DOCSLIB.ORG

ZALICO VARIABLE ANNUITY SEPARATE ACCOUNT Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ZALICO VARIABLE ANNUITY SEPARATE ACCOUNT Form SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 485BPOS Post-effective amendments [Rule 485(b)] Filing Date: 2017-04-28 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-17-148044 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER ZALICO VARIABLE ANNUITY SEPARATE ACCOUNT Mailing Address Business Address 2500 WESTFIELD DRIVE 2500 WESTFIELD DRIVE CIK:353448| IRS No.: 363050975 | State of Incorp.:IL | Fiscal Year End: 1231 LEGAL DEPARTMENT LEGAL DEPARTMENT Type: 485BPOS | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-22375 | Film No.: 17795273 ELGIN IL 60123 ELGIN IL 60123 847-930-7272 ZALICO VARIABLE ANNUITY SEPARATE ACCOUNT Mailing Address Business Address 2500 WESTFIELD DRIVE 2500 WESTFIELD DRIVE CIK:353448| IRS No.: 363050975 | State of Incorp.:IL | Fiscal Year End: 1231 LEGAL DEPARTMENT LEGAL DEPARTMENT Type: 485BPOS | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-03199 | Film No.: 17795274 ELGIN IL 60123 ELGIN IL 60123 847-930-7272 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 2017 Registration Nos. 333-22375 and 811-3199 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM N-4 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ☐ Pre-Effective Amendment No. ☐ Post-Effective Amendment No. 28 ☒ And REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 ☒ Amendment No. 130 ZALICO VARIABLE ANNUITY SEPARATE ACCOUNT (formerly KILICO VARIABLE ANNUITY SEPARATE ACCOUNT) (Exact Name of Registrant) ZURICH AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (formerly KEMPER INVESTORS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY) (Name of Depositor) 1299 Zurich Way, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 (Address of Depositors Principal Executive Offices) Depositors Telephone Number, including Area Code: (425) 577-5100 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Name and Address of Agent for Service: Copy to: Juanita M. Thomas, Esq. Richard T. Choi, Esq. 1114 Georgia Street Carlton Fields Jorden Burt Louisiana, MO 63353 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W., Suite 400 East Washington, DC 20007-5208 It is proposed that this filing will become effective: ☐ Immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 ☒ On May 1, 2017, pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 ☐ 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a) of Rule 485 ☐ On pursuant to paragraph (a) of Rule 485 Title of securities being registered: Units of interest in a separate account under individual and group variable, fixed and market value adjusted deferred annuity contracts. Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents Individual and Group Variable, Fixed, and Market Value Adjusted Deferred Annuity Contracts Issued by Prospectus Zurich American Life Insurance Company Through May 1, 2017 ZALICO Variable Annuity Separate Account Service Center Scudder SM Home Office Scudder Destinations Service Team SM 1299 Zurich Way PO Box 19097 Destinations Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 Greenville, SC 29602-9097 Annuity Phone: 1-800-449-0523 (toll free) www.zurichamericanlifeinsurance.com 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time M-F This Prospectus describes the Scudder DestinationsSM Annuity, a variable, fixed and market value adjusted deferred annuity contract (the Contract) offered by Zurich American Life Insurance Company (we or ZALICO). The Contract is designed to provide annuity benefits for retirement that may or may not qualify for certain federal tax advantages. Depending on particular state requirements, the Contract may have been issued on a group or individual basis. The Contract is currently not being issued. Investing in this Contract involves risk, including possible loss of some or all of your investment. You may allocate Purchase Payments to one or more of the variable options or the Fixed Account Option, or the Market Value Adjustment (MVA) Option (the MVA Option) in states where an MVA is authorized. The availability of the Fixed Account Option and the MVA Option may be restricted in some states. The Contract currently offers 21 variable options, each of which is a Subaccount of ZALICO Variable Annuity Separate Account that invests solely in shares of one of the Portfolios listed below. Currently, you may choose to invest among the following Portfolios: AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) (Series I Shares): Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund The Alger Portfolios (Class I-2 Shares): Alger Balanced Portfolio Alger Capital Appreciation Portfolio Deutsche Investments VIT Funds (Class A Shares): Deutsche Equity 500 Index VIP Deutsche Variable Series I (Class A