DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Review of EU Trademark

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Review of EU Trademark Annual Review of EU Trademark Law 2014 in Review Guy Heath, Nabarro LLP London, United Kingdom with Georg Jahn, Noerr LLP Munich, Germany Anne Marie Verschuur, NautaDutilh Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jordi Güell, Curell Suñol Barcelona, Spain Pier Luigi Roncaglia, Studio Legale SIB Florence, Italy Meriem Loudiyi, INLEX Paris, France Alistair Payne, Matheson Dublin, Ireland Ivo Rungg, Binder Grösswang Vienna, Austria Nina Ringen, Rønne & Lundgren Copenhagen, Denmark Christian Sundén, Lindahl Stockholm, Sweden March–April, 2015 Vol. 105 No. 2 INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION Powerful Network Powerful Brands 655 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017-5646 Telephone: +1 (212) 768-9887 email: [email protected] Facsimile: +1 (212) 768-7796 OFFICERS OF THE ASSOCIATION J. SCOTT EVANS ..................................................................................................................... President RONALD VAN TUIJL ..........................................................................................................President Elect JOSEPH FERRETTI ........................................................................................................... Vice President TISH L. BERARD .............................................................................................................. Vice President DAVID LOSSIGNOL ................................................................................................................... Treasurer AYALA DEUTSCH ..................................................................................................................... Secretary DAVID FLEMING ......................................................................................................................... Counsel ETIENNE SANZ DE ACEDO ................................................................................... Chief Executive Officer The Trademark Reporter Committee EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR-IN-CHIEF JONATHAN MOSKIN Senior Editors JESSICA ELLIOTT GLENN MITCHELL DANIEL C. GLAZER NEIL WILKOF KATHLEEN E. MCCARTHY RAFFI V. ZEROUNIAN Editor Staff Editor-in-Chief Senior Periodicals Editor BEVERLY HARRIS LISA BUTKIEWICZ JOEL L. BROMBERG Editors TSAN ABRAHAMSON ANDREW J. GRAY IV FABRIZIO MIAZZETTO HAKAN AKDAG JENNIFER LYNN GREGOR NANCY A. MILLER FEDERICO ALVARADO MASCHA GRUNDMANN JENNIFER MILLONES NIDHI ANAND GUY HEATH MANUEL MORANTE BRYAN BAER HANNA KARIN HELD CHIKAKO MORI MARIA BARATTA CHRISTINE HERNANDEZ MARIANO MUNICOY MARTIN J. BERAN ERIN HICKEY JOHN M. MURPHY DANIEL R. BERESKIN ANNE HIARING HOCKING PAUL MUSSELL STEFANIA BERGIA JANET L. HOFFMAN ROBERT M. O’CONNELL PETER BOLGER GANG HU HELENA WASSEN OESTROEM LANNING G. BRYER HENRY W. HUFFNAGLE JENIFER DEWOLF PAINE SHELDON BURSHTEIN DOMINIC HUI JEREMY B. PENNANT FILIPE FONTELES CABRAL SANDRA IRIARTE SCOTT D. PHILLIPS KATHERINE P. CALIFA PETER ISRAILOFF NEAL PLATT LEIGHTON CASSIDY E. DEBORAH JAY SUSAN RECTOR AI-TANG IRENE CHANG MARIA JOSE JIRON CINDY REICHELT PAMELA CHESTEK PAUL JONES ALEXANDRA ROBERTS SIMON CLARK SIEGRUN D. KANE DARREN W. SAUNDERS JANE F. COLLEN KOMAL KAUL MATTHEW R. SCHANTZ LAURENCE COLTON BISMAN KAUR MARTIN PETER SCHMIDT JOHN M. CONE LAURA KEES AARON SILVERSTEIN RUTH CORBIN SUSAN J. KERI GIULIO ENRICO SIRONI THEODORE H. DAVIS JR. ELIZABETH W. KING WENDI E. SLOANE ANNE DESMOUSSEAUX DARLENE S. KLINKSIECK JERRE SWANN JR. IGNACIO DOMINGUEZ ROLAND KUNZE PAUL TACKABERRY REX A. DONNELLY JOI MICHELLE LAKES OLIVIER TAILLIEU THOMAS F. DUNN ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE CHRISTIAN THOMAS CLAUS M. ECKHARTT SCOTT LEBSON SCOTT THOMPSON KAREN L. ELBURG AURELIO HERNANDEZ LEHMANN CHITUA UZOH STEPHEN W. FEINGOLD CELIA LERMAN ANJALI VALSANGKAR ELISABETH KASZNAR FEKETE PAUL C. LLEWELLYN EDWARD E. VASSALLO GERALD L. FORD PILAR LOPEZ MATTHEW WALCH TARUN GANDHI MARCUS LUEPKE RITA WEEKS ALEXANDER J.A. GARCIA MARIE LUSSIER JORDAN S. WEINSTEIN ALEXANDRA GEORGE PAMELA MALLARI JOHN L. WELCH SANDRA GIBBONS J. DAVID MAYBERRY BRYAN K. WHEELOCK SZYMON GOGULSKI J. THOMAS MCCARTHY MEREDITH M. WILKES NEIL P. MELLISHIP Advisory Board MILES J. ALEXANDER ARTHUR J. GREENBAUM PASQUALE A. RAZZANO WILLIAM M. BORCHARD ROBERT M. KUNSTADT SUSAN REISS CLIFFORD W. BROWNING THEODORE C. MAX PIER LUIGI RONCAGLIA LANNING G. BRYER VINCENT N. PALLADINO HOWARD J. SHIRE SANDRA EDELMAN JOHN B. PEGRAM JERRE B. SWANN