DOCSLIB.ORG

Spatiotemporal Diversification of the True Frogs (Genus Rana): a Historical Framework for a Widely Studied Group of Model Organi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spatiotemporal Diversification of the True Frogs (Genus Rana): a Historical Framework for a Widely Studied Group of Model Organi Syst. Biol. 65(5):824–842, 2016 © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syw055 Advance Access publication June 10, 2016 Spatiotemporal Diversification of the True Frogs (Genus Rana): A Historical Framework for a Widely Studied Group of Model Organisms , ZHI-Y ONG YUAN1 2,WEI-WEI ZHOU1,XIN CHEN3,NIKOLAY A. POYARKOV,JR.4,HONG-MAN CHEN1, NIAN-HONG JANG-LIAW5,WEN-HAO CHOU6,NICHOLAS J. MATZKE7,KOJI IIZUKA8,MI-SOOK MIN9, ,∗ ,∗ ,∗ ,∗ SERGIUS L. KUZMIN10,YA-PING ZHANG1 ,DAV I D C. CANNATELLA11 ,DAV I D M. HILLIS11 , AND JING CHE1 1State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan; 2Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, Yunnan; 3Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, HN 03755, USA; 4Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskiye Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russia; 5Animal Department, Taipei Zoo, 30 6 Xinguang Road, Sec. 2, Taipei 11656, Taiwan; Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural Science, 1st Kuang-Chien Road, Taichung 40453, Downloaded from Taiwan; 7Division of Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, ACT 2601, Australia; 8Kanda-Hitotsubashi JH School, 2-16-14 Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0003, Japan; 9Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife (CGRB), Research Institute for Veterinary Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, 151-742 Seoul, South Korea; 10 Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119234, Russia; and 11 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA ∗ Correspondence to be sent to: Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan or http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/ Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], catfi[email protected], [email protected] The first three authors share equal first authorship. Received 19 September 2015; reviews returned 11 December 2015; accepted 31 May 2015 Associate Editor: Richard Glor Abstract.—True frogs of the genus Rana are widely used as model organisms in studies of development, genetics, physiology, ecology, behavior, and evolution. Comparative studies among the more than 100 species of Rana rely on an understanding of the evolutionary history and patterns of diversification of the group. We estimate a well-resolved, time-calibrated phylogeny from sequences of six nuclear and three mitochondrial loci sampled from most species of Rana, and use that phylogeny to at University of Texas Austin on August 26, 2016 clarify the group’s diversification and global biogeography. Our analyses consistently support an “Out of Asia” pattern with two independent dispersals of Rana from East Asia to North America via Beringian land bridges. The more species-rich lineage of New World Rana appears to have experienced a rapid radiation following its colonization of the New World, especially with its expansion into montane and tropical areas of Mexico, Central America, and South America. In contrast, Old World Rana exhibit different trajectories of diversification; diversification in the Old World began very slowly and later underwent a distinct increase in speciation rate around 29–18 Ma. Net diversification is associated with environmental changes and especially intensive tectonic movements along the Asian margin from the Oligocene to early Miocene. Our phylogeny further suggests that previous classifications were misled by morphological homoplasy and plesiomorphic color patterns, as well as a reliance primarily on mitochondrial genes. We provide a phylogenetic taxonomy based on analyses of multiple nuclear and mitochondrial gene loci. [Amphibians; biogeography; diversification rate; Holarctic; transcontinental dispersal.] Biodiversity is distributed heterogeneously across of early, rapid cladogenesis followed by a slowdown Earth. Consequently, the determinants of spatial in diversification rate is thought to be related to patterns of diversity are of paramount interest ecological constraints (Schluter 2001; Rabosky 2009). for biologists (Gaston 2000; Ricklefs 2004). Broadly