Shares): Deutsche Bond VIP Deutsche Capital Growth VIP Deutsche Global Small Cap VIP Deutsche Core Equity VIP Deutsche CROCI® International VIP Deutsche Variable Series II (Class A Shares): Deutsche Global Income Builder VIP Deutsche Global Equity VIP Deutsche Small Mid Cap Value VIP Deutsche Global Growth VIP Deutsche Government & Agency Securities VIP Deutsche High Income VIP Deutsche CROCI® U.S. VIP (formerly Deutsche Large Cap Value VIP)1 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Deutsche Government Money Market VIP Deutsche Small Mid Cap Growth VIP Deutsche Unconstrained Income VIP Dreyfus Investment Portfolios (Initial Share Class): Dreyfus Investment Portfolios, MidCap Stock Portfolio The Dreyfus Sustainable U.S. Equity Portfolio, Inc. (formerly The Dreyfus Socially Responsible Growth Fund, Inc.) (Initial Share Class)2 1 Effective May 1, 2017, Deutsche Large Cap Value VIP changed its name to Deutsche CROCI® U.S. VIP. 2 Effective May 1, 2017, The Dreyfus Socially Responsible Growth Fund, Inc. changed its name to The Dreyfus Sustainable U.S. Equity Portfolio, Inc. We may add or delete Subaccounts and Portfolios in the future. The Contract Value that you allocate to any of the Subaccounts will vary, reflecting the investment experience of the Portfolio in which the selected Subaccount invests. The Contract Value that you allocate to the Fixed Account or one or more Guarantee Periods of the MVA Option accumulates interest at rates set in advance by ZALICO. Please be aware that Market Value Adjustments are sensitive to changes in interest rates. If you withdraw money from a Guarantee Period before its term has expired, and during a period of rising interest rates, you likely will be assessed a negative Market Value Adjustment. In times of rising interest rates, the negative Market Value Adjustment could result in a substantial downward adjustment to vour Contract Value. Before you take a withdrawal from a Guarantee Period, you should know its expiration date, and ask the Service Center to calculate whether a Market Value Adjustment will apply and how much it will be. PAGE 1 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents The Contracts are not insured by the FDIC. They are obligations of the issuing insurance company and not a deposit of, or guaranteed by, any bank or savings institution and are subject to risks, including possible loss of principal. This Prospectus contains important information about the Contracts that you should know before investing. You should read it before investing and keep it for future reference. We have filed a Statement of Additional Information (SAI) with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The current SAI has the same date as this Prospectus and is incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. You may obtain a free copy by contacting the Service Center. A table of contents for the SAI appears at the end of this Prospectus. You may also find this Prospectus and other information about the Separate Account required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at the SECs web site at http://www.sec.gov. The date of this Prospectus is May 1, 2017. The Securities and Exchange Commission has not approved or disapproved the Contract or determined that this Prospectus is accurate or complete. Anyone who tells you otherwise is committing a U.S. Federal crime. Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee PAGE 2 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEFINITIONS 5 SUMMARY 7 SUMMARY OF EXPENSES 10 EXAMPLE 14 REDEMPTION FEES 15 DISTRIBUTION COSTS 15 CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION 15 ZALICO, THE MVA OPTION, THE SEPARATE ACCOUNT AND THE FUNDS 16 A. Zurich American Life Insurance Company 16 B. Risks of Managing General Account Assets 16 C. Financial Condition of the Company 17 D. The Guarantee Periods of the MVA Option 18 E. The Separate Account 18 F. The Funds 19 G. Selection of Funds 22 H. Change of Investments 23 FIXED ACCOUNT OPTION 24 THE CONTRACTS 24 A. General Information 24 B. The Accumulation Period 25 1. Application of Purchase Payments 25 2. Accumulation Unit Value 26 3. Guarantee Periods of the MVA Option 26 4. Establishment of Guaranteed Interest Rates 27 5. Contract Value 28 6. Transfers During the Accumulation Period 28 7. Policy and Procedures Regarding Disruptive Trading and Market Timing 30 8. Withdrawals During the Accumulation Period 33 9. Market Value Adjustment 35 10. Guaranteed Death Benefit 36 CONTRACT CHARGES AND EXPENSES 37 A. Charges Against The Separate Account 38 1. Mortality and Expense Risk
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Farmers Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company NAIC Group Code.....0069, 0241 NAIC Company Code