SR. ANTHONY L. FLETCHER ALLAN S. PILSON STEVEN M. WEINBERG ROBERT L. RASKOPF The views expressed in The Trademark Reporter are those of the individual authors. The Trademark Reporter (ISSN 0041-056X) is published electronically six times a year by the International Trademark Association, 655 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017-5646 USA. INTA, the INTA logo, International Trademark Association, Powerful Network Powerful Brands, The Trademark Reporter, and inta.org are trademarks, service marks and/or registered trademarks of the International Trademark Association in the United States and certain other jurisdictions. The Trademark Reporter® (USPS 636-080) Copyright 2015, by the International Trademark Association All Rights Reserved Vol. 105 March–April, 2015 No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNUAL REVIEW OF EU TRADEMARK LAW 2014 in Review I. Introduction ................................................................... 476 A. About this Review .................................................................. 476 B. Legislative Change ................................................................ 477 C. OHIM’s Convergence Programme ......................................... 477 D. Organization of Material in this Review ............................... 479 II. “Signs” Capable of Registration, Description of Mark, and Specification of Goods and Services ...................... 480 A. Introductory Comments ......................................................... 480 B. Legal Texts ............................................................................. 480 C. Cases ...................................................................................... 481 1. EU—CJEU—Presentation of trade premises—Is it possible to register the design and layout of a retail store as a trademark? ...................................................... 481 2. EU General Court—Does use of a dotted line in the representation of a trademark filed at OHIM indicate that it is being used to show the location, on some underlying surface, of the trademark being claimed? ..... 484 This issue of THE TRADEMARK REPORTER® (TMR) should be cited as 105 TMR ___ (2015). 3. EU—General Court—How should one interpret a “class heading” specification used for a CTM from before June 16, 2003? ....................................................... 485 4. EU—CJEU—Retail services—Can a mark be registered in relation to “the bringing together of a variety of services”? .......................................................... 488 III. Absolute Grounds for Refusal of Registration, and for Cancellation ............................................................. 492 A. Introductory Comments ......................................................... 492 B. Legal Texts ............................................................................. 493 C. Cases ...................................................................................... 495 1. Germany—German Federal Supreme Court— Descriptiveness/Non-distinctiveness—Does a mark with several descriptive meanings have the necessary distinctiveness? ................................................................ 495 2. Austria—Austrian Supreme Court—Can “Jimi Hendrix” be considered a trademark with distinctive character—and is this true for all descriptions of goods and services? .......................................................... 498 3. Italy—Supreme Court—Composite trademark—The protection of the word “Oro” (i.e., “Gold” in English) in the food industry—Does distinctiveness acquired through use of a composite trademark concern only the composite trademark as a whole or also each of its elements? ..................................................................... 499 4. EU—General Court—Should an applicant who invents a word to describe a method of physical exercise be granted trademark protection for that word? ................................................................................ 502 5. Germany—German Federal Supreme Court—Can an application for cancellation for lack of distinctiveness be successfully countered by the defense that, by use of the trademark for many years without objection, the trademark owner has acquired vested rights in the continuity of the registration? ................................... 503 6. Benelux—Brussels Court of Appeal, Belgium—Can the yellow color be registered as a Benelux trademark for telecommunication services if it is only used in a part of Belgium? ............................................................... 