators for Support of Science Twenty-four high school stu- The APS Executive Board bill authorizes nearly $60 billion dents comprising the US Phys- has passed a resolution thanking for various programs for FY 2008 ics Olympiad team vied for five House and Senate policy makers through FY 2011. The bill would places on the traveling team at for recently-passed legislation double the NSF budget over five the University of Maryland from that strengthens the science, math years and double the DOE Office May 22nd to June 1st. Those and engineering activities of our of Science budget over 10 years. chosen to travel will compete nation. The House of Representatives this month against teams from “Sustaining and improving the passed five separate authorization all over the world at Isfahan standard of living of American bills, which were then combined University of Technology in Is- citizens, achieving energy security into one bill, H.R. 2272, the 21st fahan, Iran. and environmental sustainability, Century Competitiveness Act of Over 3,100 US Physics Team providing the jobs of tomorrow 2007. The bill would put the NSF hopefuls took the preliminary and defending our nation against budget and the NIST Scientific examination in January, and 200 aggressors all require federal in- and Technical Research and Ser- were given a second exam in vestments in science education vices budget on track to double in March to determine the top 24 and research… The Board con- 10 years.
  • Protecting the Rights of Patients, Nurses, and Others Participating in Research

    Protecting the Rights of Patients, Nurses, and Others Participating in Research

    1.5 ANCC CONTACT HOURS Protecting the rights of patients, nurses, and others participating in research BY JOANN MICK, PhD, RN, NEA-BC Abstract: Clinical nurses are in a unique CLINICAL NURSES are in a unique position to support research that studies position to support research on the the effects of interventions, symptom effects of nursing interventions, management, education, and treatment plan symptom management, education, adherence in their patients. Nurses may also and treatment plan adherence in participate in research studies that aim to their patients. Nurses may also par- advance professional nursing practice. Using ticipate in research studies that aim a quiz format, this article addresses clinical nurses’ role in research, the history of federal to advance professional nursing regulation of research, basic human rights practice. and potential violations during the conduct A fundamental principle of nurs- of research, and specific nursing actions ing practice is respect for the inher- required when research is conducted in the ent dignity, worth, unique attributes, practice setting. and human rights of all individuals.1 Nurses who understand legal and Keywords: Belmont Report, Common Rule, ethical protections for human sub- Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical jects can contribute to research by Practice guidelines, human rights, human serving as advocates for their patients subjects protection, Kefauver-Harris and helping to ensure that studies Amendments, Nuremberg Code, thalidomide, Tuskegee study, Willowbrook are conducted in an ethical, legal, State School study and scientifically valid manner. ISTOCK Test your knowledge of the clini- / cal nurse’s role in research by taking ASISEEIT 26 l Nursing2019 l Volume 49, Number 7 www.Nursing2019.com Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
  • Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting of the APS Forum on the History of Physics, Sunday, April 13, 2008, 1:00 PM – 5:20 PM, Directors Row 23, Hyatt Regency St

    Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting of the APS Forum on the History of Physics, Sunday, April 13, 2008, 1:00 PM – 5:20 PM, Directors Row 23, Hyatt Regency St

    Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting of the APS Forum on the History of Physics, Sunday, April 13, 2008, 1:00 PM – 5:20 PM, Directors Row 23, Hyatt Regency St. Louis Riverfront Hotel in St. Louis, Missouri. (The minutes of the annual Business Meeting of the FHP is at the end of this report.) Present: William E. Evenson (Chair), David C. Cassidy (Chair-Elect), Virginia Trimble (Past-Chair), Roger H. Stuewer (APS Councillor), Michael Riordan (Newsletter Editor), and Members-at-Large J. David Jackson, Paul Halpern, Peter Pesic, George O. Zimmerman. Newly-elected participants, with terms beginning at the close of the April meeting: Robert G. Arns, Daniel Kleppner. Visitors (for various times throughout the meeting): Alan Chodos, Amy Flatten, Judy Franz, Clayton Gearhart, Don Howard, Ed Neuenschwander, John S. Rigden, Joe Serene, Gene Sprouse. Gloria B. Lubkin (Vice-Chair) joined the meeting on speakerphone. Thomas Miller (Secretary-Treasurer) was unable to attend; Paul Halpern recorded the minutes for the meeting. 1. Opening: Following lunch, Bill Evenson opened the meeting at 1:20 PM, welcomed participants and made introductions. 2. Presentations by APS Visitors: Gene Sprouse, APS Editor-in-Chief, reported that APS journals continue to grow. He mentioned several new features including “Editor’s Suggestions” (2 or 3 papers chosen each week for special interest), “Milestone Letters” (especially significant papers from each year of Physical Review Letters dating back to 1958), a project to show the names of Asian authors in their own language characters along with the English transliteration, a project to recognize outstanding referees, and a new online service called “Physical Review Select,” in which experts write introductory pieces about articles.
  • Table of Contents Preface