    AMENDED FILING EXPLANATION Per the request of the NAIC, this amended filing is necessary due to electronic signatures showing up as invalid in the original filing. The only change in this amended filing is to the jurat page; it's being filed without electronic signatures. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANIES - ASSOCIATION EDITION *34339202120100107* QUARTERLY STATEMENT As of June 30, 2021 of the Condition and Affairs of the Farmers Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company NAIC Group Code.....0069, 0241 NAIC Company Code..... 34339 Employer's ID Number..... 13-2915260 (Current Period) (Prior Period) Organized under the Laws of RI State of Domicile or Port of Entry RI Country of Domicile US Incorporated/Organized..... December 10, 1976 Commenced Business..... December 1, 1977 Statutory Home Office 700 Quaker Lane .. Warwick .. RI .. US .. 02886-6669 (Street and Number) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) Main Administrative Office 700 Quaker Lane .. Warwick .. RI .. US .. 02886-6669 401-827-2400 (Street and Number) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) (Area Code) (Telephone Number) Mail Address PO Box 350, 700 Quaker Lane .. Warwick .. RI .. US .. 02887-0350 (Street and Number or P. O. Box) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) Primary Location of Books and Records 700 Quaker Lane .. Warwick .. RI .. US .. 02886-6669 800-638-4208 (Street and Number) (City or Town, State, Country and Zip Code) (Area Code) (Telephone Number) Internet Web Site Address www.farmers.com Statutory Statement Contact Kevin Paul Swift 800-638-4208 (Name) (Area Code) (Telephone Number) (Extension) [email protected] 401-827-2315 (E-Mail Address) (Fax Number) OFFICERS Name Title Name Title 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Part VII Transfers Pursuant to the UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
    PART VII TRANSFERS EFFECTED PURSUANT TO THE UK FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 www.sidley.com/partvii Sidley Austin LLP, London is able to provide legal advice in relation to insurance business transfer schemes under Part VII of the UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”). This service extends to advising upon the applicability of FSMA to particular transfers (including transfers involving insurance business domiciled outside the UK), advising parties to transfers as well as those affected by them including reinsurers, liaising with the FSA and policyholders, and obtaining sanction of the transfer in the English High Court. For more information on Part VII transfers, please contact: Martin Membery at [email protected] or telephone + 44 (0) 20 7360 3614. If you would like details of a Part VII transfer added to this website, please email Martin Membery at the address above. Disclaimer for Part VII Transfers Web Page The information contained in the following tables contained in this webpage (the “Information”) has been collated by Sidley Austin LLP, London (together with Sidley Austin LLP, the “Firm”) using publicly-available sources. The Information is not intended to be, and does not constitute, legal advice. The posting of the Information onto the Firm's website is not intended by the Firm as an offer to provide legal advice or any other services to any person accessing the Firm's website; nor does it constitute an offer by the Firm to enter into any contractual relationship. The accessing of the Information by any person will not give rise to any lawyer-client relationship, or any contractual relationship, between that person and the Firm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conservative Defense of Romer V. Evans Dale Carpenter University of Minnesota Law School
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 76 | Issue 2 Article 4 Spring 2001 A Conservative Defense of Romer v. Evans Dale Carpenter University of Minnesota Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Carpenter, Dale (2001) "A Conservative Defense of Romer v. Evans," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 76: Iss. 2, Article 4. Available at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol76/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Conservative Defense of Romer v. Evanst DALE CARPENTER" INTRODUCTION A conservative defense ofRomer v. Evans?' How could a conservative defend the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to strike down a Colorado state constitutional amendment repealing and prohibiting local gay civil rights laws? Wasn't the decision an unprincipled departure from the intentions of the Framers, the language of the Constitution, and the traditions of the nation? Wasn't it, in short, the very archetype of liberal judicial activism abhorred by conservatives? Many conservatives, including conservative legal scholars, have apparently thought so. Evans has been blasted in the conservative opinion pages of the NationalReview2 and the Weekly Standard,3 among many other popular-press outlets.4 Conservative legal scholars have launched a frontal assault on Evans, starting with an attack in the HarvardJournal ofLaw & PublicPolicy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideas Discussed, Strategies Presented at 8Th Calhoun County Super Council