505 7. EU—CJEU—Color Marks—Can EU national laws impose a particular high threshold for public awareness as a condition to registration of an abstract color mark? ........................................................ 506 8. United Kingdom—English High Court—Are “hybrid findings” sufficient to deny registration to shape marks? .............................................................................. 509 9. EU—CJEU—When does a shape “give substantial value” to the products? ..................................................... 513 10. EU—General Court—When is a trademark to be considered indistinguishable from the product to which it is applied? .......................................................... 517 11. EU—General Court—Is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Authorities Administering Import Certificate/Delivery Verification (IC/DV
    Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce Pt. 748, Supp. 4 (v) In-country transfers. To request an in- Block 3: Nature of Business of Ultimate country transfer, you must specify ‘‘in-coun- Consignee named in Block 1. Complete both try transfer’’ in Block 9 (Special Purpose) ‘‘A’’ and ‘‘B’’. and mark ‘‘Reexport’’ in Block 5 (Type of Possible choices for ‘‘A’’ include: broker, Application) of the BIS–748P ‘‘Multipurpose distributor, fabricator, manufacturer, whole- Application’’ form. The application also saler, retailer, value added reseller, original must specify the same foreign country for equipment manufacturer, etc. both the original ultimate consignee and the Possible choices for ‘‘B’’ include: contrac- new ultimate consignee. tual, franchise, distributor, wholesaler, con- tinuing and regular individual business, etc. [61 FR 12812, Mar. 25, 1996] Block 4: Additional Information. Provide any other information not appearing else- EDITORIAL NOTE: For FEDERAL REGISTER ci- where on the form such as other parties to tations affecting supplement no. 2 to part the transaction, and any other material 748, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, facts that may be of value in considering li- which appears in the Finding Aids section of cense applications supported by this state- the printed volume and on GPO Access. ment. Block 5: Assistance in Preparing State- SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 TO PART 748—BIS– ment. Name all persons, other than employ- 711, STATEMENT BY ULTIMATE CON- ees of the ultimate consignee or purchaser, SIGNEE AND PURCHASER INSTRUC- who assisted in the preparation of this form. Block 6: Ultimate Consignee. Enter the re- TIONS quested information and sign the statement All information must be typed or legibly in ink.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Trademark Law and Practice
    WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION INTRODUCTION TO TRADEMARK LAW & PRACTICE THE BASIC CONCEPTS A WIPO TRAINING MANUAL GENEVA 1993 (Second Edition) ( ( WIPO PUBLICATION No 653 (El ISBN 92-805-0167-4 WIPO 1993 PREFACE The present publication is the second edition of a volume of the same title that was published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1987 and reprinted in 1990. The first edition was written by Mr. Douglas Myall, former Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, United Kingdom. The present revised edition of the publication has been prepared by Mr. Gerd Kunze, Vevey, Switzerland, and reflects his extensive expertise and experience in the administration of the trademark operations of a large international corporation, Nestle S. A., as well as his intensive involvement, as a leading representative of several international non-governmental organizations, in international meetings convened by WIPO. This publication is intended to provide a practical introduction to trademark administration for those with little or no experience of the subject but who may have to deal with it in an official or business capacity. Throughout the text, the reader is invited to answer questions relating to the text. Those questions are numbered to correspond to the answers that are given, with a short commentary, in Appendix I. Arpad Bogsch Director General World Intellectual Property Organization February 1993 ( ( LIST OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. TRADEMARKS AND OTHER SIGNS: A GENERAL SURVEY 7 1.1 Use of trademarks in commerce . 9 1.2 What is a trademark?. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9 1.3 Need for legal protection .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 1.4 How can a trademark be protected? .