    Table of Contents Preface

    NPR 7100.1B -- TOC Page 1 of 12 | NODIS Library | Program Formulation(7000s) | Search | NASA NPR 7100.1B Effective Date: February 15, Procedural 2019 Expiration Date: February 15, Requirements 2024 COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY FOR NASA EMPLOYEES Protection of Human Research Subjects Responsible Office: Office of the Chief Health & Medical Officer SPECIAL ATTENTION: ONLY USE NID 7100.133, Protection of Human Research Subjects. Table of Contents Preface P.1 Purpose P.2 Applicability P.3 Authority P.4 Applicable Documents and Forms P.5 Measurement/Verification P.6 Cancellation Chapter 1. Introduction 1.1 Human Subject Research at NASA 1.2 Common Rule Implementation Chapter 2. Criteria for NASA Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval 2.1 Criteria for all Research 2.2 Additional Criteria for Human Research Genetic Testing Chapter 3. NASA Specific Requirements 3.1 Research Modifications This document does not bind the public, except as authorized by law or as NPR 7100.1B -- TOC incorporated into a contract. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Check Page 1 of 12 the NASA Online Directives Information System (NODIS) Library to verify that this is the correct version before use: https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov. NPR 7100.1B -- TOC Page 2 of 12 3.1 Research Modifications 3.2 Medical Data 3.3 Withdrawal from Research 3.4 Adverse Events 3.5 Sanctions and Disciplinary Action Appendix A. Definitions Appendix B. Acronyms Appendix C. References This document does not bind the public, except as authorized by law or as NPR 7100.1B -- TOC incorporated into a contract. This document is uncontrolled when printed.
  • Protecting Human Research Participants NIH Office of Extramural Research Introduction

    Protecting Human Research Participants NIH Office of Extramural Research Introduction

    Protecting Human Research Participants NIH Office of Extramural Research Introduction Research with human subjects can occasionally result in a dilemma for investigators. When the goals of the research are designed to make major contributions to a field, such as improving the understanding of a disease process or determining the efficacy of an intervention, investigators may perceive the outcomes of their studies to be more important than providing protections for individual participants in the research. Although it is understandable to focus on goals, our society values the rights and welfare of individuals. It is not considered ethical behavior to use individuals solely as means to an end. The importance of demonstrating respect for research participants is reflected in the principles used to define ethical research and the regulations, policies, and guidance that describe the implementation of those principles. Who? This course is intended for use by individuals involved in the design and/or conduct of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded human subjects research. What? This course is designed to prepare investigators involved in the design and/or conduct of research involving human subjects to understand their obligations to protect the rights and welfare of subjects in research. The course material presents basic concepts, principles, and issues related to the protection of research participants. Why? As a part of NIH's commitment to the protection of human subjects and its response to Federal mandates for increased emphasis on protection for human subjects in research, the NIH Office of Extramural Research released a policy on Required Education in the Protection of Human Research Participants in June 2000.
  • 2018 Common Rule Frequently Asked Questions (Faqs)

    2018 Common Rule Frequently Asked Questions (Faqs)

    Institutional Review Board Human Research Protections 2018 Common Rule Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Version January 25, 2019 General Questions Relating to the Common Rule 1. WHAT IS THE COMMON RULE? The current U.S. system of protection for human research subjects is heavily influenced by the Belmont Report, written in 1979 by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report outlines the basic ethical principles in research involving human subjects. In 1981, with this report as foundational background, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised, and made as compatible as possible under their respective statutory authorities, their existing human subjects regulations. The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or the “Common Rule” was published in 1991 and codified in separate regulations by 15 Federal departments and agencies. The HHS regulations, 45 CFR part 46, include four subparts: subpart A, also known as the Federal Policy or the “Common Rule”; subpart B, additional protections for pregnant women, human fetuses, and neonates; subpart C, additional protections for prisoners; and subpart D, additional protections for children. Each agency includes in its chapter of the Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] section numbers and language that are identical to those of the HHS codification at 45 CFR part 46, subpart A. For all participating departments and agencies the Common Rule outlines the basic provisions for IRBs, informed consent, and Assurances of Compliance. Human subject research conducted or supported by each federal department/agency is governed by the regulations of that department/agency.
  • Guidelines for Human Biospecimens Storage and Tracking 12913