    ¢ THE CALHOUN-LIBERTY 50 includes tax BHS OURNAL Prom CLJNews.com W ednesday Office located in Bristol, FL PAGE 16 J MARCH 27, 2013 Vol. 33, No. 13 ‘Behind the Scenes’ show this Sunday to focus on ‘FINDING BIGFOOT’ episode set in this area by Teresa Eubanks, Journal Editor It may be a few months before the Florida epi- sode of “Finding Big- foot” filmed here re- cently will air, but some of the background work done to create the show will be featured on Sun- day night’s “Finding Calhoun County’s elected officials take part in last week’s Super Council meeting in Blountstown. TERESA EUBANKS PHOTOS Bigfoot; Untold Sto- ries,” at 9 p.m. (ET) on Animal Planet. Ideas discussed, strategies presented While the “Finding Bigfoot” folks were film- ing their show at Torreya State Park, another crew at 8th Calhoun County Super Council was following them around to document how by Teresa Eubanks, Journal Editor of the Apalachicola River, thanks to the efforts of they put together the County commissioners, school board members, the Apalachicola Maritime Museum. popular series. council members from Altha and Blountstown, The boat, an authentic reproduction steam The second crew also along with the Blountstown City Manager and powered vessel, was built in 1983 and will offer filmed in Hosford dur- Assistant Manager gathered in the Heritage Room tours of the river with standing passenger service ing a “Town Hall” seg- at the Blountstown Library for the eighth Calhoun from Apalachicola to Chattahoochee and onto ment for the show, which County Super Council meeting Thursday night.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Equality and the Supreme Court a Guide to What Is at Stake in Upcoming Rulings
    Marriage Equality and the Supreme Court A Guide to What Is at Stake in Upcoming Rulings By Crosby Burns and Joshua Field June 10, 2013 This month the Supreme Court will deliver two historic rulings that will affect thou- sands of committed same-sex couples throughout the United States. InHollingsworth v. Perry, the Court will determine the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which stripped same-sex couples in California of their right to marriage in 2008.1 Approximately 109,000 same-sex couples lost the freedom to marry in California that year.2 In United States v. Windsor, the Court will rule on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, a federal law passed in 1996 that defines marriage as the union between a man and a woman for the purposes of more than 1,000 federal laws and programs.3 DOMA implicates everything from veterans’ benefits to immigra- tion to federal estate taxes, and it unfairly discriminates against legally married same-sex couples by denying them federal benefits and protections currently enjoyed by oppo- site-sex couples.4 In 2003 the Supreme Court affirmed the civil rights of gay and lesbian Americans in the landmark case Lawrence v. Texas by invalidating state antisodomy laws that prohibited consensual sex between people of the same gender.5 Ten years later the Supreme Court is poised to deliver two similarly monumental rulings that could have sweeping implica- tions for gay and lesbian couples in the United States. The Supreme Court has consistently and repeatedly affirmed that marriage
    [Show full text]
  • The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from a (Slightly) Blue State
    Tulsa Law Review Volume 40 Issue 3 The Legislative Backlash to Advances in Rights for Same-Sex Couples Spring 2005 The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from a (Slightly) Blue State John G. Culhane Stacey L. Sobel Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John G. Culhane, & Stacey L. Sobel, The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from a (Slightly) Blue State, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 443 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol40/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Culhane and Sobel: The Gay Marriage Backlash and Its Spillover Effects: Lessons from THE GAY MARRIAGE BACKLASH AND ITS SPILLOVER EFFECTS: LESSONS FROM A (SLIGHTLY) "BLUE STATE" John G. Culhane* and Stacey L. Sobel** I. INTRODUCTION Backlash, indeed! The stories streaming in from across the country can scarcely be believed. In Alabama, a legislator introduced a bill that would have banished any mention of homosexuality from all public libraries-even at the university level.' In Virginia, the legislature's enthusiasm for joining the chorus of states that have amended their constitutions to ban gay marriage was eclipsed by a legislator's suggestion that the state's license plates be pressed into service as political slogans, and made to read: "Traditional Marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Same-Sex Marriage Laws – Student Handout