Further, increases in cladogenesis are often associated distributed, species-rich clades provide an opportunity with broad-scale environmental changes or geological to explore the evolutionary processes that drive diversity processes (e.g., orogenesis). across large spatiotemporal scales (e.g., Derryberry et al. Diverse clades that are distributed across several 2011; McGuire et al. 2014). Methods combining the major continental areas provide excellent opportunities dynamics of diversification (e.g., speciation, extinction) to compare patterns of distribution and diversification with biogeographic history allow biologists to test in different regions (Qian and Ricklefs 2000; McGuire hypotheses of diversification within and between et al. 2014). In this article we investigate the spatial regions (Ricklefs 2004; Wiens and Donoghue 2004; and temporal patterns of regional and continental-scale Mittelbach et al. 2007). biodiversity in a widely studied clade that is broadly If speciation and extinction rates (ignoring dispersal distributed across Eurasia and the Americas, the true for the moment) are roughly constant across geographic frogs (genus Rana, sensu AmphibiaWeb 2015). areas, then species diversity is influenced by time- True frogs are extensively used as model organisms in dependent processes (McPeek and Brown 2007). studies of development, genetics, physiology, behavior, However, changes in speciation rate (e.g., by adaptive ecology, and evolution (see Duellman and Trueb 1986). radiations) or extinction rate (e.g., by climate effects) The first successful laboratory cloning experiment of can quickly disrupt the correlation between clade age an animal (transfer of a nucleus into an enucleated and species diversity. In many radiations, a pattern egg, resulting in a normal organism) was conducted 824 2016 YUAN ET AL.—SPATIOTEMPORAL DIVERSIFICATION OF THE TRUE FROGS 825 in Rana pipiens (Briggs and King 1952), and various The family Ranidae began to diversify about 57 Ma species of Rana continue to be used widely in studies (Bossuyt et al. 2006; Wiens et al. 2009), long after the of physiology and genetics. Many species of Rana are breakup of Pangaea (>120 Ma, Sanmartín et al. 2001). also commonly studied in the field as well as the Therefore, the global distribution of the family must laboratory. One of the most extensive monographs have resulted from intercontinental dispersal. Based on on the ecology and life history of an amphibian was limited sampling of Rana, Bossuyt et al. (2006) suggested based on Rana temporaria (Savage 1962), and studies that the ancestor(s) of the American Rana reached the of Rana ecology, behavior, conservation, and evolution New World in one or two waves from Eurasia, without have accelerated in recent years (reviewed by Hillis and specifying the route of dispersal. Macey et al. (2006) Wilcox 2005). suggested two alternative hypotheses: two dispersals More than 100 described species of Rana from Asia to America via Beringia, or one dispersal from (AmphibiaWeb 2015) range across Europe (12 species) Asia to America with a second back-dispersal to Asia. We and Asia (32 species), and from North America to asked the following questions: the northern half of South America (57, plus several Downloaded from recognized but not yet described species; Hillis and (1) When did the intercontinental dispersal of Rana Wilcox 2005). Species occur in a wide variety of occur between Eurasia and the Americas? Were habitats including tundra, temperate coniferous and these dispersals via trans-Atlantic land bridges deciduous forests, grasslands, deserts, brackish-water (Case 1978) or by trans-Beringian (Pacific) land bridges (Macey et al. 2006)? Was there only one marshes, freshwater streams and lakes, montane http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/ cascades, semitropical cloud forests, and tropical dispersal from Eurasia to the Americas, with rainforests (Hillis and Wilcox 2005). Many species a dispersal back to Eurasia, or were there two are of conservation concern, and several species are distinct dispersal events into the New World? recently extinct or threatened with extinction. Despite When did major dispersal events within Eurasia the diversity of the genus and its importance in many and the Americas occur (e.g., into Europe, and into biological investigations, no comprehensive analysis of the Neotropics)? the