    Guidelines for Human Biospecimens Storage and Tracking 12913

    Guidelines for Human Biospecimen Storage, This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under Tracking, CC BY-ND Sharing, and Disposal within the NIH Intramural Research Program September, 2019; Revised May, 2021; Revised September, 2021 1 Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4 Definition of Human Biospecimens ............................................................................................. 4 1. Legal and ethical considerations ............................................................................................. 6 2. Collection and storage ............................................................................................................ 7 3. Inventory database systems and tracking ................................................................................ 9 4. Quality management practices including standard operating procedures .............................. 10 5. Custodianship ....................................................................................................................... 10 6. Disposal, sharing, or release of NIH biospecimens .............................................................. 11 7. Shipping ..............................................................................................................................
  • INSIDE STANFORD MEDICINE Th Participant Inthe Participant November 6, 2017 6, November Disorders

    INSIDE STANFORD MEDICINE Th Participant Inthe Participant November 6, 2017 6, November Disorders

    Clinical trial participants with Alzheimer’s disease who received blood STANFORD plasma from young donors showed some evidence of INSIDE improvement. Volume 9, No. 20MEDICINE November 6, 2017 Published by the Office of Communication & Public Affairs Page 4 Novel biomedical study seeks participants By Krista Conger STEVE FISCH eslie Purchase describes herself as kind of a data devotee. So last Lspring, when she heard about the Project Baseline study — one of the largest, most comprehensive efforts to understand the basic underpinnings of health and disease — she jumped at the chance to participate. “I’m so excited to be part of this effort to understand more about what makes the human body work,” said Purchase, 41, a former physician and mother of three who volunteers with the non- profit Rotaplast International. “It’s an opportunity to help inform health and wellness on a scale that’s never before been attempted, and I think it’s a pretty easy way to do something good for the world.” The study is an ambitious endeavor, with a potentially transformative payoff. Launched in April after years of design- ing and planning by Verily, an Alphabet company, in partnership with Stanford Medicine and the Duke University School of Medicine, it aims to under- stand the molecular basis of health by repeatedly collecting vast amounts of biomedical data from as many as 10,000 participants over the course of at least Leslie Purchase of Mill Valley was among the first to enroll in Stanford’s portion of Project Baseline. The watch on her wrist helps keep track of her activity.
  • 2001 Annual Report

    2001 Annual Report

    Cover and inside photos courtesy of the following: V.K. Vlasko-Vlasov, U. Welp (Argonne National Laboratory) and V. Metlushko (University of Illinois at Chicago); CERN; I.S. Aranson et al, Physical Review Letters 84, 3306 (2000); CDMS; RHIC and Brookhaven National Laboratory; Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 088302 (2001); A. Zehl, M. Yoshida, and D.T. Colbert; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; MIT; NASA Glenn Reseach Center. At the start of the year, the Executive Branch of the federal government was in the midst of transition. However, while the government almost appeared to slow to a halt during the transition, news of exciting physics research results continued unabated. During the APS March Meeting in Seattle, a marathon session was held on the new superconductor, magnesium diboride, while at the April Meeting in Washington, DC, excitement was high as the first reports of new precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background strongly supported the idea of an early inflationary universe. Other lead stories included the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) results confirming solar neutrino oscillations, the establishment of CP violation in B-meson decay, and the demonstration of bringing pulses of light to a standstill in such a way that all of the information that they contain is stored in atomic excitations and later recoverable. Heroic efforts by the APS Editorial Office staff throughout the year allowed the completion of the Physical Review On-line Archive, PROLA, so that every paper that APS has ever published is now on-line and readily accessible. Within PROLA, each paper is linked to previous papers to which it refers and also to subsequent papers that cite it.
  • Center for History of Physics Newsletter, Spring 2008

    Center for History of Physics Newsletter, Spring 2008

    One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3843, CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Tel. 301-209-3165 Vol. XL, Number 1 Spring 2008 AAS Working Group Acts to Preserve Astronomical Heritage By Stephen McCluskey mong the physical sciences, astronomy has a long tradition A of constructing centers of teaching and research–in a word, observatories. The heritage of these centers survives in their physical structures and instruments; in the scientific data recorded in their observing logs, photographic plates, and instrumental records of various kinds; and more commonly in the published and unpublished records of astronomers and of the observatories at which they worked. These records have continuing value for both historical and scientific research. In January 2007 the American Astronomical Society (AAS) formed a working group to develop and disseminate procedures, criteria, and priorities for identifying, designating, and preserving structures, instruments, and records so that they will continue to be available for astronomical and historical research, for the teaching of astronomy, and for outreach to the general public. The scope of this charge is quite broad, encompassing astronomical structures ranging from archaeoastronomical sites to modern observatories; papers of individual astronomers, observatories and professional journals; observing records; and astronomical instruments themselves. Reflecting this wide scope, the members of the working group include historians of astronomy, practicing astronomers and observatory directors, and specialists Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Santa encounters tight security during in astronomical instruments, archives, and archaeology. a wartime visit to Oak Ridge. Many more images recently donated by the Digital Photo Archive, Department of Energy appear on page 13 and The first item on the working group’s agenda was to determine through out this newsletter.