    Timeline of Same-Sex Marriage Laws – Student Handout 1969 – Police enter the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village, New York City, on a routine raid aimed at arresting gay patrons and encounter violent resistance from the gay community. The event, known as the Stonewall riots, marks the beginning of the modern gay rights movement. 1970 – Jack Baker and Michael McConnell become the first same-sex couple to apply for a marriage license in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Their application is rejected and they lose their appeal. 1973 – Maryland becomes the first state to ban same-sex marriage. 1996 – President Bill Clinton signs the Defense of Marriage Act into law. DOMA says that neither the federal government nor states have to recognize same-sex marriages that were performed in another state, cutting off same-sex couples’ access to marriage benefits in many states. 2000 – Vermont becomes the first state to legalize civil unions between same-sex partners. 2001 – The Netherlands becomes the first country to legalize same-sex marriage. 2003 – The Federal Marriage Amendment is introduced to the House of Representatives. The amendment would add language to the Constitution stating that marriage should only occur between a man and a woman. 2004-2006 – 23 states ban same-sex marriage. 2008 – California bans same-sex marriage by popular vote on Proposition 8, a measure on the state ballot. The following year, the California state Supreme Court upholds that decision. 2011 – President Barack Obama tells the Department of Justice to stop defending DOMA in court, stating that it is unconstitutional. 2012 –Obama publicly states his support for same-sex marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • August 23, 2013
    Vol. 71, No. 33 Aug. 23, 2013 Hammack Ready, aim ... Soldiers from Battery A, 2nd Battalion, 77th Field Artillery Regiment, 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, adjust the tube on an M777 howitzer, Aug. 14. During its validation addresses phase, the team learned to efficiently and safely PCMS issues fire the M777. See story pages 10-11. By Andrea Stone Mountaineer staff Katherine Hammack, assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy and environment, topped off a three-day visit to Fort Carson by attending a naturalization ceremony at the Freedom Performing Arts Center, Aug. 15. After the ceremony, Hammack discussed the challenges Fort Carson faces at the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site. On Aug. 13, she met with representatives of the Las Animas County com- munity where PCMS is located to discuss issues related to the site. The Army was granted authority in 2007 to expand PCMS, but never acted on that authority. “We have never budgeted the funds, and we have never followed through on expansion because, as time went by, and with the pace of deployments and fighting the fight, we did not use Piñon Canyon as much as we would have if everyone was stationed at home,” Hammack said. With the reduced pace of deployments and the reduction in forces, there may not be a need for expansion. “Now that everybody’s coming home, we’re going to take a look and see if (there’s) any need to expand and, frankly, with the Army getting smaller, there’s a good chance we will not need to expand,” she said.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unfulfilled Promise: Lesbian and Gay Inequality Under American Law a National and State-By-State Snapshot
    An Unfulfilled Promise: Lesbian and Gay Inequality Under American Law A National and State-by-State Snapshot As of July 2011, the main outstanding federal policy adopted by Congress concerning lesbian and gay Americans discriminates explicitly. It is the so-called “Defense of Marriage Act” (which ignores same-sex couples’ marriages for federal law purposes and purports to allow states to do the same). Although the first gay civil rights bill was introduced in Congress more than 35 years ago, there remains no explicit federal statutory protection against sexual orientation discrimination.1 Support has grown for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would forbid sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in employment; the bill was heard in committee in the prior Congress, but there is no timetable for action in this Congress.2 Other bills to reduce federal discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans would allow an employee to take unpaid leave to care for an ill domestic partner as for a heterosexual spouse,3 include a domestic partner in COBRA’s requirement of temporary extension of health insurance for family members at the end of one’s employment,4 permit Americans to immigrate a foreign spouse or partner,5 and repeal the federal DOMA.6 Like ENDA, none of these has a timetable for action in this Congress. Constitutional Constitutional Statute or Statute Bars Statute Bars Limited Broad Status Marriage for State Amendment, Amendment Case Law Antigay Antigay Public Status for for Same-Sex Same-Sex
