Relationships of Surrogate Indexes of Insulin Resistance with Insulin Sensitivity Assessed by Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clamp and Subclinical Vascular Damage
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Metabolism Open access Original research BMJ Open Diab Res Care: first published as 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000911 on 13 November 2019. Downloaded from Relationships of surrogate indexes of insulin resistance with insulin sensitivity assessed by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and subclinical vascular damage Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino ,1 Maria Adelaide Marini,2 Elena Succurro,1 Francesco Andreozzi,1 Giorgio Sesti3 To cite: Fiorentino TV, ABSTRACT Marini MA, Succurro E, et al. Introduction Insulin resistance plays a crucial role in Significance of this study Relationships of surrogate the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular indexes of insulin resistance disease. The triglyceride to high- density lipoprotein What is already known about this subject? with insulin sensitivity cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio, visceral adiposity index ► The triglyceride to high- density lipoprotein choles- assessed by euglycemic terol (TG/HDL- C) ratio, visceral adiposity index (VAI), hyperinsulinemic clamp and (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP) and triglycerides × fasting glucose (TyG) index are surrogate measures lipid accumulation product (LAP) and triglycerides × subclinical vascular damage. fasting glucose (TyG) index have been developed as of insulin sensitivity based on anthropometric and/or BMJ Open Diab Res Care surrogate measures of insulin resistance based on 2019;7:e000911. doi:10.1136/ biochemical parameters routinely collected in clinical bmjdrc-2019-000911 practice. Herein, we compared the relationships of these anthropometric and/or biochemical parameters rou- four surrogate indexes with insulin sensitivity assessed tinely collected in clinical practice. by the gold standard euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp What are the new findings? ► Additional material is technique, and subclinical vascular damage. ► Among the four surrogate indexes of insulin resis- copyright. published online only. To view Research design and methods 631 subjects with please visit the journal online tance, LAP index correlates better with insulin sen- different degrees of glucose tolerance underwent (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ sitivity assessed by the gold standard euglycemic euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. The surrogate TG/ bmjdrc- 2019- 000911). hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. HDL-C ratio, VAI, LAP and TyG indexes were computed. ► LAP index was the only surrogate index showing Pulse pressure and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) significant association with the insulin sensitivity in Received 14 September 2019 were measured as indicators of subclinical vascular individuals with impaired glucose tolerance or type Revised 8 October 2019 damage. 2 diabetes. Accepted 16 October 2019 Results All the four surrogate indexes showed a The ability of LAP index to identify subjects with in- significant correlation with insulin- stimulated glucose ► sulin resistance is higher than TG/HDL- C ratio, VAI disposal in the whole study population. However, only and TyG indexes. LAP index had a significant association with insulin sensitivity across the different glucose tolerance ► All the four indexes have a similar ability to de- http://drc.bmj.com/ groups. LAP index showed the highest area under tect individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis. the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.728) Conversely, LAP index had the greatest ability to rec- to detect individuals with insulin resistance defined ognize individuals with increased vascular stiffness. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re- use as the bottom quartile of insulin- stimulated glucose How might these results change the focus of permitted under CC BY-NC. No disposal, followed by TG/HDL- C ratio (0.693), TyG index research or clinical practice? commercial re- (0.688) and VAI (0.688). A significant association was use. See rights ► Among the four surrogate measures of insulin re- on September 25, 2021 by guest. Protected and permissions. Published found between the four indexes of insulin sensitivity sistance based on anthropometric and biochemical by BMJ. and pulse pressure and IMT. All the four indexes have parameters, LAP index is the best discriminator of 1 a similar ability to detect individuals with vascular Department of Medical and insulin resistance and subclinical vascular damage. Surgical Sciences, Magna atherosclerosis defined by IMT>0.9 mm. Conversely, Assessment of LAP index in clinical practice should Graecia University of Catanzaro, LAP index had the greatest ability to recognize ► be preferred to TG/HDL- C ratio, VAI and TyG indexes Catanzaro, Italy individuals with increased vascular stiffness defined by 2 for a better