    [Show full text]
  • I Trademark Classification
    APPENDIX I I Trademark Classification • Goods o Class 1 Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; manures; fire extinguishing compositions; tempering and soldering prepara­ tions; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; tanning substances; adhesives used in industry. o Class 2 Paints, varnishes, lacquers; preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood; colorants; mordants; raw natural resins; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and arts. o Class 3 Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices. o Class 4 Industrial oils and greases; lubricants; dust absorbing, wetting and binding compositions; fuels (including motor spirit) and illuminates; candles, wicks. o Class 5 Pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth, dental wax; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides. 112 Trademark Classification 113 o Class 6 Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery, small items of metal hardware; pipes and tubes of metal; safes; goods of
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING a MARK an Introduction to Trademarks for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
    Intellectual Property for Business Series Number: 1 MAKING A MARK An Introduction to Trademarks for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION Publications in the “Intellectual Property for Business” series: 1. Making a Mark: An Introduction to Trademarks for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. WIPO publication No. 900. 2. Looking Good: An introduction to Industrial Designs for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. WIPO publication No. 498. 3. Inventing the Future: An introduction to Patents for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. WIPO publication No. 917. 4. Creative Expression: An introduction to Copyright for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. WIPO publication No. 918 (forthcoming). All publications available from the WIPO e-bookshop at: www.wipo.int/ebookshop Disclaimer: The information contained in this guide is not meant as a substitute for professional legal advice. Its purpose is to provide basic information on the subject matter. www.wipo.int/sme/ WIPO Copyright (2006) No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronically or mechanically, except as permitted by law, without written permission from the owner of the copyright. Preface This guide is the first in a series of guides on “Intellectual Property for Business.” It is devoted to trademarks, a central element in the marketing and branding strategy of any company. This guide seeks to explain trademarks from a business perspective. Its approach is practical and explanations are illustrated with examples and pictures to enhance the reader’s understanding. Small and Medium-sized Entreprises (SMEs) are encouraged to use the guide with a view to integrating their trademark strategy into their overall business strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING a MARK an Introduction to Trademarks for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Malawi Publications in the “Intellectual Property for Business” Series
    Intellectual Property for Business Series Number: 1 MAKING A MARK An Introduction to Trademarks for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Malawi Publications in the “Intellectual Property for Business” series: 1. Making a Mark: An Introduction to Trademarks for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Malawi. Department of Registrar General, publication No. 001. 2. Looking Good: An introduction to Industrial Designs for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Malawi. Department of Registrar General, publication No. 002. 3. Inventing the Future: An introduction to Patents for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Malawi. Department of Registrar General, publication No. 003. 4. Creative Expression: An introduction to Copyright for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Malawi. Department of Registrar General, publication No. 004. All publications available from the Department of Registrar General, Fatima Arcade, P.O. Box 100, Blantyre, Tel: 01 824355/795, Fax: 01 821686, E-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer: ‘This publication has been customized and reproduced with the prior express permission of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), the copyright owner of the original English version, which is available at www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/guides/. As such, WIPO is not liable or responsible for the accuracy or correctness of the customized version of the publication, as that liability or responsibility rests solely with the Department of the Registrar General, Ministry of Justice of Malawi. “Department of the Registrar General, Ministry of Justice of Malawi (2011)”. WIPO owns copyright in the original English language version (2006). P' reface Until recently, Intellectual Property has been viewed as luxury by industry and in particular, by the Small and Medium-sized Entreprizes (SMEs).