spatial patterns and drivers of diversity for Rana has been published. (2) To what extent was dispersal into new areas The Eurasian species are morphologically accompanied by increased diversification rates? conservative. They possess prominent dorsolateral Were speciation rates highest when a lineage at University of Texas Austin on August 26, 2016 folds, a dark temporal mask, and a body that is entered new regions, or were they relatively countershaded in various shades of brown, leading to constant? the common English name “brown frogs” (Boulenger (3) How did geologic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Phylogenetic Relationships of the Chinese Brown Frogs (Genus Rana)
    Phylogenetic Relationships of the Chinese Brown Frogs Title (Genus Rana) Inferred from Partial Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA Gene Sequences� Che, Jing; Pang, Junfeng; Zhao, Er-mi; Matsui, Masafumi; Author(s) Zhang, Ya-ping Citation Zoological Science (2007), 24(1): 71-80 Issue Date 2007-01 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/85329 Right (c) 日本動物学会 / Zoological Society of Japan Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE 24:71–80 (2007) © 2007 Zoological Society of Japan Phylogenetic Relationships of the Chinese Brown Frogs (Genus Rana) Inferred from Partial Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA Gene Sequences Jing Che1,2, Junfeng Pang2, Er-mi Zhao1, Masafumi Matsui3 and Ya-ping Zhang2* 1College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China 2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China 3Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan Based on partial sequences of the 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes, we estimated phylogenetic relationships among brown frogs of the Rana temporaria group from China. From the phylogenetic trees obtained, we propose to include Rana zhengi in the brown frogs. Monophyly of the brown frogs was not unambiguously supported, but four well-supported clades (A, B, C, and D) always emerged, although relationships among them remained unresolved. Clade A contained brown frogs with 24 chromosomes and was split into two distinct subclades (Subclade A-1: R. chensinensis and R. huanrenensis; Subclade A-2: R. dybowskii). Polytomous relationships among populations of R. chensinensis and R. huanrenensis suggested the necessity of further taxonomic assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Intraspecific Relationships of Populations of the Brown Frog Rana Sauteri (Ranidae) on Taiwan, Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome B Sequences
    ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE 26: 608–616 (2009) ¤ 2009 Zoological Society of Japan Intraspecific Relationships of Populations of the Brown Frog Rana sauteri (Ranidae) on Taiwan, Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Sequences Nian-Hong Jang-Liaw1* and Tsung-Han Lee2 1Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural Science, 1st Kuang-Chien Rd., Taichung 40453, Taiwan 2Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuo-Kuang Rd., Taichung 40227, Taiwan We studied the phylogenetic relationships among populations of Rana sauteri using partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene from 244 samples from 29 localities in Taiwan. We detected 77 haplotypes among these sequences. The phylogenetic trees contained five distinct lineages: the northern (NL), eastern (EL), southern hill (SHL), northern mountain (NML), and south- ern mountain (SML) lineages, defined by geographical distribution. The lineage phylogeny did not support the two-species hypothesis inferred from larval morphology. To describe the possible col- onization history of R. sauteri in Taiwan, we propose hypotheses of within-island differentiation and a multiple-invasion model. Using a molecular clock, we estimated the order of divergence times between lineages in order to test the migration hypothesis. The multiple-invasion model was well supported by the phylogeny and a nested clade network. Key words: Rana sauteri, mtDNA, cytochrome b, phylogeography, Taiwan include Guangxi Province, China (Tian and Jian, 1986; Zhao INTRODUCTION and Adler, 1993). Unfortunately, no specimens of R. sauteri Taiwan is a subtropical island located between 21°53’N from China were located for examination. Smith (1921) and 25°37’N, with mountains up to 3952 m high.