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop V
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 36 Issue 1 Article 3 January 2018 Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission Kyle C. Velte Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Kyle C. Velte, Why the Religious Right Can't Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through-Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 36(1) LAW & INEQ. (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol36/iss1/3 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 67 Why the Religious Right Can’t Have Its (Straight Wedding) Cake and Eat It Too: Breaking the Preservation-Through- Transformation Dynamic in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission Kyle C. Velte† Introduction In the 2017 term, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider the most significant LGBT-rights case since its 2015 marriage equality decision:1 Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.2 The case presents A question—what I call the Antidiscrimination Question3—that has been percolating through lower courts for nearly a decade: may small business owners, such as photographers, bakers, and florists, be exempt from state antidiscrimination laws based on their religious beliefs about same- sex marriage?4 The Religious Right5 has been squarely behind this † Visiting Assistant Professor, Texas Tech University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash
    MWP – 2016/04 Max Weber Programme Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash: Constitutionalism through the Lens of Consensus and Conflict AuthorReva B. Author Siegel and Author Author European University Institute Max Weber Programme Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash: Constitutionalism through the Lens of Consensus and Conflict Reva B. Siegel Max Weber Lecture No. 2016/04 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. ISSN 1830-7736 © Reva B. Siegel, 2016 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Abstract In the decades before the United States Supreme Court recognized the right of same-sex couples to marry in Obergefell v. Hodges, Americans disdained, denounced, and debated same-sex marriage. When state courts recognized the right of same-sex couples to marry, opponents passed laws and state constitutional amendments that defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman. This fierce conflict provoked argument about the capacity of courts to defend minority rights. Critics argued that judicial judgments shutting down politics were counterproductive and provoked a backlash that exacerbated political polarization. Conversation about the backlash ranged widely from academics and advocates to judges. These “realist” accounts of judicial review depicted courts as majoritarian institutions whose authority is tied to public consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Bmiforpactitioners.Pdf)
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2017 Identifying Osteosarcopenic Obesity in a Group of Older Women Julia E. (Julia Ellen) Inglis Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HUMAN SCIENCES IDENTIFYING OSTEOSARCOPENIC OBESITY IN A GROUP OF OLDER WOMEN By JULIA E. INGLIS A Dissertation presented to the Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 Julia E. Inglis defended this dissertation on February 28, 2017. The members of the supervisory committee were: Jasminka Ilich-Ernst Professor Directing Dissertation Dan McGee University Representative Bahram H. Arjmandi Committee Member Lynn Panton Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii To my grandfather, Harry B. Eisberg, Jr, MD, who also studied bone health iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to offer my utmost appreciation for Dr. Jasminka Ilich-Ernst, who was more than an advisor to me. She played a key role in guiding me with unlimited patience and energy and gave me all the support I could ask for. Her experience and knowledge has enlightened my education and my life, providing me with a vision for my person and my career. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Bahram Arjmandi, Dr. Lynn B. Panton, and Dr. Dan McGee for their valuable ideas, encouragement and compassion.
    [Show full text]