    [Show full text]
  • Trademark Status and Trademark Registration Faqs,How to Check Trademark Status?,Step by Step Guide for Ipindia Trademark Search
    Trademark status and Trademark registration FAQs In this article, We are going to discuss various FAQs related to trademark registration and trademark FAQs. For detailed FAQs on Trademark search in India, you can check out these links : FAQs on trademark search part1 and part 2. Q – What are the different steps involved in trademark registration in India? A – Steps involved in trademark registration in India are – Search of trademark Filing of trademark application Examination of trademark application by authority Post Examination opposition from general public Registration of trademark Q – What id trademark search? A – Trademark search is one of the most important steps in trademark registration. It is a part of due diligence to search for a brand name or a keyword that already has not been trademarked by some other firm. Q – How to file trademark applications? A – Trademark application can be filed both online as well as offline mode. Trademark applications should be supported with mandatory documents. It is also important to file trademark applications in relevant classes or classes. Q – Who will examine trademark application? A – Your trademark application is reviewed by a trademark examiner post filing of trademark application with relevant documents. This examination is done under the guidelines issued under Trademarks Act, 2016. A mandatory examination report has to be sent to the applicant within 30 days of trademark application filing. Q – Can trademark examiner reject trademark application? A – Yes, trademark examiner has full authority to reject a trademark application at outset. Examiner can also raise objections in his examination report. Applicants need to reply to these objections within 30 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the 1999 Trademark Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Stephen R
    American University Law Review Volume 49 | Issue 6 Article 4 2000 Review of the 1999 Trademark Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Stephen R. Baird Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Intellectual Property Commons Recommended Citation Baird, Stephen R. (2000) "Review of the 1999 Trademark Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ," American University Law Review: Vol. 49: Iss. 6, Article 4. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol49/iss6/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review of the 1999 Trademark Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Keywords Trademark, Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) This article is available in American University Law Review: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol49/iss6/4 BAIRDJCI.DOC 6/19/2001 10:51 AM AREA SUMMARIES REVIEW OF THE 1999 TRADEMARK DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT * STEPHEN R. BAIRD TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...................................................................................1322 I. The Federal Circuit Addresses Procedural Issues ................1323 A. Standard of Review........................................................1324 B. Standing to Oppose an “Immoral” or “Scandalous” Mark ..............................................................................1326 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Language Trademarks in Japan: the Linguistic Challenge
    University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review Volume 1 Issue 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI YEARBOOK Article 13 OF INTERNATIONAL LAW VOLUME 1 1-1-1991 Foreign Language Trademarks in Japan: The Linguistic Challenge Rosalynn Frank Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Rosalynn Frank, Foreign Language Trademarks in Japan: The Linguistic Challenge, 1 U. Miami Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 206 (1991) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr/vol1/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRADEMARKS IN JAPAN: THE LINGUISTIC CHALLENGE ROSALYNN FRANK* SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION II. THE JAPANESE LANGUAGE III. JAPANESE TRADEMARK LAW A. THE BASICS B. LINGUISTIC SIMILARITY IV. USE OF A TRADEMARK V. EXAMPLE ANALYSIS VI. CAUTIONS VII. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION As international commerce increases, foreign businesses need to become familiar with the different laws under which they will deal and be held accountable.' The protection of intellectual property rights is one of the most important issues arising in the context of international transactions, particularly in the Japanese market, which is prone to copying and imitation.2 In essence, trademarks are significant because they identify the origin of goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Trademarkguide a GUIDE to TRADEMARK REGISTRATION & PROTECTION in THAILAND TRADEMARKGUIDE a GUIDE to TRADEMARK REGISTRATION and PROTECTION in THAILAND