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Rana): a Historical Framework for a Widely Studied Group of Model Organisms
    Systematic Biology Advance Access published July 19, 2016 Syst. Biol. 0(0):1–19, 2016 © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syw055 Spatiotemporal Diversification of the True Frogs (Genus Rana): A Historical Framework for a Widely Studied Group of Model Organisms , ZHI-Y ONG YUAN1 2,WEI-WEI ZHOU1,XIN CHEN3,NIKOLAY A. POYARKOV,Jr.4,HONG-MAN CHEN1, NIAN-HONG JANG-LIAW5,WEN-HAO CHOU6,NICHOLAS J. MATZKE7,KOJI IIZUKA8,MI-SOOK MIN9, ,∗ SERGIUS L. KUZMIN10,YA-PING ZHANG1,DAV I D C. CANNATELLA11,DAV I D M. HILLIS11 , AND JING CHE1 1State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, and Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, Yunnan; 2Kunming College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, Yunnan; 3Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, HN 03755, USA; 4Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskiye Gory, GSP-1, Moscow 119991, Russia; 5Animal Department, Taipei Zoo, 30 Xinguang Road, Sec. 2, Taipei 11656, Taiwan; 6Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural Science, 1st Kuang-Chien Road, Taichung 40453, Taiwan; 7Division of Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, ACT 2601, Australia; 8Kanda-Hitotsubashi
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of a Chinese Frog, Rana Zhengi Zhao, 1999 Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome B Gene Sequences (Amphibia, Ranidae)
    Current Herpetology 20 (2): 77-84, December 2001 (C) 2001 by The Herpetological Society of Japan Phylogenetic Relationships of a Chinese Frog, Rana zhengi Zhao, 1999 Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Gene Sequences (Amphibia, Ranidae) MASAFUMI MATSUI,1* TOMOKO TANAKA-UENO,1 AND ZHENG-FA GAO2 1 Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies , Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, JAPAN 2 Middle School of Depending on Chemical Industrial Company of Sichuan , Qingbaijiang Qu, Chengdu 610300, Sichuan, CHINA Abstract: In order to assess phylogenetic relationships of a Chinese frog, Rana zhengi Zhao, 1999, the sequences of 587 base pairs of the mitochon- drial cytochrome b gene are compared with six species of Japanese (R. pirica, R. ornativentris, R. japonica, R. okinavana, R. tagoi, and R. tsushimensis), one species of Taiwanese (R. sauteri), one species of Russian (R. amurensis), and two species of European brown frogs (R. temporaria and R. dalmatina). The resultant phylogenetic tree suggests monophyly of R. zhengi and these brown frogs, and the earliest divergence of R. zhengi among all the ingroup species examined. Monophyly of R. zhengi and R. sauteri was rejected. For this reason, placement of R. zhengi within the brown frogs of the R. tempo- raria group requires further study, and separation of R. zhengi and R. sauteri as a distinct genus or subgenus Pseudorana is not supported. Key words: Brown frog; Cytochrome b; Phylogeny; Pseudorana; Rana zhengi; R. sauteri; China been proven to include cryptic species INTRODUCTION (Chou and Lin, 1997) and is considered to Rana zhengi was described from Zhang- form a species complex (Tanaka-Ueno et cun Village, Hongya Co., Sichuan Prov- al., 1998a).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary and Biogeographic Origins of High Tropical Diversity in Old World Frogs (Ranidae)
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00610.x EVOLUTIONARY AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC ORIGINS OF HIGH TROPICAL DIVERSITY IN OLD WORLD FROGS (RANIDAE) John J. Wiens,1,2 Jeet Sukumaran,3 R. Alexander Pyron4 and Rafe M. Brown3 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Natural History Museum, Biodiversity Research Center, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Dyche Hall, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7561 4Department of Biology, The Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York, New York 10016 Received May 24, 2008 Accepted November 17, 2008 Differences in species richness between regions are ultimately explained by patterns of speciation, extinction, and biogeographic dispersal. Yet, few studies have considered the role of all three processes in generating the high biodiversity of tropical regions. A recent study of a speciose group of predominately New World frogs (Hylidae) showed that their low diversity in temperate regions was associated with relatively recent colonization of these regions, rather than latitudinal differences in diversification rates (rates of speciation–extinction). Here, we perform parallel analyses on the most species-rich group of Old World frogs (Ranidae; ∼1300 species) to determine if similar processes drive the latitudinal diversity gradient. We estimate a time-calibrated phylogeny for 390 ranid species and use this phylogeny to analyze patterns of biogeography and diversification rates. As in hylids, we find a strong relationship between the timing of colonization of each region and its current diversity, with recent colonization of temperate regions from tropical regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Invasions of the Ryukyu Archipelago by Oriental Frogs of the Subgenus Odorrana with Phylogenetic Reassessment of the Related Subgenera of the Genus Rana