cardiometabolic risk stratification. Department of Systems pulse pressure ≥60 mm Hg. Medicine, University of Rome Conclusion Among the surrogate TG/HDL-C ratio, VAI, LAP Tor Vergata, Roma, Lazio, Italy and TyG indexes of insulin sensitivity, LAP index showed 3Department of Clinical and a significant association with insulin-stimula ted glucose Molecular Medicine, University INTRODUCTION disposal across the different glucose tolerance categories of Rome La Sapienza, Roma, Insulin resistance is a characteristic trait of both Lazio, Italy and the highest ability to detect insulin resistance and 1–3 4–6 subclinical vascular damage. pre- diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Correspondence to Insulin resistance is considered central to the 7 8 Dr Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes, and vanessa. fiorentino@ unicz. it predicts the development of cardiovascular BMJ Open Diab Res Care 2019;7:e000911. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000911 1 Metabolism BMJ Open Diab Res Care: first published as 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000911 on 13 November 2019. Downloaded from disease.9–11 Although insulin resistance is an important by bioelectrical impedance. Height was measured to the determinant of cardiometabolic diseases, a direct measure nearest 0.1 cm, while body weight was measured with a cali- of insulin sensitivity by the gold standard euglycemic hyper- brated electronic scale to the nearest 0.1 kg. Waist circum- insulinemic clamp technique12 is impractical for large-scale ference was measured at the umbilical level, at the midpoint epidemiological studies, due to the laborious, expensive, between the iliac crest and the rib cage. The BMI was and time- consuming procedure required. Therefore, many calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by height in surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity have been proposed square meters (kg/m2). Blood pressure was measured after using anthropometric variables, fasting insulin and/or a 5 min rest at the right upper arm, in the sitting position, glucose levels or insulin and glucose levels during an oral with a sphygmomanometer for three times and the mean glucose tolerance test (OGTT).13–15 An ideal surrogate was used in the analyses. Pulse pressure was calculated as index of insulin sensitivity for use in large epidemiolog- the difference between systolic blood pressure and diastolic ical studies should be based on affordable anthropometric blood pressure. A value of pulse pressure ≥60 mm Hg was and/or laboratory measures routinely gathered in clinical used as index of increased vascular stiffness.32 A 75 g OGTT settings. Among these, the visceral adiposity index (VAI),16 was performed with basal and 2- hour postload sampling for and the lipid accumulation product (LAP), both based on plasma glucose assays. On the second day, after a 12- hour anthropometric and laboratory parameters17 have been fasting, participants underwent a euglycemic hyperinsu- developed and analyzed in relation to homeostatic model linemic clamp study, as previously described.33 Briefly, assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA- IR), but not to a priming dose of insulin was administrated during the the gold standard measure of insulin sensitivity assessed by early 10 min to acutely increase plasma insulin followed the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp method.18–25 Addi- by continuous insulin infusion fixed at 40 mU/m2 × min. tionally, two other surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity Blood glucose levels were maintained constant during the based on plasma triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipo- 2- hour clamp study by infusing 20% glucose at varying protein cholesterol (HDL- C) measurements, that is, the rates according to blood glucose measurements assessed triglycerides × fasting glucose (TyG) index and TG/HDL-C by a glucose analyzer at 5 min intervals. Glucose metabo- concentration ratio, have been suggested as surrogate esti- lized by the whole body (M) was calculated as the mean mates of insulin sensitivity, and validated in comparison rate of glucose infusion measured during the last 60 min of to the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp method,26 the the clamp examination (steady state) and was expressed as copyright. steady- state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration during milligrams per minute per kilogram fat- free mass (MFFM). the insulin suppression test27 or a 3-hour hyperglycemic Subjects were considered insulin resistant when they were 28 clamp test. Although these two lipid- based surrogate in the lower quartile of MFFM values of the study cohort. indexes have been studied in non- diabetic individuals, Carotid IMT was measured by ATL HDI 3000 ultrasound in subjects with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and in system (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, WA) patients with type 2 diabetes,26–28 it is unknown whether equipped with a 5 MHz linear array transducer as previ- they might be useful in the identification