    TRADEMARKGuide A GUIDE TO TRADEMARK REGISTRATION & PROTECTION IN THAILAND TRADEMARKGUIDE A GUIDE TO TRADEMARK REGISTRATION AND PROTECTION IN THAILAND INTRODUCTION This publication is meant as a guide to the registration and protection of trademarks in Thailand. It is designed to help applicants obtain trademark protection in Thailand. DISCLAIMER This guide does not cover every issue and you should not regard this guide as an authoritative statement on the relevant procedure and trademark law. Requirements may also change from time to time and while we make every effort to ensure the information presented is accurate, you should check with us or with a legal practitioner experienced in Thai trademark law before relying on the information. We assume no obligation or liability for damage arising out of the use, or inability to use, the information provided. Every effort is made to keep this information up to date. However, errors and omissions may occur. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Franck Fougere is Managing Partner of Ananda Intellectual Property and has been practicing in Thailand since 2003. His practice area includes patent prosecution, anti-counterfeiting and litigation. He graduated from Institut d’Etudes Politiques (Strasbourg) in France and College of Europe (Bruges) in Belgium and trained with a major international law firm before moving to Thailand. In addition to servicing several high profile multinational corporations in Europe, China, and Southeast Asia, Franck is a frequent speaker of cutting-edge IP issues at professional symposiums and conferences. A recognized expert, Franck is a regular lecturer in patent law for the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and an advisor to the European Union (ECAP) and to the French Government on IP issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Property for Public Use: the Federal Trademark Dilution Act And
    Journal of Intellectual Property Law Volume 11 | Issue 1 Article 13 April 2016 Private Property for Public Use: The edeF ral Trademark Dilution Act and Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act as Violations of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause Brian C. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian C. Smith, Private Property for Public Use: The Federal Trademark Dilution Act and Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act as Violations of the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause, 11 J. Intell. Prop. L. 191 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol11/iss1/13 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Smith: Private Property for Public Use: The Federal Trademark Dilution A PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC USE: THE FEDERAL TRADEMARK DILUTION ACT AND ANTICYBERSQUATTING CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AS VIOLATIONS OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TAKINGS CLAUSE I. INTRODUCTION William Dupont has lived in Springfield, USA for all of his life. He has owned and operated his business, which makes high-quality construction boots, for over fifteen years. During this time, the popularity of his products has grown, and twice his store moved to a larger location, expanding to receive phone orders for his shoes. About a year and a half ago, William Dupont decided to expand his business beyond the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Bart Holterman the Fish Lands
    Bart Holterman The Fish Lands Bart Holterman The Fish Lands German trade with Iceland, Shetland and the Faroe Islands in the late 15th and 16th Century ISBN 978-3-11-065165-2 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-065557-5 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-065182-9 DOI https://10.1515/9783110655575 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020936382 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2020 Bart Holterman, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Cover Image: Olaus Magnus’ Carta Marina (1539), Section A, Iceland Typesetting: Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Preface The current work was defended as a PhD thesis at the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Hamburg in 2019. The supervisors were Jürgen Sarnowsky (University of Hamburg) as primary and Carsten Jahnke (University of Copenhagen) as secondary. The work you are reading now is a slightly revised version of this thesis, with minor points added or corrected, and an updated bibliography. However, the publication of this book marks only the end of a process that was set in course long before I started to work on the subject. At an interdisciplin- ary conference about the medieval North Atlantic trade in Avaldsnes, Norway, in 2013, the idea came up that it would be good if someone would compile an exten- sive overview of the German trade with the North Atlantic, based on historical written sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Trademark Services
    What is Trademark? Trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one enterprise from those of other enterprises TRADEMARK Sign: Name, Word, Sound, Logo, Symbol, Design, Phrase Criteria: Distinctive Non-Descriptive Selecting a Mark Duration: Unlimited subject to renewal Avoiding likelihood of confusion Rights: Prevent unauthorized use of the mark and counterfeiting The likelihood of confusion exists when the marks of the parties are similar (looks Trademark Symbol - TM, SM, R alike, sounds alike, similar meaning or creates similar overall commercial Ÿ Use of the "TM" symbol - for trademark impression) or the parties have related Ÿ Use of the "SM" symbol - for service mark goods and services in such as way that the Ÿ Use of the " R " symbol - for registered trademark consumers are likely to believe that it comes from the same source. Who can use a Trademark? Create a strong mark A strong mark fulfills two main objects The right to use a mark can be exercised either by a registered stops third party use and is easier to proprietor or a registered user or anybody else who has been duly authorized by a registered proprietor or a registered user. protect Strong Mark Who can make an application? Fanciful and arbitrary marks – they are inherently distinctive as they are created Ÿ Any person who claims to be the proprietor of a trademark used or or inventive that does not have any proposed to be used by him can apply for the registration of the dictionary or other known meaning and mark for goods as well services.
    [Show full text]