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37 (2005) 733–742 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multiple invasions of the Ryukyu Archipelago by Oriental frogs of the subgenus Odorrana with phylogenetic reassessment of the related subgenera of the genus Rana Masafumi Matsui a,¤, Tomohiko Shimada a, Hidetoshi Ota b, Tomoko Tanaka-Ueno a,c a Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan b Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan c Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi 484-8506, Japan Received 27 January 2005; revised 2 April 2005 Available online 16 June 2005 Abstract The genus Rana, notably diversiWed in Oriental regions from China to Southeast Asia, includes a group of cascade frogs assigned to subgenera Odorrana and Eburana. Among them, R. ishikawae and the R. narina complex represent the northernmost members occurring from Taiwan to the Ryukyu Archipelago of Japan. Relationships of these frogs with the continental members, as well as the history of their invasions to islands, have been unclear. The taxonomic status of Odorrana and related genera varies among authors and no phylogenetic reassessment has been done. Using partial sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes, we estimated phylogenetic relationships among 17 species of the section Hylarana including Odorrana and Eburana, and related species from the Ryukyus, Taiwan, China, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. We estimate that (1) Odorrana is monophyletic and encom- passes species of Eburana and R. hosii, which is now placed in Chalcorana, (2) the ancestor of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of the Chinese Brown Frogs (Genus Rana) Inferred from Partial Mitochondrial 12S and 16S Rrna Gene Sequences
    ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE 24:71–80 (2007) © 2007 Zoological Society of Japan Phylogenetic Relationships of the Chinese Brown Frogs (Genus Rana) Inferred from Partial Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA Gene Sequences Jing Che1,2, Junfeng Pang2, Er-mi Zhao1, Masafumi Matsui3 and Ya-ping Zhang2* 1College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China 2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China 3Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan Based on partial sequences of the 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes, we estimated phylogenetic relationships among brown frogs of the Rana temporaria group from China. From the phylogenetic trees obtained, we propose to include Rana zhengi in the brown frogs. Monophyly of the brown frogs was not unambiguously supported, but four well-supported clades (A, B, C, and D) always emerged, although relationships among them remained unresolved. Clade A contained brown frogs with 24 chromosomes and was split into two distinct subclades (Subclade A-1: R. chensinensis and R. huanrenensis; Subclade A-2: R. dybowskii). Polytomous relationships among populations of R. chensinensis and R. huanrenensis suggested the necessity of further taxonomic assessment. Rana kunyuensis proved to be the sister group to R. amurensis, and these two species formed Clade B. Clade C was composed of R. omeimontis and R. chaochiaoensis, and Clade D included R. sauteri, which has been placed in other ranid genera. These relationships did not change after adding pub- lished data, and monophyly of Subclade A-1, A-2, and other East Asian brown frogs with 24 chro- mosomes (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary and Biogeographic Origins of High Tropical Diversity in Old World Frogs (Ranidae)
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00610.x EVOLUTIONARY AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC ORIGINS OF HIGH TROPICAL DIVERSITY IN OLD WORLD FROGS (RANIDAE) John J. Wiens,1,2 Jeet Sukumaran,3 R. Alexander Pyron4 and Rafe M. Brown3 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Natural History Museum, Biodiversity Research Center, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Dyche Hall, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7561 4Department of Biology, The Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York, New York 10016 Received May 24, 2008 Accepted November 17, 2008 Differences in species richness between regions are ultimately explained by patterns of speciation, extinction, and biogeographic dispersal. Yet, few studies have considered the role of all three processes in generating the high biodiversity of tropical regions. A recent study of a speciose group of predominately New World frogs (Hylidae) showed that their low diversity in temperate regions was associated with relatively recent colonization of these regions, rather than latitudinal differences in diversification rates (rates of speciation–extinction). Here, we perform parallel analyses on the most species-rich group of Old World frogs (Ranidae; ∼1300 species) to determine if similar processes drive the latitudinal diversity gradient. We estimate a time-calibrated phylogeny for 390 ranid species and use this phylogeny to analyze patterns of biogeography and diversification rates. As in hylids, we find a strong relationship between the timing of colonization of each region and its current diversity, with recent colonization of temperate regions from tropical regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibia Mundi. 1.2. Recent Amphibians: Generic and Infrageneric Taxonomic Additions (1981-2002)
    Alytes, 2005, 23 (1-2): 25-69.25 Amphibia Mundi. 1.2. Recent amphibians: generic and infrageneric taxonomic additions (1981-2002) Alain D*, Ronald I. C** & Frank G*** * Vertébrés: Reptiles et Amphibiens, USM 0602 Taxonomie and Collections, Département de Systématique and Evolution, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France <[email protected]> ** California Academy of Sciences, 875 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-3098, USA <[email protected]> *** Zoologische Staatssammlung, 81247 München, Germany <[email protected]> The present list concerns additions in the taxonomy of NEOBATRACHI (i.e., recent amphibians, taxa represented by at least one species in the currently living fauna of our planet: see D, 2004), for taxa at rank genus and below, published before 2003 after the three lists of recent amphibians taxa of F (1985), D (1993) and G et al. (1998) and the two lists of fossil taxa of this group of E (1981) and S (1998), or absent from these five lists.The period covered by these additions starts in 1981 for taxa of fossil gymnophiones and urodeles, in 1993 for taxa of recent amphibians, and in 1998 for taxa of fossil anurans. It ends on 31 December 2002 for all these groups.We tried to include all new nomina that had been overlooked in the lists cited above, or for which we identified errors in these lists. However, nomina of lower recent taxa anterior to 1993 not considered in F’s (1985) and D’s (1993) checklists (i.e., most synonyms and most nomina of valid subgenera and subspe- cies) were not included, as their inclusion would have increased the present list by hundreds, if not thousands, of nomina.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Raninae (Anura: Ranidae) Inferred from Mitochondrial and Nuclear Sequences
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43 (2007) 1–13 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of Raninae (Anura: Ranidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear sequences Jing Che a,b, Junfeng Pang b, Hui Zhao c, Guan-fu Wu c, Er-mi Zhao a,c,¤, Ya-ping Zhang b,d,¤ a College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China b Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China c Chengdu Institute of Biology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China d Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resources, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China Received 20 January 2006; revised 22 November 2006; accepted 22 November 2006 Available online 13 December 2006 Abstract Phylogenetic relationships among representative species of the subfamily Raninae were investigated using approximately 2000 base pairs of DNA sequences from two mitochondrial (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA) and two nuclear (tyrosinase, rhodopsin) genes. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using maximum parsimony, Bayesian, and maximum likelihood analyses. Comparison between the nuclear and mitochondrial Wndings suggested that our Wnal combined data has higher resolving power than the separate data sets. The tribes Stauro- ini and Ranini formed a sistergroup relationship, and within Ranini, ten major clades were consistently resolved among all analyses based on the Wnal combined data, although the phylogenetic relationships among the ten clades were not well resolved. Our result refuted sev- eral previous taxonomic divisions: the genus Pseudoamolops was invalid, and the monophyly of the genera Amolops and Rana were not supported. We suggest elevating Raninae to familial status, and recognizing within the family, at least twelve genera including Staurois, Meristogenys, Clinotarsus, Amolops, Hylarana, Babina, Odorrana, Pseudorana, Rana, Lithobates, Glandirana, and Pelophylax.
    [Show full text]
  • WWF Project Technical Report, China Herpetological Conservation Action Plan, I
    WWF Project Technical Report China Herpetological Conservation Action Plan I: Amphibians LI Pi-peng Institute of Herpetology, Shenyang Normal University IUCN Amphibian Specialist Group-China Region 2010-12-20 Acknowledgements Thanks are given to the World Wildlife Fund, the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Conservation International officials for supporting this work. Thanks are also given to the participants of the "2008 China Amphibian Conservation Action Plan Meeting" and the "2010 China's Action Plan I for Amphibians and Reptiles: amphibian draft discussion" for supporting this work. The English language version of this Action Plan was produced with support from the IUCN SSC ASG with special thanks to Hon Ki Chan, Alex Yeung, Edward Lau and Emily Cressey. Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 2 Target 1. Establishing an Institution for the China Amphibian Conservation Action Plan ...... 7 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Responsibilities of the Secretariat .................................................................................. 8 1.3 Public Education ............................................................................................................. 9 1.4 Building a Network with NGOs ....................................................................................... 9 1.5 Establishing
    [Show full text]